HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication APPLICANT 6/25/2009
:City of Springfield
Development Services Department
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR,97477
Development Issues Meeting
-('
Date Receh.,Jd:
JUN 2 5 2009
. original submi~tal'
(DIM)
132 East Broadway, Suite 200, Eugene, Oregon 97401
li;;.-_'^'-~_~"~~'J1:"'-, ~ '~;:m-"""~~~~g::':'::1'~____._'. ,&-1
I Property Owner: Same as Applicant information above
Icompany:
te~dre~~:,,,.,, %""''''':'''P",~,~".,,.,
Prospec~ive
Applicant Name:
Icompany:
. [Address:
I"~~<:'W'W"- .~_1_~:-'Y&.,,>:_,.
I Prospective
Applicant's Rep.:
[company:
IAddress:
, ....
Nick Boyles
Phone: 954.0217
OBO ENTERPRISES, LLC
Fax: .
1390 Grosbeak Court, Redmond, Ore.gon 97756
"'~.~_;~~-".,'S:"~~'~;;'j:;r"''M,",-i#_-__~ !f.'t~":_>:,__<t';l'__~~~~'~-_~""->N :<: _-'~;';~'_< , .
Kristen Taylor cr;I- .J"~Il-i LA\l! "vS6- '?;eTWl?-l6tJ I Phone: 687-1010 ex 15
.7/1.17 - glIb %~
TBG Architects & Planners/Inc I Fax: 687-0625
: '_~;: '>t':4,_,I!R
I
I
I
i.;.1
I
I
I
''''''i'.::'}__W\
-'1" - ~--,,".~~;~""g:\S1~'#_&
iIli!ll 1
Phone:
Fax:
,,,,~''i-':;'''~~m'i!iliiM&'ii'i!lJtili~t<Mi!IIW!~jr.ki1;~.~ .,;-~ ~>J>. ~"'~;:.
'J~__j5 ,',,,:'IIIV-'_"'l!l:,"~o,m::;.1
ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17-02-33-32
I TAX. LOT NO(S): 6300& 6200
Property Address: 5175 & 5195 Main Street
I (Tax Lot 6300) 29,185 & (Tax Lot 6200) 37,026
Size of Property: T.nIJ'1 pli,? _ Acres 0 Square Feet ~
L!'._!~_; ;''''-~'''''~~~c~,~~~~~~,~_~;:~~,,:r::-.. ~~;,o;,~;;,,;...brt.i,,~<t?l .;.-..;..oI'~:;"~,Yn:;-:-::i'\' ~ ~',~_dMr~-~r"""'f':':~_'_-Y I
Description of
Proposal:
I Existing Use:
# of Existing
Lots/Parcels:
>' -".''''\~'0m''~f!V!LAW''3: ~'W,
Prospective
Applicant:
If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description ,to this application.
Community Commercial retail/restaurant multi-tenant building development and a Mixed-Use Commecial
development .
One'single famil" rental home on Tax Lot 6300
2
~-"""~";W'"
Avg. Lot/Parcel Size: See above
"... ,N'':W"_~,'Y::_~:)<'''''~'''~"L [nIT ~'~,*p,,~\ #'
. sf .1 Density: N/A du/acre
~~ .~ ',' $'tt~rs"',""'~~"fu,,",:~'~~,~'_~~ ;,&_
~ .<It
Date: r 2-t;/ ZoO''''{
Signature ~idmt's Representative)
Kristen Taylor
Print
Required Project Informafion (City Intake. Staff: complete' thisi'section)
).,0Y1 ~9 -CJ:5D/0 Date: 6/2j5!~7 Reviewed by:
ITechnical Fee: $0 I Postage Fee: $0
I PROJECT NUMBER:
Case No.:
.~
oJ
Application Fee: $ 5 ~\ DO
TOTAL FEES: $
5 dJ 0,9
Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian
1 of 3
\
)'
"
Development Issues Meeting Process
The purpose of a Development' i~~u'es Meeting is to give an applicant the opportunity to discuss
his/herdevelopment proposal with the development review staff of the City. The discussion can
be general or specific, de'pending'on"thedetails provided with the application. A Development
Issues Meeting provides information to an applicant related to the current development
conditions and standards of the City. .The Development Issues Meeting is not a .land use decision
and does not confer any development rights, establish any conditions, or bind the applicant or
the City to any course of action. The meeting conveys the status of known development '.
opportunities and constraints, The status may change over time as development conditions or
standards change.
