HomeMy WebLinkAboutNotice PLANNER 9/20/2007
\
'I
'.
."
...
".
....
f~
\:
, ,.-
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
STATE OF OREGON }
}ss.
County of Lane }
I, Brenda Jones, being first duly sworn, dp hereby depose and say as follows:
1. I state that I am a' Secretary for the Planning' Division of the Development
Services Department, City of Springfield, ,Oregon!'
2. I state that in my capacity as Secretary, I prepar~~ and caused to be
mailed copies of Notice of Adoption to DLeD for ZON2007-00039 (See
attachment "A") on September 20,2007 addressed to (see Attachment
" ,
"
"B"), by causing said letters to be placed ina U_S: mail box with postage
fully prepaid thereon.
, RECEIVED
~ N&tiu. +0
DL-uD -- ---,.
By: Cj~2f;-o7
/ of 21 I\~
STATE OF OREGON, County of Lane ,- (J
9fJz:t ;;'1 , 2007 Personally appeared the above named Brenda Jones,
Secrletary, who acknowledged the foregoing instrument to be their voluntary act Before
me:
LUNd
Brenda Jones 7J
Planning Secretary
_-___________ ._. ~e-
I. OFFICIAL SEAL --- .
I SANDRA MARX ,
I \ ./ NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON ':
I '. COMMISSION NO. 385725 ,~
\ MY COMMISSION EXPIRES NOV,-1~ 2~O~ J
...____________...........__"-~ - - . ..1,
~M~
My Commission Expires: 1///;1-/2 OD g
. . ~. --.
~, iI',) ,,,\,.','!'.['1' r-! ",F:'('!r"-li.: il (noll'i'II
~.! "!'~" ,.! L... ,.."._. ..,.L. i..._': ..,. .I_'n
~. 0:" 2
DtCD
"Notice of Adoption
.../
THIS FORM MUST BE MAILED TO DLCD
WITHIN 5 WORKING DA YS AFTER THE FINAL DECISJOt'C
PER ORS 197.610, OAR CHAPTER 660 - DIVISION 18
I'"~,. :)LCD \,'i:>..' (~1:1y
Jurisdiction: Springfield Local file number: ZON2007-00039
Date of Adoption: 9/18/2007 Date Mailed: 9/20/2007
Was a Notice of Proposed Amendment (Form 1) mailed to DLCD? YesDate: 7/24/2007
o Comprehensive 'plan Text.Amendment 0 Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment
o Land Use Regulation Amendme~t [gj' Zoning Map Amendment
'0 New Land Use Regulation ,0 Other:
Summarize the adopted amendment Do not use technical terms. Do not write "See Attached".
Zoning Map Amendment from' Low Density Residential (LDR) to Mediun; Density. Residential (MDR) for
Assessor's Map 18-02-05'22, Tax Lot 1100, Robert Hastings Property Owner.
Does the Adoption differ frOm proposal? No, no explaination is necessary
Plan Map Changed from:
Zone Map Changed from: LOR
Location: 770 and 780 Sauth 42nd Street
to:
to: MOR
Specify Density: Previous: <10 du/ac
Applicable statewide planning goals:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7, 8 9 10 II 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DD:DDD D 0'0 D
Acres Involved: 0
New: 10-20 dul<ic
Was an Exception Adopted? DYES !Z;] NO'
, ,
Did OLeO receive a Notice of Propose(j Amendment.. '
45-days prior to first evidE?ntiary hearing?
If no, do the statewide planning goals apply?
If no, did Emergency Circumstances require immediate adoption?
[gj Yes
DYes
DYes
DNa
DNa
DNa
OLeo file No. '
Please list all affected State or Fecf8ral Agencies, Local Governments or ~",ecial Districts:
Local Contact: Linda Pauly
Address: 225 Fifth Street, DSD
City: Springfield Zip: 97477-
Phone:. (541) 726-4608 Extension:
Fax NUmber: 541-726-3689
E-mail Address:lpauly@cLspringfield.or.us
ADOPTION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT~
This fonn must be mailed to OLCO within 5 workinl! davs after the final decision
per ORS 197,610, OAR Chapter 660 - Division 18,
L Send this Fom1 and TWO ComDlete CODies (documents and maDs\ of the AdoDted Amendment to:
ATTENTION: PLAN AMENDMENT SPECIALIST
DEPARTMENT OF LAND CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT
635 CAPITOL STREETNE, SUITE 150
SALEM, OREGON 97301-2540
2. Electronic Submittals: At least one hard copy must be sent by mail or in person, but you may also subIT' it
an electronic copy, by either email or FTP. Vou may connect to this address to FTP proposals and
adoptions: webserver.lcd.state.or.us. To obtain our Usemame and password for FTP, call Mara Ulloa II
503-373-0050 extension 238, or by emailingmara.ulloa@state.or.us.
, 3. Please Note: Adopted materials must be sent to OLeO not later than FIVE (5) working days
following the date of the final decision on the amendment.
4. Submittal of this Notice of Adoption n!ust include the text of the ainendment plus adopted findings
and supplementary information.
5. The deadline to appeal will not be extended if you submit this notice of adoption within five working
days of the final decision. Appeals to LUBA may be filed within TWENTY-ONE (21) days of the dat~,
the Notice of Adoption is sent to DLCO.
6. In addition to sending the Notice of Adoption to OLCO, you must notify persons who
participated in the local hearing and requested notice of the final decision.
7. . Need More Copies? Vou can now access these fonus online at http://www.lcd.state.or.usl. Please
print on 8-l/2xll !!l'een naDer onl\'. Vou may also call theOLCO Office at (503) 373-0050; or Fax
your request to: (503) 378-5518; or Email yourrequesttomara.ulloa@state.or.us - ATTENTION: ,
PLAN AMENDMENT SPECIALIST
I.
