The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutNotes, Work PLANNER 2/10/2006 , TYPE II TENTATIVE LAND DIVISION, PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Project Name: "Skychief Park" Tentative Subdivision Plan Project Proposal: Subdivide an MDR parcel into 6 lots (including 4 panhandle lots) Case Number: PRE2006-00016 Project Address: 232 S. 42nd Street, Springfield Assessors Map and Tax Lot Number(s}: 17-02-32-33 TL#2100, 2101 Zoning: MDR Applicable Refinement Plan: Mid-Springfield Refinement Plan Designation: MDR Pre-Submittal Meeting Date: February 10, 2006 Application Submittal Deadline: August 9, 2006 Associated Applications: NONE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TEAM I POSITION I Proiect ManaQer I Transportation PlanninQ EnQineer I Public Works Civil EnQineer I Public Works EIT I Deputy Fire Marshall I Communitv Services Manaqer REVIEW OF PlanninQ Transportation Utilities Sanitarv & Storm Sewer Fire and Life Safetv BuildinQ NAME Andv Limbird Garv McKenney Matt Stouder Matt Stouder Gilbert Gordon Dave Puent PHONE 726-3784 726-4585 736-1035 736-1035 726-2293 726-3668 APPLICANT'S DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TEAM. Owner Don Haase Twin Butte Mortgage lnc. 1960 Gilham Road EUQene, OR 97401 Applicant Marvin Krush Krush & Associates 54 Centennial Loop EUQene, OR 97401 2/1 0/06 Date: Received: 2/;!;w>t Planner: AL I TENTATIVE LAND DIVISION APPLICATION PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST PLANNING o Application Fee discuss the applicable fees o One additional copy of the Land Division Plan reduced to 8'12"x 11" Complete lncomplete See Notes ~ 0 0 8 V2" X 11" Copy of Land Division Plan o Copy of the deed and a preliminary title report issued within the past 60 days documenting ownership and listing all encumbrances. If the applicant is not the property owner, written permission from the property owner is required. Complete lncomplete See Notes o ~ ~ o Tentative Land Division Plan Complete lncomplete See Notes f2] 0 0 0 f2] f2] 0 f2] f2] o f2] f2] f2] o o o f2] f2] f2] o f2] 2/10/06 Deed and Preliminary Title Report Prepared by an Oregon Licensed Land Surveyor in accordance with ORS 92 All existing and proposed easements Dimensions and size of each parcel and the approximate dimensions of each building site indicating the top and toe of cut and fill slopes to scale Location, widths and names of all existing and proposed streets, alleys, dedications or other right-of- ways within or adjacent to the proposed land division Location of existing and required traffic control devices, fire hydrants, power poles, transformers, neighborhood mailbox units and similar public facilities Location and width of all existing and proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways and bike trails Location, size and type of plantings and street trees in any required planter strip Date Received: J-/;(;uo6 Planner: AL --; 2 o f2] f2] Location and size of existing and proposed utilities on and adjacent to the site including sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV. lndicate the proposed connection points o Phased Development Plan required if redivision is proposed. The plan must include the boundaries and sequencing of each proposed redivision. Any redivision must progress in a sequence promoting street connectivity between the various phases of the development and accommodating other required public improvements. Complete lncomplete See Notes ~ 0 0 Phased Development Plan Notes: As noted here and at Additional Materials, Applications and Permits below, the following information is required for re-submittal: 1. Provide current title report with re-submitted tentative subdivision plan (not more than 30 days old). 2. Provide copy of easement document 2002-013998 with tentative subdivision plan re-submittal. 3. lndicate required 7' PUE along 41st Place and 42nd Street frontages on the tentative subdivision plan. 4. An additional PUE will be required for the existing 12" watermain along the 42nd Street frontage. 5. Private drainage easements will be required to accommodate the drainage swales and 6" stormwater lines that run across multiple property lines within the site. 6. Show adjacent legal lot line and easement information on tentative subdivision plan to establish site context. 7. Please show building site envelopes for each proposed parcel with appropriate front, side and rear yard setbacks. 8. Please show building footprint for existing house including setback dimensions from proposed property lines. 