1. Applicant Submits a Development Issues Meeting Application
. The application must conform to the Development Issues Meeting Submittal
Requirements Checklist on page 3 of this application packet.
. Development issues meetings are conducted every Thursday.
. We strive to conduct the development issues meetings within three to four weeks of
receiving the application.
. The applicant's proposal is circulated to the relevant staff in preparation for the
meeting.
2. Applicant and the City Conduct the Development Issues Meeting
. The applicant and any design team should attend the development issues meeting.
. The meeting is scheduled for one hour.
. Staff attending the meeting will be prepared to discuss the issues raised in the
submittal by the applicant. Other issues raised during the meeting may also be
discussed.
. The meeting is informal and the City will issue no staff report.
.' ,
Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian
2.of 3
....._....'1
-
Development Issues Meeting Submittal Requirements Checklist
cgJ Application Fee - refer to.the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee
calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development Services
Department, The applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the
time of complete application submittal.
~ Development Issues Meeting.Application Form
~ Five (5) Questions - list specific questions the applicant would like staff to answer
during the meeting. So that each question may be fully evaluated, the list is limited to five
questions,
~ Ten (10) Copies of the Proposed Plan - suggested information valuable for staff to
review the proposal is listed below. It is not necessary to include all of these items on
the site or plot plan. However, applicants are encouraged to address as many as possible
given that the level of information that will be derived from the meeting is commensurate
with the level of detail provided in the application.
Applicants are also encouraged to include additional information on the plan as listed in
the Springfield Development Code (SDC) 5.12-120, Land Divisions - Partitions &
Subdivisions - Tentative Plan Submittal Requirements or 5.17-120, Site Plan Review
Submittal Requirements,
~
~
.~
~
~
~
o
o
Drawn in ink on quality paper no smaller than 11" x 17"
Scale appropriate to the area involved and sufficient to show detail of the plan and
related data, such as 1'" = 30', 1" = 50' or 1" = 100'
North arrow
Date of preparation
Street address and assessor's map and tax lot number
Dimensions (in feet) and size (either square feet or acres) of the development area
Location and size of existing and proposed utilities, including connection points
On-site drainage collection system and flow patterns, the size and location of drain
lines and catch basins, dry wells, and natural drainageways to be retained
Area and dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for
common open spaces
DIMs Related to Land Divisions
o
o Approximate location, number and dimensions of proposed lots
o How streets in the proposal area connect with existing streets
DIMs Related to Site Plan Review
~ Proposed and existing buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area),
setbacks from property lines, distance between buildings, and height
o Area and percentage of the site proposed for buildings, structures, driveways,
sidewalks, patios and other impervious surfaces
~ Parking and circulation plan Date Received:
JUN 2 5 2009
Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian
Original submittal
3 of 3
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, Oregon 97477
541-726-3759 Phone
y of Springfield Official Receipt
lJevelopment Services Department
Public Works Department
Job/Journal Number
iON2009-000 19
Payments:
Type of Payment
CreditCard
cRcceiotl
RECEIPT #:
Date: 06/25/2009
3200900000000000487
Description
CTY Development Issues Mtg
Paid By
TBG ARCHITECTS
Item Total:
Check Number Authorization
Received By Batch Number Number How Received
tj
025016 In Person
Payment Total:
Date Received:
JUN 2 5 2a09
Original Submittal
Page I of I
2:41:41PM.
" Amount Due
521.00
$521.00
Amount Paid
$521.00
$521.00
6/25/2009
. ~ ~-~~, ~-, ,--- --
f....'
(f)
J!-.
in
....
/1{)
~IN 3T MAIN ST
'r
'I
; I
I
L
I'
I
I
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD
VICINITY MAP
ZON2009-00019
5175 & 5195 Main Street
J=-
-
MAIN ST SITE
MAIN ST Map 17-02-33-32
Tax Lot 6200,
/ 6300
~I
I North
-.
~I w:o I ' ..J.
ZII r
~I
l Il ~
cb
?
