HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication APPLICANT 3/11/2009
.
City of Springfield
Development Services Department
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
Site Plan Review
Date Received:
MAR 1 1 2009
Original Submittal
Applicant Name: Randy McDouqall (541) 726-6645
Icompany: R. Repair & Service
IAddress: 244 39th Street, Springfield, OR 97478
I'_==-'_'AA-~-;:f"'.~.- n<-r-~~'::->,;(,_"',"~"" i..C--"i,--.- .~=,.,...,..,.., ^_~'c,""'_=,,_. ~_-~~'-;~"~=-'..-C:.-~~. .;::r~,-~ :'-=--~"'"-:~.~.,," !~~- ""'~" -- ".
IAPPlicant's Rep.: Scott Morris Phone: (541) 302-9790
Ico~pany: Olson & Morris Fax: (541) 485-3253
I~ddress: 380 Q Street, Ste 200 ",,~e~i~g,!l,:!~,:~S~.9L-:~L..._..____,__u ,",WO__...,
I Property Owner: Same as Applicant Phone:
Icompany: ,Fax:
IAddress:
, -,',. "- ....:-.._'<.."u.;:".,-~ q.c~_'-' ~,~'''''~'';L...,"...", '_r ~-_.''>'.~ _, ...~.,,"'...... .-""",~-'., ';'._~.-..j>;".,,:"-=~ ...=^t'~. "...-..,.~. ~..,,-;;; ..-,,-..-,.'
IASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17-02-31-41 ITAXLOT NOeS): 2000 ..
I Property Address: 244 39th Street
ISize of Property: 0.55 Acres . Acres' i::><'l Sauare Feet D
!proposed Name of Proiect: R.Repair Service Site Improvements.
I :.~".". "'''..~'''-'. __ .:t .~.-"'.~"'''",".''''_''''''='''""",''.._''''$",,,,",.' ._~,'_b':'C-'H.'"'." ",.."".__w==_,~C~:-'.:4;:...'":,,.,''''' ......"....,."'/",10.;.:....,=.-'''' '_",..0;='''_'''''=/',,,,,,,, ':-'1_._
I'DescriPtion of If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this appiication.
Proposal: Construct 6,380 square feet of new pavinq, landscape, and other code imps.
I Existing Use: Automotive and Boat Repair Shop
!New Impervious Surface Coverage (Including Bldg, Gross Floor Area): 6380 sf
ISi natures: Please si nand rint our name and date in the a riate box on the next
. -. -...-
Associated Applications:
Signs:
Pre-Sub Case No.: PJe.E..ZbOS-O:ObS Date: Reviewed by:
Icase No.: ~C-z.ooq-oooo5 Date: 3-/1-0'1 Reviewed by: ~L
IAPPlication Fee: $ 42.'Z-2..o0 ITechnical Fee: $ ~lI,IO I Postage Fee: $ 'bO.m
ITOTAL FEES: $ ~,\O PROJECT NUMBER: fre3UX!f6-600c;r;
1.}";;~an:a;:r;;::~T',.\~~Y.ii"'"~-';;'::iii;::~~-.9Ji"'K","b.~",,=i$.~""-:r:-L..:"._,,,,! ...,',';:;'~"'JA:rF0;':;;;~"t'~~.,_.~ BrI!F.E'..~:~~~f=rt:L-.~i:$ij?l,BE;5'S",,~.BiEX&:'f'e;-:'~::7iiJ,L~~c:->:
" Re'Jised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian
1 of 10 .
!.
Owner Signatures
This application form is used for both the requ[red pre-submittal meeting and subsequent
complete application submittal. Owner signatures are required at both stages in the application
process. An application without the Owner's original signature will not be accepted.
Pre-Submittal
The undersigned aCknowledges that the information in this application is correct and accurate for scheduling 'of the
Pre- Submittal Meeting,
Owner:
"..~~k.mct/~&
Signatured. " "if.
l< ("A'" (iy fVI-(, ~ .{')jAj ~d '-
Print
Date:
q~ /.2 -6'&
Submittal
I represent this a'ppJication to be completefor submittano the City. Consistent with the completeness check
performed on this application at the Pre"Submittal Meeting, I affirm the information ,identified by the City as
necessary for processing the application is provided herein or the. information will not be providedff not otherwise
contained within the submittal, and the City may t;egin processingJhe application with the information as
submitted. This statement' serves as written notice pursuant to the requirements of ORS 227.178 pertaining to a
complete application. .
Owner:
~ fl1l~ d"
Signature "2f ~
f(.av-Jf ' J\h ~ Ol-'J 6\ II ,
Print ",
Date:
.9' '"' 5 '- " 'f
'Date Received:
MAR 11 2009
Original submittal
Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian
2 of 10
Site Plan Review Application Process
1. Applicant Submits a Site Plan Review Application for Pre-Submittal
, -'.... -
o The application must conform to the Site Plan Review Subinittal Requirements
Checklist on pages 4-7 of this application packet.
o A pre-submittal meeting to discuss completeness is mandatory, and' pre-submittal '
meetings are conducted every Tuesday and Friday, from 10:00 am - noon.
" ..
o. Planning Division staff strives to conduct pre-submittal meetings within five to seven
working days of receiving an application.
2. Applicant and the City Conduct the Pre-Submittal Meeting
,0 The applicant, owner, and design team are 'strongly encouraged to attend the pre-
submittal meeting.
o The meeting is held wi,th representatives from Public Works Engineering and
, :
Transportation, Community Services (Building), Fire Marshall's office, and the Planning
Division and is,scheduled for 30 to 60 minutes.
o The Planner provides the applicant with a Pre-Submittal Checklist specifying the items
required to make the application complete if it is not already complete, and the
,applicant has 180 days submit a complete application to the City. '
3. Applicant Submits a Complete Application, City Staff Review the Application and
Issue a Decision
o A complete application must conform to the Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements
Checklist on pages 4-7 of this application packet.
. 0 A Type II decision, made after public notice, but without a public hearing, unless
appealed, is issued within 120 days of submittal of a complete application.
o Mailed notice is provided to property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the
property being reviewed and to any applicable neighborhood association. In addition,
the applicant must post one"sign, provided by the City, on the subject property.
o There is' a lA-day public comment period,. starting on" the date notice is mailed.
o Applications are distributed to the Development Review Committee, and their
comments are incorporated into a decision that addresses all applicable approval
criteria and/or development standards, as well as any written comments from those
given notice. .
o Applications may be approved, approved with conditions, or denied. ,
o At the applicant's request, the Planner can provide a copy of the draft lan"d 'use decision
prior to issuing the final land use decisio~. , "
. 1'1
o The City mails the applicant and any party of standing a copy of the decision, which is
effective on the,day it is mailed.
o The decision issued is the final decision of the City but may be appealed within 15
calendar days to the Planning Commission or Hearings Official.
Date Received:
MAR 1 1 2009
Revised 1/1/08 Moily Markarian
Original Submittal
3 of 10
Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements Checklist.
NOTE:
. ALL of the following items MUST be submitted for BOTH Pre-Submittal and Submittal.
. If you feel an item on the list below does not apply to your specific application, please
state the reason why and attach the explanation to this form.
Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee
calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development Services
Department. Any applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the
pre-submittal and submittal stages.
~
i::><'l
i::><'l
~
()?
i::><'l
~
~
~
i::><'l
Site Plan Review Application Form.
Narrative explaining the purpose of the proposed development, the existing use of the
property, and any additional information that may have a bearing in determining the
action to be taken. The narrative should also include the proposed number ofemployees
and future expansion plans, if known.
"..
'.
Copy of the Deed
Copy of a Preliminary Title Report issued within the past 30' days documenting
ownership and listing all encumbrances: ' .
Copy of the Site Plan Reduced to 8'/2"x 11", which will be mailed as part 'of the
required neighboring property notification packet.