~"'''''l''''--'''
crNt~~~~I
."c.._.;~,';f,~
Notice of Decision - Springfield Planning Commission
225 FIFTH STREET
SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477
(541) 726-3753
FAX (541) 726-3689
WW~:f. ci. springfield. or. us
Date of Notice:
9/19/2007
Date of Decision:
9/18/2007
Case Number:
ZON 2007-00039
Ao'olicant:
Robert,Hastings
Nature of the Aoolication:
Zoning Map Amendment from Low Density Residential (LDR) to Medium Density, Residential
(MDR) for the following property: .'
Assessor's Map 18-02-05-22. Tax Lot 1100.
The application was initiated and submitted in accordance with the Springfield Development
Code.
On September 18, 2007, a public hearing on the Zoning Map Amendment request was held
,before the Springfield Planning Commission. The Development Services Department staff
report including criteria of approval, findings and recommendations, together with oral and
written testimony submitted has been considered and is part of the record of this proceeding,
Decision:
The Springfield Planning Commission voted 7 in favor, 0 against, 0 absent and 0 abstentions to
approve the Zoning Map Amendment. The action taken by the Springfield Planning
Commission is'a final action. "
Aooeal:
The:applicant or any party may appeal this decision to the City Council. The appeal must be
submitted to the Development Services Department, 225 Fifth Street, Springfield: OR 97477,
within 10 days of the Planning,Commission's decision. TnE"appe~1 must be in accocdance with
the Springfield Development Code Article 15, Appeals. The appeal must be submitted on a City
form and a fee of $250.00 must be paid with the submittal. The fee will be returned to the
appellant only if the City Council approves the Appeal Application. '
Ouestions:
If you have any questions concerning this matt<ir please contact Linda Pauly at 726-4608,
Linda Pauly
Planner,1I1
Urban Planning Diyision
-'
FINAL ORDER
BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, OREGON
ZONING MAP AMENDMENT REQUEST
CASE NO. ZON2007-00039
FINDINGS
CONCLUSION
AND ORDER
NATURE OF THE APPLICATION
Zoning Map Amendment from Low Density Residential (LDR) to Medium Density
Residential (MDR) for Assessor's Map 18-02-05-22, Tax Lot 1100, Robert Hastings
Property Owner.
1. On July 2, 2007 the following application for ,a Zoning Map Amendment was
accepted: Change the zoning of approximately 0.34 acre of land located at 770
and 780 South,42"d Street in Springfield from Low Density Residential to
Medium Density Residential,Planning Case No. ZON2007-00039,
2. The application was submitted and completed in accordance with Section 3.050
of the Springfield Development Code. Timely and sufficient notice of the public
hearing has been provided, pursuant to Section 14.030 of the Springfield
Development Code.
3. On September 18, 2007, a public hearing on the Zoning Map Amendment,
request was held before the Springfield Planning Commission. The
,Deve'lopment Services Department staff report including criteria of approval,
findings and recommendations, together with oral and written testimony
submitted has been considered and is part of the record of this proceeding.
CONCLUSION
On the basis of this record, the requested Zoning Map Amendment application is
consistent with the criteria of Section 12.030 of the Springfield Development Code. This
general finding is supported by ,the specific findings of fact and conclusions in the
attached staff report (Attachment 1) and attached hereto,
FINAL ORDER
It is ORDERED by the Planning Commission of Springfield that Planning Case No.
ZON2007-00039, Zoning Map Amendment Request, be approved.
/'
This ORDER was presented to and approved by the Pla:i0ning c,6 mr.(2, ion' o'n
September 18,2007. .---,-' 'if(./ I
. .. f /)
, Planning Commission Chairperson
/ '
ATTEST
AYES: ?
NOES:l
ABSENT: f:f
ABSTAIN: V
J
Attachment I
Zonillg Map Amendment - Type III'
Staff Report and Findings
SPRINaPIELD
,~~
4
Hearinl' Date:
September 18, 2007
Case Number:
Z()N 2007-00039
Subiect Prooertv:
Assessoh Map No. 18-02-05-
22, portion of Tax Lot 1100
Aoolicant-'Owner
Robert Hastings
2375 Pioneer Pike
Eugene, OR 9740 I
AoolicantJs Reoresentative
None
Date'Submitted:
July 2; 2007
REOUEST: The Applicant requests a Zoning Map Amendment to change the zoning of
approximately 034 acre' of land located at 770 and 780 South 42,d Stie'et in Springfield,
Assessor's Map '18-02-05-22, annexed portion' of Tax Lot 1100 from Low-Density Residential
(LDR) to Medium-Density Residential (MDR). The purpose of the proposed action is to rectify
an inconsistency between, the Metro Plan designation and the zoning" map. Since the existing
zoning is not consistent with the Plan designation, the, Director has determined that this
application qualifies to be processed as a City Sponsored Zoning Map, Amendment, as
established by department policy in 2006. The-Planning Commission is asked to consider the
applicants request and the findings of fact contained within this report to confirm that,the.
proposed zoning is consistent with the Metra Plan and that the application of the MDR zone is
appropriate in this case,
:J..: __:_~_.! J.J .<Il.--=-LTTfrrrfi::tb,:-:: J ~"l~ ~ .l d~ ~!..! t.:.J-11_ _.1 I...J .J:1.i ill i l.tiL"-j"'<.-L.. I L.
