HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance 6239 03/16/2009
.'
ORDINANCE NO. 6239
AN ORDINANCE WITHDRAWING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY KNOWN AS JACKSON,
LOCATED IN THE HAYDEN BRIDGE ROAD AREA OF NORTH SPRINGFIELD, WEST OF 19th
STREET AND INCLUDING PROPERTIES OWNED BY DANIEL AND SHANNON JACKSON.
THE WITHDRAWAL INVOLVES APPROXIMATELY 9 ACRES IDENTIFIED AS A PORTION OF
TAX LOT 2000, T17S R03W S24 MAP31 AND ALSO KNOWN AS 2778 N 19th STREET;
HERETOFORE ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD FROM THE RAINBOW WATER
DISTRICT.
WHEREAS, certain real property described below was annexed to the City of
Springfield by order of Lane County Local Government Boundary Commission under
Boundary Commission Number File EC SP 0,8-16, effective 1/25/08, as recommended in
City Planning File No. LRP2007-00009 and supported by City Council Resolution No. 07- 57
(and further described in Exhibit A & B), and
WHEREAS, the property to be withdrawn IS located within the boundaries of the
Rainbow Water District, and
WHEREAS, the City of Springfield Common Council held a public hearing and first
reading in the Springfield City Council Chambers on March 2, 2009, and a second reading
and adoption on March 16, 2009, in accordance with ORS 222.524, for the purpose of
hearing any objections to the withdrawal of the property from the public service district
mentioned and there having been no objections raised.
NOW THEREFORE THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1: The Common Council of the City of Springfield does hereby determine
that the real property described should be in the best interest of the City of Springfield
withdrawn from the Rainbow Water District in Lane County, Oregon, insofar as the property
is located therein.
Section 2: The Common Council of the City of Springfield does hereby determine
that the following described real property within the boundaries of the Rainbow Water
District is and shall be withdrawn from the Rainbow WClter District in Lane County, Oregon,
said property being described as follows: Township 17South, Range 03West, Section 24,
Map 31, that portion of Tax Lot 2000 within the Urban Growth Boundary of Springfield, as
more particularly described in Exhibit B of this ordinance, Boundary Commission File Number
EC SP 08- 16.
ADOPTED by the Common Council of the City of Springfield this 16h day of March
2009, by a vote of 6 for and ~ against.
Council Pre~ident
APPROVED by the~"" of the l.;rt/J;:;~ March 2009.
~a~~ Council President
ATTEST: ~
R[V~EWED lIt APprwvr6Y R rder
Af:; TO FORM
~~<"-l'\.' ~ \. ~,~.(
DATE:~I '2 \,.11 c~_
OFFICE OF CITY ATTORNEY
EXHIBIT A
-
Fcbnmry 12,2007
. Branch No, 06--203
LEGAL DESCR:IPTION
FOR
.AmiEnTIONFURFOSES
LANDS OF:QANIEL L. AND ~ONL JACKSON
(pORTION OF TAX MAP 17-03-24-31. TAX LOT 2000)
"
SITUATED in 1.IDincorporated area inLane C~~ty. State of Oregon in the Southwest 1/4 of Section
24, Township 17 South" Range 3 West of the Willamette Mer:icUan and descnoed as follow,s:
BEING a portion of the lands that ~e conveyed to Daniel L, and Shannon Batty in that certain
SpecialWananty Deed that was recorded 1:fay 16, 1990 in Ree11632R at Reception l{iImber
9022540 in the Officiai Records of Lane County, State of Oregon, said portion being more
particularly described as follows:
. r
. .
Co~encing at a. p?int.17.42 ~ n~rth o~ a point where tIle ~ast line ofthe.'Yilliam C. Spencer
Donation Land Claim Numb~, Notification Number 3265, Intersects the line between Section
.24 and Section 25, Township 17 South, ~ge 3 West-ofthe W~etteMerldian; thence North 89" .
42' 331' West 393.00 feet and North'OO 06' 16" West 22$.00 feet to the southwest comer of said
, lands that were conveyed in the aboVe deed, which point lies on the existing city limits line oftlie
City of Springfield and is the TRUE :POINTQFBEGINNING of the lands beingdescnbed'herein;
THENCE leaving said TRUE :POINT OF :BEG~G and along said city limits line and west
line of said landS that were conveyed in said deed, NORlH 00. 06' 16" WEST 90.0 FEET. more or
less, to an angle point 1n the Urban GrowthBoun~ of the City of Springfield; TllENCE,l~aving
said city limits line and said west line of said lands that were conveyed in said deed. NOR1H 63.
35' EAST 435 FEET, mOI~ or less, along said Urban Growth Boundary to an angle point in said
boundaIythat lies on the east line of said lands that were conveyed m said deed; THENCE,leaving
said Urban Growth Boundary and along said east line of said lands that were conveyed in said deed,
SOUTH 00. 06' 2411 EAST 11 00 FEaT, more or less, to the southeast comer of said lands that were
convCyed in the'said deed; AND THENCE, along the south line of said lands that were conveyed
in the said deed NORUl 89. 42'33" WEST 393.00 FEET RETURNINGto.the TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING arid CONTAINING 9.0 A~S, ~ore or less. .
