HomeMy WebLinkAboutNotes, Work PLANNER 6/27/2008
. '
City of Springfield
Development Services Department
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
SITE PLAN REVIEW
PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
Project Name: Alford Don Ward / ADW LLC Duplex Site Plan
Project Proposal: Construct an attached single family dwelling and two detached single
family dwellings, in two phases, on a vacant residential lot.
Case Number: PRE2008-00041
Project Address: 6421 & 6423 Main Street
Assessors. Map and Tax Lot Number(s): 17-02-34-43, TL 403
Zoning: Medium Density. Residential (MDR)
Overlay District(s): Hillside Development (HD)
Applicable Refinement Plan: .
Refinement Plan Designation:
,
Metro Plan Designation: Medium Density Residential (MDR)
Pre-Submittal Meeting Date: June 27, 2008
Application Submittal Deadline: December 24, 2008
Associated Applications: 2001-10-216; 2001-10-217; SUB2005-00066; ZON2005-00043
F:~~~~~eRiN.G~IEl!l>lI>ESlEl!oe:~~~~E%:'EWMtll~~iill-~~~~1
I Proiect Planner Land Use Planninq Andy Limbird 726-3784
I Transportation Planninq Enqineer Transportation Jon Driscoll 726-3679
I Public Works Civil EnQineer Utilities Eric Walter 736-1034
I Public Works .Civil EnQineer Sanitarv & Storm Sewer Eric Walter 736-1034
, Deputy Fire Marshal Fire and Life Safety Gilbert Gordon 726-2293
I Community Services Manaqer Buildinq Dave Puent 726-3668,
'rAeRl!(e~NiT'SII>ESlEl!OI!MENiI"o'IRE~.E:Wo'lil"E~MIr~iI!J!iI.liarJ..L IIaLErJEIiI!J!i!lIf1 .
Applicant 'Owner Engineer
Alford Don Ward Matthew Alan Sloan LLC Stephen Keating
ADW, LLC 1574 Coburg Rd. #880 Keating Engineering LLC
1574 Coburg Rd. #880 Eugene, OR 97401 159 East 16th Avenue
EUQene,OR 97401 EUQene,OR 97401
Revised 10{25{07
Date Received' 6/n /.;700(
Planner: AL I I
'f
TENTATIVE SITE PLAN ,REVIEW APPLICATION
PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
PLANNING
o Application fee - discuss the applicable fees
,0 Copy of the Site Plan reduced to 8'h"x 11"
Complete, Incomplete See Planning
Note(s)
1
o Copy of the deed and a preliminary title report issued within the past 30 days
documenting ownership and listing all encumbrances. If the applicant is not the property
owner, written permission from the property owner is required.
Complete Incomplete See Planning
Note(s)
2
o Brief narrative explaining the purpose of the development, the existing use of the
property, and any additional information that may have a bearing in determining the
action to be taken. The narrative should also include the proposed number of employees
and future expansion plans, if known.
Complete Incomplete See Planning
Note(s)
See Note
1iiii$I....
I!:'iliJ
~
~
Iiiii$I
W'
r;;:;?,I
IZ!SJ
Iiiii$I
~
o Site Plan
Complete Incomplete See Planning
Note(s)
~.
~ ~. See Note
~ ~
f5<<I
~
Iiiii$I
~
See Note
~ ~
Revised 1O{25{07
8 V2' X ll",Copy of Site Plan
Deed and Preliminary Title Report
Brief Narrative
Prepared by an Oregon Licensed Architect,
Landscape Architect, or Engineer
'. Proposed buildings: location, dimensions,
size (gross floor area applicable to the
parking requirement for the proposed
use(s)), setbacks from property lines, and
distance between buildings
Location and height of existing or proposed
fences, walls, outdoor equipment, storage,
trash receptacles, and signs
Location, dimensions, and number of typical,
compact, and disabled parking spaces;
including aisles, wheel bumpers, directional
signs, and striping
Dimensions of the development area, as well
as area and percentage of the site proposed
for buildings, structures, parking and
Date Received:~/.z"O!
