The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPacket, Planning Commission PLANNER 9/18/2007 SPRINGFIELD CITY HALL * CITy' COUNCIL CHAMBERS * 225 FIFTH STREET * 541 726-3753 Tuesday September 18, 2007 7:00 pm 1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES- 3. BUSINESS FROM THE AUDlENCF;. - REGULAR SESSION June 19,2007 July 17, 2007 Regular Session Work and Regular Session 4. OUASI-.JUDIClAL PUBLIC HEARING- a. APPLICATION: APPLICANT(s) NAME: . CASE NUMBER: APPEAL SITE: APPEAL PROPOSAL: PLANNER: b. APPLICATION: APPLICANT(s) NAME: CASE NUMBER: APPEAL SITE: APPEAL PROPOSAL: PLANNER: Request for Zoning Map Amendment Robert Hastings ZON2007-00039 18-02-05-22 TL 1100 The applicant request a Zoning Map Amendment to change the zoning of approximately 0.34 acres of land located at 770 and 780 South 42'4 Street in Springfield. Assessor's Map 18-02-05-22, annexed portion of Tax Lot 1100 from Low Density Residential (LDR) to Medium Density . Residential (MDR). Linda Pauly Request for Zone Change Scott and Lisa Leatham ZON2007 -00040 17-02-32-34 TL 600 The applicant request a Zoning Map Amendment to change the'zoning of approximately 0.67 acres of land located at 6002 Main Street in Springfield. Assessor's Map 117-02-32-34 Tax Lot 600. The current zoning is Low Density Residential (LDR). The applicant wishes to change the zoning to Medium Density Residential (MDR) Steve Hopkins CONDUCT OF QUASI-.JUDICIAL PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECEIVED . Staff will explain procedural requirements mandated by State Law . <:;ommencement of the hearing . 'DeClar~ti~n of conflict of interest or "ex-parte" contact . Staff report _ _ "'" . . Testimony from the applicant . B: '1-/ ~-D 7 The meeting location is wheelchair-accessible. For the hearing-impaired. an interpreter can be provided wX 48 hours notice prior to the meeting. For meetings in the CouncirMeeling Room, a "Personal PA Receiver "for the hearing-impaired is availab.le. To arrange/or these services. phone 726-2700. PC Agenda - Brenda,Jones Page I 9/1 8/2007 . Testimony of those in support . Testimony of those in opposition . Summation by the Staff .. Rebuttal from the applicant . . Close. of the public hearing / or extend the written record . Planning Commission discussion (possible questions to staff or public) . Motion to approve or deny request based on staff report and/or oraVwritten testimony . final order signed by Chair incorporating findings and reasoning to support decision S. BUSINESS FROM THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR 6. REPORT OF COUNCIL ACTION 7. ,BUSINESS FROM THE COMMISSION 8. ADJOURN REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSIONERS RECEIVED frank Cross, Chair Bill Carpenter, Vice Chair Lee Beyer Johnny Kirschenmann T em Leezer Eric Smith Sheri Moore ... .... ...-..... By: q -I t-D7 The meeting location is wheelchair-accessible. For the hearing-impaired. an interpreter can be provided with 48 hours notice prior to the meeting. For meetings in the Council Meeting Room. a "Personal PA Receiver" for the hearing-impaired is available. To arrange for these services. phone 726-2700. PC Agenda - Brenda Jones Page 2 9/18/2007 SPRINGFIEW CITY HALL' JESSE MAINE ROOM' 225 FIFTH STREET' 541 726-3753 Tuesday September 18, 2007 6:30nID WORK SESSION Tonight's Work Session involves a discussion of the following items: I. - APPLICATION: APPLlCANT(s) NAME: CASE NUMBER: APPEAL SITE: APPEAL PROPOSAL: PLANNER: 2. APPLICATION: APPLICANT(s) NAME: CASE NUMBER: . APPEAL SITE: APPEAL PROPOSAL: PLANNER: 3. ADJOURN Request for Zoning Map Amendment Robert Hastings ZON2007 -00039 18-02-05-22 TL 1100 The applicant request a Zoning Map Amendment to change the zoning of approximately 0.34 acres of land located at 770 and 780 South 4200 Street in Springfield. Assessor's Map 18-02-05-22, annexed portion of Tax Lot 11 00 "from Low Density Residential (LOR) to Medium Density Residential (MDR). Linda Pauly Request for Zone Change Scott and Lisa Leatham ZON2007 -00040 17-02-32-34 TL 600 The applicant request a Zoning Map Amendment to change the zoning of approximately 0.67 acres of land located