Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCorrespondence PLANNER 3/31/2009 225 FIFTH STREET. SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 . PH: (541)726-3610 . FAX: (541)726-3689 ~~..- -.- -...........-r-~'lI...":'.II J--~- J.lI"-"L'j.- ...... ;-...-,.. ~ . V CITY OF Sl .,INGFIELD, OREGON ~-~------ -- -. --.--. MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: CARTOGRAPlllC UNIT, OREGON DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE BRENDA JONI~~, PI"\NNING ADMINISTRATIVE SPECIAI.1ST if WA'llm mSTRICr WlTI IORA WAL FOR TI IIi <TIY OF SPRINGFIELD SUBJECT: DATE: 3/31/2009 cc: BOB DUEY, CrIY OF SPRINGFIELD; AI.1CE MARKS,I"\NE COUNTY T,\X AND ASSESSORS OFFICE: ANNETm NEWlNGI lAM, LANE COUN1Y ELECIlONS; MARIA 'rRAPPEN, SPRINGFIElD UTILITY BOARD; RAY ~mDUNA, SPRINGFIELD UTIIXIY BOARD; TIM IIANLEY, RAINBOWWAll,R mS-rRlcr; JEFF DEFRANCO, SPIlINGFlEID SCIIOOL D1s-rRlcr 19; NW NA TllRM, ; Q"'l~~T; TOM IIENEJrIY, COMCAST CABLE; ANNETm CARDOZA, SANIPAC. Enclosed is the paper work for one (I) water withdrawal for the City of Springfield. I have included the Springfield City Council signed Ordinance # 6239, which includes prior annexation information and exhibits. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding any information associated with this memo. Date Received MAR 3 ], 2009 Planner: BJ .,. , ORDINANCE NO. 6239 AN ORDINANCE WITHDRAWING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY KNOWN AS JACKSON, LOCATED IN THE HAYDEN BRIDGE ROAD AREA OF NORTH SPRINGFIELD, WEST OF 19'" STREET AND INCLUDING PROPERTIES OWNED BY DANIEL AND SHANNON JACKSON. THE WITHDRAWAL INVOLVES APPROXIMATELY 9 ACRES IDENTIFIED.:AS A PORTION OF TAX LOT 2000, T17S R03W S24 MAP31 AND ALSO KNOWN AS 2778 N 19" STREET; HERETOFORE ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD FROM THE RAINBOW WATER DISTRICT, WHEREAS, certain real property described below was annexed to the City of Springfield by order of Lane County Local Government Boundary. Commission under Boundary Commission Number File EC SP 08-16, effective 1/25/08, as recommended in City Planning File No. LRP2007.00009 and supported by City Council Resolution No. 07- 57 (and further described in Exhibit A & B), and WHEREAS, the property to be withdrawn is located within the boundaries of the .Rainbow Water District, and WHEREAS, the City of Springfield Common Council held a public hearing and first reading in the Springfield City Council Chambers on March 2, 2009, and a second reading and adoption on. March 16, 2009, in accordance with ORS 222.524, for the purpose of hearing any objections to the withdrawal of the property from the public service district mentioned \lnd there having been no objections raised. NOW THEREFORE THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: The Common Council of the City of Springfield do~s hereby determine that the real property described should be in the best interest of the City of Springfield withdrawn from the Rainbow Water District in Lane County, Oregon, insofar as the property is located therein. Section 2: The Common Council of the City of Springfield does hereby determine that the following described real property within the boundaries of the Rainbow Water District is and shall be withdrawn from the Rainbow Water District in Ume County, Oregon, said property being described as follows: Township 17South, Range 03West, Section 24, Map 31, that portion of Tax Lot 2000 within the Urban Growth Boundary of Springfield, as . more particularly described in Exhibit B of this ordinance, Boundary Commission File Number EC .SP 08- 16. ADOPTED by. the Common Council of the City of Springfield this 16' day of March 2009, by a vote of ~ for and 0 against. Council Pre~idenf. . . APPROVED by the-l\4e.y.Ql' of the Llty 0 Spnngf ,Id thiS 16tJday of March 2009. .. . DrMrz.-t) ~Att/f! .. ~~ Council President ATTEST: tLnvw~~ t,I"\l'~W''''. ^ r..,c.r"",.J::.ity R#rder nt"i1h:.(; ~':u (;: t>~' (~i,U\:k.J As., TO cOrcll ~ \on ",...,,,- .:.s \. ~'''''1 DATE: __::?J ~ C\ ) 0'1 . OFFICE OF Gill PJTOHliEY Date ReceiVed MAR 3 '1'2009 " Planner: BJ ExHIBIT A Fe~ 12.2007 EranCh.~o.06-203 LEGAL DESCRlYIlON FOR Am1J!...\ATIONPURPOSES , . LANDS OF l?ANIEL L..AND SB:AN!S'ON L. JACKsON (pORTION OF TAX-MAP 17-03-24-31. TAX LOT 2000) .' SITUATED in mrinCOIporated area in Lane C~unty. State of Oregon in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 24, Township 17 South, Range 3 West of the Willamette Meri4ian and desczibed as follow.;: . . .DJ!.u~G a portion of the lands that ~e conveyed to Daniel L. and ShamionEatty in that certain Special Wa..""":"l Deed that was :recorded May 16. 1990 in Reel 1632R at Reception N:imlber 9022540 in the Official Records of L:ane County, State of Oregon, said portion being more particularly described as follows: C~encing at a~int 17.42 $ins n~rth o~ a point where tiie ~ast line of the. William C. S~cer Donation Land Claim Numbel~, ~otification ~umber 3265.lI1tl:rsects the line between Section ,24 andSectian25, ToWILShip 17 South,~ge 3 West-oftheWillamctleMcridian; thence North 89' . 