Right-of-Way Approach Permit Application provided where the property has frontage
on an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) facility.
Three (3) Copies of t"'e Stormwater Management System Study with Completed
Stormwater Scoping Sheet Attached - The plan, supporting calculations and
documentation must be consistent with the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures
Manual. .
Three (3) Copies of the Traffic Impact Study prepared by a Traffic Engineer in
accordance with SDC 4.2-105 AA. Traffic Impact Studies (TIS) allow the City to analyze
and evaluate the traffic impacts and mitigation of a development on the City's
transportation system. In general, a TIS. must explain how the traffic from a given
development affects the transportation system in terms of safety, traffic operations,
access and mobility, and immediate and adjoining street systems. A TIS must also
address, if needed, City, metro plan and state land use and transportation policies and
objectives.
Seven (7) Copies of the Following Plan Sets for Pre-Submittal OR
Eighteen (18) Copies of the Following Plan Sets for Submittal
i::><'l All ofthe following plans must include the scale appropriate tothe area involved and
sufficient to show detail of the plan and related data, north arrow, and date of
preparation. Date Received:
i::><'l All plan sets must be folded to 8y," by 11" and bound by rubber bands.
. ' MARl12009
a. Site Assessment of Existing Conditions
i::><'l Prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect or Engine@riginaISubmitl..1
Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian
4 of 10
i::><'l Vicinity Map
<
i::><'l The name, location and dimensions of all existing site features including buildings, curb
cuts, trees and impervious surface areas, clearly indicating what is remaining and what
is being removed. For existing structures to remain, also indicate present use, size,
setbacks from property lines, ~and distance between buildings.
i::><'l The name, iocation,dimensions, direction of fiow and top of bank of all watercourses
and required riparian setback that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse
Map on file in the Development Services Department
i::><'l The 100-year floodplain and floodway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest
adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment
or Letter of Map Revision .
i::><'l The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3-200 and delIneated on the Wellhead
. . Protection Areas Map on file in the Development Services Department
, . .
i::><'l Physical features including, but not limited to trees 5" in diameter or greater when
measured 4 V2 feet above the ground, signific;ant clusters of trees and shrubs, riparial')
areas, wetlands and rock outcroppings
i::><'l Soil types and water table information as mapped and specified in the Soils Survey of
Lane County. A Geotechnical Report prepared by'an Engineer must be submitted
concurrently if the Soils Survey indicates the proposed development' area has unstable
soils and/or a high water table
b. Site Plan
i::><'l Prepared by an Oregon licensed Architect, Landscape Architec~, or Engineer
i::><'l Proposed buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area applicable to the
parking requirement for the proposed use(s)), setbacks from property lines, and
distance between buildings - .
. .
i::><'l Location and height of existing or proposed fences, walls, outdoor equipment, storage,
trash receptacles, and signs
i::><'l Location, dimensions, and number of typical, compact and disabled parking spaces;
. including aisles, wheel bumpers, directional signs, and striping
i::><'l Dimensions of the development area, as well as area and percentage of.the site
propo?ed for buildings, structures, parking and vehicular areas, sidewalks, patios, and-
other' impervious surfaces ,-
i::><'l Observance of solar access requirements as specified in the applicable zoning district
i::><'l On-site loading areas and vehicular and pedestrian circulation
i::><'l Access to streets, alleys, and properties to be served, including the location and
dimensions of existing and proposed curb cuts and curb cuts proposed to be closed
i::><'l Location, type, and number of bicycle parking spaces
i::><'l Locationof existing and. proposed transit facilities
i::><'l Area and dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for
common open spaces, recreational areas, and other similar public and semi-public uses
i::><'l Phased Development Plan - where applicable, the Site Plan application must include a
phasing plan indicating any proposed phases for development, inclucfH\€Iten~et~'cl€lf.j'es
and sequencing of each phase. Phasing must progress in a sequence promoting street
connectivity between the various phases of the development and accorHrModatirl'9CGther .
Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian
.""...:-:~.......: ~ .\.... ,}5 of 10
Ii". :: 1_>_ ~7::'.~( t_ .,,_, ,_ ~<_
"'-,
required public improvements, including but not limited to, sanitary sewer, stormwater
management, water, and electricity. The applicant must indicate which phases apply
to the Site Plan application being submitted.
"'~ .
c. Improvement and Public Utilities Plan
i::><'l Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer
i::><'l Location and width of all existing and proposed easements
i::><'l Location, widths (of paving and right-of-way), and names of all existing and proposed
. " streets, alleys, dedications or other right-of-ways within or adjacent to the proposed
development, including ownership and maintenance status, if applicable. '
i::><'l Location and type of existing and proposed street lighting
i::><'l Location of existing and required traffic control devices, fire hydrants, power poles,
transformers, neighborhood mailbox units, and similar public facilities
i::><'l Location, width, and construction material of all existing and proposed sidewalKs,
sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways, and trails
i::><'l Location and size of existing and proposed utilities on and adjacent to the site including
sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas,
telephone, and cable TV. Indicate the proposed connection points
d. Grading, Paving, & Stormwater Management Plan
i::><'l Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer
i::><'l Planting plan prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect where plants are
proposed as part of the stormwater management system
i::><'l Roof drainage patterns and discharge locations
i::><'l Pervious and impervious area drainage patterns
i::><'l The size and location of stormwater management systems compone.nts, including but.
not limited to: drain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention ponds; stormwater
quality measures;' and natural drainageways to be retained
i::><'l Existing and proposed spot elevations and contours lines drawn at 1 foot intervals (for
land with a slope over 10 percent, the contour lines may be at 5 foot intervals)
i::><'l Amount of proposed cut and fill
e. Landscape Plan
i::><'l Drawn by a Landscape Architect
i::><'l Location and dimensions of landscaping and open space areas to include calculation of
landscape coverage
i::><'l Screening in accordance.with SDC 4.4-110
i::><'l Written description, including.specifications, of the permanent irrigation system
i::><'l Location and type of street trees
i::><'l List in chart form the proposed types of landscape materials (trees, shrubs, ground
cover). Include in the chart genus, species, common name, quan&9.teiReiSp~~:,
and method of planting .
f. Architectural Plans
MAR 1 1 2009
Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian
OrigInal Submitt<>1
6 of 10
. ~~~ Exter,ior' ele,vations of all bUilding, sand $tructures proposed for the development site,
i\.i including height , ' 'm" ,
~ Conceptual floor plans , .,.... ' '.. '.
g. .On-Site Lighting Plan
~ Location, orientation, and maximum height of exterior light fixtures, both free standing
and attached
~ Type and extent of shielding, including cut-~ff angles, and type of illumination,
wattage, and luminous area ,-
~~Photometric test report for each" light source
D Additional Materials That May be Required
IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL
STANDARDS/APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE
APPLICANT SHOULD CONSIDER UTILIZING PRE-DEVELOPMENT MEETINGS AS
DISCUSSED IN SDC 5.1-,120:
D Where a multi-family development is proposed, any additional materials to
demonstrate compliance with SDC 3.2-240
D ' Riparian Area Protec~ion Report for properties located within 150 feet of the top of
bank of any Water Quality Limited Watercours~s (WQLW) or within 100 feet of the
top of bank of any direct tributaries of WQLW
D A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be submitted concurrently if
there are unstable soils and/or a high water table present
D Where the development area is within an overlay district, address the additional
standards of the overlay distriCt
D If five or more trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling Permit as specified
in SDC 5.19-100
D A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon Division of State Lands must be
submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the p'roperty
D Any required federal or state permit must be submitted concurrently or evidence
the permit application has been submitted for review
D Where any grading, filling or excavating is proposed with the development, a Land
and Drainage Alteration permit must be submitted prior to development
D Where applicable, any Discretionary Use or Variance as specified in SDC 5.9-100
and 5.21-100
D An Annexation application, as specified in SDC 5.7-100, where a development is
proposed outside of the city limits but within the City's urban service area and can
be served by sanitary sewer
Date Received:
MAR 1 I 2009
Original Submittal
Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian
7 of 10
225 Fifth Street
. Springfield, Oregon 97477
541-726-3759 Phone
Job/Journal Number
DRC2009-00008
DRC2009-00008
DRC2009-00008
Payments:
Type of Payment
Check
cReceintl
{e
,
I
I
I
RECEIPT #:
Description
CTY Site Plan Review
+ 5% Technology Fee
Postage Fee Type II - $160
Paid By
RANDY MCDOUGALL
y of Springfield Official Receipt
uevelopment Services Department
Public Works Department
3200900000000000159
3:07:46PM
Date: 03/11/2009
Item Total:
Check Number Authorization
Recc.ived By B:ltch Number Number How Received
Amount Due
4,222,00
211.10
160,00
$4,593.10
Amount Paid
ddk
$4,593,10
$4,593.10
1044
In Person
Payment Total:
Date Received:
,
MM 1 1 2009
Original Submittal
Page 1 of 1
3/11/2009
III'
II I
Ii!