Planner: AL
~
~
3
vehicular areas, sidewalks, patios, and other
impervious surfaces
Observance of solar access requirements as
specified in the applicable zoning district
On-site loading areas and vehicular and
, pedestrian circulation
Location, type, and number of bicycle
parking spaces
Area and dimensions of all property to be
conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for
common open spaces, recreational areas,
and other similar public and semi-public uses
Location of existing and proposed transit
facilities
~
NfA
f':Jl
~
~
~
NfA
Iilljiil
lEi
~
~
o Phased Development Plan Where applicable, the Site Plan application must inclu'de a
phasing plan indicating any proposed phases for development, including the boundaries
and sequencing of each phase. Phasing must progress in a sequence promoting street
connectivity between the various phases of the development and accommodating other
. required public improvements, including but not limited to, sanitary sewer, stormwater
management, water, and electricity. The applicant must indicate which phases apply to
the Site Plan application being submitted.
Complete Incomplete See Planning
Note(s)
See Note
I'fi:1I
~
~
Phased Development Plan'
o Landscape Plan
Complete Incomplete
III ~
~ ~
See Planning
Note(s)
.4
5
~
,~ ~
6
Drawn by a Landscape Architect
Location and dimensions of landscaping and
open space areas to include calculation of
landscape coverage
Screening in accordance with SDC 4.4-110
Written description, 'including specifications, of
'the permanent irrigation system
Location and type of street trees
List in chart form the proposed types of
landscape materials (trees, shrubs, ground
cover). Includ~ in the chart genus, species,
common name, quantity, size, spacing and
method of planting
~ ~
~ ~
NfA
7
o Architectural Plan
Complete Incomplete See Planning
Note(s)
~
Revised 10{25{07
Exterior elevations of all buildings and
Date Received: 6/n~!
Planner: AL . I
~
~.
structures proposed for the development site,
including height
Conceptual floor plans
o On-Site Lighting Plan
Complete Incomplete See Planning
, Note(s)
III ~ 8
~
~
10
Location, orientation, and maximum height of
exterior light fixtures, both free standing and
attached
Type and extent of shielding, including cut-off
angles and type of illumination, wattage, and
luminous area
Photometric test report for each light source
~
r;;:;?,I,', ,
~
9
Planning Notes:
1. Provide an 8Y2x11 size copy of the site plan with'the submittal.
2. Provide a current title report with the submittal. The Lien and Encumbrance report is
not sufficient for purposes of the application, and is not intended as a title report as ,
stated on Page 3. ,
3. Provide confirmation the proposed dwellings meet solar access requirements of the
Development Code.
4. A Site Landscaping Plan ,prepared by a Landscape Architect will be required.
5. Site Landscaping Plan shall provide a tabulation of the total area attributed to
landscaping.
6. A description of the site irrigation system shall be provided with the landscaping plan.
7. The Site Landscaping Plan shall provide the quantities and species of plants proposed
for the development site.
8. A site lighting plan that shows the location of proposed outside fixtl!res will be
required.
9. Provide cut sheets for the proposed outdoor light fixtures to be used on the site.
10.Photometric test information shall be provided for the proposed light fixtures.
Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application:
. Project narrative does not discuss measures to incorporate Hillside Development
Overlay standards, tree felling, wetland protection, or other details of the project
including the proposed access scheme.
. The development site does not have frontage on a developed public street and
therefore will be classified as a panhandle parcel for the purpose of review.
. The Site Assessment Plan is not accurate, as there are now two separate properties
comprising former Tax Lot 402 (see recorded Partition Plat 2006-P2034). A
concurrence will be recjuired from the owners of (now) Tax Lots 404 and 405
agreeing to the proposed improvements as depicted on the site plan. Alternatively,
the owners of TL 404 and 405 can be co-applicants.
. The existing driveway functions as a multi-family driveway due to the existing and
proposed number of units deriving access from one point. Therefore, the curb cut
and driveway throat shall be increased to at least 24 feet wide in accordance with
Table 4.2-2 of the Springfield Development Code.
. ,An ODOT aq:ess permit may be required due to the number of units proposed to
Revised 10{25{07
Date Received: ~h;l;J.OOO
Planner: AL
access the existing driveway, which was originally intended as a temporary access.
. The entire driveway length will need to be paved at least 18 feet wide with 20 feet of
clear width to meet requirements of the Springfield Development Code and Fire Code.