R r,LllmlJ~ljIiilllIRc'jl~\illI~'-+; ,JI:,;! mrfJJ,'~. U -'I' .. lI:t:gi1JqS!
,'SIr-: IJ:'. .::L,1).<hJ J:U~lrlLiri~S.I..L'['€~OE1ti.,.;. ':l i--~,72l,-iH
I l -r-- ~r 'II .r~ II tn-- ~,"" /' ;~ . 1.-.-'-"---' (I
::-= ,-f!,ffi~ ern! ~IE_ - i~~'i\.rqcL~~~, ,.Il9-~., iel ">,'/ J I 1
F XLfI l HLlllil' ;1 rl'r'~lof,liijJb'lJ ~---i I _: ~'vpr_:;:
_ _. _ -. l .L...~I 111lil '[II'-----l II( I~
-,ITT-'-- '- - '. '] ,: -- ,.OOc;'~bJnmLli rl - 1 FC"I'v.rero ' - L SUB'ECT PROPERTY
"lJ.L[l-I'p--, Ir'IIII'II-' _ -- - ,:-.-:---.-,;-=JII,'" ~
lc'.U, , j' ,-,!~,. I I_l~[!-! r- . , '__0.' '10- _: -, 770 & 780 South 42,d Street
1[1[-',,"", L1 ~.LJllr;X'- ---1[11.' r. I '
- r-T-IL ~E-J~#.d 0 +:r 8., J r, fl[-, ' '='.. ._ (e~:e,r:_ 34 'cr~ O(,IOt)
. 1 I I I~ IJild Hfb-r 1-- - ~, ~ I I 1- p .';-l-)"EJ .~..~
l:s ~ 'fj.:.p: '["r'1 ~J2P:l11 nRm" r' ~ Vernonl ~ :J I. tr"-'~\l it!) I'L- .- 1 ~'r f;,..!t"r .-jc;.:~
_~I-:- '- I-~ -II r I I >, Elementary ~ ----; -- -l_1 _:.J_ L~. I p, ' . t, c 1- tn I I r k}lT'
F~"l: J ~..!_':-' 'I '@'i+OPmi'I""+1-'-'.l.l.:U"['vu/unleerrl--'lI 1.. - =- -I"-tc,.l' 10t.:' ~i ~ I rg~~'1 '
, ,_ I" __ ,2. P "iJ ~ r I -=4 1",1 " t::1~CE7l7':"
. - ~j cJ I I I . ~I I a~ I ~. :...~-:. ';",: -.sT '/--. 1"'"
_:'c>~0~f lJ;lfrIVr-.::.,ffi r -- '-II--U-~ --":-:;~;;:r-l'~j-::j"J "W
!. '.i" ' r ~nit~H=:J ~ ","-""""5'1 :- - , {~-'IlJ::' \".~, "'~1 -<' . 1 ' J "'!Y <-"
, !J)' ~ ,.JJL. CHS -- it-+-'--" -:. J-I Q.I I L~Jj - I h- '-='~"-njr--I , I' "II~
I]' ~] I LI L L ~ 1[':"J L I -- ILL '''''J,'U:; ,-' - I I -~ fll -"
,)-,-t','-i"UTh,-'-~r-:~n"~'~I'RO --. -- - I :L'jl.iJJ -,ell.! ,"
I" 130"';'110bo- i"; ,'-.,~jp -r-: -- ell .111 r, ~i},',rTIIJI r:.. L l'll -, . j'~IPE'L - --.~
r:..j ~ -.-L 1'1 /H~B! . st;;z;u:"f rr'IH' ~'l U II Ii [11-( i-J ' '-ri ,c] 11. I! , I
'''1,,1 :'\ ----f" I JI....,.. I .......-~~- II ,~ J..-\" ~J I 1
',~ -?'-;( --_ .--;;t---r....- ,,' ,.,.~,......-\" - -- .
'--~ -,'"," ffi~sts"-"B'I I I...j, "~~<o,'1 ,I ,
, 'T' -. r- . ~ . ,-l-1-~ f ~ ,O\~ ,. I'-~- -I I I
~ '_ ---c...- L~ II) _;:-_~I_~_\_(f1 ',/ ill ~ .\ .~.."... J-~-=-:l I I;
VICINITY MAP Not ,to scale 8
Attachment
1 - 1
12Q~~I,1 1,'II,T1---'1---[----I->~' ,
__ ___ __ ~-'-!-l\s~lrBg-:-~, 1 I
1 1 rl-------~ -------------------- - ---, ~
I ~.,~~;"~:oom ~ --~-'~Thjj I'
~Ei' , /?-11-1--(1~ r
0--- J1~1 I I
A' ,ID\1+-, '
]!i \,.} .\ . \ j I
u) 1- -- Mt Vernonl , : '------- -
, t f-- f" - :: - I i ,-- \In=-'4=R \/ OJ;Umj-
Elementarv..~i",I, i ~~:::~ III
"",,:,',\fi';ii,.iF :'~ ~outh 42nd Street
'YJ}Z'j:,,,j;;)F": I '/' r--J 1 .
(,(;,(?l!&l% I'-~
X:;:ij::,,<';i'P;~" I ~
'.'!:;-""":'~':-. W.
I
Z
..JJ
, I
~
..
NEIGHBORHOOD VICINITY
Not to scale
LEGEND
,Cir( Limits Line
I' 'I I I I I
FOR'SYTHIA~
l-r-rrT
SUBJECT PROPERTY
770 & 780 South 42" Street
(eastern .34 acre of lot is inside the
, City Limits)
ffi
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION, The subject property is located on the west side of South 42"
Street, south of Booth Kelly Road and the 'railroad line. The land subject to this application is
approximately 0.34 acre of a 0.91 acre lot, The subject property is the eastern (annexed)
portion of a lot which is currently divided by a north-south City Limits line. The e~stern
portion of the lot is inside the City limits and is zoned LDR. The western portion of the lot 'is
not annexed and is zoned MDRI UF-I O. The land is currently developed with a single family
residential use. Access to the property is from South 42" Street.