III
II I
'I !i
I,::: III ~
Ii
I : I
I d'
I'
I II
II '
r:"-:-:-. I LI,~
" J 1'"",--1,
~~ 1 (. =- --~I-~i :'
";:.._ Ii i ~[] r I, Cfy =-=~ J! :~:~/ ~
I'~I'\ ~':'~'I --....... .&Mf;lfTt, ",
." ,-=-\ ...wucce I /; r ::t1
'\\0,\\)\ 1 I :.~... ~\~ gL U,I I!
~ I 0........ ~..... I, lill
'I ........ I Ii Eli
Lr:t.:!!-....- I, II
I 1-:..- .... IIJ, I'll
.... I, RII
1 1.i.I I:
I ~ "
I 1 ,,,,,I! II
,,~\ I, II
II U :i
I 1 1 il I
I, I
I a Iii I
'I- 1 I
.1 11 I
.......
l. ...1IIOI'CIo't.UlCIIIQI.IOII.I:._-""IIIJK1...........Z7...
.....~IO.o.tM.._f\OlO~
2. _""OI..SlItlS~UJIO~
1- M:JICIh'I$DCDl.OI'__"""-' _'-IfDPIIO__
..-
... r:as.t1llllQ.C......UfILI!O.-. ......._.-.0..._
.._"..
,. ~...l.IIICaarr-..__.CISt.~_.
_s=tIlI(II."SIIal ~.....
.. _."'10'",,*,"11(_
t....:...~~OlIIIICIIL
.. ftlI__UDlD_-.
.. .....lSl,IICIlQ_III...__._JCJIIL
,,~
,\'"
""""
'1,\'?
\,~
....' "''''
\ \'
..'
~,\~\fj\
~
I
",,\"
'"
",,\<P
'"
" \'"
""
sm; ann..... StT
...
R REPAIR SERVICE
lU.l/' U.'':U~ll.ii:01S. UtI......
SPIIIlFIE1D. ~ cxum.__
1 I
TI
1
1
1
I
I
'I
v---
'6f"
"""
~\... ..
,..
_.,~, \: '/.\*
".. "" '"
,,~
"-.:
""g:
",\'
\1o?'....a
....' ,,~
\\'"
""~..
"",,,,,
~.p.
""
'\\o~\
L
r
"
g
-,'"
"
lie...
-'--"-, ._-" I1:1III.....__
c..-.,.c:.._1IDG
--:-I'lr- r.-._1lIl:
)':; c-.-ot1Cll:ll
~ ---
-~ -.......
l!i-....- - c-........
~ --
---
D r.-._....
-11)'11 - _s.-.......
.~.c C1111111IIItI..
.... ........lIIkC~
-Q- _1OIClt..
~."'"
.--
.. -....
~..tMJI.
PIllIlItT_
__Jls_
.....-
.-01lllUl__
SMlIlJlQ.O,.... ""n
1'IOt:~11___
I. ~l)___
I._."~
--~
...-...
.......... -
mtllNG lIGIND
.........--.-
".IOII_~
.....-.lIDIII:I-.
.uDlllll
CI.~....
Q 1lll:1I'lCUlNCII....
Cl 1lll:(DI$II;ICIIClII,,--,
a ........
Ie-I UW'
~l ...-......'
Date Received:
MAR 1 1 2009
Original Submittlll
"
Iii .,[
i . (~l ~
) ""',,,'"
1;('.=
, "" lili
Ii s 'E I'~.,
<J:l 0 1Il111C";
1.0 :':,; ,::..
rw,
rC!~
!
; '1
@ IJ) f
~ ~... Q
[5 -"C; I
i2 l}.s
<<: <l::
"
0<l:: I
JJ J H>
, , '" ~ ''''
f. _I"'''''''
~~~.r~~<
d >1 ::! ~;,~ 8
ljt.
SHEET
CI
of
4.
,
Jj
\...11 i OF SPRINb1<II'..LD
VICIru 1 i MAP
DRC2009-00008
244 39th Street
~
td
;t
tt;
....
C/)
:t
....
b
'<t
Date Received:
MAR 1 1 2009
Original Submittal
s..~
Map 17-02-31-41
Tax Lot 2000
North
..
. ~ --";I"
~n,
~DJl
\.
..
>>..L-.'
OILSON &
M\ORRIIS
A division of
L.a. Olson & Associates, Inc.
Consulting Engineers
Land Surveyors
Urban Planners
380 Q Street
Suite 200
Springfield, Oregon 97477
(541) 302-9790
Fax: (541) 485-3253
olsonandmorris.com
R. Repair Service
Site Improvements
Owner / ADDI icant
R. Repair Service
Randy Mcdougall
244 39th Street
Springfield, OR 97478
Aoolicants Reoresentative
Olson & Morris
Attn: Scott Morris, PE
380 Q Street, Ste 200
Springfield, OR 97477
Landscaoe Architect
Matt Koehler, LA.
1554 Larkspur Lp.
. Eugene, OR 97401
Proiect Overview
R. Repair & Service is an automotive and boat repair shop that has been located at 244 39th Street
in Springfield for the past 12 years. There is an existing approximate 5,200 square foot structure
on the property that was built sometime in the 1960's in a Quonset hut style (see attached
pictures). The construction of the building was positioned on the lot veiy close to the front
property line, with a row of parking in front of the building.
The property is zoned light medium industrial (LM!) and is abutting LMI property to the ~outh,
and low density residential (LDR) to the north and west. All of the abutting properties have
existing structures, except the lot to the south is being used as vehicle storage. There is also an
existing apartment complex across 39th Street to the east.
This project is being initiated due to a complaint about the site not meeting Springfield
. Development Code standards, and that a site review process was never completed for the current
use. Since more than half the site has existing improvements already installed, we are making an
effort to bring the site into compliance where we can. The following pages give a,description of
some of the key elements in the plan to bring the site into code compliance, and discusses
challenges on the site where it is not necessarily economically feasible to meet the letter of the
code.
Date Reoelved: ' '~
MAR I 1 2@9
Original Subrnitt?'
1
Parkin!!
The existing conditions sheet shows that the current parking for the building is in front of the building
with the backing space being the public right of way. The parking configuration is very tricky, since the,
building was placed so close to the right of way line. However, we have reconfigured the front parking as
shown on the site plan to keep the backing spaces internal to the property and have added an ADA
accessible space. '
The number of parking spaces required for this type of use is one per employee, which would be 3. The
proposal on the site plan is to have 3 standard parking spaces and 1 ADA space. There is also overflow
parking available on 39th Street.
