Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNotice PLANNER 3/31/2009 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE STATE OF OREGON } }ss. County of Lane } I, Brenda Jones, being first duly sworn, do hereby depose and say as follows: 1. I state that I am a Secretary for the Planning Division of the Development Services Department, City of Springfield, Oregon. 2. I state that in my capacity as Secretary, I prepared and caused ,to be , mailed copies of Notice of Water Withdrawal for 2009 re: LRP2007- 00009, AKA LRP2009-00002 (See attachment "A") on March 31,2009 addressed to (see Attachment "B"), by causing said letters to be placed in a U.S. mail box with postage fully prepaid thereon. n dr Brenda Jones Planning Administrative Specialist STATE OF OREGON, County of Lane . OjlJ/V.-I / ,2009 Personally appeared the above named Brenda Jones, Administrative Specialist, who acknowledged the foregoing instrument to be their voluntary act. Before me: OFFICIAL SEAL DEVETTE KELL V NOTARY PUBLIC. OREGON COMMISSION NO. 420351 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES AUG. 15, 2011 ~/0jJU My c:mmission EXPires~ _ 'if' /ts;fl, . ' uate11ecelved MAR 3)' 2009 Planner: BJ. SPRINGFIELD '1: ' ""' ;; ~: '.. . 225 FIFTH STREET. SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 . PH: (541)726-3610 . FAX: (541)726-3689 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM:' CARTOGRAPHIC UNIT, OREGON DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE BRENDA JONES, PLANNiNG ADMINISTRATIVE SPECIALISTt{ WAlER DISTRICT WITHDRAWAL FOR THE CITY OFSPRlNGFlEW 3/31/2009 BOB DUEY, CITY OF SPRINGFIElD; ALICE MARKS, LANE COUNTY TAX AND ASSESSORS OFFICE; ANNETIE NEWINGHAM, LANE COUNTY ElECTIONS; MARlA TRAPPEN, SPRlNGFlEW UTILITY BOARD; RAY MEDUNA, SPRINGFIElD UTILITY BOARD; TIM HANlEY, RAINBOW WA lER DISTRICT; JEFF DEFRANCO, SPRlNGFlEW SCHOOL DISTRICT 19; NW NATURAL; QWEST; TOM HENERTY, COMCAST CABlE; ANNETIE CARDOZA, SANIPAC. SUBJECT: DATE: CC: Enclosed is the paper work for one (1) water withdrawal for the City of Springfield. I have included the Springfield City Council signed Ordinance # 6239, which includes prior annexation information and exhibits. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding any information associated with this memo. Date Received. MAR 3~1'2009 Planner: BJ ORDINANCE NO: 6239 AN ORDINANCE WITHDRAWING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY KNOWN AS JACKSON, LOCATED IN THE HAYDEN BRIDGE ROAD AREA OF NORTH SPRINGFIELD, WEST OF 19'" STREET AND INCLUDING PROPERTIES OWNED BY DANIEL AND SHANNON JACKSON. THE WITHDRAWAL INVOLVES APPROXIMATELY 9 ACRES IDENTIFIED AS A PORTION OF TAX LOT 2006, T17S R03W S24 MAP31 AND ALSO KNOWN AS 277S N 19'" STREET; HERETOFORE ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD FROM THE RAINBOW WATER DISTRICT. WHEREAS, certain real property described below was annexed to the City of 'Springfield by order of Lane County Local Government Boundary Commission under Boundary Commission Number File EC SP DS- 16, effective 1/25/0S, as recommended in City Planning File No. LRP2007-00009 and supported by City Council Resolution No. D7- 57 (and further described in Exhibit A & B), and WHEREAS, the property to be withdrawn is located within the boundaries of the Rainbow Water District, and, I : ! WHEREAS, the City of Springfield Common Council held a public hearing and ,first reading in the Springfield City Council Chambers on March 2, 2009, and a second reading and adoption on March 16, 2009, in accordance with ORS 222.524, for the purpose of hearing any objections' to the withdrawal of the property from the public service district mentioned and :there having been no objections raised, NOW TI:iEREFORE THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS; Section '1: The Common Council of the City of Springfield does hereby determine that the real property described should be in the best interest of the City :of Springfield withdrawn from the Rainbow Water District in Lane County, Oregon, insofar as the property is located therein. Section 2: The Common Council of the City of Springfield does hereby determine that the following described real property within the boundaries of the Rainbow Water District is and shall be witharawn from the Rainbow Water District in Lane County, Ore'gon, said property being described as follows: Township 17South, Range 03West, Section 24, Map 31, that portion of Tax Lot 2000 within the Urban Growth Boundary of Springfield, as more particularly described in Exhibit B of this ordinance, Boundary Commission File Number EC 2P OS':' 16. ADOPTED by the Common Council of the City of Springfield this 16" day of March ~OD9, by a vote of ~ for and ~ against. APPROVED by <h. .\~~'o1Ii"'1fi);;;::r 1::1:;'; M,," 2009. ~~ Council President ATTEST: ~j~ 1lJ"":-;:;;-:':'" 0 r"""',~,\1Ciiy R#rder ~u:.~ H,:j;;: J:U (:~ ;\if+:h\JctJ As.. TO FOr,i~ \. '- \cr,. <""..(I \., ~ ~~~ DATE: :2. I '2 'I I D9 ) OFFICE OF CITY i'.nOp.NEY Date Received MAR 3)2009 Planner: BJ EXHIBIT A - Febrgary 12, 2007 BranchNo. 06-203 LEGAL DESCRIl'UON FOR ~TIONl'URPOSES LANDS OF DANlEL L AMl SH:ANNON L JACKsON (pORTION OF TAX MAP 17-03-24-31. TAX LOT 2000) .' SITUA~ in unincorporated arcainLane C~ty, State of Oregon in the Southwest 1/4 onlection 24, Township 17 South, Range 3 West of the Willml.ettc MeriQian and descn'bed as follows: , . .D.IWJ,'t G a portion of the lands that ~e conveyed to Daniel L. and Shannon Batty in that certain Special Wa........o.l Deed that was recorded May 16,1990 in Reel 1632R at Reception N:imlher 9022540 in the Official Records of Lane Cotmty, State of Oregon, said portion being more particularly described as follows: . , . . Co~encing at ap?int 17.42 cJ:ains n~ 6~ a point wh~e tlie ~ast line of the. William C. s~ci:r Donation Land Claim N=b~, Notification Number .:>265, mtersects the line between Section ,24 andSection25. Township 17 South, Range 3 W",,~ul JJ.eWillamctteMeridian; thence North 89' . , 42' 33" West 393.00 feet and North. 