REVIEW'PROCESS: This City Sponsored Zoning Map Amendment application is a Quasi_
judicial Zoning Map Amendment which affects a single property, involves the application of
existing policy to a specific factual setting, and does not.require a Metro Plan diagram
amendment. SDC 12.030 (I) states that Quasi-judicial Zoning Map Amendments may be
approved by the Planning Commission and that the Planning Commission's decision is the final
local decision. This application is reviewed under Type III procedures listed in SDC 3.090 and
12. The application was accepted as complete on July 2,2007.
Approval of the request would allow development in accordance with the standards of SDC
Article 16 at residential densities of 10-20 dwelling units per acre. The applicant's proposal is
limited to the annexed eastern portion of the lot. The wester'ly portion of the lot is within
Springfield's UF-I 0 Urbanizable Fringe Overlay District, thus annexation is required prior to
Attachment
1 - 2
. ,
development of the property with Medium Density residential uses. The owner is interested in
seeking development approval for the subject property, thus the zoning,h,ust be made
consistent with the Plan designation. A minimum density of 3 units would be required and'a
maximum of 6 units would be permitted on the 034 acre subject proper!ty. Future
development of the site would require a Type II land use review process' (Site Plan Review
and/or approval of a land division), including notice to surrounding property owners.
Development would not necessarily be subject to Site Plan Review. SDc; 3 i .020 (2lia) exempts
duplex dwellings from Site Plan Review when the lot in the MPR zone aHo'\Ys only one such
dwelling, " '
DISCUSSION: In this report, staff 'will demonstrate that thepr,oposed MDR zoning is
appropriate and consistent with the Metro Plan. and that the proposal meets the' criteria for.
approval of quasi-judicial zoning map amendmen'ts in accordance at. Springfield Develop~ent.
Code 12,030 (3). .
RECOMMENDATION:,
Upon review of the applicant'srequest, staff finds that the proposed t:1~dium Den.sity Residential
zoning is appropriate for the sLibject ,property and recommends approval of the' applicant's
request,
"
'II
ZONING OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES:, Land to the n'orth is inside the City Limits
and zoned MDR (Glacier View Subdivision) andLDR (Tax Lot 1002). Land to the south. is
zoned MDR Go. No. 99-03-088). Land east of 42" Street is zoned Pul:llic Land and Open Space
(PLO)., " . ' .
'.
SITE PHOTO:
Attachment
1 - 3
ADIACENT PROPERTIES:
o. ._
Lot abutting the subject property to the nonh
~-,
" .
~"':i:::~i::~:.~~:<;;:~:~:_i-;~
-
.- .'" .
_ ,....-. .G.~,::::'~,'.::._ '.~'":'":..:-..-- - ----.
Old Mount Ve;non School Property across the street
Propenr, to south of subject propeny
Attachment
1 - 4
--. ,......., -
EB
LDR Low Density Residential
-
MDR Medium Density Residential
:~~:~}: :"< :'.'.:" ..~~.~
CC Community Commerdal
NC Neighborhood Commercial
PLO Public Land and Open Space
Attachment.
- 1,- 5
I
~"-
.
rJ,
-J~: J~
I..t..
.'--~.. . ~
~ -
I --I . ..... . ----i'I~
"":....[200\:"-- ,.o';~~-;7;O <:'~,:;"~
, ~.~ p. ~. .',. }~:~,.:I " ~
,,' ~--'-'-,;:'~f.ac.::\-~~L. :111: :!f-~~':1': 'J;,~~~J'\
I f. .',~'''/~''.)'..:. .',', ., 1.":::7""'~l'5:JOO:' ; ~ ~,
;":;~~~,';" ''''.'-: :J~~~';ll ~;0:,:2'f";;Wn-r-.'
;UBJECT PR~;;~~J : :I':~,:'" :i?;~\\::~~5~J'[,'\c:;:'~~~'id
. f ~~~.J ':'"' ~.' GLAL:rt.:-iV1EVi DR. .7:~: ~:',':'" : ,~jrr I'
I . ,: ..:",r \>,..,-_(;-'~I';' 1=::':1 i BS"i r-,n. .
I ~-,",.c..:lOO ..... :..".".).".~'Ilo,,\,,\,:~Al'lrJ~ C"') ~:,
I .~ 'l.~'.""" :y' 4.~r...'l .;. 41QO .l<.' ....'. . "'.11:' A;j! 1.' ":~ I i
. I I'" ,y !."r'W"';'-;.il.\t' " (~j i .61
City Urn'''. J -1~~' . "'''I:,:,_L_~ t'
::.L--".~-,,-,--=- 1-., -, ,-' " ]i.:
, . "'~r,~oo' '1" '"01 ." ;- -~-=-=-k'l
,-". - '1'':' a." "':. ." .,.),) ...;: . --:, , . .I'.!
I.;, ~~Fi:~ . '~I~ ; ,~ : .
, '11--''' -c, '''-'--'-'~l'' ('1~~.~:' . T ".' ,. ~. ~!':.:,-
. ,1 ;.~,I!
.. ,~i' .1
18-02-05-22 Tax lot 1100
~C'lrr' ---- -
, ~...: .~ HP~f! PAcIFIC 0,
--". . ~1~':::.oAO
),
-:. :~--J,-=-_
----.