9. At least 4 street trees will be required along both the 41st Place and 42nd Street frontages of this development site. The proposed street tree locations and species shall be indicated on the tentative subdivision plan. 10.Existing trees that are to be removed or to remain shall be labeled accordingly on the site assessment of existing conditions map. l1.A separated sidewalk will be required along the 42nd Street frontage, and this should be indicated on the tentative subdivision plans. 12.Proposed water servicing not shown on tentative plan. All utilities shall be placed underground and stubbed to the building envelope area of each proposed parcel. Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application: 2/10/06 Date Received:~/.;Ia?b Planner: AL 3 o Proposal does not meet the requirements of the MDR district for at least 10 units per developable acre unless the City accepts the 30' proposed road right-of-way dedication. If 30' dedication is not accepted, an application for variance or modification of provisions will be required. o Stormwater management plan tentative plan does not match tentative subdivision plan (ie. proposed 30' ROW dedication not shown). o Any trees to be retained on site shall be indicated on the tentative subdivision plan. o Fences proposed for removal should not be indicated on the tentative subdivision plan, but shall remain on the site assessment of existing conditions. o All driveways to serve the existing and proposed dwellings shall be paved. o The existing driveway that is to be abandoned shall be landscaped and the curb cut replaced with vertical face curb and gutter. o Proposed street trees as shown on landscape plan should be acceptable for this development. o -GGAfifrnci.;ul1 should be provided frnm nnnT that thp propgsed dr-ive\<vay Hlrving bGts~-5 is covcred~-ilj3f}fWc-h-permit~ o It is recommended that utilities for the existing house are placed underground at the time the other lots are serviced. o A geotechnical report may be required for building foundations that intersect the abandoned drywell. o It doesn't appear there is an existing gravel driveway on the south boundary of the site. 2/10/06 DatE'J Raceived: 7!~/.;;oot Planner: AL 4 P/<"Gz.PP{;_()t-~d'(, 1I1f11~ t:: J 6t./.Bt>;'. .../ ON ~I/p/,,(, ~,M?.Ke7VN~ TENTATIVE LAND DIVISION APPLICATION PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST TRANSPORTATION N '('~"/Ri9ht-of-Way Approach Permit application must be provided where the property has /' frontage on an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) facility. Complete lncomplete See Notes 00 Copy of ROW approach Permit Application ~ iJ 1I . ~ /' Traffic Impact Study-four copies of a study prepared by a Traffic Engineer in ~ accordance with SDC Section 32.020(1}(c). Traffic lmpact Studies (TIA) allow the City to analyze and evaluate the traffic impacts and mitigation of a development on the City's transportation system. ln general, a TlA must explain how the traffic from a given development affects the transportation system in terms of safety, traffic operations, access and mobility, and immediate and adjoining street systems. A TlA must also address, if needed, City, metro plan and state land use and transportation policies and objectives. Complete lncomplete See Notes ~ ~ Traffic impact Study ~ LID o Tentative Land Division Plan Complete lncomplete See Notes l.DI Location and type of existing and proposed street lighting ~ 0J [fJ 152: fl3 (,) Location, widths and names of all existing and proposed streets, alleys, dedications or other right-of- ways within or adjacent to the proposed land division ~ F.I LB. G'J..>"".. l5f Location of existing and required traffic control devices Notes: (Il lZow P~op()7eD H;fID ta./"? r{N V /f~~ /'/Or ~N?/7r(;;!Nr IIMO/V!; pt,.,t!N -jlfli::t=:/':). Date Fleceived: z/,c/iU'ot Planner: AL / / 7121/04 4 TENTATIVE LAND DIVISION APPLICATION PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING o Site Assessment of Existing Conditions Complete lncomplete See Notes f2] 0 0 f2] 0 0 f2] 0 0 o f2] f2] f2] o o f2] o o f2] o o f2] o o f2] o o 211 0/06 Prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect or Engineer Vicinity Map The name, location and dimensions of all existing site features including buildings, curb cuts, trees and impervious surface areas, clearly indicating what is remaining and what is being removed Required setbacks to the proposed new property lines for existing structures to remain on site The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and top of bank of all watercourses and required riparian setback that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map on file in the Development Services Department The 100-year floodplain and flood way boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood lnsurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment or Letter of Map Revision The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in Article 17 of the Springfield Development Code and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file