.J
IL
~
(f)
Iii
/J)
Date Received:
JUN 2 5 2009
Original Submittal
::
June 25, 2009
City of Springfield
Development Services
Planning Division
225 5th Street
Springfield, Oregon 97477
1
RE:
Prospective 51't_52"d & Main Street Redevelopment
Development Issues Meeting (200913/1.3)
Project Address:
Assessor's Map &
Tax Lot:
Applicant:
Daytime Phone:
Mailing Address:
E-mail Address:
Applicant's Representative:
Daytime Phone:
Mailing Address:
E-mail Address:
Civil/Traffic Engineer:
Daytime Phone:
Mailing Address:
E-mail Address:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
5175 & 5195 Main Street
17-02-33"32 Tax Lots 6200 & 6300
OBO Enterprises, LLC
Nick Boyles
541-954-0217
1390 Grosbeak Court
Redmond, Oregon 97756
qual ityapartments@q,com
TBG Architects & Planners/lnc
Kristen Taylor
541-687-1010
132 East Broadway, Suite 200
Eugene, Oregon 97401
ktaylor@tbg-arch.com
Branch Engineering, Inc.
Damien Gilbert, PE
541-746-0637
310 5th Street
Springfield, Oregon 97477
damien@branchengineering,com
TBG
./ ,,/ It
^)", J
-'\- '", ~
_'''-6/
I t' T,-
ARCHITECTS &
PlANNERS/INC
132 East Broadway
Suite 200
Eugene, Oregon 97401
541-687-1010
541-687-0625 Fax
Date Received:
JUN 2 5 2009
Original Submittal
The applicant is requesting a DIM for two prospective conceptual plans to better
understand the general opportunities and challenges of this site and the proposed
designs. Conceptual Plan A, involves the development of two multi-tenant
commercial buildings including retail sales and eating and drinking establishment uses
with associated site infrastructure, parking and landscaping.
Conceptual Plan B includes a potential 2,500-square-foot drive-through eating and
drinking establishment, a 3,000-square-foot multi-tenant commercial building and a
two-story multi-family use with 12 one- and two-bedroom units.
lohn E. Lawless, AlA
Principal
James F. Alberson III, AlA
Principal
Darrell L'smith, NCARS, FAIA
Principal
City of Springfield
June 25, 2009
Page 2 of 4
DaU; Received:
I' "~ ,,;; 2009
"":.",, ! ..
SITE CONTEXT AND INFORMATION
Oriainsl $ubi'iiltt< I
~,
The subject site is relatively flat totaling approximately 1,52 acres located on the
south side of Main Street between 51st Place and 520d Street. Tax Lot 6300 is
currently developed with a single-family rental home. Tax Lot 6200 was developed
with a single-family home that recently burned down and the ruins were demolished,
The subject site is located within the Springfield City Limits and Urban Growth
Boundary. The subject site' is zoned Community Commercial (CC), which is
consistent with the Metro Plan Commercial designation. The subject parcel is located
within the East Main Street Refinement Plan, Area 3, with a Mixed Use designation.
This area allows community commercial and medium and high density residential
uses. The properties located to the east, west and north of the subject site are also
zoned cc. The properties located to the south are in the Low Density Residential
(LOR) Zoning District.
Main Street (McKenzie Highway) is a principal arterial street: 51st Place and 520d
Street are local streets: 51st Place is not improved to city standards, There is one
existing driveway for each Tax Lot. Tax Lot 6200 has an existing driveway located on
Main Street. Tax Lot 6300 has an existing driveway on 520d Street. The proposed
concept plans and the success of the project rely on maintaining the existing driveway
on Main Street, which will serve both Tax Lots,
We request that at a minimum,; staff members from planning, transportation, and
engineeringattend"the conference, If applicable; it might also be helpful to invite a
key ODOT 'representative to discuss the existing access off of Main Street (McKenzie
Highway). Please do not hesitate to invite additional staff members to attend the
conference in order to adequately address the questions.
In addition to the questions, we have enclosed two possible Conceptual Plans for
reference only,
DIM QUESTIONS (Specific Questions in bold)
1, As noted above, the subject site is zoned cc. Per the East Main .Street
Refinement Plan, this property can be developed as Community Commercial
and/or Mixed-Use Commercial (MUC) (allowing medium and high density multi-
family uses). After preliminary conversations with staff, it is our understanding
that if the applicant proposes an exclusive commercial development that the CC
and other associated applicable general development standards apply, MUC
standards do not apply in this case, Is this interpretation correct? Please clarify
what standards apply for a commercial development (i.e., parking between
the building and the street, etc.) Please address applicable drive-through
requirements for an exclusive commercial development proposal even though
a drive-through is not shown in Conceptual Plan. Reference Conceptual Plan A
for the potential commercial development proposal.
