Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutComments PWS 5/7/2009 L1MBIRD Andrew From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: MOORHEAD Chris Thursday, May 07, 2009 5:06 PM , 'ANTHONYJ FAVREAU'; Chad Bettesworth; Mark Vukanovich; 'survey@dishmail.net' L1MBIRD Andrew; ERNST Dennis; HUNTER Peggy K RE: The Cottage Collection at the Heights (formerly North Cluster) - subdivision review FINAL Tony, The plat looks good, and is complete to our satisfaction. Thanks for the understanding of and the attention to the comments we've made. Please do send a copy of the revised CCR's when you have them, or any questions you have regarding the last couple Supplemental CCR's comments, from review #2 attached below. Otherwise we are ready to accept the mylars of the plat and the rest of the Plat Submittal packet. Thanks, Chris Chris Moorhead, PLS Swveyor, City of Springfield Public Works 225 Fifth StreeC Springfield, Oregon 97477 Tel. 541-736-1011 Fax 541-726-3781 cmoorheadrfiJci.sorinofield. or. us From: ANTHONY J FAVREAU [mailto:favreaugroup@msn.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 5:25 PM To: MOORHEAD Chris Cc: Chad Bettesworth; Mark Vukanovich Subject: Re: The Cottage Collection at the Heights (formerly North Cluster) -- subdivision review #2 Chris, Attached is the revised plat addressing the comments. Mark will be getting you the revised CC&Rs. I would like to submit mylars on Monday. Please let me know if you have any other comments. Thanks, Tony ---- Original Message -~-- From: MOORHEAD Chris To: 'Mark Vukanovich' ; favreauorouo(Q)msn ,com; surveviPIdishmail.net Cc: L1MBIRD Andrew; ERNST Dennis; HUNTER Peoov K ; 'Chad Bettesworth' Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 20094:19 PM Subject: The Cottage Collection at the Heights (formerly North Cluster) -- subdivision review #2 Here are the City Surveyor's office comments for the 2nd review of the above referenced plat: SHEET 1: · On the fence along the north property line, it looks like it is on the property line for the entire length. To clarify, can you please add a note and leader pointing to the fence stating "FENCE IS'ON THE PROPERTY LINE" 1 Date Received: S/rJ O.>o'l / / I Planner: AL . On the east end of the north access road, the south line of the road extends to theexterio,r property line. Can yo'u please cut it off before that exterior line, maybe by just trimming it at an extension of the conservation easement west line? Just as long as easement doesn't extend to the exterior boundary. . In discussion with the County Surveyor's office and further discussion with departments within the City, there has been some concern'that all of the streets in the plat are covered by a "Public Access Easement", rather than ,just the main entrance road to the future trailhead (Tract A), which is the' only one required to be public access per the planning conditions of approval. It would help to make things c1~arer if you could make another easement type, "VARIABLE WIDTH PUBLIC UTILITY AND PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENT DEDICATED HEREON". Then have the streets both North and South of the main entrance road be the new PRIVATE easement type. Please also include the intersection curves in the Public section, for some turnaround space. SHEET 2: . On the CCR note, being that for this plat it is a Supplemental CCR, can you please make reference to the original CCR recording information (the already recorded Mtngate West CCR) and also the Supplemental CCR with recording information blanks to be filled in. ' OTHER ITEMS: . There are some requested edits to the Supplemental CCR's that Andy (planning) made, and a copy of the CCR's with those requested edits is attached. . Also, Dennis (City Surveyor) requested that in the Supplemental CCR's, STREETS section, note is made of who is responsible for private utilities located therein, if any. Here's Dennis' quote: The street section mention the home owners association will be charged with the ongoing maintenance. There are a lot of private utilities that were not mentioned that will have thaI same obligation. Somewhere it needs to be clear that the homeowner will have to maintain all private infrastructure. It should be clear where the line between the public and private systems is. (Such as all utilities in private easement and private roadways are owned by the homeowners association) I think a note that "Within the Public Utility Easements and Access Easements, all utilities past the electric vaults serving an individual residence, all water service past the water meter serving an individual residence, all television service past the main junction box serving an individual residence, and any other utility service serving an individual residence past it's main junction box are private services maintained by the residence or lot they serve" Does that sound reasonable?? Attached below are the County's comments. I will let you know later today if I have any comments on the new easement layout. Thanks, Chris Chris Moorhead, PLS Surveyor, City of Springfield Public Works 22S Filth Stree~ Springfield, Oregon 97477 Tel. 541-736-1011 Fax 541-726-3781 cmoorhead!fiJci.sorinofield. or. us 2 Date Received' Planner: AL s/f; /Jvcr , I . , From: HUNTER Peggy K [mailto:Peggy.HUNTER@CO.Lane.OR.US] Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 3:06 PM To: MOORHEAD Chris; ERNST Dennis; GIVENS Everett L Subject: FW: Cottage Collection at the Heights--SUB 2007-00041 -- Comments LANE COUNTY SURVEYOR'S OFFICE COMMENTS ,Dear Dennis & Chris, With regard to this Subdivision please have Mr.-Swanson address the following: 1. There is a segment of the exterior boundary missing in the Certificate which should follow "547.98" at the end of line 8. 2. Please change "Landscape" in the last sentence of the Declaration to "Conservation" to match Easement Note 3. 3. If,the Notary is not using their sta'mp please include a line for both the signature and printed name of the Notary. 4. In Easement Note # 4 insert the word "Private" before "access easement". If the street leading to Tract "A" is to be used by the public to access the trails perhaps a note could be added to thateffect S. Will these Streets be named? If so, the names should be submitted to the road naming committee for approval. Approved names need to be shown on plat 6. Please enlarge the font size of the exterior boundary dimensions to help differentiate between lot dimensions. 7. In the Lots that contain curves it would be helpful to give dimensions of the line segments from the ends of the curves to the property lines. These dimensions could be added to the Line Table since there isn't much room on the map. 8. Please include recoding information of the existing CC&R's on the plat. 9. An updated Title Report will be required prior to final approval. 1O.Taxes for 2008-2009 in the amount of $10,853.59 are due prior to final approval (Amount good until 5/15/09). l1.Fees Due: ( payable to "Lane County", two checks please) Recording Fees: Processing & Filing: ,$576 + Docs? $700 3 Date ~eceived: sla /:-w-o. Planner: AL ! .