Date Received
~EC "3 200~
Planner: BJ
. w...{, ""'\Q ( Z I W 7
REGISTERED
PROFESSIONAL
SURVEYOR
ORE
JULY 20. 1993
REXA. BETZ
/-tc. t:?'~ 1""'/"fr/07
ATTACHMENT 1 - 2
'~
'iii
t::~
R~"
tI~r!I"
~~i~i
18: ~I;"
l~!8~~
i! ~~II&l
i1~~~
~tJlIi
~~
I=ai..
~
:a:
~
~{
I
III
. & I
"I n
. : I
EXHIBITS
....-...
... ... II
... - .~
uP....
I
" I
I
. . I
/:
... wow I
, I
___________J
Date Received
DEe 0 :-I 20n~
ATTACHMENT 1 - 3
Planner: BJ
I
..
.3
~
"
I
I
!'lC
I
i
!
..J anuary 15, 2008
LANE COUNTY LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION
99 East Broadway
Suite 400
Eugene, OR 97401-311]
(54]) 682-4425
FAX (541) 682-2635
SUBJECT:
Boundary Commission Members; Lane County Commissioners; Lane County
Land Management Division; Lane County Environmental Health Division; City of
Springfield; Willainalane Park and Recreation District; Daniel and Shannon
Jackson; and Jeanette Applauso at Branch Erigineering
Paula L Taylor, Executive OffiGb d-~
EC SP 08 - 16 (Expedited Procedure) . ~~'tJcL
ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY T9 THE CITY OFEUG (Jac~son)
TO:
FROM:
Enclosed is a copy of the staff analy~is for this proposal, It is sent to you as required by ORS
199.466. 'Please read the analysis carefully. The proposal is recommended for approval without
a public hearing or further staff stUfy, '
There are two alternatives:
1. If you agree with this recommendation, you need do nothing.
2. If you feel that a public hearing is needed, 'you must request, in writing by January
25,2008, that a hearing should be set. The request must be in the commission's
office by 5:00 p.m., January 251h. You must use the form that is provided at the
end of the staff aqalysis to request a hearing. For units of government, the form
should be signed by the chairman/mayor. or other authorized person. If you or
your unit of government requests a public hearing, the boundary commission asks
that you attend the requested public hearing. If a hearing is requested, it will be
set for the next available boundary commission public hearing.
IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. REGARDING THE PROPOSAL OR PROCEDURE,
PLEASE CONTACT OUR OFFICE (541-682-4425).
Attachments
pI: LCBC: L"\BC\EXPlMEMOI2008\ECSP0816 MEM.DOC
last Saved: January. J 5, 2008
ATTACHMENT 1 - 4
Date Received
MAR 7 2008
Planner: BJ
EXPEDITED PROCEDURE - STAFF ANALYSIS
LANE COUNTY LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION
Annexation of Territory to the City of Springfield (Jackson)
1. BC File EC SP 08 - 16
Initiated by Resolution No. 07-57 by the City of Springfield with property owner consents
Action under ORS 199.466 and 199.490(2)(a)(A) of the boundary commission law
Deemed vaiid December 31, 2001
Public hearing requests by January 25, 2008
Description
The annexation area includes one tax lot located in north Springfield, north of Yolanda
. Avenue, west of 19th Street, east of Vera Street .
Property owners: Daniel and Shannon Jackson (2778 19dJ Street. Springfield)
Tax lot: part of 2000, T17S R03W S24 Map 31
Acres: :t 9.00
Estimate of existing population: 2 (one single-family residence)
Existing land use: ResideJtjial, vacant, orchard
Existing zoning in Lane County: LDRlUF, low-density residential with urbanizing fringe
overlay .
Applicable comprehensive plan: Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan
(acknowledged August 1982 and has been subsequently amended)
Existing public services to tbe property: Police (Oregon State Police, Lane County
Sheriff), schools (Springfield School District 19), roads (City of Springfield, Lane
County), water (well), wastewater (onsite individual wastewater system)..
electricity (SUB)
Reason for Annexation
The property owners requested annexation in order to prepare the annexation area for
residential development. The Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan
requires properties to annex in order to receive urban services.
This annexation proposal was filed in accordance with ORS 199.490(2)(a)(A), initiated by the'
city council with consents from owners, and ORS 199.466 (expedited procedure). Before
initiating the annexation, the City of Springfield received written consents from the owners
consenting to the annexation. No other properties are included in the annexation request. The
statutory requirement for an annexation to be initiated bya city council after receiving written
consents frorp owners is met.