42' 33" West 393.00 feet and ~orth.OO 06' 16" West 22~.00 feet to the southwest comer of said lands that were conveyed in th~ aboVe deed, whiCh point lies on the existiD.g city limits line of !lie . City of Springfield and is the :J..Ku.J!, FOINT OF BEb-li'll'unG lifthell1llds beingdescn'bedherein; !.t1JW'1CE leaving said TRUE FUli~~ OF :BEG.uuu~:\ G and along said city liini:ts line and west . line of said landS that were conveyed in said deed, ~OR1H 00' 06' 16" WEST 909 FEET, more or iess. to an angle point In the Urban GrowthEound;uy of the City ofSprlngfield; TIIENCE,leaving said city limits line and said west line of said lands that were conveyed in said deed, NORm 63' 35' EAST 435 !!.t\.tlJ.. mor~ or less, along said Urban Growth Eoundazy to an angle point in said boundluythat lies on the east line of said lands that w= convcyedin said deed;J..w!.m';J!..leaving said Urban Growth Boundary and along said eastIine of said lands thatw= convcyedin said deed, SOUTIl 00' 06' 24" EAST 1100 x~ L. more or less, to the southeast comer of said lands tbat were . conveyed in the .said deed; AND THENCE, along the south line of said lands that were COIIVeyed inthesaiddecd~OR1H89' 42'33" WEST393.00r.t:\J:H RETlJRNINGto,theTRUEPullu OF BElrli'C,rur; G arid CONTAINlNG 9.0 ACRES, more or less. . Date Received. DEe 0 II 20D'} Planner: BJ . i:e-b "'-\c.t "'1 (z I W.O / REGIS'TEHED " PROFESSIONAL LArJD SURVE'[OR Zh~ OREOON JULY 20. 1 S93 REXA. BETZ " alA / /-t.<t. I:?~ f"'/~'/07 ATTACHMENT 1 - 2 . ~ "'! ... . ~~ . . B~~~ . ~ I;t ~ ~ Bi ~Q .i .. . ~~;i-I : ~:; ia ;~~ ~tJ . ~" ...... .~ :r; .~ . . ~.r 'Y ~. 1 .. i i 11.1 B & 'n . II . I EXHIBIT B. ......~ - ~i- ~~ .- .. ..... ,;' f .!! ! .. 2 -I! b', . !.~ ~ Ii ~3!]1 <e>i' . ,- I- - . I .. 3, a . ~ A ~ :1 ~, i ! ~ .-oregon . January 15,2008 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LANE COUNTY LOCAL GOVERNMEN~:BOUNDARY COMM1SSION . ' 99 East Broadway Suite 400 Eugene, OR 97401-3111 (541) 682-4425 FAX (541) 682-2635 Boundary Commission Members; Lane County Commissioners; Lane County Land Management Division; Lane County Environmental Health Division; City of Springfield; WillaiJlalane Park and Recreation District; narnel and Shannon Jackson; and Jeanette Applauso at Branch Engineering Paula L. Taylor, Executive Offi~ d-~ EC SP 08 -16 (Expedited Procedure) . -:;P~If)cL ANNEXA nON OF TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF EUB . (Jackson) Enclosed is a copy of the staff analysis for this proposal. 11 is sent to you as required by ORS 199.466. . piease read the analysis carefully. The proposal is recommended f~r annroval without a Dublic hearin!!. or further staff s~y. There are hvo alternatives: I. If you agree with this recommendation, you need do nothing. 2. ., I If you feel that a public hearing is needed, .you must request, in': writing by January 25,2008, tbat a hearing should be set. The request must be id the commission's office by 5:00 p.m., Januarv 25th. You must use the form that is provided at the end of the staff aI\alysis to request a hearing. For units of go~emment, the form . should be signed by the chairman/mayor. or other authorized: person. If you or your umtof government requests a public hearing, the boundaiy commission asks that you attend the requested public bearing. If a hearing is rhquested, it will be set for the next available boundary commission public hearing.. , . IF YOU HA VB ANY QUESTIONS REGARDlNG THE PROPOSAL OR PROCEDURE, PLEASE CONTACT OUR OFFlCE (541-682-4425). Attachments pI: LCBC: L'\B0EXPlMEMOI200MCSP0816 MEItf.DOC Last SCl'Ied: January.15, 2008 :;- ATTACHMENT 1 - 4 . Date Received MAR 7 2008 Planner: BJ ., EXPEDITED PROCEDURE - STAFF ANALYSIS LANE COUNTY LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION . . Annexation of Territorv to the Citv of Sorinmeld (Jackson) 1. BC File EC SP 08 -16 lnitiated by ResoiutiOll No. 07-57 by the City of Springfield with prop~rty owner consents Action under ORS 199.466 and 199.490(2)(a)(A) of the boundary coIl)lllission law Deemed vaiid December 31, 2007 Public bearing requests by January 25, 2008 Descriotiol1 The annexation area includes one tax lot located in north Springfield, nortb of Yolanda ~ .. . Avenue, west of 19 Street, east of Vera Street Property owners: Daniel and Shannon Jackson (277819. Sir"". Springfield) . Tax lot: part of 2000, T17S R03W S24Map 31 Acres: :!: 9.00 Estimate of existing populaJ-ion: 2 (one single-family residence) Existing laIid use: Reside"Jial, vacant, orchard I Exi.sting zoning in Lane County: LDRIUF, low-density residential willi urbanizing fringe ~~. , Applicable comprebensive plan: Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan :'Area General Plan (acknowledged August 1982 and has been subsequently amended) Existing public services to the y>vy,..;j: Police (Oregon State Police, Lane County Sheriff), schools (Springfield Scbool District 19), roads (City gf Springfield, Lane County), water (well), wastewater (onsite individual v.;astewater system).. eleCtricity (SUB) I Reason for Annexation .'! The property owners requested annexation in order to prepare Ihe 'annexation area for residential development. The Eugene-Springfield M_~vt'ulitan Area General Plan requires properties to annex in order to receive urban services. This annexation proposal was filed in accordance wiIh ORS 199.490(2)(a)(A), initiated by the city council witb consents from owners, and ORS 199.466 (expedited procedure). Before initiating the annexation, the City of Springfield received written consents from the owners consenting to tbe annexation. No other properties are included in the annexation request. The statutory requirement for an annexation to be initiated bya city council after receiving written consents frOqI owners is met. I ,; I' ORS 199.466 authorizes approval of annexations without a public hearing o~ adoption of a [mal order jf requested by the principal petitioner. Under the expedited procedure, the boundary . commissi~n executive officer .must prepare an analysis of the proposal wiupnl!)ate; ~eived LCLGBC Staff Analysis (ECSP08-J6)-January 15, 2008 Page 1 of 10 MAR . 