in the Development Services Department Physical features including, but not limited to trees 5" in diameter or greater when measured 4 V2 feet above the ground, significant clusters of trees and shrubs, riparian areas, wetlands and rock outcroppings Soil types and water table information as mapped and specified in the Soils Survey of Lane County. A Geotechnical Report prepared by an Engineer must be submitted concurrently if the Soils Survey indicates the proposed development area has unstable soils and/or a high water table Date Received: :z-rO;/;;<:'?b Planner: AL 6 0 Tentative Land Division Plan Complete lncomplete See Notes f2] 0 0 Prepared by an Oregon Licensed Land Surveyor in accordance with ORS 92 0 f2] f2] All existing and proposed easements 0 f2] f2] Dimensions and size of each parcel and the approximate dimensions of each building site indicating the top and toe of cut and fill slopes to scale f2] 0 0 Location and type of existing and proposed street lighting 0 f2] f2] Location, widths and names of all existing and proposed streets, alleys, dedications or other right-of- ways within or adjacent to the proposed land division f2] 0 0 Location of existing and required traffic control devices, fire hydrants, power poles, transformers, neighborhood mailbox units and similar public facilities f2] 0 0 Location and width of all existing and proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways and bike trails 0 f2] f2] Location, size and type of plantings and street trees in any required planter strip f2] 0 0 Location and size of existing and proposed utilities on and adjacent to the site including sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV. Indicate the proposed connection points 0 Grading and Paving Plan Complete lncomplete See Notes f2] 0 0 Prepared by an Oregon Licensed Civil Engineer f2] 0 0 Planting plan prepared by an Oregon Licensed Landscape Architect where plants are proposed as part of the stormwater management system f2] 0 f2] Roof drainage patterns and discharge locations f2] 0 0 Pervious and impervious area drainage patterns 2110/06 Date Received: Planner: AL ZhO/)<<)6 / / 7 f2] 0 0 The size and location of stormwater management systems components, including but not limited to: drain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention ponds; stormwater quality measures; and natural drainageways to be retained 0 0 0 Existing and proposed spot elevations and contours lines drawn at 1 foot intervals (for land with a slope over 10 percent, the contour lines may be at 5 foot intervals) f2] 0 f2] Amount of proposed cut and fill o Stormwater Management System Study provide four (4) copies of the study with the completed Storm water Scoping Sheet attached. (See attached for Stormwater Scoping Sheet). The plan, calculations and documentation must be consistent with the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual. Complete lncomplete See Notes ~ 0 0 Scoping Sheet and attached Stormwater Management System Study Notes: 1. The right-of-way dedication shown as 30 feet on plan sheet 2 does not match the other sheets. All sheets show something different regarding the existing (or proposed right-of-way). Some sheets show existing right-of-way, while others show proposed right-of-way, and the dimensions are different on the sheets. 2. There are several private storm pipes and swales located on-site to serve for private drainage for the subdivision. Many of these pipes eross proposed property lines, and swales serve multiple lots. Swales serving more than one lot will need to be placed in a private easement, and lines crossing property lines will need to be placed in private easements. 3. The required setbacks to newly proposed property lines for the existing house to remain have not been shown on the plans. 4. TI,e square fVdco9c oft coch lo~ 3hould I:.c ;, ,J;..oted-oTlthe'l'lanso Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application: . If no 7 foot PUE exists along the frontage of South 41st Street, one may be required (by utility companies). . The amount of cut and fill is sHown to be zero. Please provide an estimate of the cut and fill. . The rooftop drainage from the site will need to meet plumbing code requirements, and will likely need to directly tie into the hard piped system. Date, Fteceived' :l.I/O~Ob Planner: AL / ~ 8 2/10/06 TENTATIVE LAND DIVISION APPLICATION PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST BUILDING Notes: Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application: 2/1 0/06 Date, Received:~bn6 Planner: AL 9 - ----- - --- Grlbev-+ G~..~ 1~/;;;:<OCJ~-CCblb fl.f~~ H~ {r",,<?k.../ ~(2 ,!4,'J:2e - f 51: d . r 5. /f;t....(.