. The proposed Fire Department turnaround does not meet minimum Fire Code
dimensions for hammerhead depth, and also encroaches within the public wetland
buffer area. Relocation of the turnaround and use of an acceptable Fire Department
hammerhead template will be required.
. The two proposed parallel parking spaces do not rT:1eet the required dimensions of
SDC Table 4.6-1 (must be at least 24 feet long by 9 feet wide for standard parking
spaces). Addi~ionally, these are shown within a public access and maintenance
easement:
. Provide a clear delineation of Phase 1 versus Phase 2 site work: What will be the
interim status of the Phase 2 area following initial site grading and construction of
Phase 1 (ie. landscaped?). Phase 2 development is conditional upon completion of an
alternate access to a public street: in accordance with SDC 3.2-220.A.4, no more
than 8 dwelling units can take access from a panhandle driveway (there are currently
6 units taking access from the single driveway).
. The minimum setback from property line for Unit 4 should be increased to at least 10
feet to meet requirements of SDC 3.2-215. The ,east property line constitutes the
rear yard due to the building and driveway orientation under panhandle parcel
development standards.
. A complete Hillside Development Overlay District application will be required
concurrently with the Site Plan Review submittal, including a Geotechnical Report.
o A concurrent Tree Felling Permit will be required for this development proposal if
more than 5 trees greater than 5" diameter are proposed for removal.
. The Site Assessrnent Plan must be updated as it does not depict a large oak tree near
the southwest corner of proposed Unit 4 (this is shown as a small maple on the site
plan). During a recent site visit, there were no maple trees observed ,in the locations
where maples are indicated 'on the site assessment plan (trees are primarily cherry,
ash, oak and other varieties).
. Provide details on the housing style, which does not appear to be two duplexes (more
like four single family dwellings). The City's Building Division advises there are
special Building Code requirements for the dwelling unit styles as proposed.
. Provide the recording num~er(s),for all existing easements benefiting the
development site (including the joint access and maintenance easement, the access
easement and public wetland buffer, and existing 7-foot Public Utility Easement).
o Show the location and dimensions of the existing sanitary sewer stub, existing
stormwater lines, and stormwater culverts running beneath the gravel driveway.
. A detailed storm water plan'sheet will be required with the submittal.
. The submitted plans are too small for legibility. Larger plans (minimum 24"x36") with
a zoom-in detail on the Units 1-4 area will be required for submittal.
. The proposed interconnection of all four units to a single sanitary sewer line,willlikely
preclude future separation of ownership for the four units.
. Public Works stormwater management guidelines will ~equire pretreatment before
discharging stormwater runoff to an acceptable public system (ie. not the wetland).
. Wetland protective fencing shall be re-installed where necessary and the large steel
culvert pipe shalf be removed from the jurisdictional wetland area. '
o Correct typos on the plan sheets and the vicinity map (there are no numbered
Avenues in Springfield). .
o Provide copies of all easement documents recorded against the property.
Revised 10{25{07
Dat"d~eceived' 6/n0utJ t
Planner: AL ! ~
i"
(
lAND DIVISION TENTATIVE PLAN APPLICATION
, '
PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
Transportation Engineer !Planner: Judy Johnduff Case#: PRE2008-00041
Applicant: Alford Don Ward, Duples at 6421 Main Street
TRANSPORTATION
o
Right-of-Way Approach Permit application must be provided where the property has
frontage on a'Lane County or an Oregon Department of Transportation .(ODOT) facility. .
Complete Incomplete
Iiiii$I
~
~
See Transportation
Note(s)
See Note.#1
Copy of ROW Approach Permit Application
o Traff.ic Impact Study ~ four (4) copies of a study prepared by a Traffic Engineer in
accordance with SDC 4.2-105 Ao4. Traffic Impact Studies (TIS) allow the City to analyze
and evaluate the traffic impacts and mitigation of a development on the City's
transportation system. In general, a TIS must explain how the traffic'from a given
development affects the transportation system in terms of safety, traffic operations,
<jccess and mobility, and immediate and adjoining street systems. A TIS must also
address, if needed, City, Metro Plan and state land use and transportation policies and
objectives.
