HomeMy WebLinkAboutNotice PLANNER 6/19/2008
'f
.'
~
RECEIVED
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE,
JUN 1 92008
By: ~I}~
/rrfI3p~
STATE OF OREGON)
)ss.
County of Lane )
I, Karen LaFleur~ being first duly sworn, do hereby depose and say as follows:,
1. I state that I am a Program Technician for the Planning Division of the
Development Services Department, City of Springfield, Oregon.
2. I state that in my capacity as, Program Technician, I prepared and caused to be.
mailed copies of DR('?l)')5(-{)(]{)~"i N~.li tI} i'lt-fiJ1bJ -dItL./ fJ.dI~- r!.r:ti dJ. +t',L,
(See attachment "A") on ~ Ilg , 2008 addressed to (see ~
Attachment B"), by causing said letters to be placed in a U.S. mail box with
postage fully prepaid thereon.
'dIaJ)ML *tL~
~J~ LaFLEUR I ,
STATE OF OREGON, County of Lane
~ 11111) I q . 2008. Personally appeared the above named Karen LaFleur,
(prQgram Technician, who acknowledged the foregoing instrument to be their voluntary
act. Before me:
.
OFFICIAL SEAL
DEYETTE KELLY
NOTARYPUBUC-OREGON
COMMISSION NO, 420351
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES AUG. 15, 2011
J::r(flif-J1/
My Commission EX~ires: g /;5/11
I
\
.
.
Notice of Decision -Site Plan Review & Tree Felling
Project Name: Thurston'FIre Station 16 I
Project Proposal: Demolish.existing fire station and constrp.ct a new one on the same site
Case Number: DRC2008-00036 (Site Plan Review); DRC2008-00035 (Tree Felling)'
Project Location: 68th and Main St
Property size: 1 acre
Base Zone: LDR (Low Density Residential)
Overlay District(s): none
Metro Plan Designation: LDR (Low Density Residential)
Refinement PlanjDesignation: n/ a
Pre-Submittal Meeting Date: May 20, 2008
Application Submitted Date: May 28, 2008
Decision Issued Date: June 18, 2008
Appeal Deadline Date: July 3, 2008
I'CITY'OF.SPRINGFIELD,DEVELbPMENT~'REVIEW;:tEAM ;J~;iR',;.wi~;":!,Uldfiiilli:~'1'\'(Z.lg;.iijS;illfiRfJif~):lk",ii~;i~;]
l'_,"\:" ~'., .:."i'i'; "J -.1#.. .~.-.:,:~.. '\':"~""',;,'~:-~"..",':~;.-- ""t.. ',_;'t!' ,-,.~_'_"',~' '-y-"",::;"-';\"''';;'ii<., ".:-''''<-,,:.I-;;:'''''-'/-;7f ,',Wi ~"""r"._:"'B"...,}~__::,__<_$;;; "':i'\""i"":j'~'''lJ?t'',r__:_:_,,:+:,,1dtK .L,('j)%i,9;!:.~:~JC~::_,.<..-"J(':_/:':\'i':'.,Jji.M:.t~,:%'\,g-""'.i'i\;;,' ';;:-l0.',~'!A/,tr-.;
I POSmON REVIEW OF NAME PHONE
I Project Manager Planning Steve Hopkins 726-3649
I Transportation Planning Engineer Transportation Gary McKenney I 726-4585
T,Jtilities, Sanitary &
Storm Sewer
Public Works Civil Engineer
Eric Walter ,
736-1034
I Deputy Fire Marshall
I CommUnity Services Manager
I
I Fire and life Safety
I Building
I Gilbert Gordon
I Dave Puent
I 726-2293
I 726-3668
- ~ - -
IWAP-Pi:lf<;;ANT;S'I5EVEIlOPMENTiREVIEW;tEA.M~~,,!;~l!tI#S""'~~~I11!'!"l!,~ii!cl''''l0~"'E!\~;L"llili
~~;ool-~a'(~~ig""~!;-)w~i','\';-wl.;r~l*~'W!.~~,tcV$,2c~~'t!,",l~~~:~~$,I~'-;f,iiiiW".ii~jf,,~~.J>!1Z!t"~Jm';f,~';;k~*';;1,:%~~
Owner/Applicant:
Department of Fire and Life Safety
City of Springfield
225 Fifth St
Springfield OR 97477
,Representative: .
