Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutComments Miscellaneous 4/6/2009 .. L1MBIRD Andrew From: Sent: To: Subject: Allen Johnson [alj25@qwestofficenet] Monday, April 06, 20092:29 PM L1MBIRD Andrew Re: EMX environmental assessment If there's no opposition, then don't bother. Johnson' Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 11:19 AM Subject: RE: EMX environmental assessment OK I will print them out as time permits and insert them in the file. On a side note, do we have any particular reason to expect there will be an appeal on the N'odallmplementation or is this just a precaution? Thanks Andy From: Allen Johnson [mailto:alj25@qwestoffice.net] Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 5:24 PM To: UMBIRD Andrew; MOTT Gregory Cc: GRILE Bill; Bill Van Vactor Subject: Re: EMX environmental assessment Andy, et al.: In order to be able to use it if there is an appeal, we'll need the complete hard copy of the EA, including appendices. At the public hearing, you have to wheel the hard copy into the hearing room and let the deciding body know that it is there. We'll have quite a few 3-ring binders by the time:.we are done. The same documents can be used for different proceedings, but they have to be "placed before"the deciding body at the appropriate time in each proceeding.. A typical hard-copy record for a UGB expansion runs to several thousand pages. Gre_oory ; Cc: GRILE Bill; Bill Van Vactor Sent: Friday, April 03, 20094:25 PM Subject: RE: EMX environmental assessment Gentlemen: I have inserted a hard copy of the Environmental Assessment in the Riverbend Nodal Development Overlay file, but to save paper just the two-page list of Appendices with a written notation ;'Incorporated Herein by Reference". If you would like the Appendices included in their entirety, pl~ase let me knoW., Thanks Andy From: MOTT Gregory Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 3:23 PM To: 'Allen Johnson' Cc: GRILE Bill; Bill Van Vactor; UMBIRD Andrew Subject: RE: EMX environmental assessment 1 Date Received: 0 ~_1 Planner; AL /'.., ( Thanks;AI. I'm forwarding this to Andy Limbird, assigned planner, so that he can act on yo~r recommendations. gmott From: Allen Johnson [mailto:alj25@qwestoffice.net] Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 10:38 AM To: MOTT Gregory Cc: GRILE Bill; Bill Van Vactor Subject: EMX environmental assessment Greg: Just took a look at the environmental assessment for the Gateway EMX. The whole thing can be downloaded from L TD's website and should probably go into the record of the Riverbend Nodal Development amendment as well as the records for the TPR amendments and maybe the UGB adoption. You c.an find it by following the EMX link on your department's web page. Chapters 3 and 4 mention that the EMX preferred alternative and the Riverbend Master Plan implement nodal development and the alternative measures requirements of the TPR. See, e.g., 3.1.2.4 - Cumulative Effects . -AI 2 Date t~eceiJed: Planner: A~, fh/Jh 7 . I " j: ( . L1MBIRD Andrew From: Sent: To: Subject: L1MBIRD Andrew Monday, April 06, 2009 11 :20 AM 'Allen Johnson' RE: EMX environmental assessment OK I will print them out as time permits and insert them in the file. , On a side note, do we have any particular reason to expect there will be an appeal on the N&dallmplementation or is this just a precaution? Thanks Andy From: Allen Johnson [mailto:alj25@qwestoffice.net] Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 5:24 PM . To: UMBIRD Andrew; MoTT Gregory Cc: GRILE Bill; Bill Van Vactor Subject: Re: EMX environmental assessment If Andy, et al.: In order to be able to use it if there is an appeal, we'll need the complete ,'hard copy ofthe EA, including appendices. At the public hearing, you have to wheel the hard copy into th~ hearing room and let the deciding body know that it is there. We'll have quite a few 3-ring binders by the time We are done. The same .1 documents can be used for different proceedings, but they have to be "placed before" the deciding body at the appropriate time in each proceeding.. A typical hard-copy record for a UGB expansiqp runs to several thousand pages. To: MOTT Greaory ; 'Allen Cc: GRILE Bill; Bill Van Vactor Sent: Friday, April 03, 20094:25 PM Subject: RE: EMX environmental assessment Gentlemen: I have inserted a hard copy of the Environmental Assessment in the Riverbend :'Nodal Development Overlay file, but to save paper just the two-page list of Appendices with a written notation "Incorporated Herein by Reference". , If you would like the Appendices included in their entirety, please let me know. Thanks'. Andy From: MOTT Gregory Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 3:23 PM To: 'Allen Johnson' Cc: GRILE Bill; Bill Van Vactor; UMBIRD Andrew Subject: RE: EMX environmental assessment Thanks, AI. I'm forwarding this to Andy Limbird, assigned planner, so that he can act on you'r recommendations. II . i gmott From: Allen Johnson [mailta:alj25@qwestoffice.net] Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 10:38 AM To: MOTT Gregory 1 Date ReC~ived:~~of Planner: ~L j~ , , , ; , Cc: GRILE Bill; Bill Van Vactor Subject: EMX environmental assessment Greg: ! Just took a look at the environmental assessment for the Gateway EMX. The whole thing can be downloaded from LTD's website and should probably go into the record of the Riverbend Nodal Development amendment as well as the records for the TPR amendments and maybe the UGB adoption. You dill find it by following the " EMX link on your department's web page. Chapters 3 and 4 mention that the EMX preferred alternative and the Riverbend Master Plan implement nodal development and the alternative measures requirements of the TPR. I. ffi " See, e.g., 3.1.2.4 - Cumu atlve E ects -AI 2 Date Received: 1p&1 Planner: . AL