HomeMy WebLinkAboutNotes, Work PLANNER 10/24/2006
-. . ~';'I ~
TYPE'II TENTATIVt'SITE PLAN REVIEW,
PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
Project Name:' Larkin/Nasalroad Townhouses
Project Proposal: Four multi-family buildjngs - 18' units
Case Number: Pre2006-00089
Project Address: 327 South 42nd Street
, \
ft~,
SPRINGFIELD
Assessors Map and Tax Lot Number(s}: 17-02-32-33 TL 1701
Zoning:. MDR
Applicable Refinement Plan: East Main
Refi~ement Plan Designation: MDR
Pre~Submittal Meeting Date: October 24, 2006
Application Submittal Deadline: April 24, 2007 .
Associated Applications:
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TEAM
I POSITION
I Proiect Manaqer
I Transportation Planninq Enqineer
Public Works Civil Enqineer
. I Public Works EIT
I Deputy Fire Marshall
I Community Services Manaqer
, REVIEW OF
Planninq
Transportation
Utilities
Sanitary & Storm Sewer
Fire and Life Safetv
Buildinq
APPLICANT'S DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TEAM
PRE.SUBMITTAL REC'D
IO-:l~;:;o,0, '
NAME
Linda Paulv
Garv McKenney
Matt Stouder
.Matt Stouder
Gilbert Gordon
Dave Puent
Applicant
Greg LarkinjTim Nasaroad ,
41892 N. River Drive
Sweet Home, OR 97386
Architect
Artemio Paz Jr.
86950 Cedar Flat-
Sprinqfield, OR 97478 .
10/23/06
PHONE
726-4608
726-4585
736-1035
736-1035
726-2293
726-3668
t1
"SITE"~LAN REVIEW APPLICATION
PR.E-SUBMiTTAL CHECKLIST
PLANNING
,f=CEIVED
,~r.sUBMITTAL REC'O '
, I o.~i-Jc~~~
By:
o Application Fee discuss the applicable fees
o One additional copy of the Site Plan reduced to 8'h"x 11"
Complete Incomplete, See
Notes
~
8 '12" x 11" Copy of Site Plan
,0 Copy of the deed and a preliminary title report issued within the past 60 days
documenting ownership and listing all encumbrances. If the applicant is not the property
owner, written permission from the property' owner is required.
Complete Incomplete
Ri1
l.2J
o Site Plan
'Complete In'complete See
Notes
.I 0/23/06
f!!ID
f!!ID
f!!ID
, m+1,--'
IEdID '..
lfil'
L?E!:.J
f!!ID
f!!ID
f!!ID,'
f!!ID
Deed and Preliminary Title Report
Prepared by an Oregon LJcerJsed Architect,
Landscape Architect or Engineer
Proposed buildings: location, dimensions, size
(gross floor area applicable to the parking'
,requirement for the proposed use(s)), setbacks
from property lines, distance between buildings
Location and height of existing or proposed fences,
outdoor 'equipment, storage, trash receptacles, and
signs
Location, dimensions and number of typical, , '
compact and dIsabled parking spaces; including
aisles;wheel bumpers" directional signs and striping
Lot coverage calculations of all parking and
vehicular areas
On-site loading areas and vehicular and pedestrian
circulation
, Location of oncsite exterior lighting,
,Location, type and number of bicycle parking spaces
Location of existing and proposed transit facilities
2
'~
Phased r;evelopm~t Where applicable, the Site Plan application must include a
phasing plan indicating any proposed phases for development, including the, boundaries
, and sequencing of each phase. Phasing must progress in a sequence promoting street
connectivity between the various phases of the development and accommodating other
required public improvements, including but not limited to sanitary sewer, storm water
management, water and electricity. The applicant must indicate which phases apply to
the Site Plan application being submitted. "
Complete Incomplete See
Notes
~
o Landscape Plan
Complete Incomplete
.see
Notes
~,.~
!'.,.",~""'0""
. "..' "':.CW"
Ril..,..,
~
riFt
~
~
~
.~
Phased Development Plan
- .
Location and dimensions of landscaping and open
space areas to include calculation of landscape'
coverage .
Vegetative screening in accordance with SDC
Section 31.160
Written description, including specifications of the
permanent irrigation system
Location and type of street trees
List. in Chart form the proposed types of landscape
materials (trees, shrubs, ground cover). Include in
the chart genus, species, common name, quantity,
size, spacing ahd method of planting
,Notes:, '
Any outdoor equipment?
Need 2A'-wide driveway access according to Article 32.
