Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication APPLICANT 4/3/2009 ,r "I City of Springfield Development Services Department 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Development Issues Meeting (DIM) . I ~~quired Project;Infor,mation ('Applicant: complete<t{iis section) DON'AHO LOReTTA- DAVIS , . Phone:o.-'1I) 7% - '/?'l'f . Fax: (sY/) 7~' -1'138 Prospective Applicant Name: Icompany: I PO. 78~ Address: '5 PFl F I €:L. 0 I Prospective L A R Rye. Applicant's ReD.: 1 Icompany: "JRH IAddress: oR 7 R E"e-D Iphone:fS-Y/) irn -10"81 I Fax: (SW) s'/!}-65'99 lA~~)' ~elro<e ::r'RIt\VE"e,('o~ I \ L/~NO U'St:=' PLAHHING VILLA6G ZA LOOf..> . OR 7Vt!)"1 , ,~- Case NO.:~~.- &loll IAPPlication Fee: $ 52J Date: AI (2, / T>c, ITechnical Fee: ~o" - I Reviewed by: I ryL. I postaq~ Fee: $0 TOTAL FEES: 5 '2-\ PROJECT NUMBER: '~~1-~a (\DIM- ITntl~~~'~ /t':;,tJc;",-?) ..~:<<mq- 566t>r(ol.M - "Spf'J ~k\ . RevisecVi71/0B Molly Markarian ;I Date Received: APR - 3 2009 1 oU .....--',~L ,.. ~. '. , Development Issues Meeting Submittal Requirements Checklis.t J ci if Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate,fee calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development Services Department. The applicable application, technology,. and postage fees are collected at the time of complete application submittal. ~CI-I~< NO-\$. Development Issues Meeting Application Form Five (5) Questions - list specific questions the applicant would like staff to answer during the meeting. So that each question may be fully evaluated, the list is limited to five questions. SEE AT,i\CftcD 5 IS::.tJl;;IQt..1~T'lol-i AFlen\5 B Ten (10) Copies of the Proposed Plan - suggested information valuable for staff to review the proposal is listed below. It is not necessary to include all of these items on the site or plot plan. However, applicants are encouraged to address as many as possible given that the level of information that will be derived from the mee.ting is commensurate with the level of detail provided in the application. I ' ~ [if B ~ Date of preparatipn . ,-,/ ,/ . ~ . Street address and assessor's map and tax lot number B'" Dimensions (in feet) and size (either square feet or acres) of the development area o Location and size of existing and proposed utilities, including connection points o On-site drainage collection system and flow patterns, the size ahd location of drain lines and catch basins, dry wells, and natural drainageways to be retained I Area and dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, 'or reserved for .,.." common open spaces )0 'T'O la AcI2E'S AP('f?OX /5".\c. ";-MtJE' = ooo,ooo-B.- . . . S Ac ~ MU Il? -: 200u,,vl7s DIMs Related to Land DIVISions (7 :\" c;; S, F. '" 70 UNITS N/A 0 Approximate location, number and dimensions of proposed lots 0' How streets in the proposal area connect with existing streets . DIMs Related to Site Plan Review tv/,.., 0 Proposed and existing buildings: location, dimensions, size (gro~s floor area), setbacks from property lines, distance between buildings, and height Ill" 0 Area and percentage of the site proposed for buildings, structures, driveways, sidewalks, patios and other impervious surfaces :. / Date Received: N A 0 Parking and circulation plan t-l/A I'll" -------P 0 Applicants are also encouraged to include additional information on the plan as listed in the Springfield Development Code (SDC) 5.12-120, Land Divisions -.Partitions & Subdivisions - Tentative Plan Submittal Requirements or 5.17~120, Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements. " Drawn in ink on quality paper no smaller than 11" x 17" Scale appropriate to the area involved and sufficient to show detail of the plan and related data, such as 1" =30', 1" = 50' orl" =' 100' North arrow APR - 3 2009 Original Submittal Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian 3 of 3 225 Fifth Street Springfield, Oregon 97477 541- 726-3759 Phone C~.