The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutComments PWE 10/23/2007 Memorandum I: City of Springfield I: Date: October 23, 2007 / To: From: Subject: Andy Limbird, Urban Planner Jesse Jones, Civil Engineer SUB2007-00053, Syrios Partition I have reviewed the materials provided with the subject application. The recommended findings and conditions outlined below are provided for your use in prepafing the land-use decision. 1,. SANITARY SEWER ' /Finding: Section 4.3-105.A of the SDC requires that sanitary sewers shall ,be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing maihs. Additionally, installation of sanitary sewers shall provide sufficient access for maintenance activities. , , , , I Finding: Parcel 1 is served by an existing sewer lateral from the' 8" sewer,main in Union Terrace. The applicant proposes to serve parcel 2 with a sanitary sewer lateral from the " 8" main located in Union Terrace. ~. .; . . STORMW ATER MANAGEMENT Finding: Section 4.3-11O.B of the SDC requires that the Approval Authority shall grant development approval only where adequate public and/or private stormwater management systems provisions have been made as determined by the Pu~lic Works Director, consistent with the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual (EDSPM).ir Finding: Section 4.3-11O.D of the SDC requires that run-off from a development shall be ,/ directed to an approved stormwater management system with sufficient capacity to accept the discharge. Finding: Section 4.3-110.E of the SDC requires new developments to employ drainage ./management practices, which minimize the amount and rate of surface water run-off into receiving streams, and which promote water quality. . . / Finding: The applicant proposes to continue to disperse roof runoff from Parcell onsite, via splash blocks. j Finding: The applicant proposes to direct roof runoff from Parcel 2 to a drywe11. WATER OUALlTY j. 'Finding: Under Federal regulation of the Clean Water Act (CWA), Endang~red Species Act (ESA), and National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES), the City. of I' I Date Received:~/?<l'7_ Planner: AL i! " j, Springfield has obtained a Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit. A provision ofthis permit requires the City demonstrate efforts to reduce th~ pollution in urban stormwater to the Maximum Extent Practicable (MEP). r . Finding: Federal and Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (ODEQ) rules / require the City's MS4 plan address six "Minimum Control MeasUres." ~inimum . Control Measure 5, "Post-Construction Stormwater Management for NeJ Development and Redevelopment," applies to the proposed development. I: I, Finding: Minimum Control Measure 5 requires the City of Springfield to develop, implement and enforce a program to ensure the reduction of pollutants in ihormwater j runoff to the MEP. The City must also develop and implement strategies ithat include a . " . combination of structural or non-structural Best Management Practices (BMPs) appropriated for the community.' . .' Ii ' Finding: Minimum Control Measure 5 requires the City of Springfie~d us! an ordinance . / or other regulatory mechanism to address post construction runoff from n~w and re- development projects to the extent allowable under State law. Regu1atoryjlmechanisms used by the City include the Springfield Development Code (SDC), the City's Engineering Design Standard~ and Procedures Manual (EDSPM) and the future Stormwater Facilities Master Plan (SFMP). II Finding: As required in Section 4.3-11O.E of the SDC, "a development sI1~ll be required to employ drainage management practices approved by the Public Works Director and 'I consistent with Metro Plan policies and the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual." '. I; j J Finding: Section 3.02 ~fthe City's EDSPM states the Public Works Depahment will accept, as interim design standards for stormwater quality, water quality f~ci1ities designed pursuant to the policies and procedures of either the City of Portland (BES), or the Clean Water Services (CWS). 