HomeMy WebLinkAboutPacket, Pre PLANNER 5/11/2009
" /' PRE-SUBMI'F~ 4L
DISTRIBUTION LIST:
,
,
Date Distributed:
s- / /-:2-001
HECEIVED
~ Dave Puent - Buiiding
l / Gilbert GordonlMelissa Fechtel- Fire
1/ Jon Dr~scoll- Traffic . By: fRf -Svt'::M\TTf'\t.,
~ Matt Stouder - Public Works/Engineering t-A.1e[ :pp,aGT
Dennis Ernst/Chris Moorhead, Surveying I of--z..,2. p~
Planner.s4--rA /I" f
MAY 11 2009
City of Springfield
---
. Development SerVices Department
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
541-725-3753 Phone
541-726-3689 Fax
,
Pre-Submittal Meeting
Case Number Assigned: PRE2009-00013
Date Submitted:
5/8/2009
APPLICANT: INTERNATIONAL PAPER
801 42ND STREET
SPRINGFIELD
OR
97478
Proiect Name: IPIWEYER RIVERWATER INTAKE
Project Description: Pre-Submittal for Major Modification to Site Plan Review - river water
intake-pump station and forced main
Application Type: Site Plan Modification Mjr
Job Address: 800 48TH ST
Assessor's & Tax Lot #: 1702320000100
DISCLAIMER: Applications will not be exempt from Development Code or procedural amendments that may occur
between the time of the Pre-Submittal Meeting and Submittal of the Application for Development Review. Please contact our
office at 541-726-3753 with any questions or concerns.
A Planner will be assigned the following business day and will contact you to confirm the meeting date and time.
rf\J~Dog -006}l
PRE.SUBMllTAl REC'D
MAY g 2009
>lanJobPrint.rpt
5/8/2009
2:57: 10PM
Pre-Su-)mitta- Meeting
. Development Services Department
. Room 615/616
PRE-SUBMITTAL MEETING DATE: Friday, May 15,2009
1. PRE-SUBMITTAL MTG #PRE2009-00013 (Site Mod Major) INTERNATIONAL
Assessor's Map: 17-02-32-00 TL 100 PAPER
Address: 801 42nd Street
Existing Use: Container Board Mfg
The applicant submitted plans for a Site modification major to original site plan
DRC2008-00006. Due to micro-tunneling problems, an alternative approach is being
considered to construct a pump station adjacent to the fish screens and route the force
main under the Hwy 126 bridges and then across Kizer Slough to the plant site.
Meeting Dateffime: Friday, May 15,2009 11:00 - noon DSD 616
Planner: Andy Limbird
PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D
MAY 8 2009
City ofSpringfiedd .
Development Services Department
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477 .
Site Plan" Review
I'
~.1 . .
Site Plan Review Pre-Submittal: D
Site Plan Review Submittal: D
.. . . a
, - -
,
Applicant Name:
Icompany:
IAddress:
, .
IAPPlicant's Rep.:
Icompany:
IAddress:
,
'1 Property OvJner:
Icompany:
IAddress:
Phone
International Paper
541-741-5400
801 42nd St Sprinqfield, Oreqon 97478
j
I
. .------c----.--J
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
,
Fax:
541-741-5670
Phone
International Paper
541-741-5400
Fax:
541-741-5670
801 42nd St. Sprinqfield, Oreqon 97478
Phone
541-741-5400
. International Paper
Fax:
541-741 "5670
801 42nd St. Sprinqfield, Oreqon 97478
ii ,. I TAX LOT
ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17-02-32-00,Tll00 ~"""''-
"
Property Address: 801 42nd St. Sprinqfield, Oreqon 97478
ISize of Prop~rty: 450
I Proposed Name of Pro1ect:'
, ,
I DescriPti~n?f If you are mling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application.
Proposal., " See attached narrative
IExisting use:l Container Board Manufacturinq
INew Impervious Surface Coverage (Including Bldg. Gross Floor Area):
"
Si natures: Please si n and our name and date in the a pro riate box on the next
-~ ". III '
17-02-3200-00100
Acres I2<;J
. Sauare Feet n
. -.
_. . . a
Ii
Associated Applications: ~?/<;n !2.,~ - G3\f1z... ( 0 1M) Signs:
Pre-Sub Case No.: ?'<< {~9-6aj:> Date: t:J! 0,/ac, I Reviewed by: . .~
Icase No.: Date: I Reviewed by:
IAPPlication ~ee: $ ?24-C- I Technical Fee: $ I Postaqe Fee: $ I
~ LfG.~, PRE.SUBMI*~k&SC&l- NUMBER: f~.)!.aJ<l - (5Dl)I\ .
t;l~t'lkt~...'l~&r~'::f'ii~;~~tlm'.w:\~,~~.;t"'~--$'..;il~~J:~$f.r~.&~!!MAy:.1;g,;r~~Z~Yfs~~a~^'Ii."ilC,,,,,,,~,,,,,~i,:-;;-,rc~,~~~ig\j~~l:S~?i!>~"l-'e;;""'it""".~
TOTAL FEES: $
'Revised 1/1/08 Mplly Markarian
sf
1 of 12
'I
~j
Owner Sighatures
. ! ~ .
This application form is used for both the required pre-submittal meeting and subsequent
complete application submittal. Owner signatures are required at both stages in the application
process. An:! application without the Owner's original signature will not be accepted.
Pre-Submittal
.The :undersigned acknowledges tha't the information in th'is application is correct and accurate for scheduling of the
Owner: pre-;s:2 .
~ ~~ Date:
~n;t~re I '.
p~r~ ~/.wa,.d
!i
Submittal l'
! .
I .'