00' 06' 16" West 22~.00 feet to the Su,,1L.Y"I...st comer of said . . lands that wke conveyed in the aboVe deed, which point lies on the existing city limits line of tlie . City ofSpri:dgfield and is the.l.Ku.I!, FOINTQF BE\:rll:mll\G lifthe lands being descn'bedherein; .lJ::l..l!J.'l CE leaving said TRUE FaINT OF iJEGlll~ 1,4\ G md along said city limits line mid west . line of said landS tlmI: were coiIVeyedin said deed, NORm 00' 06' 16" WEST 909 FEET, more or iess, to an angle point In the U:rlJan GrowthBound;uy of the City of Springfield; .l.w..!'l CE,leavmg said city limits ,line and said west line of said lands that were conveyed in said. deed, NORm 63 ' 35' EAST 435 r.~..tu, mor~or less, along said Urban Growth Boundary to an angle point in said boundary that lies on the east line of said lands that were conveyed m: said deed;.l.J::Lr..J.'t W!., lellVing said Urbl!U G. u .i.1Boundary and alQIlg said east line of said lands tlmI: were conveyed in said deed, SOUIH 00'06' 24" EAST 1100 rnp!, more or lesS, to the southeast comer of said lands that were . cOJIVCyed in.the 'said deed; AND THENCE, along the south line of said lands that were COIlVcycd in the said deed NORTH 89' 42'33" WEST393.00 r=.L REl1lRNINGto.the TRUEru.LLu OF BE\:dm't.LL'tG arid CONTAINlNG 9.0 A~S, more or less. ' . i:.e-b w"lAa "'1 (Z /lOJ 7 r Date Received, ~EC 0 3 zoo~ Planner: BJ " REGISTERED' ... PROFESSIONAL LANDSURVE'[OR . ~~ OREBON JULV20,1S93 REX^- BETZ mllA ./ !-t."(. ~~ f~/'J(/07 ATTACHMENT 1 - 2 . "" "'! 'iii ~~ " B~ :~ ~~~I~~ . ~G:;~;:. . :~~;I~ . . gB:1 . . ~~.. -~... ; ~ :.; . ~ . '..r . .1- , I i III. . & 'JI . II . I EXHIBITS. ' -" . _.....~ ' : ..... !I~..i .. . ... - , I 3 ~ 1I A I , / .. f i ! .I. ...- , . --... 3 ---ATTACHMENT 1 - _ --, , -oregon ""I . January 15,2008 LANE COUNTY LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION 99 Eas, Broadway Suite 400 Eugene, OR 97401-3111 (541) 682-4425 FAX (541) 682-2635 SUBJECT: Boundary Commission Members; Lane County ,Commissioners; Lane County I:.and Management Division; Lane County Environmental Health Division; City of Springfield; WillaiDalane Park and Recreation District; Daniel and Shannon Jackson; and Jeanette Applauso at Branch Engineering Paula L Taylor, Executive OffiQJo.. d-~. EC SP 08 -16 (Expedited Procedure) , ,,~~IVcL, ANNEXA TION OF TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF EUCl (Jackson) . ' TO: FROM: Enclosed is a copy of the staff analysis for this proposal. It is sent to you as required by ORS 199.466. 'Please read the analysis carefully. The proposal is recommended for auuroval without a ou blic hearin!! or further staff stUfy. There are two alternatives: I. ]f you agree with this recommendation, you need do nothing. 2. ]f you feel that a public hearing is needed, 'you must request, in writing by January 25, 2008, that a hearing should be set. The request must be in the commission's office by 5:00 p.m., Januarv 25th. You must use the form that is provided at the end of the staff analysis to request a hearing. For units of government, the form , should be signed by the chairman/mayor.or other authorized person. ]f you or your unit of government requests a public hearing, the boundary commission asks that you att~nd the requested public bearing. ]f a hearing is requested, it will be set for the next available boundary commission public hearing. . IF YOU HA VB ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THE PROPOSAL OR PROCEDURE, PLEASE CONTACT OUR OFFICE (541-682-4425). Attachments pc: LCSC: /.:\BClEXAMEMO\JOOIMCSPOBJ6 MEM.DOC Last Savetf JanJUJry./5,200B . ATTACHMENT 1 - 4 . Date Received MAR 7 2008 Planner: 'BJ EXPEDITED PROCEDURE - STAFF ANALYSIS lANE COUNTY LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSlON Annexation of Territorv to the Citv of Sorinrneld (Jackson), 1. BCFile EC SP 08 - 16 Initiated by Resolution No. 07-57 by the City of Springfield with property owner consents Action under ORS 199.466 and 199.490(2)(a)(A) of the boundary w""""";ssion law Deemed vaiid December 31, 2007 ' Public hearing requests by January 25, 2008 Descrintion The annexation area includes one tax Jot located in north Springfield, north of Yolanda Ih ' , Avenue, west of 19 Street, east of Vera Street Property owners: Daniel and Shannon Jackson t277819. s_~ Springfield) , Taxlot: part of 2000, T17SR03W S24Map31 Acres: :t 9.00 Estimate of existing population: 2 (one single-family residence) Existing land use: Reside~al, vacant, orchard ' ' :&i.sting zoning in Lane County: LDRIUF, low-density residential with urbanizing fringe overlay . Applicable comprehensive plan: Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan (acknowledged August 1982 and has been subsequently amended) Existing public services to the property: Police (Oregon State Police, Lane County Sheriff), schools (Springfield School District 19), roads (City of Springfield, Lane County), water (well), wastewater (onsite individual wastewater system),. electricity (SUB) Reason for Annexation The property owners requested annexation in order to prepare the annexation area for residential development. The Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan requires properties to annex in order to receive urban services. ' . . This annexation proposal was filed in accordance with ORS '199.490(2)(a)(A), initiated by the city council with consents from owners, and ORS 199.466 (expedited procedure). Before initiating the annexation, the City of Springfield received written consents from the owners consenting to the annexation. No other properties are included in the annexation request. The statutory requiTement for an annexation to be initiated bya city council after receiving, written consents from, owners is met. ' ORS 199.466 authorizes approval of annexations without a public hearing 0;' adoption of a final order if requested by the principal petitioner, Under the expedited procedure, the boundary . commis~i~n e~ecutive officer..must prepare an analysis of the proposal withinf!)ate> ReCeived ATTACHMENT 1 - 5 MAR . 