Complete Incomplete
See Transportation
Note(s)
NjA
Traffic Impact Study
~ ~
o Land Division Tentative Plan
Complete Incomplete
See Transportation
Note(s)
NjA
Location of existing and proposed street'
lighting, including type, height, and area
of illumination,
Location of existing and proposed transit.
, facilities
Location and dimensions of existing and
proposed driveways
Location and width of all existing and
proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps,
pedestrian access ways, and bike trails
Location, widths, conditions, and names of
all existing and proposed streets, alleys,
dedications or other right-of-ways within
or adjacent to the proposed land division.
Proposed streets should also include
approximate radius of curves and grades
and relationship to any projected streets
Date Received: "'f;ff}()J
Planner: AL
~ ~
~
151, ",
El
NfA
I1il
~
J>3?I
~
See Note #2
~
I1il
U?2J
NfA
~
~
Revised 10{25{07
,>
f':Jl
l22SJ
~
N/A
as shown on the Metro Plan, TransPlan,
Conceptual Development Plan, or
Conceptual Local Street Map
Location of existing and required traffic
control devices
Transportation Notes:
1. 4.2-120.A.2--The driveway access to Main Street will require review by ODOT.
- ,Please submit copy ofODOT permit application. .
2. 4.2c120.B.--Willfuture access be taken off of the proposed cul-de-sac?
,3. 4.2-120.C.-- The proposed driveway width does not meet the standards per Table
4.2-2. of the Development Code. The minimum 2-way driveway width for a multi-
family residential development is 24 feet. Please revise the plans to show the
required width. In addition, please show the extent of paving for the driveway
and parking area on the plans. '
4.. Garage Dimensions: Unit #2, #3, and #4 each have one parking space that has a
depth of 15' S". This depth may restrict vehicles from using the garage for
parking. Given the lack of on-site and on-st,reet parking it is recommended that
the required lS' be provided within the garages.
5. The minimum dimension for the two uncovered parallel parking spaces is 9' by 24'.
Please revise the plans to show the minimum dimensions for these two spaces.
Please note that the spaces must not extend into the required driveway width.
6.
Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application:
.
Revised 10{25{07
Date Received:~,hi.2dO?
Planner: AL
TENTATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION
PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
Deputy Fire Marshal: Gilbert Gordon
Case #: PRE200S-00041
FIRE
o Site Plan
Complete' Incomplete See Fire
Note(s)
~
On-site vehicular circulation
o Improvement and Public Utilities Plan
Complete Incomplete See Fire
Note(s)
~
Location of existing and required fire hydrants and
similar public facilities
Fire Notes:
1.
Additional-comments not related to the completeness" of the application:
1. The 16 foot wide fire apparatus access road does not meet fire code minimum width
of 20 feet. The fire apparatus access road shall have an unobstructed clear width of not'
less than 20 feet and and unobstructed vertical clearance of 13 feet 6 inches per 2007
Springfield FireCode 503,2.1. The entire width has to support the 80,000 lb. load
required by SFC 503.2.3 and SFC Appendix D102.1.
2. The depth of the turnaround needs to be extended to' 70 feet per SFC Appendix D,
Figure D103.1.
3. "No Parking, Fire Lane" signs shall be posted on both Sides of the fire apparatus
access road per SFC 503.3 and SFC Appendix D103.6. The spacing shall be guided by
the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, 2003 edition,' Section 2Bo41.
4. A fire hydrant is required to serve the proposed project due to the distance from the
back of Unit 4 to the existing fire hydra"nt exceeding 600 feet per SFC 50S.5.1, Exception
1. Contact Bart McKee or Rebecca Templin at Springfield Utility Board Water Department
at 726-2396.
Revised 9{24{07
Date Received: ~/J~/;(}or
Planner: AL
TENTATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION
PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
Engineer: Eric Walter Case#: PRE200S-00041
PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING
Complete
o Site Assessment of Existing Conditions
~
~
f5<<I
,~.
III
~
~
r;;;;t
L!!t-
r;;;;t
l::ill
Revised 1O{25{07
Incomp,lete See PW
Note( s)
1
~
Iilljiil
l.llEk!
f':Jl
~
III
III
~
2
~
3
Prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect
or Engineer
Vicinity Map.
