Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutComments PWT 4/24/2009 L1MBIRD Andrew From: Sent: To: Subject: DRISCOLL Jon Friday, April 24, 2009 5:34 PM L1MBIRD Andrew mtgate cluster Andy, Could you take a quick look at this for clarity? I wanted to give you a chance to comment before I sent the revised Comment Sheet. I guess we could review it again at the meeting, too. Findinl!: As noted in SDC 4.2-105(E)(I), Dead-endslreels shall terminale in cul-de-sac bulb, "hammerhead" or olher design lhat provides an adequate vehicular lurn-around area as may be approved by lhe Public Works Director and the Fire Marshal. Finding: The tentative subdivision application (SUB2007-00041) that was submitted prior to this site plan application (DRC2008-00040) illustrated a turnaround on the local street which abuts the eastern side of Lots 29-36. Said turnaround was located between Lot 35 and Lot 36 and was 24 foot wide, 70 feet deep with 30 radii. Finding: On the street which abuts the castem side of Lots 29-36, this sile plan application (DRC2008-00040) shows no cul-de-sac bulb, "hammerhead," nor any other turnaround design. As SDC 4.2-1 05(E) (I) requires this, the Springfield Public Works Transportation Staff finds that the proposal does not meet the standard as set forth in the Springfield Development Code. Findinl!: The Fire Life and Safety Department has reviewed the proposed site plan (DRC 2008-00040) for confonnance with fire code regulations. Based upon access to lot frontage as shown in the proposed site plan (with lots 29-36 having adequate fire access to the existing Mountaingate Drive and lots 37-45 having fire access to the street to the east of them) said Department detennined that the proposed local street'which abuts the eastern side of Lots 29-36 did not require a turnaround capable of accommodating fire apparatus. Findinl!: Vehicles that are than passenger cars larger will be utilizing the proposed local street which abuts the eastern side of Lots 29-36. Springfield Public Works Transportation slaff expects that the predominant traffic needs would he met by a turnaround that would accommodate a 30 foot SU (Single Unit) vehicle (e.g. garbage truck). Findinl!: The Springfield Public Works Transportation Staff has detemiined that the original dimensions on the tentative subdivision application (SUB2007-00041) and may be changed to 25 foot wide, 65 feet deep with 20 radii and still accommodate the minimum standard for a Single Unit vehicle. Recommended Condition: Prior to the acceptance of the Final Site Plan, the applicant shall modify the site plan to include a turnaround which will accommodate a 30 foot Single Unit vehicle. , Sincerely, fin- Jon Driscoll EfT, PLS, WRE Transportation Engineer in Training City of Springfield, Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97478 Date f(eceived: 'I/-z ~/)<J-cf Planner: AL 1