Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNotice PLANNER 5/5/2009 '''' , .:-\ ." , ";~Ir-<\,... ~ RECEIVED . MAY 5 2009 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE STATE OF OREGON) )ss. County of lane ) BY:'l~0 ~ 'Ucw.d ~cD . !6-f & p~ I, Karen laFleur, being first duly sworn, do hereby depose and say as follows: 1. I state that I am a Program Technician for the Planning Division of the Development Services Department, City of Springfield, Oregon., 2. I state that in my capacity as, Program Technician, I prepared and caused to be mailed copies ot12.RI'?/}~-OCO/3 7)tJ:tJA1 dAJ:Ju.~A1.Mx ) -" 'rY\D5 - ~~ . (See attachment "A") on ~/ ". . 2009 addressed to (see ~ 'rYL~ Attachment B"), by causing said 'letters t9 be placed in a U.S. mail box with ( 'K~ postage fully prepaid thereon. '1< (J),.LM.-- JI as!1- ----fJ,lA.^__ KA~~N LaFLEUR V)' STATE OF OREGON, County of lane '-11} dJA' / I . 2009. Personally appeared the above named Karen laFleur, , . Prograr6!Technician;' who acknowledged the foregoing instrument to ,be their voluntary act Before me: .' " .. , , OFFICIAL SEAL DEYETTE KELLY NOTARY PUBLIC. OREGON COMMISSION NO. 420351 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES AUG, 15, 2011 ~; ~);tl My Commission Expires: 'it jJ~// I TYPE I TENTATIVE MINIMUM DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, STAFF REPORT & DECISION Project Name: Midtown Mixed Martial Arts Nature of Application: Martia] Arts Academy, gym and fight club Case Number: DRC2009-000] 3 Project Location: 2600 Main Street, ]7-03-36-41/00700 and 70] Current Site Conditions: Former]y a payday loan office, audio shop and hot tub reconditioning in separate rental units Zoning: CC Community Commercia] Metro Plan Designation: Commercia] Zoning of Surrounding Properties: North-CC, South-HI Heavy Industrial, East-CC and West-CC Application Submitted Date: 4113/09 Site Visit Conducted Date: 4/22/09 Decision Issued Date: May 5, 2009 Decision: Approved Associated Applications: 96-06-120 Site Plan Review for construction of building I CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TEAM I POSITION REVIEW OF I Project Manager Planning I Transportation Planning Engineer Transportation I Public Works Civil Engineer Utilities, Sanitary & Storm Sewer I I I Deputy Fire Marshal I Fire and Life Safety I Community Services Plans Examiner I Bui]ding NAME Tara Jones Jon Driscoll Eric Walter I PHONE 736-1003 I 726-3679 736-]03] Gilbert Gordon ' Chris Carpenter, 726-2293 744-4153 I APPLICANT'S DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TEAM Owner: Applicant/Business Owner: Peter Kyrl Rex and Benjamin Scoggins 3474 Spring Blvd, 2465 E Street Eugene, OR 97405 Springfield, OR 97477 1 Purpose: Minimum Development Standards (MDS) are intended to support economic development by minimizing City review for minor additions, expansions or changes in use. MDS shall ensure compliance with specific appearance; transportation safety and efficiency; and sHlrmwater management standards specified in the Springfield Development Code (SDC) and otherwise protect public health, safety and welfare. ' Criteria of Approval: ]n order to grant MDS approval, the Director shall determine compliance with all applicable standards specified below: Applicable Special Use Standards: li!iI Complies as Shown on Plot Plan Proposal Complies when the following Condition(s) is! are met: Note: Tax Lot 701 is not a legally created lot. The 9wner must have a Partition approved in order to create it as a legal parcel that can be sold separately from Tax Lot 700. 1) A five-foot wide landscaped planter strip, including street trees, with approved irrigation or approved drought resistant plants as specified in SDC Sections 4.4-100-105 shall be installed between the sidewalk and parking areas or buildings. L2l Complies as Shown on Plot Plan li!iI Proposal Complies when the following Condition(s) is! are met: 2) Trash receptacles and outdoor storage areas shall be screened by a structure or enclosure permanently affixed to the ground as specified in SDC Section 4.4-110B3c. ~ Complies as Shown on Plot Plan Proposal Complies when the following Condition(s) is! are met: Note: No outside trash receptacles are proposed. If in the future one is'proposed, it must meet the requirements of SDC Section 4.4-110B3c and any other codes in effect at the time. 3) Bicycle parking spaces shall be added to meet the numerical standards for the appropriate use or upgraded to meet the standards set in SDC Sections 4.6-140-145 and 155., ~ Complies as Shown on Plot Plan Proposal Complies when the following Condition(s) is! are met: 2 4) Parking and circulation areas shall be paved and striped arid wheel stops installed as specified in SDC Sections 4.6-100-110 and 120. Required paving and other impervious surfaces on the site shall comply with on-site stormwater management standards as specified in SDC Section 4.3-110-115. l2J