------
:-:--I"~'~
.... ,...' """r~:;;:---
",'
",/;;',,;:"i::.:.'.
'. oJ,"':':,':"
11 l-~~;
I
Lane.Countv Assessor's MaD
Not to scale .
Attachment
1 - 6
EB
SUBJECT PROPERTY
no & 780 South 42,d Street
(easter;n ..34 acre of lot)
SITE AERIAL PHOTO
Not to sc"le
E9
Attachment
1 - 7
Ml::TRO PLAN DESiGNATION OF SUBIECT PROPERTY,
MEDIUM DENSITY RES"DENTIAL
co~","\fjf!fi
4;~ '.;r;ir~&';'\X)-I'
" . .,~~.~ ~.~N~:r'1 : ~~~r
r .~ "- ,". "" -.~.. .x'.X" : X r~"~ "N~ ::~,.~~.,
, , ~ ~:';N'"" l- &oi:!~, ~~:;.:~~ ::J
~. , ',~".'
SUBJ~CT ~ROPERTY - ~
,~~ 'J)
'- --., '_____-r-~ I
X~.: ,.!l5;
':.a;, L0
\;~~~~~:{~~:h ._
:~.::. '-'
~fJ
I
,
,
CD
N
Enlargement of Plan Diagram with 420d Street and Railroad shown as identifiable features
E9
Eugene-Springfield
Metrop,olitan Area
General Plan,
Plan Diagram
(Th~ i:Jr~rpr~::llioll :U11!. p\.\rpo"c qf rue Pl.a.l D1Jgrm:. Jud de}criptiC:l~
orrbe bud \\':c':. aud ':.:.u)bol',.':.llC~'.l.l. m CO:l!J~ed ill Clupler n~G,)
., , 0 0 []
;. '. Urb.ll1 G,n',-,Th :,;.."".,.1')"1 Lc-"",G~",il','r;H.i<I"l"ITi-,1 u'Jnl r,\;:t!iun' Inn"l>lri~1
.. , 0 ~ 0
' ' " , M,,:l<) rl.:.n eUUHU,I'!
M~~i'-'''l D~,,~il'i fl,e~i~~c.tiJI Cd'-"P';' Ir.r1;J~1ri,,,1
,~" .' 0
/ v' r..:lllc~d,; 0 [J
Hif,I1I~"'n~il'i.!;eGili::llli~1 Univer<;hy 1-\~1.~Mt;h
/'V F-1.<:!.andPaod. 0 0 ~
c')I'1r,,~'cidl G'l".re",",~r,~.ancl t:cl"C<lliun
(J',,,::!\~~,,:
K1 Mi,oe'~ u~~ AF"'<l~ ~ r'\.l\<:>r I-l",.,jl <:oen(~r~ CD l-'Jr<~ <lnr1'Op~1l 5p<l';~ :.:-:'
./~
~ 1'.IIl.L,1 Ll~.....l.,~,m"nl A:"d 0 H"'~1" I"'li,.,,:ri.,l 0 N..I.""I i-\..,,~)urr.~ E2
0 ';,,'iI1.ln,..,r:.. r...~~n''''.... ~ 5p",.~i.;1 H~.i'''"1I,''1,.[.fri.J 0 S.,nrl dnc1 rjr~,,'..l
~ricdlur~
klr"'~T lo!l"d
Ruro1l f>""dclenlial
R'jl'M Gllmnl..rciili
RUi"Jllr.OI.lr,lri.;!
.\irpoft Re.serve
PLAN DESIG"lATION LEGEND.
Attachment
1 - 8
:'
"
SDC 12.030 Criteria of Approval - Zoning Dist~jct Change
SDC 12.030 establishes the criteria to be used in approving zone cha~ges. In consideration of
this request, the Planning Commhsion or' Hearings Official shalf adopt findings, which
demonstrate'that all of the applicable ~riteria have been addressed:!1 . .
SDC 12.030 (3)(a)
Consistency wj~h applicab/e,Metro Plan policies-"nd the Metro Plqn Diagram.
The Metro Plan provides the public with general guidelines for individual planning decisions.
Reference to supplemental planning documents of a more localized scope, including
neighborhood refinement plans, is advisable when applying the Plan to ~pecific parcels of land or
individual tax,lots (Metro Plan page 1-2, #4). The Plan serves as a general planning framework to
be augmented, as needed, by more detailed planning programs to meet the specific needs of the
various local governments (Metro Plan page 1-2, #8).
Finding: No refinement plan has been adopted for the South Springfield area. There are no
supplemental planning documents of a more localized. scope which include the subject property.
Finding: In this case, the Plan Diagram provides sufficient specificity to apply the Plan to the
subject property because two identifiable features are shown: 420d Str.eet and the r;;iiroad line.
The Metro ~lan Diagram dearly indicate~ Medium Density Residential plan designation in the area
of land south of the railroad line and west of South 42,d Street, Although the Pla.n diagram has
,no identifiable feature to establish the southerly limit of this MDR plan designation area,
previous decision making by the City has established that the proposed MDR plan designation
and zoning are appropriate and correct for these lots. In 19~9, the City approved a zoning map
amendment which applied Medium Density Residential zoning to land which abuts the subject
property along its southern boundary,' '
Finding: The Metro Pion Ddgnati~n of the subject property is M~dium Densirf residential.