7 2008 ATTACHMENT 1 - 5 Planner: BJ receipt. If, after 25 days from the filing date {in this case, January 25~, no Written objections are . .received from direct recipients of this staff analysis, the request is approved. However, if any direct recipient of this staff analysis does object, the proposal is scheduled' for the next regular boundary cQmmission public bearing. Direc;t recipients are the individualsieligible to request a public bearing and qre listed below under the fIrst boundary commission staridard. . The proposed annexation area includes a portion of one tax lot that is developed with One single- family residence (refer to Maps No. land 2). The owners of the property ;equested aimexation in order to prepare the annexation area for low-density residential development. The annexation area is not contiguous to the main body of the City of Sprinifield, but abuts other noncontiguous portions of the city. It is located within the acknowledged urban growtli boundary (UGB), whicb lies along the northern boundary of the annexation area. ~!The portion of this property located outside the UGB is not being annexed and will not be provided urban services. " - I The existing zoning of the. annexation area is LDRJUF, low-density reside~tial with urbanizing fringe overlay, in Lane County. It is designated low-density residential in the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan (Metro Plan).. Upon the effective date of the annexation, the annexation area will be automatically zoned LDR consistent with the low-density residential plan designation. . I . ~. . Resolution No. .07-57, unanimously approved by the Springiield city council on November 23, 2007, initiated the annexation. The city council's support for the anneXation was based on evidence that the annexation area could be provided with key urban services. As requested by the council, the annexation request was forwarded to the boundary commission. The city council reviewed the Annexation Agreement between the city and the property owners outlining the agreements between the two parties for the provision of urban seriices and financing responsibilities before supporting the annexation. The Annexation Agre~ment has been fully executed and is part of the boundary commission's record for this application. . 'I I FoIJowing is a brief analysis of each of the boundary commission standards. : Provide an. imparlial forum for resolution of local jurisdictional questions. Consider the 'effects of the boundary change on other units of governments.. ORS 199.410(1)(b) . and 199.410(3)(c) This annexation request was filed in accordance with provisions in ORS 199 and was determined to be a valid filing in. accordance with OAR 191-006 (adopted administrative rule on boundary commission filing requirements). The petitioners requested the proposal be processed using the expedited procedure. This staff analysis was sent to the following direct recipients: Lane boundary commission members, Lane County commissioners, Lane County Land Management Division, Lane County Environmental Health Division, City of Springiield, WilIamalane Park and. Recreation Distn,'ct .. ,. . Daniel and Shannon Jackson, and Jeannette Applauso at Branch Engineerinb R . d . . . ., ate ecelve LCLGBC Staff Analysis (ECSP08-16)- January 15, 2008 Page 2 of]O MAR 7 2008 ATTACHMENT 1 - 6 Planner: BJ Upon the annexation effective date, the area will be annexed automatically to the Lane County M~"vl.>vlitan Water Service District and the WiIlamalane Park and Recre~tion District [ORS 199.510(2)(c)] because the cJty is a part.of .both. these special districts:, The Lane County Metropolitan Wastewater Service District was formed to provide the financing for the regional wastewater treatment plant serving wastewater users within the cities of Euge~e and Springfield and other users witllin the urbanizable ::rea. The park district provides park and recreation services and facilities to Springfield residents. This request is consistent with this boundary corrunission .standard. Consider the orderly determination and adjustment of local governmentl:boundaries to best meet th~ 1!eeds of lAne County and Oregon. Consider alternative solutions where intergovernmental options are identified and make decisions based on the !nost effective long- range option among identified alternatives. ORS 199.410(1), 199.410(2); and 199.410(3)(a) ~~ ., The annexation .area is located within the acknowledged UGB of the Me.tro Plan and is not contiguous to the main body of the City of Springfield. . Territory within the UG)3 ultimately will be within the City of Springfield. ,Annexation of this property fulfills the policies adopted in the Metro Plan of annexing out to the~ban growth boundary.. :' . .Noncontiguous annexations are allowed by state annexation law and provided for in the Metro Plan if certain criteria are met. The Metro Plan policy for noncontiguous amiexation (policy #12. page TI-C-5) requires that noncontiguous annexations meet the following crit6ria: . I . ~ . a. The area to be annexed wm be provided urban service(s), which is (are) desired irrunediately by the residents/property owners. c b. The area to be annexed can be serviced (with a m.inimum level of services, as directed in the Metro Plan) in a timely and cost-efficient martner and is a logical extension of ihe city's service delivery system. i' I ji . c. The annexation proposlil. is accompanied bysupporl within the area -proposed fOr annexation from the owners of at least half the land area in th~ affected territory. The incremental process of annexation. causes shorr-term boundaries to be established. The acknowledged comprehensive plan in this area identifies ihe ~ity of Springfield as the unit of . government, which will provide urban services to this urbanizable area witlJin the UGB. In the long term, territory within this geographic area will be annexed to Springfield. !i This annexation is consistent with boundary cOrrunission administrative'. rule impiementing policies (I), (2), (5), and (7). which recognize annexation to an' existing. city as the preferred method of servicing urbanizable land. .Ii ' :; ib:. ~~. ATTACHMENT 1 7 Dat~ Reooved MAR 7 ZU08 Plann~ R.I LCLGBC Staff Analysis (ECSP08- ]6)- January 15,2008 Page 3 of 10 (1) This policy recognizes cities as the logical providers of url?an levels of service within urban growth boundaries when consistent with the cOlIljJrehensiYe plan. ,; (2) . , . This policy expresses the commission's preference for providing urban services through annexation to a city in order to provide urban seo/ices to urbanizable ~~ I (5) . , .. r This policy encourages provision of urban leyels of service within urban growth boundaries. (7) This policy expresses the commission's preference for anne~ation to .an existing city over all other alternatives as a means of , extending services to urbanizable lands: . Implementing policy (3) recognizes that in order to meet the long-term objectives of annexing out to an acknowledged UGB, short-term boundaries are created, which are logical within the context of the future service boundary. This proposal to annex territory to the City of Springfield is consistent with boundary commission policies and this standard. t( Make boundary commission determinations, which are consistent with ~cknowledged local comprehensive pllms. Assure an adequate quality and quantity of public 'services required in the comprehensive plan to meet existing and future growth. For major, boundary changes, there must be assurance that the proposed. unit of government is finanCially viable. ORS 199.410(1)(d), 199.410(3)(b) and (d) . The annexation area is within the Metro Plan UGB. The Metro Plan was acknowledged by the Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC) in August '1982 ~d has been subsequently amended. The Metro Plan recogrnzes annexation as the highest priority for extending the minimum range of urban services to urbanizable areas (polic~es #8 and #10, page D-C-4) and recognizes that u)timately, all temtory within the UGB will be arineXed to an existing city (policy #16, page D-C-S).. ,. j)" , 'Fhe annexation area is designated as low-density residential in the Metro Plan. Upon the effective date of the annexation, the annexation area will.be automatically rewned to LDR in the city. The anIlexation area will take advantage of urban .service delivery systems that are already in ,. place to serve this area. The following services are either aVaJlable or can be extended to. the annexation area. ., Water - Springfield UtiEty Board (SUB) will provide water service to the annexationare~ following annexation. An existing 6-inch line is located at the east end of Vera Street and is available to serve the annexation area. .' . . Dme R~ived LCLGBC Staff ~~ysis fEe SPOH6)- January 15,2008 Page 4 ofio . . ATTACHMENT 1 - 8 I\1A~ J in~ ,,-"'!" :--,:;.. ~-~. P.:.JnnAr~ 8J .i: Electricitv - SUB inilicates that it provides electric service in this general <)rea and can provide service to new development within the annexation area. Upon annexation and development, underground power will be extended to the annexation area from an existing line near the intersection of Yolanda Street and 19111 Street. . . . I Police services - The Springfield police department can provide police p~otection to the area after annexation without jeopardizing service in other parts of the city. Springfield police already provide service to nearby properties within the city.. . . Fire and emerl!encV services - The annexation area is currently without structural fire protectiori. Annexation to the city will provide these services to the developing area. The annexation area is . located within the four minute response time area of the Springfield Fire and Life Safety Fire Stations 3, 4, and 5. Development of the annexation area will be subject to all applicable Springfield development code and fire code requirements to provide adeql)atefire and life safety access and water supply.. Emergency meilical transport (ambulance) services are provided on a regional basis by SpriDgfield, Springfield, and Lane Rural Fire/Rescue to central Lane Cou~ty. The annexation area will continue to receive this service consistent with the adopted ambulance service area (ASA) plan. Mutual aid agreem'tts