HomeMy WebLinkAboutAIS PLANNER 3/16/2009
~;;tl. '
'.
Meeting Date:
Meeting Type:
Department:
Staff Contact:
Staff Phone No:
Estimated Time: ::
March 16, 2009
Regular Meeting
Development Services
Jim Donovan
726-3660
Consent Calendar
AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
SPRINGFIELD
CITY COUNCIL
ITEM TITLE:
ACTION
REQUESTED:
ISSUE
STATEMENT:
ATTACHMENTS:
DISCUSSIONI
FINANCIAL
IMPACT:
i>
RAINBOW WATER DISTRICT WITHDRAWAL EC SP 68-16, JOURNAL
NUMBER LRP2007-00009 (JACKSON) ::
,
.Counci1 is requested to conduct a second reading and adoptlI;lot adopt the attached
ordinance: AN ORDINANCE WITHDRAWING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY KNOWN
AS JACKSON, LOCATED IN THE HAYDEN BRIDGE ROAD AREA OF NORTH
SPRiNGFIELD, WEST OF 19'" STREET AND INCLUDING PROPERTIES OWNED BY
DANIEL AND SHANNON JACKSON. THE WITHDRAWAL INVOL YES
APPROXIMATELY 9 ACRES IDEN 1ll' J..t\v AS A PORTION OF;TAX L0T2000, Tl7S
R03W S24 MAP31 AND ALSO KNOWN AS 2778 N 19'" STREET; HERETOFORE
. ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD FROM THE RAINBOW WATER
,
DISTRICT. :
~:
Ii
Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS 222.520) require that o.<<u;w;j located in the
Rainbow Water District, which is annexed to the City of Springfield, be withdra~
. from .that district to prevent double taxation. ORS requires withdrawal prior to
March 31" of each calendar year. The owner requested annexation and City water
services in order ~o develo? the property.for urban use. The sUbjec7;>f1 ,.~erty was
annexed to the City of Spnngfield effeclive on January 25, 2008. ,~.;' .
. ' ~, '.~l
. I, cT...,..
.. 't"
Attachment 1: Ordinance with Legal Description and Maps', -Boundary
Commission Staff Report, City CounCil Resolution and Notices of Annexation
Adoption . . II
II
Legal notice was published in the Register Guard Newspapbr' as required by ORS
222.520 and notices were posted in four public places. cityb>unci! conducted a
public hearing and first reading of the ordinance on March 2,2009. Adoption will
result in the withdrawal of the property from the Rainbow Water taxing diStrict and
prevent double taxation.' .
pate ReceiVed
MAR '1 6."2009
Planner: BJ.
~ .
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE WITHDRAWING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY KNOWN AS JACKSON,
LOCATED INTHE HAYDEN BRIDGE ROAD AREA OF NORTH SPRINGFIELD, WEST OF 19th
'STREET AND INCLUDING PROPERTIES OWNED DANIEL AND SHANNON ;JACKSON. THE
WITHDRAWAL INVOVL YES APPROXIMATELY 9 ACRES IDENTIFIED AS A PORTION OF TAX
LOT 2000, T17S R03W S24 MAP31 AND ALSO KNOWN AS 2n8 N 19th STREET;
HERETOFORE ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD FROM THE, RAINBOW WATER
- ~
DISTRICT. .. .
Ii
"
WHEREAS, certain real property described below was annexed to th~ City of Springfield
by order of Lane County Local Govemment Boundary Commission under Boundary Commission
Number File EC SP 08-16, effective 1/25108, as recommended in City Planning Rle No.
LRP2007-00009 and supported by City Council Resolution No. 07- 57 (and further described in
. Exhibit A & B), and ':
. ~
"
WHEREAS, the property to be withdrawn is located within the boundarjes of the Rainbow
Water District, and '
WHEREAS, the City of Springfield Common Council held a public hearing and first reading
in the Springfield City Council Chambers on March 2, 2009, and a second reading and adoption
on March 16, 2009, in accordance with ORS 222.524, for the purpose of hearing any objections to
the withdrawal of the property from the public service district mentioned and there having been no
objections raised. ". '.. " . .
i~
NOW THEREFORE THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DOES DRDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1: The Common Council of the City of Springfield does hereby deterT.nine that the
real property described should be in the best interest of the City of Springfield Withdrawn from the
Rainbow Water District in Lane County, Oregon, insofar as the property is located therein.
Section 2: The Common Council of the City of Springfield does hereby,determine that the
following described real property within the boundaries of the Rainbow Water District is and shall
be withdrawn from the Rainbow Water District in Lane County, Oregon, s'aid property being
described as follows: Township 17South, Range 03West, Section 24, Map 31: that portion of Tax
Lot 2000 within the Urban Growth Boundary of Springfield, as more particula'r1y described in
Exhibit B of this ordinance, Boundary Commission File Number EC SP 08-16.;
Ii
ADOPTED by the Common Council of the City of Springfield this 16h day of March 2009,
by a vote of . for and against . . ,Ii.
. ,
APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Springfield this _ day of Mirch 2009.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Recorder
"
I'
"
ATTACHMENT 1 -1'
Date Received'
I . '.
, MAR 'I ~ 2009
I'
Planner:' BJ
EXHIBIT A
.,
-
Felmmy 12, 2007
BrRnCh.~o.06-203
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
FOR
ANNEXATIONl'URPOSES
.' . ,
LANDS OF l?ANIEL L AND ~ONL JACKSON
(pORTION OF TAX MAP 17-03-24-31. TAX LOT 2000)
:'
. Ii
SITUATED in umncoiporated areainLane C~UIItY, State ofCregonin the S~west 1/4 of'~ection
24, Township 17 South, Rarige 3 West of the Willamette MericUan and described as follows:
. .. .
.1i
n.llli'l G a portion of the hinds that ~c conveyed to Daniel L. and Shannon Batty in that certain
Special Wa......='J Deed that was recorded May 16, 1990 in Ree11632Rat Reception N:iImber
9022540 in the Official Records of Lane County, State of Oregon, said portion being more
. I
particularly described as follows: "
.'