I represent this application to be complete for submittal to the City.. Consistent with the completeness check
performed on this application at the Pre-Submittal Meeting, I.affirm the information identified by the City as
nec~ssary for processing the application is provided herein or the information will not be provided'if not otherwise
contained within the submittal, and the City may begin processing the application with the information as
submitted. This statement serves as written notice pursuant to the requirements of ORS 227.178 pertaining to a
complete application. .
II!,,~
..'/
8~ zOCJe;
.
Owner:
Date:
Si~nature
Priht
. ii,
-I:
Ii.
PRE-SUBMIlTAl REC'D
MAY
3 2009
. I
Revised 1/1/08 Mplly Markarian
ii"
2 of 12
Site Plan ~eview Application Process
1. Applicant Submits a Site Plan Review Application for Pre-Submittal
~ .
· The application must conform to the Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements
Checklist on pages 4-7 of this application packet.
· A p're-submittal meeting to discuss completeness is mandatory, and pre-submittal
meetings are conducted every Tuesday and Friday, from 10:00 am - noon.
l , .
o Pla'hning Division staff strives to conduct pre-submittal meetings within five to seven
working days of receiving an application.
I:
I;'
2. Applicant and the City Conduct the Pre-Submittal Meeting
o Th~ applicant, owner, and design team are strongly encouraged to attend the pre-
submittal meeting.
:~
o The meeting is held with representatives from Public Works Engineering and
Tra'nsportation, Community Services (Building), f;ire Marshall's office, and the Planning
Division and is scheduled for 30 to 60 minutes. . .
~ .
I'
· The Planner provides the applicant with a Pre-Submittal Checklist specifying the items
required to make the application complete if it is not already complete, and the
applicant has 180 days submit a complete application to the City.
. .
3. Applicarit Submits a Complete Application, City Staff Review the Application and
Issue a IDecision
o A c'pmplete application must conform to the Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements'
Checklist on pages 4-7 of this application packet. .
· A li,ype II decision, made after public notice, but without a public hearing, unless
appealed, is issued within 120 days of submittal of a complete application.
· Mailed notice is provided to property owners and occupants within 300 feet of ttie .
pro'perty being reviewed and to any applicable neighborhood association. In addition,
the applicant must post one sign, provided by the City, on the subject property.
I;'
· There is a 14-day public comment period, starting on the date notice is mailed.
Ii
· ApRlications are distributed to the Development Review Committee, and their
comments are incorporated into a decision that addresses all applicable approval
criteria and/or development standards; as well as any written comments from those
. . .
given notice.
'I
I .
o Apglications may be approved, approved with conditions, or denied.
~! .
· At the applicant's request, the Planner can provide a copy of the draft land use decision
priCir to issuing the final land use decision.
o The City mails the applicant and any party of standing a copy of the decision, which is
eff~ctive on the Clay it is mailed.
.. Thel decision issued is the final decision bf the City but may be appealed within 15
calendar days to the Planning Commission or Hearings Official.
PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'O
MAY. 32009
Revised 1(1(08 Molly Markarian 3 of 12
~I
Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements Checklist.
I~
I;'
.NOTE:
. ALL ofthe following items MUST be submitted for BOTH Pre-Submittal and Submittal.
. If you feel an item on.the list below does not apply to your specific application, please
state the r.eason why and attach the explanation to this form.
'0
o
o
o
Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee
calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is ayailable at the Development Services
Department. Any applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the
pre-sl!,bmittal and submittal stages. $346.00 pre submittal fee.
,>
~
~
SitePI,lan Review Application Form
II
Narra~ive explaining the purpose of the proposed development, the existing use of the
propeity, and any additional information that may have a bearing in determining the
action''to be taken. The narrative should also include the proposed number of employees.
and future expansion plans, if known.
, .
One copy included
,
"
Copy ~f the Deed This should be on file with the city... Was there a copy filed with the
minor ,site plan modification application? That may have shown the property belonged to
Weyerhaeuser.
Deed is on file with city. If an additional copy is required, IP will provide as part
of final permit application. ..
Copy of a Preliminary Title Report issued within the past 30 days documenting
ownership and listing all encumbrances. What was issued with initial minor site
modification application?
No property is changing hands. If a title report is required, IP will provide as
part of final permit application.
". .
Copy of the Site Plan Reduced to 81h"x 11", which will be mailed as part of the
"
required neighboring property notification packet. . .
One Copy Included
Right~of-Way Approach Permit Application provided where the property has frontage
on an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) facility.
NI A Property has frontage on highway but no access to highway will be part of
the p~oject. IP is working with ODOT to obtain lease for forced main.
Three:,(3) Copies of the Stormwater Management System Study with Completed
;J
Stormwater Scoping Sheet Attached - The plan, supporting calculations and
docum1entation must be consistent with the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures
Manual .
Stormwater management System study is not required for this project per City.
Engineer; Copy of application and e-mail response included with this application.
o
o
~
Three::(3) Copies of the Traffic Impact Study prepared by a Traffic Engineer in
accordance with SDC 4.2-105 AA. Traffic Impact Studies (TIS) allow the City to analyze
and evaluate the traffic impacts and mitigation of a development on the City's
transp6rtation system. In general, a TIS must explain how the trafficnfli~~libfilAl'mll RECIO
development affects the transportation system in te~ms of safety, tra~!Wlb~
access]iand mobility, and immediate and adjoining street systems. A TIS ~\'!.~ al802009
. .
Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian
,.
,.
4 of 12
cgJ
address, if needed, City, metro plan and state land use and transportation policies and
objectives. .
No alteration to existing traffic volume or patterns will occur as a result of this
projeCt. .
,
Seven (7) Copies of the Following Plan Sets for Pre-Submittal OR
Eighteen (18) Copies of the Following Plan Sets for Submittal
o All' of the following plans must include the scale appropriate to the area involved and
sufficient to show detail of the plan and related data, north arrow, and date of
pr~paration.