Carol StIDeman
Asst. Proj. Mgr., City of Sprip.gfield
225 Fifth St, Springfield OR 97477
726-4658
Thurston Fire Station 16
Case No. DRCl008.o0036
Site:
N
fA.
Summary of proposal: Demolish the existing fire station and construct a new station on the
. same site.
Decision: Tentative Approval with conditions, as of the date of this letter. The standards of.
the Springfield Development Code (SDC) applicable to each criterion of approval are listed
herein and are satisfied by the submitted plans and notes unless specifically noted with findings
and conditions necessary for compliance. The Final Site Plan must conform to the submitted
plans as conditioned herein. This is a limited land use decision made according to city code and
state statutes. Unless appealed, the decision is final. Please read this document 'carefully.
"
Other Uses Authorized by the Decision: None. Future development will be in accordance with
the provisions of the SDC, filed easements and agreements, and all applicable local, state and
federal regulations.
Review Process: These applications are reviewed under Type Ii pr6cedures listed in SDC 5.1-
130, the Site Plan Review Criteria in SDC 5.17-100 and the Tree Felling Criteria in SDC 5.19-100.
Procedural Findings:
. Applications for. Limited Land Use Decisions require the notification of property
owners/ occupants within 300 feet of the subject property. allowing for a 14 day
comment period on the applications (SDC Sections 5.1-130 and 5.2-115). The applicant
Thu",!on Fire Station /6
Case No. DRQOOB.{)0036
2
and parties submitting written comments during the notice period have appeal rights
and are mailed a copy'of this decision f<!r consideration.
. Notice was sent to .adjacent property owners/ occupants within 300 feet of the subject
site on May 28, 2008.
. On June 10, 2008, the City's Development Review Committee reviewed the proposed
plans. City staff's review comments have been reduced to findings and conditions only
as necessary for compliance with the Tentative Site Plan Criteria of Approval contained
in SDC 5.17-125. This decision was issued on the 21st day of the 120 days mandated by
the state.
. In accordance with SDC 5.17-135, the Final Site Plan shall comply with the requirements
of the SDC and the conditions imposed by the Director in this decision. The Final Plan
otherwise shall be in substantial conformity with the tentative plan reviewed. Portions
of the proposal approved as submitted during tentative review cannot be substantively
changed during Final Plan approval.
Comments Received:
Charles Hobbs, Jr., 6870 Main St, Spririgfield OR 97478, received on June 9, 2008. "The people at
this residence will agree with anything regarding a new replacement of Springfield fire station
#16." .
SDC 5.17-125
Site Plan Review Criteria of Approval,
The Director shall approve or approve with conditions: a Type IT Site Plan Review application
upon determining that approval criteria A. through E.! below have been satisfied. If conditions .
cannot be attached to satisfy the approval criteria, the Director shall deny the application.
A. The zoning is consistent with the Metro Plan diagram, and/or the applicable
Refinement Plan diagram, Plan District map, and Conceptual Development Plan.
,
. Finding: The site is zoned LDR (Low Density Residential). This area is designated Low
Density Residential by the Metro Plan. There is no applicable refinement plan.
Finding: In accordance with SDC 4.7-160, High Impact facilities are allowed in the LDR .
zone with a Type ill Discretionary Use review, unless the facility is designated on the
Metro Plan's Public Facilities and Services Plan. Fire and Police Services are not listed in
that Plan. However, Fire Station 16 is shown on the Department of Fire and Life Safety
"Standards of Cover and Deployment Study". Based on a memo dated May 30, 2007, Jim
Donovan, the Planning Supervisor, has determined this study meets the requirement for
designation on a public facilities plan. Therefore, the proposed facility does not require
Discretionary Use Review.
Conclusion: The proposal complies with SDC 5.17-125(A).
B. Capacity requirements of public and private facilities, including but not limited to,
water and electricity; sanitary sewer and stormwater management facilities; and streets
Thurston Fife Station /6
Case No. DRClOOB-00036
3
and traffic safety controls shall not be exceeded and the public improvements shall be
available to serve the site at the time of development, unless otherwise provided for by
this Code and other applicable regulations. The Public Works Director or a utility
provider shall determine capacity issues.
SANITARY SEWER .