City of Springfield
June 25, 2009
Page 3 of 4
It is also our understanding that if the applicant proposes a mixed-use
development, as proposed in Conceptual Plan F, that the only applicable MUC
requirements are those identified within the refinement plan (i.e" vegetated
buffers are required adjacent to residential districts). Is this interpretation
correct? Please clarify what standards apply for a mixed-use development
such as proposed Conceptual Plan F (i.e., residential density requirements,
drive-through requirements, etc.)
2. Will a Traffic Impact Study be required for the proposed projects (Conceptual
Plans A and F)? If so, please provide a scope(s) of the required study at the
DIM. Will there be any impacts to this site and/or a future development on
this site as a result of the City of Springfield's objective of addressing
pedestrian safety on Main Street?
3, The site is currently served via a full access to Main Street (tax Lot 6200) and 52'"
Street (Tax Lot 6300), For the future viability of commercial development on this
site, the development .will depend on maintaining the ,existing, access.;to.,Main. .
Street as well as-access;to'S2D.? 'Street~ For any future development\'theapplicant", '
proposes to maintain the existing Main Street driveway in its current' location and.
potentially widen it slightly to allow for. a designated left-hand.. turn lane. The
existing driveway on 52,d Street is proposed to remain'iwConceptual'Plan A and
proposed to be relocated in Conceptual Plan F. It is likely that some.
development schemes will also benefit from an additional access:to. 51 "Place 'as, .
shown in Conceptual Plan F: :.
Is it likely that at' leasUwo'fiJlI accesses from the' site-to"Main Streef'and,52~d".
Street can be maintained? If a driveway is proposed on 51" Place, is the
owner required to make any improvements to this unimproved street?
Do the existing driveways and abutting public streets have approach permits?
If not, will ODOT require the City Streets to be permitted? If so, will the City
require the applicant to apply for their approach permits for the existing local
streets (52'. Street and 51" Place)?
4. The City of Springfield has just recently completed stormwater and wastewater
master plans. Is there water, stormwater and wastewater infrastructure
available adjacent to the site with adequate capacity to accommodate full
build-out of the site? Is it anticipated that stormwater retention and/or
detention will be required?
5, Referencing the two prospective Conceptual Plans and the relevant code
requirements, does the planning, fire and/or building department have any
concerns or helpful information regarding the proposed design?
Date Received:
JUN 2 5 2009
Original su.i:lmit\1i!L--
City of Springfield
June 25, 2009
Page 4 of 4
Thank you for your time and effort in clarifying these questions so that we can
proceed smoothly with the development of this proposed project.
Si ncerely,
l~
,
.------'")
Kristen Taylor
nl
Enclosure: City of Springfield DIM Application Form - 1 copy
Conceptual Plans A and'F both dated June 24, 2009 - 10 copies
cc: Nick Boyles, OBO Enterprises, LLC
Damien Gilbert, Branch Engineering, Inc.
Z:\PROJ\200913 080 51 st-52nd & Main\Corresp\Agency\200913-Development Isses Mtg.doc
Date Received:
JUN 2 5 2009
Original Submittal
(E) ODOT~'~ , . /' , ' ; , , ' . . , ' , ' , ' , ' , ' ,
SIGN TO ,...",.....
REMAIN , . .' , '.'...',.,.,. . .
, ~l c ,',
, 1 . .
, ,
, .
L..LJ
U
<( Iu
.....J ~
I-
(f)
Cl... --'
<C
.<..)
I- a
"'-
Vl
..-
LJ")
. .
I
.
j,
, .
i.
n
t,
'p
.'
"
^'
I: : : :
, .
BUILDING AREA'
7,400 SF
I' .
. ,
. ,
J o~-o:',
'MIN
.T'(p
1
I.
LEGEND
~ w W .
-
BUILDING FOOTPI?JNT
LANDSCAPE AREA
(PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL STREET)
S T R E E T (M c,K E N Z I E
3;'~,O" ,L)DI?JV~~~~~~~~:~I~~N:E::,:::.:.:::,:.:,:,:.:, :'~:.'\. '_' ~ISION
. . "" , , , . . , . . . . . . , , . . ,~~ ~CLEARANCE
{7 V [? :-'"" '.r-T".,.r """"1..,. ,,-,.,' .::. AREA,TYP
~
M A IN
H WY)
- m~'
... ... ... ... ... ... '" -
... ... '" .. '" ... ... ...-'
.. .. r:;:--:.--~--~--.....- ... "'t'
4
.
/
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
[I (: : : :: :'.
,
:1 :
,
(: ~..'l//////////;///..1': .:, ~//////////~)
, II:. "'. '.