. , .
Co=encing at a point 17.42 cJ:ains northofa point where tli.e East line ofllie WLlliaJ;n C. Spencer
Donation Land Claim N~, ~otification ~uInber 3265, intersects th~ line between Section .
,24 and Section 25, Township 17 South, lUnge 3 West1Jfthe WillamctteMeridian; thence North 89~ .
42' 33" West 393.00 feet and ~orth.oo' 06' 16" West 22~.00 fectto the southwest comer ofsldd .
lands thai were conveyed in the aboVe deed, ~bich point lies on the existing city limits line of tile
City of Springfield and iSthe TRUE FUll' ~ QFBEGINNING of the lands ~eingdcscnbedherein;
. i. .
U1J!J.'j \...i leaving said TRUE FUll \~ OF BEG.u"lJ."I.1J.' G and along said city limits line and west
line of said landS that were conveyed in said deed, NORlH DO' 06' 16" WEST 909 FEET, more or
iess, to an angle point mthe Urban GrowthBoUIld?xy of the City of Springfield; ~CE,leaving
said city limits line and said west line of said lands that were conveyed in saicideed, NOR'IH 63'
35' EAST 435 .t'J:~J::\l, mor!, or less, along said Urban Growth BoUIldaxy tojan angle point in said
boUIldaIy that lies on the east lini: of said lands that Were conveyed ill said deed; .l.nJ!.l'W!.,leHVing
Said Urban GrowthBoUIldaIy and alQng said cast line of said lands that were ~onveycd in said deed,
SOUTH DO' 06' 24" EAST 1100 PEPT, more or less, to the soUtheast comer'ofsaidlands that were
...=.~jedinthe'said deed; AND .l.w!.U."ICE, along the soUth line of said lanas that were conveyed
inthe saiddeedNOR1H89" 42'33" WEST 393.oo.t',t!.JH J:U!..l u.KNINGto,iheTRUEPu.uu OF
BEbJ.l.'(l'U.N G arid CONTAlNING 9.0 ACRES, mOre or less. ' !.
ATTACHMENT 1- 2
'~~...J, (ZJ u.v7
~ REGl5lERED' ,
PROFESSIONAL
c LAtjD SURVE'(OR
~y/, - - ./,,' j
~ c.c,;' /
oRmaN
JULY 20. 1 B93
REXJ\,BETZ
\. ~ ./
I-c"(: ~r' 1"'1"'/07
I.
i'
Date Received
~EC l) 3 100,/
Planner: BJ
4 . ";4
'Iii
~a:.
I E-t"
Ria ~~
tI Q.i ~ ~ fi-
1 ,,0':~~1
~.~~ -.-
~ ~ ~ I ~~
=.0 ~~ia
I~~;~~
. i'ltJ~
~....~
;:"It"
.......
~
:e:
-+-.r
,
-~-
.,
.II!
. ~ !
. :I'
. II
EXHIBIT 8 . .
. i
d' f
.a !
~'~:' J
m. ~ Jill
a~,: .11
1~MI -
.l>. .
I:. .~' i ,
I, .
1: _-..
' i i
:. . II~ ,Ii ~
:~ ; if)
" :;d _
..~ -
,;,..
I: '
,\,
. ,
......~;'":
... ~~
......
,I
I
...
'3
a
"
i
'..
I
l
a
.
-oregon
LANE COUNTY LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION
99 East Broadway
Suite 400
Eugene, OR 97401-3111
(541) 682-4425
fAX (54J) 682-2635
- January IS, 2008
TO: . Boundary Commission Members; Lane County Commissioners; Lane County
Land Management Division; Lane County Environmental Health'Division; City of
Springfield; WilIainalane Park and Recreation District; . Daniel and Shannon
Jackson; and Jeanette App1auso at Branch Engineering ,i
,
FROM: PaulaL. Taylor, Executive Offi~d-~
SUBJECT: EC SP 08-16 (Expedited Procedure) .', -:;pi-,it4flvcL
ANNEXA TlONOF TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF EUB~ (Jackson)
. . .
I'
'I(
,Enclosed is a copy of the staff analysis for this proposal. It is sent to you as!,required by ORS
199.466. 'Please read the analysis carefully. The proposal is recommended foiannroval without
~ nublic hearing or further staffstttfY. ' Ii
There are two alternatives:
1.. If you agree with this recommendation, you need do nothing.
:.
2. If you feel that a public hearing is needed, 'you must request, in ..t.riting by January
25, 2008, that a hearing should be set. The request must be in 'the commission's
. office by 5:00 p.m., Januarv 25m. You must use the form that ,Is proVIded at the
end of the' staff an,a1ysis to request a hearing. For units of govemment"the form
_should be signed by the chairman/mayor or other authorized person. If you or
your U1ufof g';veriunen! requests a public hearing, the boundary; cominission asks
that you attend the requested public hearing. If a hearing is requested, it will be
set for the next available bo~dary commission public hearing. Ii
IF YOU HAYEANY QUESTIONS. REGARDING THE PROPOSAL OR PROcEDURE,
PLEASE CONTACT OUR OFFICE (541-682-4425). I
Atlachmcnts
pI: LCBC: /.:IBCIEXF'oMEMOI2D08\ECSPOB16 MEM.DOC
Last StIJlf!d: Jafl/I./JT)I / J, 2008 .
ATTACHMENT 1 - 4
. Qate Received
MAR72Ol18
Rlanner: 'BJ
EXPEDITED PROCEDURE - STAFF ANALYSIS
LANE COUNTY LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION
Annexation of Territorv to the City of SnriOlmeld (Jackson)
1.
BC File ECSP 08 -16 .~. .
Initiated by Resoiution No. 07-57 by the City of Springfield with propek owner consents
Action under ORS 199.466 and 199.490(2)(a)(A) of the boundary comrinssion law
, , I
Deemed valid December 31, 2007 I'
Public hearing requests by January 25, 2008
Descrintion
The annexation area includes one tax lot located.in north Springfield! north of Yolanda
th .
