Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNotes, Work PLANNER 1/9/2009 , /. TYPE II TENTATIVE LAND DIVISION, PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Project Name: Vern Benson Subdivision ("5 Doves Estates") '- Project Proposal: 5 Lot Residential Subdivision Case Number: PRE2008-00076 Project Address: 5642 A Street Assessors Map an" Tax Lot Number(s): Map 17-02-33-41, TL.1704 Zonin~: Low Density Residential (LDR) Overlay District(s): Applicable Refinement Plan: Refinement Plan Designation: Metro Plan Designation: Low Density Residential (LDR) Pre-Submittal Meeting Date: January 9, 2009 Application Submittal Deadline: July 8, 2009 Associated Applications: None 1Iem-&Yl$FJseRIN(;lilEePlQI;VEI.!$RM'EljlifIiREVIEWiinEAJMJlilIIiII!iIIII~'~ r POSITION .1 REVIEW OF I NAME PHONE l 1 Proiect Planner 1 Land Use Planning . Andv Limbird 726-3784 I I Transportation Planninq Enqineer 1 Transportation 1 Jon Driscoll 726-3679 1 I Public Works Civil Engineer 1 Utilities 1 Clayton McEachern 736-1036 I I Public WorksCivil Engineer 1 Sanitary & Storm Sewer Clayton McEachern 736-1036 1 1 Deputy Fire Marshal 1 Fire and Life Safety Gilbert Gordon 726-2293 I 1 Community Services Manager 1 Buildinq Dave Puent 726-3668 I rAJRRl!IGAJljlif"'''J5vJ;vEI.!{)eMEt.liTi.RE~EWiitEAJM~""o ....0".. W Applicant Engineer Vern Benson . Todd Powell 940 Hwy 99 North HBA Design Group Eugene, OR 97402 150 7th Street . Springfield, OR 97477 ..... Revised 9/24/07 Oat€! Received:-A/,1Oo]' Planner: AL TENTATIVE LAND DIVISION APPLICATION PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST PLANNING o Application Fee discuss the applicable fees o One additional copy of the Land Division Plan reduced to 81h"x 11" Complete ~.' ~ . Incomplete See Planning Note(s) ~, 8 y," x 11" Copy of Land Division Plan o Copy of the deed and a preliminary title report issued within the past 60'days documenting ownership and listing all encumbrances. If the applicant is not the property owner, written permission from the property owner is required. Complete See Planning Note(s) 1 Incomplete ~ I.22i] IIJ o Tentative Land Division Plan Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) See Comments .~ IIJ ~ ~ IIJ , See Comments See Comments ~ I<:a:;J ~ ~ ~ I<:a:;J ~ l2::SJ ~ See Comments 1/8/09 Deed and Preliminary Title Report Prepared by an Oregon Licensed Land Surveyor in accordance with ORS 92 All existing and proposed easements Dimensions and size of each parcel and the approximate dimensions of each building site indicating the top and toe of cut and fill slopes to scale Location, widths and names of all existing and prqposed streets, alleys, dedications or other right-of-ways within or adjacent to the proposed land division Location of existing and required traffic control devices, fire hydrants, power poles, transformers, neighborhood mailbox units and similar public facilities Location and width of all existing and proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways and bike trails Location, size and type of plantings and street trees in any required planter strip Oat€! Received:-41 p2tit"f Planner: AL 2 !il ~ 2 Location and size of existing and proposed utilities on and adjacent to the site including sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power,' gas, telephone, and cable TV. Indicate the proposed connection points. o Phased Development Plan required if redivision is proposed. The plan must include the boundaries and sequencing of each proposed redivision. Any redivision must progress in a sequence promoting street connectivity between the various phases of the development and accommodating other required public improvements. Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) ~ Phased Development Plan , IW Planning Notes: 1. Please provide a copy of the Improvement Agreements recorded against the property (documents #93-35034 and #93-80724) with the application submittal. 2. Show and describe how each proposed lot is to be served with underground electrical, cable television and telephone lines. \ Additional comments no~ related to the completeness of the application: o Please ensure the tentative subdivision plan is reproduced at the same 24"x36" size and is bound with the plan set. o If utility connections are proposed at the existing power pole at the northwest edge of the site, additional utility easements may be required. Any required utility easements shall be depicted on the tentative subdivision plan, All utilities will have to be installed to the building envelope area prior to final plat. o A new or updated Improvement Agreement may be required for the A Street frontage. o Provide a draft copy of the Joint Access, Maintenance and Utility Easement for Lots 2-5 with the subdivision submittal. Additionally, details on maintenance of the bioswale shall be included in the easement document. '0 The existing house and garage are proposed to be removed; therefore, please remove the building footprint line work from the tentative subdivision plan. Actual structure will have to be removed prior to final plat. o The existing chain link fence along the south property line (A Street frontage) appears to exceed the maximum 4-foot height limit for a residential front yard, The fence will have to be removed or reduced in height to meet the requirements of SDC 4.4-115. o On the tentative plan, indicate any existing trees that are proposed to be removed. o Clarify text note for "Proposed Cluster Mailbox Unit" shown on Lot 2, Sheet C2.0 (error?). o At least two existing street trees may have to be removed or replaced to accommodate the proposed joint access driveway. An additional street tree will be required for Lot 1. o The joint access driveway serving Lots 2-5 must be paved prior to final plat. o All existing and proposed utilities to serve the development area must be placed underground., ' o Show or describe the distance from the southeast corner of the property to the nearest fire hydrant near 57th & A Street. ' o The develop'er will have to demonstrate compliance with the Solar Access provisions of SDC 3.2-225 during Building Permit review. 