Finding: Pursuant to Olapter 3.03.4.A of the City's Engineering Design Standards and
Procedures Mnnual and Section 4.4 of Portland's Stormwater Management Manual, solid
Waste storage areas shall be covered and hydraulically isolated from potential
stormwater runoff, and directed to the sanitary sewer system. The submitted plans
comply with this requirement.
Finding: There is an existing 8" sanitary sewer line crossing the property. The site
utility plan does not identify a sanitary sewer connection from the proposed building to
the existing sanitary sewer.
1. Condition of Aooroval: Prior to aooroval of the final site olan. show the sanitarY
- -
sewer connection from the existinl!' 8" lateral oioe to the buildinl!'.
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
Finding: To comply with Sections 4.3-110(D) & (E) of the Springfield Development
Code, stormwater runoff from the site will be directed into a series of swales and basins.
The north swale will be primarily used for reducing storm water runoff to the public
system and the south infiltration bio swale will be used primarily for storm water
quality.
Finding: As of June 17, 2008, the drainage plan has been changed from what was
submitted on May 28. A new drainiJ.ge study and corresponding revisions to the civil
drawings are required prior to approval of the final site plan.
2. Condition of Aooroval: Submit a revised drainal!'e studv and civil drawinl!'s that
accuratelv reflect the drainap'e olan. This ulan must be aoTjroved urior to
approval of the final site plan.
Finding: The existing public stormwater system located in Main Street serving this site
has limited capacity. Due to this capacity constraint, the site will be required to limit
post-developed runoff to existing peak flow rates:
Finding: Section 3.02 of the City's EDSPM states the Public Works Department will
accept, as interim design standards for stormwater quality, water quality facilities
designed pursuant to the policies and procedures of either the City of Portland (BES), or
the Oean Water Services (CWS). .
Finding: Section 3.03.3.B of the City's EDSPM states all public and private development
and redevelopment projects shall employ a system of one or more post-developed BMPs
that in combination are designed to achieve at least a 70 percent reduction in the total
suspended solids in the runoff generated by that development. Section 3.03.4.E of the
manual requires a minimum of 50 percent of the non-building rooftop impervious area
on a site shall be treated for stormwater quality improvement using vegetative methods.
Thu"ton Fire Station 16
Cose No. DRQOOB.{)0036
4
,
3. Condition of Aooroval: Submit an ooerations and maintenance olan for the
- -
swales. The olan should desilmate maintenance responsibility for operatinl! and
maintaininl! the svstem.
Finding: The vegehltion proposed for use in the swales will serve as the primary
pollutant removal mechanism for the stormwater runoff, and will remove suspended
,solids and pollutants through the processes of sedimentation and filtration. Satisfactory
pollutant removal will occur only when the vegetation has been fully established.
4. Condition of Apvroval: The private vel!etative water Qualitv infiltration swale
and basin shall be fullv vel!etated with all vegcetation species established orior to
approval of Final Occupancv. Alternativelv. if this condition cannot be met. the
applicant shall DTovide and maintain additional interim erosion control! water
Qualitv measures acceptable to the Public Works Department that will suffice
until such time as the swale vel!etation becomes fullv established.
UTILITIES. EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY
Finding: The applicant has proposed a 7 foot public utilitY easement along the frontage
of 68th Place and along the frontage of Main Street, which satisfies Section 4.3"140.A of
the SDC. . '
Finding: An 8" public sanitary line crosses the property. During the survey of the site, it
was discovered this line is not located within the existing easement.
5. Condition of Aooroval: Prior to anv occupancv, record the necessaiv easement
for the sanitarv sewer line.
OTHER'
Finding: The pavement cross section shown on sheet C6.2 includes a 12" layer called a
"granular working blanket". The geotechnical engineering report dated Feb 28, 2008,
contains specific requirements for the granular working blanket. In order to
communicate the requirements for that layer to the contractor, include a note on Sheet
C6.2 that references the requirements contained in that report.
Q. Condition of Ao;'rovaI: Revise sheet C6.2 to include a reference to the gceo-tech
report and the reQuirements of the Q:Tanular workinl! blanket.
Conclusion: As conditioned, the proposal complies with SDC 5.17-125(B).
c. . The proposed development shall comply with all applicable public and private design
and construction standards contained in this Code and other applicable regulations.
Finding: In accordance with SDC 6.1-100, the proposed fire station is considered a High
Impact Public Utility .F~ciIity.