~. ."f Springfield Official Receipt 3~'i De\lelopment Services Department Public Works Department RECEIPT #: 3200900000000000214 Date: 04/0312009 2:58: 17PM Paid By DONALD A DAVIS Item Total: Check Number Authorization , Received By Batch Number Number How Received Amount Due 521.00 $521.00 Job/Jourml) Number ZON2009-000 II Description UGB Development Issues Mtg Payments: Type of Payment Check Amount Paid Ij 2472 In Person Payment Total: $521.00 $521.00 Date Received: APR - 3 2009 Original Submittal cRcccintl Page I of 1 4/3/2009 LII i OF SPRINGFIELD VICINITY MAP ZON2009-00011 1081 Linda Lane & 36077 Jasper Road SIIE Map 18-02-04-00 Tax Lot 1502, 2500 North + ..J ~ / ~~ Date Received: APR - 3 2009 Original Submittal REQUEST FOR DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING . INTRODUCTION Royal Family Investments, LLC (Don and Loretta Davis and Jack Louis) has purchased a 36-acre site to the east of a IO-acre parcel owned by the Davises. These 46 acres are the proposed development site. A tax lot map is attached (labeled as Map A), ,showing tax lot 1502 and tax lot 2500 of Lane County Tax Assessor's map 180204, A larger scale composite map is attached as Map A-J, This development site is within the currently established urban growth boundary (UGB). The owners desire to build a mixed-use employment development. This employment development would have a mix of allowed uses under the City's Mixed-Use Employment Dis!Tict (Springfield Code 3:2-610- Business and'Professional Offices; Educational! School Facilities; Manufacturing! Assembly/ Warehousing, including some eating! restaurant establishments; and multi- family dwelling/ apartment buildings, including possibly some condominiums. The first step in the development process is the annexation of this development site. The MetroPlan diagrilm and City zoning map both show the subject.site's land use designation as Low-Density Residential. (Refer to MetroPlan diagram - attached Map B and zoning map - attached Map C.) The City staff's Jasper-Natron concept plan is proposing this development site's southern 4/5ths have a Campus Industrial land use designation, leaving the northern 9 or 10 acres of tax lot 1502 as Low-Density Residential. As explained in the City's draft staff report, this proposed MetroPlan diagram as moving the City's needed industrial land out of identified wetland areas and relocating them adjacent to the railroad and west of the Bob Straub Parkway, (Refer to Jasper-Natron Concept Plan map D.) This proposed MetroPlan change and land use designation to Campus Industrial is agreeable to the owners subject to the following understanding. That is, the owners may implement this MetroPlan Campus Industrial designation using the City's Mixed-Use Employment zoning district. (Correct?) This requested meeting is to focus on the annexation of this development site. In addition to having City staff (routine attendees of Planning, Public Works/ Stormwater and Wastewater staff) attend our Development Issues Meeting. we would also request the City invite the following agencies: . Springfield Fire Department . Springfield Utility Board (SUB) water representative . Emerald People's Utility District (EPUD) or SUB electrical district distribution representatives . NW Natural'Gas representative . Springfield School District representative Date Received: . Willamalane Park District representative APR - 3 2009 