Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNotes, Work PLANNER 6/27/2008 . ' City of Springfield Development Services Department 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 SITE PLAN REVIEW PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Project Name: Alford Don Ward / ADW LLC Duplex Site Plan Project Proposal: Construct an attached single family dwelling and two detached single family dwellings, in two phases, on a vacant residential lot. Case Number: PRE2008-00041 Project Address: 6421 & 6423 Main Street Assessors. Map and Tax Lot Number(s): 17-02-34-43, TL 403 Zoning: Medium Density. Residential (MDR) Overlay District(s): Hillside Development (HD) Applicable Refinement Plan: . Refinement Plan Designation: , Metro Plan Designation: Medium Density Residential (MDR) Pre-Submittal Meeting Date: June 27, 2008 Application Submittal Deadline: December 24, 2008 Associated Applications: 2001-10-216; 2001-10-217; SUB2005-00066; ZON2005-00043 F:~~~~~eRiN.G~IEl!l>lI>ESlEl!oe:~~~~E%:'EWMtll~~iill-~~~~1 I Proiect Planner Land Use Planninq Andy Limbird 726-3784 I Transportation Planninq Enqineer Transportation Jon Driscoll 726-3679 I Public Works Civil EnQineer Utilities Eric Walter 736-1034 I Public Works .Civil EnQineer Sanitarv & Storm Sewer Eric Walter 736-1034 , Deputy Fire Marshal Fire and Life Safety Gilbert Gordon 726-2293 I Community Services Manaqer Buildinq Dave Puent 726-3668, 'rAeRl!(e~NiT'SII>ESlEl!OI!MENiI"o'IRE~.E:Wo'lil"E~MIr~iI!J!iI.liarJ..L IIaLErJEIiI!J!i!lIf1 . Applicant 'Owner Engineer Alford Don Ward Matthew Alan Sloan LLC Stephen Keating ADW, LLC 1574 Coburg Rd. #880 Keating Engineering LLC 1574 Coburg Rd. #880 Eugene, OR 97401 159 East 16th Avenue EUQene,OR 97401 EUQene,OR 97401 Revised 10{25{07 Date Received' 6/n /.;700( Planner: AL I I 'f TENTATIVE SITE PLAN ,REVIEW APPLICATION PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST PLANNING o Application fee - discuss the applicable fees ,0 Copy of the Site Plan reduced to 8'h"x 11" Complete, Incomplete See Planning Note(s) 1 o Copy of the deed and a preliminary title report issued within the past 30 days documenting ownership and listing all encumbrances. If the applicant is not the property owner, written permission from the property owner is required. Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) 2 o Brief narrative explaining the purpose of the development, the existing use of the property, and any additional information that may have a bearing in determining the action to be taken. The narrative should also include the proposed number of employees and future expansion plans, if known. Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) See Note 1iiii$I.... I!:'iliJ ~ ~ Iiiii$I W' r;;:;?,I IZ!SJ Iiiii$I ~ o Site Plan Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) ~. ~ ~. See Note ~ ~ f5<<I ~ Iiiii$I ~ See Note ~ ~ Revised 1O{25{07 8 V2' X ll",Copy of Site Plan Deed and Preliminary Title Report Brief Narrative Prepared by an Oregon Licensed Architect, Landscape Architect, or Engineer '. Proposed buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area applicable to the parking requirement for the proposed use(s)), setbacks from property lines, and distance between buildings Location and height of existing or proposed fences, walls, outdoor equipment, storage, trash receptacles, and signs Location, dimensions, and number of typical, compact, and disabled parking spaces; including aisles, wheel bumpers, directional signs, and striping Dimensions of the development area, as well as area and percentage of the site proposed for buildings, structures, parking and Date Received:~/.z"O! Planner: AL ~ ~ 3 vehicular areas, sidewalks, patios, and other impervious surfaces Observance of solar access requirements as specified in the applicable zoning district On-site loading areas and vehicular and , pedestrian circulation Location, type, and number of bicycle parking spaces Area and dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for common open spaces, recreational areas, and other similar public and semi-public uses Location of existing and proposed transit facilities ~ NfA f':Jl ~ ~ ~ NfA Iilljiil lEi ~ ~ o Phased Development Plan Where applicable, the Site Plan application must inclu'de a phasing plan indicating any proposed phases for development, including the boundaries and sequencing of each phase. Phasing must progress in a sequence promoting street connectivity between the various phases of the development and accommodating other . required public improvements, including but not limited to, sanitary sewer, stormwater management, water, and electricity. The applicant must indicate which phases apply to the Site Plan application being submitted. Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) See Note I'fi:1I ~ ~ Phased Development Plan' o Landscape Plan Complete Incomplete III ~ ~ ~ See Planning Note(s) .4 5 ~ ,~ ~ 6 Drawn by a Landscape Architect Location and dimensions of landscaping and open space areas to include calculation of landscape coverage Screening in accordance with SDC 4.4-110 Written description, 'including specifications, of 'the permanent irrigation system Location and type of street trees List in chart form the proposed types of landscape materials (trees, shrubs, ground cover). Includ~ in the chart genus, species, common name, quantity, size, spacing and method of planting ~ ~ ~ ~ NfA 7 o Architectural Plan Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) ~ Revised 10{25{07 Exterior elevations of all buildings and Date Received: 6/n~! Planner: AL . I ~ ~. structures proposed for the development site, including height Conceptual floor plans o On-Site Lighting Plan Complete Incomplete See Planning , Note(s) III ~ 8 ~ ~ 10 Location, orientation, and maximum height of exterior light fixtures, both free standing and attached Type and extent of shielding, including cut-off angles and type of illumination, wattage, and luminous area Photometric test report for each light source ~ r;;:;?,I,', , ~ 9 Planning Notes: 1. Provide an 8Y2x11 size copy of the site plan with'the submittal. 2. Provide a current title report with the submittal. The Lien and Encumbrance report is not sufficient for purposes of the application, and is not intended as a title report as , stated on Page 3. , 3. Provide confirmation the proposed dwellings meet solar access requirements of the Development Code. 4. A Site Landscaping Plan ,prepared by a Landscape Architect will be required. 5. Site Landscaping Plan shall provide a tabulation of the total area attributed to landscaping. 6. A description of the site irrigation system shall be provided with the landscaping plan. 7. The Site Landscaping Plan shall provide the quantities and species of plants proposed for the development site. 8. A site lighting plan that shows the location of proposed outside fixtl!res will be required. 9. Provide cut sheets for the proposed outdoor light fixtures to be used on the site. 10.Photometric test information shall be provided for the proposed light fixtures. Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application: . Project narrative does not discuss measures to incorporate Hillside Development Overlay standards, tree felling, wetland protection, or other details of the project including the proposed access scheme. . The development site does not have frontage on a developed public street and therefore will be classified as a panhandle parcel for the purpose of review. . The Site Assessment Plan is not accurate, as there are now two separate properties comprising former Tax Lot 402 (see recorded Partition Plat 2006-P2034). A concurrence will be recjuired from the owners of (now) Tax Lots 404 and 405 agreeing to the proposed improvements as depicted on the site plan. Alternatively, the owners of TL 404 and 405 can be co-applicants. . The existing driveway functions as a multi-family driveway due to the existing and proposed number of units deriving access from one point. Therefore, the curb cut and driveway throat shall be increased to at least 24 feet wide in accordance with Table 4.2-2 of the Springfield Development Code. . ,An ODOT aq:ess permit may be required due to the number of units proposed to Revised 10{25{07 Date Received: ~h;l;J.OOO Planner: AL access the existing driveway, which was originally intended as a temporary access. . The entire driveway length will need to be paved at least 18 feet wide with 20 feet of clear width to meet requirements of the Springfield Development Code and Fire Code. . The proposed Fire Department turnaround does not meet minimum Fire Code dimensions for hammerhead depth, and also encroaches within the public wetland buffer area. Relocation of the turnaround and use of an acceptable Fire Department hammerhead template will be required. . The two proposed parallel parking spaces do not rT:1eet the required dimensions of SDC Table 4.6-1 (must be at least 24 feet long by 9 feet wide for standard parking spaces). Addi~ionally, these are shown within a public access and maintenance easement: . Provide a clear delineation of Phase 1 versus Phase 2 site work: What will be