The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAIS PLANNER 6/1/2009 ., (.\ ~t' City Council Agenda , City Manager: Gino Grimaldi City Recorder: Amy Sowa 726.3700 City Hall 225 Fifth Street Springfield, Oregon 97477 541.726.3700 Online at www.ci.springfieId.or.us I Citv Council Sid Leiken, Mayor Christine Lundberg, Ward 1 Hillary Wylie, Ward 2 Terri Leezer, Ward 3 Dave Ralston, Ward 4 Vacant, Ward,S Joe Pishioneri, Ward 6 The meeting location is wheelchair-accessible. For the hearing-impaired, an interpreter can be provided with 48 hours notice prior to the meeting. For meetings in the Council Meeting Room, a "Personal P A Receiver" for the hearing impaired is available. To arrange for these services, call 726-3700. Meetings will end prior to 10:00 p.m. unless extended by a vote .ofthe Council. . ~'v V All proceedings before the City Council are recorded June ], 2009 6:00 p.m. Executive Session Pursuant to ORS ] 92.502(1) and ORS 192.660(2)( d) Jesse Maine Room CALL TO ORDER' ROLL CALL - Mayor Leiken --' Councilors Lundber~ Wylie~ Leezer--, Ralston--, and Pishioneri . I. Bargaining Update. [Bill Spiry] ADJOURNMENT 6:30 p.m. Work Session Jesse Maine Room CALL TO ORDER (30 Minutes) ROLL CALL - Mayor Leiken --' Councilors Lundberg--, Wylie~. Leezer--, Ralston--, and Pishioneri - I. Main Street (Hwy 126B) Pedestrian Safety Update. [David Reesor] t." . \ \ , . ,1 ,,~) \ . \ 1'.'- ,..... . \. ,H"-_ . \ (15 Minutes) ...;'1"# 'I~' ~. Date ,'1eceived:4/Joor; Planner: AL . 0'-',\ . '.);..:_? ~"_. , Council Agenda June I, 2009 Page 2 2. Ward 5 Vacancy Process. [Gino Grimaldi] (10 Minutes) ADJOURNMENT 7:00 p.m. Regular.Meeting Council Meeting Room !=ALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL- Mayor Leiken ~ Councilors Lundberg I, Wylie ~ Leezer ./, Ralston /' and Pishioneri ./. . . PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE SPRINGFIELD UPBEAT I. Springfield School District Gift of Literacy Proclamation. [Mayor Leiken] (05 Minutes) 2. HomeOwnership Month Proclamation. [Mayor Leiken] (05 Minutes) CONSENT CALENDAR I. Claims 2. Minutes . a. May] 1,2009 - Work Session b. May ]8, 2009 - Work Session c. May] 8, 2009 - Regular Meeting 3. Resolutions ,. , , ; , I .i a. RESOLUTION NO. ] - A RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT PROJECT P20545: 5TIl STREET OVERLAY. MAIN STREET TO "G" STREET FROM EUGENE SAND AND GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY IN THE AMOUNT OF $371.642.56. 4. Ordinances ---5> a. ORDINANCE NO. I - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD METROPOLITAN AREA GENERAL PLAN !METRO PLAN) DIAGRAM BY ADOPTING A NODAL DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DESIGNATION FOR APPROXIMA TEL Y ] 68 ACRES OF LAND WITHIN THE MCKENZIE-GATEWAY MDR SITE. I ~ ~ Date Received: Planner: AL .j,... , C,/I/~'1 I I ,( "'i Council Agenda June 1,2009 Page 3 5. Other Routine Matters a. Approval of Amendments No. I to Agreement No. 23,409 with ODOT for the Addition of $1,400,000 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Funds to the City's Pioneer Parkway Overlay (P20438) and Authorize the City Manager to Execute the Agreement on Bernlf ofthe City. b. Approval of the Proposed Designation Agreement between the Governments of Lane County and the Cities of Eugene and Springfield Designating the Lane County Board of Commissioners as the Chief Elected Official for the Purpose of the Implementation of the Work Force Investment Act of ]998. MOTION: APPROVE/REJECT THE CONSENT CALENDAR I ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR PUBLIC HEARINGS - Please limit comments to 3 minutes: Reqnest to speak cards are available at both entrances. Please present cards to City Recorder. Speakers may not yield .their time to others. I. Supplemental Budget Resolution. [Bob Brew] (l0 Minutes) RESOLUTION NO.2 - A RESOLUTION ADJUSTING RESOURCES AND REOUIREMENTS IN THE FOLLOWING FUNDS: GENERAL. SPECIAL REVENUE. RIVERBEND DEVELOPMENT. BUILDING CODE..FlRE LOCAL OPTION LEVY, BOND SINKING~SEWER CAPITAL PROJECTS. DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS. DRAINAGE CAPITAL PROJECTS. STREET CAPITAL. SDC LOCAL STORM ~ROVEMENT. SDC LOCAL WASTEWATER IMPROVEMENT. SDC TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT. LOCAL W ASTEW A TER OPERATIONS. AMBULANCE. DRAINAGE OPERATING. REGIONAL FIBER CONSORTIUM. INSURANCE. AND VEHICLE & EQUIPMENT. MOTION: ADOPT/NOT ADOPT RESOLUTION NO.2. 2. Adoption of Local Wastewater Systems Development Charge Methodology, Project List, and Charges. [Len Goodwin] (30 Minutes) RESOLUTION NO.3 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD COMMON COUNCIL MODIFYING A METHODOLOGY FOR THE CALCULATION OF LOCAL W ASTEW ATER SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT CHARGES AND SETTING AN EFFECTIVE DATE RESOLUTION NO.4 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD COMMON COUNCIL ADOPTING A LIST OF CAPITAL ~ROVEMENTS TO BE FUNDED BY SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT CHARGES. AND SETTING AN EFFECTIVE DATE RESOLUTION NO.5 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD COMMON COUNCIL ADOPTING A SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT CHARGE AND SETTING AN EFFECTIVE DATE MOTION: ADOPT/NOT ADOPT RESOLUTION NO.3. MOTION: ADOPT/NOT ADOPT RESOLUTION NO.4. MOTION: ADOPT/NOT ADOPT RESOLUTION NO.5. ~ ..1;... ; "f ,~':.' j , I ; -.=. Date Received: Planner: AL t.~/~1 / ) Council Agenda June ],2009 Page 4 3. Substantial Amendment to FY08-09 One- Year Action Plan, Springfield Section, to Include CDBG-R Allocations as Authorized under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of2009. [Kevin Ko] (I 5 Miimtes) MOTION: APPROVE/NOT APPROVE OR MODIFY THE PROPOSEDSUBST ANTlAL AMENDMENT TO THE FY08~9 ONE-YEAR ACTION PLAN. BUSINESS FROM THE AUDIENCE - Limited to 20 minntes. Please limit comments to 3 minutes. Reqnest to Speak cards are available at both entrances. Please present cards to City Recorder. Speakers may not. yield their time to others. COUNCIL RESPONSE CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS 1. CVH~'l'v"dence from -Ivan Koehn, Eugene, Oregon, Regarding the Sustainable Development Project of Agenda 21, United Nations of] 992. MOTION: ACCEPT FOR FILING ANDIOR PROVIDE STAFF DIRECTlON/FOLLOWUP. BIDS ORDINANCES BUSINESS FROM THE CITY COUNCIL I. Committee Appointments a. MayorlCouncil Committee Assigninents. [Amy Sowa/Mayor Leiken] (05 Minutes) 2. Business from Council a. Committee Reports b. Other Business ,.. \ l, ., . ,.~ '\1,-.)..' l Date r'{eceived: Planner: AL (, II I ;)4P'f , I ,~., ,.~ . <c;' +. '~ ; Council Agenda June 1,2009 Page 5 BUSINESS FROM THE CITY MANAGER I. Recommended Funding Allocations - Additional FY2009 Funding for the Springfield Home Ownership Program (SHOP) and Additional Incentive for the Purchase of Homes that have been Foreclosed Upon. [Jodi Peterson] (10 Minutes) MOTION: APPROVE/MODIFY/NOT APPROVE AN ADDITIONAL $200,000 FOR THE FY2009 SHOP. MOTION: APPROVE/MODIFY /NOT APPROVE AN INCENTIVE OF A $4,000 GRANT IN ADDITION TO THE SHOP ASSISTANCE LOAN TO LOW AND MODERATE-INCOME FIRST TIME HOMEBUYERS WHO PURCHASE A HOME THAT HAS BEEN FORECLOSED UPON. 2. Amended Annexation Agreement between Daniel Jackson and the City of Springfield and Annexation of a Portion of 19'h Street Right-of-Way. . [Matt Stouder] (10 Minutes) RESOLUTION NO.6 - A RESOLUTION INITIATING ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD PURSUANT TO SECTION 5.7 OF THE SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT CODE. MOTION: ADOPT/NOT ADOPT A MOTION TO APPROVE THE AMENDED ANNEXATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN DANIEL JACKSON (APPLICANT) AND THE CITY. MOTION: ADOPT/NOT ADOPT RESOLUTION NO.6. 3. Ratification of the Metropolitan Wastewater Management Commission (MWMC) FY09"1O Regional Wastewater Program Budget and Capital Improvements Program (ClP). [Ron Bittler] (l0 Minutes) MOTION: RATIFY/NOT RATIFY THE FY09-10 REGIONAL WASTEWATER PROGRAM BUDGET AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP). 4. Request for Permit to Work Outside Hours of 7 a.m. and 6 p.m., LID ErnX Construction - P50288. [Kristi Krueger] (] 0 Minutes) MOTION: ALLOW/NOT ALLOW CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES OUTSIDE OF THE HOURS OF 7 AM AND 6 PM WITH CONDITIONS AS DESCRIBED IN ATTACHMENT I FOR THE EMX CONSTRUCTION PROJECT P50288 IN THE AREAS OF PIONEER PARKWAY AS DESCRIBED IN . ATTACHMENT 2. BUSINESS FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY ADJOURNMENT Date h6ceived:~/,i# j Planner:. AL . AGENDA ITEM SUMMAh. r Meeting Date: June 1,2009 Meeting Type: Regular Session Department: Development Services Staff Contact: Andy Limbird S P R I N G FIE L D Staff Phone No: 726-3784 C I T Y C 0 U N C I L Estimated Time: Consent Calendar ITEM TITLE: AMEND THE EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD METROPOLITAN AREA GENERAL PLAN (METRO PLAN) DIAGRAM TO IMPLEMENT A NODAL DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT FOR THE MCKENZIE-GATEWAY MDR SITE. ACTION REQUESTED: ISSUE STATEMENT: ATTACHMENTS: DlSCUSSION/ FINANCIAL IMPACT: Conduct a second reading and adopt/not adopt the following Ordinance: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD METROPOLITAN AREA GENERAL PLAN (METRO PLAN) DIAGRAM BY ADOPTING A NODAL DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DESIGNATION FOR APPROXIMATELY 168 ACRES OF LAND WITHIN THE MCKENZIE-GATEWAY MDR SITE. The City Council is asked to conduct a second reading and adopt/not adopt an ordinance to implement Nodal Development Overlay Designation (NDO) for approximately 168 acres of northwest Springfield. The subject area is identified in adopted plans as the "McKenzie- Gateway MDR Site." \. Staff Report and Findings 2. Vicinity, Neighborhood and Site Maps 3. McKenzie-Gateway MDR Site Map 4. Ordinance No. 6109 Amending the Gateway Refmement Plan 5. TransPlan Potential Nodal Development Areas.Map 6. Email correspondence from DLCD and Bonnie Ullmann 7. Planning Commission Recommendation 8. Ordinance The subject area is located between Game Farm Road and the McKenzie River; and between Deadmond Ferry Road and residential properties on Wayside Loop. Approximately 180 acres are identified for nodal implementation in TransPIan, the Gateway Refinement Plan and the Metro Plan. However, staff advises that the requested plan amendment is limited to land currently inside the City limits (approximately 168 acres). The affected area. includes the existing Sacred Heart Medical Center at RiverBend and future commercial, residential and mixed use development areas comprising the RiverBend Master Plan area. As unincorporated areas within the planned nodal implementation area request annexation, the City Council may consider whether to implement the NDO designation on a case-by-case basis. City Council held a public hearing and gave first reading to the adopting Ordinance at the regular meeting on May 18,2009. One person provided verbal testimony at the public hearing. No testimony obiecting to the proposed ordinance has been submitted to the record. Date F(eCeived:4/~7 Planner: AL Type IV Metro Plan Amendment. Staff Report and Findings Hearinq Date: April 21", 2009 '. Planning Commission Case Number: LRP 2009-00001 May 18th, 2009 City Council Aoolicant Prooertv Owners , Aoolicant's Representative NlA City of Springfield 225 Fifth Street . Springfield, OR 97477 PeaceHealth Oregon Women's Care Properties LLC City of Springfield Date Submitted: January 29, 2009 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The subject area is contemplated for nodal development in planning documents adopted by the City, including the Metro Plan, TransPlan, the Gateway Refinement Plan, and the RiverBend Master Plan. The Springfield City Council adopted the amended RiverBend Master Plan on June 19, 2006. Condition #12 of the Master Plan approval reads: 'The City Council hereby initiates the application of the Nodal Overlay Plan Designation at the entirety of the McKenzie Gateway MDR Site as identified in the Gateway Refinement Plan.' The McKenzie Gateway MDR Site {now more commonly known as. RiverBend) was identified in a ConcePtual Development Plan prepared by the City in 1994. Council adopted Ordinance 6109 (amending the Metro Plan and Gateway Refinement Plan) on January 10, , 2005 with the intent of preserving the potential for nodal development in the RiverSend neighborhood. These adopted plan amendments set the stage for