Original Submittal , Also attached are Map E, which is an aerial photo of the site, and Map F, which shows a preliminary conceptual street layout and land use map for the Roya] Family Investments, LLC mixed-use development. Accompanying map F are some images of the type of development envisioned. (2 to 4 story buildings, dense urban with building up close to street) QUESTIONS AND ISSUES 1. Mixed-use zoning versus nodal overlay zone: The City's Deve]opment Code appears to provide two avenues for creating an employment mixed-use development. . Option #1: In accordance with the MetroPlan diagram designation of Campus Industrial, the proposed mixed-use development may be implemented by the use of the City's Mixed-Use Employment (MUE) zoning. . Option #2: In accordance with the MetroPlan land use diagram of Campus Industrial, the proposed mixed-use development may be implemented by the way of the City's Nodal Development Zoning Overlay district. Does City Plahning staff have a preference as to which option is pursued? If Option #2 does not exist, the owner/ design team is fine with the MUE zoning. Clarification of these two options would be helpful. 2. Urban service routing: Please explain and show us on the urban service location and routing mapping ,how and where the various urban services will be routed to the site, covering the , following: . Wastewater/ sanitary sewers . Street connectivity with 57th Street South . Storm water . Water mains . Electrical distribution and substations . Natural gas What urban services and utilities are located in the Parkway? At the southwest comer ofthe development site, it is some 900 feet to ],000 feet east to the Parkway. Is the City acquiring any collection or lateral utility easements to facilitate the developers' ability to extend service to the properties not immediately adjacent to the Parkway or the wastewater trunk line? ,Date Received: APR - 3 2009 Original Submittal 3. Financel Cost: The owner cannot afford to build! finance the extension of all the needed urban services to their 40-acre development site, How can the City help? . City funding resources available? . Willingness to set up meetings to talk with all the abuitingl surrounding property owners along the planned route of key urban facilities about forming a local improvement district (LID)? . Willingness to set up an LID and! or reimbursement district? . Is a separate LID/ reimbursement district for each individual City service? Does the City coordinate these other urban services? 4. Design: It is our understanding the City and Springfield Utility Board have been doing the , preliminary design and cost analysis for these urban services.' . What is the status of this design process for the key urban services and facilities? . Does the City yet know or have an estimate of how much each urban service/ facility will cost? . What is the construction timetable of the wastewater trunk line? . What will the City require of the owner (Royal Family Investments, LLC) in tenus of what will be in the annexation agreement? 5. 'Annexation and ,Scheduling: It is our understanding the Jasper-Natron MetroPlan Amendment has been delayed until around December of 2010, until the City's land use inventory and needs analysis has been completed. . Will this delay of the amendment also delay the annexation? o Does this delay/ prevent the City completing the annexation agreement? o Could the owner execute the agreement but simply delay annexation until the Jasper-Natron MetroPlan amendments are adopted? . Does the City have a: standard Jasper-NalTon annexation agreement format? ! Date Received: APR - 3 2009 Original Submittal . Does staff have