An Area of Illumination planis required.
Irrigation system specifics will be required for final site plan.
An detailed narrative is requir.ed describing how the plan meets the Multi.Unit Design
Standards in SDC 16.110. Please pay particular attention to Building Form and Open Space.
"The Landscaped/open space calculations on A1,are not clear what areas they apply to.
Number of bike parking proposed?
In the Zone of Contribution of the Maia Wellhead.
Existing Condi~ions (;;;ite assessment) sheet required.
,Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application:'
10/23/06
.,"
PRE.SUBMllTAl REC'O
_ }O;~,2.~-OhA,M,
3
,PetG2t>t>r,-OOOe.'9) L./IE,kIAl- $freJ;:%.AN ,
/d/~;{~E 'ptA~r~r~fw APPLICATION
PRE':'SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
TRANSPORTATION
N. ~'Ri9ht-of-Way APproa'ch Permit application must be provided where the property h~S
/'" frontage on an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) facility.
Complete Incomplete' See
Notes
~' fijI , ~ Copy of ROW approach Permit Application'
N' '~Traffic Impact Study-,four copies of a study prepared by a Traffic Engineer in '
"/' , accordance with SDC Section 32.020(1)(c). Traffic Impact Studies (TIA) allow the City
, to analyze and evaluate the traffic impacts and mitigation of a development on the
City's transportation sy~te~. In general, 'a TIA must explain how the traffic from a
given development affects the transportation system in terms of safety, traffic'
operations, access and mobility, and immediate and adjoining street systems. A TIA
must also address,if needed, City, metro plan and state land use and transportation
policies and objectives.
Complete Incomplete See
Notes
~ liI II
","'", -
0 Site Plan
CompletE! Incomplete 'See
Notes
~ !11 fjJ
Traffic Impact Study
Access to streets, alleys and properties to be served,
including the location and dimensions of existing and
proposed curb cuts and curb, cuts proposed to be '
closed '
o Improvement and Public Utilities Plan
PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'O
,I O:-1.~~,-:l00
Complete' Incomplete
See
Notes
~.
~
@fI
(jJ
151
~
I'iiffil
"~_.
Il
"-"A," ,
~
f!i
~
I!!J,
7121/04
LocatioI') and type of existing and proposed street
lighting ,
Location, widths and names of all existing and
proposed streets, alleys, dedications or other right-of-
ways within or adjacent to the proposed development
Location of existing and required traffic control devices
4
, '
"SiTE~LAN REVIEW APPlicATION
PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING
o Site Assessment of Existing Conditions
Complete Incomplete
10/23/06:
Ri1
~
See
Notes'
~'44'~~~
"""",q~~",
0=),fuP~9:;;
Ri1
~
I":Xl
l:1:]
Ri1
~
'~
~
~, '
~
.~
PRE-SUBM!ITAt REC'D
lD.-:lY.:"'O'€:> '
Prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect
or Engineer ..
'Vicinity Map
The name, location and dimensions of all existing
site features including buildings, curb cuts, trees
and imperviou~ surface areas, clearly indicating
what is remaining and whatis'being removed
Required ?etbacks to the proposed new property
lines for existing structures to remain on site
The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow
and top of bank of all watercourses and required
riparian setback that are shown on the Water
, Quality Limited Watercourse Map on file in the
'Development Services Department
The 100-yearfloodplain and floodway boundaries on
the.site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA
Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter,
of Map Amendment or Letter of Map Revision
The Tirn~ of Travel Zones, as specified in Article 17
of the Spr'ingfield Development Code and delineated
on the Wellhead 'Protection Areas Map on file in the
Development Services Department
Physical features including, but not limited to trees
5" in diameter or greater when measured 4' V2 feet' '
above the ground, significant clusters of trees and
shrubs, riparian areas, wetlands and rock "
outcroppings
Soil types and water table information as mapped
and specified in the Soils Survey of Lane County. A
Geotechnical Report,prepared by an Engineer must
be submitted concurrently if the Soils Survey ,
indicates the proposed development area has
unstable soils and/or a high water table
6
.,
o Improvement and Public Utilities Plan must be in compliance with the regulations of
SDC Articles 31 and 32 and must include the following information:
,Compiete, Incomplete
'Ri1
EI
~-~"
Ai,",,'
Miii:t
~
~
Ri1
L!!!!l
See
Notes
ITiiiTIiY~
l!!:lli~~
o Grading and Paving Plan
Complete Incomplete
1"3<I~1!!Ili'l
~~
10/23/06
Ri1
lSE;J
~
~,.,
~'illr
~'-'
"'"IC"
r;=;]
~
~
~
See'
, Notes
~"", .,\Zrl1!
