HomeMy WebLinkAboutComments PWS 2/26/2009
.
t'
-.
. L1MBIRD Andrew
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
ERNST Dennis
Thursday, February 26,2009 11:13 AM
L1MBIRD Andrew
MOORHEAD Chris
RE: Lot 8 Partition - Remaining House in Right-of-way
I was trying to keep it low key too by suggesting we use an Agreement. As this will be cited on the plat it will be of public
record. I'd rather keep all the language off the plat and have a separate public document they can cite. The will have to
show the encroachment on the plat and then could just reference the agreement document.
I feel the deed restriction may be a little too strong and I would expect them to be reluctant to go that way. The right of
way use agreement I feel is a little over the top as it requires a large insurance coverage or bond.
From: UMBIRD Andrew
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 10:52 AM
To: ERNST Dennis
Subject: RE: Lot 8 Partition - Remaining House in Right-of-way
I'm not sure if this will be recorded or not. Len didn't want to pursue a formal Public Way Use Agreement for the right-
of-way. We could probably record a deed restriction or something similar against Lot 8 and then.have it sunset when
the house was removed. Not sure if PeaceHealth would be receptive to this though.
Andy
From: ERNST Dennis
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 10:45 AM
To: UMBIRD Andrew
Subject: RE: Lot 8 Partition - Remaining House in Right-oF-way
Andy,
Will this letter or agreement be recorded for public record? They will have to cite this document on the plat so it would
be helpful if we recorded an agreement once we have the terms and condition defined.
Dennis
From: UMBIRD Andrew
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 10:34 AM
To: FARRINGTON Phil (5MTP)
Cc: GOODWIN Len; MOORHEAD Chris; ERNST Dennis; GRILE Bill
, Subject: Lot 8 Partition - Remaining House in Right-oF-way
Philip: Staff have determined that the residential dwelling still remaining on Lot 8 and partially encroaching within
undeveloped public right-of-way can remain for a reasonable period of time. To facilitate this arrangement and to
ensure the Lot 8 partition plat can be finalized in a timely manner, the City requests the following:
1) A letter from PeaceHealth stating the timeframe for occupancy of the dwelling, the anticipated date of removal,
and that demolition and removal of the structure and appurtenances is entirely the responsibility of
Peace Health.
1
Date Received: 2/}'6/~O?
Planner: AL /
2) A written estimate from a protessional contractor for demolition and removal of the structure, foundation, and
related improvements that encroach within or otherwise encumber the public right-of-way including, but not
limited to, decommissioning and: removal of any hazardous materials (eg. asbestos, lead-based paint),
underground utilities, septic system, fences, private well, etc.
3) An escrow deposit in the amount of 110% of the written estimate for demolition and removal of the structure
and appurtenances.
The City may be amenable to extending the timeframe for the current tenant's occupancy by mutual agreement with
Peace Health. However, a change oftenancy would not be supported because the house is not connected to City utilities'
and it would prolong the encroachment within public right-of-way. Please let me know if you have any questions about
this request. Thanks
Andy limbird
City of ?pringfield
2
Date Received:
Planner: AL
.zhd.;oo7
/ /
L1MBIRD Andrew
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
ERNST Dennis
Thursday, February 26, 2009 11 :08 AM
L1MBIRD Andrew
RE: Lot 8 Partition - Remaining House in Right-of-way
I missed a cc to you on this but I ask Andy to consider the document to be an Agreement that we can record and cite on
the plat.
From: UMBIRD Andrew
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 10:34 AM
To: FARRJNGTON Phil (SMTP)
Cc: GOODWIN Len; MOORHEAD Chris; ERNST Dennis; GRJLE Bill
, Subject: Lot 8 Partition - Remaining House in Right-of-way
Philip: Staff have determined that the residential dwelling still remaining on Lot 8 and partially encroaching within
undeveloped public right-of-way can remain for a reasonable period of time. To facilitate this arrangement and to
ensure the Lot 8 partition plat can be finalized in a timely manner, the City requests the following:
1) A letter from Peace Health stating the timeframe for occupancy of the dwelling, the anticipated date of removal,
and that demolition and removal of the structure and appurtenances is entirely the responsibility of
Peace Health.
2) A written estimate from a professional contractor for demolition and removal of the structure, foundation, and
related improvements that encroach within or otherwise encumber the public right-of-way including, but not
limited to, decommissioning and removal of any hazardous materials (eg. asbestos, lead-based paint),
underground utilities, septic system, fences, private well, etc.
3) An escrow deposit in the amount of 110% of the written estimate for demolition and removal of the structure
and appurtenances.
The City may be amenable to extending the timeframe for the current tenant's occupancy by mutual agreement with
PeaceHealth. However, a change oftenancy would not be supported because the house is not connected to City utilities
and it would prolong the encroachment within public right-of-way. Please let me know if you have any questions about
this request. Thanks
Andy Limbird
City of Springfield
1
Date> Received:
Planner: AL
;4/ )4Jq
I /
L1MBIRD Andrew
From:
Sent:
To:.
Subject:
L1MBIRD Andrew
Thursday, February 26,2009 10:52 AM
ERNST Dennis
RE: Lot 8 Partition - Remaining House in Right-of-way
I'm not sure if this will be recorded or not. Len didn't want to pursue a formal Public Way Use.Agreement for the right-
of-way. We could probably record a deed restriction or something similar against Lot 8 and then have it sunset when
the house was removed. Not sure itPeaceHealth would be receptive to this though.
Andy
From: ERNST D,ennis
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 10:45 AM
To: UMBIRD Andrew
Subject: RE: Lot 8 Partition - Remaining House in Right-of-way
Andy,
Will this letter or agreement be recorded for public record? They will have to cite this document on the plat so it would
be helpful if we recorded an agreement once we have the terms and condition defined,
Dennis
From: UMBIRD Andrew
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 10:34 AM
. To: FARRINGTON Phil (SMTP)
Cc: GOODWIN Len; MOORHEAD Chris; ERNST Dennis; GRILE Bill
Subject: Lot 8 Partition - Remaining House in Right-of-way
Philip: Staff have determined that the residential dwelling still remaining on Lot 8 and partially encroaching within
undeveloped public right-of-way can remain for a reasonable period of time. To facilitate this arrangement and to
ensure the Lot 8 partition plat can be finalized in a timely manner; the City requests the following:
1) A letter from Peace Health stating the timeframe for occupancy of the dwelling, the anticipated date of removal,
and that demolition and removal ofthe structure and appurtenances is entirely the responsibility of
PeaceHealth. .
2) A written estimate from a professional contractor for'demolition and removal of the structure, foundation, and
,related improvements that encroach within or otherwise encumber the public right-of-way including, but not
limited to, decommissioning and removal of any hazardous materials (eg. asbestos, lead-based paint),
underground utilities, septic system, fences, private well, etc.
3) An escrow deposit in the amount of 110% of the written estimate for demolition and removal of the structure
and appurtenances.
The City'may be amenable to extending the timeframe for the current tenant's occupancy by mutual agreement with
PeaceHealth. However, a change of tenancy would not be supported because the house is not connected to City utilities
and it would prolong the encroachment within public right-of-way. Please let me know ifyou,have any questions about
this request. Thanks
Andy Limbird
City of Springfield
Date f~eceived: ;./;, /;M~ 1
Planner: AL I I '
1