The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutComments PWE 6/26/2008 Page 1 of 1 L1MBIRD Andrew From: WALTER Eric Sent: Thursday, June 26,2008 11 :37 AM To: L1MBIRD Andrew Subject: RE: PRE200B-00041 Ward Duplex Site Plan Andy, Actually, what Planning will be requiring for the minimum Hillside Development application will be acceptable for the Public Works review. I just wanted to ensure this important item did not go off our radar. I must add that I have a bad habit of calling geotechnical reports soils report but I meant to say geotechnical report:). 'can see my past Building Department work in Napa is coming back to haunt me as they have a tendency to call them soils reports over there. With all this said, we can let Planning take the lead on this requirement since it is part of the application for a Hillside submittal requirement. Thanks Andy. From: UMBIRD Andrew Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 11:27 AM To: WALTER Eric Subject: RE: PRE2008-00041 Ward Duplex Site Plan Thanks Eric. Do we want to be more specific about requiring an actual. Geotechnical Report instead of a soils report? If so, I can make the comment in the Planning notes. From: WALTER Eric Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 11:06 AM To: UMBlRD Andrew Subject: PRE2008-00041 Ward Duplex Site Plan Andy, Please find attached the Public Works comments for the Ward Duplex Site Plan. Please let me know if you have any questions prior to our meeting tomorrow. Thanks, Eric Eric A. Walter, P.E. Civil Engineer City of Springfield Public Works Department 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Telephone: (541) 736-1034 Facsimile:. (541) 736-1021 Email: ewalter@ci.sRringfield.or.us Web: . www.ci.sorinafield.or.us 6/26/2008 Date Received" Planner: AL bjJ6~od I . . TENTATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Engineer: Eric Walter Case#.: PRE2008-00041 PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING o Site Assessment of Existing Conditions Complete ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ r;;::) I!!!I ~ Revised 10/25/07 Incomplete See PW Note(s) 1 ~ filii l=r filii w ~ ~ filii l.EB:1 ~ 2 ~ 3 Prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect or Engineer . Vicinity Map The name, location, and dimensions of all existing site features including buildings,curb cuts, trees and impervious surface areas, clearly indicating what is . remaining and what is being removed. For existing structures to remain; also indicate present use, size, setbacks from property lines, and distance between buildings The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and top of bank of all watercourses and required riparian setback that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map on file in the Development Services Department The 100-year floodplain and f100dway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment or Letter of Map Revision The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3-200 and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file in the Development Services Department Physical features including, but not limited to trees 5" in diameter or greater when measured 4 Vz feet above the ground, significant clusters of trees and shrubs, riparian areas, wetlands, and rock outcroppings Soil types and water table information as mapped and specified in the Soils Survey of Lane County. A Geotechnical Report prepared by an Engineer must be . submitted concurrently if the Soils Survey indicates the proposed development area has unstable soils and/or a high water table Date Received:~PtJoo" Planner: AL o Improvement and Public Utilities Plan must be in compliance with the regulations of SDC Sections 5.17-100, 4.1-100, 4.2-100, and 4.3-100 and must include the following information: Complete Incomplete ~ ~ ~ ~ 1jI ~ ~ ~ See PW Note(s) 4 5 6 Complete . Incomplete o Grading and Paving Plan ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~d% .>'~ . ~~,. ~ ~ [g] See PW Note(s) 2,6 7 2,6 8 8 Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer Location and width of all existing and proposed easements Location of existing and required power poles, transformers, neighborhood mailbox units, and similar public facilities Location and size of existing and proposed utilities on and adjacent to the site, including sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV. Indicate the proposed connection points Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer Planting plan prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect where plants are proposed as part of the stormwater management system Roof drainage patterns and discharge locations Pervious and impervious area drainage patterns The size and location of stormwater management systems components, including but not limited to: d~ain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention ponds; stormwater quality measures; and natural drainageways to be retained Existing and proposed spot elevations and contours lines drawn at 1 foot intervals (for land with a'slope . over 10'percent, the contour lines may be at 5 foot intervals) . Amount of proposed cut and fill o Stormwater Ma'nagement System Study - provide four (4) copies of the study with. the completed Storm water Scoping Sheet attached. The plan, calculations, and documentation must be consistent with the Engineering Design Standards and 'Procedures Manual. Complete Incomplete ~ ~ [j1 Revised 10/25/07 See PW Note(s) .2 Scoping Sheet and attached Stormwater Management System Study Date Received:~,ht?Od' Planner: AL PW Notes: 1. Plan scale submitted is not acceptable due to the complex nature of site and the amount of detail that will be needed. Iri addition to the overall site assessment plan' showing the entire parcel and adjacent land, please also provide a full size plan sheet that focuses on the land area being proposed to, be developed. Show all detailed existing site features for this area. 2. DSL approval and permits needed for impacts to existing wetland. 3. A soils report is required to be submitted for this application. The soils report shall address the landslide hazard potential and other critical site specific issues. 4. Please submit a separate plan sheet where the information shown in detail 2/L1.1 is enlarged on one full size plan sheet. This will be necessary due to the amount of detail that will need to be shown and for clarity. 5. Show on plans all existing and proposed easements, including the required 7' PUE needed along Main Street. Please submit all copies of recording documents describing each easement. Any proposed easements may be submitted later but will need to be reviewed and approved by City prior to the final plat. 6. Plan scale submitted is not acceptable due to the complex nature of site and the amount of detail that will be needed. Submit a full site'plan sheet (boundary similar to detail 2/L1.1) showing all utilities with complete plan detailing for storm water, \ sanitary, and all other utilities. Plans shall include pipe sizing, ditch details, or any other required details for. ensuring storm and sanitary will comply with SDC and the Springfield Engineering Design Standards Manual. Plans shall include complete retaining wall detailing that includes a complete back-drainage system hard piped to public system. Obtain approval from the Building Department forproposed 4". No additional storm water may enter the existing ditch system as there are capacity restra i nts. 7.. Roof drains may not be piped to the wetla'nd unless approv~d by DSL. 8. Provide full size plan sheet for grading plan showing proposed grades and surface drainage and plans detailed for storm water systems. Provide accurate cut and .fill information on final grading plan. Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application: . ODOT approval is required for proposed development including access and utilities connected to Main Street. . . It is Public Worksunderstandin9 that fire access roads are required to be a minimum of 20' width and will require approval from the Fire Department. Revised 10/25/07 DatE> t,eceived: 6/~hotJrf Planner: AL