I . .
o All, plan sets must be folded to 8V," by 11" and bound by rubber bands.
a. Sit~ Assessment of Existing Conditions
o Prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect or Engineer.
Part of original project Joint Permit Application to Corps and DSL. Three
copies of the application and associated permits are included with this
application
cgJ Vicinity Map
I'
cgJ Th~ name, location and dimensions of all existing site features including buildings, curb
cuts, trees and impervious surface areas, clearly indicating what is remaining and what
is being removed. For existing structures to remain, also indicate present use, size,
set,backs from property lines, and distance between buildings. Part of original permit
and on drawings
Sh'own on drawings where applicable.
o Th~ name, location, dimensio~s, direction of flow and top of bank of all watercourses
an9 required riparian setback that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse
Map on file in the Development Services Department part of original permit
o Thk 100-year floodplain and floodway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest
adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendme'nt
or Letter of Map Revision part of original permit. .
N/A
o Th~ Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3-200 and _delineated on the Wellhead
Protection Areas Map on file in the Development Services Department
N/A
I~
c;g Physical features including, but not limited to trees 5" in diameter or greater when
measured 4 V2 feet above the ground, significant clusters of trees and shrubs, riparian
are'as,- wetlands and rock outcroppings review original permit in the area pipe crossing.
Area around pump station should be same as river water screens.
Se!f! photos of pipe routing; no trees are slated for removal. .
o Soi..1 types and water table information as mapped and specified in the Soils Survey of
Lane County. A Geotechnical Report prepared by an Engineer must be submitted
concurrently if the Soils Survey indicates the proposed developmen"A~l!lhBsI\ln'At~'o
soils and/or a high water table. . rK.I:~JUDIVI
~ - ~8m
b. Site Plan
, . .
o Prepared- by an Oregon licensed Architect, Landscape Architect, or Engineer
, , .
c;g Proposed buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area applicable to the
I .
Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian
5 of 12
,
pa~king requirement for the proposed use(s)), setbacks from property lines; and
distance between buildings
Drawing Package included (7copies)
I .
[;gJ Lotatiori' and height of existing or proposed fences, walls, outdoor equipment, storage,
trash receptacles, and .signs.
Existing 6' cyclone fence delineating ODOD and IP property fence at north end
of pipe crossing will be modified only to the extent necessary to
ai:(;ommodate pipe installation. See photos
,
o Location, dimensions, and number of typical, compact and disabled parking spaces;
including aisles, wheel bumpers, directional signs, and striping.
NIA.
[;gJ Dinlensions of the development area, as well as area and percentage of the site
. prcSposed for buildings, structures, parking and vehicular areas, sidewalks, patios, and
other impervious surfaCes.
Shown on drawings
I>
o Ob~ervance.of solar access requirements as specified in the applicable zoning district
NIA no solar access
o Om.site loading areas and vehicular and pedestrian circulation
NIA No loading areas
,
"
o Access to streets, alleys, and properties to be served, including the location and
. dimensions of existing and proposed curb cuts' and curb cuts proposed to be closed
. NIA No streets or alleys affected .
,
o Location, type, and number of bicycle parking spaces.
NIA Bicycle parking not required
o Location of existing and proposed transit facilities.
NIA No access to transit facilities
o An~a and dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for
COmmon open spaces, recreational areas, and other similar public and semi-public
l .
us~s.
NIA no public access..
o Phased Development Plan - where applicable, the Site Plan application must include a
ph'1sing plan indicating any' proposed phases for development, including the boundaries
ana sequencing of each phase. Phasing must progress in a sequence promoting street
co~nectivity between the various phases of the development and accommodating other
required public improvements, including bLit not limited to, sanitary sewer, stormwater
ma~ragement, water, and electricity. The applicant must indicate which phases apply
to the Site Plan application being submitted. .
NiA There are no additional phases planned for this project.
c. Iml'provement and Public Utilities Plan' PRE.SUBMIlTAl REC'D
[;gJ pr~pared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer MAY S 2009
[;gJ Location and width of all existing and proposed easements.
IP iis in the process of obtaining a lease for the pump station and the portion
of the forced main that is on ODOT property.
o Loqation, widths (of paVing and right~of-way), and names of all existing and proposed.
streets, alleys, dedications or other right-of-ways within or adjacent to the pro'posed
de~elopmenti including ownership and maintenance status, if ap'plicable. .
i'
I:
Revised .1/1/08 Molly Markarian '
6 of 12
NI A No new streets or alteration to existing streets are part of this project.
). .'
o Lotation and type of existing and proposed street lighting.
Nf.A
o Location of existing and required traffic control devices, fire hydrants, power poles,
tra'hsformers, neighborhood mailbox units, and similar public facilities
NIP. .
o Location, width, and construction material of all existing and proposed sidewalks,
sid~walk ramps, pedestrian access ways, and trails .
N/A No proposed walkways, .trails or pedestrian access for this project. New
pipe and pump station in public access areas on the river bank will be below
grade as shown in photos and drawings.
,
~ Loc;:ation and size of existing and prop~sed utilities on and adjacent to the site incl~ding
sal'litary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas,
telephone, and cable TV.
Existing utilities, owned and maintained by IP, consists of above ground
electrical power for temporary river water pumps and three (3) on ground
12" dia. HDPE water lines to the existing mill pump station on Kizer slough.
They will be removed when' new pump station is in service (also required by
~ .
Co,rps permit for temporary system). Electrical service for the new pump
station will be buried in the ground with the buried portions of the .new forced
main as show on the drawings. .
d. Grkding, Paving, &. Stormwater Management Plan' Not required per City Engineer
o Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer
I .
o Planting plan prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect where plants are
proposed as part of the storm water management system
NjA There are no changes to existing drainage
,
~ Robf drainage patterns and discharge locations.
