The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutComments PWE 1/26/2009 ~~. j Memorandum City of Springfield Date: ,'January26, 2009 To: Andy Limbird, Urban Planner From: Eric Walter, Civil Engineer Subject: SUB2009-00002, Proden Partition I h'ave reviewed the materials provided with the subject application. The recommended [mdings arid conditions outlined below are provided for your use in preparing the land-use decision. j SANITARY SEWER Finding: Section 4.3-I05.A of the SDC requires that sanitary sewers shall be installed to serve each 'new development and to connect developments to existing mains. Additionaliy, installation of sanitary sewers shall provide.sufficiimt access for ,. , . . maintenance activities. : ' . , / Finding:' The subject p~operty has an existing septic'system With a septic tank and drain field; however plans do not include the location of the existing drain field. Finding: The applicant has proposed Parcel I to be served by the existing 8 inch public I . wastewater line located in Vera Street by connecting to an existing 6" lateral located just east of the new property line. A private sanitary sewer easement is being proposed on Parcel 2 for the benefit of Parcel I for extending a private sanitary line to this 6" lateral. j Finding: The existing house on Parcel 2 wi;l b~ required to be connected 'to sanitary sewer; however, plans submitted does not show connection to the public sanitary sewer. " , J Condition: Prior to approval of the Final Plat, the applicant shall show the location of , existing septic drain field. Obtain necessary permits ,and make provisions for decommissioning the existing septic system. '. / Condition: Prior to approval of the Final Plat, the applicant shall construct the 'pro;osed , sanitary sewer connection to the existing house located on Parcel 2. ' . , STORMWATER MANAGEMENT !Pinding: Section 4.3-11O:D of the SDC requires iliat run-off from a development shall be directed to 'an approved stormwater management system with suffiCient capacitY, to accept the discharge; , ',' . , . II.: . D~te Heceived:--5pi ;z..p9 Planner: AL . j Finding: The overall stormwater design including curb, gutter, and street improvements for the subject site was alreaily completed under a previous subdivision application in the 19,90's: All existing gutter down spouts from the existing home on Parcel 2 are connected to curb-line weep hole drains. The applicant has indicated the new home that will be located on Parcel I will connect to the existing curb weep hole drains located in Vera Street thus satisfying Section 4.3-110. D & E. PUBLIC STREETS. SIDEWALKS & IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS Finding: Section 4.2-1 OS.G.2 of the Springfield Development Code requires that j whenever a proposed land divisionor development will increase traffic on the City street \ system and that development has any unimproved street frontage abutting a fully improved street, that street frontage shall be fully improved to City specifications. j Finding: The subject property to be partitioned is already fronting Vera Street and Grand Vista streets that are fully improved where no further street improvements will be necessary for supporting the proposed partition. . UTILITIES. EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY Finding: Section 4.3-140.A of the SDC requires applicants proposing developments / make arrangements with the City and each utility provider for th~ dedication of utility . easements necessary, to fully service the development or land beyond the development area. The minimum width for public.utility easements adjacent to street rights of ways shall be 7 feet. The minimum width for all other public utility easements shall be 7 feet. The Public Works Director may require alarger easement to allow for adequate maintenance. I Finding: The applicant has indic~ted on plans an existing 7 foot public utility easements located along the frontage of Vera Street and Grand Vista, thus satisfying Section 4.3- 140.A of the SDC. j. Finding: The applicant has indicated on plans a private water and power line, for serving Parcell, running longitudinally in the existing 7 foot public utility easement fronting Vera Street. With the exception to crossing perpendicular to the easements, public utility easements may not contain private utilities. Finding: A private sanitary sewer easement is being proposed on Parcel 2 forthe benefit J of Parcel I for extending a private sanitary sewer line to an existing. 6" lateral at the j north-west property corner. Condition: Prior to Final Plat approval, the applicant shall record a private sanitary sew~r" easement at the north-west corner of Parcel 2 as shown on plans for the benefit of Parcel I for extending a 6" sanitary sewer lateral. ' j Condition: Prior to Final Plat approval, the applicant shall coordinate with SUB and other . utility companies as necessary for serving Parcel' I and remove the proposed water and power lines from the existing 7' PUE. Dat, f~6Ceived; /6~4,,'1 Planner: AL T I FEES AND PERMITS :! Ii SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT CHARGE: 'I: Pay applic~ble Systems Development Charges when building permits are issued for developm6nts within the City limits or within the Springfield Urban Growth Boundary. (The cost lelates to the amount of increase in impervious surface area, transportation trip rates, and plumbing fixture units. Some exceptions apply to Springfield Urban Growth areas.) [Spnngfield Code Chapter II, Article II] , I., . . I . Systems Development Charges (SDC's) win apply to the construction of buildings, and site improtements within the subject site. The Charges win be based upon the rates' in effect at th~ time of permit submittal for buildings or site improvements on each portion . or phase of the development. II ' . SANITARY SEWER IN-LIEU-OF -ASSESSMENT CHARGE: II Pay a Sanitary Sewer In"Lieu-of-Assessment charge in addition to the regular connection fees if the property or portions of the property being developed have not previously been assessed of, otherwise participated in the cost of a public sanitary sewer. Contact the Engineering Division to determine ifIn-Lieu-of-Assessment is applicable. lOrd 5584] II Ii PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE FEES: '~I' ., i. . It is the reSponsibility of the private developer to fund the public infrastructure. II OTHER mTY PERMITS: I . Encroacturlent Permit or Sewer Hookup Permit (working within right-of-way or public easements)' example: new tap to the public storm or sanitary sewer, or adjusting a manhole. [The current rate is $135 for processing plus applicable fees and deposits] " Land & Di~inage Alterati~n Permits (LDAP). [Contact the Springfield Public Works Departrnerit @ 726-5849 for appropriate applications/requirements] ~. - . . I , ADDITIONAL PERMITS/APPROVALS MAYBE NECESSARY: I . . Metropolitan Wastewater Management Commission (pump station, sanitary . . se",.ers 24 inches or larger) , · Lade County Facilities Permit (If the project is within Lane County jurisdiction) . Railroad (If the project crosses a railroad) , · Oregon Department of Transportation (If the project is within ODOT jurisdiction) . Di~ision of State .Lands (Storm water discharge, wetlands) · Or~~on Department of Environmentai Quality (Erosion control (5 acres or . greater), pump station, storm water discharge, wetlands) . U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Storm water discharge,"wetlands) , ~!~:~:~~~%:;,-ed: li!;!$'9