development of this area with the'Sacred Heart Medical Center and campus. Consistent with the adopted plan amendments and City Council's direction, staff are presenting the nodal development implementation action for consideration by the Planning Commission and City Council. The Planning Commission adopted a recommendation of support for the proposal by a 5-0 vote at the April 21, 2009 meeting. REQUEST: .. Staff are requesting approval to implement the Nodal Development Overlay .District (NDO) designation for approximately 168 acres of the PeaceHealth campus. The NDO District would supplement the zoning designations in the area, which include Community Commercial (CC), Mixed Use Commercial (MUG) and Medium Density Residential (MDR). Current zoning for the affected properties is Medical Services (MS), CC and MDR. A Metro Plan Amendment at this time (not during Periodic Review) is known as a Post-Acknowledgement Plan Amendment (PAPA). . , SITE DESCRIPTION: The affected properties comprise approximately 168 acres and are identified as Assessor's Map 17- 03-14-00, Tax Lot 1900; and Map 17-03-22-00, Tax Lots 100, 200, 903, 904, 3401-3403 and 3600- 4300. The subject properties include the developed SliIcred Heart Medical Center site and ancillary ATTACHMENT 1 - 1 Date Received: (/ !Jro'- Planner: AL / . buildings; the Women's Care Center; and vacant future development areas surrounding the hospital. The affected properties have no jurisdictional wetlands or inventoried G~al 5 natural or. historic resources. Although not an inventoried historic resource, a pioneer graveyard discovered during excavation work at the south end of the subject area was surveyed and relocated in 2008. The site is within the Springfield Urban Growth BoundarY,. and all the subject properties were previously annexed into the City of Springfield. The subject properties are within the Gateway Refinement Plan area. . The affected properties are bordered on the east by the McKenzie .River. The abutting properties to the north and south are outside the City limits and zoned Low Density Residential (LDR). The areas immediately west of the site are outside the City limits and zoned LDR and MDR. This proposed plan amendment only affects properties currently inside the City limits. However, the . ultimate boundaries of the. RiverBend nodal development overlay area could logically include properties on Deadmond Ferry Road, Game Farm Road and Baldy View Lane that are outside the current City limits. As these property owners request annexation, the City Council will have the opportunity to incorporate the property into the RiverBend nodal development overlay area on a case- by-case basis. REVIEW PROCESS: The proposed Metro Plan Amendment is a Type II Amendment because it is located inside the city . limits and is site specific. In accordance with SDC 5.14-135.B and 5.14-140, a Type \I Metro Plan amendment inside the city limits shall be presented to the Planning Commission for consideration and recommendation, and to the City Council for final action. The City Council initiated the Nodal Development Overlay designation for the subject area by adopting the amended RiverBend Master Plan in 2006. Staff initiated this Post-Acknowledgement Plan Amendment on January 29, 2009. A notice and supplementary information was mailed to the Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) on February 12, 2009. Representatives of the affected property owners (PeaceHealth and the Women's Care Center) were contacted.directly in mid-March prior to issuance of the hearing notice. The public hearing notice waS mailed out on April 1, 2009 to property owners within 300 feet of the proposed Nodal Development" Overlay District implementation area per Section 5.2-115.A.1-14 of the Springfield Development Code (SDC). Advertised notice of the public hearing was published in the local newspaper (Register Guard) on April 11'", 2009, as required in Section 5.2-115.B of the SDC. . . . . Since this application was initiated by the City Council, staff have responded to three telepho'ne calls requesting clarification on the proposed amendments and possible impacts to properties adjacent to the subject area. No substantive concerns were raised. Staff provided follow Lip written clarificati.on to one caller who asked whether a conference center and hotel could be built in the nodal development area. One written comment in support of the proposal was received from Bonnie Ullmann of the Game Farm Neighbors (Attachment 6). . At the Planning Commission public hearing on April 21, 2009, verbal testimony was submitted by Philip Farrington, Land Use Planning & Development. Director for PeaceHealth. Mr. Farrington expressed support for implementation of the nodal development designation, but noted that certain nodal development overlay standards may present site design challenges. Mr. Farrington also stated that, as other properties within the McKenzie-Gateway MDR site are annexed to the City, individual property owners shouldn't have to bear the additional cost of implementing the nodal development designation. . Date Received: Planner: AL t~/ dfPP7 / ATTACHMENT 1 - 2 .. As a result of the submitted testimony, the Planning Commission added Statement #4 on the Planning Commission Recommendation (see Attachment 7) recommending that the City initiate the same amendments to any of the subject properties that seek annexation and this plan designation. METRO PLAN DESIGNATION: The subject property is designated Commercial and Medium Density Residential as shown in the Metro Plan diagram. Specific Findings related to the Metro Plan are discussed in this report. ' METRO PLAN DIAGRAM AMENDMENT CRITERIA OF APPROVAL-SDC 5.14-135.C.1 and2 'The following criteria shall be applied by the City Council in approving or denying a Metro Plan amendment application: , 1. ' The amendment must be consistent with the relevant Statewide planning goals adopted by the ' Land ConseNation and Development Commission; and 2. Adoption of the amendment must not make the Metro Plan intemally inconsistent. CRITERIA OF APPROVAL - SDC 5.14-135.C.1, 1. The amendment must be consistent with the relevant Statewide planning goals adopted by the Land ConselVation and Development Commission. STAFF FINDINGS RELATED TO COMPLIANCE WITH GOAL 1: Goal 1 - Citizen Involvement: To develop a citizen involvement program that insures the opportunity for citizens to be involved in all phases of the planning proc'755; Finding 1: Goal 1 addresses the need to develop a citizen involvement program to ensure citizen ' involvement in all phases of the land use planning process. The Planning Commission and the City Council will hold public hearings and accept testimony on, the proposal. Through the procedures .established by the City, citizens have received notice of hearings in a generally published local paper (Register Guard) and have the opportunity to be heard regarding the proposed plan amendment. Notice of the public hearings was also given to property owners within 300 feet of the proposed Plan Amendment area in. accordance with SDC 5.2~115.A1-14 requirements. In addition, the provisions of ORS 197.610 regarding local govemment notice of proposed amendment provided to the Department of Land Conservation and Development has been observed. Since the proposed amendment complies with the City's citizen involvement program and citizens have opportunities to be involved in the procedure, the proposed amendment is consistent with Goal 1. '. STAFF FINDINGS RELATED TO COMPLIANCE WITH GOAL 2: G()al 2:. Land Use Planning: To establish a land use, planning process and policy framework as a basis for all decision and actions related to use of land and to assure an adequate factual base for such decisions and actions. Finding 2: Goal 2 requires that local comprehensive plans be consistent with the Goals, that local " comprehensive plans beintemally consistent, and that implementing ordinances be consistent with acknowledged comprehensive plans. Goal 2 also requires that larid. use decisions be coordinated with affected jurisdictions. and that they be supported by an adequate factual base. ATTACHMENT 1 - 3 Date Received. i/;//JrP1 Planner: AL Because the proposed plan amendment does not affect properties outside the current city limits, the City sent referral notice of the proposed amendment to the City of Eugene and Lane County on April 8, 2009 extending "interested party" status to each government. The City sent the statutorily required notice of the initial public hearing more than 45 days in advance to the state Department of Land Conservation and Development, ensuring that they are given opportunity for comment and review on conformity to applicable statewide planning goals. The DLCD reviewed the submitted materials and. advised they do not have concerns or objections with the proposed plan amendment (see Attachment 6). The Metro. Plan and the SDC, as well as the Statewide Planning Goals and applicable statutes, provide policies and criteria for the evaluation of comprehensive plan amendments. Compliance with these measures assures an adequate factual base for. approval of the proposed Metro Plan amendment. As discussed elsewhere in this document, the proposed plan amendment is consistent with the Metro Plan and the Goals. Amendments to the Metro Plan and the Gateway Refinement Plan adopted in 2005 and 2006 provide for nodal development in the subject area, and are consistent with the proposed plan amendment. The subject area is also identified as Site 7B on the adopted "Potential Nodal Development Areas" map in TransPlan. Therefore, by demonstrating such compliance, the amendments satisfy the consistency element of Goal 2. STAFF FINDINGS RELATED TO COMPLIANCE WITH GOAL 3: . Goal 3 - Agricultural Land: To preserve and maintain agricultural lands. Finding 3: This goal is inapplicable because as provided in OAR 660-15-000(3), Goal 3 applies only to rural agricultural lands. The subject properties are located within an acknowledged urban growth boundary, are inside Springfield's corporate limits, and are not in agricultural use. STAFF FINDINGS RELATED TO COMPLIANCE WITH GOAL 4: Goal 4 - Forest Land: To .conserve forest lands by maintaining the forest land base and to protect the state's forest economy by making possible economically efficient forest practices. that assure the continuous growing and harvesting of forest tree. species as the leading USe on forest land consistent with sound management of soil, air, water, and fish . and wildlife resources and to provide for recreational opportunities and agriculture. Finding 4: Goal 4 does not apply within urban growth boundaries, per OAR 660-06-0020, and the area affected by the proposed Plan amendment is inside Springfield's acknowledge9 UGB. STAFF FINDINGS RELATED TO COMPLIANCE WITH GOAL 5: Goal 5 - Open SpaceS, Scenic and Historic Area, and Natural ResoiJrces: To conserve open space and protect natural and scenic resources. Finding 5: GoalS requires local governments to protect a variety of open space,scenic, historic, and natural resource values. Goal 5 and its implementing rule, OAR Ch. .660, . Division 16, require. planning jurisdictions, at acknowledgment and as a part of periodic review, to (1) identify such resources; (2) determine their quality, quantity, and location; (3) identify conflicting uses; (4) examine the economic, social, environmental, and energy (ESEE) consequences that could result from allowing, liniiting, or prohibiting the conflicting uses;.and . (5) develop programs to resolve the conflicts. Date Received:---0/,?h1 . Planner: AL I. ATTACHMENT 1 - 4 The subject properties are not on Springfield's acknowledged Metro Plan Goal 5 inventory. No threatened or endangered species have been inventoried on the site, and no archaeological or significant historical inventoried resources are located on the site. A pioneer graveyard discovered during site excavation work at the south edge of the RiverBend Master Plan area was surveyed and relocated in 2008. ' The National Wetland Inventory and Springfield Local Wetland Inventory maps have been consulted and there are no jurisdictional wetlands warranting protection located on the site. A cluster of small, non-significant wetlands (depicted on the Springfield Local Wetland InventorY, and identified as Site .M07 on the Springfield Natural Resources Study) are located near the northeast edge of the subject' area. These