at 6002 Main Street in Springfield. Assessor's Map 117-02-32-34 Tax Lot 600. The current zoning is Low Density Residential (LOR). The applicant wishes to change the zoning to Medium Density . Residential (MDR) Steve Hopkins PLANNING COMMISSIONERS RECEIVED frank Cross, Chair Bill Carpenter, Vice Chair Lee Beyer Johnny Kirschenmann T em Leezer Eric Smith Sheri Moore '"-''''' By: q~J6~o7 NOTE: Work Sessions are intended for the Planning Commission and Staff to discuss specific issues that mayor may not appear on the Regular Agenda. There is no formal opportunity for citizen participation during Work Sessions. The meeting location is wheelchair-accessible. For the hearing-impaired. an interpreter can be pravided with 48 hours notice prior to the meeting. For meetings in the Council Meeting Room, a "Personal PA Receiver" for the hearing~impaired is available. To arrange/or these services, phone 726~2700. BJones Page I 9/18/2007 ~~: Zoning Map Amendment Planning Case No. Z0N2007..QOO3-9 770 and 780 South 42.... Street Applicant: Hastings r'"",.;'_'~l =..- .-.-- F'~" =-_ - =-=- '1/ Sffe Photos ~:_-:-.:- VICInity Map 770 & 780 South 4200 Street Ell N Assessor's Map 18-02.05-22TL 1100 Ij~~f1rf1~19~~~;} :; ; ,_, ;,,,,"';;.}C' I;~'J"';"-:-;'i' ~E~~ Ell South 42fld Street Improvement Project Neighborhood Vicinity nO&780South42""Streel "- ~"'.-.'- . Mt. Vernon School Property 10 east RECEIVED ..... ... ...-........ By: CH K '01. 1 Site Photos " . ., Metro Plan Designation ::::'~:~':~~':=~'UII0l;1"0..m Proposed' Zone Change Existing LOR Proposed MDR RECEIVED - - ..-...... By: C)-I g-D 7 .) MEMORANDUM DATE OF HEARING: CITY OF SPRINGFIELD September 18, 2007 FROM: Springfield Planning com~ission ~inda Pauly, Planner III~~ PLANNING COMMISSION TRANSMITTAL MEMORANDUM TO: SUBJECT: Planning Commission Public Hearing Zoning Map Amendment - Hastings Case Number ZON 2007-00039 ISSUE The Planning Commission is asked to conduct a Public Hearing to consider the Applicant's request to change the zoning of approximately 0.34 acre of land located at 770 and 780 South 42"d Street from Low-Density Residential (LOR) to Medium-Density Residential (MDR). The subject property is more particularly described as the annexed portion of Assessor's Map 18-02- 05-22, Tax Lot 1100. DISCUSSION The purpose of the proposed action is to rectify an inconsistency between the. Metro. Plan designation and the zoning map. Since the existing LOR zoning is not consistent with the MDR Plan designation, the Director has determined that this application qualifies to be processed as a City Sponsored Zoning Map Amendment, as established by department policy in 2006, Approval of zoning map amendments requires a demonstration of consistency with applicable Metro Plan policies and the Metro Plan Diagram. The Planning Commission is asked to consider the applicant's request and the findings of fact contained within this report to confirm that the proposed MDR zoning is consistent with the Metro Plan Diagram and text and that the application of the MDR zone is appropriate in this case. RECOMMENDATION I ACTION REQUESTED Upon review of the applicant's request, staff finds that the proposed Medium Density Residential Zoning Map Amendment is consistent with the criteria at Springfield Development Code 12.030 and recommends approval of the applicant's request. . ,/ ATTACHMENTS Attachment 1: Zone Change Request Staff Report and Findings Attachment 2: Existing Zoning Map and Proposed Zoning Map Attachment 3: Legal Description Attachment 4: Final Order RECEIVED '. ... - ..-...... By: CH g-D7 Attachment I Zoning Map Amendment - Type III Staff Report and Findings Hearinp Date: September 18, 2007 Case Number: ZON 2007-00039 Subiect ProDertv: Assessor's Map No. 18-02-05. 