Substation roof drains tci mill site as show on the drawings.
o Pervious and impervious area drainage patterns.
Negligible change to existing conditions see letter from public works dept.
o The size and location of stormwater management systems components, including but
not limited to: drain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention ponds; stormwater
quality measures; and natural drainage ways to be retained
N~'tural drainage will not be changed.
o EXi.~ting and proposed spot elevations and contours lines drawn at 1 foot intervals (for
land with a slope over 10 percent, the contour lines may be at 5 foot intervals) Oil
construction drawings. . .
Existing site contours will not be altered.
Ii
o Am:ount of proposed cut and fill.
N/A ('10 proposed cut or fill
PRE.sUBMITTAl REC'D
MAY B 2009
e. Landscape Plan
o Dr~wn by a Landscape Architect.
. No, changes to existing landscape are planned for this project.
I .
re~toration will return the area to preconstruction conditions.
Site.
Revised 1/1/08 ~;olly Markarian
7 of 12
i,
~:,
tJ Lo~'ation anddimensio~s of landscaping.and open space areas toinc.lude calculation of
landscape coverage
NIlt Open space will not change .
.Ii . . ,.
o Screening in accordance with SDC 4.4-110 NA no screening planned.
o Written description, inc.luding specifications, of the permanent irrigation system
N!A No irrigation system for this project
o Location and type of street trees
N).A Street trees are not part of this project
;
~ List: in chart form the proposed types of landscape materials (trees, shrubs, ground
cov,er). Inc.lude in the chart genus, species, common name, quantity, size, spacing,
and method of planting Installation of below grade pump station and pipe will be
followed with replanting of native vegetation where applicable to restore site to
preconstruction conditions.
See attached sketch of proposed post construction site restoration plantings.
f. Architectural Plans
~ Ext'erior elevations of all buildings and structures proposed for the development site,
including height pump station.' .
Plans for electricalsubstation on mill site included
r - - '.
~ Cohceptual floor 'plans.
Sel} pump station and electrical substation drawings.
g. O'"1-Site Lighting Plan
o Location, orientation, and maximum height of exterior light fixtures, both f~ee standing f
l ~.
ant! attache'd. ..
NIlt No lighting is planned for pump station area. Existing mill area lighting
wi{1 not. ~hange. Substation will have small exterior lights over entry doors.
o Type and extent of shielding, including cut-off angles, and type of illumination,
wattage, and luminous area
NIA
o Ph9tometric test report for each light source NA
PRE-sUBMIlTAl REC'O
MAY . S 2009
o Additional Materials That May be Required
IT IS ,;THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL
STANDARDS/APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE
APPLICANT SHOULD CONSIDER UTILIZING PRE-DEVELOPMENT MEETINGS AS
DISCYSSED IN SDC 5.1-120:
.0
o
~
iWhere a multi-family development is proposed, any additional materials to
[demonstrate compliance with SDC 3.2-240 NA
r "
:Riparian Area Protection Report for properties located within 150 feet of the top of
:bank of any Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WQLW) or within 100 feet of the
,
~op of bank of any direct tributaries of WQLW:
I~ee Joint Permit Application. .
A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be submitted concurrently if
,there are unstable soils and/or a high water table pre~ent .
Where the development area is within an overlay district, address the additional
'standards of the overlay district .
Jl .
o
;, ,
Revised 1/1/08 M'olly.Markarian
!i
j!
,.
8 of 12
[g]
I:, .
If five or more trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling Permit as specified
in SDC 5.19-100
The pipe crossing the slough has been positioned to avoid removal of
existing trees as shown in attached photos. It may be necessary to trim a
. few limbs from one tree closest to the pipe to facilitate construction of pipe
and pipe crossing foundations.
A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon Division of State Lands must be
submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the property.
See wetland study in Joint Permit Application (Attachment B). No impact
:on existing wet lands will be part of this project. ..
Any required federal or state permit must be submitted concurrently or evidence
the permit application has been submitted for review. See Attached
l . .
,Where any grading, filling or excavating is proposed with the development, a Land
and Drainage Alteration permit must be submitted prior to development.
NA No planned grading or filling. Existing natural site contours will remain
.after construction is completed.
Where applicable, any Discretionary Use or Variance as specified in SDC 5.9-100
;and 5.21-100
Nj A Site usage is not changing.
An Annexation application, as specified in SDC 5.7-100, where a development is
!iProposed outside of the city limits but within the City's urban service area and can
be served by sanitary sewer
NjA Notannexmganyproperty
o
[g]
o
o
o
PRE.SUBMITTAl REC'D
MAY 8 2009
Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian
90f12
.NGFIELD .....
~1!L~~l1ZbW
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT I Engineering Division Phone: (541) 726-3753 Fax: (541) 736-1021
MARCH 5, 2004
REQUIRED STORMWATER SCOPING SHEET USE POLICY: Applicationwas submitted for
review. No action required per City Engineer per attached letter dated _May X, 2009
In October 2003, Springfield Public Works released a trial "stormwater scoping sheet," provided to help
engineers and developers meet stormwater requirements in the Springfield Developrnent Code (SDC) and
Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual (EDSPM). After a five month trial period, it became
apparent that users of the scoping sheet submitted much more complete applications than non-users. An
added bonus was a decrease in the overall review tirne spent on the applications, resulting in quicker notice
of decisions.
As a result of the benefits of the scoping sheets,.the City has decided to make their use a mandatory process.
As of April 12,2004, the use of stormwater scoping sheets will be required for all applications which require
development review. All applications submitted to the City shall provide four.c 4) cOpies of a completed
stormwater scoping sheet with the application packet. Attached with this letter is the latest version of the
scopingsheet, which reflects changes requested by the development community.