ORS 199.466 authorizes approval of annexations without a public hearing or adoption of a [mal
order if requested by the principal petitioner, Under the expedited procedure, the boundary .,
commis~i?n ex~.cutive officer .must prepare an analysis of the proposal within_ ReCeived
ATTACHMENT 1 - 5
MAR . 7 2008
Planner: BJ
LCLGBC Staff Analysis (ECSPOS-16)-January 15,2008
Page 1 of 10
receipt. If, after 25 days from the filing date (in this case, January 25th), no written objections are .
received from direct recipients of this staff analysis, the request is approved. However, if any
direct recipient of this staff analysis does object, the proposal is scheduled for the next regular
boundary commission public bearing. Direct recipients are the individuals eligible to request a
public hearing and are listed below under the first boundary commission standard,
. The proposed annexation area includes a portion of one tax lot that is developed with one single-
family residence (refer to Maps No. land 2). The owners of the property requested aimexation
in order to prepare the annexation area for low-density residential development.
The annexation area is not contiguous to the main body of the City of Springfield, but abuts other
noncontiguous portions of the city. It is located within the acknowledged urban growth boundary
(UGB), which lies along the northern boundary of the amiexation area. The portion of this
property located outside the UGB is not being annexed and will not be provided urban services.
The existing zoning of the annexation area is LDRlUF, low-density residential with urbanizing
fringe overlay, in Lane County. It is designated low-density residential in the Eugene-Springfield
Metropolitan Area General Plan (Me1!o Plan).' Upon the effective date of the annexation, the
annexation area will be automatically zoned LDRconsistent with the low-density residential plan
designation.
~.
, Resolution No. 07-57, unanimously approved by the Springfield city council o~ November 23,
2007, initiated the annexation. The city council's support for the annexation was based on
evidence that the annexation area could be provided with key urban services. As requested by
the council, the annexation request was forwarded to the boundary commission, The city council
reviewed the Annexation Agreement between the city and the property owners outlining the
agreements between the two parties for. the provision of urban services and financing
responsibilities before supporting the annexation, The Annexation Agreement has been fully'
executed and is part of the boundary commission's record for this application. .
Following is a brief analysis of each of the boundary commission standards,
Provide an impartial forum for resolution of local jurisdictional questions, Consider the
effec~s of the boundary change on other units of governments. ORS 199.410(1)(b) ,and
199.41 0(3) (c)
This annexation request was filed in accordance with provisions in ORS 199 and was detennined
to be a valid filing in' accordance with OAR 191-006 (adopted administrative rule on boundary
commission filing requirements). The petitioners requested the proposal be processed using the
expedited procedure.
This staff analysis was sent to the following direct recipients: Lane boundary commission
members, Lane County commissioners, Lane County Land Management Pivision, Lane County
Environmental Health Division, City of Springfield, Willamalane Park and Recreation District
. - . )
" Daniel and Shannon Jackson, and Jeannette Applauso at Branch Engineerinb · d
. ' '.' ,ate Receive
LCLGBC Staff Analysis (EC SP 08 - ]6) - January 15, 2008
Page 2 of 1 0
MAR
7 2008
ATTACHMENT 1 - 6
Planner: BJ
Upon the annexation effective date. the area will be ~nexed automatically to the Lane County
Metropolitan Water Service District and the Willamalane Park and Recreation District [ORS
199,5IO(2)(c)] because the dty is a part of . both' these spe~ial districts. The Lane County
Metropolitan Wastewater Service District was formed to provide the financing for the regional
wastewater treatment plant serving wastewater users within the cities of Euge~e and Springfield
and other users within the urbanizable area. The park district provides park and recreation
services and facilities to Springfield residents, .
This request is consistent with this boundary commission'standard.
Consider the order,ly determination and adjustment of local government boundaries to best
meet the needs of Lane County and Oregon. Consider alternative solutions where
intergovernmental options are identified and make decisions based on the most effective long-
range option among identified alternatives. ORS ]99.4]0(1)~ 199.410(2), and 199.410(3)(a)
and (e)
The annexation .area is located within the acknowledged UGB of the Metro Plan and is not
contiguous to the main body of the City of Springfield. . Territory within the UG:S ultimately will
be within the City of Springfield. ,Annexation of this property fulfills the policies adopted in the
Metro Plan of annexing out to th~ban growth boundary. .
Noncontiguous annexations are allowed by sta~e annexation law and provided for in the Metro
Plan if certain criteria are met. The Metro Plan policy for noncontiguous annexation (P~licy #12,
page ll-C-5) requires that noncontiguous annex'ations meet the following criteria:
a, The area to be annexed will be provided urban service(s), which is (are) desired
immediately by the residents/property owners.
b. The area to be an,nexed can be serviced (with a minimum level of services, as
directed in the Metro Plan) in a timely and cost-efficient manner and is a logical
extension of the city's service delivery system.
c. The annexation proposal'is accompanied by 'suppoq within the area-proposed for
annexation from the owners of at least half the land area in the affected territory.