. Avenue, west of 19 Street, east of Vera Street
Propertyowners: Daniel and Shannon Jackson (277819. Street, Springfield)
Tax lot: pait of 2000, T17S R03W S24 Map 31
Acres: :t 9.00
Estimate of existing population: 2 (one single-family residence)
Existing land use: Reside~aI, vacant, orchard . I:
Existing zoning in Lane County: LDRlUF, low-density residential with urbanizing fringe
. . ,
. ~~ '
Applicable comprehensive plan: Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan +rea General Plan
. (acknowledged August 1982 and has been subsequently ameild~d) .'
Existing public services to the ,t'.u,t'".;j: Police (Oregon Slate Police, Lane County
Sheriff), schools (Springfield School District I 9), roads (City of Springfield, Lane
County), water (well), wastewater (onsite individual w~tewater system)..
eleciricity (SUB) ,
Reason for Annexation l'
The ,t"U,t'''''j owners requested annexation in order to prepare the annexation area for
residential development. The Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan
requires y.vy':'. ";es to annex in nrder to receive uibari services; I:
I! '
. . f.
This annexation proposal was filed in accordance with ORS 199.490(2)(a)(-<}), initiated by the
city council with cOns.ents from owners, and ORS 199.466 (expedited procedure). Before
initiating the annexation, the City of Springfield received written consentS from the oWners
. . , 'I -
consenting to the annexation.. No other properties are'incIuded in the annexation request. The
statutory requirement for an annexation to be initiated by.a city council after receiving written
consents from owners is met. (i
'f: .
ORS 199.466 authorizes approval of annexations without a public hearing o;';adoption of'a final
, . I
order if requested by the principal petitioner. Under th~ expedited procelIure,the boundary ,
commissi~n exe,cutive officer.must prepare an analysis of the proposal withfJ})ate1 ReCeived
ATTACHMENT 1 - 5
MAR . 7 2008
Planner: BJ
LCLGBC Staff Analysis (ECSPOB-I6)-January 15, 2008
Page I of] 0
receipt If, after 25 days from the filing date (in this case, January 25~, no ~tten objections are .
received from direct recipients of this staff analysis, the request is "'.I".I"W ved. However, if any
direct recipient of this staff analysis does object, the proposal is scheduled 'for the next regular
boundary commission public heaTIng. Direct recipients are the individuals eligible to request a
public hearing and are listed below under the fIrst boundary commission standard.
, . I
. The proposed annexation area includ~s a portion of on~ tax lot that is developed with one single- .
family residence '(refer to Maps No. land 2). The owners of the property reqnested annexation
in order to prepare the annexatiOll area for low-density residential developmeAt
I
The annexation area is not contiguous to the main body of the City of Springfield, but abuts other
noncontiguous portions of the city. It is located within the acknowledged ur~an growth boundary
(UGB), which lies along the northern boundary of the annexation area. ,The portion of this
property located outside the UGB is not being annexed and will not be provided orban services.
~ Ii
. ,
The existing zoning of the annexation area is.LDRJUF,low-density residential with urbanizing
fringe overlay, in Lane County. It is designated low-density residentialln thel:Eugene-Springfield
Metropolitan Area General Plan (Metro Plan).' Upon the effective date ofithe annexation, the
annexation area will be automatically zoned LDR consistent with the 10w-de~sity residential plan
designation. ' 1,:.
~' . ,
. Resolution No. 07-57, unanimously approved by the Springfield city council on November 23,
2007, initiated the annexation. The city council's support for the annexation was based on
evidence that the annexation area conld be provided with key urban services. As requested by
the council, the annexation request was forwaided to the boundary commission. The city council
reviewed the Annexation Agreement between the city and the property oy,oners outlining the
. agreements between the two parties for the provision of urban services and financing
responsibilities before supporting the annexation. The. Annexation Agreefuent has been fully'
executed and is part of the boundary cominission' s record for this application:. '. '
I
Following is a .brief analysis of each of the boundary co1J!II1ission standards. j:
"
I
Provide an impartial forum for resolution of local jurisdictional quesO;f1ns. Consider the
effects of the boundary change on other units of governments. ORS 199.410(1)(b) and
199.410(3)(c) ,. .
This annexation request was fIled in accordance with provisions in ORS 199fand was determined
to be a valid fIling iIi accordance with OAR 191-006 (adopted administrati'\re rule on boundary
commission fIling requirements). The petitioners requested the proposal be,processed using the
expedited procedure_
,
I
This staff analysis was sent to the following direct recipients: Lane b())lndary commission
members, Lane County commissioners, Lane County Land Management Division, Lane County
Environmental Health Division, City of Springfield, Willamalane Park andliRecreation District,
. Daniel and Shannon Jackson, and Jeannette Applauso at Branch Engineerin~." . d
" -. '. . \ lJate Receive
. r .
LCLGBC Staff Analysis (Ee Sl' 0ll-16) - January 15, 2008 " MAR 7 2008
Page 2 of JO
..,
'ATTACHMENT 1 - 6
Planner: BJ
-,
.. " '.
Upon the annexation effective date, the area will be annexed automatically t9 the Lane County
Metropolitan Water Service District and the WiIlamalane Park and Recreation District [ORS
199.51O(2)(c)] because the dty is a part of . both these special districts. The Lane County
Metropolitan Wastewater Service District was formed to provide the finarici1\g for the regional
wastewater treatment plant serving wastewater users within the cities of Eug~~e and Springfield
and other users within the urbanizable area. The park district provides park and tecreation
services and facilities to Springfield residents. ::
This request is consistent with this boundary commission'standard.