"SDC 4.7-160 High Impact Public Facilities
A.' . The facility shall be designatea on the Metro Plan's Public Facilities and
Services Plan or be approved in accordance with a Type III review
'procedure (Discretionary Use).
Thurston Fire Stolion /6
Case No. DRClOOB-00036
5
B. 'The facility shall be screened as specified in Sectian 4.4-100.
C. In residential districts, a minimUm .of 25 percent of the loti parcel shall be
landscaped." .
Finding: The site plan complies with these criteria. The trash enclosure and parking areas
are screened from public view and at least 25% of the site is landscaped.
Finding: The,site will be enclosed with chain link fencing with slats, which will also
screen the dumpster from public view. ' ,
Finding: Pursuant to Chapter 3.03.4.A of the City's Engineering Design Standards and
Procedures Manual and Section 4.4 of Portland's StaTll1.water Management Manual, salid
waste storage areas shall be covered and hydraulically isolated from 'potential
stormwater runoff, and directed to the sanitary sewer system. The submitted plans do
not show a roof over the dumpster area.
,7. Canditian .of Aooraval: Provide'details of the roof over the dumpster area.
Finding: Although the site is not within the Drinking Water Protection Overlay, the Fire
Code requires a Hazardous Material Inventory Sheet for,t:h,e facility. Thi,s shall be
submitted ta Gilbert Gordon prior to any occupancy of the site.
8. Candition of Aooroval: Prior to anv occupancy. submit a Hazardous Materials
InventoTV Statement (HMlS).
Finding: The plans do not show the undergraund fir~ line ta the building fire sprinkler
system. This line must meet NFP A 24 requirements.
,
9. Condition .of Aooraval: ReviSe the final site plan to show the undercround
water line to the buildinl! fire sorinkler system.
Canclusian: The proposal complies with SDC 5.17-125(C).
D. Parking areas imd ingress-egress points have been, designed ta: facilitate vehicular
traffic, bicycle and pedestrian safety ta avaid cangestian; provide connectivity within
the develapment area and ta adjacent residential areas, transit stops; neighbarhaad
activity centers, and cammercial, industrial' and public areas; minimize driveways an
arterial and callector streets as specified in this Cade or ather applicable regulatiansand
comply with the ODOT access management standards far State highways.
Finding: The site includes parking for staff and a separate area far the public.
Finding: The site has frontage an Main Street, which is a state highway. Access to Main
Street is controlled by OOOT. According to the cominents from ODOT dated June 10,
2008, the applicant will need to shaw proof .of an existing Access permit for the driveway
an Main Stree,t .or 'apply for a new permit.
10. Canditian .of Aooraval: Applv ta ODOT for an access permit prior to the final site
plan. Submit the apProved permit prior to OCClloancv of the buildinl!.
Finding: In accordance with SDC 4.2-130, the landscaping shall notinterfere with the
clear vision areas at the intersections and the driveways. The pine tree at the northwest
comer of the site has significant foliage wrapping around the trunk which impedes the
clear vision area at the intersection of 68th and Main. '
Thurston fjre Station 16.
Case No. DRClOOB-00036 .
,6
11. Condition of Aooroval: Maintain the clear vision triamde at the intersection of
68th and Main Streets and at the comers of both drivewavs.
Finding: The comments from SUB indicate the proposed red oak trees along the Main St.
frontage are not acceptable under the power lines.
12. Condition of Aoproval: Revise the landscape plan to show aDlJrooriate trees
under the power lines alone: the Main Street frontae:e.
Finding: Theone-way sign at the public entrance as ~hown on C4.0 should face into the
parking lot, perpendiCular to the centerline of 68th Place.
13. Condition of Aooroval: Revise the final site plan to show the one-wav silm is
perpendicular to the centerline of 68th Place.
Finding: In accordance with SDC 4.6-100, this facility is required to provide three bicycle
. parking spaces, two short-term and one long-term. The short term spaces will be located
near the public entrance and the long term space will be inside the building.
Finding: The outside lighting plan shows 8 pole lights and 10 wall mounted lights. All
op.tdoor lights must be fully shielded. Because the site 'is surrounded by property zoned
LDR (Low Density Residential), the pole lights are limited to 12' high, in accordance with
SDC4.5-110.
14. Condition of Aboroval: Pole lie:hts shall.not exceed 12' hie:h and all outdoor lie:hts
shall contain full cut off,shields.
Conclusion: As conditioned, the proposal complies with SDC 5.17-125(D).
