Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMiscellaneous Notice 1995-3-23 .. .. \. -e . CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT NOllCE OF DECISION - MOOIFICAll0N OF PROVISIONS DATEOFLr:.,r=K March 23, 1995 Journal Nuni:ler 95-01-18 APPU~IPROPERTY OWNER, ~ .' Bennie and Donis Ferrill 2765 Marcola Road Springfield, Or. 97477 ,NAnJRE OF 11-IE APPUCAllON The applicant is requesting a lII1odification of Provisions in order to allow the "'" ",~.JCtjon of an R V. storage building Vvtlich Vooill be 2 feet and 6 ind1es taller than the residence. Section 16.100 (1)(c) of the Springfield Development Code states that storage buildings may be only as high as the primary structure, This request is approximately an 19% inaease to the code standards. APPUCABlE CRITERIA, The Springfield Developrrent Code: -Artide 11, Variances and lII1odifications of Provisions -Artide 16, Residential Zoning Districts Eugene-Springfield Metro />rea Ce. .., al Plan DECISION Approval. OTHER USES AllTHORIZED BY T1-I1S Lr:, ,r::.. None, LOCATION OF 11-IE PRu..r::.., { The property is located at 2765 Marcola Road (Tax Map 17-D3-25, Tax Lot 105). The lot is located Vooithin the City limits. Zoning and Metro Plan designation are both Low Density Residential (LOR). BACKGROUNDI SITE INFORMATION The height of the residence is 13 feet 4 ind1es, In order to store an R V. on the property, an accessory structure of at least 15 feet 10 inches '..\oOOld be needed. The proposed R V. storage building is 19% taller than the residence, l\ "'. .- . '" . . JIYRITTEN COMMENTS Modification of Provisions applications require the notification of property ownersIoccupants within 300 feet of the propsode developrrent, allowing for a 14-day """., oci1l period prior to the staff decision. No IMitten COli. IICI II.., YJere received. Criteria of Approval for Modification of Provisions (ref Section 11.030 Modification of Provisions of the Springfield Development Code (SDC). (1) Modification of Provisions. The Director may adjust any quantitative standard of this Code involving up to a 20 percent reduction or increase provided that (a) Locational or dirrensional problems have been identified; and (b) The proposed adjl..<.~,.e,,~ is the ninim.lln'maxirrum necessary to alleviate the identified dirrensional or locational problem; and (c) The following adverse affects on neighboring properties will not occur as a result of this Modification of Provisions 1.aeates demand for on-street parl<ing; 2.inaeases noise, odor or dust; 3,aeates vision dearance area hazard for pedestrians, bicydist or rrotor driven vehides; 4,enaoaches on solar access; or 5,aeates a hazardous fire prevention or fire suppression situation, (d) Public safety will not be c:orrpronised. This decision is based on findings in response to these criteria as follows: (a) Locational or dimensional problems have been identified; The height of the proposed storage building exceeds the height of the residence by 2 feet and 6 inches, The Development Code states that storage structures on residentially zoned property ITIJSt be only as tall as the primary structure, (b) The proposed adjl..:o:', ,.. ,! is the minimum! maximum necessary to alleviate the identified dimensional or locational problem; and A storage structure needs to be a ninirrum of 15 feet 10 inches In order to a........" .,c;ate the R V. (c) The following adverse ..:ft.w:'" on neighboring properties will not occur as a result of this Modification of Provisions: 1. ~. c.a;c..> demand for on-street parking The 1-0' "1'v.>31 does not affect on-street parl<ing, 2. Increases noise, odor or dust This request is linited to building height and will not increase noise, odor or dust. 2 ~\ " '. . ,:' -.. ~ ~ '. "i 3, Creates vision clearance area hazard for pedestrians, bicyclists or motor driven vehicles; The structure INiIl be located adjacent to the rear yard of a residential lot and INiIl not have any effect on vision dearance for pedestrians, bicydists or motor driven vehides, 4. Encroaches on solar access; Section 16,100 (1)(c) states that Group A accessory structures (induding storage buildings) may be as high as the primary structure, provided that the solar access standards of this Code are met" The storage building INiIl be located over 100 feet from property to the north, and thus INiIl not encroach on the solar access of neighboring lots, 5. creates a hazardous tire prevention or tire suppression situation. Rre equipment is still accessible to the subject and surrounding properties, (d) Public safety will not be ..u.......u..Jsed. The setback affects private property only and does not irrpad public safety or public property. DECISION The requested Modification of Provisions is found to be consistent with the criteria of Section 11.030(1) of the Springfield Development Code and is hereby approved. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The application, all documents and evidence relied upon by the applicant and the applicable aiteria of approval are available for a free inspection and copies INiIl be available at a cost of $0,75 for the first page and $0,25 for each additional page at the Development Services Department, 225 Rflh Street, Springfield, O'egon, APPEAL If you INish to appeal this decision, you rrust do so INithin 10 davs of this letter, Your appeal rrust be in ' accordance INith the Springfield Development Code, Artide 15, APPEALS, QUESTIONS Please call the Development Services Department at 726-3759 if you have questions regarding this process. PREPARED BY A- Lauren Lezell Planner I