have been adopted by the three regional ASA proyiders to provide backup coverage for each other's jurisdictions, Parks and recreation - After annexation, the annexation area will be williin the Willamalane Park and Recreation District boundary. City resideT;lts receive park and recreation services from the district. The ilistrict operates two aquatic centers, a community center, an adult activity center, and 3 J parks containing a variety of outdoor recreational amenities. The dosest park to the site is Royal Delle, a 2.76-acre neighborhood park at 401 Blackstone. street. Other. nearby recreational Vl'l'v, ~Jnities include harvest Landing and page Park. Schools - Springfield School District ] 9 serves this area. Existing schools-Yolanda elementary, Briggs middle, and Springfield high-serve this neighborhood arid can a~~v....~odate students resulting from new development occurring within the annexation irr+a. , " . I' Wastewater - Springfield staff indiCates a public wastewater system:: is currently under construction and .'includes a new lift station located in the annexation area. Future site development will be served from this lift station upon acceptance by the city eouncil.(expected by May 2008). As a part of the system construction, a IS-inch diameter waStewater main will be extended from the lift station to the existing westerly right-of-way of 19th Street. The Annexation Agreement requires the applicant to extend the ] 5-inch line along 19th Street and the Hayden Bridge Stub prior to the street construction. The public system as ~onstructed will have sufficient capacity and sufficient depth to serve the annexation area: The applicant is required to construct a public gravity wastewater system to serve tbe annexation area, as needed, in addition to the 15-inch wastewater main described above. :, " . Dato Rec~ivad : MArl . ~ 70G8 plAnnaro' D I ! i Stonnwater - Springfield staff indicates an existing 18-inchpublic storrDwater management system is located adjacent to the west line of the annexation area, approxima\ely 240 feet north of the centerline of Vera Street. Another existing 12-inch public stonnwater mimagement system is located adjacent to the west line of the annexation area, approximately 170 feet south of the centerline of Vera Street. The applicant will be allowed to connect to eitlier or both of these existing public stormwater management systems, but will be required to provide pre-treatment for 100 percent of newly paved surfaces, using such methods as double chambered catch basins with oil filtration media or a water quality manhole. Additionally, a minimum of 50 percent of the non-building rooftop runoff impervious. surfaces on the annexation ai-ea shall be treated vegetatively, using methods such as a bioswale. The applicant wjll be required to mainta.in the post-developed runoff rate of flow equal to or below the pre-development rate of flow. The city granls development approval only where adequate public and/or private stormwater management system provisions have been made as determined by the public works director, consistent with the citfs Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual. < . Streets - Springfield staff indicates the annexation area has frontage on 19th Street which is under the jurisdiction of Lane County. Along this frontage, 1911> Street is not impr~ved. The section of 1911> Street right-of-way north of Yolanda Street is a local access road (LAR) which does not receive county maintenance. On this section of 19th Street, the travel way is an unimproved gravel surface, approximately 12,feet wide. Such a surface is not adequate to accommodate . additional traffic that would be arl\icipated from the applicants' proposed dev,~lopment, and is not adequate to meet fire and life safety department needs. 19th Street is designated as a collector street in Springfield's Conceptual Street Map. The applicants are required to dedicate land adjacent to the westerly line of the existing right-of-way sufficient to construct a fully-improved 2/3 width colle~tor street (compldte with gutter, curb, pavement, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees) along the 19th Street frontage of the annexation area. The applicants are required to dedicate a right-of-way of, 60 feet through the annexation area to facilitate the east-west connection of 19th Street with the ,existing Vera Street right-of-way and pavement and to construct the easterly extension of Vera Street to an urban standard from the west line of.the annexation area to 19th Street (complete with gutter, curb, pavement, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees). .The applicants are required to provide for an improved secondary access to the annexation area via either the extension of 19'h Street to Yolanda Avenue or the improvement of Hayden Bridge Stub from 19th Stre~t and easterly to the , , existing improved pavement. Further street/transportation requirements are outlined within the annexation agreement between the applicants and the city. ' Solid waste manal!erri~nt - Privaie firms and individuals collect and transp6rt solid waste to the Lane County administered landfill. . ~ommunication facilities - Various providers offer both wire and wireless communication serviceS in the Springfield-Springfield metropolitan area. Existing providers and those entering the market have. the