We have included a loading zone in front of the building adjacent to the right of way. One of the issues
has been customers picking up and dropping off their boats at non pre-arranged times. Subsequently,
there are times that the staging has taken place on the street which has caused issues with the traveling
public. This is not an unusual condition forJ9th Street, as there are many business' to the south that stage
deliveries on the street causing an unsafe traffic condition. This has included delivery trucks parked on.
the street unloading with fork lifts, and at other times motor homes and other recreational vehicles parked
on the street waiting for service at Zilkoski Auto Electric. Therefore, we feel that by adding this loading
zone we are helping the current situation.
Bicycle parking has also been added to the site at the east side of the building, as shown on the site plan
sheet. There are (4) spaces required by code, with the 3 short term being provided by a rack in front of
the building, and the I I<;ng term space provided inside the structure. .
The parking stall proposaed at the northeast corner of the property does not meet the specific setback
standard of 18 feet from the back of walk. This was discussed at the pre-submittal meeting with
Transportation staff, and we specifically request a variance to the standard for this case. We do not feel
this parking space will create an unsafe traffic situation. 39th Street is a local street with many driveways,
so motorists are aware of the possibility of vehicles stopping on 39th Street to make a turn into or out of a
driveway and are generally driving at low speeds. Also being a local street, it is a rarity that there are
vehicles closely spaced together while driving down the street. Since there is good site distance from
both directions, I don't really see the instance where a,car would be making the turn from 39th Street into
the property and then suddenly see a vehicle backing out of this space and having to stop abruptly, thus
causing a problem with vehicles'on 39th Street. Since this site is short of parking, we feel this parking
space should be allowed to remain as proposed as it will not create an unsafe situation.
Site U"htino:
There is an existing street light on the east side of39th Street across from the building. There are also (3)
existing private lights attached to the building. There are (2) on the west side and (I) on the east side.
There is no additionallightil;g proposed for the site as part of this plan.
Utilities
Most utilities are already available to other buildings within the site as discussed below:
h
!
Date Received:
MAR 1 I ,aU9
(".
Original Submitti'\l
Sanitary Sewer
The sanitary sewer service is existing and ties into the existing 8" line at the west side 6fthe property.
The main line is in an existing easement on the property. There is no new sanitary sewer service or
modification planned as part of this project.
Water
The domestic water for the building is provided by an existing meter along the right of way east of the
building. There is currently no irrigation or fire protection system on the property, and no new services
are proposed as part of this project.
Electric
There is existing overhead power feed,to ihe building from 39'h Street that is proposed to remain. There
are no proposed new ele~trical facilities as part ofthis project.
Phone f Cable f Natural Gas
There is currently phone service to the building only. Other facilities exist adjacent to the right of way of
39th Street, but no new s.ervices are proposed as part of this project.
Storm Drainage
The existing stOml drainage has evolved over time as the site has been developed. The current system
basically has (3) destinations. The front of the building is so close to the property line, that the run off
from the paved area drains out to 39th Street and enters into a curb inlet at the north end of the property.
The ITont half of the building is collected in roof drains and flows to 39th Street via weep holes. Since this
area is very constrained due to the placement of the building, no changes are proposed except to the new
parking at the north end (discussed below).
The rear of the property (including the back half of the building) is collected in a trench grate in front of
the rear bay doors to the shop. This trench grate is currently tied into a system on the adjacent property to
the south (possibly a drywell) that eventually enters 39th Street via a weep hole. ,
The rear of the property and the existing gravel portions (to be paved) will now all be directed to a new
bio-swale proposed along the north property line. The attached stonn water report shows the detailed
calculations for the bio-swale, which has been designed to handle the capacity and provide'a minimum
9.0 minutes of contact time for water quality. The new paving will be graded to sheet flow over to the
bio-swale, while the existing paving will be addressed by adding a sump pump to the trench grate and
directing a pressure line to the bio-swale. .
The proposed small parking are in, the northeast corner of the property is intended to have pervious
concrete. This is designed to treat the water prior to entering.into a perforated pipe and then conveyed to
the piped system that ties into the existing curb inlet.
This proposal brings the site into code compliance by having mcirethanSO% of the paving on site being
cleaned by either the bio-swale or the pervious concrete section.
Date Received:
MAR 1 1 2009
*,';:!"
Original Submittal
Landscaoe
The existing site has very little landscaping, and due to existing improvements there are some constraints
on bringing the site up to existing code. The attached landscape plan shows the concept of adding (2)
planters to the frontage of the property to enhance the appearance along 39th Street. The proposal then is .
to have a 7 foot planter along the north line, planted as per code and containing a bio-swale at the western
end of the property. .
The south line of the property has a zero setback to the existing improvements. Since the property to the
south is also zoned light medium industrial, there is no proposal to add landscape along that property line.
The western property line is proposed to have some new plantings, and keep some of the existing
plantings. As shown on the plan, there is a row of existing arbor vidae and trees in the 7 foot public
utility easement on the south end of the property (see attached photo's). The proposal is to leave this area
"as is" since a formidable screen is already provided to the neighboring property. The northern property
on the west line currently does not have vegetative screening, but the neighbor is using the buffer ar~a as
a garden. The proposal is to plant a row of arbor vidae on the east side of the garden area to continue the
screen that exists to the south.
The landscape plan was developed with native species that are drought resistant, as the owner does not
propose to install an automatic irrigation system. Due to the existing improvements on the site, the owner
feels that the cost is prohibitive and is proposing to hand water the plants until they are fully established.
Fencin!!
As shown on the existing conditions sheet, there is a six foot chain link fence with slats along the north
and west property lines. There is also sections of fence on the south line and then on the east side with
gates that provide access to the rear of the shop.
Currently the fences on the north and west side are not on the property lines, and are encroaching onto
this property by as much as seven feet. During this time, the property owners to the west have used that
seven feet for planting, gardens, shed, etc.. Therefore, We are not proposing to move the fence on the
west line to provide a full landscape buffer as required by code. We feel the neighbors would rather leave
the fence and their associated uses as existing, and hence are asking the City for leeway along this
property line.
Mr. McDougall has spoken with the neighbor to the north and the proposal is to move the fence over to
the property line and plant that landscape .buffer. There is no significant vegetation within the seven feet
along that property line, so this is a logical improvement.
Buildin!! Elevations
The building is was constructed in the 1960's and there are no plan elevations available. We have
attached photos of all four existing elevations of the building to this application.
Trash Enclosure
R. Repair Service currently has a small dumpster that sits at the front of the site in the open. Mr.
McDougall has determined that his business does not need dumpster service. He will be replacing the
small dumpster with standard residential size trash can that can be kept in the shop and wheeled out to the
street at the appropriate times. Therefore a trash enclosure is not part ofthis proposaL
Date Received:
,
,
!i
t.
r
MAR 1 1 2009
Original Submittal______u_ .
Fire Protection
The existing building is not sprinkled, and there are no plans to add a sprinkler system. There is an
existing fire hydrant adjacent to 39th Street near the north property line. All portions of the existing
building are within 250 feet of the fire hydrant, so no new hydrant is proposed.
The landscape plan has been designed to allow a minimum clearance of3 feet on all sides of the existing
fire hydrant.
Date Received:
MAR 1 1 2009
Original Submittal
'\l!I
I
rA-~-r
t: l-ti V ~T I 0 f-.-J
Date Received: T
'1~
~f.A'~ t I" "'flog
1\', 1\ I f.....J
';"',.
. ~:";:!.
";
Original Submittal
"'-...,
"~.
'. '_."-
, Original Submitt~::
~Oa,TIt- I:r-Ll!"V~'TIO t-....:J
5'o~TI+ r!L~ V4-TIC"-.:)
09t~ R~~ejved: 1
,
.~
ij
MA~ 1 1 2~~9
Origin:;;! Submittal
Date Received.:
MAH I 12009
"
1
J
.~
(',
Original Submittal
IN e.S'l' !ELlZV"",--no/0
. .-~- .,'!:i
t.~ . ,.
OILSON &
MloRRllS
A division of
L.B. Olson & Associates, Inc.