The name, location, and dimensions of all existing site
features including buildings, curb cuts, trees and
impervious surface areas, clearly indicating what is
remaining and what is being removed. For existing
structures to remain, also indicate present use, size,
setbacks from property lines, and distance between
buildings
The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and
top of bank of all watercourses and required riparian
setback that are shown on the Water Quality Limited
Watercourse Map on file in the Development Services
Department
The 100-year floodplain and floodway boundaries on
the site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood
Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map
Amendment or Letter of Map Revision
The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3-200
and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map
on file in the Development Services Department
Physical features including, but not limited to trees 5"
in diameter or greater when measured 4 Y2 feet above
the ground, significant clusters of trees and shrubs,
riparian areas, wetlands, and rock outcroppings
Soil types and water table information as mapped and
specified in the Soils Survey. of Lane County. A
Geotechnical Report prepared by an Engineer must be
submitted concurrently if the Soils Survey indicates
the proposed development area has unstable soils
andfor a high water table
Dat~ ~eceived:-4~ fON
Planner: AL
o Improvement and Public Utilities Plan must be in compliance with the regulations of
SDC Sections 5.17-100, 4.1-100, 4.2-100, and 4.3-100 and must include the following
information:
Complete Incomplete,
III
Iiiiiill,
lI!I
III
III"'"
,,"s
. .*_.
f':Jl
~.
~
~
See PW
Note(s)
4
5
f':Jl
~
6
Complete
o Grading and Paving Plan
~
III
III
III
Iilljiil
E:Efj
Iiiiiill
~
III
Incomplete See PW
Note(s)
Ii! . 2, 6
~
~ 7
~
~ 2,6
~ 8
~8
Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer
Location and width of all existing and proposed
easements
Location of existing and required power poles,
transformers, neighborhood mailbox units, and similar
public facilities
Location and size of existing and proposed utilities on
and adjacent to the site, including sanitary sewer
mains, stormwater management systems, water
mains, power, gas, telephone,. and cable TV.
Indicate the proposed connection points
Prepared byan Oregon licensed Civil Engineer
,Planting plan prepared by an Oregon licensed
Landscape Architect where plants are proposed as
part of the stormwater management system
Roof drainage patterns and discharge locations
Pervious and impervious area drainage patterns
The size and location of stormwater management
systems components, including but not limited to:
drain lines,catch basins, dry wells andfor detention
ponds; stormwater quality measures; and natural
drainageways to be retained
Existing and proposed spot elevations and contours
lines drawn at 1 foot intervals (for land with a slope
over 10 percent, the contour lines may be at 5 foot
intervals)
Amount of proposed cut and fill
)
o Stormwater Management System Study - provide four (4) copies of the study with
the completed Storm water Scoping Sheet attached. The plan, calculations, and
documentation must be consistent with the Engineering Design Standards and
Procedures 'Manual.
Complete
r;:;:4
~.
Revised 10{25{07
Incomplete
See PW
Note(s)
?
~
Scoping Sheet and attached Storm water Management
System Study
Date ~eceived:#Mf
Planner: AL
PW Notes:
1. . Plan scale submitted is not acceptable due to the complex nature of site and the
amount of detail that will be needed. In addition to the overall site assessment plan
showing the,entire parcel' and adjacent land, please also provide a full size plan sheet
that focuses on the land area being proposed to be developed. Show all detailed .
existing site features for this area. '
2. DSL approval and permits needed for impacts to existing wetland.
3. A soils report is required to be submitted for this application. The soils,report shall
address the landslide hazard potential and other critical site specific issues.
4. Please submit a separate plan sheet where the information shown in detaiI2/L1.1 is
enlarged on one full size plan sheet. :This will be necessary due to the amount of
detail that will need to be shown and for clarity.
5. Show on plans all existing and proposed easements, including the required 7' PUE
needed along Main Street. Please submit all copies of recording documents
describing each easement. Any proposed easements may be submitted later but will
need to be reviewed and approved by City prior to the final plat.