7 2008 Planner: BJ LCLGBC Staff Analysis (ECSPOB-J6)- January 15, 2008 Page I afJO receipt. If, after 25 days from the filing date (in this case, Janua.ry 25'\ no written objections are ' received from direct recipients of this staff analysis, the request is approved. However, if any direct recipient of this staff analysis does object, the proposal is scheduled for the next regular boundary c91Dlllission public hearing. Direct recipients are the individuals eligible to request a public hearing .and are listed below under the fIrst boundary commission standard. The proposed annexation area includes a portion of one tax lot that is developed with one single- family residence (refer to Maps No. I.and 2). The owners of the property requested aimexation in order to prepare the annexation area for low-density residential development. The annexation area is not contiguous to the main body of the City of Springfield., but abuts other noncontiguous' portions of the city. It is located within the acknowledged urban growth boundary (UGB), which' lies along the northern boundary of the a,nnexation area The portion of this p' vp~' ~y located outside the UGB is not being annexed and will not be provided urban services. The existing zoning of the annexation area is lDRlUF, low-density residential with urbanizing fringe overlay,dn Lane County. It is designated low-density residential in the Eugene-Sprfugfield Metropolitan ~rea General Plan (Metro Plan).' Upon the effective date of the annexation, the annexation area will be automatically zoned lDR consistent with the low-density residential plan designation. ' ~ , Resolution No. 07-57, unanimously approved by the Springfield city council On November 23, 2007, initiated the annexation. The city council's support for the annexation was based on evidence that the annexation area could be provided with key urban services. As requested by the council, the annexation request was forwarded io ,the boundary commission. The city council reviewed the Annexation Agreement between the city and the property owners outlining the agreements b~tween the two parties for the provision of urban serVices and financing responsibilities before supporting the annexation. The Annexation Agreement has been fully' executed and is part of the boundary commission's record for this application. . Following is a ,brief analysis of each of the boundary commission standards. Provide an, impartial forum for resolution of local jurisdictional questions. Consider the effec!s of the boundary change on other units of governments. ORS 199.410(1)(b) . and 199.410(3)(c) This annexation request was filed in accordance with provisions in ORS 199 and was determined to be a valid filing hi accordance with OAR 191-006 (adopted administrative rule on boundary commission fIling requirements). The petitioners requested the proposal be processed using the expedited procedure. " This staff analysis was sent to the following direct recipients: Lane boundary w"""""";ssion members, Lane County commissioners, Lane County Land Management Division, Lane County Environmental Health Division, City of Springfield, Willamalane Park and Recreation District, ' , ' ' Daniel and Shann,on Jackson, and Jeannette Applauso at Branch Enginecrinb . d ' . '. " ate Receive LCLGBC Staff Analysis'recSPo8-16)- January 15, 2008 Page 2 of 10 MAR 72008 .." ATTACHMENT 1 - 6 Planner: 8J , " Upon the annexation effective date, the area will be annexed automatically to the Lane County Metropolitan Water Seryice District and the WiIlamalane Park and Recreation District [ORS 199.51O(2)(c)] because the dty is a part ,of 'both' these special districts. The Lane County Metropolitan Wastewater Service District was fonned to provide the fmancing for the regional wastewater treatment plant serving wastewater usen; within the cities of Euge~e and Springfield and other users within L1e urbanizable ::rea. The park district provides park and recreation services and facilities to Springfield residents. . This request is,consistent with this boundary commission 'standard. Consider the order.ly determination and adjustment of local government boundaries to best meet the needs of Lane County and Oregon... Consider alternative solutions where intergovernmental options are identified and make decisions based on the most effective long- range option among identified alternatives. ORS 199.410(1), 199.410(2), and 199.410(3)(a) and (e) The annexation ,area is located within the acknowledged UGB of the Metro Plan and is not contiguous to the main body of the City of Springfield. 