Consulting Engineers
Land Surveyors
Urban Planners
380 Q Street
Suite 200
Springfield, Oregon 97477
(541) 302-9790
Fax: (541) 485-3253
olson and morris. com
Storm Water Design Report
Project:
Date:
Designer:
Type of Project:
R Repair Service
September 2, 2008
Wade R. Holaday, PE
Commercial
Proiect Overview
The project consists of adding 6,000 square feet of concrete storage area, 530 square feet
of asphalt parking area, and removing 315 square feet of existing asphalt paving. The
project includes regarding the existing gravel storage area to allow the placement of the
concrete and draining this new area to a bio swale along the north property line.
Pronosed Destination
The drainage from new concrete area will flow into the proposed bio-swale; the bio-
swale will flow into a new pipe system that will be connected to the backside of an
existing curb inlet along 39th Street.
Prooosed Pollution Control Facilities
A bio-swale will be constructed at the northwest corner of the project to vegetatively
filter more than the 50% of the new impervious area. The catch basin for the remaining
area will be equipped with a Fossil Filter insert.
Proiect Site Data
Impervious Area (to bi07swale) = 12,711 sf
Impervious Area (to catch basin) = 3,299 sf
Water Quality Intensity = 0.25 inches per hour (Rational Method)
Peak Flow Intensity = 1.4 in/hr (2 yr, 10 min.) 2.4 in/hr (25 yr, 10 min.)
Run off Coefficient = 0.90 (Commercial)
Water Oualitv Flow Calculations
Q = 0.90(0.25) 0.29 = 0.065 cfs
Date Received:
Peak Flow Calculations
MAR I i 2DD9 1;
Q = 0.90(1.4) 0.29 = 0.365 cfs (2 yr event)
Q = 0.90(2.4) 0.29 = 0.626 cfs (25 yr event)
OrlginCiI S:.:M':ittai _
. .. ~ ~~.j
.~..
,
Bio Swale Flow SummarY
Bottom Width = 2 foot
Channel Slope = 0.50 %
Channel Length = 80 feet
Water Quality flow velocity = 0.12 fps
Contact Time = 11.1 minutes
Water Quality flow depth = 0.20 feet
Date Received:
MAl? 1 f i!~::9
Original Submilial
"
!
;
.,,-
.~
09/02/200S 13:17 FAX 541 1._ 1021
. --. --.---- --.--. .......... -..,..... .,........... ...............
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD Ph
'..T.L..,:1V., IX .!!IU.lU'OJ."),
1410021003
~OOl
,PUBLIC WORKS DEP;\RTMRNT I Encimlenng Di"i~jOll
- -
Fax: ($41) 736-1021
STORMW ATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SCOPE OF WORK
..- (Arill1 helo'"tll~ lill.filled olit by .4"plie"lIfj _...
(Pf,ase return to Matt SIOUder@CiryofSprlngfie/dPublic WO,k$ E"gilleerlng; Fax # 7J6-JfJJJ, Pf,o". # .736-1035.)
Project NaJ:\le; f(, fi,~f~;~ ';<J".~ ';:.J... I...", Applicant: i2"->J:l ik. OO~/ 1/
Assessors Parcel II: n -0.. - ::I i- 4/ "11.. Z"" 0 Date: 't h J () g
Land Use(s): L iI1J: Phone #: '1U. _ 4J.4"
t'rojectSize(Acres): ().5"IM"',,! Fax#: AS/{'- ~'1.,"~
Approx. TmperviousArea: I~J!llJ Pr"'~..",) Email: ~rr!!J, (l1<........J ""......,;. ,.'"
Project Description (Incl\Jde a copy of Assessor's map): ,
U~1"".l. tJ";'T':') 5.+.., -h ixlkr ,I.,IL.-." J" Sr)(. t:"J.. hr....""':""".
, " ,j _< J. t:",.." rl
vi II b.. <:!: '-).50 1=:; 2. /04,~"-' J w..~"J<7'- I ~k "" ,
p."A koq
11-,1,):1,....,
t.1~I':"J<
Drainage Propos~1 (~blic connecti~n{S), dischm:&e location(s). etc. Attach additional sheel(s) if necessary: \
e70/I"'':~ f1~I/d'.J ~--..( r.,..,j- P"""'l -1-0, 0('/-..1 -+r..., $",-... ""''''' ("''''''/ -",,\)
/.1,_ .....".~l -s; P."./..;, a! tv..", E>- '.,...:.) f'_t~ J Ib~a,( ..10 JJe_ 1'.... k J 11.._
c"".__-'-.I +.. I,..",/<. ..f t::I'id,:"} C,,/J 1...4r-1~ >'l1!o f~J.
Proposed Stormwater Best Management Practices:
(;.~l 5.... k "'/ ~ f...." J_..., -/., ""'~'Ic
cr.o ~,,,,,'.....k .c"....J....cJ 7,~ M~,,.,,.,.;..........
-..~-,. IAI'~a belnw Il1if Ihlt! fil/~!lII)I.l1 hi' 'lit! Cillo {/Jill Ildll",t!.(/ to lite /l.PI1I1,'(1/10 _:.._
(AI. minimum. 0/1 "CLT"" .he.k.d by Ih. Cily on IhelNnl and back a/lhls slt'.1 sltall be fJubmil/.d
.fbr an appliealion 10 h. eO"lplelefor .'ubm/l/ol. af/hough olher reqlliremeJJlS may be nece.vsory)
DraiJJal!e Study Tv~'.l 'Ii'OSPM Section 4.03.2): (Note. Ul:I may be substituted fOT Ratlonal Metbod}
$I' Small Site Study - (us. Rational Method forcal.ula'ions)
o Mid-Level DeveIopment Study - (USol Unit Hydrograph /vlelhod for calculations)
o Full Drainage Development Study - (use Unit Hydrogrdph Method for calculations)
.!.Cnmonment,,1 ConsideratIons: ' ()
.. Wellhead Zone: -ze, "-- -r~"T';M Z: IW Hillside Development:
If) Wetland/Riparian: ,14 _ ~ FloodwaylFloodplain:
& Soil TyPe: G, - ..1\", I.n) ~ LAiokJ !l Otha Jurisdictions:
Downstream Analvsis:, ' Dtrr>~
~ N/A
o Flow line for starting water surface elevation;
o Design HGL to use for starting water surtace elevation:
o Mallhole/JWlction to take analysis to:
rJA
.i/A
Return to Mati Stouder (oj City of Sllrinefield. email: m.touderlrcJ,ci.smin!!field.a1',IlS, FAX, 1$40730..1021
Date Received:'!
Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian
MAl, 1 1 2009
9 or "0
Original Submittal
OQ/02/2008 13:17 FAX 541' ~.. 1021
~~/U~/~VUO v~;o~ ~44 a4~ ~o~ J~D~
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD Ph
U"'~UN ~ MU!<.lU ~
~ 003/003
IdJ 002
COMPLETE STUDY ITEMS I FocOffiolw U...Qnly M4<;
"Ba,..d upon th.lnformation prt7llided on th.jr.", ofthl. .1,."'. thisfollowingrepresenn 0 mini"",", o/"Ih,,' is needed/or On
ClpplicQlion to be comple.tejor submittal wirh respect to drainage; however, 1M., Iisi .'1hou!t:J ntJl be u,ied inlilJ'U o/lIuJ Springfield
Dt!vel()pm~t?t Cnde (.SOC) or lite Cf1JJ's b;gb~s8rin.g Design Manual. Compliance with thf:.'ft: t"equiremt!nt$ doe.t no! cnn.tlltufe sile
appro",,/, Addirionol $IIUp&;ific informalion may be reqUired. No..: Upon ;coping sheelllUbmltlo/. ensure ""mpletedform ha.\'
been s;gned in the space provided helm.;):
Interim n""Sn Standard.MI.te. Quality (EDSPM Chapt...!)