Ii
ConSider the orderly determination and adjustment of local government boundaries to best
. meet th~ needs of Lane County and Oregon. Consiiler alternative I solutions where
intergovernmental options are identified and mtike decisions based on the most effective long-
range option among iilentified alternatives. ORS 199.410(1), 199.410(2), 9-nd 199.410(3)(a)
~~ I
I'
. II
, . I
The annexation .area is located within the acknowledged UGB of the Metro Plan and is not
contiguous to the main body of the City of Springfield. 'Territory within the UGB ultimately will
. be within the City of Springfield. Annexation of this property fulfIlls the policies adopted in the
Metro Plan of annexing out to th~ban growth boundary. 1:.
.' . I .
Noncontiguous annexations are allowed by state annexation law and piovide~ for in th~ Metro
Plan if certain criteria are met. The Metro Plan policy for noncontiguous annebtion (policy #12,
page D-C-5) requires that noncontiguous annex'ations meet the following criteri~: .'
. . I
The area to be annexed WIll be provided urban service(s), which is (are) desired'
immediately by the residentsly.vy"';Y owners. I '
II. .'
a.
,
b. The area to be an;nexed Can be serviced (with a minimum level of services,' as
directed in the Metro Plan) in a timely and cost-efficient mamler and is a logical
extension of the city's service delivery system. ic
c. . The annexation proposal'is accompanied by 'suppof! witlrin the' area p,upused for
annexation from the owners of at least half the land area in the #rected territory.
'I"
The incremental process of annexation causes short-term "boundaries to be!~established. The
acknowledged comprehensive plan in this area identifies the !=ity of Springfield as the unit of
, government, which will provide urban services to this urbanizable area withiD the UGB. In the
long term, territory within this geographic area will be annexed to Springfield. I: .
I,
"
This annexation is consistent with boundary COIIlIlllSSlon adininistrative, !ule impiementing
policies (I), (2), (5), and (7), which recogriize annexation to an' existing' ciiy as the preferred
method of "servicing urbariizable land. . " ,
Date Received
LCLGBC Staff Analysis lECSPOB-16)-January 15,2008
Page 3 of 10
'I'
:'
It;:. ~t ~
ATTACHMENT 01 - 7
MAR 7 ZOO8
Planner~ RI
(1)
This policy recognizes cities as the logical providers of urban levels of service
"
within urban growth boundaries when consistent with the comprehensive plaII. .
(2)
ii
, I
This policy expresses the commission's preference for providing urban services
through annexation to a city in order to provide' urban' seryices to urbaniZable
lands.
(5)
'. ~
This . policy encourages provision of urban levels of service within urban growth
boundaries. . .
(7)
This policy expresses the commission's preference for anneiation to an existing
city over all other alternatives as a means of , extending seryices to urbanlzable
lands; "
I:
. ~. . .
Implementing policy (3) recognizes that in order to meet the long-term objectives of annexing
out to an acknowledged UGB, short~term boundaries are created, which ari,: logical within the
context of the.future service boundary. Ii
This proposal to annex territory to the City of Springfield is consistent with boundary
Ii
commission policies and this stan9ard~ i
'. ~ , .
Make boundary commission determinations, whit;h are consistent with acknowledged local
comprehensive plans. Assure an adequate quality and quantity of public fervices required in
. the comprehensive plan to meet existing and futur.e growth. For major ,boundary changes,
there must be assurance that the proposed' unit of government is financially viable. ORS
199.410(1)(d), 199.410(3)(b) and (d) .'. ' :' .'
The annexation area is within the Metro Plan UGB. The Metro Plan was abknowledged by the
Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC) in August 1982 and has been
. subsequently amended. The Metro Plan recognizes annexation as the highest priority for
extending the minimum range of urban services to urbanizable areas (polici~s #8 and #10, page
ll-C-4) and recognizes that ultimalely, allleiritory wilhin the UGB will be anhexed to an existing
city (policy #16, page Il~C-5). .'
The annexation area is designated liS low-density residential in the Metro' Plan.' Upon the
effective date of tbeannexation, the annexation area will be automatically'rezoned to !.DR in the
city.
The aIJ1lexation area will take advantage of urban service delivery systemS' that are already in
place to serve this area. The following serVices are either aVaIlable or can:: be extended to. the
annexation area. '~
I
I
Water - Springfield Uti,lity B,oard (SUB) will provide water service to the annexation arelj
following annexation. An existing 6-inch line is located at the east end of Vera Street arid is
avail3.ble to serv~ th7 ~pexation area. . Date R~ed
, LCLGBC Staff Analysis CECSP08-16)-January 15,2008
Page40fiO '". ,
, :-i,..:;,_~_ ATTACHMENT 1 - B
:: 111M i 7a:J8
I
P.AnnAl'~ 8J
. I;
Electricitv - SUB indicates that it provides electric service in this general area and can provide .
service to new development within. the annexation area. ,Upon annexatio~. and development,
underground power will be extended to the annexation area from an existing line near the
intersectiOli of Yolanda Street and 19th Street.
I,
Police services - The Springfield police department can provide police pr6tection to the area
after annexation without jeopardizing service in other parts of the city. Sprinlifield police already
provide service to nearby properties within the city.' . I.
. ' I'.
. ,
Fire and emerl!encv services - The annexation area is currently without. structural fire protection.
Annexation to the city will provide these services to the developing area. Th~ annexation area is
located withi!J the four minute response time area of the Springfield Fire ahd Life Safety Fire
Stations 3, 4; and 5. Developmeni of the annexation area will be snbje~t to all applicable
Springfield tlevelopment code and fire code requJrements t6 provide adeqllate fire and life safety
. I
access and water suppli ,:
Emergency, medical transport (~bulance) services are provided on a ~regional basis by
Springfield, Springfield, and Lane Rural FirelRescue to. central Lane County. The annexation
area will continue to receive this service consistent with the adopted ambulance service area
(ASA) plan. Mutual aid agreem4jts have been adopted by the three region~ ASA providers to
provide backup coverage for each other's jurisdictions, ,', , .
'. . i.