non-significant wetlands are not identified or contemplated for protection in the RiverBend Master Plan. The McKenzie River is an identified riparian resource that abuts the east boundary of the subject area. A riparian setback and conservation zone has been established within the RiverBend Master Plan area. The proposed plan amendment is only applicable to existing and future urban development areas within the RiverBend Master Plan Area, and will not have an adverse effect on protection or preservation of this resource. Therefore, the proposed amendment does not alter the City's compliance with Goal 5. STAFF FINDINGS RELATED TO COMPLIANCE WITH GOAL 6: Goal 6 - Air, Water and Land Resources Quality: To maintain and improve the quality of . the air, water and land resources of the state. . Finding 6: The purpose of Goal 6 is to maintain and improve the quality of the air, water and land resources of the state. Generally, Goal 6 requires that development comply with applicable state and federal air and water quality standards. In the context of the proposed Metro Plan amendment, Goal 6 requires. that the applicant demonstrate that it is reasonable to expect that applicable state and federal environmental quality standards can be met. The proposed plan amendment does not modify any of the Goal 6 related policies of the Metro Plan, nor does it amend the Regional Transportation Plan (TransPlan), the Springfield Development Code; ott)er applicable Goal 6 policies, or any regulations implementing those policies. . Most of the subject area lies within the 1-20 Year Time of Travel Zones and Zone of , Contribution for the Sports Way wellhead. The northeast edge of the subject area lies outside the mapped Zone of Contribution for Springfield drinking water wells. Because most of the area is regulated by the . Drinking Water Protection Overlay District, existing and future development must demonstrate compliance with the City's Drinking Water Protection standards. The proposed amendment does not alter the City's compliance with Goal 6. .. STAFF FINDINGS RELATED TO COMPLIANCE WITH GOAL 7: Goal 7 - Areas Subject to Natural Disasters and Hazards: To protect life and property from natural disasters and hazards. Finding 7: Goal 7 requires that development subject to damage from natural hazards and disasters be planned and/or constructed with appropriate safeguards and, mitigation. The goal also requires that plans be based on an inventory of known areas of natural disaster and hazards, such as areas prone to landslides, flooding, etc. . ATTACHMENT 1 - 5 Qate Received: PIC!nner: AL ,J/Jb01 I' Staff has reviewed the natural constraints map and the FEMA Floodplain Map in relation to the . subject area. The subject area is relatively flat and is not subject to landslide hazards. The eastern half of the subject area is within the mapped FEMA 100 year floodplain. A McKenzie River floodplain analysis prepared by David Evans & Associates in Noliember, 2003 has updated the flood level information for the subject area. Existing and future development in the area must demonstrate compliance with the Floodplain Overlay District provisions of the City's Development Code, including establishing building floor elevations at least one foot above the calculated flood level. Therefore, approval of the proposed Plan Amendment will not alter the City's acknowledged compliance with Goal 7 through its adopted plans, codes and procedures. STAFF FINDINGS RELATED TO COMPLIANCE WITH GOAL 8: Goal 8 - Recreation Needs: To satisfy the recreational needs of the citizens of the state and visitors and, where appropriate, to provide for the siting of necessary recreational facilities including destination resorts. . Finding 8: Goal 8 requires local governments to plan and provide for the siting of necessary recreational facilities to "satisfy the recreational needs of the citizens of the state and visitors" and, where appropriate, provide for the siting of recreational facilities including destination resorts. Staff has consulted the Willamalane 20-year Parks and Recreation Comprehensive Plan in relation to Goal . 8 compliance. The Willamalane 20-year Parks and Recreation Comprehensive Plan was adopted by the City of Springfield as part of the Metro Plan's compliance with Goal 8. According to Map 2 of the Comprehensive Plan, two future park and recreation facilities are contemplated within the eastern half of the subject area, which is identified for future residential development. The proposed plan amendment does not preclude the acquisition of public land for provision of recreational facilities, including neighborhood and special use parks as noted in the Comprehensive Plan. Therefore, the proposed plan amendment does not alter the City's compliance with Goal 8. STAFF FINDINGS RELATED TO COMPLIANCE WITH GOAL 9: Goal 9 - Economic Development: To provide adequate opportunities throughout the state for a variety .of economic activities vital to the health, weffare, and prosperity of Oregon's . citizens. Finding 9: Goal S requires the city to provide adequate opportunities for a vanety of economic activities vital to the health, welfare, and prosperity of the citizens. Because the nodal development overlay does not supplant the underlying commercial and mixed use zoning of the affected properties, and nodal designation supports and encourages more intensive development of these lands, the proposed amendment will provide additional employment opportunities by allowing more intensive site development thereby enhancing the city's capacity for economic development. Therefore, the proposed amendment further implements the City's compliance with GoarS. STAFF FINDINGS RELATED TO GOAL 10: .' Goal 10- Housing: To provide for the housing needs of citizens of the state. Finding 10: lCDC's Housing goal requires cities to maintain adequate supplies of buildable lands for needed housing, based on an acknowledged inventory of buildable lands. The 1999 Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area Residential Land and Housing Study is Springfield's most current adopted housing study related to Goal 10. The City of Springfield is also currently undergoing a new Residential lands Study that will analyze the housing inventory and projected needs for the next 20 years. Preliminary findings of the Residential lands Study suggest that there is a need for additional housing within the 2010-2030 planning period. Some. of the anticipated need Date Received:~f Planner: AL ATTACHMENT 1 - 6 ~ , could. be met through increasing density of existing residential zones. The proposed amendment would increase allowable density levels within the subject area, thus providing more housing options for Springfield residents. The residential component of the subject area is zoned MDR, and is' currently vacant. The nodal overlay would allow for housing densities to be increased up to 20% above the base standards of the MDR District. Such action is clearly consistent with intent and purpose of Goal 1 O. STAFF FINDINGS RELATED TO COMPLlANCEWITH GOAL 11: Goal 11 - Public Facilities and Services: To plan and deveiop a timely, orderly and efficient arrangement of public facilities and services as a framework for urban and rural development. . . OAR 66o-011-0005(7)(a)-(d) Definition of Public Facilities: . (a) Water (b) Sanitary Sewer (c) Stonn sewer (d) Transportation Finding 11: This goal requires the provision of a timely,-orderly and efficient arrangement of public facilities and services. The subject area is located within the Springfield UGB and city limits, and already contains a regional hospital facility and ancillary medical service buildings.. The subject area is accessed via recently-completed local and regional transportation improvements, including the Martin Luther "King, Jr. Parkway extension, Cardinal Way extension, widening of Beltline Road, and. . construction of RiverBend Drive. The proposed nodal development overlay will not affect the ability to provide needed services to the subject area. All the required urban services are existing or available to support future residential, commercial and mixed used development on the subject properties. The Metro Plan and associated facility plans have been acknowledged to conform to Goal 11, thereby ensuring that pUblic facilities and services are currently available to the subject site. Therefore, the proposed amendment does not affect the Metro Plan's compliance with Goal 11. .. STAFF FINDINGS RELATED TO COMPLIANCE WITH GOAL 12: Goal 12 - Transportation: To provide and encourage a safe, convenient. and economic transportation system. . Finding 12: Goal 12 requires local governments to provide and encourage a safe, convenient and economical transportation system. The proposed amendment involves about 168 acres of property, of which approximately 50 acres is already developed with the hospital facility and ancillary buildings. The transportation analysis prepared for the RiverBend Master Plan contemplates build-out of the subject area with a combination of commercial, residential and mixed-use .~evelopment. Nodal designation .of the' subject area was contemplated in the regional transportation plan. adopted for Eugene-Springfield (TransPlan) and long-range plans adopted by the City. Implementation of the nodal designation for the subject properties is a logical progression. of the recent and planned transportation projects that directly or indirectly benefit the subject area, including: Pioneer Parkway roundabout and MLK Jr. Parkway Extension; eastbound Beltline Road off-ramp from 1-5; Mure Gateway/Beltline intersection improvements; RiverBend Drive' construction; and installation of signalized intersections on MLK Jr. Parkway at the intersections with RiverBend Drive, Cardinal Way and Game Farm Road East. . In addition to street and intersection improvements, the subject properties will derive a direct benefit. . from the new Bus Rapid Transit (EmX) line currently being constructed to serve the Gateway area of north Springfield. Provision of a highly efficient public transportation system is a key element of the Date Received:~/J<N"1 Planner: AL ATTACHMENT 1 - 7 nodal development concept. Two EmX line transit stops are slated for construction within the subject area - one near the intersection of MLK Jr. Parkway and RiverBend Drive, and another to serve the Sacred Heart Medical Center. . Any significant intensification of development (beyond that contemplated in adopted plans and studies) will be subject to development review to assure existing transportation capacity is not exceeded. Therefore, the proposed plan amendment is consistent with Goal 12 and applicable local implementing policies. . STAFF FINDINGS RELATED TO COMPLIANCE WITH GOAL 13: Goal 13 - Energy Conservation: To conserve energy. Land and uses developed on the land shal1 be managed and control1ed so as to maximize the conservation of al1 forms of energy, based upon sound economic principles. Finding 13: The Energy goal is a general planning goal and provides . limited guidance for site-specific plan amendments. The proposed amendment has no direct impact on energy conservation, though it would arguably promote greater energy efficiency by enabling future development at increased density levels and with more transportation options within the subject area. . Therefore, the proposed amendment is consistent with, and does not alter, the City's continued compliance with Goal 13. . STAFF FINDINGS RELATED TO COMPLIANCE WITH GOAL 14: Goal 14 - Urbanization: To provide for an orderly and efficient transition from rural to urban land use. Finding 14: Goal 14 requires local jurisdictions to provide for an "orderly and efficienttransition from rural to urban land use". The subject area is within the UGB and the city limits of Springfield, and within an existing urbanized area of the community. A portion of the subject area has been intensively developed with a major hospital facility and medical campus. Therefore, Goal 14 is not applicable to this application. . STAFF FINDINGS RELATED TO COMPLIANCE WITH GOAL 15: Goal 15 - Willamette River Greenway: To protect, conserve, enhance and maintain the natural, scenic, historical, agricultural, economic and recreational qualities of lands along the Willamette River as the Willamette River Greenway. . Finding 15: Goal 15 does not apply to the proposed plan amendment because the subject area is