HomeMy WebLinkAboutComments PLANNER 3/24/2009
;J
!'
L1MBIRD Andrew
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
MOTT Gregory
Tuesday, March 24, 20099:48 AM
L1MBIRD Andrew ,
FW: Springfield PAPA 001-09: Amending Gateway Refinement Plan
_ i'
II
I
A~~ I
, . ,
Go ahead and place the email train from Ed into the record. Wherever your staff report mJntions correspondence or
"
comments from the public and interested parties be sure and identify that DLCD reviewed this proposal and had no
comments. ]1
I'
gmott ]1
From: Ed Moore [mailto:ed.w.moore@state.or.us]
Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 9:40 AM
To: MOTT Gregory; MOORE Ed W (OR)
Cc: UMBIRD Andrew
Subject: RE: Springfield PAPA 001-09: Amending Gateway Refinement Plan
"
I
Greg, ,;
your correct, Gloria's comments are directed at Exhibit B. Given your clarification, ~e have no comments on
I
the proposed PAPA. "
Cheers,
Ed
Ed Moore AICP
So Willamette Valley
Regional Representative
DLCD Springfield Office
644 A Street
Springfield, OR 97478
971.239.9453
ed.w.mooretalstate.or.us wWw.oreenn.eovfLeD
i;
I
>>> On 2009.03.23 at 15:47, in message i:
<CIEID2BFDOE40040BA6444 74C38411 A6D5AOB78801@spifs030.Springfieldl.tiet>, MOTT Gregory
<gmott@ci.springfield.or.us> wrote: . I:
lTlfaIlks [orthe/lPPCl!tunity!Q'feview dipria's comment~,'I'ci:i.:1iSs~g heT c01I1II;1~ntsare Qirected at E.~bit1
Il3ig,9!!1:nit~c~~ofI[~9P..oSe<l~5~J1weht.'Thlitexh!blt!s,,~.2~d,inance:ad,optedby~olllcil in 2005 as part of,
fa remand.orden:Q,~xJ-:.lJBA.o~nl.:tproR()~a!Jo ~n4:the Gateway.Refi!1.e!!l.~.r!.tElanJ.to liIJ()\V.theQev~eI()P.!!l.e1ltJ
II /. .I
1 DatE! Received: 3 .7'(/;2&tJ?
Planner: IAL I
Ii
",-" ~-- ',..'" __":,;~"~>-*****'C"~'-_~*_**:*_' _..___*_,iflii~::,_---:,~"~.__,.l~".,__*",.:..~,_ _~, " ~ . _., .~_.,
:6fth~RivefBend:clll11P!l~:W~'r~ notpIClp'osing.to ch,allge'anyofthat,~)f(nnance; "';r provided it as context to
:the one policy in that documentthat requires trus siie,to lie redesignated; for nodaldeyelopment.Wearen'ot i
;proposingtochangethe,distribfiiion .0ftheunderlYlpgzonjngnor,are weprtlp6singt6'"Cliange the permitted .
:usesexcept to proliibits91l1e c()pPiercial activities that are, currently permitted butliWill be pr?hibited upon
redesignationas nodal overlay: "Th'ililks again. ", " 'J. .'.' ." .
Greg Mott. ., .~'
,"','l-
.,
'"
, ~ c+';'''!.'*; @
I o. ~ -*. ' '-' " _ ;'0, .,"" \ )t
, "" "', --.m ' ~ -~ +""1"" - ^ 'j'
From: Ed; Moore [mailto:ed.w.moore@stat~.or.m;] ,
'Sent:Monday; Marcp23, 2009 10:3 lAM . ,''.
,To: MOTT Gre 0'." . ,,. ., ' ,
;Subject: Fwd:S~r~lifieflpAPA'00i;Q9: Amending 'q'!teway Refrn~ii1yhiRla:;"
['- \i,.~;1) "~~-.;!: " " - " - . -::", :,:' ';' ~"-) - "'
Greg, . "..
I " '. . " '" . .