capability to provide service to this area. . ~ ATTACHMENT 1 -1 Q Date :Received MAR 1 2008 PblnnAr~ R.I LCLGBC Staff Analysis (ECSP08-l6)- Jamiary 15,2008 Page 6 of 10 . . :-::~. r~. Land use controls - The annexation area is within Springfield's portion.6f the urban growth boundary. Through an intergovernmental agreement between Lane Couryty and the City of Springfield, the city already has planning and building jurisdiction for thi~ p,up~aj. The city will continue to administer land use controls after annexation. " ' The minimum level of required services are either immediately available :;or can be provided within a reasonable future time frame as needed. This request is consistent with boundary . commission policies and this standard. Consider the comprehensive plan's economic, demographic, and soci6logical trends and projections and its environmental policies, pertinent to the proposal. ORS 199.410(3)(d) and 199.462(1) i The annexation proposal is consistent with the Metro Plan, as it is an 'incremental step in implementing the long-range plan for this area. .The UGB, land uses, and ~oJicies in the Metro Plan were developed to meet the future needs of the metropolitan community. The proposed use is consistent with the long-range plans for the area. ., Ii .' . This proposed annexation is consistent with this.boundary commission standard. " Recommendation Iii I ,. The boundary commission staff recommends that the proposed annexa!ion to the City. of Springfield (BC File EC SP 08 - 16) be approved without the hearing and staff report as required by ORS 199.466. ]f a public hearing is requested, the proposal will be heard at the next:' available boundary commission public hearing. ]f none is requested it will be approved and effe~tive January 25, 2008 (ORS 199.466 and ORS 199.519). . ### . , o Date Received iilAR1Z1l1l11 , , . ~: LCLGBC Staff Analysis (ECSP08.-IIS)- January 15, 2008 . Page 7 of 10 ~Ianner: BJ ATTACHMENT 1 -11 Sign and retumthisform to the boundary commission office ONLYifyou d~sire that a public hearing be held. Office: 99 East Broadway, Suite 400, Eugene, Oregoh 97401-3111 II Pursuant to ORS 199.466, I REQUEST TIlAT A PUBLIC HEARING and STAFF STUDY be conducted on an annexation of territory to the City of Springfield;(EC SP 08 - I p), as . . ". required by ORS 199.461. TIns form must be filed in the commission offi~e no later than 5:o<i I, p.m., Januarv 25.2008. Reason for public hearing: Date Signature Title Irr. Representing Note: If you or your agency requests a publii:.heariIig, the commission ask~ that you attend the requested hearing. pI: LCBC: ~\BC\FXPI200IMCSP0816 m.DoC LaSI Sayed: January J 5. 2008 .j: ATTACHMENT 1 -12 Date ReCeived MAR 7 20ntl 'Planner: BJ LP.OBC S.~af[ Analysis (ECSPOB-16)-January 15.2008 Page 8 of]O i. ~ No.1. Vll..Jl'U J I MAP AnneXation 10 Springfield (Jackson) ECsP08-16 GENERAL LOCATION OF . ANNExA nON AREA a ackson} (Ee SP 08-16) .' , . - . !I i J ( 0.4 o 0.4 0.8 Miles I UGB _ Jackson City streets Arterial, major:' Arterial, minor!: City Limits . ..SPR N w~. . ._" A.- Date Received MAR 7 2008 Planner: BJ. i, I: I' LCLGBC Staff Analysis (ECSPOB-l6)- January 15, 2008 Page 9 of 10 ATTACHMENT 1 - 13 MAP1IN? 2 SITE MAP Ann~abon 10 Springfield (Jackson) ECSP08-16 ~- ~.~~. : ..r- . .~ -------- I,. / ~ , '=~ r - ,. - , ANNEXATION AREA Includes part of TL 2000, 17-03-24-31; . Owned by Daniel and Sharman Jackson (Ee SP 08 -16} " . i."." ~ Notbeirg annexed I V I" , I' ,I '. ~ .L (\- IF~ , '- I-l....~d"" EI~'O')<.. Qx I L ---~ t .iJ). J '::~\~~.~L...". -J; L( r . .'~~ ~. .. .. ;r<J= I, ..:.. '. ,::~'_- i:b . . . . . --. - ~; : .,".., '..';:, ! ,.~; : -:- . . - : t-H ..;... ;i .:" ! . . -. '71 ',...:,'.'/';'. . ; ~_ :. ''''.' _'.. t" i I f-- _.._.~,_D':~8l:__~-nL I. ; .I~ -- ..'-\~_ .=-~ ..I '~ I H-L F," --.. "-. f'; u....(tj':'d= i L : i I 'I 1\ I Tfi' ~--.J' -- 1:'1 ...--- . I . ' 'R . d - - UGB Date ecelve _ Jackson MAR ' 7 2008 LJ T ~ Lots City Limits SPR ;i'i' Ii I. :.,. N + .... " i..... Planner: BJ . . ~9-GBC Staff Analysis (ECSP08-16)-January 15,2008 .Page'mof1'O":~ .~ . . '. c"":'.' . . ATTACHMENT 1 -14 200 0" 200 400 Feet ,. f , RESOLUTION NO 07-57 , A RESOLUTION INITIATING ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORy TO THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD AND REQUESTING THAT THE LANE COUNTY LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION APPROVE THE ANNEXATION BY EXPEDITED PROCESS. I' ,. WHEREAS, the City received an application to annex approximately 9 acres into !pe City of Springfield on February 27, 2007, said territory being described as follows; I Township 17 South, Range 3 West, Section 24, Map 31, portion of Tax Lot 2000 as more particularly described in Exhibit A of this Resolution. WHEREAS, the t~u :~u, j to be annexed is within the Eugene-SpriIigfi.eldUrban .Gr'owth Boundary, and is proximate to the City limits; and, ,. ,. WHEREAS, the City Council is authorized by ORS 199.490(2)(aXA) to initiate annexation upon receiving consent in writing from a majority of the electors registered in the territory. proposed to be annexed and written consent from more than half of the owners of land in the territory proposed to be annexed, who also own more than half of the land in the territory proposed to be annexed and of real property therein representing more than half of the assessed value of all real property in the territory proposed to be annexed; and,' " , WHEREAS, the property owners <(te certain. territory described in Exhibit A sigj1ed a consent to annex (Exhibit C); and, . ... , . WHEREAS, two registered voters reside within the'.