Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNotes, Work PLANNER 4/9/2009 Annexation Basics Final Draft 1. Recommend City Council Not AODrove annexation where the Annexation Agreement does not include provisions for dealing with Plan Amendments that are requested by property owner, heirs, or assigns within three years of annexation. (Rationale: City cannot re-assure adequate/minimum public services for the property being annexed without provisions to deal with intensification of uses on annexed property without agreeing to terms prior to annexation. 2. Recommend City Council Aoorove annexation where Annexation Agreement does include provisions for dealing with Plan Amendments that are requested by property owner, heirs, or assigns within three years of annexation. The form of the provision may be of the following forms: -~ a. A generic caution ., Ision: i. Applic t will required to provide additional infrastructure, at the time evelqpment to the satisfaction of the City, to assure that key urban services required to meet the needs of any allowable , uses in the Plan Designation and Zoning District for proposed development of the site, are available at the time of development, to the maximum extent permitted by law, or b. A detailed provision of needed public infrastructure and an additional provision that should Applicant propose a Plan Amendment affecting any or all of the annexed property and the Plan Amendment proposed is aooroved/effective within three (3) years after effective date of annexation approval by City Council, City has right to re-evaluate any and all annexation conditions and ask for adjustments to the detailed provisions of needed public infrastructure to ensure the infrastructure i. Is adequate to meet the needs of any allowable uses in the proposed Plan Designation and Zoning District for development of the site and 11. Is available at the tinle of development, to the maxinlum extent permitted by law. . ~ ~ ~... ~r "C 'Q) >...1 'ij)~ l.) Q) L..: !l::Q) <D' l:: .....l:: ro.!!! 00.. . ~ ' ' "'~ No~' TIre "'ft"ttw,,= reqw"d rom! '" rooghl, proporti~re 10 pro"rt,', im",,! p~ . . T-? ~... 0.& ~C'cu.v-\;- ?<,opo\l...-"!,. 0... ?lo..... Aw-...e."A4~....(* o.)~/or ~ . ~'--~ ~~~ .~ <>1 ~ 'i: -{\:.u.. o.M.~~C~ ~~~ ~) . ~ ~\ '\e- €.0-~ c&9- <X"' \ ~ ~~~ ""-~ ~,,~ ~ CJ.N-[;J. ~ ~~ ktM~c~r.b ~ oJI-~~I~ v... &p..$ h v..c-~,^,v-R-. od<; ~ ~ ~ ~'':''''E...t''->rv.-<..Q.~ II ~ ~~"\.l\.'~ ~ ux'lao...<..< ~'('\Sl.AUL" s..~~~~* ~ "".x1.K'- ,~S .....eLo...<.>-< 61 ~ +L. ,,"o:po~~ ?L(M.<. Av.",,,,.I... ,.....ct ~o(" ~ ~ Annexation Basics Final Draft I. Recommend City Council Not Aoorove annexation where the Annexation Agreement does not include provisions for dealing with Plan Amendments that are requested by property owner, heirs, or assigns within three years of annexation. (Rationale: City cannot re-assure adequate/minimum public services for the property being annexed without provisions to deal with intensification of uses on annexed property without agreeing to terms prior to annexation. 2. Recommend City Council Aoorove annexation where Annexation A5'""...ent does include provisioQs for dealing with Plan Amendments that are requested by property owner, heirs, or assigns within three years of annexation. The form of the provision may be of the following forms: a. A generic cautionary provision: i. Applicant will be required to provide additional infrastructure, at the time of development to the satisfaction of the City. to assure that key urban services required to meet the needs of any allowable uses in the Plan Designation and Zoning District for proposed development of the site, are available at the time of development, to the maximum extent permitted by law, or b. A detailed provision of needed public infrastructure and an additional provision that should Applicant propose a Plan Amendment affecting any or all of the annexed property and the Plan Amendment proposed is aooroved!effective within three (3) years after effective date of annexation approval by City Council, City has right to re-evaluate any and all annexation conditions and ask for adjustments to the detailed provisions of needed public infrastructure to ensure the infrastructure i. Is adequate to meet the needs of any allowable uses in the proposed Plan Designation and Zoning District for development of the site and ii. Is available at the tinle of development, to the maximum extent permitted by law. Note: The infrastructure required must be roughly proportionate to property's impact. Date f~ecelved' ~//~()f Planner: AL