The incremental process of annexation' causes short-term boundaries to be established. The
acknowledged comprehensive plan in this area identifies the ~ity of Springfield as the unit of
. government, which will provide urban services to this urbanizable area within the UGB. In the
long term, territory within this geographic area will be annexed to Springfield.
This annexation is consistent with boundary conunission administrative. rule implementing
policies (I), (2), (5), and (7), which recognize annexation to an' existing. city as the preferred
method of-servicing urbanizable land. '
:\
.L....~ i .~.
~ ft""'::" ii it ~
ATTACHMENT 1 - 7
Date Recenfed
MAR 1 2008
Planner~ R.I
LCLGBC Staff Analysis (EC SP08-16)- January 15,2008
Page 3 of 10
(1) This policy recognizes cities as the logical providers of .urban levels of service
within urban growth boundaries when consistent with the comprehensive plan.
(2) This policy expresses the commission's preference for providing urban services
through annexation to a city in order to provide urban serv~ces to urbanizable
lands.
(5) This policy encourages provision of urban levels of service within urban growth
boundaries.
(7) This policy expresses the commission's preference for annexation to an existing
city over all other alternatives as a means of.extending services to urbanizable
lands:
hnplementing policy (3) recognizes that in order to meet the long-tenn objectives of annexing
out to an acknowledged UGB, short-term boundaries are created, which are logical within the
context of the future service boundary.
This proposal to annex territory to the City of Springfield JS consistent with boundary
commission policies and this stan9ard.
~' ,
Make boundary commission determinations, which are consistent with acknowledged local
comprehensive plans. Assure an adequate quality and quantity of public services required in
the comprehensive plan to meet existing and futur.e growth. For major boundary changes,
there must be assurance that the proposed' unit of government is finanCially. viable. ORS
199.410(1)(d), 199.410(3)(~) and (d)
The annexation area is within the Metro Plan UGB. The Metro Plan was ackno~ledged by the
Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCD C) in August 1982 and has been
subsequently amended. The Metro Plan recognizes annexation as the highest priority for
extending the minimum range of urban services to urbanizable areas (policies #8 and #10, page
TI-C-4) and recognizes that ultimately, all territory within the UGB will be annexed to an existing
city (policy #16, page D-C-5).,
The annexation area is designated as low-density residential in the Metro Plan. Upon the
effective date of the annexation, the annexation area willbe automatically rezoned to LDR in the
city.
The annexation area will take advantage of urban service delivery systems that are already in
place to serve this area. The following services are either available or can be extended to the
annexation area.
Water - Springfield Uti.lity B.oard (SUB) will provide water service to the annexation are~
following annexation, An existing 6-inch line is located at the east end of Vera Street and is
' .
a,vailable to serve th~ annexation area
Date Rooeived
LCLGBC Staff AI!~ysis CECSP08-16)-January 15,2008
Page 4 of 10
A'iIAi{ J iDtid
.,-'J!
" :' ..~ :~. '. ~_.......::II
ATTACHMENT 1 - 8
PI::tnnAr: BJ
Electricity - SUB indicates that it provides electric service in this general area and can provide
service to new development within the annexation area. Upon annexation and development,
underground power will be extended to the annexation area from an existing line near the
intersection of Yolanda Street and 19th Street. .
Police services - The Springfield police department can provide police protection to the area
after annexation without jeopardizing service in other parts of the city. Springfield police already
provide service to nearby properties within the city, '
Fire and emer2ency services - The annexation area is currently without structural fire protectiori.
. .
Annexation to the city will provide these services to the developing area. The annexation area is
located within the four minute response time area of the Springfield Fire and Life Safety Fire
Stations 3, 4, and 5. Development of the annexation area will be subject to all applicable
Springfield 'development code and fire code requirements to provide adeq1;latefire and life safety
access and water supply~
Emergency medical transport (~bulance) services' are provided ona regional basis by
Springfield, Springfield, and Lane Rural Fire/Rescue to central Lane County. The annexation
area will continue to receive this service consistent with the adopted ambulance service area
(ASA) plan. Mutual aid agreemiJjts have been adopted by the three regional ASA providers to
provide backup coverage for each other's jurisdictions. .'
Parks and recreation -After annexation, tlJe annexation area will be within the Willamalane Park
and Recreation District boun'dary. City resideI;lts receive, park and recreation services from the
district. The district operates two aquatic centers, a community center, an adult activity center,
and 31 parks containing a variety of outdoor recreationaJ amenities. The closest park to the site
is Royal Delle, a 2.76-acre neighborhood park at 401 Blackstone' Street. Other nearby
recreational opportunities include harvest Landing and page Park.
Schools - Springfield School District 19 serves this area. Existing schools-:- Yolanda
elementary, Briggs middle, and Springfield high-serve this neighborhood anci can accommodate
students resulting from new development occurring within the annexation area.