"1, ",'M~;'A~",,--"',"_- - ,0"';'0""':;" t'J:..,:> -',,^,j:1':~\""-4c... .",\", " ~~"l" ",..,'h'-:J"'"~* ,'. , ,
'As wediscussea;;let me laiow ifyou'would.likefueto submifthese suggestions'as;jJait. of the official record.'
don't see any of them as deal' stoppers; but per our IJO. surprises agr~errienf iu}d ii~.t!'n 'the. late. date that I '
. ',1*' _"~'A_._,.___..''',}, _ .-'n",""': , . ~*.--'~'''''''0p>%lJ. 'HI-f' .
received, the!llTdOli':'t f{el:W.~ife~ato'subIl).inh~m'i~cth~y~o,uldq~lay;youI adoptign;. , ' .
i. "" r ",-,' 'r ", :p:dt;; , j-'""'f ''''',v'"
;Ed;:, . '> <~~l~;;~~'~t~/~~~~::~ 't ".c; ::::, . i~,~,7:~:~.
'Ed Mo~r~ AIel' er':'~'F",,'F'" F." -"tr::"':"
:So Willam~tte Valley ., ' ,r .'
:Regional Representative' " +,.':
DLCD Springfield Office '~: F
'644 A Street'". ,< ':f" C',' e r
. "'1 .
- . . . ),' 1
:Spri.ngfield, O~'p7478i""h I
971.239.9453" , .. , eM"
ed.w.moore@~tate.ori"us<rriailtb~ed.w:rh'o~r~@s~te:~r.u~:I":;":''. f" ,
~"reg"" g"""~Q<h':II~""re~,""/L~;: < .,; , :'" < <l"'~'f'" . . .
~i" ::;;;;;;;~';~~::'.:::::;~;;;~::;;_":t;l:ri~ C~;~.':' .1
;My cOmmeIlts:are:ontheamendIDe,nts B., [ lis a' ,suggesteddeletion;a:Suggested additiori'is in :
i5?ld;,~\;:j':"~3~;::':5':;;'" ;;',.'~' ",:.,:,;' ~';:~'~/~::l~:i~:'.:: ," '"':~
Residential Element'P'olicyand Implementatiol1 Actions'::",' e:> . C " .. ,,:1
;Action 2: r recomlhendi"revising' as follows to ensUre'consistency w{ti{ Goal ,I O:.Housmg, O:AR660, division'
:8; and theneeded)ipl1sillg statutes in Of,Sfhapter (97:, .,-'.' ..'.y;j , ',~'::T;;;'?:"., e l
r~- ~~ ,\"'::'" ,~,.,"~ ";,t~'-6<:>,;~.::_~,,;,s~'~'~::;~." ,.'l1:~"~,'::,~'~;~LY--'-"" "-;~~,<_:~g!~"",,, ~""l ," \t~J;"'::,:':'~)~~l<' / ',,;~'.,= " . 'j
f"Ensure availabiliti Clf [adeqiiate] need.ed supplies ofland fQf low-;'medjum-,',atidliigh;.density fl;sidential,. ,f
ideY~16pme~t ~~I~~IOWin;,.foi~~::;~:'~.;~te mix ~~~9~:rciat e~~)9yment~id(eSidentia: us~s." .
tAdeqiia~e!: is!oo yague'a!id undefine~. This policy ,sh9uldQe clearly consistent ,~ith Spnngfield's , .
'obligation to ensure ),supply ofhll1d in the .UGB to meet the housingn.eeds of all of its residents according :.
(ii~ h~OUSing}~~~t?~,~;~alYS:~*:fr', e " ,e: ::::L, ".,. )~~\F '., . '. I
IAction 1.~&:. 'I recommend ievI~jpg"tK~)<i!>!septe.n~easfollows for SQp~j~~11'Sy.,~h_t1j~_gQal) O:!:Iousil1g,_:i
2 . II
Date Received:
Planner: AL
r
~ ^~ t"-
'I
,~1
,
,]
,
",t,'
";.." ,,'.-
i
0'1.z.>o ,
P1R61;b;~diii,'l!O~]~ail~i:ili11~~edel~o~ing s~tu1esTri 6RS~ chapter:T91/'c~~~ "~ -~";
,~:.' .:;~,;:;\:';.:.';:':j\;;X:';:?G:;:~-;j};/(i-;;_D:~: 't+: ',. .,",_ -, :',y".:'i _ _ _ _ - , - ", __'. _ ,,_ " _ _ _ _ ': __ _> ~~:- ,::;:,_;~,,\:> 'I
:"In addition to" meeting the ~tandardsof the SDC, at the time of Master PIan appioyalr tile Cii)rCouncil may i
attach specific conditions on'iilldevelbpinent within the MSor MoCi'ori~sii1clud;rlg but not limited to !