E. Physical features, including, but not limited to: steep slopes with unstable soil or
geologic conditions; areas with susceptibility of flooding; significant clusters of trees
and shrubs; watercourses shown on the WQLW Map and their associated riparian areas;
wetlands; rock outcroppings; open spaces; and areas of historic and/or archaeological
significance, as may be specified in Section 3.3-900 or ORS 97.740-760, 358.905-955 and
390.235-240, shall be protected as specified in this Code or in State or Federal law.
Finding: The Natural Resources Study, the National Wetlands Inventory, the Springfield
Wetland Inventory Map, and the list of Historic Landmark Sites were consulted. No
historic or cultural resources have been identified on this site.
Conclusion: The proposal complies with SDC 5.17-125(E).
SDC 5.19-125(A)-(H): Tree Felling Criteria of Approval
Finding: The 26 trees proposed for removal are either directly in the path of the proposed
construction or will suffer significant root damage during demolition of the existing
building that will make them hazardous trees. The site is generally level and no evidence
has been submitted that removal of the trees win cause any slope instability;
Finding: A landscape plan has been submitted with the site plan review. It proposes 19
new trees within the site. .
Finding: Vehicles will use 68th St and work will occur between 7 am and 5 pm
Thurston Fire Station 16
Cose No. DRQOOB-00036
7
15. Condition of Avvroval: The followID2' 2'eneral construction vractices aoolv
when tree felline: is initiated on site:
. Notification shall be vroVided to the City at least 5 davs orior to
commencement of the tree fellinl1: overation. Please contact Steve Hopkins
at 726-3649 or shookins@ci.sorinrneld.oi'.us.
. All fellin2: activities. includin2: in2:l'essand e2:l'ess for the tree fellinv
operations. shall include erosion control measures in conformance with the
City's En{>ineerin'? Desim Standords and Practices Manual.
. Anv soil and debris tracked into the street bv vehicles and eauipment leaving
the site shall be cleaned uo with shovels in a timelv manner and not washed
into the storm drain svstem.
Conclusion: As conditioned, the proposed tree felling complies with SDC 5.19-125.
DETERMINATION: Based on the evidence in the record. the Director determines the
prooosal comvlies with SDC 5.17-125IAl-lE) and'SDC 5.19-125IAl-1H1. subiect to the
Conditions of AoorovaI attached to this revort.
,
Thurston Fire Station 16
Case No. DRClOOB-00036
B
What Nee4s To Be Done?
SDC 5.17-135 states:'''Within 90 days of an affirmative decision by the Approval Authority, a
complete Final Site Plan shall be submitted to the Development Services Department. The
Final Site Plan submittal shall incorporate all approval conditions listed in the staff report. The
Final Site Plan shall become null and void if construction has not begun within two years of
the signing of the Development Agreement required in Section 5.17-140." '
A Final Site Plan application is charged upon submittal of the complete application and all
required documents and after all conditions of approval are met, including the construction of
public and private improvements and extension of utilities required through this decision. The
Final Site Plan shall con}ply with the requirements of the SDC and the conditions imposed by
the Director in this decision. The Final Site Plan otherwise shall be in substantial conformity
with the tentative plan reviewed. Portions of the proposal approved as submitted during
tentative review cannot be substantively changed during final site plan approval. Approved
Final Site Plans (including Landscape Plans) shall not be substantively changed during Building
,Permit Review without an approved Site Plan Modification.
The final. site plan set shall include an index page and the following sheets:
A-4 Elevations
C3 Utility Plan: revised sanitary I storm
plan
C4 Horizontal control and paving plan
C5 Grading plan
C6 Civil details
C6.2 Civil details: add note about
,geotech report
. C6.3 Civil details
.
E1.1EIectricaI site plan: revised to
note poles are limited to 12'. full cut
off shields reQuire4
PLl Planting plan: replace ~ed oaks
PL2 Planting plan
TPl Tree preservation plan
STl Site plan: simplifv. remove
balloons and existinlr conditions
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT: . In accordance with SDC 15.17-140, a. Development,
Agreement is required to ensure that the terms and conditions of site plan review are binding
upon the applicant and the City. This agreement will be prepared by.5taff upon. approval of the
Final Site Plan arid must be signed by the applicant (Springfield Fire and Life Safety), prior to
the issuance of a building permit.
