HomeMy WebLinkAboutComments PWS 2/23/2009
L1MBIRD Andrew
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
ERNST Dennis
Monday, February 23, 2009 2:58 PM
L1MBIRD Andrew
MOORHEAD Chris
RE: Riverbendpartition
Thanks!
I'm expecting to get a call from KPFF before long and will let them know what we found and ask them about the time
frame for the removal of the house.
Thank you both, for you help with this.
Dennis
From: UMBIRD Andrew
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 1:58 PM,
To: ERNST Dennis
Cc: MOORHEAD Chris
Subject: RE: Riverbend partition
Thanks Dennis, I agree with Chris's recent email advising that the structure will have to be removed prior to plat. Also,
it's unlikely the house has been connected to City utility services because the approved utility plans only provided for
connections to structures labeled "to remain".
Andy
From: ERNST Dennis
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 11:28 AM
To: UMBIRD Andrew
Cc: MOORHEAD Chris
Subject: Riverbend partition
Good Morning Andy,.
Chris just talked to me about the house that's half in the right of way on the un-named street in Riverbend. Didn't we
address the existing structures on the property as part of the condition of approval or an agreement document? I think'
we need to see if the house can stay on that property or not.
Maybe you have a better memory of how we handled this but I really thought the house should be gone by this time. If
not I need a reference to the document that say's if can remain and how long.
Thanks!
Dennis
1
Data Received: rr"'''f
Planner: AL