22, portion of Tax Lot 1100 ADDlicant fOwner Robert Hastings 2375 Pioneer Pike Eugene, OR 97401 ADDlicant's ReDresentative None Date Submitted: July 2, 2007 REOUEST: The Applicant requests a Zoning Map Amendment to change the zoning of approximately 0.34 acre of land located at 770 and 780 South 42"d Street in Springfield, Assessor's Map 18-02-05-22, annexed portion of Tax Lot 1100 from Low-Density Residential (LOR) to Medium-Density Residential (MDR). The purpose of the proposed action is to rectify an inconsistency between the Metro Plan designation and the zoning map. Since the existing zoning is not consistent with the Plan designation, the Director has determined that this application qualifies to be processed as a City Sponsored Zoning Map Amendment, as established by department policy in 2006. The Planning Commission is asked to consider the applicant's request and the findings of fact contained within this report to confirm that the proposed zoning is consistent with the Metro Plan and that the application of the MDR zone is appropriate in this case. (eastern .34 acre of lot) -- r I . '1+ I . nc~IVEC ... - ........... Attachment 1 -1 By:_q.// g/01 ~~~Jlt~~ -1' . I Railroad Line & Booth -------.- C Kelly Road ~ _ j . ~ I FOR5HHr~~ I I I )' 1'1 SUBJECT PROPERTY Xl D.l 770 & 780 South 42'. Street (eastern .34 acre of lot is inside the City Limits) >i' <( J!: 'fl -~~ Mt Vernon - - ---. -'J - EI3menta l - , I I ~~l!~:".fu~' J- - Volunteer Park \..iEIG d~RHuuu o'lCINITY Not to scale -. ffi LEGEND 1- - City Umits Un. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: The subject property is located on the west side of South 42'd Street, south of Booth Kelly Road and the railroad line. The land subject to this application is approximately 0.34 acre of a 0.91 acre lot. The subject property is the eastern (annexed) portion of a lot which is currently divided by a north-south City Limits line. The eastern portion of the lot is inside the City limits and is zoned LDR. The western portion of the lot is not annexed and is zoned MDRI UF-I O. The land is currently developed with a single family residential use. Access to the property is from South 42'. Street. REVIEW PROCESS: This City Sponsored Zoning Map Amendment application is a Quasi- judicial Zoning Map Amendment which affects a single property, involves the application of existing policy to a specific factual setting, and does not require a Metro Plan diagram amendment. SDC 12.030 (I) states that Quasi-judicial Zoning Map Amendments may be approved by the Planning Commission and that the Planning Commission's decision is the final local decision. This application is reviewed under Type III procedures listed in SDC 3.090 and 12. The application was accepted as complete on July 2, 2007. Approval of the request would allow development in accordance with the standards of SDC Article 16 at residential densities of 10-20 dwelling units per acre. The applicant's t" ~I'~.GI is limited to the annexed eastern portion of the lot. The westerly portion of th,lot i5oWi~ Springfield's UF-I 0 Urbanizable Fringe Overlay District, thus annexation is reqr1d;pri:v =IVED Attachment 1 - 2 - .... ..-..... By: q-[g'Dl development of the property with Medium Density residential uses. The owner is interested in seeking development approval for the subject property, thus the zoning must be made consistent with the Plan designation. A minimum density of 3 units would be required and a maximum of 6 units would be permitted on the 0.34 acre subject property. Future development of the site would require a Type II land use review process (Site Plan Review and/or approval of a land division), including notice to surrounding property owners. Development would not necessarily be subject to Site Plan Review. SOC 31.020 (2)(a) exempts duplex dwellings from Site Plan Review when the lot in the MOR zone allows only one such dwelling. DISCUSSION: In this report, staff will demonstrate that the proposed MOR zoning is appropriate and consistent with the Metro Plan and that the proposal meets the criteria for approval of quasi-judicial zoning map amendments in accordance at Springfield Development Code 12.030 (3). RECOMMENDATION: Upon review of the applicant's request, staff finds that the proposed Medium Density Residential zoning is appropriate for the subject property and recommends approval of the applicant's request. ZONING OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES: Land to the north is inside the City Limits and zoned MDR (Glacier View Subdivision) and LOR (Tax Lot 1002). Land to the south is zoned MDR 00. No. 99-03-088). Land east of 420d Street is zoned Public Land and Open Space (PLO). SITE PHOTO: \ \ \ \ RECEIVECJ - - ...