~u;~u.j and have signed a consent to annex (Exhibit q~ i " I WHEREAS, the City Council is authorized by Springfield Development Code 6.03"D(2)(a) and ORS 222: 111 and other applicable Oregon Reviscd Statutes to initiate annexation when the territory in the . annexation proposal can be provided with the minimum level of key urban facilitie~ and services in an orderly and effident manner as defmed in Eugene-Springfield Metro Area Genera~Plan Metro Plan Policies B.a and b, Page rr-C-4; and where there will be a logical area and time within which to deliver urban services and facilities; and . . , . , WHEREAS, minimum level key urban facilities and services are defined in the Eugene-Springfield Meti-o Area General Plan, page Y-3 as wastewater service, st9rmwater service, solid waste.management, water service, fire and emergency medical services, police protection, dty-wide parks ana recreation programs, electric service, land use controls, communications facilities and services, and public schools on a district- wide hasis; and ' WHEREAS, the territory proposed to be annexed can be immediately provided with a minimum level of key urban facilities and.services with the exception of public sanitary sewer service, public stOllI1water management service and street improvements, which are being provided for in an Annexation Agreement which has been negotiated with City staff and the Owners, as described in Attachment 2: Informational Attachment, Case Number LRP2007-00009 and Attachment 4: Annexation Ag~eement; and . ~ WHEREAS, an annexation agreement has been proposed for execution by the Citi of Springfield and Daniel and Shannon Jackson; (Owners) which will memorialize the Owner's commitment, agreement and obligation to meet the City's requirements for provision of the minimum level ofk~y urban services as required for an affmnative City recommendation for the annexation request; and . ATTACHMENT 1 -15 WHEREAS, the City Manager is authorized to forward this resolution supporting t)1e applicant's request to the Lane County Local Government BOWldary Commission when an annexation agreement is entered mto by the City of Springfield and Daniel and Shannon Jackson; (Owners); and I WHEREAS, the City Manager is authorized to forward this' resolution supportmg the applicant's request for expedited proeessmg to the Lane County Local Government Boundary Commi~sion. II NOW THEREFORE BASED ON TIlE FOREGOING RECITALS, TIlE COMMON COUNCJL OF TIlE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DOES RESOL VB AS FOLLOWS: : Section 1, The Common Council of the City of Springfield does hereby recom,mend approval of the annexation of the subject territories to the City by the Lane County Local Gv' ~..=ent Boundary Commission, Lane County, Oregon, said territories bemg described as follows: I, . I! Township 17 South, Range 3 West, Section.24, Map 31, portion of Tax LOt 2000, said territory being included in the property more particularly described in Exhibit A of , this Resolution. ., Section 2: This resolution shall take effect upon adoption by the Common Council ofthe City of i, Springfield and approval by the Mayor. :' II Section 3: The City Council recommends that the Boundary Commission approve;the proposed . annexation authorized by ORS 199.466 by expedited process without the study, p~blic bearing and adoption offinal order required by ORS 199.461. Section 4: The City Manager shall ffiiward this resolution supporting the applicant's request to the Lane County Local Government Boundary Commission when an annexation agreementis entered into by the City of Springfield and Daniel and Shannon Jackson (Owners) and upon receipt of evidence that the annexation agreement has been recorded. . ~I I. . I ADvr 1 ClJ by the Common Council of the City of Springfield this 3rd day ofDecpmber 2007 by a vote of ~ for and ....Q against., APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Springfield this 3r rn_:7P ,MR.' yor 1'1 . I. ATTEST: flnLI ~ . CityReconierO '."''''. r,."." " [ !}p.r,t\lII:'!\ r-,~f,'~i_Jt t:,W,; t.:.t ~. ."h.U\l t.u ps,:o~Jir~ ~'''''' . D^TE:_nh~ I,"", OFFICE orClff ATTORNEY ATTACHMENT" -16. RESOLUTION NO. 07-57 EXHIBIT A - FebruaIy 12, 2007 Branch No. 06-203 " LEGAL DESCRll'TlON . FOR ~TIONl'URPOSES LANDS OF:QANIEL 1" AND ~ONL JACKSON (l'ORTION OF TAX MAP 17-03-24-31. TAX LOT ~OOO) .. I . SITUATED in unincoxporated llIeainLane C~unty, State of Oregon in th~ ~out:hwest 1/4 of~ection 24, Township 17 South, Range 3 West of the WillamctteMeri4ian and descnced as follows: ii . ! BEING a portion of the lands that ~e convcyedto Daniel L. and ShmmonBatty in that certain Special Wainnty Deed that was recorded May 16, 1990 in Reel 1632R at Reception NjImber 9022540 in the Official Records of Lane County, State of Oregon, said portion being more " particulllIly described as follOV(S: '. II .i I I '. Commencing at a point 17.42 $!ins north of a poUrt where t1i.e East line ofthc William C. Spencer Donation Land Claim Nmnbd~O, Notification Number 3265, Urtersects tlle line between Section .24 and Section 25, Township 17 So~~ge3 West-ofthe WillametteMcIidian;thcnceNorth89' ' 42' 33" West 393.00 feet and North 00 06' 16" West 22~.00 feet to the southwest c=r of said lands that were conveyed in the aboVe deed, which point lies on the existing city limitS line of tlic City of Springfield and is.the TRUE l'u.u.