R.q'ri N/A
ijf, 0 AIf non-building rooftop (NBR) Impervious surface. shalf be pre-tre.ted (.,11, multi.chamberod catchb..in wloil
filtnilion media) fo,stonnwatcr quality. Addirionally, a minimum of50% ofthe NBR impervious surfu.:e shall be
treated by vegetated merhoda.
fiI 0 Where required, vegetative slomlwarer design shall be consistent Wilh inlerim design smndards (EDSPM Section '3.02),
set forth by the Bureau ofl5nvil'Qnmemal Services (BBS) <>1' Clean Water Services (CWS).
8il 0 For new NRR impervious area les. than 15,000 square I.e~ a simplified design approach may be followed as specified
by the BES for vegetative "\>Q;~'J'O;:"', .
'Sid' 0 If a storm_er treatment swale is proposed, subrill! calcLllallons/specificarions for sizing. velocity, flow, side slopes.
bottom slop~ and seed mix consisttmt with either BES or C~S requiremenrs.
'iii 0 Water Quality calculations as required in.5cerlon 3.03.l of the BDSI'M
.fii- 0 All building rooftop moun~d equipment, <>r other fluid conlaining equipmenlloeated oul.!iide ofrhe building. shall
be provIded with secondary containment or weather resiStant enclOsure.
Cene".l Study Requirements (EDSf'M Section 4,03) .
1M 0 Drainall" study prepared by a Proressional Civil Engineer licensed ill tho Mate of Oregon.
o fjj A complete drainage StUdy, as reqUired in EDSPM Section 4.03.1. including a hYdrological study mop.
III 0 Celculations silo"'ing system capacity for a 2-year storm event and overflow effecrs ofa 25-Yeflt ",arm event.
o !II. The time of concentration (Te) ~han b. determined using a 10 minute start lime for d.v~loped basins.
Review or DOWnstream System (EDSPM Section 4.03.4.(;) . .
o ~ A downstream drainage analysis as described In EDSPM Section 4_03.4.C_ On..it. drainage shall be governed by rhe
Oregon PlumbingSpeciahy Code (OPSe).
D III Elevatiol\!l oflhe HCL and flow Jines for both city and private s)'>iem. where appiicable.
Dl:Sign .rStorm 5Y"lems (EDSPM Section 4.04) .
.. 0 Flow line3. !;Iopes. rim elevations, plpe type an,d sb:e~ cll!llU'ly indicated On the plan set.
liI 0 Minimum pipe covc:rshall be 18 inches fo,. reinforced pipe and 36 Inches for plain concrete and plasti~ pipe materials.
- or proper engineering calculations shall ~le providlt;d whlJn'less. The covel' shall be sufficient IO suPPOrt an 80,000 lb
load without failure ofrhe pipe structure.
D ~ Manning',~ "n" val.es for pipes shall be con.i,tent with Table 4.1 oCthe EDSP. All storm pipes shall be desigl1ed [Q
achieve a minimum velociIy ofrhree (3) f.e, per .eoond at 0.5 pipe full based on TPble 4-1 "" well,
Other/Mise
iiI 0 Exis!ing and proposed conlours,loeated at one fOOl interval. Include Spot elevations and 'site grncles Showing how .ire
drains
~ 0 Pri'VG.te stOTmwater easements shaJl be c(ellrly.~epil;ted on plans when p~iVatel stQnnwater flows from 0'l1c: property to
another
o IiJ Drywdls shalJ not receive runofffrom any surface wlo being treated by on. or more BMPs. with the exceplion of
residential building roofs (EDSP Section 3.03.4.A). Additional pt<>vi.ions apply to mi... required by the DEi;): Refer
to che webshe: \.Y\l\.'I.".dell.'ll'.i')r~.m', 11.~lWoll!t'ollndw.B/uiC'homrZ_ht'm for mori!: information.
o Iii Def<lnlion ponds shail be designed to limit runoff to _development mtes for the 2 thrnugh 2S-year stann events
. *l'i!/a form s.llRII be inclzuled IlS lilt flttaJ:h.nf6Jt, InNlde! tllt:front CWttrJ tJf Ibif ~103'mJl}ale,. study
. IM"(7KrA!Vl~ ENGINEER PU:.:4SJ:: IIEAD BELOW IINlJ SIGN.' I
A.~ thl!: engineer of ~C/nJ' 1 erclccTti(Y the ubove r'eqIJil'e'd itlSms are cQmpJete and included with the submitted srormwa!~r study and
plan set / /
Signature: ",,--. Oat.: '1 -z-. <) g
{ . I
Date Received:
Revlsli:d 1/1{OS Molly Markarian
MAI1 1 j 200910 ollO
Original Submittal
......
-'4
1<5>'
,;;-
II r
'( .\.)1.1 ~;.It I
'to'!> I'
, .,
'~
/Di-;lsi-on -of -Chief Deputy Clerk 2008.0-0-5-0-97~
Lane County Deeds and Records
~~lIU~l~lt~!~Wlm~Wll~11111111111 $36.00
RPR-DEED Cnt=1 Stn-_6' 01/29/2008 II :07:00 AM
CASHIER D7
$15.00 $11.00 $10.00
After recording return to:
R. Repair & Constructions, Inc.
244 39th Street
Springfield, OR 97478
Until a change is requested all tax statements
shall be sent to the following address:
R. Repair & Constructions, Inc.
244 39th Street
Springfield, OR 97478 ,
File No.: 7075-1006298 (KE)
Date: January 15, 2008
STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED
Brunner Capital, LLC, an Oregon Limited Liability Company, Grantor, conveys and warrants to
Randy S. McDougall, Grantee, the following described real property free of liens and encumbrances,
except as speCifically set forth herein:
See Legal Description attached hereto as Exhibit A and by this reference incorporated herein.
Subject to:
1. Covenants, conditions, restrictions and/or easements, if any, affecting title, which may appear in
the public record, including those shown on any recorded plat or survey.
The true consideration for this conveyance is $260,000.00. (He,. complV with requ;remenls of ORS 93.030)
Date Received:
MAR 1 1 2009
Originai Submittal
Page 1 of 3
........
.
,
APN,0122273
File No,: 7075-1006298 (KE)
Dale: 01/15/2008
Statutory Warranty Deed
. continued
BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING nns INSTRUMENT; THE PERSON TRANSFERRING FEE TITLE SHOULD
INQUIRE ABOUT THE PERSON'S RIGHTS, IF ANY, UNDER ORS 195.300, 195.301 AND 195.305 TO 195-
336 AND SECTIONS 5 TO 11, OF CHAPTER 424, OREGON LAWS 2007. THIS INSTRUMENT DOES NOT
ALLOW USE OF THE PROPER1Y DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND
USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON
ACQUIRING FEE mLE TO THE PROPER1Y SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE cm OR COUN1Y
PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY THAT THE UNIT OF LAND BEING TRANSFERRED IS A LAWFULLY
ESTABLISHED LOT OR PARCEL, AS DEFINED IN ORS 92.010 OR '215.010, TO VERIFY THE APPROVED
USES OF THE LOT OR PARCEL, TO DITERMINE ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR
FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930 AND TO INQUIRE ABOlfT THE RIGHTS OF
NEIGHBORING PROPER1Y OWNERS, IF ANY, UNDER ORS 195.300, 195.301 AND 195.305 TO 195-336
AND SECTIONS 5 TO 11, OF CHAPTER 424, OREGON LAWS 2007.
Dated this \ lP day of ",Ja./l\-.- . 20lS.
STATE OF Oregon ~
1\ I 55.
County of "\:eRe V'- )
This instrument was acknowledged before me on this U day of W ~ AM r. 20 ~
:;:, -, ,.~. ~ ,~'"~, ~ &"~, 0.'''', LC~'OO Urn"" "_ "oijiiY, PO ..." "
I ~ NOTARY PUBUC-OREGON '. M} comm. is 'on expire' \ '1'0\ l
I ~ COMMISSION NO. 418475 I
I MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JULY 21, 2011 ,
--------,.~.-" ..'-"-~ ~..----
Page 2 of 3
Dat@Received:
MAR i j 2009
\
,
Original Submittal
-. .