-...... Attachment 1 - 3 p.". CH8-01 Lot abutting the subject property to the north <:"'... - Old Mount Vernon School Property across the street from subject property .. Property to south of subject property RECEIVED Attachment 1 - 4 ....... ...........- q,!~ '07 By: ZONING OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES: r -I 1.. 't:llJJ -Jot to scale ZONING LEGEND ffi lDR low Density Residential MDR Medium Density Residential CC Community Commercial NC Neighborhood Commercial PlO Public land and Open spaR E C E IVE 0 - - "-"'''' By: Cf;/8'01 Attachment 1 - 5 ;:;:-...,......."""TVl'..... -S9l!IH~~ ~~"?C_~ -. II " , - \I ...- ~"~~ --1 III --.~... .. -.~- -- .. -- .-- City Limits ~ ~ ....J::"l.. <<lI'.. -I I ..:.:-+... ....~ ..... ::t ~- -'-- -'''Ig, "', .......... .....:..:_.;....., -~-- ~ ___ _ .. _~ VI 'tOO-1 4700 ,.,~. --, ...~ I ~'..~ ~. 000 .~. -,;...... - 11,~ -.. ~ '.0 l, <),~.. ~r:.ooo ~~_..:.. .... '.. ....,;.. ". ~ ~4.~ ~ 1003 1111 ~'::. . .,. L.O to! AC <<1,,.. o.~ I'" . uoo; . l: . ",a" \ '100 '5100. ".~. 'Ii ~..' -...-. ..J 4500 -............. ~ ~ U'..~ : -"'?: I~ . __h_. ~'-l' 0""" '\" . 'tuuu' .n', : I. -~,. -, I. -. -:'1!'" 'y I ',~~.. II . '1 I " .... ~..aI; ~:'~..~ -- . GlAC'. ,Ij~J~:"7r,7~'~J.. ". ~ 4000 (.. 100:2 .1 " IOM:'::]llt'lO~.~ 01IJM': 'OM '\00' '.'- .1010.'; 11 I !!.l';'!' ,:l;"" .' -;l"~J il ' ~ ,~.l.~,_,_ -1' m( "!l I * C . ~ .... ... ,- -~- - - -.. _I i .- 'llJoo' n "";,,4 ntT. :11 ~'g=t'):r ~....~ 701 ,.co"', ":~;.._. . r -~- '.l4"l- 700 T7t'o6!' l00~ ... "" :1f ;~ SUBJECT PROPERTY I ~ '< .~~ Sj.b~ \ )) ; ;;j Ii , \ JW"j1 .a 1200 .0.12...c. . 1201 000 AC ~ : , ., -.. "1- 0'.fl2c !, {j ~ Lane County Assessor's MaD 18-02-05.22 Tax Lot 1100 Not to scale '" fro . .Cl.-.... -. (" ! ,..~ . A"'! t - '. , c:o! '\ . , ffi iECE V :0 - - ..-..... By:. C;1-I8.01 Attachment 1 - 6 SUBJECT PROPERTY 770 & 780 South 42,d Street (eastern .34 acre of lot) . SITE AERIAL PHOTO Not to scale EB RECEIVED - - --"'.. By: CHi-01 Attachment 1 -7 METRO PLAN DESIGNATION OF SUBIECT PROPERTY: MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 'I -- c ro roJ v . f- '.Il I f- ro N , - r r- (fl N V -II J SPER R . r---....#J 6:~.,f..- ~ VJ ~~ 00 Lrl Enlargement of Plan Diagram with 42,d Street and Railroad shown as identifiable features EB Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan Plan Diagram (Tht'. '_',' ... ",. andplllpOS<OflhePbnDtag:=.and_OllI of~ land U~ and \)mbol\ !J1o\\u. are contti!led m Cbapter 1I-G.) ,....' ,~"'..~" Metro F'bl Boundary D looN OenNty ReNdent!.tl D M&dlum Oft",,,-v . C] lion OenUty ReNdem.... I!i Coml'18rda1 B!I M.p,RetdCent.... D Heavy Il'ldultri... ~ Sped.1l Huvy 1"Ct..-t,w D Ught MedUn nciusttW ,1 ~ Campullndultrhl D UroIverdty ReM.rch II AQrlctltUltl [] forest land D Au,"-, ..I Urban Growth Boundollrv /V /V' R.tIlrcMl, ~fI .nd Pond. D ~ull".m,nd rduc.rion ~ Rural Commercial III P.,.q 6nd Open Sp.t<>e ~ RurlllndLKtrW D N.t.....' Resource ~ ~1 Aue......., D S.rvj.ndO'~ O_"'r~ ~ MbcfllU."Are" 8 Nodal ( Are. o .........metteGreenwW'l PLAN DESIGNATION LEGEND RECEIVED .. - ............ Attachment 1 - 8 By: ~~I&'01 SDC 12.030 Criteria of Approval - Zoning District Change SDC 12.030 establishes the criteria to be used in approving zone changes. In consideration of this request, the Planning Commission or Hearings Official shall adopt findings, which demonstrate that all of the applicable criteria have been addressed: I SDC 12.030 (3)(a) Consistency with applicable Metro Plan policies and the Metro Plan Diagram. The Metro Plan provides the public with general guidelines for individual planning decisions. Reference to supplemental planning documents of a more localized scope, including neighborhood refinement plans, is advisable when applying the Plan to specific parcels of land or individual tax lots (Metra Plan page 1-2, #4). The Plan serves as a general planning framework to be augmented, as needed, by more detailed planning programs to meet the specific needs