the interim status of the Phase 2 area following initial site grading and construction of Phase 1 (ie. landscaped?). Phase 2 development is conditional upon completion of an alternate access to a public street: in accordance with SDC 3.2-220.A.4, no more than 8 dwelling units can take access from a panhandle driveway (there are currently 6 units taking access from the single driveway). . The minimum setback from property line for Unit 4 should be increased to at least 10 feet to meet requirements of SDC 3.2-215. The ,east property line constitutes the rear yard due to the building and driveway orientation under panhandle parcel development standards. . A complete Hillside Development Overlay District application will be required concurrently with the Site Plan Review submittal, including a Geotechnical Report. o A concurrent Tree Felling Permit will be required for this development proposal if more than 5 trees greater than 5" diameter are proposed for removal. . The Site Assessrnent Plan must be updated as it does not depict a large oak tree near the southwest corner of proposed Unit 4 (this is shown as a small maple on the site plan). During a recent site visit, there were no maple trees observed ,in the locations where maples are indicated 'on the site assessment plan (trees are primarily cherry, ash, oak and other varieties). . Provide details on the housing style, which does not appear to be two duplexes (more like four single family dwellings). The City's Building Division advises there are special Building Code requirements for the dwelling unit styles as proposed. . Provide the recording num~er(s),for all existing easements benefiting the development site (including the joint access and maintenance easement, the access easement and public wetland buffer, and existing 7-foot Public Utility Easement). o Show the location and dimensions of the existing sanitary sewer stub, existing stormwater lines, and stormwater culverts running beneath the gravel driveway. . A detailed storm water plan'sheet will be required with the submittal. . The submitted plans are too small for legibility. Larger plans (minimum 24"x36") with a zoom-in detail on the Units 1-4 area will be required for submittal. . The proposed interconnection of all four units to a single sanitary sewer line,willlikely preclude future separation of ownership for the four units. . Public Works stormwater management guidelines will ~equire pretreatment before discharging stormwater runoff to an acceptable public system (ie. not the wetland). . Wetland protective fencing shall be re-installed where necessary and the large steel culvert pipe shalf be removed from the jurisdictional wetland area. ' o Correct typos on the plan sheets and the vicinity map (there are no numbered Avenues in Springfield). . o Provide copies of all easement documents recorded against the property. Revised 10{25{07 Dat"d~eceived' 6/n0utJ t Planner: AL ! ~ i" ( lAND DIVISION TENTATIVE PLAN APPLICATION , ' PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Transportation Engineer !Planner: Judy Johnduff Case#: PRE2008-00041 Applicant: Alford Don Ward, Duples at 6421 Main Street TRANSPORTATION o Right-of-Way Approach Permit application must be provided where the property has frontage on a'Lane County or an Oregon Department of Transportation .(ODOT) facility. . Complete Incomplete Iiiii$I ~ ~ See Transportation Note(s) See Note.#1 Copy of ROW Approach Permit Application o Traff.ic Impact Study ~ four (4) copies of a study prepared by a Traffic Engineer in accordance with SDC 4.2-105 Ao4. Traffic Impact Studies (TIS) allow the City to analyze and evaluate the traffic impacts and mitigation of a development on the City's transportation system. In general, a TIS must explain how the traffic'from a given development affects the transportation system in terms of safety, traffic operations, <jccess and mobility, and immediate and adjoining street systems. A TIS must also address, if needed, City, Metro Plan and state land use and transportation policies and objectives. Complete Incomplete See Transportation Note(s) NjA Traffic Impact Study ~ ~ o Land Division Tentative Plan Complete Incomplete See Transportation Note(s) NjA Location of existing and proposed street' lighting, including type, height, and area of illumination, Location of existing and proposed transit. , facilities Location and dimensions of existing and proposed driveways Location and width of all existing and proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways, and bike trails Location, widths, conditions, and names of all existing and proposed streets, alleys, dedications or other right-of-ways within or adjacent to the proposed land division. Proposed streets should also include approximate radius of curves and grades and relationship to any projected streets Date Received: "'f;ff}()J Planner: AL ~ ~ ~ 151, ", El NfA I1il ~ J>3?I ~ See Note #2 ~ I1il U?2J NfA ~ ~ Revised 10{25{07 ,> f':Jl l22SJ ~ N/A as shown on the Metro Plan, TransPlan, Conceptual Development Plan, or Conceptual Local Street Map Location of existing and required traffic control devices Transportation Notes: 1. 