HomeMy WebLinkAboutComments Miscellaneous 1/19/2009
L1MBIRD Andrew
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Jan Petersen [h2pjan@gmail.com]
Monday, January 19, 2009 12:53 PM
L1MBIRD Andrew
DRC2009.00002
Dear Andy,
PLEASE, check with the police department You'll find the MANY records generated by inhabitants of DUPLEXES in the
neighborhood. WE DO NOT NEED MORE CRIME and "UNDESIRABLES" IN THIS NEIGHBORHOOD.
Home owners property values will be lowered by another highly visible low-end shacky rental. The ancient house on the,
property now is somewhat of an eyesore....and the new unit will no doubt be just as bad......in keeping with the
established "style" or lack thereof.' ' ,
Will the roof ridgeline line be continous"",as I was toid is required by the City to be considered a duplex? Your tentitive
partition does not show an attached roofline. Without tearing down the existing house will a duplex be possible? '
Are the sizes of the newly partitioned lots large enough to each be considered a legal lot? ....one that meets current
code? '
If you approve this Application, it WILL set a precedent Other owners and rental owners without civic pride (AND no
aesthetic sense of beauty) , will put a low end shack on their property too,
PLEASE do not approve this, (If you approve it, pl~ase require the owners to bring both units into the 21st century
with ATTRACTIVE exterior touches,...like stone work, quality siding and roofing and professional quality landscaping),
Respectfully submitted,
J, Petsersen
1
uare, r'("ct:lllled:
Planner: Al
;/;&/,;o0?
/