of the various local governments (Metro Plan page 1-2, #8). Finding: No refinement plan has been adopted for the South Springfield area. There are no supplemental planning documents of a more localized scope which include the subject property. Finding: In this case, the Plan Diagram provides sufficient specificity to apply the Plan to the subject property because two identifiable features are shown: 42,d Street and the railroad line. The Metro Plan Diagram clearly indicates Medium Density Residential plan designation in the area of land south of the railroad line and west of South 42,d Street. Although the Plan diagram has no identifiable feature to establish the southerly limit of this MDR plan designation area, previous decision making by the City has established that the proposed MDR plan designation and zoning are appropriate and correct for these lots. In 1999, the City approved a zoning map amendment which applied Medium Density Residential zoning to land which abuts the subject property along its southern boundary. Finding: The Metro Plan Designation of the subject property is Medium Density residential. The proposed Medium Density residential zoning is consistent with the Medium Density Plan designation. The existing Low Density Residential zoning represents a Plan/zone conflict which must be corrected prior to development of the site. The following Metro Plan policies support the applicant's request: Metro Plan page Land Supply and Demand Policy A2: Residentially designated land within the UGB should be zoned consistent with the Metro Plan and applicable plans and policies. Metro Plan Land Supply and Demand Policy Policy A4: Use annexation, provision of adequate public facilities and services, rezoning, redevelopment, and infill to meet the 20-year projected housing demand. Metro Plan Residential Density Policy AI 0: Promote higher residential density inside the urban growth boundary that utilizes existing infrastructure, improves the efficiency ;::~~i~::::~~~.and facilities, and conserves rural resource lanREt;EriVE D - - ..-..... Attachment 1 - 9 By: (+1<6' Dl Metro Plan Residential Density Policy All: Generally locate higher density residential development near employment or commercial services, in proximity to major transportation systems or within transportation-efficient nodes. Metro Plan Residential Density Policy A12: Coordinate higher density residential development with the provision of adequate infrastructure and services, open space, and other urban amenities. Metro Plan Residential Density PolicyAl3: Increase overall residential density in the metropolitan area by creating more opportunities for effectively designed in-fill, redevelopment, and mixed use while considering impacts of increased residential density on historic, existing and future neighborhoods. Finding: Approval of the applicant's request would allow an increased residential density on the subject property from a maximum of 3 units (at LDR maximum density of 10 du/acre) to a maximum of 6 units (at MDR maximum density of 20 du/acre). Finding: Approval of the applicant's request would create an opportunity for effectively designed in-fill development in accordance with Metro Pion policies. If the owner requests and receives approval to annex the westerly portion of the lot, the entire 0.91 acre site could be developed with 10 to 18 units. Metro Plan Residential Density Policy A14: Review local zoning and development regulations periodically to remove barriers to higher density housing and to make provisions for a full range of housing options. Finding: The presence of inconsistent LDR zoning within areas designated MDR on the Metro Plan limits restricts redevelopment opportunities through limitation of density and creates additional restraints on design. The existing LDR zoning creates a restraint on infill development on adjacent MDR zoned land because the Code requires building height to be reduced to LDR maximum heights (30 feet) where MDR or HDR land within 50 feet of the abutting LDR district boundary. Finding: Approval of the proposal will create an opportunity to increase the number of units