Wastewater - Springfiel~ staff indicates a public wastewater system is currently under
construction and 'includes a new lift station located in the annexation area. Future site
development will be served from ~is lift station upon acceptance by the city council (expected
by May 2008). As a part of the system construction, a IS-inch dianieterwastewater main will be
extended from the lift station to the existing westerly right-of-way of 191h Street. The
Annexation Agreement requires the applicant to extend the IS-inch line along 191h Street and the
Hayden Bridge Stub prior to the street construction., The public system as constructed will have
sufficient capacity and sufficient depth to serve the annexation area. The applicant is required to
construct a public gravity wastewater system to serve the annexation area, as needed, in addition
to the IS-inch wastewater main described above.
ATTACHMENT 1 - 9
Date Rec~jved
MAr< v 7008
PIAn nOr- D I
'. :. ..-
. ;.
.,
LCLGBC Staff Ana1ys~s (Ee SP08-16)- January IS, 2008
Page S of 10 '
Stormwater - Springfield staff indicates an existing 18-inch public stormwater management
system is located adjacent to the west line of the annexation area, approximately 240 f~t north of
the centerline of Vera Street, Another existing] 2-inch public stormwater management system is
located adjacent to the west line of the annexation area, approximately 170 feet south of the
centerline of Vera Street. The applicant will be allowed to connect to either or both of these
existing public stormwater management systems, but will be required to provide pre-treatment
for 100 percent of newly paved surfaces, using such methods as double chambered catch basins
with oil filtration media or a water quality manhole, Additionally, a minimum of 50 percent of
the non-building rooftop runoff impervious. surfaces on the annexation area shall be treated
vegetatively, using methods such as a bioswale. The applicant will be required to maintain the
post-developed runoff rate of flow equal to or below the pre-development rate of flow, The city
grants development approval only where adequate public and/or private stormwater management
system provisions have been made as determined by the public works director, consistent with.
the city's Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual.
Streets - Springfield staff indicates the annexation area has frontage on 19th Street which is under
the jurisdiction of Lane County, Along this frontage, 19th Street is not improved. The section of
19th Street right-of-way north of Yolanda Street is a local access road (LAR) which does not
receive county maintenance, On this section of 19th Street, the travel way is an unimproved
gravel surface, approximately 12,feet wide. Such a surface is not adequate to accommodate
. additional traffic that would be aJ~cipated from the applicants' proposed development, and is not
adequate to meet fire and life safety department needs.
19th Street is designated as a collector street in Springfield's Conceptual Street Map. The
appli~ants are required to dedicate land adjacent to tIie westerly line of the existing right-of-way
sufficient to construct a fully-improved 2/3 width colle~tor street (complete with gutter, curb,
pavement, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees) along the 19th Street frontage of the
annexation area. The applicants are required to dedicate a right-of-way of 60 fe~t through the
annexation area to facilitate the east-west connection of 19th Street with the existing Vera Street
right-of-way and pavement and to construct the easterly extension of Vera Street to an urban
standard from the west line of ' the annexation area to 19th Street (complete with gutter, curb,
pavement, sidewalks, street lights, and stree~ trees). The applicants are required to provide for an
improved secondary access to the annexation area via either the extension of 19th Street to
Yolanda Avenue or the improvement of Hayden Bridge Stub from 19th Street and easterly to the
existing improved pavement. Further street/transportation requirements are outlined within the
annexation agreement between the applicants and the city.
Solid waste mana~err.i~nt - Private firms and individuals collect and transport solid waste to the
~e County administered landfill.
Communication facilities - Various providers offer both wire and wireless communication
services in the Springfield-Springfield metropolitan area. Existing providers and those entering
the market have the capability to provide service to this area. .
~
:':.\.~':
,.
....
ATT ACHMENT 1 - -1 Q
Date Received
MAR 1 Z008
PlAnnAr~ R.I
LCLGBC Staff Analysis (ECSP08-16)- January 15.2008
Page 6 of 10
Land use controls - The annexation area is within Springfield's portion of the urban growth
boundary. Through an intergovernmental agreement between Lane County and the City of
Springfield, the city already has planning and building jurisdiction for this property. The city
will continue to administer land use controls after annexation. '
The minimum level of required services are either immediately available or can be provided
within a reasonable future time frame as needed. This request is consistent with boundary
commission policies and this standard.
Consider the comprehensive plan's economic, demographic, and sociological trends and
projections and its environmental policies, pertinent to the proposal. ORS 199.410(3)(d) and
199.462(1)
The annexation proposal is consistent with the Metro Plan, as it is an incremental step in
implementing the long-range plan for this area. The UGB, land uses, and policies in the Metro
Plan were developed to meet the future needs of the metropolitan community. The proposed use
is consistent with the long-range plans for the area. '
. This proposed annexation is consistent with this.boundary commission standard.