Complies as Shown on Plot Plan Ii@ Proposal Complies when the following Condition(s) is! are met: 5) Access onto the public right-of-way shall comply with SDC Section 4.2-120. I2l Complies as Shown on Plot Plan Proposal Complies when the following Condition(s) is! are met: 6) Concrete sidewalks shall be installed where the site abuts a curb and gutter street as specified in SDC Section 4.2-135. ' l2J Complies as Shown on Plot Plan Proposal Complies when the following Condition(s) is/ are met: 7) Streetlights shall be installed as specified in SDC Section 4.2-145. l2J Complies as Shown on Plot Plan li!iI Proposal Complies when the following Condition(s) is! are met: 8) The development shall connect to public utilities as specified in Sections 4.3-105 and 120- 140 of the SDC and. comply with the Springfield Building Safety Codes, where applicable. Easements may be required as specified in Subsection 4.3-140 of this Code. 3 I2J Complies as Shown on Plot Plan ffi!l Proposal Complies when the following Condition(s) is! are met: Timelines and Conditions of Approval: The property owner and/or applicant has 30 days from the date ofthis decision to submit a Final Plot Plan demonstrating compliance with the following Conditions of Approval: No Conditions of Approval In order to complete the review process, a Development Agreement is required within 45 days from the date of this decision to ensure the terms and conditions of this application are binding upon both the. applicant and the City. This agreement will be prepared by Staff and upon approval of the Fina] Plot Plan, must be signed by the property owner prior to issuance of a building permit. THE APPLICANT MAY SUBMIT CONSTRUCTION OR BUILDING PLANS TO OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS FOR REVIEW PRIOR TO FINAL PLOT PLAN APPROVAL IN ACCORDANCE WlTH SDC 5.] 7~135 AT THE]R OWN RISK ALL CONCURRENT SUBM]TT ALS ARE SUBJECT TO REVIS]ON FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FINAL PLOT PLAN. A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SDC 5.17-]40 WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL PLANS SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT HAVE BEEN REV]SED. CONFLICTING PLANS CAUSE DELAYS. The construction of the required improvements shall begin within 90 days of the date ofihis decision. If the established time line cannot be met, the applicant may submit a written request for a time line extension as specified in SDC Section 5.15-1258. The Director may allow a one-time extension of the 90-day start of construction time line due to situations including but not limited to, required permits from the City or other agencies, weather conditions and the unavailability of asphalt or the unavailability of street trees. If the time extension is allowed, security shall be provided as specified in SDC Section 5.] 7-150 of this Article. The time line extension' shall not exceed 90 days. If the established time line is not met and the applicant has not requested an extension, the Director shall declare the application null and void if the property is occupied and the property owner shall be considered in violation of this Code. Ifthe established time line is not met and the applicant has requested an extension and that time line has not been met, the Director may require the improvements be installed as specified in SDC Section 5.17-] 50D. PERMITS THAT MAYBE REQUIRED: . All new sewer taps will require permits from the Public Works Department prior to connection. Sidewalks and driveway curb cuts and closures require permits from the Public Works Department. Building permits will be required for the construction of the building and the 'paving of the parking ~ . An LOAP permit will be required for all grading, filling and excavating being done. Sign Permit-NOTE: Signs are regulated by the Springfield Municipal Code Article 9, Chapter7. The number and placement of signs must be coordinated with the Community Services Division. The location of signs on a Site Plan does not constitute approval from the Community Services Division. . . . . 4 Additional Information: The application, all documents, and evidence relied upon by the applicant, and the applicable criteria of approval are available for free inspection and copies are available for a fee at the Development Services Department, 225 Fifth Street, Springfield, Oregon. Appeals: This Typ~ I decision is exempt from the provisions ofORS ]97.]95, ]97.763 and 227.173 and therefore cannot be subject to the appeal provisions of SDC Article 15, Appeals. In the event the applicant disagrees with the application of the development standards in this decision, the applicant may request a Type III Formal Interpretation Or a Type II Site Plan Review application. Questions: Please call Tara Jones in the Planning Division of the Development Services Department at (541) 736-1003 if you have any questions regarding this process. 5 :'