permitted and thus increase overall density and additional housing options within the metropolitan area. Metro Plan page III-A-8 Residential Density Policy A16: Allow for the development of zoning districts which allow overlap of the established Metro Plan density ranges to promote housing choice and result in either maintaining or increasing housing density in those districts. Under no circumstances, shall housing densities be allowed below existing Metro Plan density ranges. Finding: The existing Springfield Zoning for the subject property presently permits a density allocation lower than the MDR Plan designation. Finding: The existing LOR zoning is inconsistent with the Metro Plan text. Conclusion: Staff finds that the MDR zoning requested by the applicant is con~n~~e V E 0 applicable Metro Pion policies and the Plan Diagram provides the level of spe~ Cvv.ti - - ..-"- Attachment 1 - 10 By:_ Q-f8-01- apply the MDR district to the subject property. The proposal meets the approval criterion at SDC 12.030 (3)(a). SDC 12.030 (3)(b) Consistency with applicable Refinement Plans, Plan District maps, Conceptual Development Plans and functional plans. Finding: There is no Refinement Plan, Plan District map. or Conceptual Development Plan for the subject property. Metro Plan designations establish the basis for functional plans (transportation. public facilities, etc.) in the metro area, thus zoning in accordance with the Plan designation shall be consistent with the applicable functional plans. SDC 12.030 (3)(c) The property is presently provided with adequate public facilities, selVices and transportation networks to support the use, or these facilities, selVices and transportation networks are planned to be provided concurrently with the development of the property. Finding: The subject property has 100 feet of frontage on South 42,d Street, a Major Arterial -,ublic street. :I SUBJECT PROPERTY ~ - "" 1 .... Legend Major Arterial Minor Arterial Collector - Local ~ /'..../ MPO Boundary ;oadwav Classification MaR Umon G,.- BOUf'{ =@fIVED Attachment 1 -11 ... - ,........... B~ t" .\' '- q'lg'DI Finding: South ,42,d Street has recently been fully improved. Existing transportation systems provide access to the property. Specific access requirements will be addressed when the property is developed. Finding: The City's Conceptual Street Map shows a westward extension of Mt. Vernon Road. The projected future right of way is located south of the subject property. Finding: A public 12-inch stormwater line and a 6-inch public sanitary sewer are located in South 42,d Street along the frontage of the subject property. Finding: The property is served by Springfield Fire and Life Safety. Specific access to the site for fire and life safety vehicles will be determined when the property is developed. Finding: The site is within Springfield School District 19. Finding: The site is within the Willamalane Parks and Recreation District. Finding: Expected traffic impacts of the proposed rezoning to MDR are as follows: ITE trip generation rates for detached single-family are: Daily Trips = 9.57 per D.U. PM Peak Hour = 1.0 I per D.U. Data for "Rental Townhouse" is limited but what exists indicates a rate about 70% that of detached single-family; CondofT own house (ownership units) is a bit lower still around 55% - 60% of detached single family. So, three D.U of detached single-family would generate 29 trips per day and 3 trips per PM Peak Hour; six D.U of Rental Townhouses would produce 20 trips per day and 2 trips per PM Peak Hour. At this small scale the difference in traffic volume would not have a significant impact to a neighborhood. Finding: Lane Transit District (L TD) reviewed the application and found that the proposed zone change will not affect existing transit service. Finding: Solid waste management service is available at the subject property. The City and Sanipac have an exclusive franchise arrangement for garbage service inside the city limits. Finding: The site receives police protection from the City of Springfield, consistent with service provision throughout the city and with service that is now provided to adjacent properties. Finding: Qwest and Comcast currently provide telephone and cable communication service in this area for and an array of wireless companies provide a number of different communication services. The City has no exclusive franchise arrangements with telecommuniR~ '1i~'esE. 