'Territory within the UGB ultimately will be within the City of Springfield. Annexation of this property fulfills the policies adopted in the Metro Plan of annexing out to the(stban growth boundary. . Noncontiguous annexations are allowed by state annexation law and provided for in the Metro Plan if certain criteria are met. The Metro Plan policy for noncontiguous annexation (policy #12, page ll-C-5) requires that noncontiguous annexations meet the following criteria: . a. The area to be annexed wlll be provided urban service(s), which is (are) desired immediately by the residents/property owners. b.,The areil to be anpexed can be serviced (with a minimum level of services, as directed in the Metro Plan) in a timely and cost-efficient manner and is a logical extension of the city's service delivery system. \ . . c. The annexation proposal'is accompanied by 'suppoI1 within the area'JlIOposed for ,annexation fiom the owners of at leasl half the land area in the affected territory. The incremental process of annexation' causes short-tenn boundaries to be established; The ackn.owledged comprehensive plan in this area identifies the ~ity of Springfield as the unit of . government, which will provide urban services to this urbanizable area within the UGB. In the long tenn, territory within this geographic area will be annexed to Springfield. This annexation is consistent with boundary commission administrative, rule, impiementing policies (I), (2), (5), and (7), which recogrilze annexation to an' existing' city as the preferred method of.servicing urbanizable land. ' :' _:.._...~ I ,< :.. ~ fo..,;:.'.. I..~ ATTACHMENT 1 - 7 DateRecen~d MAR 7 ZOO8 ,Planner~ R.I LCLGBC Staff Analysis CEC SP 08 -16) - January ]5, 2008 Page 3 of 10 (1) This policy recognizes cities as the logical providers of urban levels of service within urban growth boundaries when consistent with the comprehensive plan. (2) 'This policy expresses the commission's preference for providing urban services through annexation to a city in order to 'provide urban services to urbanizable lands. (5) This policy encourages provision of urban levels of service within urban growth boundaries. (7) This policy expresses the commission's preference for annexation to an existing ,city over all other alternatives as a means of.extending services to urbanizable lands; Implementing ':policy (3) recognizes t!1at in order to meet the long-term objectives of annexing out to an acknowledged UGB, short-term boundaries are created, which are logical within the context of the future service boundary., This proposal to annex tenilory, to the City of Springfield is consistent with boundary commission policies and this,stan9ard. f( . Make boundary commission ,determinations, which are consistent with' acknowledged local comprehensive plims. Assure an adequate quality and quantity of public services required in the comprehensive pw.n to meet existing and future growth. For major boundary changes, there must bl( assurance that the proposed' unit of government is financially. viable. ORS 199.410(1)(d), 199.410(3)(b) and (d) The annexation area is within the Metro Plan UGB. The Metro Plan was acknowledged by the Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC) in August ]982 imd has been subsequently amended. The Metro Plan recognizes annexation as the highest priority for extending theminimurn range of urban services to urbanizable areas (policies #8 and #10, page lI-C-4) and recognizes that ultimately, all teiritory within the UGB will be annexed to an existing city (policy #16, page lI-C-S)., 'Fhe annexation area is designated lIS low-density reSidential in the Metro Plan. Upon the, effective date of the annexation, the annexation area will be automatically 'rezoned to LOR in ihe city. The annexation area will take advantage of urban service delivery systems that are already in place to serve this area. The following services are either aVaIlable or can be extended to ,the annexation area. Water - Springfield Uti,lity B.oard (SUB) will provide water service 10 the annexationare~ following annexation. An existing 6-inch line is located at the east end of Vera Street and is ,,:vailab]e to serve th~ anl,lexation area. Date R~ived LCLGBC Staff Analysis (ECSP08-16)-January ]5,2008 ." Pagc:4ofio '. '. r, ".:;''''_''- ATTACHMENT 1 - 8 l\lA~ i iG;;'d PI:tnnAr: BJ Electricitv - SUB indicates that it provides electric service in this general ~a and can provide service to ne~ development within the annexation area. Upon annexation and development, undcrground !lower will be extended 10 the annexation area from an e$sting line near the intersection oiY olanda Street and 191h Street. ' ;~ . . 'I Police services - The Springfield police departIilent can provide police pfotection to the area after annexation without jeopardizing service in olherparts of the city. Spririgfiel,d police already provide service to nearby .I',vpw;';es within the city. " ' Fire and emer?encv services - The ,annexation area .is currently without strusturaJ fire protectiori. Annexation to!;the city will provide these services to the developing area. The annexation area is ' located within,' the four minute response time area of the Springfield Fire imd Life Safety Fire Stations 3, 4" and 5. Development of the annexation area will be subject to all applicable Springfield development code and fire code requirements to provide adequate.frre and]Ie safety access and water supply'. ,. !i , ~: Emergency medical transport (ambulance) services, are provided on a regional basis by Springfield, Springfield, and Lane Rural Fire'lRescue to central Lane Cou*y. The annexation area will continue to receive this service consistent with the adopted ambulance service area (ASA) plan. J:.1utual aid agreemtJits have been adopted by the three regional ASA providers to provide bl;lCkup coverage for each other's jurisdictions, ' , " , . ; , Parks and iecrbation - Mter annexation, the ann'exation