The proposed Medium Density residential zoning is consistent with 'the Medium Density Plan
designation, The existing Low Density Residential zoning represents ~ Plan/ione:connict which
must be corrected prior to development of the site. , ,;'
"l
The following Metro Plan policies support (he applicant's request:,
Merro Plan page Land Supply and Demand Policy A.2: Residentially designated land within
the UGB should'be zoned consistent with the Metro Plan andiapplicable plans and
policies. ",
Metro Plan Land Supply and Demand Policy, Policy A.4: 'Use annexation, provision .of
adequate public faciliti~s and services, rezoning, redevelopment, and infill to meet
the 20-year projected housing demand.
Metro PlanR~sidential Density Policy A,I 0: Promote higher residential .densi,ty inside the
urban growth boundary that utilizes existing infrastructure, improves the efficiency
of public services arid facilities, and cOnserves rural resource lands outsi,de the urban
growth boundary.
, Attachment
1 - 9
Metro Plan Residential Density Policy A 1'1: Generally locate higher density residential
development near empfoyment or commercial services, in proximity to major
'transportation systems or within transportation-efficient nodes.
Metro Plan Residential Density Policy A: 12: Coordinate, higher density residential developfTlent '
with the provision of adequate infrastructure and services, open space, and other urban
amenities.
Metro Plan Residential Density PolicyA 13: Increase overall residential,density in the
metropolitan area by creating more opportunities for effec~ively designed in-fill,
redevelopment, and mixed use while considering impacts of increased residential
density on ,historic, 'existing and future neighborhoods.
Finding: Approval of the applicant's request would allow an increased residential density on
the subjea property from a maximum of 3 units (at LDR maximum density of 10 du/acre) to a
maximum of 6 units (at MDR 'maximum density of 20 du/acre).'
,Finding: Approval of the applicant's request would create an opportUnity for effectively
designed in-fill development in accordanc~ ""ith Metro Plan policies. If the owner requests and
receives approval to annex the, westerly portion of the lot, the entire 0.91 acre site could be
developed with I 0 to 18 units.
Metro Plan Residential Density Policy A 14: Review local zoning and development
regulations periodically to remove barriers to higher density housing and to make
provisions fora full range of housing,options. '
Finding: The presen'ceof inconsistent LDR zoning within are~s designated MDR on the Metro
Plan limits restricts redevelopment opportunities through limitation of density and,creates
'additional restraints on design. The existing LDR zoning creates a restraint on infill
development on adjacent MDR zoned land because the Code r~quires building height to be
, reduced toLDR maximum heights (30 feet) where MDR orHDR la~d within 50 feet of the
abutting LDR district boundary. '
Finding: Approval of the p~oposal will create an opp<?rtunity to increase the number of units
permitted and thus increase overall density and additional housing options within the
metropolitan area,
,
Metro Plan page IIl-A-8 Residential Density Policy A 16: Allow for the development of
zoning district~ which allow overlap of the established Metro Plan density ran'ges to
promote housing choice and result in either maintaining or increasing housing,
density in those districts. Under,no cir,cumstances, shall housing densities be
allowed below existing Metro Pial) density ranges.
Finding: The existing Sp~ingfield Zoning'for the subiect property presently permits adensity
allocation lower than the MDR Plan designation,
Finding:' The existing LDR zoning is inconsistent wit[1 the Metro Plan text.
Conclusion: Staff finds that theMDR zoning requested by the applicant is consistent with the
applicable Metro Plan policies and the Plan Diagram provides the level of specificity necessary to
Attachment
1 - 10
apply the MDR district to the subject' property.
SDC 12.030 (3)(a), '
The proposal meets the approval criterion at
I~
SDC 12.030 (3)(b) ,
Consistency with applicable Refinement Plans, Plan 6istrictmaps;:Co'nceptua/
Deve/~ment Plans and functional plans. .
Finding: There is no Refinement Plan, Plan District map, or Conceptual Development Plan for
the subject property. Metro Plan designations estaplish the basis for functional plans ..
(transportation, public facilities: etc.) in the metro'acea. thus zoning in accordance with the Plan
designation shall be consistent with .the applicable functional plans.
SDC 12.030 (3)(c)
The property is presently provided with adequate public facilities, services and
transportation networks to support the use, or these facilities, seniices and.
transportation networks are plan';ed. to be pravided concurrently )Vith the development
of the property.' '
Finding: The subject property has 100 feet.of frontag~ on South 42,d Street, a Major Arterial
lublicstreet.
,.L . ..! n c'_,i: ~ ;.' ~;! MAIN .Sl} 1"1
:~:f('t",,:';j)~i'\"'';;.J''l,';'.'~'''--;'k'L;;::!i)i''l';;:\~;~'''$d:Pr/:i",';;~~i:.ji;;:';~'(''''':~L:i,.9~~",,-;':':'lt;~'iPr!~;'~~9-f.,,-'4,~~(~!iM;',I)~\i!~'r;i~~~,;~~!Iil,
~. (fl., L, "I'" .~t'''''''''"'~''L, 1/ l.l
N "mJ, l 1
l. ,. ~'" .' r,r-~-,';"=:""-=~.
It N'C.. L._....; , '1'-
~..<.,....~,=:,~~~:::.: ..~,., Z" ::.;;':;:'.,,: ~.::;;: '-,; ~-;_7"'~}.;;~.~'\~,;::!.. ~.J.:~,
:-tg ~ I " ""<~ o. . .;' ,,' .~ ";"~'j
. t., .. .. -. ~ .. , (fl . ;1';'''' . ..,..
~ ~ '--1
! '" ~'7 - ~
&; U;
r f:
~ "
f.
I . r
~~~'7:~~~.::;;~~z:;:r8l'~.22:,~~~~
/
SUBJECT PROPERTY.
...
.....,.~:,;::,,..'~~ff;i:"(.....;:.;..;..:,..,,._-',".'"