not . located within the Willamelte River Greenway. However, similar protection measures for the McKenzie River have been implemented through the development plans adopte~ for the subject area. STAFF FINDINGS RELATED TO COMPLIANCE WITH GOALS 16-19: Goal 16 through 19: (Estuarine Resources, Coastal Shorelands, Beaches and Dunes, .and Ocean Resources). . Finding 16: The subject site is not located within any coastal, ocean, estuarine, or beach and dune resources related area. . Therefore, Goals 16-19 do not apply to this Plan Map Amendment application. . Date Received: ~~/~1 Planner: AL ATTACHMENT 1 - 8 CRITERIA OF APPROVAL - SDC 5.14-135.C.2 2. Adoption of the amendment must not make the Metro Plan internally inconsistent. STAFF FINDINGS RELATED TO 5.14-135.C.2: Finding 17: The application requests. amendment of the Metro Plan diagram to implement a nodal development overlay for approximately 168 acres. This section of the application narrative addresses the consistency of the amendment with the applicable policies of the Metro Plan, and to demonstrate that adoption of the amendment will not make the Metro Planintemally inconsistent as required by the approval criteria in SDC 5.14-.135.C.2. This narrative only addresses those policies that apply to the proposal, and does. not discuss those portions of the Metro Plan that: (1) apply only to rural or other lands outside of the urban growth boundary; (2) apply to land uses other than the current or proposed designations for the site and will not be affected by the proposed Metro Plan diagram amendment; or (3) clearfy apply only to specific development applications such as site plan review submittals or subdivisions. In many instances the gpals, policies, and implementation measures apply to specific development proposals that will be addressed through compliance with applicable City regulations during site plan review. The Metro Plan Introduction, Section D provides theJollowing definitions: A ooal as abroad statement of philosophy that describes the hopes of the people of the community for the future of the community. A ooal may never be completely attainable, but is used as a point to strive for. An obiective is an attainable target that the community attempts to reach in striving to meet a goal. An obiective may also be considered .as an intermediate point that will help fulfill the overall goaL A Dolicv is a statement adopted as part of the Plan to provide a consistent course of action moving the community towards attain":1entof its goals. Except for the Growth Management Goals, which are addressed below, each of the Metro Plan policies are addressed in the order in which they appear in the Plan Element section of the Plan. Finding 18: Metro Plan Element: Growth Management Policv 1: The urban growth boundary and sequential development shall conUmie to be implemented as an essential means to achieve compact urban growth. Provision of all urban seNices shall be concentrated inside the urban growth boundary. The proposed amendment satisfies this policy because the subject property is inside the UGB and city limits and, as such, encourages compact urban growth. Urban services are available at sufficient. levels to accommodate existing and future development. Implementation of the nodal development overlay will encourage more compact and efficient land development, which is consistent with this policy. Future development within the affected properties will be subject to development review, and any need for increased capacity will be addressed through this process. The City's development review processell ensure that the appropriate level of services is available to serve existing arid future development. Date Received:-4/; /dnf Planner: AL ATTACHMENT 1 - 9 Finding 19: Metro Plan Element: A Residential Land Use and Housing Bement Policv A.11: Generally locate higher density residential development near employment or commercial services, in proximity to major transportation systems or within transportation-efficient nodes. . The subject area contains an existing major employment center (regional hospital facility and medical service buildings). Vacant commercial and mixed use properties within the subject area are expected to generate employment opportunities as these sites develop. Additionally, the subject properties are adjacent to the Gateway area, which is a focal point for employment and commercial activities in north Springfield. The Gateway area; including .the subject site, is served by major transportation connections that"include 1-5, Beltline Road, MLK Jr. ParkWay, RiverBend Drive, and Gateway Street. The residential component of the RiverBend Master Plan area is planned to be medium density housing, with additional opportunities for residential dwelling units in mixed use zones. Higher dwelling unit densities are planned adjacent to the hospital campus, which is consistent with the principles of nodal development and policies listed in the Residential Land Use and Housing Element. As stated previously, the Gateway EmX bus rapid. transit line is currently under construction and is designed to serve the subject site and greater Gateway area of Springfield. There are two transit stops planned to serve the subject area. Provision of a highly efficient transit system that allows users to quickly access nearby commercial and employment centers, downtown Springfield and Eugene, and local educational institutions is consistent with nodal development principles and Metro Plan Policy A.11. Policv A.22: ,Expand opportunities for a mix of uses in newly developing areas and existing neighborhoods through local zoning and development regulations. . The proposed amendment will not change the. underlying commercial, mixed. use, and medium density residential zoning of the subject area. Implementation of nodal development designation discourages low-intensity automobile-oriented uses and, instead, encourages mixed use development and more compact, efficient land development. The proposed amendment is consistent with Policy A.22 of the Metro Plan. . Finding 20: Metro Plan Element: D. Willamette River Greenway, River CofTidors, and WatelWays Element . Policv 0.5: New development that lo~ates along rivet conidorsand wateiways shall be limited to uses that are compatible with the natural, scenic, and environmental qualities of ~hose water features. The proposed amendment should not have an adverse effect on the existing and planned riparian setbacks and conservation areas along the stretch of the McKenzie River that is adjacent to the subject area. Adoption of the RiverBend Master Plan and subsequent development of the subject area with the Sacred Heart Medical Center identified provisions for protecting and enhancing the riparian zone within the subject area. Increased building setbacks, controlled public access (paved pathways), and riparian restoration zones have been used in the subject area tei ensure existing and' . future development is compatible with the river corridor. As new development is proposed along the river corridor, it will be reviewed for conformity with the adopted Master Plan and riparian protection policies and subject to approval by the City. Therefore, the proposed amendment is consistent with Policy 0.5 of the Metro Plan. . Date Received:J~l---- Planner: AL . ATTACHMENT 1 - 10 . Finding 21: Metro Plan Element F. Transportation'Element Land Use Policv F.1: Apply the nodal development strategy in areas. selected by each jurisdiction that have identified potential for this type of transportation-efficient land use pattem. . Land Use Policv F.2: Support application of the nodal development strategy in designated areas through infonnation, technical assistance, or incentives.' . Land Use Policv F.3: Provide for transit-supportive land use pattems .and development, including higher intensity, transit-oriented development along major transit corridors and near transit stations; medium- and high~density residential development within one-quarter mile of transit stations, major transit corridors, employment centers, and downtown areas; and development and redevelopment in designated areas that are or could be well served by existing or planned transit. Land Use Policv F.4: Require improvements tha.t encourage transit, bicycles, and pedestrians in new commercial, public, mixed iJse, and multi-unit residential development. Land Use Policv F.5: Within three years of TransPlan adoption, apply the NO, Nodal Development, designation to areas selected by each jurisdiction, adopt and apply measures to protect designated nodes from incompatible development and adopt a schedule for completion of nodal plans and implementing ordinances. Land Use Policv F.19: Establish aaRT system composed offrequent, fast transit service along major corridors and neighborhood feeder service that connects with the corrid6r service and. with activity centers, if the system is shown to increase transit mode split. along BRT corridors, if local . governments demonstrate support, and if financing for the system is feasible. . The subject area is identified as Site 7B on the 'Potential Nodal Development Areas for the Eugene- Springfield Metro Area" map of TransPlan. By design, nodal development areas encourage pedestrian, bicycle and transit-oriented transportation uses - something that has already occurred on the Sacred Heart Medical Center site with construction of walking paths, bicycle lanes and bike parking areas, and existing and planned transit service. Future miXed use, commerCial, and medium density residential development in the subject area will be required to address these standards. As stated previously, the planned EmX bus rapid transit line will serve the Gateway area includIng the subject site (the EmX Gateway line is projected to start service in 2010). Finally, the City previously adopted amendments to the Metro Plan and the Gateway Refinement Plan in anticipation of nodal development in the subject area. Implementation of the nodal development designation" for the. subject area is consistent with provisions of the adopted TransPlan and, therefore, is consistent with Metro Plan Policies F.1 through F.5 and F.19. .. . Finding 22: Metro Plan Element; G. Public Facilities and Services Element Policv G.1: Extend the minimum level and full range of key urban facilities and services in an orderly and efficient manner consistent with ./he growth management policies in Chapter II-B, relevant policies in this chapter and other Metro Plan policies. . The subject area is located inside the Springfield city limits and the UGB. All necessary infrastructure and key urban facilitieslservices are present to serve existing development or are available to serve .. Date ~eceived: ~) /tltnf Planner: AL ATTACHMENT 1 -11 future development in the subject area in conjunction with site plan review. Therefore, the proposal is consistent with the above policy. . METRO PLAN AMENDMENT CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION Staff finds that the proposed amendment meets the criteria of SDC 5.14-135.C.1 & 2. After review of the adopted City land use plans and studies, evidence provided by staff research, existing uses in the subject area, and the appliCable criteria of approval, staff finds that the. proposed Metro Plan Amendment is appropriate for the subject area. .. Date I~eceived: Planner: AL, ATTACHMENT 1 - 12 6/t/JrnJ'J I I -co :w III ::s- ::s{Jl (1);:D ~.(!l .. () f: ~. ~l( (1) -r- !=!- J~ :h/ fr ....... SPRINGFlE~.D I&: <!:EGON )> -t -t )> n :I: ;;: m Z -t "" .... Subject Area '= . NODAL IMPLEMENTATION FOR . . . PLANNING CASE LMRpC2KENZIE-GATEWAY SITE . 009-00001 Springfield, OR / ,,_________1 , , ~ - ~\ __ ..i ,fJ)< . u no WBf1Bntles thsl B ~::s assume all 18sponsfbi~tycc:mp8ny this product. n ng from any efm I or any loss ar dam of this product r, omission or posilfon81ln .". , a~~q ~ [::.1 City Limits I - - lJG ... _ _ I B ..-... " NORTH . ~. L_~' .L I - J -" j I I :---- , ;L "U..._..___l. --,., Subject Neighborhood '/ f \ / IT'.: I' I /1: II. I Ii I. I I I 1'-, I: Ii ! ;! (--, U . ~ . i r , j" , ,'. ..-!: '~-'T' NODAL IMPLEMENTATION FOR MCKENZlE-GATEWAY SITE PLANNING CASE LRP2009-00001 Springfield, OR " ,,~;1-, ,- " ' o .; IJfTfllH~JlCU'",I._' v ::,', ;1' ; ,~ ~ "T -'-'~..iiu.UDT ..: l J 111111/1 f-r:j H'nuu L U1 , ."~~J ~:;":~',',-,. ~%~ " flll!III)~~ ik.,,,._,j ~EEJ~ ;,~jil},'~:;pRJ,~'~rl ~\' ~ r ifm;:Jift)~~~tf~:~ illIIJ f~' , ,ffi '. '':'3':'. 