"building height and setback~, .The .sta}1dards, conditions, and proced~efor ~ee'ded housing shall be clear .
land objective ahd shall'riot have. the effect, either alone or cumulatively,:ofdlscoullaging needed housing
,through unreaso?able'costordeiay.'!.'~" ." :c,c"Cdcnll~. . .
lThis PO~iCY should ~ake clear that there is a l~ton the standards ah~;~:k(li'ti~;;;"tat City. Council may
, _" -. ".. '" '" . " .". . ...." _" '.:., . . .~ .,-,,",r '" _ . ,.
:impose on approval of needed housing in this plan area. As written,it suggests thar th(: city may use any
;st'!lldardS and i~pose any~~ndition:;n needed hou:ing,qevelopmeqt.J > "Ii,.
!Action 15. I: Asdrafted,thi~ '~'qensiiY transfer" provision decreasis r~s;dentiaI ~e~ityon development sites
;that contain natural resources err 'opeirspace. The" policy provides that housing units may be moved froin
;unbuildable Go,~r 5 res01lr~e!~eiis"r79~ea~io~aIpath"w~ys; or shaf(ldfpeIlispace; t~b~ildable afeas of the
:development, at the same maxImum denSIty as the base zone. Ho.wever,JlItless,tht: CIty re-zones more land'
! _ --' .. _'-'- -... ..,',,'-. ',"-,'.. ," _.;, ", ","""' "- ,. '''''f~}' f . <<'. '~""""". >- ..' '.",; .'.... ". . ,':'. : '",' ,,' '.dL "_~ .. .M "".'
in ,the dexd,?pin~l!-t area to Jesiqel)ti<!l;, there is no pl~c~Jo,'put the)ransferred liiiits;~ the buildable part of the :
'site'can cirrrently'be;developedup to tI1e maximuin density for, the basezone3he:bnIy way to truly" transfer:
~dei1sity fromo~epttofakit~.to.u;,otheristo taketh~,~;UcMated ri~ber;6fuhits~futilieunbuildable area '
': _, ':':j,- -1' >,y> sf"'~<::-_:i_:":+~:,:'"::::f#"':': "i,:i;, '-, ";':', ,"':'~' : i. '. ~ij:i:;"",,,,,,!y_>d;'::-:,::T;-'f/{~: j.::: ." \i "_" ;',' .: " :':' <:
'and transfer tl1e!ll'tocthe'Duilqable';"are,a;"wliich int;,ans:alIo\0rigCa)iiglier'density in th,ebuilgable portion of
i:~~i~~~~~~' ;l%~~~f~;~~jJ:~~~)~~ :a~n~~~~~~~6lt~~W~::S~~~~'~~n~~8~:~r:~e~:S~'~one I
:stapdard.tm~i~ what~om:cities'!yn~re~lations do.H"'''' 1":"':" -' . !
" l"~ :i}1hl'" . ,~\ "', ~ r;;""
.',111
"":%',~:" !
> rty,'" ;
II,"~;~I
I'
,F"
'\~
, '. v:;//0+t;~:'A\".?;:_,'". :.::" ,
,Gloria Gardinerl Urbaii;Pljlnnih!rSpe:ciaIist,
,Planning ServiceSDivi~iori" ~="' '~I" 'I \ I-'
;Oregon Dept. of.r;an~""C:9g~erVaiioll~i!Pd Development,., ..,'% . Id' :. ::!
,635 Capitol ~1:re-eiNE"SI!i!e;1501,Sa!~il1; OR 91301-2:~.40='=""=:~:i:;,
Offjce:(503}373-0050 ext.282,1 F~": (503) 378-5518'.'" ",w'",;
· gloria. gardii1er@state:of .Us~ln<rilib! glpga. gardiner@stiiie:gf.lis>
. " " -',,~ "". .,i'"."'"y,,:,~,~.,,-- . . ,:-i""":,.h,x,,;+"_:"('; :.F'--P"" ':"'."'.:, '.' ". __'" u; "Y'''.:
, l~:Q[~gO!(gQyi'LCJ:)<htti:J://www.orel!on:l!ov/LCD~..",.:",;,~~...:2..!
..i
3
Ii
,I
Ii ;>/; . /
Date Receiyed' i;~/~7
Planner; AL
Ii
\,
'j;
,.