Recommendation
,
~'>
4
The boundary commission staff recommends that the proposed annexation to the City of
Springfield (BC File EC SP 08 - 16) be approved without the hearing and staff report as required
by ORS 199.466,
]f a public hearing is requested, t~e proposal will be heard at the next available boundary
commission public hearing. ]f none is requested it will be approved and effective January 25,
2008 (ORS 199.466 and ORS 199.519). .
###
Date Received
MAR12DDB
LCLGBC Staff Analysis (EC SP08.- ]6)- January 15,2008
. Page 7 of 10
Planner: BJ
ATTACHMENT 1 - 11
Sign and return this form to the boundary commission office ONLY if you desire that a public
hearing be held. Office: 99 East Broadway, Suite 400, Eugene, Oregon 97401-3111
Pursuant to ORS 199.466. I REQUEST THAT A PUBLlC HEARING and STAFF
STUDY be conducted on an annexation of territory to the City of Springfield (EC SP 08 - 1 p), as.
required by ORS 199.461. This form must be filed in the commission office no later than 5:00
p.m,. January 25. 2008.
Reason for public hearing:
Date
Signature
Title
,~. .
Representing
Note: If you or your agency requests a public. hearing, the commission asks that you attend the
requested hearing.
pI: LCBC: L:\BC\EXF\200f!IECSP0816 SN.DQC
Lasl Saved: January 15.2008
ATTACHMENT 1 - 12
Date ReCeived
MAR 7 2008'
Planner: BJ
L~QBC S.!af[ Analysis (ECSP08-16)- January 1$,2008
Page 8 of 10
MAP No.1 VICINITY MAP
Annexation to Springfield (Jackson)
ECSP08-l6
GENERAL LOCATION OF
. ANNEXATION AREA
Oackson)
(EC SP 08-16
, .
A
(
8
UGB
.. Jackson
City streets
- Arteria'. major
-.Arterial, minor
City Limits
. .. SPR
N
w~,
0.4 0 0.4 0.8 Miles
I
,_4' ~.
Date Received
MAR 7 2008
Planner: BJ,
LCLGBC Staff Analysis (ECSP08- ]6)-January 15.2008
Page 9 of 10
ATTACHMENT 1 -13
.
MAP No.2 SITE MAP
Annexation to Springfield (Jackson)
EC SP 08 - 16
. .-------
",~' : .f' .
. .
/-,-
. .
ANNEXATION AREA
Includes part of TL 2000, 17-03-24-31;
: Owned DY D!Uriel and Sharmon Jackson
(EC SP 08 - 16}
I.
. ........ -... ' .:.. . \::ffi............_- ....frn.. ...;
)'CO..........;rntJ....:........... ". '; 1
: . : : :
. .:.
. ..
Date Received
MAR . 7 2008
;r-
. .. .:O~
- ~ UGB
_ Jackson
o Tax Lots
City Limits
SPR
N
+
c. .. Planner: BJ
~_<;LGBC Staff AT;I~ysis (ECSPOS-16)-January 15,2008
.Page'!O:of1'O":-:- .~ .
,.. s.; .
....,,~. ; ATTACHMENT 1 -14
200
I
o
200
400 Feet I
, r
RESOLUTION-NO 07-57
A RESOLUTION INITIATING ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF
SPRINGFIELD AND REQUESTING THAT THE LANE COUNTY LOCAL GOVERNMENT
BOUNDARY COMMISSION APPROVE THE ANNEXATION BY EXPEDITED PROCESS.
WHEREAS, the City received an application to annex approximately 9 acres into the City of Springfield
on February 27, 2007, said territory being described as follows:
Township 17 South, Range 3 West, Sectiori 24, Map 31, portion of Tax Lot 2000 as more particularly
described in Exhibit A of this Resolution.
WHEREAS, the territory to be annexed is within the Eugene-SpringfieldUrban ,Growth Boundary, and is
proximate to the City limits; and, .
WHEREAS, the City Council is authorized by ORS 199.490(2)(a)(A) to initiate annexation upon
receiving consent in writing from a majority of the electors registered in the territory proposed to be
annexed and written consent from more than half of the owners of land in the territory propos~d to be
annexed, who also own more than half ofthe land in the territory proposed to be annexed and of real
property therein representing more than half of the assessed value of all real property in the territory
proposed to be annexed; and, ,
.-
WHEREAS, the property owners oi;Jhe certain territory described in Exhibit A signed a consent to annex
(Exhibit C); and,
.
WHEREAS, two registered voters reside within the territory and have signed a consent to annex (Exhibit
C); and,
WHEREAS, the City Council is authorized by Springfield Development Code 6.030(2)(a) and ORS
222.111 and other applicable Oregon Revised Statutes to initiate annexation when the territory in the
. annexation proposal can be provided with the minimum level of key urban. facilities and services in an
orderly and efficient manner as defmed in Eugene-Springfield Metro Area General Plan Metro Plan
Policies 8.a and b, Page TI-C-4; and where there will be a logical area and time within which to deliver
urban services and facilities; and . .