'V E D companies. The field is competitive and therefore guarantees a wide selection u \i~t1y;an~ "I upon annexation. L- "" .. ......"".... Attachment 1 - 12 B"O . 1" ct/(g.ol Conclusion: The property is presently provided with adequate public facilities. services and transportation networks to support the use. Any specific public and private improvement requirements and utility connection points will be determined when the property is developed. The proposal meets the criterion at SDC 12.030 (3)(c) SDC 12.030 (3)(d) Legislative Zoning Map amendments that involve a Metro Plan Diagram amendment shall : I. Meet the approval criteria specified in Article 7 of this Code; and 2. Comply with Oregon Administrative Rule (OAR) 660-012-0060, where applicable. Finding: This City Sponsored Zoning Map Amendment application is a Quasi-judicial Zoning Map Amendment which affects a single property. involves the application of existing policy to a specific factual setting. and does not require a Metro Plan diagram amendment. Conclusion: SDC 12.030 (4)(d) is not applicable. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: SDC 12.040 states: The Approval Authority may attach conditions as may be reasonably necessary to allow the Zoning Map Amendment to be granted. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION Staff finds that the proposed Zoning Map Amendment is consistent with the criteria of SDC 12.030. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the requested Zoning Map Amendment as shown in Attachment 2- B without conditions. RECEIVED ... - ..--"'... By: q'l g'D.1 Attachment 1 - 13 Attachment 2-A EXISTING SPLIT ZONING: LOW AND MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 0.34 acre Hastings Property at 770 and 780 South 42,d Street, Springfield OR Assessor's Map /8-02-05-22 eastern portion of TL 1100 ZON2007 -00039 ~ SUBJECT PROPERTY 770 & 780 South 42,d Street (eastern .34 acre of lot) IiH I___J . I I .JJ~h- - I I I I B {'yVl=J \lot to scale ZONING LEGEND -~ II II~~ ~- fillIIP ' I ~ --i \2J ---1]] [ I L-t I d N lDR low Density Residential C) RECEIVED MDR Medium Density Residential CC Community Commercial NC Neighborhood Commercial ... - ......... PlO Public land and Open Space By:_ q/(g-D7 Attachment 2-1 1- Attachment 2-B PROPOSED ZONING: MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 0.34 acre Hastings Property at 770 and 780 South 42,d Street, Springfield OR Assessor's Map 18-02-05-22 eastern portion of TL 1100 ZON2007-00039 ~. SUBJECT PROPERTY 770 & 780 South 42,d Street (eastern .34 acre of lot) " r I JII I ----. - .... ~" ~- -1= - j ,. j \; -OJ L-' lDR low Density Residential N C) RECEIVED MDR Medium Density Residential CC Community Commercial NC Neighborhood Commercial .. - ..-..... PlO Public land and Open Space q-{g '07 By: Attachment 2-2 I Jun ~~ U"t ....,.L t...,t J un ,,'" '......7 ... . U~.C~p tllaKe Has~lnbs WC~I'tHN "'UNttH III'''' ta.:~41-4B4-7321 !' i":.: .' . 'j ..iY;fi;:: ....... . : ~ ~" ", ~'( ~ . I: ..., . . /, I . : '::.: ."ii..J >.;: ::.L"~ . -:'.._l;t::::.<::: c. .'.;: . ..:"(;"Cl ..} :,.:c.. ::'.' . l..EGAL~~..u~ '1.~~w~:ii~i>;~, .i:;'~.)\:i): . '. .'. . . .':;'i~$;k.~1l: " ~":. :., ". . 'A P8""" of land Iyfng ., !he No" '..' ane-quan"r of lIle Norlhwest a~ .. :.:":>.,:~, :.' . "':(NW. 1/;. NW l/;) of Secllan 5.. Tawnship .18 Saulh. Rangs'2 Wesl of the . .' (',,: --': '. . ; WillGrTllitla Mel1disn, Ulna ~. Orggan.;and bsirlg a po<tian of ItIat lrad of . , . :'land conll8)'lld 10 ROBERT JAMES HASTINGs o.nd JACQUaJNE CAROl. ..,....:..~.~.~:..:,:!...:.::.:........,.... . ,.... JHAs11NGS.as ..,.,,, bylhlt<lnGr&ty..byll1llll31:aindeed.... ...1 July 20. . ". . '.1Il1l2, an Reel 1778. Reaardc!r'1O r".., ,. ~ 923988ll. LANE COUNTY .. ....c ';". ,;:., .;:. .: ;OREGON DEED ReCORDS. kll:fudlld in 10 I(IJipoflond JS1selln_lyil)gon .. ., . ..... . . . _u .J , or ~-'-'42'" --. --' .... , __ .. ':"::"::'~~~~~~E'I',~~'}}"~,~~'~, .