I
L1MBIRD Andrew
"
I,
'i
i'
II
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
MOTT Gregory
Monday, March 23, 2009 10:38 AM
L1MBIRD Andrew "
FW: Springfield PAPA 001-09: Amending Gateway Refinement P'ian
"
I;
I
And~ i:
I,
~I
The comments below are a response to the,information we provid~d to DLCD with the nciti~e; these are from Gloria
Gardiner. Let me know quickly if you have any concerns. II
'I
Ii
gmott
From: Ed Moore [mailto:ed.w.moore@state.or.us]
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 10:31 AM
To: MOTT Gregory
Subject: Fwd: Springfield PAPA 001-09: Amending Gateway Refinement Plan
,
It
"
II
,~
Greg,
As ~e discussed, let me know if you would iike me to subinit these suggestions as p~ of the official record.
don't see any of them as deal stoppers; but per our no SUlJlrises agreement and given the late date that I
received them I don't feel the need to submit them ifthey would delay your adoption!!
I,
Ed
II
I:
~!
Ed Moore AICP
So Willamette Valley
Regional Representative
OLCO Springfield Office
644 A Street
Springfield, OR 97478
971.239.9453
~d_w_moorefa)state.or.us I www.ore~mn.Q"ov fLCO
I'
,
>>> On 2009.03.20 at 12:26, in message <49C38B8A.6954.00FC.0IaJlcd.state_or.uJ~ Gloria Gardi~er wrote:
;HCEd~ Sorryilly,cciiillrt~Ilis<iresolat~;Monday 3/23:istheJax de~dliIle. - -1--
t . J_ ".~om', ;',~ ~ }, "d'" ,~;~~, :~1'-_~;-~:::-~:': _,:-~ ,-"'- " ".-~ :'A)>.", "~t";_-': :' ~::~/, ' ,,'" t_ '
iMy commentsllreontheamendw_el1tsin f:x1Vbit };3., [;,l is a sug'geste~ de]etion;,a ~~ggestedaddition is in
[bold. .>;\ \ - , . - --II
i . , .~i,.'..__.. ","
"" "~_";--_:' t( ~~- "
Residenti~"Eiemeni'policv.aIid Imnlementation Actfo'Ils.
-I.
,
1
Ii
Date Received'
Planner: AL
3/.73/ .)LxJt;
, /
i
I.
\'
. .
.~ ..~. -,. ~"'''' "N",'"'''' '~', W,~,.,,_ -~--oT:>',~-" w'~. '-,_ ._, -. ",'-::" . - ... ,~ - ~.~_,;:;I'\-':w~y~~~,~~~~,,:_,:_;__~,__--,w*_~,w,"'''_~'~~,~-'-- ._-C'~'-'~-:
Action 2: lTecorirmendrevisirigas,[cilIows,to'ensure consistency:with(]oal'10:Hotising; OAR 660, division'
i8,ahd the:nt:gil~dholislfilfSfut1it~S!iri ()l~S"ch~pt~i,)9!:;;i '",' " '.",; .'J' '. I
"'::I;;;:+~';(_:':~~",,, ,_,_-~.::,:,\_, ,'~I :'~~:->i; -;i-;';,:""":;:;~-Y::":>::;l:"~-:"'-{', _ ,,' t
'iEnsureavailabi~ity.oD[a4equateJneeded .s~pplie~ Of lang/pi 10:V7, medium-,andbhig117?ensi~ residential
;development while';llIowmgfor an appropnate mix o[col)l1Ilerclal, emploYl11entand.resldentlal uses.i'
~ ' -?; (:'f.;"~:i.-" r;': -,~>,;,s:"cl'f:,':~' "'''','... ' . P.. __ '-c,:,: :~_i;~<>_>~,,;,, ',<_ ~;; Jfi:".':;~
, . ,', _ .'. .,. .' .:' w -,," <',: ....:,' "'_' '1. - >_'" "'.,.": ".' .', ... "".I"""'",r, ,."'~;~"'_,,"Y'o' - "
'''Adequate:' isJoo yagueand unaefmed: This p~liC"yslioi.&fbe clear1ycon~lstentwithSpringfield's
1. .,,- ,-" "','.. ",,-" '0:':,"":" _",. -"-:"-', >!."-cc.-- ,',~. .....~., _'_;::'_'_' ,",,"_'''', ::'_ .,'~. _",__,,-,,""" .,~::.a e."" _,,"
obligation to ensUre a supply ofland intheUGB tomeettl1e housing. needs of all qf its'residenFs according ,
to itshou~ing hindneedsall~~~is.' .. '; . .... ... .1 '. '. . .