4.2-120.A.2--The driveway access to Main Street will require review by ODOT. - ,Please submit copy ofODOT permit application. . 2. 4.2c120.B.--Willfuture access be taken off of the proposed cul-de-sac? ,3. 4.2-120.C.-- The proposed driveway width does not meet the standards per Table 4.2-2. of the Development Code. The minimum 2-way driveway width for a multi- family residential development is 24 feet. Please revise the plans to show the required width. In addition, please show the extent of paving for the driveway and parking area on the plans. ' 4.. Garage Dimensions: Unit #2, #3, and #4 each have one parking space that has a depth of 15' S". This depth may restrict vehicles from using the garage for parking. Given the lack of on-site and on-st,reet parking it is recommended that the required lS' be provided within the garages. 5. The minimum dimension for the two uncovered parallel parking spaces is 9' by 24'. Please revise the plans to show the minimum dimensions for these two spaces. Please note that the spaces must not extend into the required driveway width. 6. Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application: . Revised 10{25{07 Date Received:~,hi.2dO? Planner: AL TENTATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Deputy Fire Marshal: Gilbert Gordon Case #: PRE200S-00041 FIRE o Site Plan Complete' Incomplete See Fire Note(s) ~ On-site vehicular circulation o Improvement and Public Utilities Plan Complete Incomplete See Fire Note(s) ~ Location of existing and required fire hydrants and similar public facilities Fire Notes: 1. Additional-comments not related to the completeness" of the application: 1. The 16 foot wide fire apparatus access road does not meet fire code minimum width of 20 feet. The fire apparatus access road shall have an unobstructed clear width of not' less than 20 feet and and unobstructed vertical clearance of 13 feet 6 inches per 2007 Springfield FireCode 503,2.1. The entire width has to support the 80,000 lb. load required by SFC 503.2.3 and SFC Appendix D102.1. 2. The depth of the turnaround needs to be extended to' 70 feet per SFC Appendix D, Figure D103.1. 3. "No Parking, Fire Lane" signs shall be posted on both Sides of the fire apparatus access road per SFC 503.3 and SFC Appendix D103.6. The spacing shall be guided by the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, 2003 edition,' Section 2Bo41. 4. A fire hydrant is required to serve the proposed project due to the distance from the back of Unit 4 to the existing fire hydra"nt exceeding 600 feet per SFC 50S.5.1, Exception 1. Contact Bart McKee or Rebecca Templin at Springfield Utility Board Water Department at 726-2396. Revised 9{24{07 Date Received: ~/J~/;(}or Planner: AL TENTATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Engineer: Eric Walter Case#: PRE200S-00041 PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING Complete o Site Assessment of Existing Conditions ~ ~ f5<<I ,~. III ~ ~ r;;;;t L!!t- r;;;;t l::ill Revised 1O{25{07 Incomp,lete See PW Note( s) 1 ~ Iilljiil l.llEk! f':Jl ~ III III ~ 2 ~ 3 Prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect or Engineer Vicinity Map. The name, location, and dimensions of all existing site features including buildings, curb cuts, trees and impervious surface areas, clearly indicating what is remaining and what is being removed. For existing structures to remain, also indicate present use, size, setbacks from property lines, and distance between buildings The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and top of bank of all watercourses and required riparian setback that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map on file in the Development Services Department The 100-year floodplain and floodway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment or Letter of Map Revision The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3-200 and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file in the Development Services