HomeMy WebLinkAboutComments PWE 6/26/2008
Page 1 of 1
L1MBIRD Andrew
From: WALTER Eric
Sent: Thursday, June 26,2008 11 :37 AM
To: L1MBIRD Andrew
Subject: RE: PRE200B-00041 Ward Duplex Site Plan
Andy,
Actually, what Planning will be requiring for the minimum Hillside Development application will be acceptable for
the Public Works review. I just wanted to ensure this important item did not go off our radar. I must add that I
have a bad habit of calling geotechnical reports soils report but I meant to say geotechnical report:). 'can see
my past Building Department work in Napa is coming back to haunt me as they have a tendency to call them soils
reports over there. With all this said, we can let Planning take the lead on this requirement since it is part of the
application for a Hillside submittal requirement. Thanks Andy.
From: UMBIRD Andrew
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 11:27 AM
To: WALTER Eric
Subject: RE: PRE2008-00041 Ward Duplex Site Plan
Thanks Eric. Do we want to be more specific about requiring an actual. Geotechnical Report instead of a soils
report? If so, I can make the comment in the Planning notes.
From: WALTER Eric
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 11:06 AM
To: UMBlRD Andrew
Subject: PRE2008-00041 Ward Duplex Site Plan
Andy,
Please find attached the Public Works comments for the Ward Duplex Site Plan. Please let me know if you have
any questions prior to our meeting tomorrow.
Thanks,
Eric
Eric A. Walter, P.E.
Civil Engineer
City of Springfield
Public Works Department
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
Telephone: (541) 736-1034
Facsimile:. (541) 736-1021
Email: ewalter@ci.sRringfield.or.us
Web: . www.ci.sorinafield.or.us
6/26/2008
Date Received"
Planner: AL
bjJ6~od
I
. .
TENTATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION
PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
Engineer: Eric Walter Case#.: PRE2008-00041
PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING
o Site Assessment of Existing Conditions
Complete
~
~
~
~.
~
~
r;;::)
I!!!I
~
Revised 10/25/07
Incomplete
See PW
Note(s)
1
~
filii
l=r
filii
w
~
~
filii
l.EB:1
~
2
~
3
Prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect
or Engineer .
Vicinity Map
The name, location, and dimensions of all existing site
features including buildings,curb cuts, trees and
impervious surface areas, clearly indicating what is .
remaining and what is being removed. For existing
structures to remain; also indicate present use, size,
setbacks from property lines, and distance between
buildings
The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and
top of bank of all watercourses and required riparian
setback that are shown on the Water Quality Limited
Watercourse Map on file in the Development Services
Department
The 100-year floodplain and f100dway boundaries on
the site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood
Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map
Amendment or Letter of Map Revision
The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3-200
and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map
on file in the Development Services Department
Physical features including, but not limited to trees 5"
in diameter or greater when measured 4 Vz feet above
the ground, significant clusters of trees and shrubs,
riparian areas, wetlands, and rock outcroppings
Soil types and water table information as mapped and
specified in the Soils Survey of Lane County. A
Geotechnical Report prepared by an Engineer must be
. submitted concurrently if the Soils Survey indicates
the proposed development area has unstable soils
and/or a high water table
Date Received:~PtJoo"
Planner: AL
o Improvement and Public Utilities Plan must be in compliance with the regulations of
SDC Sections 5.17-100, 4.1-100, 4.2-100, and 4.3-100 and must include the following
information:
Complete Incomplete
~ ~
~ ~
1jI
~
~
~
See PW
Note(s)
4
5
6
Complete . Incomplete
o Grading and Paving Plan
~.
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~.
~d%
.>'~ .
~~,.
~
~
[g]
See PW
Note(s)
2,6
7
2,6
8
8
Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer
Location and width of all existing and proposed
easements
Location of existing and required power poles,
transformers, neighborhood mailbox units, and similar
public facilities
Location and size of existing and proposed utilities on
and adjacent to the site, including sanitary sewer
mains, stormwater management systems, water
mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV.
Indicate the proposed connection points
Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer
Planting plan prepared by an Oregon licensed
Landscape Architect where plants are proposed as
part of the stormwater management system
Roof drainage patterns and discharge locations
Pervious and impervious area drainage patterns
The size and location of stormwater management
systems components, including but not limited to:
d~ain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention
ponds; stormwater quality measures; and natural
drainageways to be retained
Existing and proposed spot elevations and contours
lines drawn at 1 foot intervals (for land with a'slope .
over 10'percent, the contour lines may be at 5 foot
intervals) .
Amount of proposed cut and fill
o Stormwater Ma'nagement System Study - provide four (4) copies of the study with.
the completed Storm water Scoping Sheet attached. The plan, calculations, and
documentation must be consistent with the Engineering Design Standards and
'Procedures Manual.
Complete
Incomplete
~
~
[j1
Revised 10/25/07
See PW
Note(s)
.2
Scoping Sheet and attached Stormwater Management
System Study
Date Received:~,ht?Od'
Planner: AL
PW Notes:
1. Plan scale submitted is not acceptable due to the complex nature of site and the
amount of detail that will be needed. Iri addition to the overall site assessment plan'
showing the entire parcel and adjacent land, please also provide a full size plan sheet
that focuses on the land area being proposed to, be developed. Show all detailed
existing site features for this area.
2. DSL approval and permits needed for impacts to existing wetland.
3. A soils report is required to be submitted for this application. The soils report shall
address the landslide hazard potential and other critical site specific issues.
4. Please submit a separate plan sheet where the information shown in detail 2/L1.1 is
enlarged on one full size plan sheet. This will be necessary due to the amount of
detail that will need to be shown and for clarity.
5. Show on plans all existing and proposed easements, including the required 7' PUE
needed along Main Street. Please submit all copies of recording documents
describing each easement. Any proposed easements may be submitted later but will
need to be reviewed and approved by City prior to the final plat.
6. Plan scale submitted is not acceptable due to the complex nature of site and the
amount of detail that will be needed. Submit a full site'plan sheet (boundary similar
to detail 2/L1.1) showing all utilities with complete plan detailing for storm water,
\
sanitary, and all other utilities. Plans shall include pipe sizing, ditch details, or any
other required details for. ensuring storm and sanitary will comply with SDC and the
Springfield Engineering Design Standards Manual. Plans shall include complete
retaining wall detailing that includes a complete back-drainage system hard piped to
public system. Obtain approval from the Building Department forproposed 4". No
additional storm water may enter the existing ditch system as there are capacity
restra i nts.
7.. Roof drains may not be piped to the wetla'nd unless approv~d by DSL.
8. Provide full size plan sheet for grading plan showing proposed grades and surface
drainage and plans detailed for storm water systems. Provide accurate cut and .fill
information on final grading plan.
Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application:
. ODOT approval is required for proposed development including access and utilities
connected to Main Street. .
. It is Public Worksunderstandin9 that fire access roads are required to be a minimum
of 20' width and will require approval from the Fire Department.
Revised 10/25/07
DatE> t,eceived: 6/~hotJrf
Planner: AL