1: PUBLIC STREETS. SIDRW ALKS & IMPROVRMRNT AGREEMRNrS Finding: Section 4.2-1 05.G.2 of the Springfield Development Code requires that whenever a proposed land division or development will increase traffic ori' the City street j system and that development has any unimproved street frontage abuttingi:a' fully improved street, that street frontage shall be fully improved to City specifications. Exception (i) notes that in cases of unimproved streets, an Improvement A!'greement shall be required as a condition of Development Approval postponing improvements until such time that a City street improvement projectis initiated. ' J Cu-J,I Condition: Prior to approval ofthe Final Plat, the applicant shall execute and record an Improvement Agreement for Union Terrace for curb, gutter, side~alk, storm sewer and street lighting. ' . Ii Date Received: /rl-M07 Planner: A~ Ii , II Ii I: I' . UTILIT-IES. EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY Ii Finding: Section 4.3-130.A ofthe Springfield Development Code requird each development area to be provided with a water system having sufficiently ~ized mains and '/ lesser lines to furnish adequate supply to the development and sufficient ~pcess for maintenance. Springfield Utility Board coordinates the design of the water system within Springfield city limits. Ii Finding: Section 4.3-140.A of the SDC requires applicants proposing dev~lopments make arrangements with the City and each utility provider for the dedication of utility easements necessary to fully service the development or land beyond the development area. The minimum width for public utility easements adjacent to street rights of ways /shall be 7 feet. The minimum width for all other public utility easements khall be7 feet. . The Public Works Director may require a larger easement to allow for ad~quate ' . . i maintenance. t 7inding: A 7.0' P.U.E. is required along the frontage ofParc,e1s 1 and 2 adjacerit to ../ Union Terrace per Section 4.3-140.A of the SDC , ]: c " Ii /condi/ion: Dedicate a 7.0' P.U.E. along the frontage of Parcels 1 and ,2 adjacent to . Union Terrace per Section 4.3-140.A ofthe SDC. ii . I' " , OTHER PERMITS OTHER i NOTE: The intent of this list is to give a developer insight about requiremi;mts related to public improvements before they develop their property. ii . FEES AND PERMITS !i. I II SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT CHARGE: i. I" Pay applicable Systems Development Charges when building permits are ;issued for developments within the City limits or within the Springfield Urban Gro~ Boundary. (The cost relates to the amount of increase in impervious surface area, traAsportation trip " rates, and plumbing fixture units. Some exceptions apply to Springfield Urban Growth areas.) [Springfield Code Chapter 11, Article 11] i , Systems Development Charges (SDC's) will apply to the construction of buildings and site improvements within the subject site. The Charges will be based upoh the rates in effect at the time of permit submittal for buildings or site improvements oh each portion v or phase of the development. I' " I' . SANITARY SEWER IN-LIEU-OF-ASSESSMENT CHARGE: . , " Pay a Sanitary Sewer In-Lieu-of-Assessment charge in addition to the re~lar co~ection fees if the property or portions ofthe property being developed have not Jreviously been Date Raceived: /~h~ ~ Plann~r: AL /' I: " " , assessed or otherwise participated in the cost of a public sanitary sewer. Contact the Engineering Division to determine ifIn-Lieu-of-Assessment charge is applicable. lOrd ," . , 5584] PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE FEES. It is the responsibility of the private developer to fund the public iniTastrufture. , " OTHER CITY PERMITS: . _ , l' EncroacIllnent Permit or Sewer Hookup Permit (working within right-of-~ay or public easements) example: new tap to the public storm or sanitary sewer, or adjusting a . ' I . manhole. [The current rate is $135 for processing' plus applicable fees and deposits] . . I Land & Drainage Alteration Permits (LDAP). [Contact the Springfield P~b1ic Works Department @ 726-5849 for appropriate app1ications/requirements] Ii I ADDITIONAL PERMITS/APPROV ALS MAY BE NECESSARY: I, ,. . Metropolitan Wastewater Management Commission (Pump statidh, sanitary sewers 24 inches or larger) . Ii . Lane County Facilities Permit (If the project is within Lane County jurisdiction) · Railroad (If the project crosses a railroad) ]: . Oregon Department of Transportation (If the project is within ODOT jurisdiction) . Division of State Lands (Storm water discharge, wetlands) Ii ' . Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (Erosion control (5 acres or greater), pump station, storm water discharge, wetlands) Ii . U.S, Army Corps ofJ;:ngineers (Storm water discharge, wetlands) ': . . I I: , Ii I: \ Date Re~eived:_/~/23/~ Planner: I'AL Ii I' jl