.~
,
APN:0122273
Statutory Warranty Deed
. continued
FileNo,: 7075-1006298 (KE)
Dale' 01/15/2008
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
BEGINNING AT A POINT 1970.23 FEET EAST AND 901 FEET SOUTH OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF
THE LUCINDA COMEGYS DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 81 IN TOWNSHIP 17 SOUTH, RANGE 2 WEST OF
THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN; RUNNING THENCE SOUTH 140 FEET; THENCE EAST 172.87 FEET TO THE
WEST UNE OF 39TH STREET; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE WEST UNE OF 39TH STREET 140 FEET;
THENCE WEST 172.87 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, IN LANE COUNTY, OREGON.
[ji!:lt~ ~eeijlveel:
MAR 1 I 2009
Page 3 of 3
Original Submittal
~..~~
"~
First American
First American Title Insurance Company of Oregon
600 Country Club Road
Eugene, OR 97401 .
Phn . (541)484-2900
Fax - (541)484-7321
FOR ALL OUESTIONS REGARDING THIS PRELIMINARY REPORT. PLEASE CONTACT:
Jan Anderson, Title Officer
Phone: (541)484-2900 - Fax: (541)484-7321 - Email: jananderson@firstam.com
Randy McDougall
244 39th Street
Springfield, OR 97478
Order No.: 7199-1365210
March 06, 2009
Attn:
Phone No.: (541)726'6645 - Fax No.:
Email:
Re:
r.
l
r
Dat€l ReeEilved:
MAR 1 1 2009
1
~
:\
Preliminary Title Report
Original Submittal
AL TA Owners Standard Coverage "Liability $ Premium $
AL TA Owners Extended Coverage Liability $ Premium $
At TA.tenders Standard Coverage Liability $ Premium $
AL TA Lenders Extended Coverage liability $ Premium $
Endorsement Premium $
Govt Service Charge Cost $
Other Report Only / No Policy to be issued Cost $ 200,00
We are prepared to issue Title Insurance Policy or Policies "in the form and amount shown above, insuring
title to the following described land:
The land referred to in this report is described in Exhibit A attached hereto.
and as of February 26, 2009 at 8:00 a.m., title vested in:
Randy 5. McDougall
Subject to the exceptions, exclusions, and stipulations which are ordinarily part of such Policy form and
the following:
1. Taxes or assessments which'are not shown as existing liens by the, records of any taxing
authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records; proceedings
by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such
proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records.
2. Facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be
ascertained by an inspection of the land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof.
This report is for the exclusive use of the parties herein shown and is preliminary to the issuance of a
title insurance policy and shall. become void unless a policy is issued, and. the full premium.paid.
.~ ~~Preliminary Report
Order No.: 7199-1365210
Page 2 of 5
3. Easements, or claims or easement, not shown by the public records; reservations or exceptions
in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; water rights, claims or title to water.
4. Discrepancies; conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments or other facts which a
correct survey would disclose.
5. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, material, equipment rental or workers
compensation heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public
records. .
The exceptions to coverage 1-5 inclusive as set forth above will remain on any subsequently
issued Standard Coverage Title Insurance Policy.
In order to remove these exceptions to coverage in the issuance of an Extended Coverage
Policy the following items are required to be furnished to the Company; additional
exceptions to coverage may be added upon review of such information:
A. Surveyor alternative acceptable to the company
B. Affidavit regarding possession .
C. Proof that there is no new construction or remodeling of any improvement located on
the premises. In the event of new construction or remodeling the following is
required:
i. Satisfactory evidence that no construction liens will be flied; or
ii. Adequate security to protect against actual or potential construction liens;
Iii. Payment of additional premiums as required by the Industry Rate Filing
approved by the Insurance Division of the State of Oregon
6.
Taxes for the year 2008-2009
Tax Amou nt
Unpaid Balance:
Code No.:
Map & Tax Lot No.:
Property ID No.:
$
$
01900
17-02-31-41'02000
0122273
3,104.83
3,104.83, plus interest and penalties, if any
7. The rights of the public in and to that portion of the premises herein described lying within the
, limits of streets, roads and highways.
8. Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein:
Recording Information: November 02, 1940 in Volume 207, Page 247
In Favor of: Mountain States Power Company, a Delaware corporation
For: Power line
9.
Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein:
Recording Information: March '12, 1963, Reception No. 2670
In Favor of: City of Springfield
For: Public utilities
Oat~ Reee"f@d~
MAH \ 1 2009
Aist American Title
. Original Submittal
~ ~Preliminary Report
10. Deea of Trust and the terms and conditions thereof.,
Order No.: 7199-1365210
Page 3 of 5
Grantor/Trustor:
Grantee/Beneficiary:
Trustee:
Amount:
Recorded:
Recording Information:
Randy S. McDougall
Northwest Community Credit Union
First American Title Insurance Company of Oregon
$202,500.00
January 29, 2008
2008-005098
11. Deed of Trust and the terms and conditions thereof.
Grantor/Trustor:
Grantee/Beneficiary:
Trustee:
Amount:
Recorded:
Recording Information:
Randy S. McDougall,
Brunner Capital, LLC, an Oregon Limited Liability Company
Michael], Martinis, a licensed Oregon attorney
$30,000.00
January 29, 2008
2008-005099
- END OF EXCEPTIONS -
Situs Address as disclosed on Lane County Tax Roll:
244 39th Street, Springfield, OR 97478
THANK YOU FOR CHOOSING FIRST AMERICAN TITLE!
WE KNOW YOU HAVE A CHOICE!
Firs~ American Title
Date Received:
MA'i~ \ \ 2~09
Original subm\Ui:ll
'f-,.
.'.,
"
. Preliminary Report
Order No.: 7199-1365210
Page 4 of 5
::~
.. 4.
~ .
First American Title Insurance Company of Oregon
SCHEDULE OF EXCLUSIONS FROM COYERAGE
ALTA LOAN POLICY (06/17/06)
The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees, or
expenses that arise by reason of:. .
1. {a} Any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental ,regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting, or
relating to
(i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land;
(ii) the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement erected on the land;
(iii) the subdivision of land; or
(iv) environmental. protection;
or the effect of any violation of these laws; ordinances, or governmental regulations. This Exclusion l(a) does not modify or limit the coverage
provided under Covered Risk S.
(b) Any governmental police power. This Exclusion l{b) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 6.
2. Rights of eminent domain. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7 or 8.
3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters
(a) created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the InsuredClaima'nt; "
(b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not disclosed in writing to
the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy;
(c) resulting in no loss or damage totheInsured Claimant;
(d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (however, this does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 11, 13, or 14);
or
(e) resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if the Insured Claimant had paid value for the Insured Mortgage.
4. Uilenforceability of the lien of. the Insured Mortgage because of the inability or failure of an Insured to compiy with applicable doing-business laws of the
state where the Land is situated.
5. Invalidity or unenforceability in whole or in part of the lien of the Insured Mortgage that arises out of the transaction evidenced by the Insured Mortgage
and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth-in-lending law.
6. Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that the transaction creating the lien of the
Insured Mortgagej is
(a) a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer, or
(b) a preferential transfer for any reason not stated:in Covered Risk 13(b) of this policy.
7. Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed by governmental authority and created or attaching between Date of Policy and the
date of recording of the Insured Mortgage in the Public Records. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided. under Covered Risk 11(b).
ALTA OWNER'S POLICY (06/17/06)
The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees, or
expenses that arise by reason of:
1. (a) Any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting, or
relating to
(i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land;
(ii) the character, dimensions, or location of any imprr;Jvement erected on the Land;
(iii) the subdivision of land; or
(iv) environmental protection;
or the effect of any violation of these Jaws, ordinances, or governmental regulations. This Exclusion l(a) does not modify or limit the coverage prOVided
under Covered Risk 5.