'r-../:.-tjEiJL..o....;, .N!;I!',llU'.l 8:f .i:~ tl, ; T-._-!~~;;I7'"1JlilW7 1m I ~ '"';0;'. ..,...., .'.7._.7 fl., I)' : i"" '....-.;: r~L...{..LLl:'L':':~-'- "' j i --,"'-- - ., " ,.,1, I' 'I' \ " . f1,~1..'Wf r'---i'1 ~"L_ . '-, '.; f'~ ',:j" . '-' I ; , ~ " -yo ~'.~ . '-- t..( ~=~m..'f\...i i-: ij..;...r. ...... ,~.L;:;I;:'.~,"1--"I:r'1-/ ,.~ \\ , ..,..._..-._..,,-l-..~.___..._.C._..Lj -j I I : ~_;r-,- , ,,'~,/' ~ ;,~,...I..,(~. . , ,:..,;' l~tLr; -;-f:l<:,;~M:~t:ttttllitt:f:t.I-!illLlJ'lr<., ;~!S~jEr:r-:.~1 !;, j',' ,;- h__, U':'1. ; . B' ~t:::p:1..1..L..lL..U...u" --rTT1 W1l.W _ _ ~'...,..":-"""-rf7--~""""i ~)' ~., -~'-- ...l. ," ,.__ 1 1 -\ \.f, 'I L.l..I....L...U I ""7'""1 ~ :,;'.,"' ..:.:[ ," ',.,'j r'.'. . -I \\\~.i'C-"~"l<:"-: 1S;;".c.l;':~!Jtil'IJ1'"";T'j ~-r=~~m~ ,,-, L_:,'f'- '!'. c.., ,\ "'.'"'',',''' '~_L:,' ,..:..0 :'!l-',J.J-'-'.J.'.,j,f", _It f ~~ ~ -~f :'}~/h' -- ir;~~~~l-~ - =.~~.~~~ \'\,<-~~~:.I~;~~::;-;;r: ~~?'~h~j~~l:',~:f:,~gs~i2:-rrf;E~j'l. -1-" J 11\ .JI'~ r~ -Jr':,.-r;...:.....l.1 ,\\ '-(T,:",:r' " , '._1_ 1:< ~~.-ti"j-.-....Lf-l' .'1 ~"'_J~. ~-'"_""i"",~.;-j.:j''''jt.....-~r ;)il;~~~~JJ~'~.~~fiH~~1i~~~i~iS;F"i . .;., :.J~,~'.~::~.~::iY- ,.,.~:,~~j~l;1}T;!';~i;f{.i:~~~R~ut1.it5.r:.~ :. i..:: . "~'~:_',.; .. s ~ E~ There are no ~airan~es that acrompany this product ~. USBfS assume aD msponsibi/ity for MY bss or damage ~ arising from any error, omission or positional inaccuracy ;.iIl_- of this product. OREGON C UGB [~ Outside. of City Umfts . ~ Site Boundary U 'Mthin City Limits o Tax Lots Q l.Doo 2,000 ATTACHMENT 2 - 2 Date.Received:4/~i- Planner: AL NODAL IMPLEMENTATION FOR MCKENZIE-GATEWAY SITE PLANNING CASE lRP2009-00001 Subject Area J'... ,,@, II. I' --.-. - ___11 _ Springfield, OR - ....- .. !Nr"RNAT!PNAt:w...y~== :::::.::::.:.. i I' ) -~~'" ' j ""~'... ! . , "'~...~""'.....' .' I ", f=V' i ty; ( -.....-.-. o 1.000 i I, ;-1 atill/iE ~~l : II I I II ' ii, , rLl -~---. _.,--~:;~-t '.".-., '.'.. -.'-1 I , ,/\.,.-11 I /1111 I '\". ;'" (CARDINAL WAY '> ","),,1111 [I 1 ;~'~'>;('.>-~>-;, y):~ ,</'\ v~ )-, '-" .~. ~ ..'),. "-: A <. /" >~\'X'~.\\v~ X;(">- '<<>> '<,/ . ',- .~~(,?-, <'.):<;, \ \'..zv~'>). "\,,/), ~~ .:\ <'\?"~~;,\;~ ft:~ \oJ H< '111)rm~~\ ~ HI \ I I J 1-...J....cJ;\ ~. \ . . ! I I , 'ffiu/-~~ "I I -~ ~ ~ W-UJJ (i \ " ,/ fJ-1 I I I , _>l \ ,- ~ - I -.,-. \ \ /--.....j, .1 I I I ill lI" 'C..I.J \ ' ~-::-:--=~:.~.-=_:.~~Ir\ ~j V'\~ SP;~N:::E~ There are no warranUes that accompany this product Users assume an responsibility for any /oss 9' damage ~~ arising from any error, omission orpositionaJ inaccuracy "" of /I1is pnxluct. OREGON . -\ \ , \\ \ \ , \ ATTACHMENT 2 - 3 Date Received: ,Planner: AL ,., 6/1/~'1 1/ ' I I . .,-' )I"'I~~~ ..........,...aATltWAy ft....!...... .J..I Ull:.l.to3t"'AlI. .RI.~UJI:u,.&aALsrrJ: CON...,. . uAL ...... ......OPMENT PLAN I I ., ., 1 UGB ~ .--- CAMPUS ~ INDUSTRlAl"'--.) j'jo fa:: >' a:: 0: ~ r ,. ~:'. ~E FAlM HD EAS1 1 :0 , 2DO \0400- 600 BOO 1!?6D. . I . VICINITY MAP Oat" :q~ceived:-tt/~' Planner: AL ATTACHMENT 3 - 1 , . , I . . TO REV'EWrfJ>~8}6~~6~~~~~~EJb~~~ CMO x4666 ONTACT BRENDA JO .. C ORDINANCE NO. Ii 1 nQ (EMERGENCY) . . AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE GATEWA YREFINENEMENT PLAN BY CHANGING APPROXIMATELY 99 ACRES OF MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL PLAN DESIGNATION TO COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL AND MIXED USE PLAN DESIGNATION AT THE GATEWAY MDR SITE AND AMENDING TIlE GATEWAY REFINEMENT PLAN TEXT TO ALLOW IMPLEMENTATION OF TIIE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL AND MIXiID USE DESIGNATIONS WITH Muu:lu USE COMMERCIAL AND MEDICAL SERVICES ZONING DISTRICTS; TO ALLOW FOR TIIE DEVELOPMENT OF A ,>>OSPITAL, ASSOCIATED MEDICAL, OFFICE, RETAIL AND RE:SlUhNTIAL USES; TO PRESERVE THE POTENTIAL FOR NODAL DEVELOPMENT; TO REQUIRE A MASTER PLAN TO BE APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. The City Council of the City of Springfield finds that A. Article 8 of the Springfield Development Code sets forth criteria for .~f...."u....' plan diagram and text amen.:....~u~. B. On April 21, 2003 The Springfield City Council ~l'l'.v..ed Gateway Refinement Plan amendments by adopting ordinance 605L C. The April 2], 2003 Gateway Refinement Plan amendments were appealed to the Land Use Board of Appeals and to the Oregon Court of Appeals. D~ On August 19,2004 the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) remanded the Gateway Refinement Plan amendments to the city for additional findings in respect to Statewide Planning Goal 9 (Economic Deve]opment), Goal 12 (Transportation) and, as instructed by the Court of Appeals, consistency with Metro Plan policies regarding .auxiliary uses in the residential designations. Eo Subsequent to the LUBA remand, the Springfield City Council....vp...,:ed the record on Metro Plan diagram amendment, Journal Number 2002-08-243 and Gateway Refinement Plan amendment, Journal Number 2002-08-244 and initiated amendments to the Springfield Development Code, Journal Number LRP2004-0020 and Springfield Commercial Lands Study, Journal Number LRP2004-002L . F.. Timely and sufficient notice.ofthe public heariiJg, pursuant to Section l4:mO of the Springfield Development Code was provided. G. On November 16, 2004 a public hearing oil the Gateway Refinement Plan amendment was convened and concluded. The record of the proceedings was left open for seven days followed by a seven day period of all participants to submit rebuttal. The applicant was given two additional days for rebuttal. The Development Services staff notes, including criteria of approval, findings, and recommendations, together with the testimony and submittals of those persons testifYing at the heariiJg or in writing, have been considered and are part of the record of the proceeding. Page I of 13 1/10/05 Date Received:~/.,7dDr Planner: . AL ATTACHMENT 4 - 1 , . .' H. On December 9, 2004 the Springfield Planning Commission voted five in favor, one opposed and one abstaining to forward a . ....~=..endation that the City COlmcil approve the Gateway Refinement Plan amendments with conditions. 1. On JanllaI)' 10,2005, the Springfield City Council reOpened the pubic hearing to accept oral argument and deliberate. The City Coimcil voted 5 in favor, 1 opposed and 0 abstaining to approve the Gateway Refinement Plan ordinan,ce and declaring an emergency. J. Evidence exists within the record and the findings attached hereto as Exhibit B that the .proposal meets the requirements of Article 8 of the Springfield Development Code. NOW, lHEREFORE, THE CITY OF.SPRINut' lliLDDOES ORDAIN AS FOllOWS: Section I: The Gateway Refinement Plan is hereby amended to reflect the text changes depicted in Exhibit B;.the Gateway Refinement Plan diagram is hereby' amended to reflect the changes "...in y led by the Council in the concurrent Metro Plan Diagram amendment.. . Section 2: The above findings (A through J), and the findings set forth in EXhibit C attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference are hi:lreby adopted in support of the Gateway Refinement Plan amendments. Section 3: IJbis Ordinance replaces Ordinance 6051, adopted by the City Council on April 21, 2003.- Section 4: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is foc any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, that portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and that holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. Section 5: This Gateway Refinement Plan amendment is subject to the conditions of approval attached hereto in Exhibit A. t. Section 6: It is hereby found and determined that this Gateway Refinement Plan . amendment is a matter affecting the public health, safety and welfare and that an emergency therefore exists and that this ordinance shall take effect immediately upon its passage by the Council and ".....uYal by the MaY9r. ADU.l"LtIU by the Comm9n Council of the City of Springfield by a vote of 5 for and -L against and 0 abstaining on this . 10th day OfJan~ Attest ~ i~2 ~# - MaYOr~ .. . . . . .Jnuu.., City Record ' ----: ~ REVIEWED & APPROVED Date Received: {,.':J#f FO . Planner:. AL Page 2 ot 13 111 0/05 DATE: OFFICE OF CI ORDINANCE NO. 6109 .ATTACHMENT 4 - 2 , ... , \ L.A.l:lJ.JSIT A Conditions of Gateway Refinement Plan Approval (Jo.No.'s 2002-08-244) CO~U1nON 1: Master Plans for property at the McKenzie-Gateway MDR site that propose to employ the Mixed Use Commercial District (MUC) and/or the MedicalServices District (MS) shall include a vehicle trip inonitoring plan as a component of a complete application submittal The approval of the plan shall be a requirement of Master Plan a..... u....L . Trip generation estimates used to create the trip monitoring plan shall be performed using assumptions and methods which are consistent with those employed in the traffic impact analysis submitted to the City of Springfield on October 29, 2.004 in support of Metro Plan and Gateway Refinement Plan amendment applications (City Journal Nnmbers 2oo2-n8-243 & 2002-n8-244) . Traffic generated by land nses within Master PIBn boundaries where the MS and MUC zoning districts are proposed in Phase 1 of the development shall, prior to. 2.01.0, be limited to a maximum of 1,457 PM Peak Honr vehicle trips. BP.gjnning in 2.010 for Phase 2 of the development, such traffic shall be limited to 1,84.0 PM Peak Hour vehicle trips. PM Peak Hour vehicle trips are defined as the total of entering plus exiting trips measured for the PM Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic. Subsequent Site Plan Review applications for sites within the Master Plan boundaries shall be in compliance with the approved trip monitoring plan. . Any proposal that would increase the number of allowable PM Peak-Hour vehicle trips. for the MS and MUC area beyond the above specified limits shall be r-. ......sed as a refinement plan amendment or a zoning map amendment or Master Plan . . approval pursuant to SDC 37.04.0 or Master Plan modification pursuant to SDC 37..04.0 and 37..060(3) and regardless of which type of process is sought, each shall demonstrate compliance with applicable provisions of the Transportation.PllInning Rule for such proposal. CONDmON 2: Prior to occupancy of the first phase of any hospifallocated. at the Gateway MDR site as a~" ." ,eel by a future Master Plan, a portion of TransPlan project 727 (chapter 3, page 31, Dec 2001 adopted version and as adopted by City of Springfield Ordinance No. 599.0, dated September 17, 20.01) shaD be constructed by the applicant. The portion of the project to be constructed by the applicaD.t is conceptually described as roadway and traffic signal improvements at the Pioneer . Pa.~"""J,/OR-U6 Eastbound Ramps to: Page 3 of 13 I11.oIOS Date R6ceived:41 ~1 Planner: AL . ORD~CE NO. 61.09 ATTACHMENT 4 - 3 '0;-- .' 1. Maintain two southbound throllgh lanes on Pioneer Parkway at the OR 126 eastbound ramp terminal :".;._~ection; 2. Provide two southbound left turn lanes on Pioneer Parkway at the OR 126 eastbound ramp terminal intersection; 3. Widen the eastbound on ramp to provide two lanes to accept the two . eastbound turn lanes described above in Number 2. These two on ramp lanes will merge to one lane prior to merging with OR 126 traffic eastbound. 4. Widen the eastbound OR 126 off ramp to three lanes for a minimum distance of 300 feet west .0fPioneer Parkway; and , 5. Any necessary signal modifications to acc:ommod~te Numbers 1-4 above. The funding for these i... ..." 'enients shall come from_PeaceHealth's financial responsibility for off-site transportation improvements as described in the . annexation agreement dated June 4, 2002, Lane County Recorder's number 2002- 043161, between the applicant and the City of Springfield. . To the extent that these funds are determined to be insufficient to perform the above descn1led . imp. u ._~ents, the applicant shaD be responsible for the additional funding needed. Any subsequent Master Plan application for propertr at the GateWay MDR site that proposes to apply the MS and/or MUC zoning district shaD include specific design d... ",:"gs for the above described improvements, which shall be submitted to ODOT . for approval. ODOT approval ofthe proposed design shaD be a condition of Master Plan approvaL CONDmON3 The master plan required by Residential Element Poliey 13.0, by the Annexation Agreement dated May 29lb, 2002, Recorder's R...r ;':on No. 2002-043161, La"ne County Deeds and Records and by the Annexation A".. _.