Parks and recreation - After annexation, the annexation area will be within the WiIlamalane Park
,and Recreation District boundary. City residents receive park and recreatioh services from the
district. The district operates two aquatic centers, a community center, an adult activity center,
and 31 parks containing a variety of outdoor recreationai amenities. The cJo,sest park to the site
is Royal Delle, a 2.76-acre neighborhood park at 401 Blackstone' Street. Other nearby
recreational opportunities indude harvest Landing and page Park. I'
Schools, - Springfield School District' 19 serves this area. EXisting!: schools-:- Yolanda
elementary, Briggs middle, and Springfield high-serve this neighborhood and can accomfuodate
students resulting from new development occurring within the annexation area.
,.
" . -" I.
Wastewater - Springfield staff indieates a public wastewater system is currently under'
construction and'incJudes, a new lift station located in the. annexation !iarea. Future site
development will be served from this lift station upon acceptance by the city council (expected
, by May 2008). As a part of the system construction, a 15-inch diameter wastewater main will be
extended from the lift station to the existing westerly right-of-way of!' 19th Street.. The
Annexation Agreement .requires the applicant to extend the 15-inch line along 19th Street and the
Hayden Bridge Stub prior to the street construction.. The public system as ~nstructed will have
sufficient capacity and sufficient depth to serve the annexation area. The applicant is required to
construct a public gravity wastewater system to serve the annexation area, ai;:.needed, in addition
to the 15-inch wastewater main described above.
ATTACHMENT 1 - 9
i:
!! ,
Dato Rec~ived
;IYiAn V 7008
Plan nor. C I
~ : - '.-
" i"
.
LCLGBC Staff AnalysjS(ECSPOB-16)-January 15, 2008
Page 5 of 10 - ,
I'
I!
"
Stormwater - Springfield staff indicates an existing IS-inch public stormy.,ater management
'system is located adjacent to the west line of the annexation area, approximately 240 feet north of
the centerline of Vera Street. Another existing I 2-inch public stormwater man'agement system is
located adjacent to the west line of the annexation area, approximately 170 feet south of the
centerline of Vera Street. The applicant will be allowed to connect to either or both of these
existing public stormwater management systems,. but will be required to proYide pre-treatment
for I DO percent of newly paved surfaces, using such methods as double chambered catch basins
with oil filtration media or a water quality manhole. Additionally, a minimu~ of 50 percent of
the non-building rooftop runoff impervious. surfaces on the annexation area shall be treated
vegetatively, using methods such as' a bioswale. The applicant will be required to maintain the
. I
post-developed runoff rate of flow equal to or below the pre-development rate, of flow. The city
grants development approval only where adequate public and/Or private slorm\vater management
system provisions have been made as determined by the public works direct~r, consistent with.
the city:s Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual. .'
Streets - Springfield staff indicates the annexation area has frontage oil 19th Stt,eet which is under
the jurisdiction of Lane County. Along this frontage, 19th Street is not improved. The section of
'19th Street right-or-way north of Yolanda Street is a local access road (LA~) Which does not
receive county maintenance. On this section of 19th Street, the travel way:;is an unimproved
gravel surface, "J!J!,uAimately 12 feet wide. Such a surface is not adequa& to accommodate
additional traffic that would be dVcipated from the applicants' proposed development, and is not
adequate to meet fire and life safety department needs. !'
19th Street is designated as a collector street in Springfield's Conceptuai 'Street Map. The
applic,aIits are required to dedicate land adjacent to tlie westerly line of tbe existing right-of-way
sufficient to construct a fully-improved 2/3 width colle~tor street (c~mp1et~ with gutter, curb,
pavement, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees) along the 19 Street frontage of the
annexation area. The applicants are required to dedicate' a right-of-way of 60 feet through the
annexation area to facilitate the east-west connection of 19th Street with the existing Vera Street
right-of-way and pavement and, to construct the easterly extension of Vera Street to an urban
standard from the west line of .the annexation area to 19th Street (completei: with gutter, curb,
pavement, sidewalks, street lighlS, and street trees). .The.applicalltsare required to provide for an
improved secondary access to the annexation area via either the extensiori of 19th Street to
Yolanda Avenue or the imp. v ,'"""ent of Hayden Bridge Stub from 19'h Street!'and easterly 10 the
existing unproved pavement. Further street/transportation requirements are 9utlined within the
annexation agreement between the applicants and the city. "
, . . I:
Solid waste manal!'ement - Private firms and individuals collect and transport, solid waste to the
Lane County administered landfill. :-
. [
Communication facilities .,. Various providers offer both, wire and wireless communication
. ,
services in the Springfield-Springfield "",,;"vpvlitan area. Existing providers and those entering
" ~
'the market bave the capability to provide service to this area. j' .
,
:-:,\:~'
~
.-
ATTACHMENT 1 -1 Q
Date Received
"
MARl 1 .
': ZOll8
,Ii
,
PlAnnAr~ R.I
LCLGBCStaff Analysis (ECSP08-16)-ianuary 15,2008
Page 6 ono
, .
Land use controls - The annexation area is within Springfield's portion of the urban growth
boundary. Thrqugh an intergovernmental agreement between:Lane County and the City of
Springfield, the city already has. planning and building jurisdiction for this 'property. The city
will continue to administer land. use controls after annexation. ' .
The rhinimnm level of required services are either immediately available br can be provided
within a reasonable future time frame as needed. This request is consistent with boundary
commission policies and this standard. . ,
Consider the comprehensive pliln's economic, demographic, antI sociological trentIs antI
projections antI its environmental policies, pertinent to the proposal. ORS,199.410(3)(tI) antI
I,
,~~m I .
, I
,
. The annexation proposal is consistent with the Metro Plan, as it is an ihcremental step in
implementing the long-range plan for this area. The UGB, land uses, and p6]icie~ in the Metro .
Plan were developed to meet the future needs of the metropolitan community] The proposed use
. ,
is consistent with the long-range plans for the area. II
. -. . - ~
This proposed annexation is consistent with this.boundary commission standard.
