The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutNotes, Meeting APPLICANT 2/26/2009 " \' ~ "Zol\l 'ZoN ~2009-00004 & EImI2009-0000S ~ asper Area School Siting Springfield School District Prepared by: ' Steve Hopkins, Planner II City of Springfield, Development Services Department 2/26/2009 RECEIVED blJfJr~Me~ f.lavujou:f By: 2-Zb-fPJ This package was prepared for the Springfield School District to facilitate discussion of the annexation and development of,a future public school site in the Jasper area. It is based on the material submitted on February 12, 2009; a~d the Springfield Development Code applicable on February 26, 2009. Spfingfield School District ' Page 1 I Contents Site Inform ation ..................................................................................................................................... .......3 Gene ra I Notes...........................................................,..............................,................................ .....................3 Springfie Id Development Cod e .........................................:..........................................................................:4 Comments from Public Works. Transport~tion ................ ....... ... ...... .....,.........:.............................:...............S Answers to Subm itted Questions.......................................................................... ........................................6 Maps .................................. .............. ....... ....................................................... ................................................ 7 Appl ication Fa rms ..........,..............................................:........................,.........................:..................... :....13 RECEIVED ~-,. Ii By: 2-2(,,-01 Springfield School District Page 2 Site Information Addresses: 36191 Japer Rd; 1109 Linda Lane; 1189 Linda Lane . I Tax lot Zone 118-02-04 TLl502 LDR l18-02-09 TLl03(West of parkwa. y) LMI 118-02-09 TLl03 (East of Parkway) LMI Metro Plan Residential Residential Industrial Acres 36 151 The Drinking Water Protection Overlay is also applicable. Refer to the map. Outside city limi.ts. General Notes Any property outside the city limi.ts must be annexed to receive public services. A school is a Discretion'ary Use in the LMI (Light Medium Industrial) and the LDR (Low Density Residential) Zones. This requires a public hearing with the Planning Commission. Required applications (other apps may be required based on the specific site design): Annexation (Type IV review) Discretionary Use (Type 1lI review) Site Plan (Type II review) A partition or subdivision application may be required if the school rustrict wants to buy only a portion of the property. A subdivision or partition requires Type II review. The annexation must be completed first, then the site 'plan and DU can be processed concurrently. . By state law, a final decision on a land use application is required within 120 days of submittal of a complete application. It is city policy to issue a final decision within 75 days. 5.1-130 Type II Applications (Administrative) Type II decisions are made by the Director after public notice, but wjthout a public hearing, unless appealed. 5.1-135 Type III AppHcations (Quasi-Judicial) Type 1lI decisions are made by the Planning Commission after public notice and a public hearing. 5.1-140 Type IV Procedure (Legislative) Type IV decisions are. made by the City Council after public notice.an< RtC~1 V ED Springfield School District .._ Page 3 -,.. i By: 2 -2b-09 Springfield Development Code This is a summary of some of the pr~)Cess and design requirements contained in the SDC. . 5.7-100 Annexation 5.9-110 Siting of Schools (process) 5.17-100 Site Plan Review (general site plan criteria) 4.6-125 Vehicle parking -Maximum number of spaces allowed (2 for each classroom, plus 1 for each 100 sf of assembly area). 4.6-155 Bicycle Parking-Minimum number of spaces required (1 per 8 students) 4.7-195 Public/Private Elementary/Middle Schools (specific design elements for the campus and the building) RECEIVED '..i By: Z-U-09 Springfield School District Page 4 -, Comments from Public Works Transportation FROM: SUBJECT: Jon Driscoll, Trarisportation Engineer in Training ZON2009-00004 & ZON2009-00005 Springfield School District Development Issues Meeting Public Works Transportation Comments The Transportation Division has reviewed the subject application for the possible development .of either the property at 36191 Jasper Road or at 1109 & 1089 Linda Lane. The following comments and questions are in response to the first half of the application's Question #5, which reads" Are there any issues related to the future road system in the area and costs related to improvements to accommodate future elementary school?" . During the design and development of these parcels your design staff needs to take into account the necessanj connectivity of Springfield's to and through your site. You are encouraged to work closely with Transportation staff in providing streets that will run through the site. The following are roadways presently conceptually planned and would be part of the expense of developing these sites: . Linda Lane Property o South 57th Street is planned to cut through. the NE corner of the property,. connecting Morning View Subdivision (north of this property) with the partially constructed South 57th Street built as part of Jasper Meadows Sixth Addition (to the east of this properhj) and continuing southerly to the south