Department Physical features including, but not limited to trees 5" in diameter or greater when measured 4 Y2 feet above the ground, significant clusters of trees and shrubs, riparian areas, wetlands, and rock outcroppings Soil types and water table information as mapped and specified in the Soils Survey. of Lane County. A Geotechnical Report prepared by an Engineer must be submitted concurrently if the Soils Survey indicates the proposed development area has unstable soils andfor a high water table Dat~ ~eceived:-4~ fON Planner: AL o Improvement and Public Utilities Plan must be in compliance with the regulations of SDC Sections 5.17-100, 4.1-100, 4.2-100, and 4.3-100 and must include the following information: Complete Incomplete, III Iiiiiill, lI!I III III"'" ,,"s . .*_. f':Jl ~. ~ ~ See PW Note(s) 4 5 f':Jl ~ 6 Complete o Grading and Paving Plan ~ III III III Iilljiil E:Efj Iiiiiill ~ III Incomplete See PW Note(s) Ii! . 2, 6 ~ ~ 7 ~ ~ 2,6 ~ 8 ~8 Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer Location and width of all existing and proposed easements Location of existing and required power poles, transformers, neighborhood mailbox units, and similar public facilities Location and size of existing and proposed utilities on and adjacent to the site, including sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas, telephone,. and cable TV. Indicate the proposed connection points Prepared byan Oregon licensed Civil Engineer ,Planting plan prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect where plants are proposed as part of the stormwater management system Roof drainage patterns and discharge locations Pervious and impervious area drainage patterns The size and location of stormwater management systems components, including but not limited to: drain lines,catch basins, dry wells andfor detention ponds; stormwater quality measures; and natural drainageways to be retained Existing and proposed spot elevations and contours lines drawn at 1 foot intervals (for land with a slope over 10 percent, the contour lines may be at 5 foot intervals) Amount of proposed cut and fill ) o Stormwater Management System Study - provide four (4) copies of the study with the completed Storm water Scoping Sheet attached. The plan, calculations, and documentation must be consistent with the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures 'Manual. Complete r;:;:4 ~. Revised 10{25{07 Incomplete See PW Note(s) ? ~ Scoping Sheet and attached Storm water Management System Study Date ~eceived:#Mf Planner: AL PW Notes: 1. . Plan scale submitted is not acceptable due to the complex nature of site and the amount of detail that will be needed. In addition to the overall site assessment plan showing the,entire parcel' and adjacent land, please also provide a full size plan sheet that focuses on the land area being proposed to be developed. Show all detailed . existing site features for this area. ' 2. DSL approval and permits needed for impacts to existing wetland. 3. A soils report is required to be submitted for this application. The soils,report shall address the landslide hazard potential and other critical site specific issues. 4. Please submit a separate plan sheet where the information shown in detaiI2/L1.1 is enlarged on one full size plan sheet. :This will be necessary due to the amount of detail that will need to be shown and for clarity. 5. Show on plans all existing and proposed easements, including the required 7' PUE needed along Main Street. Please submit all copies of recording documents describing each easement. Any proposed easements may be submitted later but will need to be reviewed and approved by City prior to the final plat. 6. Plan scale submitted is not acceptable due to the complex nature of site and the amount of detail that will be needed. Submit a full site plan sheet (boundary simil!lr to detail 2fL1.1) showing all utilities with complete plan detailing for storm water, sanitary, and all other utilities. Plans shall include pipe sizing, ditch details, or any other required details for ensuring storm and,sanitary will comply with SDC and the Springfield Engineering Design Standards Manual. Plans shall include complete retaining wall detailing that includes a complete back-drainage system hard piped to public system. Obtain approval from the Building Department for proposed 4". No additional storm water may enter the existing ditch system as'there are capacity restraints. 