WHEREAS, minimum level key urban facilities and services are defined in the Eugene-Springfield Metro
Area General Plan, page V-3 as wastewater service, stormwater service, solid waste .management, water
service, fire and emergency medical services, police protection, city-wide parks and recreation programs,
electric service, land use controls, communications facilities and services, and public schools on a district-
wide basis; and
WHEREAS, the territory proposed to be annexed can be immediately provided with a minimum level of
key urban facilities and'services with the exception of public sanitary sewer service, public stormwater
management service and street improvements, which are being provided for in an Annexation Agreement
which has been negotiated with City staff and the Owners, as described in Attachment 2: Informational
Attachment, Case Number LRP2007-00009 and Attachment 4: Annexation Agreement; and
WHEREAS, an annexation agreement has been proposed for execution by the CitY of Springfield and
Daniel and Shannon Jackson; (Owners) which will memorialize the Owner's commitment, agreement and
obligation to meet the City's requirements for provision of the minimum level of key urban services as
required for an affirmative City recommendation for the annexation request; and
ATTACHMENT 1 -15
WHEREAS, the City Manager is authorized to forWard this resolution supporting the applicant's request
to the Lane County Local Government Boundary Commission when an annexation agreement is entered
into by the City of Springfield and Daniel and Shannon J ackson; ~Owners); and
WHEREAS, the City Manager is authorized to forward this resolution supporting the applicant's request
for expedited processing to the Lane County Local Government Boundary Commission.
NOW THEREFORE BASED ON THE FOREGOING RECITALS, THE COMMON COUNClL OF
THE CITY OF SPRlNGFIELD DOES RESOL VB AS FOLLOWS:
Section l: The Common Council of the City of Springfield does hereby recommend approval of the
annexation of the subject territories to the City by the Lane County Local Government Boundary
Commission, Lane County, Oregon, said territories being des~ribed as follows: .
Township 17 South, Range 3 West, Section.24, Map 31, portion of Tax Lot 2000, said territory
being included in the property more particularly described in Exhibit A of this Resolution.
Section 2: This resolution shall take effect upon adoption by the Common Council of the City of
Springfield and approval by the Mayor.
Section 3: The City Council recommends that the Boundary Commission approve the proposed
annexation authorized by ORS 199.466 by expedited process without the study, public hearing and
adoption of final order required by ORS 199.461.
Section 4: The City Manager shall "fward this resolution supporting the applicant's request to the Lane
County Local Government Boundary Commission when an annexation agreement is entered into by the
City of Springfield and Daniel and Shannon Jackson (Owners) and upon receipt of evidence that the
annexation agreement has been recorded.
ADOPTED by the Common Council of the City of Springfield this 3rd day of December 2007 by a vote
of ~ for and -.J!. against.
APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Springfield this 3r.
AITEST:
.CityR~hun-
['r.v~. rl"~'::' I, 'lijlF;....Bt'l. Ui.1i\
~;..,:r!~i':'JH.", t:.l !,~ r'hUI1lC:.U
I' ,~ 1-n ....or. r~
,.."-\ '-' r ,\. \
.....)c:,. ,=:.-",,~ ~1fA\''l-\
DATE: -l~I-;:~ \ IS"'
OFFICE OF-elfv' ATTORNEY
ATTACHMENT f - 16.
RESOLUTION NO. 07-57
EXHIBIT A
i
i
,-
I
I
\
..
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
FOR
..AmiEnTION FUlU'OSES
LANDS OF:QANlEL L. AND ~ON L JACKSON
(pORTION OF TAX MAP 17-03-24-31. TAX LOT 2000)
.'
SITUATED in1.IDincorporated areainLane C~~ty. State of Oregon in the Southwest 1/4 of Section
24, Township 17 South. Range 3 West of the WillaInette Mer:icUan and descnced as follow,s:
BEING a portion of the lands that ~e conveyed to Daniel L. and Shannon Batty in that certain
Special Warranty Deed that was recorded ~y 16, 1990 in Ree11632R at Reception N:Umber
9022540 in the Official Records of Lane County, State of Oregon, said portion being more
particularly descn"bed as follows:
Commencing at a point 17.42 c!mins north of a point where tIle East line of the William C. Spencer
Donation Land Claim Numbel~o, Notification Number 3265, intersects the line between Section
.24 and Section 25. Townsl:!iP 17 South. Range 3 West-ofthe W~etteMeridian; thence North 89"
42' 33" West 393.00 feet and North. 00" 06' 16" West 22~.00 feet to the southwest comer of said
lands that were conveyed in the aboVe deed. which point lies on the existing city limi~ line oftlie
City ofSpringfie1d and is the TRUE FOINT OF BEGINNING of the lands b~gdescn'bedherein;
THENCE leaving said TRUE FOINT OF BEG~G and along said city limits line and west .
line of said landS that were conveyed in said deed, NORm 00. 06' 16" WEST 900 FEET, more or
less, to an angle point In the Urban GmwthBoun~ of the City of Springfield; rilENCE,leaving
said city limits line and said ~st line of said lands that were conveyed in said deed, NORm 63"
35' EAST 435 FEET, mor~ or less, along said Urban Growth BoundaIy to an angle point in said
boundaIythatlies on the cast line of said lands that were conveyed in said deed; THENCE,l~aving
said Urb~ Growth Boundary and alc;mg said east line of said lands that were conveyed in said deed.