,'"Q "-j-', '.
: I : I , : , ' 11
:1 : ~
, ,
: I ": ~
':1 :
:1 i
, ,
il i ..
I 10 I
"I '
, :1 (, ~
, ; , . , . 1
... tl /
I: tl
. '" ~I 18
I>:.:.:'
, . ,
... ..'", '"
BUILDING AREA
G,800 SF
30'-0"
L
r-
"'--
I.' 'I
, , . .I
-..
~
--------~~----~------------------~
%
~.~ ~
'" .... ... ~
~
b \!-z'
_, ~o
~ :::>
J
"
i
"
1
"
l' 'I
, ' 1
, '
: :: 1
.
'.,
-------
16
. 6
'---'"'
c:
'"
9
9
ASSESSOR'S MAP
17-02-33-32
TAX LOT 6300
9
O:l
N
b
,
iC
N
ASSESSOR'S MAP
17-02-33-32
TAX LOT 6200 ~
/;
4 ~
~
;C;
9'-0"
JO ..
r T'(pr
TRASH
AREA
.
= '. I ,/ ... '::...
.. .. .. ...
0.,;... It-:: 15.... .. ... ..
........ ~ .. ... .. ...
... '" ... ...
-. I , ,. , , ,
~~~~~~~~~~"~~~-:~~~~~:~~~~~~~~~~-~:~:~:~~.. ... .. .. .. .. ... ..
-,
.
-",--~-.;;--:;--~--;;- ...
... ... ... ... ... .. .. ... ... ... ... ... ... .. ... ... oW
. , , , . , , , , , , , ib '2:' . I 0'-0'
.. ... ... -" .. '" .. ... ... .. ... "'6'" ~ "~."'..." ...;'-
. , . . . , , , . . , '- .. MIN
.. .. .. .. ... .. ... ... .. .. ... ... .. .. ... ...
... .. .... ...
N
@G)
f-
L..LJ
'--, L..LJ'
c.::: 6'
~
I- in
Vl <i!
<..)
9
o
z'
N
LJ') .
~E) DI?JVEWAY
TO REMAIN
~ate Received:
JUN 2 5 2009
Origin II Submittal
CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN A
111:::::: 301-0"
15'
o
30'
60'
CHECK SET
THlSDAAWlNGlS
PRELIMINARY
~
INCOMPLETE
ITISNOTroBEl&OfOll
~-
~
"'""""""'"
f-
L..L.J
L..L.J
a::::
f-
e./")
Zu
-.....J
<(.....J
~'~
Vl
uct:::
CCl...
Nct:::
Lf")~
c<5~
tSo
r-CCl
Lf")O
TBG
ARCHITECTS &
PLANNERS / INC
lJ2Ea..tBmadway
Suile200
Eugcne,Oiegon97401
(541)687-1010
Fax(S4T)61l7-D625
0:>
....
.,.
f-....
W'"
Wz
g:o
en,<.J
ZW
-0<
<0
:;: -
';"0
"'~
~W
"'W::
",,<.J
"'~
....0<
~ CL
'" en
CONCEPTUAL
SITE PLA,N
PROJECT#-
DRAWN
CHECKED
DATE
SHEET
u
c
'"
.
c
Ii
0:
"'
t
2
{J
"
t)
ro
200913
KCTIJM E-
KGT C'I
o
)UNE 24, 2009 g
"
(j
A1 ~
(9
(PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL STREET)
MAIN STREET (McKENZIE HWY)
TBG
ARCHITECTS &
PLANNERS / INC
~E) DRIVEWAY TO BE WIDENED
(E) ODOT~Z. . . . . , ~ . ' . . . c . ":""". . ~. . - . ~ . - . - , . . - . . . . .~. "'7.'. 35' "0" ., '_ C?'I:..~ ~-,-_.:_.:::'~.: -:-. . -
_ ~ ~ ~~. ~ ~ ~'w ~ ~
~~NAi~ I<::~:':"::":'::'::'~'::: ::,' " 1r 1ri'~ . :':':
. . . ! v:. . , . . . . ' _ . . . ~ . . . . . . . . . ~ . . . ~ ~, I I ::,
" ----..'" "'.. " ','-'.'
r .' I . . . i I
. 'RL :.~5: ;~~" g II ~ 30'-0" ----.~t.: "." i '1/////~/~~ ~]
5 ~AREA ..i ~ ~
_. ___m'_m-" 0>/ ,,- _mm-' ~ LII '. ,:.1_ : . I!