$V7 TENTATIVE LAND DIVISION/A~ L.IC~fr~W';,.c'"" PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST FIRE o Tentative Land Division Plan Complete lncomplete See Notes EJ Location, widths and names of all existing and proposed streets, alleys, dedications or other right-of- ways within or adjacent to the proposed land division rn 0 C1l GJ GJ Location of existing and required fire hydrants Notes: Additional Comments not related to the completeness of the application: If 1 I' b +~ ~(A5> 0+ ~~ Qv1lJc.<rc1...f.L< > cuea.,J; ,.~. .!-. VVO iJt1!<.r-(?Il'11' (/ ./ f r ' l' ~ 1 ~ I' -..) - I ,,' """'- /,;" fl, ;,~... <pC 1i... 2t:J ~((.JI~ IV'" /.,.,..../(,'1 -h';.e L..-U~ Sli~(',(e f;,-<. aC'CP"ir5> 'f79arf,;.. ,-- r 5 Y'OC<~.? s-L./( /;~ a-. ",/(-~..f/....... -"",Ace ~ I'~ "'ffa.v'H~7 qcCef>. ..5"'ffcrv+ a-. 'BD,e>co If.; ,"'.v-/CI.Jo<'--f /~-J, . . ;J - ~ 3 ~J-,JeavA.$.h.rl~ a'/'~~ c"'<<"'''~A.,.e. L-~,'vf.frC"'fl v'9' - / t? . LL 0/ J of 1[-e .(7V-e /1J.0~ P<<. s. tflS-T rllt6.e.. 416/04 Date: Received: z-/o/J<JX'6 Planner: AL '/ 9 ANY REQUIRED ADDITIONAL MATERIALS, APPLICATIONS OR PERMITS IT lS THE APPLICANTS RESPONSlBlLITY TO DETERMlNE lF ADDlTIONAL STANDARDS/APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE APPLICANT SHOULD CONSIDER UTILIZlNG EITHER THE DEVELOPMENT lSSUES MEETlNG OR THE PRE- APPLICATION REPORT FOR MORE DETAlLED lNFORMATlON: Applicable Not Applicable [gJ 0 0 f2] 0 f2] f2] o o f2] o f2] o f2] ~ @ f2] o f2] o 2/10/06 Proposed deed restrictions and a draft of any Homeowner's Association Agreement Additional plans and documentation for submittal of a Cluster Subdivision proposal as specified in SDC Section 16.100(3) Riparian Area Protection Report For properties located within 150 feet of the top of bank of any Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WQLW) or within 100 feet of the top of bank of any direct tributaries of WQLW A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be submitted concurrently if there are unstable soils and/or a high water table present Where the development area is within an overlay district applicable, address the additional standards of the overlay district If five or more trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling Permit as specified in SDC Article 38 A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon Division of State Lands must be submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the property Any required federal or state permit must be submitted concurrently or evidence the permit application has been submitted for review Where any grading, filling or excavating is proposed with the development, a Land and Drainage Alteration permit must be submitted with the land use application Where applicable, any Discretionary Use, Variance or Modification of Provisions as specified in SDC Article 10 or 11 DatE1 Received: z./;o/;J-aJ/. Planner: AL ~ /- II THIS APPLICATION IS: o COMPLETE FOR PROCESSING f2] INCOMPLETE AND NEEDS MISSING INFORMATION NOTED ABOVE ref. /0, 2mb Date This is not a decision on your application. Springfield Development Code Sections 3.050(3)-(6) and Oregon Revised Statutes 227.178 require the City take final action on a limited land use decision within 120 days after the application is deemed complete. The 120- day processing period for this application begins when all the missing information is submitted or when you request that the City proceed without the information. You must indicate by either signing this form or by submitting a written response to the City within seven days of the date of this form asserting your intentions regarding the provision of the missing information. If you indicate herein or in your written response that the missing information will be submitted, then you have 180 days from the date the application was submitted for Pre-Submittal Review to provide the City with the missing information. If you refuse to submit the missing information, then upon receipt of the full application packet and processing fee, the City will deem the application complete for purposes of starting the 120- day clock and begin processing the application. No new information may be submitted after the start of the 120-day period unless accompanied by a request for an extension of the 120-day processing time. Upon receipt of a request for extension, the City may extend the 120-day period for a reasonable period of time. The City may also require additional fees if the new information is submitted after the Notification to Surrounding Property Owners is sent out and a second notification is required or if the new information substantially affects the application proposal and additional review is required. I, the owner/applicant, intend to submit all missing items indicated herein to the City within the lS0-day timeline. A I YA -~O_ owner/~~ignature d-, '/ ~ --- '-" 2/1 0/06 Date Received: z-f1~ Planner: AL 12