PLEASE NOTE: SUBMITTED APPLICATIONS WILL NOW BE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT A
COMPLETED STORMW A TER stoPING SHEET, STORMW A TER STUDY AND PLANS IN
CONFORMANCE WITH THE SCOPE REQUIREMENTS
DIRECTIONS FOR USING STORMW A TER SCOPING SHEETS ARE AS FOLLOWS:
1. Obtain scoping sheet from application packet, city website, or other location
2. Fill out project information (top half oUront sheet) prior to commencement of work on stormwater .
study (note: do not sign scoping sheet until it is received from the City with requirements checked).
3. Mail, fax, or email all pages to: City of Springfield, Public Works Dept., Attn: Matt Stouder
4. Receive completed scoping sheet (filled out by the City) indicating minimum requirements for a
complete stormwater study
5. Include four (4) copies of complete scoping sheet (signed by engineer at the bottom .of page 2),
stormwater study and plans that comply with the minimum required scope with submittal of
application packet. The scoping sheet shall be included as an attachment, inside the front cover of
the stormwater study.
Stormwater scoping sheets can be found with all application packets (City website and the Public Works.
front counter) as well as on the Public Works webpage at either:
www.ci.sorinQfield.or.us/Pubworks/whatsnew.htm or under the link for "fillable foniis" at
www.ci.snrinQfield.oLus/PubworkslOesi<m/start.htm. Thank you in advance for working with the City of
Springfield with this new process.
Sincerely,
Matt Stouder, Civil Engineer.
City of Springfield, Public W orks/Engineering
Email: mstouder@ci.springfield.or.us
Phone: (541) 736-1035
Fax: (541) 736-1021
. PRE.SUBMITTAl REC'D
MAY tl 2009
Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian
12
10 of
." !4- ... ., 'II. ." ~ '
~/NGF.11i1JEJ,,- t!I
Fax: (541) 736-1021
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT I Engineering Division.
STORMW A TER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SCOPE OF WORK
----- (Area below this line filled out by Applicant) ---
(Please return to Matt Stouder@ City of Springfield Public Works Engineering; Fax # 736-1021~ Phone # 736-1035.)
Project Name: Mill water intake System Applicant: International Paper Co .
Assessors Parcel #: TL 17-02-3200-001000 Date: April 30, 2009
Land Use(s): Container Board Manufacturing Phone #: 541-741-5700
Project Size (Acres): > I acre Fax #: 541-741-5200
Approx. Impervious Area: (3) areas total 1,874 sq ft Email:
J
Project Description (Include a copy of Assessor's map): This projectwill construct a new in-ground rnill water intake
pumping station adjacent to water intake fish screens constructed during the summer of2008 in the McKenzie River.
The pump station will receive river water through an existing 60" diameter underground pipe frorn the intake screens.
The pump station will include three submersible pumps which pump through an in ground 36" diameter forced main to
, the rnill. The pump station will be located beneath an existing private gravel service road. The reinforced concrete top
;will be at road grade elevation and designed'to support heavy truck loads.. .
Drainage Proposal (Public connection(s), discharge location(s), etc. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary:
The pump station will have an impervious concrete cover of 704 sq ft. at road grade elevation. the quantity of storm
water runoff and direction of flow will be essentially the same as the existing gravel service road. There will be an
impervious area of approximately 162 sq. ft. on the north side ofthe slough at the transition from in ground forced main
to the elevated steel pipe crossing the slough. On the mill side there will be a substation with adjacent covered
eouiDment Dads of aDDroximatelv 1048 so. ft. The substation is located in a lITavel vard area south of a service road.
- {Area below this line filled out bv the Citv and Returned to the AnolicantJ _
(At a minimum, all boxes checked by the City on the front and back of this sheet shall be submitted
for an application to .be complete for submittal, although other requirements may be necessary)
Draina!!e Studv Tvne ffiDSPM Section 4.03.2): (Note. UH mav be substituted for Rational Method)
D Small Site Study - (use Rational Method for calculations)
o Mid-Level Development Study - (use Unit Hydrograph Method for calculations)
o Full Drainage Development Study - (use Unit Hydrograph Method for calculations)
Environmental Considerations:
o Wellhead Zone:
D WetlandlRiparian:
o Soil Type:
Downstream Analvsis: .
o NIA
o Flow line for starting water surface elevation:
o Design HGL to use for starting water surface elevation:
o Manhole/Junction to take analysis to:
D Hillside Development:
o Floodway/Floodplain:
o Other Jurisdictions:
PRE-SUBMIlTAL REC'O.
MAY tnUU::J
Return to Matt Stouder tal City of SoringfieId, email: mstoudertalci.soringfield.or.us, FAX: (541) 736-1021
Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian
11 of 12
COMPLETE STUDY ITEMS I ForOfficialUseOnly
* Based upon the i~form;tion provided on the front of this sheet, the following represents a minimum of what is needed for an
application to be complete for submillal with respecUo drainage; however, this list should not be used in lieu of the Springfield
Development Code (SDC) or the City's Engineering Design Manual. Compliance with these requirements does not constitute site
approval; Additional site specific information may be required Note: Upon scoping sheet submillal, ensure completedform has
been signed in the space provided below:
Interim Design Standards/Water Quality (EDSPM Chapter 3)
Req'd N/A
D D All non-building rooftop (NBR) impervious surfaces shall be pre~treated (e.g. multi-chambered catchbasin w/oil
filtration media) for stormwater quality. Additionally, a minimum of50% of the NBR impervious surface shall be
treated by vegetated methods.
D D Where required, vegetative stormwater design shall be consistent with interim design standards (EDSPM Section 3.02),
set forth by the Bureau of Environmental Services (RES) or Clean Water Services (CWS).
D D For new NBR impervious area less than 15,000 square feet, a slmplified design approach may be followed as specified
by the BES for vegetative treatment.