6. Plan scale submitted is not acceptable due to the complex nature of site and the
amount of detail that will be needed. Submit a full site plan sheet (boundary simil!lr
to detail 2fL1.1) showing all utilities with complete plan detailing for storm water,
sanitary, and all other utilities. Plans shall include pipe sizing, ditch details, or any
other required details for ensuring storm and,sanitary will comply with SDC and the
Springfield Engineering Design Standards Manual. Plans shall include complete
retaining wall detailing that includes a complete back-drainage system hard piped to
public system. Obtain approval from the Building Department for proposed 4". No
additional storm water may enter the existing ditch system as'there are capacity
restraints.
7. Roof drains may not be piped to the.wetland unless approved by DSL.
8. Provide full size plan sheet for grading plan showing proposed grades and surface
drainage and plans detailed for storm water systems. Provide accurate cut and fill
information on final grading plan.
Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application:
. ODOT approval is required for proposed development including access and utilities
connected to Main.Street.
. It is public Works understanding that fi're access roads are required to be a minimum
of 20' width and will require approval from the Fire Department.. '
Revised 1O{25/07
Date Received: 0 ;/700.{
Planner: AL
ANY REQUIRED ADDITIONAL MATERIALS, APPLICATIONS OR
PERMITS
IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL STANDARDS OR
APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE APPLICANT SHOULD
CONSIDER UTILIZING. EITHER THE DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING OR THE PRE-
APPLICATION REPORT FOR MORE DETAILED INFORMATION:
I
Applicable Not
Applicable
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
~III
~ ~
~ III
~ ~
~
~ ~
~ '~
Revised 10{25{07
Where a multi-family development is proposed, any additional
materials to demonstrate compliance with SDC 3.2-240
Riparian Area Protection Report for properties located within 150'
feet of the top of bank of any Water Quality Limited Watercourses.
(WQLW) or within 100 feet of the top of bank of any direct
tributaries of WQLW
A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be submitted
concurrently if there are unstable soils andfor a high water table
present .
Where the development area i? within an overlay district, address
the additional standards of the overlay district
If five or more trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling
Permit as specified in SDC 5.19-100
\
A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon Division of State
Lands must be submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on
the property
Any required federal or state permit must be submitted
concurrently or evidence the permit application has been submitted
for review
Where any grading, filling or excavating is proposed with the
development, a Land and Drainage Alteration permit must be
, submitted prior to development
Where applicable, any Discretionary Use or Variance as specified in
SDC 5.9-100 and 5.21-100
An Annexation application, as specified in SDC 5.7-100, where a
development is proposed outside of the city limits but within the
City's urban service area and can be serviced by sanitary sewer
, ,
Dat~ Heooived:
Planner: AL
6f7ptJ(lJ'
. /
THIS APPLICATION IS:
o COMPLETE FOR PROCESSING
~ INCOMPLETE AND NEEDS MISSING INFORMATION NOTED ABOVE
,
~ 1777;.1 t/.tFd&P
~~r,7 ~
This is not a decision on your application. Springfield Development Code Section 504-
105 and Oregon Revised Statutes 227.178 require the City take final action on a limited land
use decision within 120 days after the application is deemed complete. The 120~day
. processing period for this application begins when all the missing information is submitted or
when you request that the City proceed without the information. You must indicate by either
signing this form or by submitting a written response to the City within seven days of the
date of this form asserting your intentions regarding the provision of the missing information.
If you indicate herein or in your written response that the missing information will be
submitted, then you have 180 days from the date the application was submitted for Pre-
Submittal Review to provide the City with the missing information. If you refuse to submit
the missing information, then upon receipt of the full application packet and processing fee,
the City will deem the appljcation complete for purposes of starting the 120-day clock and
begin processing the application. No neW information may be submitted after the start of '
the 120-day period unless accompanied by a request for an extension of the 120-day
processing time. Upon receipt of a request for extension, the City may extend the 120-day
period for a reasonable period of time. The City may also require additional fees if the new.
information is submitted after the Notification to Surrounding Property Owners is sent out
and a second notification is required or if the new information substantially affects the
application proposal and additional review is required.
I, the owner/applicant, intend to submit all missing items indicated herein to the
City within the ISO-day timeline.
dttM'fJif<<tJIJ ?I n/o'3
Ownerf Applicant's Signature
Date
Revised 10{25{07
Dat~ f{aceived: h /:? 7/;2coL
Planner: AL / /