HomeMy WebLinkAboutComments PWE 1/23/2008
..
:.,.
Memorandum
City of Springfield
Date:
To:
Subject:
January 23,2008
Andy Limbird, Urban Planner
Eric Walter, Civil Engineer
DRC2007-00081, LTD / GatewaySite Plan
From:
I have reviewed the materials provided with the subject application, The ~~commended
fmdings and conditions outlined below are provided for your use in prepaJjng the
hind-use decision.
SANITARY SEWER
Finding: Scope of work does not include modifications to the existing Sanltary sewer(s);
. l-
therefore, no conditions will be necessary regarding sanitary sewer. .~
,
STORMW ATER MANAGEMENT
Finding: Section 4.3-11 O.B of the SDC requires that the Approval Authotitr shall grant
development approval only where adequate public and/or private storm water
management systems provisions have been made as determined by the Public Works
Director, consistent with the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual
(EDSPM), t
Finding: Section 4.3-110,D of the SDC requires that run-off from a deve1dpment shall be
directed to an approved stormwater management system with sufficient c~iJacity to
accept the discharge,
Finding: Section 4.3-11 O,j; of the SDC requires new developments to emp,loy drainage
management practices, which minimize the amount and rate of surface water run-off into
receiving streams, and which promote water quality. ."
Finding: On th~ private property area, the changes to the ~xisting impervi6us surfaces
and resulting site drainage is insignificant and therefore existing drainage system can be
,~
maintained with no need for upgrades. The covered walkway area will dra,in to weep
holes into curb and to pavement area that ultimately drainS to existing are~: drains in the
existing parking lot. Since walk way roof area is narrow, and where changes to the .
existing impervious areas are insignificant, the proposed modifications wi1,1 be acceptable
and no further conditions will be necessary. There is a new 6" storm line proposed and
minor modifications including a new catch basin at the bus shelter at street. frontage,
Please refer to the conditions under the "Public Streets, Sidewalks, and Improvement
Agreements" section for Public Improvement Permit requirements for all work being
proposed in the public right-of-way. . .
. .. R ,i 'ed
Date. eC8IV :
Planner;; .
I':Z3-Df
A
:'
.,
"
it,
!
.
,
"
PUBLIC STREETS. SIDEWALKS & IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS
Finding: The applicant has proposed construction of sidewalks and modifications to the
curb and gutter along the Gateway Street frontage to accommodate the bus traffic and
includes minor modifications to the existing storm system. Tbe proposed 'modifications
. .
appear to comply with City codes and standards.
Condition: Prior to commencing work in the public right-of-way, the applicant shall
,
obtain, through Public Works Department, a Public Improvement Permit. .: Please refer to
Chapter 12 Of the City of Springfield Engineering Design Standards and Rrocedures
Manual for the detailed requirements for this permit. This manual can be ';viewed on the
City of Springfield website through the following link: . .
htto:/ /www.ci.sorini!field.or.us/oubworks/desilm/1inktable.odf
. UTILITIES. EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY
Finding: Section 4.3" 140,A of the SDC requires applicants proposing developments
make arrangements with the City and each utility provider for the dedication of utility
easements necessary to fully service the development or land beyond the development
area, The minimum width for public utility easements adjacent to street rights of ways
shall be 7 feet.rTbe minimum width for all other public utility easements shall be 7 feet.
The Public Works Director may require a larger easement to allow for addquate
maintenance.
Finding: The plans indicate private uses including bus shelters encroaching into the.
public right-of-way, . 'i
Condition: Prior to approval of the Final Site Plan, the applicant shall obt)tin approval
and execute aRight -Of-Way Use Agreement with the City of Springfield for all proposed
private uses that include LTD structure encroachments into public righhof-way.
OTHER. ..
NOTE: The intent of this "list is to give a developer insight about requirements related to.
public improvements before they develop their property,
FEES AND PERMITS
SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT CHARGE: . "
Pay applicable Systems Development Charges when building permits are issued for
developments within the City limits or within the Springfield Urban Gro~ Boundary,
(The cost relates to the amount of ipcrease in impervious surface' area, transportation trip
rates, and plumbing fixture units, Some exceptions apply to Springfield Urban Growth
areas.) [Springfield Code Chapter II, Article il]
Systems D~ve10pment Charges (SDC's) will apply to the construction ofguildings and
site improvements within the subject site" The Charges will be based upon the rates in
effect at the time of permit submittal for buildings or site improvements on each portion
or phase of the development. '
,
"', .
Date R~ceived:
Planner\
\ - 23-of
AI--:
-'.' ..
. .
SANITARY SEWER IN-LIEU-OF -ASSESSMENT CHARGE:
Pay a Sanitary Sewer In-Lieu-of-Assessment charge in addition to the regular connection
fees if the property or portions .of the property being developed have not previously been.
assessed or otherwise participated in the cost"of a public sanitary sewer. Contact the
Engineering Division to determine if In-Lieu-of-Assessment charge is applicable, [Ord .
5584]
PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE FEES:
It is the responsibility of the private developer to fund the public infrastructure, .
OTHER CITY PERMITS: .
)
Encroachment Permit or Sewer Hookup Permit (working within right-of-way or public
easements) example: new tap to the public storm or sanitary sewer, or adjusting a
manhole. [The current rate is $135 for processing plus applicable fees and deposits]
Land & Drainage Alteration Permits (LDAP), [Contact the Springfield Public Works
Department @ 726-5849 for appropriate applications/requirements]
ADDITIONAL PERMITS/APPROVALS MAYBE NECESSARY:
o Metropolitan Wastewater Management C'ommission (Pump station, sanitary
sewers 24 inches or larger).
. Lane County Facilities Permit (If the project is within Lane County jurisdiction)
. Railroad (If the project crosses a railroad) ,
. Oregon Department of Transportation (If the project is within ODOT juris~iCtion).
. Division of State Lands (Storm water discharge, wetlands)
. . Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (Erosion control (5 acres or
greater), pump. station, storm water discharge, wetlands) .
. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Storm water discharge, wetlands)
. Date Received:.
.. Planner:
\ - 2-3 -0 S'
AL- .
" ~;'
.,