SOUTH 00. 06' 24" EAST 1100 FEaT, more or less, to the southeast comer of said lands that were
conveyed in the said deed; AND THENCE, along the south line of said lands that were conveyed
in the said deed NORTH 89- 42'33" WEST 393.00 FEET RETURNINGto.the TRUE FOINT OF
BEGINNING Slid ~ONTAINING 9.0 Aa,rnS, ~ore or less. '
. Date Received
~EC D !J 20D!}
Planner: BJ
'w.~~,. (ZI W7
REGISTERED
PROFESSIONAL
SURVEYOR
ATTACHMENT 1 -17
. .~
iii
t:.~
B~~
~~~I"
"~~~~i
18:: ~ V-:
=~!8~~
2~~11~
I~~~
~tiDi
~~
1I;i..
~
:.;
I "
.~
-t-{
I
III
. Ii I
"I n
. n
EXHIBIT .8
....
, ...... ~;--
._ ';~.i
""..
I
I
I
. I
/:
..,. ... I
. I
___________J
ATTACHMENT 1 ~18
~~..
· ; Ii;
~-;, II; if J
"
I
Date Received
DEe f) ,. 2008
Planner: BJ
...
~
s
'-
I
I
..
I
~
s
LANE COUNTY LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION
99 East Broadway
Suite 400
Eugene, OR 97401-3111
(541) 682-4425
March 27,2008 FAX (541) 682-2635
TO: Amy Sowa, Recorder, City of Spr4tgfield
FROM: Paula L, Taylor, Executive Officer
SUBJECT: . EC SP 08 - 16 (Expedited Procedure)
ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO TIIE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD
(Jackson)
By this correSpondence, let it be known that:
1, A petition for annexation of territory to the City of Springfield-located in north Springfield,
nqrth of Yolanda A venue, west of 19th Street, east of Vera Street (T17S R03W S24 Map 31 part
of tax lot 2000)-was fi]e~1>n December 31, 2007, with the Lane County Local Government
Boundary Commission in ac~ordance with ORS 199.466 and ORS 199.490(2)(a)(A).
2. An analysis was prepared by the boundary coJllII!ission staff with a recommendation of approval
and was sent, on January 15, 2008, to the Lane boundary commission members; Lane County
commissioners; Lane County Land Management Division; Lane County Environmental Health
Division; City of Springfield; Willamalane Park and Recreation District; Daniel and Shannon
Jackson; and Jeanette Applauso at Branch Engineering,
3. No request for public hearing was received by 5:00 p.m., January 25, 2008,
4. This annexation proposal, described in attached Exhibit A 'and shown on attached map Exhibit B,
is hereby approved and effective January 25, 2008 (ORS 199.466 and ORS 199,519).
Please acknowledge receipt of this correspondence. '
NOTE: In ~ccordance withORS 199.510(2)(c), the annexation area is hereby part of the Lane County
Metropolitan Wastewater Service District and the Willamalane Park and Recreation District.
Attachments
cc: Daniel and Shannon Jackson
Willamalane Park and Recreation District
ATTACHMENT 1 - 19
"
EXHffirr A
B,eg at apt 1,149.72 ft N of a pt where the Eli of the William C. Spencer DLC No. 50 intersects
with the Ii between S24 and S25 T17S R03W WM;
th N89042'33"W 393.00 ft and NOoo06' 16"W 225.00 ft mil to apt, sd pt being on the existing
Springfield city limits and the TPOB;
th alg sd city limits NOoo06'16"W 920.00 ft mil to apt;
th leaving sd city limits Ii N63035'E 435.00 ft mil to apt;
th SOoo06 '24"E 1, 100ft mil to apt;
th N89042'33"W 393.00 ft mil to the TPOB, all in Lane County, Oregon.
Iii.
~
LCBC:LCOG: L:\BC\LEGAL\2008\ECSP08/6 LGLDOC
Last Saved: March 25, 2008
EC SP 08 - 16
Page 1 of 1
ATTACHMENT 1 - 20
EXHffiIT B
~
.'
.,
.. .....
/.."
ANNEXATION AREA
Includes part of TL 2000, 17-03-24-31;
. Owned by Daniel and Shannon Jackson
"~ (EC SP 08 - 16)
:~
UGB
_ Jacks'on
o Tax Lots
City Limits
SPR
+'
EC SP08 -16
Page 1 of 1
200
I
o
200
400 Feet
I "I
ATTACHMENT 1 - 21