HomeMy WebLinkAboutComments PLANNER 2/26/2009
,.
I
I~
I
L1MBIRD Andrew
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
L1MBIRD Andrew
Thursday, February 26, 2009 1:48 PM
FARRINGTON Phil (SMTP)
ERNST Dennis; MOORHEAD Chris; GOODWIN Len
RE: Lot B Partition - Remaining House in Right-of-way
Philip: The escrow agreement form will be acceptable for this project.
One request I have from the City Surveyor's office is that the letter should be in a recordable "agreement" format that
can be cited on the plat document. Because the encroachment will need to be shown on the plat, a separate recorded
document can be referenced instead.of lengthy text. This will also avoid the requirement for a Deed Restriction or
Right-of-Way Use Agreement that are more cumbersome. Danny Denning may be able to provide some guidance on
this, and you can confirm the "agreement" requirements with the City Su!"'eyor's office. Please let me know if you have
any other questions. Thanks
Andy
From: Farrington, Phil [mailto:PFarrington@peacehealth.org]
Sent: Thursday, February 26,20091:16 PM
To: UMBIRD Andrew
Subject: Re: Lot B Partition - Remaining House in Right-of-way
Andy,
Thanks so much for consideration by lbe city and for your collaborative spirit One question: for lbe 'escrow deposil', could we use lbe
escrow agreement form we have previously used for other projects?
Philip
-----Original Message-----
From: LlMBIRD Andrew <alimbird@ci.springfield.oLus>
To: Farrington, Phil .
CC: Goodwin, Len; MOORHEAD Chris <cmoorhead@ci.springfield.oLus>; ERNST Dennis <demst@ci.springfield.oLus>; GRILE
Bill <bgrile@ci.springfield.or.us> '
Sent: Thu Feb 26 10:34:22 2009
Subject: Lot 8 Partition _ Remaining House in Right-of-way'
Philip: Staff have determined thatthe residential dwelling still remaining on Lot 8 and partially encroaching within undeveloped
public right-of-way can remain for a reasonable period of time. To facilitate lbis arrangemenl and to ensure the Lot 8 partition pIal
can be finalized in a timely manner, the Cityrequesls lbe following:
1) A letter from PeaceHeallb stating lhe timerrame for occupancy of the dwelling, lbe anticipated date of removal, and that
demolition and removal of the structure and appurtenances is entirely lbe responsibility of PeaceHeallb.
2) A written eslimale from a professional contractor for demolition and removal oflbe structure, foundation, and related
improvements lhat encroach within or olberwise encumber lbe public right-of-way including, but not limited to, decommissioning and
removal of any hazardous materials (eg. asbeslOS, lead-based paint), underground ulililies, seplic system, fences, private well, etc.
3) An escrow deposit in lbe amounl of 110% oflbe written estimate for demolition and removal oflhe structure and appurtenances.
1
Date Received" :;'/2' / ~O'f
Planner: AL 'I
,/
"
.,
The City may be amenable to extending the limeframe for the current tenant's occupancy by mutual agreement with PeaceHeaith.
However, a change of tenancy would not be supported because the house is not connected to City utilities and it would prolong the
encroacbmenl within public right-of-way. Please lel me know if you have any questions about this request. Thanks
Andy Limbird
City of Springfield
This message is intended. solely for the use of the individual and entity to whom it is addressed, and may
contain information thatis privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable state and
federal laws. If you are not the addressee, or are not authorized to receive for the intended addressee, you are
hereby notified that you may not use, copy, distribute, or disclose to anyone this message or the information
contained herein. If you have received this message in error, immediately advise the sender by reply email and
destroy this message.
2
Date ~eceived:~/2.tlpo1
Planner: AL