SECURITY AND ASSURANCES. All required improvements shall be installed prior to the
issuance of a certificate of occupancy or final building inspection. Refer to SDC 5.17-150 for
details regarding bonding for required improvements.
Thurston Fire Station '6
Case No. DRC200B_00036
, 9
Summary of Conditions of Approval. Unless otherwise noted, all conditions must be met
, prior toapproval of the final site plan.
1. Show the sanitary sewer connection from the existing 8" lateral pipe to the building.
2. Submit a revised drainage study and civil drawings that accurately reflect the drainage
plan. This plan must be approved prior to app~oval of the final site plan.
3. Submit an operations and maintenance plan for the swales. The plan should designate
maintenance responsibility for operating and maintaining the system.
4. The private vegetative water quality infiltration swale and basin shall be fully vegetated
with all vegetation species established prior to approval of Final Occupancy.
Alternatively, if this condition cannot be met, the applicant shall provide and maintain
additional interim erosion control/water quality. measures acceptable to the Public
Works Department that will suffice until such ,time' as the swale vegetation becomes
fully established.
. ,
5. Prior to any occupancy, record the necessary easement for the sanitary sewer line.
6. Revise she~t C6.2 to include a reference to the geo-tech report and the requirements of
the granular working blanket.
7. Provide details of the roof over the dumpster area.
8. Prior to any occupancy, submit a Hazardous Materials Inventory Statement (HMIS).
9.' Sho~ the underground water line to the building fire sprinkler system.
10. Apply to ODOT for an access permit prior to the final site plan. Submit the approved
permit prior to occupancy of the building.
11. Maintain the clear vision triangle at the intersection of 68th and Main Streets an4 at the
corners of both driveways. .
12. Revise the landscape plan to show appropriate trees under the power lines along the
Main Street frontage.
13. Revise the final site plan to show the one-way sign is perpendicu1artothe centerline of
68th Place.
14. Pole lights shall notexceed 12' high and all outdoor lights shall contain full cut off shields.
15. The following general construction practices-apply when tree felling is initiated on site:
. Notification shall be provided to the'City at least 5 days prior to
commencement of the tree felling operation. Please contact Steve Hopkins
at 726-3649 m shopkins@ci.springfield.or.us.
. AIl felling activities, including ingress and egress for the tree felling
operations, shall include erosion control measures in conformance with the
,City's Engineering Design Standards and Practices Manual.
. Any soil and debris tracked mto the street by vehicles and equipment leaving
the site shall be. cleaned up with shovels in a timely manner and not washed
into the storm drain system.
Thurston Fire Station 16
Case Na. DRC200B.{)0036
10
Additional Information: The application, all documents, and evidence relied'upon by the
applicant, and the applicabie criteria of approval are available for free inspection' and copies are
. available for a fee at the Development Services Deparbnent, 225 Fifth Street, Springfield,
. Oregon.
Appeal: This Type II Tentative Site Plan Review and Tree Felling decision may be appealed to
.the Planning Commission. The appeal may be filed with the Development Services Department
by an affected party. The appeal must be in accordance with SDC, Section 5.3-100, Appeals.
An Appeals application must be submitted to the City with a fee of $250.00. The fee will be
returned to the appellarit if the Planning Commission approves the appeal application.
In accordance with SDC 5.3-1l5(B) which provides for a 15-day appeal period and Oregon
Rilles of Civil Procedures, Rille 10(c) for service of notice by mail, the appeal period for this
decision expires at 5:00 p.m. on Jilly 3, 2008.
Questions: Please call Steve Hopkins in the Planning Division of the Development Services .
Deparbnent at(541) 726-3649 if you have any questions regarding this process.
Prepared by:
5>1;; ;f/L
Steve Hopkins, AICP
Planner II
Development Services - Urban Planning Division
Thurston Rre Station 16
Case No. DRGOOB-00036
II
. If....' J.... '"'1:J:f h' [t1 ~ 1 ~.' JIll' J:f::{ Cf.' J i'
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
PLANNIN'G'DEPARTMENT
225 FIFTH STREET
SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
225 FIFTH STREET
SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477
r~,v,vIIVU ..,&;.,-.....n".'...'.,
225 FIFTH STREET
SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477
Ik~
Department of Fire and Life Safety
City of Springfield '
Carol Stineman
Charles Hobbs, Jr.
6870 Main Street
Springfield, OR ' 97478
~~',!6