Sl':<< _ :' 7 I~ . .
. V ~ 9 ~: .0 ~ ' ~A . I; r/#////////~t .~.: < ) ,~. . .' .;:~
~ ,1b'-019'-0"1 /L,
~ Ol!-' z J:" -I'- 0 ASSESSOR'S MAP 'y--"
NEW I ;t r= ~ TYP cb 17-0B3-32
DRIVEWAY '" TAX LOT 6200 Y
......~~
w W v v w W v
v w v w w v w v
v w v v v v V
v v v v v v v v v
---.....- .
, .
132 East Broadway
5u;((>200
Eugcne, O't!gon 97401
(541)687-'010
Fax (541) 687-0625
-VISION
CLEARANCE
AREA
CHECK SET
THIS DAAWING lS
PRELIMINARY
""
INCOMPLETE
BUILDING
AREA
3,000 SF
JTISNOTTOIlfUSEDFOII
~TI~
~
l.J...J
U
<( Iu
---l gz
I-
a.:.. ' tf),.
-'
<{
U
I- 9
V'J
..--
L!")
I-
l.J...J
l.J...J
~ Iu
gz
I--' 'I-
tf)
V) -'
<{
U
0 9
z
N
Lr)
1<, '1
~. 1
---------------, ... I
~
5
I-
u.J
u.J
~
I-
Cf)
Zu
- ---l
<(---l
~[{l
tJ)
u~
Co...
N~
L1"')1=
0<53
ti;o
;--co
L1"')O
, ,
/;
~
~
~
~
~
ASSESSOR'S MAP
17-02-33-32
TAX LOT 6300
o
,
iJ>
'"
o
,
iJ>
C\J
~RELOCATED (E)
DRIVEWAY
. : . : . :.~ 7 --'., ~ n ~~rln7fni1 n r '. .'. '=-lln nn~l"'1
'...... l L.Jl.,JL.JL.JL.JL.J I... ~_JL.JL.Jr.'.'.
... .. .. -, q r~.. ...... -l ~ _
. ' . ' . 5>;rl~=-~=-~-=~-=~-:'~~.~.T.-~:~: l'f'\ ::. polD. _C I fl r11 I' .. J~i ~~ .:U~ I:::
. 1..1 . . . ~ . . .
. ~ ~ ,E . . . . ., . . . . V :r-l~~~~'~~ ' \J..... 1--.)' . . .' , . .
" ~ I .. '" ... ..
. . .. r.."....L _' . " L.J L.J 'L .J . . . .
,...T'V1'....~ ....
I>: . , _ ::::::::
TRASH
AREA
I
. . . . . '1
. " " "
. . .
18'-0"
LNEW GARAGE
.
'"
....
.,.
e-....
w'"
Wz
f"o
V>lJ
zw
-'"
<0
::;: -
",0
"'~
~w
",0::
.,lJ
"'~
....'"
~o..
'" V>
MIN
(--
. . . ' __________ (E) RELOCATED
SINGLE-FAMILY
HOME
(....-
1
I
J(O~-?"." ' , 1 ' :... Jii< : : : : ::. ::::::
, MIN' . ".._ __ '\.___-.1.. .. . . , . . . . .
TYP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . o' . . . . . . . , . . . .
. '" .. '" .. '" '" '" ~ ...... .. '" .. '" '" .. .. '" .. " '" ~,Q:: '" .. ... ... .. ... .. ... ... ... ...
r 1 I - . c.. ~~
. . . ;'--.--.1 . . . . . . . ". . . . . . )_.__. .'.'.' . . . . . . . . . '.' ....:... . .: . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . ' . ". . . . . . . '. " _ 2 STORY MAX.
. . . .' " . . .' . . .... .' . .,'.........: MULTI-FAMILY
. - HOUSING, WI
GARAGES
6 :lte Received:
CONCEPTUAL
SITE PLAN
u
c
"
.
~
0:
""
~
:s
,<
lJ
~
200913 I-
KGT/IM E
KGT C'
IUNE24,2009 g
N
~
G
~
r
~
8
@
JUN 2 5 2009
f
l
I
I
,
i
,
ia
!'
,I
"'
I'
"
U
OrIginal Submittal
LEGEND
N .
@G)
CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN F
PROJECT//.
DRAWN
CHECKED
DATE
BUILDING FOOTPRINT
1" = 30'-0" .
15'
30'
60'
o
L
. ... + ... ~
SHEET
A2
LAND5CAFE AREA