\'''''2 "0." './
w,.' .~,~
Prepared by an Oregon Licensed Civil Engineer
All existing and proposed easements,
Location of existing and required power poles,
transfo'rmers, neighborhood mailbox units and
similar public facilities' '
Location and width of all existing and proposed
sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways
and trails '
Location and size of existing and proposed utilities
on and adjacent to the site including sanitary sewer'
mains, stormwater management systems, water
mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV.
Indicate the proposed connection points
Prepared by an Oregon Licensed Civil Engineer
, Planting plan prepared by an Oregon Licensed
, Landscape Architect where plants are proposed as '
part of the stormwater management. system
Roof drainage patterns and discharge locations " ,
Pervious 'and, impervious area:drainage patterns
The size and location of stormwater management
systems components"including but not limited to:'
drain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention
ponds; stormwater quality measures; and natural
drainageway's to be retained, '
Existing and proposed spot elevations and contours
lines drawn at 1 foot intervals (for land with a slope
over 10 percent, the contour lines may be at 5 foot
,intervals) . '
Amount of proposed cut and fill
, PRE-SUBMIlTAl RECIO
:!.Q. "-ltJ;-0'b
7
o Storm water Management System Study-four copies of a study with the completed
Stormwater Scopin9 Sheet attached, The plan, supporting calculations and
documentation must be consistent with the Engineering Design Standards and
Procedures Manual.
Complete Incomplete .see
Notes
JjID-
'$'iifJ.
'ffl'.....,
Scoping Sheet and attached Stormwater
Management System Study'
, Notes: ,
1. A Site Assessment plan of the development area is needed per Springfield
Development Code Section 31.050(2). The plan shall show existing features of the
site (topography, existing conditions, etc) and:
, '
a. The name, location, dimension and direction of flow and top ot"b"ank of all
watercourses if applicable. '
b. The 100-year floodplain and floodway boundaries if. applicable
c. The time of trayel 'zones for wellhead protection
d. Physical features including significant clusters of trees and shrubs, wetlands,
existing impervious surfaces, etc. ' '
e. The soil types"and water table information as mapped and specified in the Soils
Survey of Lane County. '
2. There are no existing or proposed easements shown on the plan set. The applicant
should show'existing easements if applicable, and provide a standard 7 foot Public
Utility Easement along the lot front~ge of 42nd Street. An' additional easement, may be
necessary for the proposed water meters along 42nd Street.'
. . ' ".-' -. .
-, . ,
Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application: '
, ' ,
, 3. The ,Civil drawing plan sheet C3 shows details forthe proposed 'water quality"swale.
, The seed mix has not been called out and, references the Architect's plan drawing .
sheets. This information is' not contained on the architeCtural drawings, but should be
provided upon plan re-submittal.' '
P~E-SUBM!ITAL REC'O
: fO:/clJ-f~,~b
, ",
'. ---~~ ;....
10/23/06
8
,,' ~S~)\
SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION
PRE~SUBMITTAl CHECKLIST \0 ,'2,L\.Oo
BUILDING
o Site Assessment of Existing Conditions
Complete Incomplete
.
~
~
See
Notes
~~lL~,
,~~
Soil types and water table information as
mapped .and specified in the Soils Survey of
, " ," Lane County. A Geotechnical Report prepared
, /.......Yr-\__~I'. \~~ by an Engineer must be submitted concurrently
c.:-I~""~ \ ~~ -\ if the Soils Survey indicates the proposed ,
.'L,' , '\" ~' \ development area has unstable soils and/or a
,~""\. '-...J0c....'\'0C\ec\ higl:1 water table ' "
o Site Plan
'Complete
~'-~
" ,,;f , <<~':
", ..~_U""",
~~,
~.
, ;/ete
, See
Notes
f0jj;l~
1!EI~1
Proposed buildings: location, dimensions, size
,(gross floor area), setbacks from property
Jines, distanc~ between buildings, and height
Location, dimensions and number of typical,
compact and disabled parking spaces; including
aisles, ,landscaped areas, wheel bumpers,
directional signs and striping'
On-site loading' areas 'and yehicular and
pedestrian circulation' '
,0 Grading, Paving andStormwater Management Plan
Complet!'!