area will be within the Willamalane Park and Recreation District boun'dary. City ~ideI)ts receive.park and recreatibn services from the I ..j district. The district operates two aquatic centers, a community center, an adult activity center, and 3] parks c;ontaining a variety of outdoor recreational amenities. The closest park to the site is Royal Delle, a 2.76-acre neighborhood park at 401 Blackstone' Street. Other nearby recreational opportunities indude harvest Landing and page Park. ' , Schools - S~ringfield School District 19 serves this area. , Existing schools-Yolanda elementary, Briggs middle, and Springfield high-serve this neighborhood aDd can a~~v""uodate students resulting from new development occurring within the annexation at6a. ~~ Wastewater ~'Springfield staff indicates a, public wastewater system: is . currently under construction imd 'includes a new lift station located in the annexation area. Future site development ~ill be served from this lift station upon acceptance by the city council (expected by May 2008)', As a part of the system construction, a I5-inch diameter w~tewater main will be extended from the lift station to the existing westerly right-of-way of ]9th Street. The Annexation Agreement .requires the applicant to extend the I5-inch line along] 9th Street and the Hayden Bridge Stub prior to the street construction.. The public system as cionstructed will have sufficient capacity and sufficient depth to serve. the annexation area. The applicant is required to construct a public gravity wastewater system to serve the annexation area, as necded, in addition to the 15-inch'wastewater main desCDoed above. " ATTACHMENT 1 - 9 'I: _ - Dato ReCflived ; MArl , V 700B PI~nnor' D I " . ;', LCLGBC Staff Analy* (ECSPOB-16)-January 15,2008 Page 5 of 10 Stonnwater - Springfield staff indicates an eXlstmg ] 8-inch public stOnhwaler malJa~ment system is located adjacent to the west line of the annexation area, Qi'i',vAima!ely 240 feet north of the centerline of Vera Street. Another existing 12-inch public stoIIDwater management system is located adjacent to the west line of the annexation area; approximately 1i70 feet south of the centerline of Vera Street. 'The applicant will be allowed to connect to eitper or both of these existing public stormwater management systems, but will be required to provide pre-treatment for 100 percent of newly paved surfaces, using such methods as double chainbered catch basins with oil flltration media or a water quality manhole. Additionally, a mininJum of 50 percent of ' the non-buildmg rooftop runoff impervious, surfaces on the annexation area shall be treated vegetatively, u,sing methods such as a bioswale. The applicant will be required to maintain thc post-developed runoff rate of flow equal to or below the pre-development rate of flow. The city grants developInent approval only where adequate public and/or private storlnwater management system provisions have been made as determined by the public works direttor, consistent with the city~s EngineeringDesign Standards and Procedures Manual. i' ' , . Streets - Springfield staff indicates the annexation area has frontage on 19th Street which is under the jurisdiction of Lane County. Along this frontage, ] 9th Street is not improved. The section of 19lh Street right-of-way north of Yolanda Street is a local access road (tAR) which does not receive countY maintenance. On this section of 19th Street, the travel way is an unimproved gravel surface; approximately 12 feet wide. Such a surface is not adequate to accommodate , additional traffic that would be ~cipated from the applicants' proposed de~elopment, and is not adequate to meet fire and life safety department needs. :: " . . . l 19th Street is :'designated as a collector street in Springfield's Conceptu~ Street Map. The applicants are required to dedicate land adjacent to t1ie westerly line of the ~xisting right-of-way sufficient to construct a fully-improved 2/3 width co]]e~tor street (compl~te with gutter, curb, Ih " , pavement, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees) along the 19 . Str,~et frontage of the annexation area. The applicants are required to dedicate a righl-of-way o~, 60 feet through tbe annexation area to facilitate the east-west connection of 19,hStreet with the'!existing Vera Street right-of-way and pavement and, to construct the easterly extension of Ver~ Street to an urban , standard from', the west line of .the annexation area to 19th Street (complete with gutter, curb, pavement, sidewalks, streetlights, and street trees). ,The applicants are requij'ed to provide for an improved secbndary access to the annexation area via either the extension of 19th Street to Yolanda AVcrlue or the improvement of Hayden Bridge Stub from 19~h Stre~t and easterly to the existing improved pavement. Further street/transportation requirements are outlined within the annexation agteement between the applicants and the city. ". , . ~I Solid waste manal!'emenl- Private fUins and individuals collect and transpbrt solid waste to the Lane County ~ministered landfill. . . Communication facilities - Various providers offer both wire and wireless communication services in th~ Springfield-Springfielp metropolitan area. 