an estimate of how long it will take to have an initial, but fairly complete, annexation agreement, with estimated cost figures, including what the City wants from the owner? Your preliminary thoughts and comments would be helpful, including any,other advice that would assist the mixed-use development design team in speeding along the annexation and help the design team in the development of this mixed-use development would be appreciated. Date Received: APR - 3 2009 Original Submittal MAP A FOR ASS::SSMEI~T /,,/\ D T ^\t,TIO/\ :::r,LY SECTION 4 T.18S. R.2.W. W.M. LANE COUNlY SCAlE ," _ 400' SEElUrP1702J3 18 02 04 ~. ~......~""'".." .. I~ I NAO 83/91 ~ , J3 34 I ',""-""",,.j/ , 8 ""... ' 'h_ ~ ,,,,,,. */SE!:WN'17023JJJ l~q"K::::-~:; :~;'.:n."';;-; ': ~ ... ~,:.;G=" J'i I L.: -,,~ 'J / SEE "A~ lOa r~"" t!;f':/ ~ '--~'" '" ~" ./1 ,,""_~., ',,'. -~..,'-"'-."-'..::::.." """""C><-'C:.::..J , " . _:' , """"~1 .. .~":'_":--~ '';''--''--,.......- ""-,,,. "--', , r' ~,'.'-,-, -- "M ..,....--~, ., I '0' ,~...,y. . "" .~ ,..,,'" 101 '! L r--:-.... '\. f"'U' ; ...., i.;I, ! SE .,1 ':;.<P' fM-ttp\, !L ~. 0'9-.J'j , _ ~~ I .... -"'"",:, I lit! "\ "": ~,~ :t' #':~_~ :1 . -"'--,>:,. -- -l'''':7-"~'--I;''';'':'-I'-' '~:' .""~11 i fe' o-2~1' ' j,..- J .. ~'". I , -""~; _.! 0""'. i ~_. ...; ~~_ "... ,-~' "-~ 'f 1;1.!~.:,... ."~'~_, _I; Jj,,~;-:. il~T I~. ~ 4)"." ' Jr'''''-!.. " ~\,I ",' I .dO '~~'''''''-'O:- I "J 1 c.-;;;" (l'j~' ....~ i~t-:'"1:i:;_:.. e~:':J t~:.. , .'!...; I Utt. ,." $00, I,. ':l::.&..~ ~EO~"~:' uj I ~S~,.:- ZU30tes ~t':;'~9 ~~ ... ""4~._:tI_ ~ ..."""'..................,..._..,.."'..~.... ~ .,"~ * -I' ...-. ,. ~- ., ;. "f<l.'~ l ...."". "\"""'-""t;l'~ '\. ~ jrj.. c..., r ').:c_ ~7 ~ "I '" 3" I ~..t"" J"" '. ...~.!'" ~~., - ,I.' ~ '---~~'''"1<l''=''"'''.' .. Gh- J .._-..... <)~'" ...".....J OL< ,... I i J;~-<j gi ~: =;;'><<>''\.' .',,: -:. :p._~ ...v..;,-.".Ju..J 1:~~":':"~~~:-1., ':::..~- ~~.. 'j~:--~~:'~( ~~i,;. :...". ".- 1& ~:'~ 42 ~"',..., .~",9 r2i3 I OLO~' , ',vi'> ",P'_ n _", I ..."" .. "~~,, , " .. 'J. '- r -, "" . . """ ... I ' ~.<,' -;.;.} 1- ..._, j ~:rr3-3;;: \1:ul0 lIC.i~. .. _ ~.-- - ~..:.::.J II _occs \-...1' , -~'I""--......, 1 " #" -=..-- i It.i,,ooJ . :~ ':.-; t; I /1. .// \,: "-.0 "" t ,~~ ,...' /' "......'. ...., . ,/"'- ;r-. '.>,*'" I . ,..~. /<~ ... . '\ I _/, ." /... , '...,INO' j"td"~/ ~ r.. ~.".~ .. ,/ ;olo' /' . ..."." .." , \ ' /.0/ Q ''''-OJ I.. ' /i"'''' // 1,._.- ..... I SEC--:;::: r.... ( I O'....'....L',,' / ... - AA 1_ nt..:....~~;... t' j ...,~._-_..t!'t."":.-..-=:.~"7-7..--."ln El.1..c.. / I ~ r"'~"wc.r... '-/ // QU.....'l ,..._/ J ..! . P 601_ ....-:: ,'/ ~_' ""n ]1' OlC-"".U//.,......"/ /' _.............._...~....., ;t '-:-1j:..r_ ./ ..........~"::...._ /".' // /. ..-::* ~,tr... .n t.. ..... .4'::: .~-',t>l.t...,o? ' I " /-/'" .../,/ ,/ '. <t,.- / .... . I ,,- ...'J:',/:/" "'....""" i ./ /..../ <..... 019,-()i -,,~ no) ,~, IN, \503 ZllOS \!IOf .... ,~ Zl101 \~ Z9O& ISO' .... ,~ 21110 1>00 21111 :000 21112 2001 2II1l "00 21110 lXl) :211" .uoo m. nu n" .... I I a " o . " o ;J''j-(k) . , . c~'g-15 , ~! r , d- '-::l~~"'r,...- ,I, 'I" 18 02 04 Date Received' APR - 3 2009 Original Submittal m9- 37 .15 I I I I I ,/ /1 /1 -""'.:::!......... -- - :f,' -~ . 5.04~C ".... -- -~- 500 155~ ~ 01-13! Lon I 15.50 :J: ..:"n.......~',..'H.'..{ lOT 9 22.12 PeL' :IJ. i: 1404 ?D7M:. " v o "oc,oroS A- o'~~......~O( , 4 MAP I U I;:'-~ " IU,"C. SE COR. S.D. GAGER ~L':: .',\..I NE COR. 51~;') m9-1V I I I I I II "~d , I ~; \':,02' ___. \C "'.'''~.c.s SEE .... '0020333 10J 1SS,''''C 200 8O.31AJ; :1 . '\ .1 . , 'I ','___'.n--'____'nn_____'__'n'_n~ I 019-15 I I I ,~,..... S.M2&4 S.207&ot .-" SE COR J SMITH ~._ __ -"-'.1. _......