,\.
r
.Legend
MajorArlerial
Minor'Arlenal
Collector
Local
-/" ./
.~~::::.:.:-.<
I'0PO Bou[idary
/"-../. Urban Gro',,1h Bouc,daries
I
ffi
Roadwav Classification Mao
Attachment
1 - 11
Finding: South 42,d Street 'has recently been fully improved. Existing transportation systems
provide access to the propertY. Specific access requirements will be addressed when the -
property is developed.
,Finding: The City's Conceptual Street Map shows a westward extension of Mt. Vern~n Road.
The projected future right of way is located south of the subject property.
Finding: A public 12-inch storm water line and a 6-inch public sanitary se"';'er.are located in .
South 42" Street along the frontage of the subject property.
Finding: The property is served by Springfield Fire and Life Safety. Specific a~cess to the site
for fire and life safety vehicles will be determined when the property is developed,
Finding: .Tlle site is within Springfield School District 19.
Finding: The site is within the Willamalane Parks and Recreation District.
Finding: Expected traffic impacts ,of the proposed rezoning to MDR are as follows"
ITE trip generation rates for detached single-family are: '
Daily Trips = 9.57 per D.U. .
PM Peak Hou~ = 1.0 I per D.U.
Data for "Rental Townhouse" is limited but what exists indicates a rate about 70% that of
detached single-family: Condon own house (ownership units) is a bit lower still.around 5S% -
60% of detached single family.
So, three D.U of detached single:family would generate 29 trips per day and_ 3 trips per PM Peak
Hour; six D.U of Rental Townhouses would produce 20 trips per day and 2 trips per PM Peak
Hoo~ . '
At this small scale the difference in traffic volume would not have .a significant impact to a
neighborhood.
Finding: Lane Transit District (L:rD) reviewed the application and found that the proposed
zone change will not affect existing transit service.,
. Finding: Solid waste management service is available at the subiect property, The City and
Sanipac have an excl~sive franchise arrangement for garbage service inside the city limits.
Finding: The site receives police protection from the City of Springfield, consistent with
service provision' throughout the city and with service that is now provided to adjacent
properties.
Finding: Qwest and Comcast'currently provide telephone and cable communication service in
this area for a~d an array of wireless companies provide a number of different communication
services. The City has no exclusive franchise arrangements with telecommunication or wireless
companies. The field is competitive. and therefore guarantees a wide selection currently and
upon annexation.
Attachment
1 - 12
Conclusion: The property is pres!Ontly provided with adequate publi~ facilides. services and
transportation networks to support the use., Any specific public anl1J private improvement
requirements and utility connection points will be determined when the property is developed.
The proposal meets tho; c~iterion at SDC 12.030 (3)(c) , '
SDC 12.030 (3)(d) ,
Legislative Zoning Map amendments that invol,ve a Metro Plan Di~gram amendment
shan: ' " '
I. Meet the approval criteria specified in Article 7 of this Code; and .
2_ Comply with Oregon Administrative Rule (OAR) 660-01.2-0060, where applicab'Ie.
Finding: This City Sponsored Zoning Map Amendment application is a Quasi-ju.dicial Zoning
Map Amendment which affects a single property, involves the applicatibn of existing policy to a
specific factual setting, and does not require a Metro Plan diagram amendment.
Conclusion: SDC 12.030 (4)(d)'is not applicable.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 'SDC12.040 states: The Approval Authority may
attach conditions as may be reasonably necessary .to allow the Zoning Map
Amendment t'o be granted. ' '
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
. Staff finds that the proposed Zoning Map Amendment is consistent' with the criteria of SDC
12.030. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the requested Zoning Map
Amendment as shown in Attachment 2- B without conditions: '
Attachment
1 .13
Attachment 2-A
EXISTING SPLIT ZONING: LOW AND MEDIUM DENSITY
. . RESIDENTIAL
0,34 acre Hastings Property at 770 and 780 South 42,d Street, Springfield OR
Assessor's Map 18-02-05-22 eastern portion of TL 1100 .
ZON2007-00039
-'" I I I I
J=d
~~~-~ -
SUBJECT
PROPERTY
770 & 780 South 42"
Street
(eastern ,34 acre of lot)
i II
) ---j . ~
III..............
. ,~.,:
: "",.;,::., i":f~ .:-.
, -~ ",,- :,:'- .'
IT........
I
I
II
~li
E"I I 1- '.---'1 ~
~8]8j;1~.T'TI
'lot to scale
ZONING L':Ge'ND
I
I
I
I
~.
{)"===."'''''",,'-'....,-.
I \111111111111 )..
LOR Low Density Residential
MDR Medium Density Residential
CC Community Commercial
\ NC Neighborhood Commercial
PlO Public land and Open Space
Attachment
2 - 1
I~l=
3Mf-
1111.1 r\
'\
.L
:..:. -
-1
-j
1
-cf
l
=1
3
---J
- I
~\~
=rfr
--,
I 'r-
N
CJ
Attachment 2-8
PROPOSED ZONING: MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
0.34 acre Hastings Property at 770 and 780 South 42,d Street, :Springfield OR
. '
Assessor's Map 18-02-05-22 eastern portion of TL 1100
. . ZON2007-00039
f-Jt-L of-I
I. fh= I'
j
-~
_'I
~l "
1
] ,
:f .
:'
...J
l .
4,t, "'---. " " ,
,,,,,,,,:"'~'-""=-,,,,,",,,,=-,,,,.!~,=..;.,",,,,,,..,.,-~=.