~.ent dated June 7, .~001, Recorder's Reception No. 2001~34714, Lane County Deeds and Records for property owned by Peac:eHealth, a WashingtOli non"Profrt corporation, on the date of Council approval of plan amendments 2002-08-243 and 2002-08"-244 sball inc:lude a hospital as a component of the master plan. Further, the hospital aud other master plan developmeut on the property refereneed in this condition ~haD be phased as. follows: No uses will occur before 200S.Phase 1 will occur between 200Sand 2010 and is Iimited to uses generating no more than 1,457 PM Peak Hour vehic:le trips. Phase 2 will open no earlier than 2010 and/or following construction of the Gateway . StreetlBeltline Road intersection im... _ ,. __ents and will be limited to uses generating no more than 1,840 PM Peak Hour vehic:le trips for aD development on properties redesignated by this ordinance. These phases may occur earlier if needed transportation facilities lire in place or if required mobility standards are lowered, provided mobility standards are maintained. Page 4 of 13 1/10/05 Date Received: 6/!JNf Planner: AL ORDINANCE NO. 6109 ATTACHMENT 4 - 4 Cullu:u~ON 4 In the event that a master plan with a hospital fails to gain approval by the City Council by May 29, 2007 the City Council will initiate amendinents to the Metro Plan and the Gateway Refinement Plan to revise the documellts to adequately plan 'for development of the Gateway MDR site without a hospital. . . CONDmON5 Prior to occupancy ofthe firSt phase of any h."..::.J located at the Gateway MDR ' site as approved by a future Master Plan, the applicant shall constroct a portion of the Beltliile Road/Gateway Street Intersection project, which is a component of . TransPIan Project 606 (chapter 3, page 16, July 2002 adopted version). The portion of the project to ~e constructed by the applicant is a traffic signal at the BeltIine Road /Hutton Road intersection. . CV'lUj~.l.lON 6 Development on property at the McKenzie-Gateway MDR site where the MS and/or MUC zoning district are applied shall be subject to the following condition: Any Subdivision or Site Plan Review application approval that relies upon transportation facility improvements to support the suhject development shall be in compliance with an a~. '" ,eel Master Plan. If the subject transportation. improvements are not open to travel by the motoring public at the time they are needed to support the Subdivision or Site Plan Review development, the .approval shall be subject to the enforcement and revocation proceedings of Springfield Develo~ment Code 1.050(1) and (2). ' Page 5 of 13 1/10/05 Date Received:~~! Planner: AL ~. ORDINANCE NO..6109 ATTACHMENT 4 ~ 5 EXJ:wsIT B Gateway Refinement Plan Text Amendments (Jo.No.'s 2002-08-244) Amend Residential Element Policy and Implementation Action 2: Ensure availability of adequate supplies of land appropriate for low-, rnedium-, and high-density residential development, MtUntein BpprODmately tile etis;':"..t.~"" """,aD!; LDR , .l\mR _d IIDR desi!;llated I&B.d~, e., ,.. ,'" ,:ent with MetFU PI&B. sJI, ~,..~'" ,.. while allowinl! for an annronriate mix of . commercial. emnlovment and residential uses. Amend Rp.;.-!pntia! Element Policy and,Implementation Action 12.0: Allow limited rezoning of land within the "MeKenzie-Gateway MDR site" to Medical Services ("MS") on land desil!nated Community Commercial or Mixed Use on the Metro Plan di8l!J'llm. and rezonin!!!: to Mixed Use Commercial ("MUC") on land desil!nated Mixed Use on the Metro Plan dial!J'8m as imnlemented durin!!!: a Master Plan and or durin!!!: the City's podal imnlementation nroieet. neighborhood ,,,,,.::oereial, in ",.J~.. ~a p.IlBiote Fet.", ~:", _ _d rehabilitation of historie ~,..~..,;..-;,;"~-thtt( -"J'. a'a".,..,~.Je-IJee"",-.. ~,"- ...IInfonning uses, to ~ '" .". ate limited publie or semi.publie aceess to and view of the MeK"",,"~,- :1i\'er, and to BIlow L.. ....'-...~on of seFvices spceifieBlly intended to meet needs of fu.~........ . ....idcnts in this - Amend Resideatial Element Policy and Implementation Action 12.1: Rei!uBing to NC will be BIIewcd for up to.] aeFCS (Total) of",ieant I&B.d within tIlc MeKeuic Cateway MDR Site UDder tIlc folio.. :"g pFU",isi88S: '." , ~ ThL. ....,r '-"~J'. .....,...Jested fO.- ..,",,-,,-~.. .hBIJ.~,,,-~.IIn '8 collector , .. th t' T . .. .-. cd . ... rnn ...lo ..:..1.-&'...___ a IS el ..:.....:..; ,;.:...c...1J".:-Bg8Fplo..aDB ] :...:::l..:,;..l:'iu';.~ for the MeK-eHie Cateway MDR Site, OF tr...,..~ "..,._~:mtIy t ".11.... tile site.. h) Propo~ed !liOU eh_gcs sllBII L '- ......,.,jewed lHIder a TYlle m pl'Bcedl...." :. ".eeordllBce witli Article :3 oCtile SDC lIBd shall be eORSistent l'Iith BII p",,;sioRS of SDC !.i'tiele 12 Zoning Distriet ud <Rerhty Distriet ClIlmges. Page 6 of 13 1/10/05 Date Received: 6j,/drl7 Planner: AL ORDINANCE NO. 6109 ATTACHMENT 4 - 6 e-) This ~l'e off ..." ,,,',, g shall BOt he IIp,FB'l'ed 1UItiI at least ~S . ,_t oftke lIB'~' co".,.,:.] dwelr",:; ",.its-.~~.. .,=If'ueted fhased '" .",,,'eF8!;'e of IS dwelliBg L::"'.. .~- ...Fe). Redesilrnation of a total of 99 acres land within the city limits at the McKenzielGatewav MDR site to Community Commercial and/or Mixed Use throueh the Metro Plan amendment nrocess shall be allowed and shall be imnlemented bv annlication of Mixed Use Commercial ("MUC") or Medical .Services ("MS") zonine district throueh Master Plan aunroval and/or durine the City's nodal imnlementation nroiect. Amend Residential Element Policy and Implementation Action 12.4: NC ascsloe&t.l.,,:;ltiB tke MeKillWe .CBteway MDR Site shall meet tke foDowlne; "'.....,..:..ien.. :.. ~iliJiL_ .:" !:... ",. avbiollS of SDC fade Mt c) Th~ ,."..,~~~,,>c .a>c~B of ooy single NC ase shall Bot eneed 4;000-~"1:,....r..:..-Heetj . . b) . rltFll..:-,:; .......... sholl BOt he yisihle Hom tke McKflIZie RiveF. ,.~_'>... 'H Jshallb. '.. ... .d-f.... ...._L"_ ,c._. H:.JiBom'..H H.."O.:_L ..........l:J....-..... _..._......__... .....,.t'..nJIIt:""............ ................. ~......J:It do..~ ","y'; ,j..JCUril visibility oftkc IlSC; lIBd, c) rublic access to tke MeK".....:.. R.'ycr sball be 'l'8'1'ided by NC Ilses BhuttiBl; tke c':' "c'"' B sethaek. In addition to all annlicable standards and nrovisions rel!11latin~ develonment in Snrimmeld. anY develooment adiacent to the ~cKenzie River or McKenzie River rinarian setback shall nrovide public access to the McKenzie River or McKenzie River rinarian setback. Surface narkin!! areas shall not he visible from the McKenzie RIver corridor and.shall be screened from nublic streets. Add new Residi:ntial Element Policy aiJ.d Implementation Action12.5: MU districts within the McKeDzie-Gatewav MDR Site shall med the nrovisions of SDC Article 400 Add new Residential Element Policy and Implementation Action 12.6: Page 7 of I3 1/1 0105 Within the city limits at the McKenzie-Gatewav MD~ Suharea. the Medical Services ("MS") zoninli district shall imnlement the Community Commercial desimation ifnart of an an_. _ ,. "j Master Plan for deVclooment of a maior medical faciUtv, The adonted Master Plan shall demonstrate that the subiect ntonertv will be able to accommodate the number of housing units within the rau!!e for the MDR land use . desi~.ation in the Metro Plan and Gatewav Refinement Plan. Dato ReceiV~d:.r Planner: AL . ORDINANCE NO. 6109 ATTACHMENT "4 - 7 \ In addition to meetinl!" the standards oCthe SDC. at the time of Master Plan annrovaI. the Citv Council mav attach soeci:fic . conditions on all develonment within the MS or MUC zones ineludinl!" but noi limited to buildinl!" hei!!"ht and setbacks.. , Amend Residential Element Policy and Implementation Action 13.0: A CDP or Master Plan shaD be approved;..under a TypeJI-IV review process, for tile areas lari!er than 5 acres within the citY limits at mapped as the "McKenzie-Gateway MDR Site" on the Refinement Plan diagram. subseauent to annexation and prior to ~.= ,.,,,,,,';":38 IlBd urban development of any portion of tbe-site Master Plan area. . . Delete 13.1 Residential Element Policy and Implementation Action 13.1: The City shoD to.";" F........-...l:..'" ofa CDP by 1."''''',.><,;1 1, 1~92, IlBd shaD-.'ii ii ,,-?,! a CDP 80 later thllB JulS' 1, 1993. ,Io tII~ :.:,...... , a CDP mey he suhmitted by tile iomal developer of a pomon of tile site. }. ~:'J' ;":.;':"':'!d CDP shaD im'olv~ :........~ ITom tile affected pAlpeFty ...J,'~,;,:,,;'.:..,.aBt appF; 'i: l~a.::~.e puhli.. '"-'b';";':"''':u. Amend Residential Element Policy and Implementation Action 13.2: The CDP shall he prepared L;r = ."',,;....., ...",.1 one of tile follOwiog: IlB lIFChiteet, Lo, ~ ""ii ~ ...-.Jkiteet-::, ~ /""""',,,g ...-."....~i8BlIb A Master Plan. for the McKenzie-Gatewav MDR site shall be preoared bv a desim team that shall include.. as determm~ bv, the Direetor. the followinl!" consultants: architect..landscane , ,architect. civil eDlrineer. l!"cotechnical eDlrineer. acoustic eDlrineer. certified arborist. traDSnortation elllrineer and a consultant to address rinarian issues. Amend GRP Residential Element Policy and Implementation Action 13.3: , All development within the McKenzie Gateway MDR Site, shall be consistent with ail approved (;Dp..Master Plan. Aft , appFlI'".'ed CDP mll)' he modified hy the iBitial developel', a suhsequent dC\'eleper, OF tile City, _del' B T}'Pe II review. , pF8eess. " Page 8 of 13 1110/05 . Date Received: ~1/~r Planner: AL ORDINANCE NO~ 6109 ATTACHMENT 4 - 8 Amend Residential Element Policy and Implementation Action 13.4: . The CDP In addition to the reauirements ofSDC Article 37, the Master Plan shaD address, at a minimnm, the foDawing development issnes: a) Preservation and enhancement of natural assets identified in this Refinement Plan; b) Access and.circulation needs; c) Access to arterial and coDector streets; d) Provision of public facilities and services; e) Development needs of future users; f) Lo.....,:,:".., Jf areas llH'geF th..."" ,.., ,.",-" r'-'r:Jsed fOF DuEIillry IISes, iBeludiB.. ,,", .~..M'oF}Jood e" '"'' ",,- aaIt ' fg} Provision of open space areas; and gIl) Public access to the McKenzie River. Amend Residential Element Policy and Implemen~tion Action 13.5: l.'i 'i r c, . JOBS fOF the iBisal CDP ='7 f=.:r sllhstlmsal modifieesoBs to DB appFoved -:;rp In addition to the requirements of SDC Article 37. the initial Master Plan annlication in the McKenzie-Gatewav MDR site shall include a concimtual street man and bicvcle and nedeStrian circulation system nlan for all annexed nronertv in the McKenzie- Gatewav MDR site and shall be exempt from the requirements of Section 3.050(2)(b) ofthe SDC. Delete Residential Element Policy and Implementation Action 13.6:. The COP shaD L .,,,-jisteut with the goals Dud I- di,.:... of the Metre P-IaB. ell of this Refill_eut Plall. Add new Residential Element Policy and Implementation Action 13.6: MaSter Plan annlications for nFOnertv within the McKenzie-Gatewav ,MDR site submitted Drior to the City's comnletion of nodal develonment assessment and imnlementation shall identify all areas within one-auarter mile of nFOnosed transit statiOIl!l as hein!! subiect. to the nrovisions ofthe Nodal Develonment Overlav District (INDO), Anv nFODOsed uses. density and desil!D in the identified nodal develonment area shaD comnIv with the standards of Snrinl!field Develonment Code articles 40 and/or 41 with the followin!! exeention: Uses in the MS and MUC Districts may be exemnted from snec.ific nrovisions of Articles 40 and Articles 41 and residential and l'I'Onn care faciIities in the MDR district mav be exemnted from s~ific provisions of Article 41 if the resnectiVe exemntions are consistent Page 9 of 13 1110/05 . Date Received:-'A/,Mft9 Planner: AL ORDINANCE NO. 6109 ATTACHMENT 4 - 9 . with the Pumose of the Nodal DeveloDmeDt Overlav District and the exemDtions are aDDroved bv the City Conocil as Dart of a master DIan. In the event that the City Conocil determines that nodal develoDment is aDDroDriate for the identified nodal area. the D. _~'._ L.' shaD he re- desit!nated to INDO and aD subseouentland use aDDlications shall comolv with INDO standards contained within articles 40 and/or 41, exceDt as exemDted above. In the event that the City Council, determmes that nodal develoDment is inaDDroDriate for areas identified as such on the master Dlan. those areas shall be changlll! throu!!"h a Tvne II DrocesS to reflect the underlving MS or MUC zonin!!" and anv use. deusitv or desil!D on the master Dlan that does not comDIv to underlving zonin!!" desil!Dation shaD be changed accordin!!"lv. All subseauent land use aODlications.shaD comDIv With the standards reOuired in the nod,.. L:"'!!" zoning district. Add new Residential Element Policy and Implementation Action 13.7: Page]Oof13 1110105 Master Plans for DroDertv at the McKenzie-Gate"Wav MDR site that pron<<:l~e to a!!nlv theMUC and/or MS zoning district Dursuant to Residential Policies and ImDlementation Actions 12_1 and 12.6 shaD be subiect to the followin!!" reauirements: 1. An aDDroved triD monitorinl! olan shall be a reouirement of Master Plan aDDroval. . 