side of the properhj.This is to connect through south and . east to Bob Straub Parkway. o Mineral Way is planned to continue westward from Jasper Meadows Sixth Addition through this property and connect with Linda Lane. Jasper Roatt/Bob Straub Property o South 60th Street will continue south from Jasper Meadows Second Addition through this properhj. . o Our desire is to IUlve thefirst block on both sides of Bob Straub free of driveways to support greater safety and efficienClj. o It is possible that another road will connect with Bob Straub near the SW corner of the properhj, and run through this properhj to its eastern boundanj. . For safety reasons, the Transportation Division is not in favor of a single site development building on both sides of Bob Straub Parkway, and thereby producing/encouraging heamj traffic loads back and forth across the Parkway. . Realize that for either site - but particularly the Jasper Road/Bob Straub Property - it is expected that you would slUlre in the expense WIll to bilild out the Bob Straub Parkway - as you~ulfiJ1f ~ning . . ben.ejit from it and adding substantial traffic to it. . n t: V E' VE 0 Springfield School District By: Page 5 2-U-DCj . Answers to Submjtted Questions 1. Would the City require a school site to abut existing City limits in order to be annexed, and what are the city's projections for growth and annexation in. this vicinity? What would be the annexation fee for the school district? Property must abut the city limi.ts to be annexed; Refer to SDC 5.7-140(A). The planning application fee for annexation is listed on the fee schedule. The annexation fee is addressed in the, Annexation Agreement. This will be addressed in more detail by John Tamulonis. There isn't an official population estimate for this area. The best estimate is from a market analysis prepared for the City by E.D. Hovee & Company in 1999. That analysis estimated that nearly 2,300 homes will be built in the Jasper-Natron area. I ' Dwelling: type I Single family, detached I Single family, attached I Apartment/condo I total I # of units 1,280 510 490 2,280 % 56 22 22 100 2. Will there be adequate fire protection within five years for an elementary school? This will be addressed in more detail by Gilbert Gordon. One of the requirements for annexation is that the minimum level of key urban facilities and services, as defined in the Metro Plan, can be provided in an orderly, efficient and timely manner. 3. Will the school d,istrict be required to participate in the cost or reimburse the city for extension of the sewer trunk line to this area? Can costs be projected at this point? The cost is usually incorporated into the Annexation fee. There will be a System Development Charge that is assessed when connect:iTIg to the sewer line. This will be addressed in more detail by PW. -J 4. 'What might be requirements of the city for storm drainage and detention, and would there be off-site costs? Are there wetland issues in this vicinity? The drainage question will be answered by PW. There'are wetlands on a portion of this site. Refer to the map. 5. Are there any issues related to the future road system in the area and costs related to improvements to accommodate a future elementary school? Issues and costs related to other utilities (e.g. gas, eiectrical)? f'. F ~VED Jasper Rd. is under Lane County jurisdiction. Unless it ~s annexed ~1WJh"""", U county will determine the necessary improvements to serve the scliool. Springfield School District " -i', ... Page 6 By~ 2-2(,-09 Maps o Zoning o Land use designation (Metro Plan) o Infrastructure o Floodplain & Drinking Water Protection Over]ay Springfield School District RECEIVED By: 2- Zk-Cfi Page 7 RECEIVED '.,1 By:2-U-DCj Springfield School District Page 8 ~ J u --------- ~ '" Zones - D Subject pr ~,..."" ~f , , , , Urban Growth Boundary D Tax lots \ Zoni ng _ High Density Residential Low Density Residential _ Community Commercial L j Light Medium Industrial _ Special Heavy Industrial /' Springfield School District --.J' ~ , - I l;RN3t!lj 18020400 1502 103 18020900 103 N W*E /J s Feb 2009 Page 9 ~~~~ > W o , . w a: . . ~ ca - -- o I - I <S- (J I ~ N \ -~ / \ ~ II ,"'" u ~.~ 11'1 Metro Plan o Subject Property _ Urban Growth Boundary D Tax Lots Metro Plan r::I Commercial o High Density Residential _ Ught Medium Industrial o Low Density Residential o Medium Density Residentia i::J Special Heavy Industrial 1___________... Springfield School District --------------- II ~J f-, I I ~ LMLVERNON I I -"-~ ----- o:)s, \ \:>~ ~~J I l .:;/ 18020400 1502 ~ R ) ~ ) OJ, o OJ\ (/), ~ ~\ OJ ensity Residential 103 ~l I' 77--/- --- N W+E ~ I \ L ~ Page 10 s Feb 2009 ! (.) W CI:I . ==- ~ ~~~ <s- ~ ~ -~ . . ~ CO ____ I ~ - f I '-...J w C I > ~ N - \ , W \'.l, '- , 0 . . . rW . . > ~f~VERNO a: co ,r ~ 18020400 1:. ~ 1502 ~ \ Co -, <& -p 103 \ j I. ; ~ 18020900 103 I nfrastructu re L - Storm Lines - Sanitary Lines Conceptual Streets I Railroad - Railroad - Urban Growth Boundary D Subject property City Limits (poly) . Inside the City limits N W+E s . Feb 2009 ---, !I! ! ! I' ! ! !! ! Springfield School District Page 11 T') I~ I :--- !! L ~ ! ! ,~: , ~- '" 18020400 " 1502 Springfield School District ~ ~ 103 Wetlands, Floodplain & DWP D Subject property - Major Metro Roads Local Wetlands Inventory _YES _ FEMA 100 year flood zone city limits _SPR -:-' Drinking Water Protection ~ ...... I , ~ ,~ N W*E s Feb 2009 ~ Page 12 Application Forms Annexation Discretionary Use Site Plan Review Application fees RECEIVED -.", Ii By: Springfield School District Page 13