I. \1111111111 I' Ii'
~ III'~/ , " ,yr ~,~~
~IJ ,,~.-- = --1 / ~\'i
~-~-~,.l~ - I _ L
~:JP.] II LI rffF'~~U' --, " '
~. ' --::---'::~ ..11
" . ---,.. --.. '---..Jl:
, SUBJECT PROPERTY . ~.' ~ _ 1::R1D,', I'~'" '
770 & 780 South 42" Street ~ ~ _ ~ It II I
(eastern .34 ~cre of lot) ___________;
, .
1',,' I J11 I I
. '--'"1-
.' .",',.'
.
I.~......=,,,,~-
i-Tf
j\ );
- 11 IlL-'
;;-~.J i . i r:': ~"'I"'~""~
E, \ Il- I
w8IHJ;Y'T''i"1 I I I
Not to sca'!e -
ZONING LEGEND
lDR Low Density Residential
MDR Medium DensityResidential
{:} 1:~t:":~:-~.~.~,:~ ~;;~1~~
CC Community Commercial
I' NC Neighborhood Commercial
PLO 'Public Land and Open Space
Attachment
2-2,
'~. \_'
,. - -.
. -
.3ir<<f1 ~
UJlll[\l
-,' . .... '-I
I"
lillO'
~
~ ~
\ :1
~
Ir'
I~'(
'N
'CD
..Jur\ Co.;:) U,
U..J. '-......'f" ..." _.--
WC.~It;-{N t'JUNU.K IllLt
;':i .
~ax:,al~4aa-)321
Jun 0" :JOO)
16: 39
P. 06
\'
i.t.;:~;,
, .,
: .;...
, ..~.
~.. .
<'-"e
~ ~;. .
)' 1,'
i:"'z"
i:( .
. ';e/,il,,} , ".
... .',.," .
T~~t"
EXHIBIT A.
lEGAL DESCRJPJJQN
,: ,":., ,A pari:al of land lying ., !he ~ one-<r.larl!lr oIlhe No, j...~, one-q=tcr
:(NW l( NW 1') of 8ealon 5, Township 18 South. Rang.'2 WfJ:Sl.of the
,W"",rOOtla MerIdian. Lana 'Ca<:rty, OnlgOll.:Qnd being a portion of lhallr.;d of
; '.land c:tl<1"OyOO Ie ROBERT JAMES HASTlNGs and JACQUELINE CAROl
__.'c"',.," ,'.8ASTlNG8, as lBno1nllil by u-", ernlrm:t,by I!ud cart::rin deed ,~.~...; July 20,
,... . \',1992, on RB<3f 1778, Recorda'" Recepllcn Number 9239ll3ll, LANE COUNTY,
'.:.':"'! .. .LOREGDN DEED RECoRDs, IndLded in . :itnp of land 3S feet In wi<ltl'l1y0g on
--"~.,,,.;..L:,;'.',,\,;::,::.:.,~.:.'. ..,,' ..~lhe'~ old. of Itlc oenlB<1ine of So,ull1'42'" S1rn<r!, as """"'~ by Lane
1':(:.,,,' i~1n2oaa;lhe_..~..~."bclng~it~as~llows:. .
": ';;.:' c";' ':.,'., .'BBglnning at Engin<:er3'C_.~_L SUlio<1 L.11}t{){J.OO POT, ~ <t:i!ion being
" !,,','i',:-.:'::'. '''. 'z:'12 Sllll.1e foot Norlh ll1\d. S6.gs feet E";,,t of.lhe Br= Cap' manclng the
:: <> _Ji:~~l~)1:~~i,:-i,;>}):'.{;:<~ Comer. of ttm ~ ~ ~nZtiont.arid Clarm Number 63 in SecOOn
.:. .."....:,:: ,'~'.'Ql",~o::> ':~.,",..."...,J5:.Townshlp III South, Fl.llrQ9 2 West of lt1e Wlllam<l!le Mendlan, Lane County,
. ,-:,-~':"I;rit~ri..;1~;!1~'~1~~~ ~=I~=.~'~'~"~~.'=:' 3~ ~~:.
. ..~,~. . ',::.:' ;';:Tha '>.~r, Ilne of tile _ desa!be<1s1rip of lard ~ GRANTOR'S southerty and
. _. .' .:; :"_'"'0"; prope<1;y rIlleS oppo>;l12 ~ Eng!ncar:r Cetmuiina Stationt; L 21+83 POT
~Ai::,;';i(/fC~':~~POT,._.,.~."'Y.: ". . .. .'
.:": :./':::' :~'.,n.;~ 01 \;!nd lD wnh:h 1M ~~;"':;"n opPies =Ins 1,5Oll S<j",,", foot, mo"! or!=;.
......~::: :.,~,..~ ~;' ,:~.- ':':.:0.... ';, f.: ..' . . . .' : .
- . ......,...... .:. . -. .'
;:Tne bMnr.go used t>eroIn are blOOd on a bB3nng afSoUlllIl" 44"12" East between LC.C.M.
'l22Banif LC.C.M; 1 a.c2-SO ELL, sa>; beaMg ~ on tho Creson C<:x>tti1""oo Syt;!em,
. ,(NAD !l3I9i~ SalAh Zone. . .
'..,."'..
I '.
:.L
.';'. .
i
, :y~i
.-.:r.'
:.~ -.~
. - ...: .:.-..:.: : .;_..~..". '.. ',-. -.
.. .:",:'.'1,.... .
:~
..:i:'.
.1'
,.;j:~
~rpiJ UG.U.=>alD'TIDI<,
LIJ77~ ~~S~ - rdjes .03l1&l?JS
. 1~~:Z:: 1100
..
)I ~
--.;
ATTACHMENT
3-1