\ .L OFBEl.:rll"U'UJ.' G of the lands b~gdescncedherein; Ii I ,. . THENCE leavml7 said TRUE POINT OF BEl.:rll"lJ."I11"lG and along said City limi1liline and west ' = & line of said landS that were conveyed in said deed, NORlH DO' 06' 16" WEST 900 FEET more or . . . ,. '" .I less, to an angle poUrt In the Urban GrowthBound;uy of the City of Springfield; HI:.I!J.'\ LJ!;, leAVing said city limits line and said Wllst line of said lands that were conveyed in 'said deed, NORTH 63' 35' EAST 435 i'.I:\J:H, mol'J: or less, along said Urban Growth Boundary to an ariglc point in said boundaIythatlies on the east line of said lands that were conveyedin said deed; uam....I!., leavl.ng said Urbl!D- Growth Boundary and along said east line of said lands that WCf\l Cw.< hJ ~J in said deed, somoo' 06' 24"EASl' 1100 FEaT, more or less, to the southeast come.i:ofsaidlands tbatwcrc . c"...., ~ J' we: in the said deed; AND ~.DJW.' CE, along the south line of said lands that were conveyed in the said deed NORTH 89' 42' 33" WEST 393.00 .r=.l. RETIlRNINGtc;,the TRUE POINT OF BEtiI.!"IJ."Im G arid CONTAINING 9.0 ACRES, more or less. . , ". . . . ATTACHMENT 1 - 17 ';:"--b o"\A.c. ":'1 (z, J 7.{)] 7 " REGISTERED ' PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR J?h~. OREOON JULY 20, 1993 REXk BETZ . .. B1fl ~ i-l"i!. 0/1'" ''1-/.,';07 . Ii . Date Received . D.EC I) :J 200!F Planner: BJ .. .~ ... j' .. )> -I -I )> n ~ :I: :;: I........... . m Z -I ..... .1 .... CO . .. ., Ii ' '\\ .- , \ , , ____ _.on ___ ________ ~~__ ~ _ __ ___... ._._ __ ____..____.__..__n_......__ _,_.__ _._,_ _ ____ .r. MV'.. .... ._' _ J. ... rat1"Dil tJII rAJI LOT moo I .iHIU. ro BI' .&..1,....-... 07 ftD' JACKSON PROPERTY N", 1/4. B", 1/4. DC, lU. 2',178,. R.D',~ r.Jt LI.NB CO~....I. tJBmON .l'JfBRU~ al. 8fJIJ'1 BCl.U 1" . 8fJIJ' " , -- ----'.,- - - --- - ~... -.-.~-" .~ --..~ .--.-. ---- '-~'-._'~ ---- '\\ \. (a::=.). .. ~Jl:rID. Ilh EnJln..rfDlI'. lao. ~11I'~ I ....:;<?'=- J ~-~ (':f:!:..:.~1' ~"WlIY 1lhG.~.~......a&I_............. l'114B:r M:I. ~DJ - . m 'X II - m - -I OJ .- lJr~gon LANE COUNTY LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION t. , 99 East Broadway . Suite 400 Eugene, OR 97401.3111 (541) 682-4425 FAX (541) 682-2635 March 27, 2008 TO: Amy Sowa, Recorder, City of Sp~gfield FROM: Paula L. Taylor, Executive Officer " SUBJECT: . EC SP 08 - 16 (Expedited Procedure) . I, Am,LAATION OF TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF SPRlNGFIELD (Jackson) " , By this correSpondence, let it be known that: " Ii A petition for annexation of territory to the City of Springfield-located in north Springfield, north of Yolanda Avenue, west of 19'" Street, east of Vera Street (1'17S R03W S24 Map 31 part of tax lot 2000}-was filect;~Jn December 31, 2007, with tbe Lane Cou~ty Lo<:aI Government Boundary Commission in actordance with ORS 199.466 and ORS 199.490(2)(a)(A). - ~ 2. An analysis was prepared by the boundary commission staff with a recvu";'u~udation of approval and was sent, on Jannary IS, 2008, to the Lane boundary commission n)embers; Lane County commissioners; Lane County Land Management Division; Lane County Environmental Health Division; City of Springfield; Willamalane Park and Recreation District; Daniel and Shannon Jackson; and Jeanette Applauso at Branch Engineering. I . Ii 3. No request for public hearing was received by 5:00 p.m" January 25, 2008.;, I' 4. This annexation proposal, described hi attached Exhibit A .and shown on attached map Exhibit B, is hereby approved and effective January 25, 2008 (ORS 199.466 andORS1199.519). 1. Please acknowledge receipt of this correspondence. . I I: NOTE: In accordance withORS 199.51O(2)(c), the annexation area is hereby part of the Lane County Metropolitan Wastewater Service District and the Willarnalane Parle and Recreation District Attachments cc: Daniel and Shannon Jackson Willarnalane Park and Recreation District ATTACHMENT 1 - 19 fXHIBIT A Beg at a'pt 1,149.72 ft N of a pt where the Eli of the William C. SpencerDLC!No. 50 intersects with the Ii between S24 and S25 Tl7S R03W WM; ! th N89042'33"W 393.00 ft and NOoo06' 16"W 225.00 ft mil to apt, sd pt being'D,n the existing Springfield city limits and the TPOB; . th alg sd city Jim.its NOoo06' 16"W 920.00 ft mil to apt; th leaving sd city lim.its Ii N63035'E 435.00 ft mil to apt; th SOoo06 'Z4"E 1,1 00 ft mil to apt; th N8904Z'33"W 393.00 ft mil to the TPOB, all in Lane County, Oregon. I(; i LCBC:LCOG: I.,IBClLEGALI200/ilECSP08/6 LGLDOC !"ost Savtd: March 25. 2008 . " i: !; ECSP08-16 Page,1 of I ATTACHMENT 1 - 20 ~- EXHIBIT B ~ -- ..-/ _ -v-- . . ----- y..... . 'c . l . I J !~ . j: ~I - - L / (\ ! I 1'- 1: I !- \.l....~d"" E/""d1<- ,~ II I I I : ~-j . I ;-~. .~~ .~. <'~ -.1 . -,\.\- - ..1 J II'{ i ::=- . ...... . I 1:1 I, I, jj 'I"'l'i"'~ui--J'" --FI-=~ -- - UGB _ Jackson L-J TaxI Lots' City Limits . SPR , ,..... .f' ,,"." ~ , ANNEXATION AREA Includes part ofTL 2000, 17-03-24-31' . Owned by Daniel and Shannon Jacks~n _ (EC SP 08-16) I ; I I o<F . I I I-' Q) ~, Ii ~OSE~-I)~ I . .... \lllc).::~..I...I.): ] ,,'.,'" f. Lj '1- (}\=:= : L ECSP08-16 . Page 1 of 1 ATTACHMENT 1 - 21 200 r O:! 200 .- N + 400 Feet , ..,