'Existing provideis and those entering the market have the capability to provide servicc to this area., . " , ATTACHMENT 1 -', Q Date iReceived I' ~ 1 roos I, . PlAnnAr~ R.I " " . LCLGBC Staff Analysis (ECSP08-16)- January 15,2008 Page 6 of 10 ' ,: , ...,)#", :w'"" ..... . Ii Land use conti-01l! - The annexation area is within Springfield's portion ~f the urban growth boundary. Through an intergovernmental ao,....went between Lane County and the City of ' Springfield, the city already has planning and building jurisdiction for this !,'v!'''''i. The city, will continue to administer land use controls after annexation. ' . , ' The minimum 'Ievel of required services are either inunediately available. or can be provided within a reasonable future time frame as needed. This request is consistent with boundary commission policies and this standard. j;. Consider the ,comprehensive plan's economic, demographic, and soci6logical trends and projections and its environmental policies, pertinent to the proposal. OR~ 199.410(3)(d) and 199.462(1) . The' annexatiqn proposal is consistent with the Metro Plan, as it is an ~'incremental step in implementing ,the long-range plan for this area. 'The UGB, land uses, and policies in the Metro Plan were developed to meet the future needs of the metropolitan conmlUni(y. The proposed use is consistent with the long~range plans for the area. , This proposed, annexation is consistent with this.boundary commission standard. 01 . " I' F-ecomrnendatiori if{ I . r The boundary comnussJOn staff recommends that the proposed annexation' to the Cily of Springfield (B,C File EC SP 08 - 16) be approved without the hearing and st3ff r~port as required ,by ORS 199.466. Jf a public hearing is requested, the !"v!,v.al will be' beard at the next available boundary commission p~blic hearing. Jf non~ is requested it will be approved and ~ffective January 25, 2008 (ORS IQ9.466 and ORSJ99.519). Ii ' ### , j: , l' Date Received t!Wl1ZOOB LCLGBC Staff Analysis (ECSPOB.-I6)- January 15,2008 I . ,Page 7 of 10 I, . ATTACHMENT 1 - 11 i Planner: BJ , , Sign and return this form to the boundary commission office ONLY ,if you desire that a public hearing be held. Office: 99 East Broadway, Suite 400, Eugene, Oregqn 97401-3111 " '" Pursuant to ORS 199.466, I REQUEST THAT A PUBUC HEARING and STAFF :~ i STUDY be coriducted on an annexation of territory to the City ofSpringfielq (EC SP 08 - I~), as' , . required by ORS 199.461. This form must be filed in the commission offi~e no later than 5':00 " \ I I p.m., lanuarv ~5_ 2008. ' Reason':forpublic hearing: Date .11 , Signature , 1i Title , I , . , tv. Representing ;r " Note: If you 'ilr your agency requests a pubJiC.heariilg, the commission ask~ that you attend the requested hearing. ,I pI: LCBC: J..:\BCII!:XP\200IM:CSPOB16 SN.DQC las. Sal'~d.- JaRuary15.2008 i; . -. ~ , . Lq..OBC S.!arf Analysis (ECSP08-16)- )anuary 1~. 2008 Page il of 10 Date,Reeeived MAR 7 2008 ATTACHMENT 1 - 12 " , ;Planner: BJ, MAP No.1 VIl.ll'u H MAP ' Ann6..atioD to Springfield (Jackson) ECSP08-l6 GENERAL LOCATION OF . ANNExATION AREA a ackson) (BC SF 08-16) 'f " , ' i ( 0.4 o 0.4 0.8 Miles "I UGB _ Jackson City streets I . . Arterial, major:' Arterial. minor' City Limits . .. SPR N w~. . .' ATTACHMENT 1 - 13 " Date Received ,MAR 7 2008 Planner: BJ LCLGBC Staff Analysis (ECSPOB-l6)-January 15,2008 Page90fl0 " MAI:!No.2 SITE MAP ' AnneXation to Springfield (Jackson) ECSP08-16 ."'----- .~ ~ " ----r ,:' __-r- --~ j/~',"~I , Ii' :1 r---p - 1 Y 0--=- . I T~ l-I"-'id&o ~r'01<-- Q:k I I -/ ~~U " -T\- -~ :'.; i~t . ! _ [I r- : '0 -; - :. , '. ',~ +1~cY\.- .'........ ....-- '...: """u I! (-.' II LL fl,- --i-!~U TrJ"b1=! =- '~'tiJlmifii~ --- " Date Re"ceived .. Ya~~so~ . . ", ',:, '::; . MAR. 72008 U TCI){ Lots City Limits SPR -... !'~~. : ~r. . ":;"" r- " ' , ~ , ANNEXATION AREA , , Includes part of TL 2000, 17-03-24-31' :: : Owned Py D!'J1iel and Shannon Jac:ks.:n if . _..:':' (Ee SF 08 - ~6} :.- .. i ,"" .. ' il. ~ "". , !.." .. ' Planner: BJ , . ~_9--GBC Staff;AIIlUysis (ECSP08-l6)-January 15, 2008 ,Page'!O:'onO"':;-~ ~ . . '....'1.. . " _.~, . ATTACHMENT 1 -14 ~i ,I 0" " 200 200 N + 400 Feet I I RESOLUTION NO 07-57 A RESOLUTION INITIATING ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO TIIE CITY OF SPRINGFlELD AND REQUESTING THAT THE LANE COUNTY LOCAL GOVERNMENT " BOUNDARY COMMISSION APPROVE THE ANNEXATION BY EArJ:llJUJ:llJ PROCESS. ' , I, WHEREAS, ti!e City received an application to annex approximately 9 acres into iJ,e City of Springfield on February 27, 2007, said territory being described as follows: " . ~ Township 17 South, Range 3 West, Section 24, Map 31, portion of Tax Lot 2qOO as more particularly described in Exhibit A of this Resolution. ' " WHEREAS, the '~~,;,v," to be annexed is within the Eugene-SpringfieldUtban,Gfowth Boundary, and is proximate to tile City limits; and, , . r WHEREAS, the City Council is authorized by ORS 199.490(2)(aXA) to initiate mlnexation upon receiving consent in writing from a majority of the electors registered in the territ~p' proposed to be annexed and written consent from more than half of the owners of land in the territory proposed to be annexed who ~Iso own more than half of the land in the ~"u;~v'i proposed to be almcxed and ofrcal , " :' property therein representing more than half ofthe assessed value of all real propertY in the territory proposed to be annexed; and, . ~ ~S, the property owners of;te certain territory descnoed in Exhibit A si~ed a consent to annex (EXhibit C); ap.d, : I ~I WHEREAS, tWo registered voters reside within the ~",,;~v'l and have signed a consent to annex (Exhibit C); a1i.d, " WHEREAS, the City Council is authorized by Springfield Development Code 6.030(2)(a) and ORS 222: 111 and other applicable Oregon Revised Statutes to initiate annexation when ,~he territory in the . annexation proposal can be provided with the minimum level of key urban. faciliti~s and servi,ces in an orderly and efficient manner as defmed in Eugene-Springfield Metro Area General Plan M;etro Plan