I:
Recommendation
1ft
The boundary commission staff recommends that the proposed annexation to the City of
. .
Springfield (BC File EC SP 08 - ] 6) be approved without the hearing and staff report as required
by ORS 199.466. "
, t
If a public hearing is requested, the proposal will be heard at the next available boundary
commission public hearing. If non~ is requested it will be approved and ~ffective Januarv 25,
2008 (ORS ]99.466 and ORS 199.519). ':: '- .
I
I::
III I
I:
I:
LCLGBC Staff Analysis (Be spos.- ]6)- January 15, 2008
.Page7oflO .
ATTACHMENT 1 - 11
D8teReceived
I
,:
I MAR 1 ZOIIIl
Planner: BJ
Sign and return thisfonn to the boundary commission office ONLY.ifyou ddsire that a public
hearing be held. Offici::: 99 East Broadway, Suite 400, Eugene, Oregori 97401-3111
. .
Pursuant to ORS 199.466, I REQUEST THAT A PUBLIC HEARING and STAFF
.,
STUDY be conducted on an annexation of territory to the City of Springfield (BC SP 08 - I~), as'
required by ORS 199.461. This form must be filed in'the commission offic~ no later than 5:00
,
p.m., Januarv 25_ 2008.
Reason for public hearing:
-'
Date
Signaliire
Title
1ft
Representing
Note: If you or your agency requests a pub1ic.hearing; the commission askshhat you attend the
requested hearing. .
pI: LCBC: L:\BCIEXP\lDDIflECSPOB16 SN.DOC .
. !.ns, Sav~d: January,} 5. 200B
ATTACHMENT 1 -12
Date ReCeived
MAR 7 2/lll8
Planner: BJ
,
"
- .
u.:LQBC S.~fAnaIysis (ECSPDS-16)-January IS, 2008
PageS ofl 0
MAP No. 1 VI\..llulr MAP
AnnexaJion to Springfield (Jackson) .
ECSP08-16
. i
GENERAL LOCATION OF
. ANNExATION AREA
Oackson)
(EC SP 08 -16)
. .
. ii
~
(
N
'W~E
.
UGB
_ . Jackson
City streets
Arterial, major:
. Arterial, minor:
City Limits
'II!ISPR
0.4 0 0.4 0.8 Miles
,..' "'"
date Received
I!
il MAR 7 2008
LCL<3BC Staff Analysis (ECSPOB-l6)-January 15, 2008
Page 9'of 10
ATTACHMENT 1 - 13
Planner: BJ.
MAP No.2 SITE MAP
Annex~tion 10 Springfield (Jackson)
EC SP,08-16
.~
--~
!.~~. : ~r' .
. .
,,-:-
r-
"
-
/
,.co ,"",x~1
/ "
[---1'" ...
I
I '"""
('\-
IT'
,. l-I<..J1d..... P/""cI1<- R:k
I Ii
I 1:--
. . ---I
--.J
.~~
'Let
ir\J=
'~.
. ~ ~ ' ; .'
-:--t;j) . -.
--$ il t-
stk',.,\-- -
m_. ._- ~D':d - ---0, - I .
---- ID;.....~--..._-_.:,- !/ 1;1 =E
FI," --'j' "-'f;L~J "'j-..t})=t:'1L_ 1:1', 1\ il rn';LWJ.'~J- --Cl-.......
Date Received .. ~a~~so~
MAR ,7 Z008 . . W!aiLots
. City Limits
SP~
200 0., 200 400 Feet
, I
ANNEXATION AREA
Includes part of TL 2000, 17-03-24-31;
, Owned Py Daniel and Shannon J aclcson
(Ee SF 08 -16}
I. .
'~.
-"
.....1
N
+
. . \".' Planner: BJ
. w-.cmc Staff AIllll.Ysis (Ei::spo8-l6)-January15, 2008
,Page '!O:'oM'O" : ~ .~ . .'
" " ,':'..': . ATTACHMENT 1 -14'
L
.'
RESOLUTION NO 07-57
A RESOLUTION INITIATING ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF
SPRINGFIELD AND REQrn;STlNG THAT THE LANE COUNTY LOCAL GOVERNMENT
BOUNDARY COMMISSION APPROVE THE ANNEXATION BY J;MJ;1JITEDPROCESS..
. ,
WHEREAS, the City received an application to annex approximately 9 acres into the City of Springfield
on February 27, 2007, said ''',;'u,j being described as follows: . .',
Township 17 South, Range 3 West, Se~tiori 24, Map 31, portion of Tax Lot 2000 as more particular~
described in Exhibit A of this Resolution.' ,
WHEREAS, the territory to be annexed is within the Eugene-Springfield Urban ,Growth Boundary, and is
proximate to the City limits; and, ...
. I
WHEREAS, the City Council is authorized by ORS 199.490(2)(a)(A) to initiate anriexation upon .
receiving .consent in writing from a majority of the electors registered in the territory' proposed to be
annexed and written consent from more than half of the owners ofland in the territory l',vl'u,ed to be
annexed, who also own more than half of the land in.the territory proposed to be annexed and of real
property therein r~presenting more than half of the assessed value of all real propertY in the territory
proposed to be annexed; and, .
~
,
. WHEREAS, the property owners althecertain territory described in Exhibit A sign:~d a consent to annex
(Exhibit C), and 4{ . .
.' , I.
WHEREAS', two registered voters reside within the territory and have signed a consent to annex (Exhibit
, ',- II
~~ .' ,
WHEREAS, the City Council is authorized by Spriogfield Development Code 6.03Q(2)(a) and ORS
222,111 and other applicable Oregon Revised Statutes to initiate annexation when the territory in the
. annexation proposal can be provided with the minimum level of key urban, facilities:iand services in an
orderly and efficient manner as defmed in Eugene-Springfield Metro Area General ?'an Mi:tro Plan
Policies 8.a and b, Page II-C-4; and where there will be a logical area and time within which to deliver
urban services and facilities; and . ..