7. Roof drains may not be piped to the.wetland unless approved by DSL. 8. Provide full size plan sheet for grading plan showing proposed grades and surface drainage and plans detailed for storm water systems. Provide accurate cut and fill information on final grading plan. Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application: . ODOT approval is required for proposed development including access and utilities connected to Main.Street. . It is public Works understanding that fi're access roads are required to be a minimum of 20' width and will require approval from the Fire Department.. ' Revised 1O{25/07 Date Received: 0 ;/700.{ Planner: AL ANY REQUIRED ADDITIONAL MATERIALS, APPLICATIONS OR PERMITS IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL STANDARDS OR APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE APPLICANT SHOULD CONSIDER UTILIZING. EITHER THE DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING OR THE PRE- APPLICATION REPORT FOR MORE DETAILED INFORMATION: I Applicable Not Applicable ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~III ~ ~ ~ III ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ Revised 10{25{07 Where a multi-family development is proposed, any additional materials to demonstrate compliance with SDC 3.2-240 Riparian Area Protection Report for properties located within 150' feet of the top of bank of any Water Quality Limited Watercourses. (WQLW) or within 100 feet of the top of bank of any direct tributaries of WQLW A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be submitted concurrently if there are unstable soils andfor a high water table present . Where the development area i? within an overlay district, address the additional standards of the overlay district If five or more trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling Permit as specified in SDC 5.19-100 \ A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon Division of State Lands must be submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the property Any required federal or state permit must be submitted concurrently or evidence the permit application has been submitted for review Where any grading, filling or excavating is proposed with the development, a Land and Drainage Alteration permit must be , submitted prior to development Where applicable, any Discretionary Use or Variance as specified in SDC 5.9-100 and 5.21-100 An Annexation application, as specified in SDC 5.7-100, where a development is proposed outside of the city limits but within the City's urban service area and can be serviced by sanitary sewer , , Dat~ Heooived: Planner: AL 6f7ptJ(lJ' . / THIS APPLICATION IS: o COMPLETE FOR PROCESSING ~ INCOMPLETE AND NEEDS MISSING INFORMATION NOTED ABOVE , ~ 1777;.1 t/.tFd&P ~~r,7 ~ This is not a decision on your application. Springfield Development Code Section 504- 105 and Oregon Revised Statutes 227.178 require the City take final action on a limited land use decision within 120 days after the application is deemed complete. The 120~day . processing period for this application begins when all the missing information is submitted or when you request that the City proceed without the information. You must indicate by either signing this form or by submitting a written response to the City within seven days of the date of this form asserting your intentions regarding the provision of the missing information. If you indicate herein or in your written response that the missing information will be submitted, then you have 180 days from the date the application was submitted for Pre- Submittal Review to provide the City with the missing information. If you refuse to submit the missing information, then upon receipt of the full application packet and processing fee, the City will deem the appljcation complete for purposes of starting the 120-day clock and begin processing the application. No neW information may be submitted after the start of ' the 120-day period unless accompanied by a request for an extension of the 120-day processing time. Upon receipt of a request for extension, the City may extend the 120-day period for a reasonable period of time. The City may also require additional fees if the new. information is submitted after the Notification to Surrounding Property Owners is sent out and a second notification is required or if the new information substantially affects the application proposal and additional review is required. I, the owner/applicant, intend to submit all missing items indicated herein to the City within the ISO-day timeline. dttM'fJif<<tJIJ ?I n/o'3 Ownerf Applicant's Signature Date Revised 10{25{07 Dat~ f{aceived: h /:? 7/;2coL Planner: AL / /