Policies 8.a arid b, Page II-C-4; and where there will be a logical area and time within which to deliver urban services]and facilities; and ' , " WHEREAS, minimum level key urban facilities and services arc defined in the Eugene-Springfield Metro Area General ['lan, page Y-3 as wastewater service, Stormwater service, solid w~e'management, water service, fire arid emergency medical services, police ,,. V;"V;;on, city-wide parks and recreation programs, electric service, land use ~ontrols, communications facilities and services, and public schools on a district- wide basis; and " ,:: . WHEREAS, the territory proposed to be annexed can be immediately provided, wifu a minimum level of key urban facilities and services with the exception of public sanitary sewer service, public stormwater management service and street improvements, which arc being provided for in an Annexation Agreement which has been negotiated with City staff and the Owners, as described in Attachl!'ent 2: Informational Attachment, Case Number LRP2007-00009 and Attachment 4: Annexation A~ement; and WHEREAS, an annexation agreement has been proposed for execution by the CitY of Springfield and Daniel and Shannon Jackson; (Owners) which will memorialize the Owner's comriUlment, agreement and obligation to meet the City's requirements for proVision of the minimum level of key urban services as required for an a1fmnative City recommendation for the annexation request; and ATTACHMENT 1 - 15 WHEREAS, the City Manager is authorized to fOrWard this resolution supporting the applicant's request to the Lane CoUnty Local Government Boundary Commission when an annexation agreement is entered into by the CitY of Springfield and Daniel and Shannon Jackson; ~Owners); and Ii, WHEREAS, th~ City Manager is authorized to forWard this resolution supporting the applicant's request for expedited 'ptocessing to the Lane County Local Government Boundary Commission. " :1. :1 NOW THEREFORE BASED ON TIlE FOREGOING RECITALS, TIlE COMMON COUNClL OF TIlE CITX' OF SPRINGFIELD DOES RESOL VJ:l AS FOLLOWS: ' II Section I: nie Common Council of the City of Springfield does hereby recobend approval of the annexation of':the subject territories to the City by the Lane County Local Government Boundary Commission, I;ane County; Oregon, said territories being des~ribed as follows: . I' Township 17 South, Range 3 West, Section.24,'Map 31, portion of Tax L<!t 2000, said territory being included in the property more particularly descn"bed in Exhibit A of this Resolution. , . ' , ! Section 2: 'This resolution :mall take effect upon adoption by the Cornmon Council of the City of Springfield and approval by the Mayor. " , .' Section 3; 'ThJCity Council recommends that the Boundary Commission approv~1 the proposed annexation authorized by ORS 199.466 by expedited process without the study, Plfblic hearing and adoption offin,al order required by ORS 199.461. :' Section 4: The:City Manager shall <<!ward this resolution supporting the apPlican~s request to the Lane County Local Government Boundary Commission when an annexation agreement)s entered into by the City of Springfield and Daniel and Shannon Jackson (Owners) and upon receipt of evidence that the annexation ag!eement has been recorded. \, :\1 ADur lW b;the Common Council of the City of Springfield this 3rd day of December 2007 by a vote oC.-B.. for and'~ against 'i APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Springfield this 3r , ' fDecember 2:,:..7).. . " " V ~ j:1ayor ATTEST: IIdu .bUn- . City RecorderD q:",rl"['~ ~ 'D'" "liEn r.,"':r;'~f_J~L~ (.Jo! I,. f'~fu u: ,P,,~ TO FOFiFI/I \ ....)c" 'l" ._c"'"" ,) \..-1<-^' ...... DATE: \\ \ ""~ \ <:f'" OfFICE OFCIn' ATTORNEY ATTACHMENT ,. -,~. 'i , iL RESOLUTION NO. 07-57 EXHIBIT A :! FebruaIy 12, 2007 Branch.No. 06-203 , . " LEGAL DESCRIPTION ,!' ! ,FOR .Arti"lUATION r UK.t'OSES LANDS OF l?ANIEL L: AND SHAN+'iON L JAcKsON (pORTION OF TAX MAJ.i 17-03-24-31. TAX LOT 2000) .' SITUATED in mrinccrrporatedareainLmc C~mrty, Stafi: of Ore gonin the Southwest 1/4 of Section , 24, Township 17 South, Range 3 West of the Willamette Mcri4ian and dt;scribed as follows: . J . BEING a pbrtion of the lands t1mt were conveyed to Daniel L. and Sllan:ilon Batty in that certain Special Wairanty Deed that was recorded May 16, 1990 in Reell632R at Reception N:iImber 9022540 in the Official Records of Lane County, State of Oregon, s~d portion being more particularlY1described as follows: " ;1 . . . , . Co=cnGirig at a point 17.42 c~ north ofa point wheretlie Eastlinc ofthc William C. Spencer Don.a.uonLand Claim N=b~O, NotificauonNumber 3265: intersects t;he line :."~..,,..... Section , .24 and Section 25, Townsl1iP 17 South, Range 3 Westofthe WillametteMeridian;thenceNorth 89' 42' 33" West 393.00 feet and North. 00' 06' 16" West 22~.00 feet to the southwest come! of said J.aD.ds that vJere conveyed in the aboVe deed, which point lies on the existing city limits line of tlie City ofSprlI.lgfield and is the TRUE l'OINT OF BEti.LNl'l.1l'lG of the lands beingdcsl;l:ibedherein; " , , THENCE leaving said TRUE l'OINT OF BEb.1l'll'lJ.!.'1G and along said 'city limitsmie and west . line of said landS t1mt were conveyed in said deed; NORTH DO" 06' 16" WEST 900 FEET, more o! less, to an mgle point In the Urban drowthBound;uy of the City of Springfield; .l~CE,leaving said cityliniits line and said west line of said lands that were conveyed iJi said deed, NORTH 63' 35' EAST 435 1!'=l, mOf)l or less, along said Urban Growth Boundazy to an lUIgle pOint in said boundaIy1:h2.tlies on the eastJine of said lands thatwerc cU~'''JuJinsaiddced; u1J!'!'