,Action 12.6: I ieCOInII1endre~ising, thel~t sent~riceas f61i;wsifor consistency ;i~~ the Goal'lO:H.ousing,
OAR 660, division 8;' mid the neeileilhousing statutes)1l.0RSchapter 197:' ....,1. ,
!', /,-'<" ~,^,~,/:~~J~:;:'>;,-~:\.:-, <'~~~;~:','4',~"'", -:~>;T-' ,-_,',_ _. -.. _, ',1'~:,~" "':-~:L ,,- j " .. "~
i"In,addition to,ll)eeting.t)1e.standar4,sbfthe SDC, at the time ofMasterPI~ appro~al,.theCitYC;:ouncilmay
attach specific conditjons on all.develoP!llent witllint~~M~ or}vlYC;: ~on:sinclud~ng but not liInit~d to
9uildiltg iI.~ight and;~etbacks. !Ii,~ s~andl!~ds, c~n~itions, and p~oced;ur~1!oi~eededhousing shaII.be . . I
;cIear. and'.ob j ective;tnd.'shaU not,h~ve' the.'err,~ct~~~t~~.;<~1!l1l~.9~.c.Il11.';!a;i;~.I~;f?fd~S~OU~l!~ill~.'lleede.d '
housmg.through.unr.easo.l1able. cpst or Ilelay., ,.....:."". ..,. .', ....~........, . .,
iThis policy shouldmake.clearthat ~ere.isaJimit!?:nth.eWrAll.4,.ard~.ai1d.conditions that (';itY; COlm.cil may. .,
!impos~ori'approvi?.1 ofneeoedhousifig'inthis plan ro;~a::e.:.s.~tt~?,,it suggests.thaf.t?c ci~[nay.use.any
!~~dardsan9 ,imp~sieJ:~:c~:~:iti~~Si~.~..lle,eded.h?,~:~~~;~eIO~?~nt'. 'ti'. ..... .:.~:;i{c. ..... w." . .;'
Action 15,1:. Asdrafted,Jhis"densitytransfer"provis!o!i de.C('eases residentiali:l~iisj.iYor 4.evelopment
;sites that contai!l'llatIra!'resOlirces oi:open space. The policy'provides ,that )1oysil1g units may be moved . I
from unbuildable Goal'Sresourceareas, recreational pathways, or shared open space, to'buildableareas of
:the development, atthe same maxilluIin:;de11$ity as the b~e zone, ,However, l)hles~: the~ity ~e~zOl;es ~ore
hmd in the i1evelopmeritareaito residential, there is no place to put the transferred'iinits; the buildable part of
,_ ". !tn","
the site can currently be developed up to the maximum density for the base :lone. Tihe only. way' to truly
transfer density from one part(jfasite fa another isto,takethecalcuiatea numbeI-: tif units for the .
,unbuildable area andtrarisferth~m to tl1ebuildable area, which means allowing a Higher densitym the
.buildable portion of the'site'(re.';clustering th~~l1owed'housing OIithe buildable p~rtionof the site and .'
;jJreservingthe unbuildableportions fr~mdevelopmellt),'sotlJat the site's pveral1 dJl)sity.doesn't .fall'below
.thebase zonestandard,i,This'iswhat somecities',PUDiregulations.do.' ., II... .
L' -, < . - - --__'''_/'~-,,--;'<",''-,f>-:'~: /"<;:;'1"'': --\_0-J;L<'1f~~S>_~;~-L_<i"1Lq~",/ - _ j--;---
n
"j
.'
~. "5 ~/ K, 0'/:0 :
r,-., _ -~ "_~_r '", ~,,{~"~ ::,~ _' ..', _ ", _ ""..'-
iGloriaGardinel'l Urban Plamllng'.Speciali~t.
'Plani1ing,Services'Division'. .,. .
bregon Dept. of LaJ1d.9oll~ervati6nandDevelopniellt.r:/""
63SGapitolStie'et'NE,Suite' 1.S01 S~le!p, OR 973 Q L~2S40i..i
;9ftlce: (S03)j73-0050'ex'C2~~.IFax:; (S03) 378-SS1 8 ,"
l!loria.2:ardinei!aJ$tife:oLus.l.wWw.6reion,!!OvILCD' " ,
-I--~
',I
,
I'
Date Rebeived'
P " .
lanner;ll AL
I'
"
Jh/JP"'1
2