(b) Any governmental police power~ This Exclusion l(b) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 6.
2: Rights of eminent domain. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7 or 8.
3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters .
(a) created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant;
(b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not disclosed in writing to
the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became a'n Insured under this policy;
(e) resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant;
(d) attaching or created subsequent toDate of Policy (however, this does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risks 9 and 10); or
(e) resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if the Insured Claimant had paid value for the Title.
4. Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bank"ruptcy; state insolvency, or similar creditors'rights laws, that the transaction vesting the Title as
shown in Schedule A, is .
(a) a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or
(b) a preferential transfer for any reason not stated in Covered Risk 9 of this policy.
5. Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or asses'sriientS imposed by governmental' authority and created or attaching between Date of Policy and the
date of recording of the deed or other instrument of transfer in the Public Records that vests Title as shown in Scnedule A.
1.
SCHEDULE OF STANDARD EXCEPTIONS
Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any tax.lng authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or
by the public records; proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown
by the records of such agency or by the publiC records.
Facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the publiC records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the land or by making
inquiry of persons in possession thereof.
Easements, or claims o(easement, n(ltshown by the publiC records; reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof;
water rights, claims or title to water.
Any encroachment (of existing improvements located on the subject land onto adjoining land or of existing improvements
located on adjoining land.onto the subject land), encumbrance, violation, variation, aT-adverse circumstance affecting the title
that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the subject land.
Any lien" or right to a lien, for services, labor,material, equipment rental or workers compensation heretofore or hereafter
furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records.
2,
3.
4,
5.
NOTE: A SPECIMEN COPY OF THE POllCY FORM (OR FORMS) WILL BE FURNISHED UPON REQUEST
Ualli:l i1rl~li'V.I;:22nl8'J:
liA"1
~.. f\
1 2009
first Amen'can Title
Original SubmittF'\
. . Preliminary Report
.
Order No,; 7199-1365210
Page 5 of 5
Exhibit "A"
Real 'property in the County of Lane, State of Oregon, described as follows:
BEGINNING AT A.POINT 1970.23 FEET EAST AND 901 FEET SOlJTH OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF
THE LUCINDA COMEGYS DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 81 IN TOWNSHIP 17 SOUTH, RANGE 2 WEST OF
THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN; RUNNING THENCE SOlJTH 140 FEET; THENCE EAST 172.87 FEET TO THE
WEST UNE OF39TH STREET; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE WEST UNE OF 39TH STREET 140 FEET;
THENCE WEST 172.87 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, IN LANE COUNTY, OREGON,
NOTE: This legal description was created prior to January 01, 2008.
Tax Parcel Number: 0122273
j
Date Received: ,
MAR 1 I 2009
Original Submittal
Hrst American Title
ESSMENT
\XATION
lLY
~IlXU04ArE I
T~. r:oRl'E:~
o'EI/!GW'~ 01' I
~ JU.C ar ~ .
~
.
~
,
1900
.
L"A~7
"'''.S8'
1801
.
.
!
~
.-I; ;'
,"4" I
,
~~
NE1/4 SE1/4
SEC.
LANE
31 T.17S.
COUNTY
R.2W.
W.M.
"l'C
(8)
::>
<<D
<U
Q)
ft!:
(1);
-'
m
t:::),.
1I1.ac:>..z......e>.W-24.36.
, "" N" _ 5.8'-4" '47"E'.
. ~'.-44-' Wl!.(I'"'......'t fJa09" 65.00' ""fal.t:JOJr
..... J' -Wii ,~~~, 8200.
en a 7700 ,~., ~ ,.",:' ~ .
INITIAC & 0.1tJI\B.I ~ ,;"~._ 12-~.~ ' ;!~81aq, ~ 8000 i 7900 'S780[
POINT' ~'i1~ -::: '!ll -t-ll .. ~ ~ ...~~ - ~ ~
~ ~oa,o' ~- 8300" '"" ,.., ";.0;3 14 15 ,16
.~ ~ 7600'OJ. 's" ;~;~~.,_9'" . zra. "",00' "'1.00' ~3.(')
~~ O.14*:Pj 11".... 'o~. s.tUt_'+7"fi.
,;' ~02 , ~-;;::;;'-~. ~ NORTH "B" STREEl
~ '0"'.0" .. ~ i.C" 3'7.,~'
~ 7500 .,s ;:"'...----
is 0.14 ~''<''i ; 8400
~! ~ ~ ,/ .~., 'f;
h 740'0 ~', ~~ 1~,.., 85oo~~~'" (/3600 'g8700
1;0. O.14tt. ,S ~ ~!'\"JtO' ~~;2~f:.g
. ..~~$ , ~ ~'~. 8 - 7
'='2(00.0' .; P
c.o.O"l' _ ;p,~ ~ ,::$0_ q'l _, _ 7o.-x>' _"0.00' _bO 0"
ill r\n.i ~ "rJi ~A\ -.- QIO...... m__ r..:o.o' 5 re-:;;'-.~':"'4.i.
~yY".9900' .' ,....... ~tPI-A'T)
~ ~ ~ 9007 ~ 9006",9005 '9004 9003' 9002 , 90C
~7300~ ,JU5AC :0.14 AC ~.14 Ac.8,o.14 AC~O,14 K- ~.14 AC lP.14,
0.155 AC.,& ~\1Q 309~~' ~O ~ 32~~~ 33~t 34 ~O~
\ ~~o"\' 'I~ "i.o_~ ~'_~' 6.0.0' __ ~O" ~t ~~,~ ~
I.J'~~"W<;.KA'T;- ~~.
SCALE 1. = 100'
/9~.3B -
n&,137'
/"2/~.,,.'1!.('P0I:S,
. -~,JI' '.<>f'~W C~y.Ift~.v.:6-'
-1 ,...... ,.".~
4D' 1100
,...-
\' '
. 24-e9
~
-200o-~--~ ~
(f) ".
,
\ -1 ~
~ '
.
~
.
/1'2.lJ?~
/~38'
,
.<
ij
\ ('''''''. 's .,
" .s.Li~ D.~I
. rc.o'
+
. l
'.
,
"
,
I-
.~
w
17..;38"
1001
"
. II>
~
~
1200
.11~.j!:>'
.1000
~
,~
1300
...".- --asr-.'~.3~ '" -to
"
. ,
01 cg)~()()
1700
~,
.,
-,
.
,
,
___O:\!.
,
4'
1601
.,}
'0
~
II'I,\'I'\,.L ''''Ill;
. ~ .e;.ey.",,~'~OH.!. Z2.7'. O'
.. " 403'" uU 46;T I
. I 0.28 AE.. _ O,2~ Ad I
~ ""I'^^ ...
THIS MAP IS PROVIDED AS A COURTESY 7 , I
BY FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURA,'JCE
COMPANY OF OREGON TO ASSIST IN
LOCATING SAID PREMISES AND THE
COMPANY ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR
ITS ACCURACY OR FOR MATTERS THAT
MAY BE DISCLOSED BY A SURVEY,
..
,
e . .goo.
,,~
800
t
r~._I~'
/v.4'!1-S~'~
'7.....
SEE MAP 17 02 31 14
~.
"31.IS'
___ SEE INSET
'" :;1 4O~"'O
en
$2
.,.....
a.
-
-
'E
n
OJ
(f)
m
.5
Cl
.;::
o
1400
0.63 AC.
,
~
..
IL
I r ~
I
=
~.J::
~
~" "3~DO
N.CI'l-"I'4'47"l'\f.
c.,.Qoo' - (;,0.-00'
..0."':;
%8800
'"
Q
',890'
,
'"
~
6
5
~l'~'O
0"
""
300
-...-..---