WHEREAS, minimum level key urban facilities and services are defined in the Eui~ne-Spri~gfield Metro
Area General Plan, page V-3 as wastewater service, stormwater service, solid wast~ 'management, water
service, fire and emergency medical services, police protection, city-wide parks an~;recreation programs,
electric service, land use controls, communications facilities and services, and public'schools on a diStrict-
wide basis; and
WHEREAS, the territOry proposed to be annexed can be immediately provided with a minimum level. of
key urban facilities and'services with the exception of public sanitary sewer service; public stormwater
management service and street improvements, which are being provided for in anAnnexation Agreement
which has been negotiated with City staff and the Owners, as described in Attachment 2: Informational
Attachment, Case Number LRP2007-00009 and Attachment 4: Annexation Agr~,ement; and
. . ,
WHEREAS, an annexation agreement has been proposed for execution by the CitY lof Springfield and
Daniel and Shannon Jackscm; (Owners) which will memorialize the Owner's commitment, agreement and
obligation to meet the City's requirements for provision of the minimum level of key urban services as
required for an affirmative City recommendation for the annexation request; and I.
ATTACHMENT 1 -15
WHEREAS, the City Manager is authorized to forWard this resolution supporting the applicant's request
to the Lane .County Local Government Boundary Commission when an annexation ~ent is entered
into by the City of Springfield and Daniel and Shannon Jackson; (Owners); and
WHEREAS, the City Manager is authorized to forward this resolution supporting th~ applicant's request
for expedited processing to the Lane County Local Government Boundary Commission. .
i
,.
,
.. ,
NOW TIIEREFORE BASED ON TIIE FOREGOING REClT ALS, TIIE COMMO:& COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF SPRINGFiELD DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: "
i.
. ~
Section I: The Common Council of the City of Springfield does hereby recomfuend approval Of the
annexation of the subject territories to the City by the. Lane County Local Government Boundary
Commission, Lane County, Oregon, said territories being.des~ribed as follows:' 'i .
~:.
I
Township 17 South, Range 3 West, Section.24, Map 31, portion of Tax Lot 2000, said territory
being included in the property more particularly described in Exhibit A oftlJjsReso1ntion.
Section 2: This resolution shall take effect upon adoption by the Common Councilbfthe City of
Springfield and approval by the Mayor.
.' I
Section 3: The City Council recommends that the Boundary Commission approve 1:I)e proposed .
annexation authorized by ORS 199.466 by expedited process without the study, public hearing and
adoption offinal order required by ORS 199.461. ,
,
Section 4: The City Manager shall ffrward this resolution supporting the applicant'; request to the Lane
County Local Government Boundary Commission when an aimexation agreement i~ entered into by the
City of Springfield and Daniel and Shannon Jackson (Owners) and upon receipt of ~vidence that the
annexation agreement has been recorded. ,
,
. ,
ADv.t' lr;v by the Common Council of the City of Springfield this 3rd day ofDecefuber 2007 by a vote
of 2 for and --.Q. against. '
1
'-:'li
Mayor
r-li
APPROVED by the Mayor of the City' of Springfield this 3r.
ATTEST:
flr>Lu Jrtrv.n.-..
. City RecorderO
"r.".q',,'n " f ~r.' t'lIlEIn
r;,"':r"~i_J~};'1J ~ ,:J' ,...l\;) "J
I\q, TO FOFlioll \
....)",,'f'..c--"- ,) ~,-
DATE: \I) 2. ':!. \ lJ"">,
OFFICE OF cin ATTORNEY
1('
,
,
ATTACHMENT" -16.
RESOLUTION NO. 07-57
EXHIBIT A
.'
LEGAL DESuw: uON
FOR
ANNEXATIONI'URPOSES ' ,
, . . , , t
LAl'IDS OF l?ANIEL L AND ~ONL JACKSON '
(pORTION OF TAX MAP 17-03-24-31, TAX LOT 2(00)
!I .'
SITUATED in uninCOIpO:ratedareainLane C'!~ty, State of Oregon in the Southwest 1/4 of Section
24, Township 17 South, Range 3West ofllie WillaIIl.ette Merl~ and descn"bed as follov.:s:
. ,I
BEING a: portion of the lands that ~e conveyed: to Daniel L. and Shannon Batty in that certain
Special WaIranty Deed that was recorded May 16, 1990 in Reel 1632R at Reception N,ilmber
9022540 in the Official Records of Lane County, State of Oregon, said portiOD. being more
particularly desim.'bed as follows; I.
Co=encing at a ~int 17.42 $ins north ofa:Point where the East line oftbe William C. S~cer
Donation Land Claim Numbel~O, Notification Number 3265, intersects tJ:le line between Section .
,24 andSeC:ti.on.25, To~ 17 South, Range 3 West'Ofthe Will.am.etteMeIj.dian; thence North89'
42' 33" West 393.00 feet and North. DO' 06' 16" We$!; 22~.00 feet to the southwest comer of said
lands that Were conveyed in the aboVe deed, which point lies on the cci.stirig city limits Ime of tI:ic
City of Springfield and is the TRUE l'u.u\ ~ OF BE\rll"t!"t.Ll'lG of the lands pl=ingdescn"bedherein;
, , t . ~
THENCE leaving said TRUE l'U.ll.1.l. OF BE\riH"I.I{'\ ti and along said city limits line and west
line of said landS that were conveyed in said deed, NORTII DO' 06' 16" WEST 90.0 FEET, more or
less, to an angle point In the Urban GrowthBound;uy of the City ofSpringfi~d;l.J:J:M CE, leaving
said city limits line and silid m:st line of said lands that were w~, ~ied in said. deed, NORTH 63'
35' EAST 435 FEET, mor~ or less, along said Urban Growth Bounclaxy tq an lIlIg1e point in said
boundary that lies on the east line of said lands that were co!IVliyedinsaidd~ed;l.l:1.lW"tl.;.I!<, leaving
said Urb~ Growth Boundary and alQD.g said east line of said lands that wcre:conveyed in said deed,
SOUlE DO' 06' 24" EAST 1100 ~T, more or less, to the: southeast comJ of said lands that were
conveyed in the said deed.; ~ .L.D.M1CE. along the south line of said1a:fu3s that were conveyed
in the said deed NORTH 89' 42' 33" WEST 393.00 .l'.l:!J:U Kl!il uHNlNGtothe TRUE l'OINT OF
BEuml'Ul'tG ~d CONTAINING 9:0 A~S, lIlore or less; . " .