D D If a stormwater treatment swale is proposed, submit calculations/specifications for sizing, velocity, flow, side slopes;
botto.m slope, and seed mix consistent with either BES or CWS requirements.
D D Water Quality calculations as required in Section 3:03.1 of the EDSPM
D D All building rooftop mounted equipment, or other fiuid containing equipment located outside of the building, shall
be provided with secondary containment or weather resistant enclosure.
General Study Requirements (EDSPM Section 4.03)
D D Drainage study prepared by a Professional Civil Engineer licensed in the state of Oregon.
D D A complete drainage study, as required in EDSPM Section 4.03.1, including a hydrological study map.
D D Calculations showing system capacity for a 2-year storm event and overflow effects of a 25-year storm event.
D D The time of concentration (Tc) shall be determined using a 10 minute start time for developed basins.
Review of Downstream System (EDSPM Section 4.03.4.C)
D D A downstream drainage analysis as described in EDSPM Section 4.03.4.C. On-site drainage shall be governed by the
Oregon Plumbing Specialty Code (OPSe). .
D D Elevations of the HGL and flow lines for both city and private systems where applicable.
Design of Storm Systems (EDSPM Section 4.04)
D D Flow lines, slopes, rim elevations, pipe type and sizes clearly indicated on the plan set.
D D Minimum pipe cover shall be 18 inches for reinforced pipe and 36 inches for plain concrete and plastic pipe materials,
or proper engineering calculations shall be provided when less. The cover shall be sufficient to support an 80,000 1b
load without failure of the pipe structure. ..
D D Manning's "n" values for pipes shall be cqnsistent with Table 4-1 of the EDSP. All storm pipes shall be designed to
achieve a minimum velocity of three (3) feet per second at 0.5 pipe full based on Table 4-1 as well.
OtherlMisc
D
D
D
D
D
D
Existing and proposed contours, located at one foot interval. Include spot elevations and site grades showing how site
drains
Private stormwater easements shall be clearly depicted on plans when private stormwater flows from one property to
another . .
Drywells shall not receive runoff from any surface w/o being treated by one or more BMPs, with the exception of
residential building roofs (EDSP Section 3.03.4.A). Additional provisions apply to this as required by the DEQ. Refer
to the website:www.dea.state.Of.us/wa/P"Toundwaluichome.hcm for more information.
Detention ponds shall be designed to limit runoff to pre-development rates for the 2 through 25-year storm events
D
D
'This form shall be included as an allachment, inside the front cover, of the stormwater study
j
As the engineer of record,. I hereby certity the above required items are complete and included with the submitted stormwater study and
plan set.
Signature:
'IMPORTANT: ENGINEER PLEASE READ BELOW AND SIGN!
Date:
P~~~C'IJ
MAY 8 2009
Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian
12 of 12
INTERNATIONAL@PAPER
. PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'O.
MAY 8 2009
SPRINGFIELD MILL
801 42ND STREET, SPRINGFIELD, OR 97478
PO BOX 700, SPRINGFIELD, OR'97477
T 541-741-5700
F 541-741-5200
SITE PLAN MODIFICATION FOR MILL WATER INTAKE
INTERNATIONAL PAPER, SPRINGFIELD MILL
Weyerhaeuser Company submitted a Joint Permit Application (JPA) to the Corps and DSL in June
2006 to relocate the mill water intake to the main stem of the McKenzie River. A new intake on
the main stem of the river was the only option that would meet the NMFS fish screen criteria for
passing velocity. The project was to consist of a new intake structure and fish screens in the
McKenzie River, a 500+ foot micro-tunnel under the adjacent freeway and Kizer Slough to the
plant site, a new pump station on the' plant site, and a new force main to the existing mill water
system. The necessary permits were issued (Corps No. NWP-1999-279, DSL# 36759-RF) in
August 2007. On August 4,2008 Weyerhaeuser sold their Containerboard division to
International Paper Company which included the entire Springfield mill site.
Work on the project commenced the spring of2008. The caisson for the new pump station was
completed June 2008, and the micro-tunnel machine was set in place in mid-June to bore out to
the new fish screens. The micro-tunneling operation immediately began to have problems and
little progress was made. Attempts to pull the machine back were unsuccessful and the machine
was finally dug out in September 2008. Fortunately, the machine had not reached Kizer Slough,
Construction of the new intake and fish screens began on schedule July I, 2008. Due to the
micro-tunneling problems, the Corps granted a request for an extension to complete the in-water
work by October 31 as allowed by the revised ODFW in-water work guidelines. The intent of the
extension was to allow the micro-tunnel tie-in at the new intakelfish screens to occur as designed.
When it became clear the micro-tunnel would not be completed in a timely manner, the intake
structure and fish screens were completed and sealed off September 30, 2008 and the site restored. .
The project certification, turbidity monitoring, and site restoration reports were submitted to the
Corps and DSL before the dates stipulated in the permits. It was noted in these. reports that the in-
water portion of the project had been completed, but the micro-tunnel had not.
After an extensive review by the consulting engineers, micro-tunneling experts, and the contractor,
it was determined that micro-tunneling is not a viable option at this site. The ground is unstable
and flows too easily for this technology or comparable techniques to work effectively. Steps to
stabilize the material in front of the micro-tunnel machine would not assure success or eliminate
the risk of a blowout or collapse while tunneling under Kizer Slough.