~.;' .;ptMl wesIINty.....o WI Ihe ~ ~ ,I.. ,f: _ I;;JW.~I'., wu.:nn.. lIS .tUr\I8p;- "'7 ~le . .'. ,.-:::::j .:~.~.:,::::'.:'. .::'. i.:: 1.~1n2006;.1he.., , .beq ,I,.~. '. asfallaws: . "1 ...-;~:,.~ >.... .... .'., ;'Be9I~ning at'Eng~' CenletlIne Sblian l1GiOa.00 POT. ~ sbilan bsln9 . ." ;,;\:Jj; ,:';'.i-;-.. '.: ':i :12,6811.15- fest Nar1h' and. M.llS feet E....t of the Bl3SII Cap' marlllng ths . -"". .lr~!fl]" ';'&.':/;1"{.":' "..::,;;,'~ Comer or th8 A. AIIIIur Oanatlanl.iu1d Cll!Ilm Numbc!r 83 in SecIlan .: "~_-" -it: ~""'".:,:,:,._?.. ,:..:.,::\..~ .' . . . -6 ell..- \&1'111.__ ........lJL.-._ Coo ':,~,,,,:':.:.i :>>i\iQJ:i','-"t'!;::.':'O"i5;T~lIlp 18 .Soutft. Ra/vl2 Weslu, u'" .............1Ie .........!"". Lane . Illy, . - . '. " "t;~. .~;;"::;,,,,:;,:'i"'....!;.,4''':lpn.gon;' run Iher1ce NarIh 1.,42' ,16" ..&ld, 1700.00 feet lD E '.' _. ..' .. ... _.,.;J...,.l.r".....~'..~Ce"""rt1 -~ L~~oo.POTand"'" --',- 11'-"- Ca.-. . ...,'","""" .:;''; ;~:.,"i.;~...:~".;;'.'i:'."" .,~ ne .....,....n. '...~, . .",/11 'C'-", a ... ,:",ne ...... ,. ;~:~~:~\::,.:~:::~.,y:".~~~n. .. ..' . ::; .'. .' . . .. . ...... :,. .,.'(: '. ;y:lllll'~ 1M of lhB abaW d8saibed _ or lard CI'OClIeS GRANTOR'S SlOulhBrl)/ and :;: ,...:.'- ':. ,. ., '-'- -pslly lines appcslloi '.. .., '. B EngInesrll' CenMline StIIIians L 21+ea POT ~ ~';1.1i~;fi~~ '~:;./t~~t~: ~T, .. -...; .. ~- . ~:y." " .' ~ . . .~;:/ ."f;~i' . :;'.1li8 piirwfOt blld III wIIld> lI1iS de.....~n appCiils Dontwns 1,508 squ,,", f<Mlt, ,""IV or less. " ~:...t:::;.:.~~..:.:.;. .~:'..~:~;;:'i>t .... :'. ." ; . . . ,- i : .:The l:i.Bings US8d hemin an! busd an a bBal1ng of SaUlll 0" ~ 12" East betwuen LC.C."'. .::"22e.'llnifl.C.c;:.M. 1&OU;O'ELl, sailt boaring b'-d an th" Onlgon C.. Lcte s~ -'....~ ~1J. Sotch Zone. : 16:39 P.06 ro.. . ~.-~ :.I<.:l':--:. 'i",,:" . ".' . '.>:'.::} ',;'.t: "'?,::t:':.~;::. .. .' :.. ''""''~I' ". .... . . i ......{. ..} . .. ,. ..' '.;. ~. "" . ,.: .,:'......,hec [~'l UGo\LIIZSClI.. ,....,. . .' L1377-ams so.... cr',_ - nil'" . OJt\II1llOS ....:: '.' l~= 1100 . KECEI\fEE7 .:t ~.: '. . - - ..-..- q/{8'fJl By:_ ATTACHMENT 3-1 FINAL ORDER BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, OREGON ZONING MAP AMENDMENT REQUEST CASE NO. ZON2007-00039 FINDINGS CONCLUSION AND ORDER NATURE OF THE APPLICATION Zoning Map Amendment from Low Density Residential (LOR) to Medium Density Residential (MDR) for Assessor's Map 18-02-05-22, Tax Lot 1100, Robert Hastings Property Owner. 1. On July 2, 2007 the following application for a Zoning Map Amendment was accepted: Change the zoning of approximately 0,34 acre of land located at 770 and 780 South 4200 Street in Springfield from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential, Planning Case No. ZON2007-00039, 2. The application was submitted and completed in accordance with Section 3,050 of the Springfield Development Code. Timely and sufficient notice of the public hearing has been provided, pursuant to Section 14.030 of the Springfield Development Code, 3. On September 18, 2007, a public hearing on the Zoning Map Amendment request was held before the Springfield Planning Commission. The Development Services Department staff report including criteria of approval, findings and recommendations, together with oral and written testimony submitted has been considered and is part of the record of this proceeding. CONCLUSION On the basis of this record, the requested Zoning Map Amendment application is consistent with the criteria of Section 12.030 of the Springfield Development Code. This general finding is supported by the specific findings of fact and conclusions in the attached staff report (Attachment 1) and attached hereto, FINAL ORDER It is ORDERED by the Planning Commission of Springfield that Planning Case No. ZON2007-00039, Zoning Map Amendment Request, be approved. This ORDER was presented to and approved by the Planning Commission on September 18, 2007. Planning Commission Chairperson ATTEST AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECEIVED - - ..-...... Attachment 4-1 By: q--/Jr07