\i..;.r.,lea-r.ng said Urban GrowthBounda:ry and alQIIg said east line of said lands thatWC'e cu."""J "d in said deed, SOtJTE: 001 Q6' 24" EAST 1100 FE!IT, more or less, to the southeast CQmcr of said lands tlmI: were . , . conveyed ill the said deed; AND .l.t1.l!J.'lCE, along the south line of saidlimds that were cOIlVcyed in the said &edNORnI 89" 42'33" WEST393.00 .t'b.l:\l BE.llJ.Kl'I.ll'IGtO:the TRUE POIN'I OF BEtiJ..[u'l.u,Ga:tidCONTAINING9,OACRES.~oreorless.' . ' ~ ". . . . ATTACHM~~.l: '. -"7 ';:"--b ~.~ (2,/l{)J 7 .r REGISlEHED I PROFES, SIONA!. LAND SURVE'{.OR , ~~n-, OREBON JUlY20,1993 REXA BETZ ' " ' ~ / l--l't!. C?;>!I l'J,./~'/07 , Date Received D,EC I) :J ZOO!} Planner: BJ . ~ I . '... ,'~ .. iii I, , ~.~., , s~~~: ' "" ~Qt J! 1"'1" c:I ... 1 ' ... , ,..... ,. . :! lItW .. " .. . ~ ~ ~ -i;. r ..;;: a.t --. I, . ~ ~ ~ j~~ ' ,. ~ ~ 3 ~2 , ~~~~.,'~ . ~~~ gt)~ . . ~:. hi,~ ~ :.= ! . . , ~ ., . ': '. *:tl I . '.2" I III asl ':1 , :1 EXHIBIT B , ~ 'I L ~ If'j i 'i li ~ aNI. 9 , . E ]=~~J I ',~ i .', ....... ~ ~ ..iIII;:\'...... '_- ~~tIIi . ".... / .~.... . , _______L..- _ 18 ---ATTACHMENT 1 . " , '~ .. 3 '~ .. fs I ~ .. . i 50'- :i~ ... .... ~gon "-' March 27, 2008, LANE COUNTY LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION. 99 East Broadway Suite 400 Eugene, OR 97401-3111 (541) 682-4425 FAX (541) 682-2635 TO: !:Amy Sowa, Recorder, City of Sp~gfield FROM: :,Paula L. Taylor, Executive Officer I ' SUBJECT: .,ECSP08-16(ExpeditedProcedure) " ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO TIIECITY OF SPRlNGFIELD ' I '. ~ I ; (Jackson)' " , By this cOrreSp~ndence, let it be )mown that: ,I . i ., 1. A petitjon for annexation of territory to the City of Springfield-located in north Springfield, nqrth of Yolanda Avenue, west of 19'" Street, east of Vera Street (T17S R,D3W S24 Map 31 part of tax lot 2000)-was fileii9n Decemher 31, 2007, with the Lane County Local Government Bound'!fY Commission in aciordance with ORS 199.466 and ORS 199.490(2)(a)(A). , , 2. An analysis was prepared by ihe boundary commission staff with a recomh1endation of approval and was sent, on January 15, 2008, to the Lane boundary commission members; Lane County ,commi~sioners; Lane County Land Man~gement Division; Lane County Environmental Health Division; City of Springfield; WlIlamalane Park and Recreation District; Daniel and Shannon Jackson; and Jeanette Applauso at Branch Engineering. ' , II 3. No reqj1est for public hearing was received by 5:00 p.m., January 25, 2008.; .' : ' , . I 4. This annexation proposal, described in' attached Exhibit A and shown on attached map Exhibit B, is hereby approved and effective January 25,2008 (ORS 199.466 and ORSI1995l9). " " Please acknowledge receipt of this correspondence. ' 'I 1" . NOTE: In aC90rdance withORS 199.510(2)(c), the annexation area is hereby part of the Lane County Metropolitan ''Y a..~~" ~~_. Service District and the WiJlamaJane Park and RecIeation District Attachments cc: Daniel::and shannon Jackson WiJlamalane Palx and Recreation District " ATTACHMENT 1 - 19 . , , EXHIBIT A Beg at apt 1,149172 ft Nora pt where the Eli of the Williiun C. SpencerDLC'No. 50 intersects with the Ii betwe~n S24 and S25 T17S R03W WM; . '. ' , th N89042'33"%.393,OO ft and NOoo06' 16"W 225.00 ft mil to apt, sd ptbeingon the existing Springfield city ljmits and the TPOB; , ' th alg sd city limits NOoo06'16"W 920.00 ft mil to apt; " . th leaving sd cit~:limits Ii N63035'E 435.00 ft mil to apt; th SOoo06'24"E 1.100 ft mil to apt; :1 th N89042'33"~ 393.00 ft mil to the TPOB, all in Lane County, Oregon. /{; ~ ." LCBC:LCOG: ~1BC\LiGAL\2008lECSP0816 LGLDOC 1,.orl Saved: March.25. 2008 ECSP08-16 Page 1 of 1 ATTACHMENT 1 - 20 ;, . " .11 . Ii " EXHIBIT B '~ . ~ ~' ;.,I,!N~t being annexed I r'" " . ' . " I, I II . ::~-- - - L (',\-- liL :f.I...~d"" l r'~ w- Iii ,:-- ]i ~-! {. -.J -.(:-1, -.J: LL:. ,~~'., : il I: \ --\....- ..I..'... I r (: :I! == ,I I I I '(TY;B:ttT~:F('" .1 I \ . I . -- UGB _ Jac~s'on L-J Tax Lots City Limits spa :~- ...... .f "..' i : ~ . , ANNEXATION AREA Includes part of 11. 2000, 17-03-24-31; , 'Owned by Daniel and Shannon Jackson , _ (EC SP 08-16) I ; I I . ... .' ?" , ' .......-....- ...- . . <"1 '-;: ~ *'-1- ; (\ f .';-: .p:,,, '. q ~ ' :. 6 ~t'~. ..~.....~..._;._~;" ., '.~'- '-1'.1'. ,', " (~. ' -. . . ~-! . '~-14:' . -~ -+ . . ,': - '"Y~.9't' ,:. ---m -+- ~:I i.;,.;:...,}..' . "_.1 I't-'~,~.../ ,.... :, Tt;, r t . -, ~ . ...-..- .-<. ..-\,,< '. '11- " "'i , ' .~::) 3;1 ~OSL: ': I 'I, I I ,: ..,._.._" ... "'- -f '. . ,. 'III 'r\S=1..I,_!..): D.' "\ II f't' ''''j -,"LX '," "~.~:L ECSP08-16 . Page 1 of 1 200 0: 200 . ATTACHMENT 1 - 21 + 4~O Feet.," . Water Withdrawals Labels for Distribution List 2009 Brenda Jones DSD File Copy Cartographic Unit Oregon Department of Revenue 955 Center Street, N.E. Salem, Oregon 97310 '.." ... , Alice Marks, " Lane County Tax Assessor's Office 125 E. 8th Avenue, Eugene, pregon 97401 ' '~ Ray Meduna Spnngfie1d Utility Board PO Box 300 Springfield, Oregon 97477 .. , Northwest Natural Gas/Acct. Servo Attn: Annexation Coordmator 220 NW 2nd Street Portland, Oregon 97209' Annette Cardoza Sanipac PO Box 10928 Eugene, Oregon 97440 Brenda Jones DSD Journal Copy Annette Newingham Lane County Elections 135 E. 6th Avenue Eugene, Oregon 974001 Tim Hanley Rainbow Water District PO Box 8 Springfield, Oregon 97477 Qwest 1801 California St., Suite 2500 Denver, CO. 80202 Bob Duey Finarice Ii" Ma~a Trappen , Sprin'gtield Utility Board 202 S. 18th Street Spririgfie1d, Oregon 97477 Jeff DeFranco Spririgtield School District 525 Mill Street Springfield, Oregon 97477 ' 'I " ComCast Cable Attention: Tom Henerty 2897i:Chad Dr. Eugene, oregon 97408 , Ii