Given that the location of the new fish screens is now fixed and micro-tunneling was eliminated as
an option, the only viable alternative is to construct a pump station adjacent to the fish screens and
route the force main under the Highway 126 bridges and then across Kizer Slough to the plant site~
There are two options to cross Kizer Slough. The first is to install a pipeline about 2,200 feet
along the north side of Kizer Slough to a crossing near the existing fish screens and pumps. This
option is similar to the temporary system the Corps permitted in 2003 (199900279). The second
option is to construct a self supporting pipeline across Kizer Slough approximately where the
micro-tunnel would have been and install the remainder of the new force main on the plant site as
originally planned. The mill selected the self supporting pipeline option as shown in Figure I
because it is a shorter pipe run that can utilize an existing tie-in to the mill water system which
eliminates the need for the mill to'shut down. In addition, the potential impact to areas above the
OHWM but adjacent to Kizer Slough will be significantly less than the first alternative.
Figure 1: Site Overview
International Paper met with repre~entatives from the City of Springfield and the Oregon
Department of Transportation (ODOT) to review their requirements for the new pump station and
a permanent pipeline under the freeway bridges. City building codes require the pump station to
be constructed below grade at this location and ODOT requested that the pipeline be buried under
the bridges. Once the pipeline crosses the slough, the remaining route is essentially identical to
the original plan:
. . PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'O
MAY 8 2009
When the force main reaches the Kizer Slough crossing, it will be converted from a 36 inch HPDE
underground line to a 36 inch above ground steel line. The span across Kizer Slough will be
supported on each bimk by a pair of pilings with a cross memb.er and anchored on the mill side of
the slough. Six conduits will be attacq.ed to the force main to carry electrical, communication, and
air lines from the mill to the new pump station. The bottom of the line will be about 6 inches
higher than the bottom of the freeway bridges and a foot above the 500 year flood elevation.
International Paper contacted the Corps regarding jurisdiction and permits for the pipeline crossing
of the slough. The Corps concluded that the Coast Guard had jurisdiction and permitting
responsibility for crossings ohhis nature. International Paper contacted William Pratt, Coast
Guard bridge administrator. for the 13th district which includes Oregon. After explaining the
location and scope of the proposed pipe crossing, Mr. Pratt confmned that the. Coast Guard has
jurisdiction, but indicated a permit would not be required for this installation. The waterway at the
location of the pipeline crossing qualifies for an exemption from bridge permitting via Section 107
of the Coast Guard Authorization Act of 1982 (33 D.S.C. 530). Additionally, the elevated
pipeline would qualify for an exemption because it would not hinder use.ofKizer Slough by
expected boat traffic (rafts, drift boats, small jet boats, etc.).
All of.the remaining work will be above the ordinary high water mark (OHWM). Based on our
investigations, we.estimated the OHWM elevation at this site is 471.5-472.0 feet. The lowest
elevation for planned work is 475 feet to provide an adequate cushion and room for protective
measures. The wetlands delineation for the original project submitted as part of the JP A included
the entire area of the proposed changes and no wetlands will be disturbed or impacted due to these
changes. International Paper will adhere to all.ofthe applicable terms and condition~ specified in
the Joint Permit Application (JP A) and permits for the original project issued by the Corps and
Oregon Division of State Lands (DSL). The Stormwater Management and Sediment and Erosion
Control Plans submitted with the JPA"and applicable NMFS Slope III construction BMPs and
conservation enhancement measures (e.g. silt fences, straw bales, etc.) will be.implemented to
ensure there are no impacts to the McKenzie River or Kizer Slough water quality from
construction activities. Where it is appropriate, disturbed areas will be hydro-seeded or replanted
with native vegetation. One tree may need to be trimmed or removed near the north end of the
. .
pIpe crossmg.
PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D
MAY S 2009
SPRINGFIELD
CONTAlNERBOARD
. 801 42nd ...._1
SPRINGFIELD, OR 87478
RIVER WATER INTAICII . FIlM __u PROJECT
SlIT nFSCRIPTlnN
AS:SESStR'SIUf'NllI7-C12-zt-o::l TAXlOTNO,2SIOO
ZCNNC:Hl-I€AVYNJlJS1RIAL
CCOESUsm I8C2003DllllCH_/OREOOMIIE'ofSI(JG
t.IEOWDCAl. DLClRICAL II: PUMJNG BY SD'ARA1t POUT
NOHH
SITE
_..,;O-Y1"I
~~!!
)
i
VICINITY MAP
-
-~-
L-
UY PLAN
-
L
PRE-sUBMIlTAl ~EC'O
MAY 8 2009
INTERNATIONAL (1) PAPER
SPRINGFIELD MILL
801 42" STREET, SPRINGFIELD, OR 97478
PO BOX 700, SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477
. T 541-741-5700
F 541-741-5200
April 30, 2009
Benny Dean Jr.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Eugene Field Office/County
1600 Executive Parkway, Suite 210
Eugene, OR 97401-2156
RE: MODIFICATION OF CORPS PERMIT NO. NWP-1999-279, AUGUST 30, 2007
INTERNATIONAL PAPER, SPRINGFIELD MILL, MILL WATER INTAKE
Dear Mr. Dean,
Weyerhaeuser Company submitted a Joint Permit Application (JP A) to the Corps and DSL in June
2006 to relocate the mill water intake to the main stem of the McKenzie River so thatthe intake
would meet the NMFS fish screen criteria for passing velocity. The project consisted of a new
intake structure and fish screens in the McKenzie River, a 500+ foot micro-tunnel under the
adjacent freeway and Kizer Slough to the plant site, a new pump station on the plant site, and a
new force main to the existing mill water system. The necessary permits were issued (Corps No.
NWP-1999-279, DSL# 36759-RF) in August 2007. On August 4,2008 Weyerhaeuser sold their
Containerboard division to International Paper Company which included the entire Springfield
mill site. .
Work on the project commenced the spring of2008. The calsson for the new pump station was
completed June 2008, and the micro-tunnel machine was set in place in mid-June to bore out to
the new fish screens. The micro-tunnelirig operation immediately began to have problems and
little progress was made. Attempts to pull the machine back were unsuccessful and the machine
was finally dugout in September 2008. Fortunately, the machine had not reached Kizer Slough:
Construction of the new intake and fish screens began on schedule July I, 2008. Due.to:the
micro-tunneling problems, a request for an extension to complete the in-water work.by October 31
was granted as allowed by the revised ODFW in-water work guidelines. The intent of the
extension was to allow the micro-tunnel tie-in at the new intake/fish screens to. occur as designed.