ATTACHM~.l: 1.. - 17
';:"1- "'-'lc. Ji. (Z u.l:J7
""0. .""'1/
r REGlSlERED I
PROFESSIONAL
I..AfP) SURVE'[OR
~~.
OfaoN
JULY 20, 1993
REXA;'BETZ
,\, 42fiitl "
1.-tit. ~;.!' t ",/.,';07
. Date Received .
~EC l) !I 2DO!t
.Planner: BJ
i
'. ''?i
)li,
t::. . ,
ti
B~~ '
~ ~ ~ I i~
. Q .~ .
~~~fil.
~ ~:;I~
" g~~
~~ .
....~
~
:t: .
! -
~ ,.
~ti .
-"r '"
S-
. .
. EXHIBIT 8 .
. ] - f .
.. ! . a
-@ 5~ n
;:~! S
'j~f!~.1
'\l U
II ""
.. .
...;
'~ i
I
III
15)
'J!
1I
Ii .
-MJJ:;::
...., ~~..i
. .....
I
' , ..
3
~
r.
I
~
..
l
!
-I.,
lJr~gon
l'-_'
March 27,2008
LANE COUNTY LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION
99 EaSt Broadway
. Suite 400
Eugene, OR 97401-3111
(541) 682-4425
FAX (541) 682-2635
TO: Amy Sowa, Recorder, City of Spnugfie1d
FROM: Paula L. Taylor, Executive Officer
SUBJECT: . EC SP 08 -16 (Expedited Procedure)
ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO TIIE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD
. . (J ackson) :i
By this correSpondence, let it be known that:
1. A petition for annexation of territory to the City of Springfield-located 'in north Springfield,
nqrth of Yolanda Avenue, west of 19'" Street, east of Vera Street (T17S R03W S24 Map 31 part
of tax lot 2000)-was file<J;SIO December 31, 2007, with the Lane CountY Local Government
Boundary Commission in actordance with ORS 199.466 and ORS 199.490(2)(a)(A).'
"
, ," ~ .
2. An analysis was prepared by ihe boundary' cormnission staff with a recominendation of approval '
and was sent, on January IS, 2008, to the Lane boundary commission mdmbers; Lane County
commissioners; Lane County Land Management Division; Lane County ~nvironmental Health
Division; City of Springfield; WlIlamalane Park and Recreation District; iPaniel and Shannon
Jackson; and Jeanette App1auso at Branch Engineering. '
3. No request for publichea.ring was received by 5:00 p.m., January 25, 2oo8.~. .
4. This annexation proposal, described ill attached Exhibit A and sbown on att~ched map Exhibit ~,
is hereby approved and effective January 25, 2008 (ORS 199.466 and ORS \99.519).
Please acknowledge receipt of this correspondence..
NOTE: In accordance with 'ORS 199.510(2)(c), the annexation area is hereby part of the Lane County
Metropolitan 'Wastewater Service District and the WiIlamalane Park and Recreation District
, ' , ' ,
Attachments
cc: Daniel and Shannon Jackson .
Willamalane Park and Recreation District
, .
I: .
"
"
ATTACHMENT 1 - 19
EXHffiIT A
B,eg at apt 1,149.72 ft N of a pt where the E Ii of the William.C. SpencerDLC No. 50 intersects
with the Ii between S24 and S25 T17S R03W WM; .' . .
th N89042'33"W 393.00 ft and Nooo06'16"W 225.00 ft mil to apt, sd pt being bnthe existing
Springfield city limits and the TPOB;' .'
thalg sd city limits NOoo06' 16"W 920.00 ft mil to apt;
th leaving sd city limits Ii N63035'E 435.00 ft mil to' apt;
th SOoo06'24"E 1,100 ft mil to apt;
th N89042'33"W 393.00 ft mil to the TPOB, all in Lane County, Oregon.
o
~
LCBC:/..COG: LIBClLEGAL\2008\ECSPOB/6 LGLDOC
!"asr Saved: Marrh 25, 2008
ECSP08:-16
Page 1 of 1
ATTACHMENT 1 - 20
.1:
i', _
, il
.', .
.EXHIBIT B
~
. ..' ...r-- ~
---- '
t. .....
..
,,'.'
, L;
-
ANNEXATION AREA
Includes part of TL 2000, 17~3-24-31;
Owned by Daruel and Shannon Jackson
(Ee SP 08-16) .
. J.N,..~t beilig annexed I
. (.'/ .'
f1
I :,
:;
r
.,..---. '-. -
/
f.
,
,
.Ii
I
-=-
I
II
"'"
-~
.~ (
: : :t=
H"'~d"" E r'~ ~
: '\i
I,'i
p--
I 1: ~i
l~---'
_ / --1
-l{'_ -
:i~',
.:,~t -!
.~-
~ ~
...JI_.JJ'r' I 'It.,
'.' I I i 'l'~ll'" ...< ~.._..- --.:.... -- =- .
:1 I ~ .. j~J 1:1
- - UGl3 .
,
_ Jack~on
n Tax'iLots
City Umit~
SPR
+
..-.- ...-'
~;
1-,
~.
~ ... - ..- .- ~ ,
3;lWSE...; -I, II
\ \IIIO>:~_:.I__..I\
.-( [J -(tJl,- :L
lp
jf=~:
. -'
",-.
II
,
ECSP08-16
Page 1 ofl
200
o
200
400 Feet
". I
ATTACHMENT 1 - 21