~...__ --;.:.QLP~.~ , 900 . 3194...0 , , , , , , , - .' -, ~ ~ 001-03 ." LOT 4 10.30 Date Received' ; ~._-~,.....,..'==.T<A,=,~- , " ( APR - 3 2009 ~ ~ ~ I I I [ ,[ ; . I' ell LOT 3 21.40 .~ lL015 ~ 3.38 T I' '"' I 1 1 ":'i-"'" I"" ';''lW'~. ----70<,,--4. 1200 1201 . 1142AC 13,OIIAC MAP 5 '~".; Urban Growth Boundary Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan Plan Diagram (The purpose of the Plan Diagram and the descriptions of the land uses and symbols shown are contained in Otapter II-E) . Railroads EJ low Density Reliidentilll 0 Ught Medium Indudrilll . '".,1 " m Medium Density Residential ~ Campus Industrial . . [] . High Density Residential ~.' : University Research ~.. . Commercial U Government and Education ~ 1m Major Retail Centers . Parks and Open Space ~ . He~vy Industrial . Natural Resource C ~ Special Heavy Industrial B Sand and Gravel ( A ~'- , , , ~ Agriculture ./ ",......,,' General Plan Boundary ./"v'-' /'V Forest land Rural Relsidllntial Rivers and Ponds Rural Commercial ~ Urban Reserve Areas ~ Mixed Use ArellS Rural tndulitrial Airport Reserve January 1998 ~ - ~ , " ,.-......... (+ -. ). tf" + ~ APR - 3 2009 Origi~'~lttal_ ~ o 7000 It The infonnation on this map was derived from digital databases on Lane Council of Government's Regional Geographic Infonnation System. Care Was taken in the creation of this map. but it is provided" as is" . LCOG cannot accept any responsibility for errors. I omissions, or positional accuracy in the digital data or the underlying records. Current plan designation, zoning, etc., for specific parcels should be confirmed with the appropriate agency. There are no warranties, express or implied, ac....,"'t'~')ing this product. How- ever, notification of any errors will be appreciated. Attachment 1 -~ .. ,., .; c::J .usper-Natron SlLdyArea CJ l..k1a1 Gl'"ow1h Boonda-y ~c..rr"'d:::::;.';'.;::,.,.tions . Hgh Density ".I- ,I. ,Ii, . Ugtt tJedl.m Industrial Low Density Residential Medilm Density Resideriial Special HeaW IrxlJstrial ~ - Current Metro Plan Designations <l) 600 0 600 1200 Feel ._,-..-.1 Date Received: APR - 3 2009 Original Submittal Jasper-Natron Metro Plan Amendments Staff Report May 20, 2008 MAPS-I! j -3"8- I , -- I ~_Il I~ - -011-/1;1- MAP C ...... . .' , ,. ,. ,. ,. ,. . . .' , .' .' .' ~ . I . ~ . . .' .' , --."<- ,. ,. ,. ,. ,. ,. ,. ,. ,. ,~Receivec:t I Springfield Zoning Sule Ilncb .1000 leet APR - 3 2009 ---, Original Submittal . """' "'" D He NrlghhorhodCollllllmll1 D IUW 100111 hUy IIludUst ell, U.its . cc Co.mull, CUllud,1 ~ uwcc IIb,d USt uu & cc UrbnCroll11l Bondur . 0" )liIjorhllllColllllfrdll . PlO hbliclnd& OpnSplCf ZooiogCRltul10 luu1r1M5 . GO CrunlOlfiu D 101 10. Du.tUr Itsldnlial Cily L1l1its carlullo hbrlll17 UQS D '0' llghtlbdilllildlllrlal D 00. MedlUII Dmlly ItlidntJd Th;"It_lldIHLlob...pllllttllolt4tM,t..,lJ utMl,. 114''-~IHU..4.slplll",ltll,.clllr ~ CI Clllpas Illdutrbl ~ '01 HlgllDtIIllrhsJdutiaJ ..lltli,pl....(..lttllbClIJ~J,rlaf1I.J, o...r..,...ts.,.kll.'....I..O',........ . HI Brn., Illdulrid D ao QunT & WID! OpmUOll1 . . $" 5pedill HtnrlodlllriaJ . Waler (bprrsnlaUn depictioll 011,1 ..' ~- MAP D Attachment 2 -~ ,1 - f ,,, o CJ Jasper-Natron Stl.dy Area CJ Lkbal G-ONth Boundary Proposed Plan r. ." . <; . ~ Community /. . I. CampU5 IndJstrial Low Density Residential . Medum Density Residentia .', Mixed Use Canmercial I ~ Proposed Metro Plan Designations (l) 600 0 600 1200 Feet - Date Received' APR - 3 2009 Jasper-Natron Metro Plan Amendments Staff Report May 20, 2008 Original SUbmittf! '" G:I I - \~ " .. I ..,I. . ~\~'~.'\~ ~""i" . . . I I I .. II 'I . .. I I . .1 , '. . I . .... I I ) ~. -,:; ~ ..,. ~. .ro.: ), " .