When it became clear the micro-tunnel would not Qe completed in a timely manner, the intake
structure and fish screens weie completed and sealed off September 30, 2008 and the site restored.
The project certification, turbidity monitoring, and site restoration reports were submitted to the
Corps and DSL before the dates stipulated in the permits. It was noted in these reports that the iri-
water portion of the project had been completed, but the micro-tuhnel had not.
PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D .
MAY 8 2009
After an extensive review by the consulting engineers, micro-tunneling experts, and the contractor,
it was determined that micro-tunneling is not a viable option at this site. The ground is unstable
and flows too easily for this technology or comparable techniques to work effectively. Steps to
stabilize the material in front of the micro-tunnel machine would not assure success or eliminate
the risk of a blowout or collapse while tunneling under Kizer Slough.
Given that the site of the new fish screens is fixed and micro-tunneling was eliminated as an
option, the only viable alternative is to construct a pump station adjacent to the fish screens and
route the force main under the Highway 126 bridges and then across Kizer Slough to the plant site.
There are two options to cross Kizer Slough. The first is to install a pipeline about 2,200 feet
along the north side of Kizer Slough to a crossing nearthe existing fish screens and pumps. This
option is similar to the temporary system permitted May 5, 2003 (199900279) for five years. The
second option is to construct a self supporting pipeline across Kizer Slough approximately where
the micro-tunnel would have been and install the remainder of the new force main on the plant site
as originally planned. The mill selected the self supporting pipeline option as shown in Figure I
because it is a shorter pipe run that can utilize an existing tie-in to the mill water system which
eliminates the need for the mill to shut down. In addition, the potential impact to areas above the
OHWM but adjacent to Kizer Slough will be significantly less than the first alternative.
Figure 1: Site Overview
REC'D
MAY 8 2009
International Paper met with representatives from the City of Springfield and the Oregon
Department of Transportation (ODOT) to review their requirements for the new pump station and
a permanent pipeline under the freeway bridges. A set of drawings for the revised pump station
and pipeline route which we believe will meet the approval of both entities are in Attachment A.
City building codes require the pump station to.be constructed below grade at this location and
ODOT requested that the pipeline be buried under the bridges. Pictures,?fthe pump station
location and the pipe route under the bridges are shown in Attachment B. The pipelines in the
pictures. were used for the temporary permit. Once the pipeline crosses the slough, the remaining.
. route is essentially identical to the original plan. .
When the force main reaches theXizer Slough crossing, it will be converted from a 36 inch HPDE
underground line to a 36 inch above ground steel line. The span across Kizer Slough will be
supported on each bank by a pairof pilings with a cross member and anchored on the mill side of
the slough. Six conduits will be attached to the force main to carry electrical, communication, and
air lines from the mill to the new pump station. The bottom of the line will be about 6 inches
higher than the bottom of the freeway bridges and afoot above the 500 year flood elevation.
International Paper contacted the Corps regarding jurisdiction and permits for the pipeline crossing
.of the slough. The Corps concluded that the ~oast Guard had jurisdiction and permitting
responsibility for crossings of this nature. International Paper contacted William Pratt, Coast
Guard bridge administrator for the 13th district which includes Oregon. After explaining the
location and scope of the proposed pipe crossing, Mr. Pratt confinned that the Coast Guard has
jurisdiction, but indicated a permit would not be required for this installation. The waterway at the
location of the pipeline crossing qualifies for an exemption from bridge permitting via Section 107
of the Coast Guard Authorization Act of 1982 (33 D.S.C. 530). Additionally, the elevated
pipeline would qualifY for an exemption 'because it would not hinder use of Kizer Slough by
expected boat traffic (rafts, drift boats, small jet boats, etc.). Mr. Pratt confirmed this,
understanding in an e-mail dated April 21, 2009 which is shown in Attachment C" .
All of the remaining w~rk will be above the ordinary high water mark (OHWM). Based on our
investigations, we estimated the OHWM elevation at this site is 471.5-472.0 feet: The lowest
elevation for planned work is 475 feet to provide an adequate cushion and room for protective
measures. The wetlands delineation for the original project submitted as part of the JP A included
the entire area of the proposed changes and no wetlands will be disturbed or impacted due to these
changes. International Paper will adhere to all of the applicable terms and conditions specified in
the Joint Permit Application (JP A) and permits for the original project issued by the Corps and
Oregon Division of State Lands (DSL). The Stormwater Management and Sediment and Erosion
Control Plans submitted with the JP A and applicable NMFS Slope III construction BMPs and
conservation enhancement measures (e.g. silt fences, straw bales, etc.) will be.implemented to
ensure there are no impacts to the McKenzie River or Kizer Slough water quality from
construction activities. Where it is appropriat~, disturbed areas will be hydro-seeded or replanted
with native vegetation. One tree maymeed to be trimmed or removed near the north end of the
. .
pipe crossmg.
PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'O
MAY 8 2009
International Paperrequests that perri1.it NWP-1999-279 be modified to include the changes to the
p1ill water pump station and pipeline to the plant site discussed in this letter. International Paper
plans to complete the remaining portion of this project during the summer of 2009, but requests
that the pertnit modification authorization be valid for two years. Your prompt attention to this
matter will be greatly appreciated. If you have any questions, concerns, or corrections, please call
, . .
me at 541-741-5702.' . .
Sincerely,
Loren Leighton
Senior Environmental Project Engineer
PRE-SUBMITTAL REC'D
MAY 8 2009