Roof drainage Pi3tterns' and dis,charge locations
Existing and proposed spot'elevatiohs and contours'
lines drawn at 1 foot intervals (for land with a slope
over 10 percent, the contour lines may be at 5 foot
intervals)
/
~. Amount of proposed cut and fill
~
~-c ~....C\\W6~
" PRE-SUBMIITAlREC'O
=J.O:-d- ~Jd&
10/23/06
~
In'complete
--,.",..." /' ,"
~.
~'
See
Notes
~'
9
,q Architect~ral Plans:
,Complete Incomplete
,,'" ~,_4, /YlliThiiTI!*" ' , ~
~& ~
~
~.'
:;~
~-
Notes:
See
Notes
~iill'-""""'i
. "t'B;5^"
,,:i?U!~Z
~~
Exterior elevations o'f all buildings and structures
proposed for the development site
nd area of exterior lighting
, '
Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application:
10/23/06 '
<
, '
,."
PRE-SUBMITIA!. REC'O
',JD~~i~J&~ ,.
to
ANY 'REQUIRED"'~DDITIONAL MATERIA~S, APPLICATIONS OR
PERMITS
IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF'ADDITIONAL
STANDARDS/APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE APPLICANT
SHOULD CONSIDER UTILIZING EITHER THE DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING OR THE PRE-
APPLICATION REPORT FOR MORE, DETAILED INFORMATION:
Applicable Not
Applicable
[jI
f'<<l
t:SSI
Proposed deed restrictions and a draft of any 'Homeowner's
Association Agreement
Additional plans and documentation for submittal of a Cluster
Subdivision proposal as specified in SDC Section 16.100(3)
Riparian Area Protection Report For properties located within 150
feet of the top of bank of any Water Quality LilT)ited
"Watercourses (WQLW) or within 100 feet of the top of bank of
,any direct tributaries of WQL,W '
A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be
submitted concurrently if there are unstable soils and/or a hig~
water table present -
,~
~,
~'"
",Hl
,';-','l(
~
[jI
~
~
~
, . '
Where the development area is within an overlay district
, applicable, 'address the additional standards of the overlay
'district ' "
, ,
~
~
. If five or more trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling
, Permit as speCified in SDC Article 38, .
~'
~
A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon Dil!ision of State
, Lands must be submitted concurrently where there is a wetland
, ," on the property
. Any required federal or state permit must be submitted
concurrently or evidence the permit application has been
submitted for review '
Ril,"*,',
Llli:J
~
1'<<1
122:::]
Ril,
.~
Where any grading, filling or excavating is proposed with the
development, a Land and Drainage Alteration permit must be
submitted with the land use application
~' ,
,"'''' .
=.
~
- '
Where applicable, 'any Discretionary Use" Variance or
Modification of Provisions as specified in SDC Article 10 or 11
-
,
PRE-SUBMIITAI, REC'D
10 -;).. LfI.i(0~
10/23/06
12
THIS ApPLICATION IS:
o COMPLETE FOR PROCESSING "
~ INCOMPLETE AND NEEDS MISSING INFOR~ATION NOTED ABOVE
~ffZS~
City Planner
/i: Y,ft ~
This is not a decision on your application. Springfield Development Code Sections
3.050(3)-(6) and Oregon Revised Statutes 227.178 require the City take final action on a
limited land use decision within 120 days after the application is deemed complete. The 120-
day processing period for this application begins when all the missing information is
submitted or when you request that the City proceed without the information. You must
indicate by either signing this form or by submitting a written response to the City within
seven days of the date of this form asserting your intentions regarding the provision of the
missing information, If you indicate herein or in your written response the missing ,
information will be submitted, then you h1lVe 180 days from the date the application was
submitted for Pre-Submittal. Review to provide the City with the missing information. If you
refuse to submit the missing information, then'upon receipt of the full application packet and
processing fee, the City will deem the application complete for purposes of starting the 120-
day clock and begin processing the application. No new information may be submitted after
the start of the 120-day period unless accompanied by a request for an extension of the
120-day processing time. Upon receipt of a request for extension, the City may extend the
120-day period for a reasonable period of time. The City may also require additional fees if
, the new information is submitted after the Notification to Surrounding Property Owners is "
sent out and a second notification is required orifth'e new information substantially affects
the application proposal and additional review, is required. " ..
"
I, the owner , PPli~an end to submit all missing items indicated herein to the
City wit i e 180r~~in~. ' .",..,
, .~~"':
~ Owner/Applicant's Signature
, ".. : PRE~SUBM\TIAl REC'D ",
.. lP"'~~~ '
10/23/06
13