2.Tbe trip, mooitorinl! ulan shaD demonstrate comDliance with aD conditions .contained within aDDlicable DIan amendment adoDtion ordinancels). and (.:u ",..~eration estimates shaD be nerformed nsin!!" assnmotions and methods which are consistent with those emDloved in the Dlan amendment traffic imDact analvsis. 3. Traffic penerated bv land uses within the Master Plan boundari~ where the MS and MUC zoninl! districts that are proDOSed in Phase 1 of the DeveloDment ~haD. nrior to 2010. he limited to a maximum of 1.457 vehicle trios. Bel!inninl!. in 2010 for Phase 2 of the DeveloDment. traffic l!enerated from site develonment within the subiect districts shaD be limited to 1.840 PM Peak-Hour vehicle triDS. Vehicle triDS are defined as the total of enterint>" Dlus exitin," trill' as estimated or measured for the PM Peak Hont o( AdiaO:"'!t ~treet Traffic. This trio monitorint>" Dlan limits aDowed land uses to be consistent with the olanned function. caDacitv and Derformance standards of affected transDortation facilities., 4. Subseauent Site Plan Review anDlications for sites within the Master Plan bonodaries shall be in comDIiance with the aDnroved triD monitorin!!" Dlan. Date Received:' ~//,?tH? Planner: AL ORDINANCE NO. 6109 ATTACHMENT 4 :... 10 5. Anv DroDosal that would incnase the number of aDowable PM Peak-Hour vehicle triDs for the MS andMUC area beyond the . liniits sDecified in section 3 above shaD be nroccssed as a refinement Dlan amendment. a zoninl!: maD amendment or Master Plan aooroval DDrSuant to SDC 37.040 or modification DursUant to SDe 37.040 and 37.060(3) and regardless of which tvoe of process is sou!!ht. eacb shaD demonstrate comoliance with aoolicable orovisions of the Transnortation Plannin!! Rnle for such nrooosaL Delete Residential Element Policy and Implementation Action. 14.0 through 14.8 (no . change since April 21, 2003 Council approval): 140 'I) -.'\.. t" PIBB(IHP).1t&1I1l ,..-...J d ,. . . ...... el_....,.",28...1.:f'e8 ... s e..,~~.,.._,BB era T)'JIe II ,....,'.:_.... ...-..._.;, priOF to dll'"1 J:;c" .<e,'; appFUVal f",. "''',J' .p,':c~',o". of the OF' , ="......_J as the "j\'leKellil!ie CatewayMDR.8ite" OD the R-efiDement Plan Dia..," _.91, ed shall But h" '-rrC"w..iI '-".tL...-iHs t.......;:,~eBt with ..'....'-rr..",'d-~r. The intent oCtbe nAP is te pFllvide FeSBl...,;.;..... ...1-si,;;, ".~ -! ,,,j deveL r'''' "'" ,'.'lsues at a seale and level of speeificity that aF... ;..j,.....~...~..~,e to the CDP and Site PJan IC'l'e1s. .Yl DAP's shall coBfoflll te the follewiBg FelluiFemcDts: 14.1 DAI"s shall address the full_in:; development issues, at a mIRlmum.: it) . r;:ll,isioB of ad.............~:.L .."-..,:1oD fUF the Dev.L r 'co .".; Area )HId it. ..Jj"~6 ..~8perties, ineludin:; dcdi~atioD of right uf way feF future stFcea aDd pathways sh,.",." ,.,.-the-"'..r'....'..,J CDP; l>) r.lYlisiuu of eoordinded eIteBsioD of puhlie faeilities to sern the site ed Sl ,"-, . ",<e,Jm:; pr.... ..'~:JlS; ed e)--,L " 'c f . AlBOD, tu th" ="",:" ,,"" -..."';...., praetieahle, uf DatuFBl s.,.....~ ;S,.".;:! ,d in this ReL."",." t PIau, ed on !L, "'rrc.,.:cd CUP. 14.2 D..\P's .shall incl1uh ~t: fuJluwin.:;. infoflllatiou, at ami,:, 0;";; ,. All signifieant site fe&tuFes, ineludin:; dFllinageways, ~:"::'~:"g ver;etatiou, _II d~...-:...~t:.:,';.i' asset!l a. :L....-:,:ned in this R.3;., .,0 .ent PIBBt PFepused hooding f, ,/:... ,4'" ,tst PFupused upen .r'"~.. '-,....j lBBds''-'r d, '--JlIISt . . EBgi..,._...:...., .;tudies.uL"",. :"lIl.eutified L"':""-,,.llr--"Flb, =..;;_, fef' developmeut within the HIO yeaI' :fIuodplain; Pl'8posed aecess aBd eiFeulatiUB, including roads, dm'es, r"" ,-I,C".8., ...-.~., aDd hie}'ele .ed II "il.....;...,:...... ....JI.."",.,3; ell all otherpFOplised laud uses. 14.3 If tile D.\P eOIBJlIL.. '1":.lJ. all Site P.JaB R",:.,,, 3tBBdards of tile SDC,sl.L .,; ~,",,{. r "..:......~!ted uses that e "Jt ',,",. to the D.\P shall Bot FefJuiFe additional site plltD review. (This implementatioB.,..;:...:, intended to simplify the developmen}, 'r r' :al pFoeess fur IBfl:e, Page II of 13 1/10/05 Date, f,(6ceived:-44/Jdt11 Planner: AL . ORDINANCE NO. 6109 ATTACHMENT 4 -11 , ~ pllMed devel, ".'" '" .03 by aIlewmg a stdlieiently detailed DAP to meet hotll D, \J> ed' Site PIe '" "i Ace. ''', ""..J,) H.4 D,\J>'s sllall t , "".Hst,,,.,,.,,:,,:. tile appruved CDP,.aad witII tile pulieies ufike MetFu Plaa ed uftllis Re'L 'co "" PIeB. ' 11.5 Site PIes for pumuas ufa deveL"",.,,;.t area ghltlJ eeul.,""....,,~tIi e appreved R\J>, pFevide&, huwever, tllet the D,\J> may he mudified ~.. r "c"~:~.ed ill impl "',. "." IIii6D aeDun 11.6. 11.6 Ssh.L';"-t>...1 mudifieaBulI5 ufD,\J>'s shall he reviewed UDder Type n pneedllre, ill aeeoMeee with ""mele 3. uf tile SDG 14.7 Tile mi "';".,,,, Dll'\'elopmeat .\rea for MDR deL",;;,.,",l-tlc~" ~Iull he 5 aet'es. . H.8 The miBim_ s~ fOF Devel, ,,'" '" .I-I.~-..... =",-,,-be redlleed, if appFfWed hy the Dev L".'" ",.; Serviees DiRetul', HHa r. ,.: J, ,.,J! iBstaBee~ where insuflieient ",aeet IlIIId, o."",...h.:" pattems, lot eoafigu.fllBUn, I.c' "'h......:1iBg al5tiBg 1I9es prehihit eUBSolitlauuB uf plH'eels to aeliieve a S acre J)ffeJ,,, "'" J 1'.Fea. . Amend Residential Element ~olicy and Implementation Action 15.1: Development density may be transferred from natural assets and recreational pathways identified in the Natnrill Assets, .open Space/Scenic Areas, and Recreation Element. or from proposed shared open spaces, to bnildable portions of the development area, provided that the gross density of the development area does not exceed 29 duJa, IIIId.the ".'~ 11.......:1y on the hllildttbl.. po"'<;an due. ......: .",~~...J 25 dula the maximnm.. .densitv oermitted in the nnderlvine: zone. Add new Residential Element Policy and ImplementationAction 19.0: Densitv bonuses allowed under Residential Element Imnlementation Actions 15.1 and 16.3 mavbe aUowed consistent with an aooroved Master Plan nursuant to SDC Article 37 within the McKenzie-Gatewav MDR Site. . Amend Commercial Element Policy and Implementation Action5.0 (revised since April 21, 2003 Council approval): . Provide for future .aoorooriatelv olanned Mixed Use. Communitv Commercial and nodal development desimated areas Beij:hhumuud .. ~ ~.:.:.c., .;.:.,- ...:.J...tIeft: l 'i: Ie:. ..:: I': iu the ~(edieBl' DeltSH}p Residential development _."._ __st of Game Farm Road, within the City Limits at Page 12 ofB 1/10105 Date Received: 6,~/JUo' Planner:AL . . ORDINANCE NO. 6109 ATTACHMENT 4 - 12 . , the McKenzie-Gateway MDR site as identified in T~sPIan as potential nodal develonment sites, Amend Commercial Element Policy and Implementation Action 5.1: , No mOR thuR J seRS of NC uses ellB be ZORed lIS psrt Ilf the Medium Deusit). F"..",.: "",juJ IIRU. This 1',.....'..;,..1; shlllI Rot 1. ".a:co.l'ed uBtil ut. lellst 2S peReBt of the sRtieipsted totul dweIliBg lHiit5 iB the neB IIR eoli5fto,;..;.t.;.lI. The Beij;hborhood """..",,,, ~iul SFell shsn he sited iB s loeu80B thst pl'eseBted the leust ;'-..JlL, Roise, IIBd IigL'" '';; "" 1Iiets with IIdjseCB. .. ...:':':Btisl uses. (PFeil.....;,;.. :....~Rtoried iB the Historic ~..'.:.:.-....~ Elem.eot fU ~~"-~"'':'''-!es .B). he re5EsBed .8 NC ad . DFe-"'-""';r~ fFom.this IlFovisioB.) Rezoninl!" orland within the citv limits at the McKenzie-Gateway MDR site to Mixed Use Commercial .c"MUC") and Medical Services ("MS") shall he allowed to imnlement the Mixed Use and/or Community Commercial nlan desi!!JIations., Zone chanl!"es shall demonstrate the ability to meet the demand for commercial lands identified in the S]!rinmeld Commercial Lands Study (SCLSI noliev I-B. Commercial uses allowed in zonin!! districts pursuant to GRP Poliev 5.0 above shall be subiect to Master Plan annroval and shall be nlanned in a manner to minimize traffic. noise., and Iil!"htinl! conflicts with adiacent residential uses. Amend Tran.:..IM~On Element Policy and Implementation Action 13.0: Future transportation system development in the McKenzie-Gateway Campus Industrial and the 180 acre MDR sites should occur as needed in conjUnction with CI and MDR, MUC and MS development. Amend Public Facilities Element Policy and Implementation Action 2.2: Require the consideration of the use of storm drainage facili~es that store and retain runoff in the- McKenzie-Gateway .Campus IDdwtrial site, and within the citv Iimits in the", co" ,Jed l\mR ares esst of Csme Farm Rosd South' McKenzie-Gatewav MDR Site. Require the consideration of the use and enhancement of natural storm water drainage features as part of the overan storm water systems in those areas. Page 13 of 13 1/10/05 Dat~ Received: '/:/)tn>f Planner: AL ORDINANCE NO. 6109. ATTACHMENT 4 ~ 13 ""00 -Ill Ill_ :::J{\l ~~ :"1(1) .0 'J> ffi. r< CD c. I ~ ~ ~ I ! :t:' >-:3 >-:3 :t:' n ::r:: ~ t<:J Z >-:3 / Legend Potential Nodal Development Areas for the Eugene-Springfield Metro Area !illffiID Nodal Development Are8s ,'\.,1 Urban Growth Boundary Amaaldantllied n nlldal dBVtllopmant ara.. .....Donsldared to hllVIIpalantlalfor thlltype of land uSDpaltam. Other IrlIlIlIlKJldealgnaladlornodaldavlllopmllntmavalaobe found to hlMl potential for nodal dllVolopmanl. lJ1 I I-' Note: This map Is illustrative llod should be m;ed fOf referencllonly. The fI'lllpdepicts IlpproxlfNlte loclltlons 01 existingllndpropo5eUpubllcfllciUtie5Ilndllu'lduses. \ From: MOTT Gregory Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 9:48 AM To: LIMBIRD Andrew .Subject: : FW: Springfield PAPA 001~09: Amending Gateway Refinement Plan .Andy, Go ahead and place the email train from Ed into the record. Wherever your staff report mentions correspondence or comments from the pUblic and interested parties be sure and identify that DLCD reviewed this proposal and had no comments. gmott From: Ed Moore [mailto:ed.w.moore@state.or.us] Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 9:40 AM To: MOTT Gregory; MOORE Ed W (OR) Cc:. LIMBIRD Andrew Subject: RE: Springfield PAPA 001-09: Amending Gateway Refinement Plan Greg, your correct, Gloria's cozriments are . directed at Exhibit B. Given your clarification, we have no comments on the proposed PAPA. Cheers, Ed Ed Moore AICP So Willamette Valley Regional Representative DLCD Springfield Office 644 A Street . Springfield, OR 97478 971.239.9453 ed.w.moore@state.or.us www.oregon.gov/LCD >>> On 2009.03.23 at 15:47, in message <C1E1D2BFDOE40040BA644474C38411A6D5AOB78801@spifs030.Springfield1.net>, MOTT. Gregory.<gmott@ci.springfield.or.us> wrote:. Ed, Thanks for the opportunity to review Gloria's comments. I'm assuming her comments are directed at Exhibit B in our notice .of proposed amendment. That exhibit is an. ordinance adopted by Council in 2005 as part of a remand ordered by LUBA on a proposal to amend the Gateway Refinement Plan to allow the .development of the RiverBend campus. We're not proposing to change any of that ordinance; we provided it as context to the one policy in that document that requires this site to. be redesignated. for nodal development. We are not ATTACHMENT 6 - 1 DatEl Received: Plamler: AL ~ It h'l , I \ proposing to change the distribution of the underlying zoning nor are we proposing to change the permitted uses except to prohibit some commercial activities that are currently permitted. but will be prohibited upon redesignation as nodal overlay. Thanks again. Greg Matt From: Ed Moore [mailto:ed.w.moore@state.or.us] Sent: Monday, . March 23, 2009 10:31 AM To: MOTT Gregory Subject: Fwd: Springfield PAPA 001:-09: Amending Gateway Refinement Plan Greg, As we discussed, let me know if you would like me to submit these suggestions as part of the official record. don't see any of them as deal stoppers; but per our no. surprises agreement and given the late date that I received them I don't feel the need to submit t.hem if they would delay your adoption, Ed Ed Moore AICP SO'Willamette Valley Regional Representative OLCO Springfield Office 644 A Street J Springfield, OR 97478 971.239.9453 ed"w.moore@state.or.us<mailto:ed.w.moore@state.or.us> www.oregon.goviLCO<http://www.oregon.gov/LCO> >>> On 2009.03.20 at . <49C38B8A. 6954. OOFC.O@lcd.state.or.us>, Gardiner wrote, Hi, Ed. Sorry my comments are so late. 12:26, Gloria in message Monday 3/23 is the fax deadline. My comments are on the amendments in Exhibit B. deletion;.a suggested addition is in bold. ] . is a . suggested Residential Element Policy and Implementation Actions Action 2.: I recommend revising as. follows to ensure consistency with Goal 10:Housing, OAR 660, division 8, and the needed housing statutes in ORS chapter 197: "Ensure availability of [adequate] needed supplies of land for 10w-, medium-, and high- ATTACHMENT 6 - 2 Date~eceived : Plann~r: ..AL 6/J~7 J I .