Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutComments PWS 8/26/2008 ( ,.. Page 1 of2 " DAVIS Lissa From: MOORHEAD Chris Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 5:30 PM To: Dan Nelson Cc: DAVIS Lissa; ERNST Dennis; HOPKINS Steve Subject: Rosemont Cottages Subdivision, SUB2007-00050; Review #1 Dan, Here are the City's review comments for this 1 st submission of Rosemont Cottages: SHEET 1 : f . , . Just below the Basis of Bearings label, the distance "92.37" looks like it should actLally be closer to I, "181.57" based on the crow's feet I' . On the East property line, instead of showing the PUE as."existing 14' PUE (2)" pl~ase show the 2 separate 7' wide PUE's per the individual reel and reception numbers. I: I' . On the 28' wide joint-use easement you show a bearing-<listance on only the NE line, Why is just that line labeled and not the rest of the easement? You don't actually need to label any lines on the easemeni since it is just an offset from the Lot Lines. " SHEET 2: . There are 2 first lines on the Narrative. I, . On the Surveyor's Certificate, line 3, it says the iron pipe is "as set in the Adams Plat', I don't see anywhere on the Adams Plat where it says what they set at the corners or if indee~ they set anything, Do you want to certify that the % IP is set by the Adams Plat? I would suggest taking that out and just saying it is ""marking the corner of Lot 28 of the Adams Plat Subdivision,." like you already ,have in the next line. . On the Declaration, line 6, please add "Joint-Use" to the easement . I, . Also on the Declaration, between (4) and (5) please acknowledge the existence of"the 7' PUE per reel . 213D, reception 2685 :' . . Also on the Declaration, (6), it says "do hereby extinguish the following easemen~ as' created... ", Only one of those easements was created on the plat, the other Private access and utility easement was created by separate document Please change those notes to reflect that " . On the Foumal Acknowledgement, "MEMBER" is misspelled. GENERAL COMMENTS: , , . . On the Title Report, the easements in numbers 3. and 4. need to be delineatedor~ddressed in a note if l' unable to locate. . , . - ~. : . There needs to be consent to platting for the deeds of trust in numbers 15. and 17: . Also, there is just one concurrence note on Sheet 2 of the plat There will need to be notes for each concurrence or space for each recording number. l' , We haven't done th~ .field check yet, but later this week it will be done and I will let you kri6w if I have any other comments. Thanks, Chris . . ~ Attached below are the county's comments as well I tried not to repeat any of Peggy's comments in mine. Let me know if you have any questions. " Date Received' 8r.~T\ OB. -1\-~, Planner: Lb ~urW-QjA ~V(i\JUtJ>'.J. p~~ . 8/27/2008 . Page 2 of2 Chris. Moorhead, PLS Surveyor, City of Springfield Public Works 225 Fifth Stree~ Springfield, Oregon 97477 Tel. 541-736-1011 Fax 541-726-3781 cmoorhead@ci.sRring[lt;,lcf,9f.us From: HUNTER Peggy K rmailto:Peoo1l.HUNTERiWCO.Lane.OR.US] Sent:Wednesday;August 06,200810:17 AM To: MOORHEAD Chris; ERNST Dennis; GNENS Everett L Subject: FW: Rosemont Cottages--SUB 2007-00050 -- Comments LANE ,COUNTY SURVEYOR'S OFFICE COMMENTS Dear Dennis & Chris, With r,gard to this Subdivision please have Mr. Betz address the following: I. Please change Title Block to replat"Lot 29" of Adams Plat 2. The bearing to the Fd 5/8" at the SW comer Lot I app\,ars to be reversed. 3.. Change the Concurrence to read "subdividing". Three Deeds of Trust appear on the Titl~ report as well as several easements not shown on the Plat. I'. I' 4. Taxes for 2008-2009 on the property must be certified as paid prior to recording. 5. Fees Due: (payable to "Lane County", two checks please) Recording Fees: Processing & Filing: $106 + Docs? $700 '. Ua\1:i r<ecelvert" 2'A~1-\ a?J -t- Planner: l'\) s,i.VVLlPj CffY'U'\.OJlv'O .. P 2- 8/27/2008