Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutComments PWE 11/27/2007 P~ge 1 of 1 L1MBIRD Andrew From: GOODWIN Len Sent: Tuesday, November 27,20074:16 PM To: L1MBIRD Andrew Cc: WALTER Eric; KRUEGER Kristi Subject: RE: L TD Agreement for Gateway Mall Station I agree. The City should be a party to any agreement which conteomplates work being performed in the right of way. Len From: UMBIRD Andrew Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 3:36 PM To: GOODWIN Len Cc: WALTER Eric Subject: L TO Agreement for Gateway Mall Station Len: I am reviewing the pre-submittal package for a site plan modification that proposes to relocate the Gateway Mall L TD station to the edge of Gateway Street north of the Umpqua Bank. A portion of the station is proposed within public right-of-way that is to be dedicated from the mall property. The applicant states they will have an agreement with the mall owner for maintenance and operation of the transit station. The applicant's project narrative states the details of the agreement have not been worked out, but are not relevant to the site plan review and therefore should be of no concern to the City. I would question this position and ,suggest the agreement might very well be a tripartite agreement between the mall, L TD and the City, recognizing the facility is proposed to straddle private property and public right-of-way. What are your thoughts on this issue so we can provide direction to the applicant? Thanks Andy ) 11/27/2007 . Date Received: /~J~7 Planner: AL . , I