~~ I / "Adequate" is too vague and undefined. This policy should be clearly consistent with Springfield's obligation to ensure a. supply, of land in the UGB to meet the housing needs of all of its residents according to its housing land needs analysis. density residential development while allowing for an appropriate mix of commercial, employment and residential uses." Action' 12.6: I recommend revising the .1ast sentence as follows for consistency with the Goal 10:Housing, OAR '660, division ,8, and the needed housing statutes in ORS chapter 197: "In addition to meeting the standards of .the SDC, at the time of Master Plan approval, the City Council may attach specific conditions on all development within the MS or MUC zones including but not limited to building height and, setbacks. The standards, conditions, and procedure for needed housing shall .be clear and objective and shall not have the effect, either alone or cumulatively, of discouraging' needed housing through unreasonable cost or delay. " This policy should make clear tha~ there is a limit on the standards and conditions that City Council may impose on approval of needed housing in this plan area.' As written, it suggests that the city may use any standards and impose any conditions on,needed housing , ,development. Action 15.1: As drafted, this "density transfer" provision decreases residential density on development sites .that contain natural resources or open space.. The policy provides that housing units may be moved from unbuildab1e Goal 5 resource areas, recreatj,ona1 . pathways , or shared open space, to buildable' areas. of the devel~pment, at the same maximum density as the base zone. However, unless the city re-zones more land in the development area'to residential, there is no place to put the transferred . units; the buildable. . part of the site.can currently be developed up to the maximum density for the base zone. The only way to truly transfer density from one part of a site to another is to take. the calculated number' of units for the unbuildable area' and transfer them to the buildable area; ATTACHMENT 6 - 3 Date. Received:.? Planl)er: AL . .~ which means allowing a higher density in the buildable flortion site (i.e., clustering the allowed housing on the buildable portion of the site and preservi g the unbuildable .. ~ portions .from .development), so that the site's overall density doesn't fall below the base zone standard. This is what some .cities' PUD regulations do. Gloria Gardiner I Urban Planning Specialist Planning Services Division Oregon Dept. of Land Conservation and Development 635 Capitol Street NE, Suite 150 I Salem, OR.97301~2540 Office: (503) 373-0050 ext. 282 I Fax: (503) 378-5518 gloria.gardiner@state.or.us<mailto:gloria.gardiner@state.or.us> www.oregon.gov/LCD<http://www.or~gon.gov/LCD> Date Received: ~/~L_ P.lanner: AL ATTACHMENT 6 - 4 <~. From: Bonnie Ullmann [ullmann@uoneuro.uoregoh.edu] Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 11:48 AM To: LIMBIRD Andrew Subject: Planning Case LRP 2009-00001 Dear Mr. Limbird and members of the Planning Commission and City Council, I. would like to lend my support to implementing a Nodal Development Overlay District for any portions of the Gateway Refinement Plan area. In particular, at this time, I support the overlay on the southern portion of the. 'PeaceHealth ~roperty. My reasoning for support of this planning designation is that I .believe it' will lend a more viable commercial and residential area in the long run. It will benefit the Game Farm Neighbors area by implementing design . standards for commercial land. .This will improve the overall liveability of the Game Farm area by addressing traffic issues and community cohesiveness. An attractive and viable development plan will go a ways toward compensation of the Game .Farm neighborhood for the great increase in population, traffic and decreased attractiveness. of . our properties since the boom in development interests in our home area. I have been educating' myself by' having participated in Springfield . citizen planning committees that addressed the idea of nodal development in our neighborhood. I believe nodal development to be a tremendous strategy for long-term, far-reaching good planning that ultimately will be beneficial to. the Game Farm Neighbors area. I sincerely.believe that the long term residents of. the area should have the. advantage of city planning that demonstrates foresight at this point in time. Springfield's commitment to nodal development is very encouraging and I am . fully behind the concept. Please let me know if I can help in the process. Please add my support to the written record for the public hearing. Sincerely, BOlmie Ullmann Bonnie Ullmann ullmann@uoneuro.uoregon.edu Date Received: ',f;/,}r/l1' Planner: AL ATTACHMENT 6 - 5 3350 Oriole Street Springfield, OR 97477-7551 USA. 541-520-0921 Mobile 541-747-7580 Message/home 541-747-7580 FAX 541-346-4506 Work , ATTACHMENT 6 - 6 ., i~ ') Date Received: 6A~9 Planner: AL . RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMiSsION OF THE CITY OF SPRINGFlEI"P . .~ .....:... METRO PLAN DIAGRAM AMENDMENT IMPLEMENTATION OF NODAL DESIGNATION RECOMMENDATION TO lliE CITY COUNCIL Case Number: lRP2009-00001 ( ( ( ( ( NATURE OF THE APPLICATION . The proposed Metro Plan amendment will implement a Nodal Development Overlay Disbict (NDO) designation for approximately 170 acres of the Riverbend area of northwest Springfield, which includes the existing Sacred Heart Medical Center and campus. The NDO d~ignation will be supplementary to the current Commercial; mixed use, and medium density residential zoning for the subject area. 1. The above referenced plan amendment action was initiated by the City Council upon adoption of the amended River8end Master Plan in June, 2006. Timely and sufficient notice of the public hearing, pursuant to Springfield Development Code Section ~.2-115, has been provided. 2. The plan amendment action is consistent with provisions of the adopted Metro Plan, TransPlan and Gateway Refinement Plan as described in the attached staff report. . 3.. On Apn121, 2009, the Planning Commission held a public hearing regarding the proposed plan amendment The Development Services. Department staff notes and recommendation together with the oral testimony and written submittals of the persons testifying at that hearing have been considered and are part of the record of this proceeding. 4. On the basis of testimony submitted at the April 21, 2009 Planning Commission public hearing, the Planning Commission recommends that upon subsequent requests for annexation of remaining property in . the McKenzie-Gateway MDR site, the City will initiate the .amendment process for noelal development . consistent with RiverBend Master Plan Condition #12. CONCLUSION . On the basis of this record, the t" ~t'....ecI amendment is consistent with the criteria of SDC Section 5.14- 135.C.1 &2. This general finding is supported by the specific findings of fact and conclusion in the staff Report anll Findings. . RECOMMENDATION . The Planning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council to approve the plan amendment as ~moOOod_,ea.'NwnbBa7""~~"9' , I """"9~ Cho;_ ATTEST: AYES: . NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: B f"2 :J.. () Date Received: .6!/;jo-o1 Planner: AL . Page 1 oft PlaM;ng Commission otrJer 1RP2CJ09.<<irxu April n. 2009 . ATTAr.I-IMFIIIT 7 - 1 ORDINANCE NO. (General) AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD METROPOLITAN AREA GENERAL PLAN (METRO PLAN) DIAGRAM BY ADOPTING A NODAL . DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DESIGNATION FOR APPROXIMATELY 168 ACRES OF LAND '" nHlN THE MCKENZIE-GATEWAY MDR SITE. THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD FINDS THAT: . WHEREAS, Section 5.14--100 of the Springfield Development Code (SDC) sets forth procedures for.Metro Plan diagram amendments; and WHEREAS, SDC Subsection 5.l4--l20.B.1 states: "The City Council may initiate a Type I or Type II Metro Plan amendment at anytime. Consideration of this type of amendmeni shall begin immediately thereafter. ,. "; and . WHEREAS, the Springfield Common. Council adopted the amended RiverBend Master Plan in June, 2006; and WHEREAS, Condition #12 of the adopted RiverBend Master Plan approval states: "The City Council hereby initiates the application of the Nodal Overlay Plan Designation at the entirety of the McKenzie Gateway MDR Site asidentified in the Gateway Refinement Plan"; and WHEREAS, the subject area is depicted as Potential Nodal Development Area 7B on the adopted Eugene-Springfield Transportation System Plan (TransPlan); and . WHEREAS, timely and sufficient notice of the public hearing on this Ordinance has been provided in accordance with SDC 5.2-115; .and WHEREAS, on Apri12l 51, 2009 the Planning Comniission held a public hearing on the plan amendment request. The Development Services Department staffriotesincluding the criteria of approval, findings and recommendations, together with the testimony and submittals of the persons testifying at that hearing were considered and were part of the record of the proceeding. After considering the record, the Planning Comniission deliberatecr and voted 5 in favor, 0 opposed, and 2 abserit to fOIWard a recommendation of approval to the Common . Council; and WHEREAS, o~ May l8.'h; 2009 the Springfield Common Council conducted a public hearing to receive testimony and hear comments on this proposal. The Common Council is now ready to take action on this proposal based upon the above recommendations and the evidence and testimony already in the record, as well as the evidence and testimony presented at this public hearing held in the matter of adopting this Ordinance amending the Metro Plan diagram. Date ~eceived: ~!t / ~f Planner: AL ATTACHMENT 8 - 1 ~ . NOW, THEREFORE, the Common Council of the City of Springfield does ordain as follows: Section 1: The abov.e fmdings are hereby adopted ~ findings in support of this Ordinance. ' . Section 2: The Nodal Development Overlay Designation is hereby adopted and applied to the subject properties within the McKenzie-Gateway MDR Site that are inside the current Springfield city limits. The subject properties are more particularly depicted and described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Section 3: Upon requests for annexation of remaining property in the McKenzie- Gateway MDR site, the City Council shall consider initiating the Metro Plan amendment process for nodal development on a site-specific basis consistent with RiverBend Master Plan Approval Condition #12. Section 4: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate. distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not af~ect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Section 5: Notwithstanding the effective date of ordinances as provided by Section 2.110 of the Springfield Municipal Code 1997, this Ordinance shall become effective 30 days from the date of its passage by the City Council and approval by the Mayor, or upon the date of its acimowledgement as provided by ORS 197.625, whichever. date is later. . Adopted by the Common Council of the City of Springfield this 2009 bya vote of in favor and against. day of Approved by the Mayor of the City of Springfield this day of ,2009 Mayor ATTEST: City Recorder ~!EVIEWUJ ~! ilPPl10YED ,\~~~-~~~ ~ \ ~,... . l)f\TE:_5] 1\\ I:l"l.. i['<...;1\1. COU~ISEI. Date Received: tl/(JrI1lj Planner: AL ATTACHMENT 8 - 2