1/8/09 Oat€! Received:~/;.wf , Planner: AL 3 LAND DIVISION TENTATIVE PLAN APPLICATION PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Engineer: Clayton McEachern Case#: pre2008-00076 PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING o Site Assessment of Existing Conditions Complete Incomplete See PW Note( s) ~ f,'5?I ~ ~ lil I0i%1 1.2sfJ Prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect or Engineer Vicinity Map The name, location, and dimensions of all existing site features including buildings, curb cuts, trees, and impervious surface areas, clearly indicating what is remaining and what is being removed. For existing structures to remain, also indicate present use and required setbacks from proposed property lines The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and top of bank'of all watercourses and required riparian setback that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map on file in the Development Services Department , The 100-year floodplain and floodway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment or Letter of Map Revision The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3-200 and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file in the Development Services Department Physical features including, but not limited to trees 5" in diameter or greater when measured 4 V2 feet above the ground,' significant clusters oftrees and shrubs, riparian areas, wetlands and rock outcroppings Soil types and water table information as mapped and specified in the Soils Survey of Lane County. A Geotechnical Report prepared by an Engineer must be submitted concurrently if the Soils Survey indicates the proposed development area has unstable soils and/or a hi~h water table ~ ~. lil ~ ~ lil" ','~' . ..~.. . ~ I0i%1 ~ ~ lil Revised 10/25/07 Date Received: /;/),109 Planner: AL o Land Division Tentative Plan Complete Incomplete See PW Note(s) ~ I0i%1 ~ 10i%1,"".,.",., , J.Jlifd ~ 1 Prepared by an Oregon licensed Land Surveyor in accordance with ORS 92 Location and width. of all existing and proposed easements on and abutting the property Boundaries of the entire area owned by the property owner, of which the proposed land division is a part, as well as dimensions and size of each parcel. and the approximate dimensions of each building site indicating the top and toe of cut and fill slopes to scale Location of existing and required power poles, transformers, neighborhood mailbox units, and similar public facilities . Location and size of existing and proposed utilities on and adjacent to the site including sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV. Indicate the proposed connection points . ~ !il ~ 3 10i%1, ~ ~ 1 o Stormwater Management Plan Complete Incomplete See PW Note(s) ~ !il !il ~ 2 Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer Planting plan prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect where plants are proposed as part of the stormwatermanagement system Roof drainage patterns and discharge locations Pervious and impervious area drainage patterns The size and location of stormwater management systems components, including but not limited to: drain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention ponds; stormwater quality measures; and natural drainageways to be retained ~ ~ ~ Ii) ~ !il Existing and proposed spot elevations and contours lines drawn at 1 foot intervals (for land with a slope over 10 percent, the contour lines may be at 5 foot intervals) Amount of proposed cut and fill ~ f,'5?I,: t.=l o Stormwater Management System Study - provide four (4) copies of the study' with the completed Stormwater Scoping Sheet attached. The plan, calculations, and Oat€! Received' 1/'1/ :upf , ( Revised 10/25/07 Planner: AL . . documentation must be consistent with the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual. Complete Incomplete See PW Note(s) ~ ~ Scoping Sheet and attached Stormwater Management System Study PW Notes: 1. The note for the mailbox locations appears to be misplaced. No locations shown for power distributions for each parcel. No other dry utilities labeled or hookup locations shown. 2. A specific planting plan for the bioswale needs to be prepared listing plants per the City of Portland Stormwater Management Manual 3. Land division map needs bearings on all property lines Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application: '0 This parcel currently has a development agreement for curb, gutter, sidewalk, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, street lighting, and streets trees. As the opposite side of North A street has 2/3 improvements in place, this development appears to fall under this agreement and as such these improvements should be undertaken has part of this development. This will require a Public Improvement Permit for the full width improvement along the frontage of this lot. Revised 10/2S/07 . Oat€! Received:-tflJoo7 Planner: AL LAND DIVISIONTENlTATIVE PLAN APPLICATION ,PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST, Transportation Engineer/Planner: Jon Driscoll Case#: PRE2008-00076 Applicant: 5 Doves EstatesnVern Benson TRANSPORTATION f o Right-of-Way Approach Permit application must be provided where the property has frontage on a Lane County or an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) facility. Complete Incomplete See Transportation Note(s) ~ Copy of ROW Approach Permit Application ~ o Traffic Impact Study - four (4) copies of a study prepared by a Traffic Engineer in accordance with SDc 4.2-105 A,4., Traffic Impact Studies (TIS) allow the City to analyze and evaluate the traffic impacts and mitigation of a development on the City's transportation system.' In general, a TIS must explain how the traffic from a given development affects the transportation system in terms of safety, traffic operations, access and mobility, and immediate and adjoining street systems. A TIS must also 'address, if needed, City, Metro Plan and state land use and transportation policies and objectives. Complete Incomplete See Transportation Note(s) ~ IIJ Traffic Impact Study o Land Division Tentative Plan Complete Incomplete See Trpnsportation Note(s) I!jI ~ Revised 10/25/07 DatEi"iri~J;i~ed: ~/~/,/alf Planner: AL Location of existing and proposed street lighting, including type, height, and area of illumination Location of existing and proposed transit' facilities ' Location and dimensions of existing and proposed driveways , Location and width of all existing and proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways, and bike trails Location, widths, conditions, and names of all existing and proposed streets, alleys, dedications, access easements or other' right-of-ways within or adjacent to the proposed land division, Proposed streets should also include approximate radius of curves and grades and relationship to any ~ !il ~ ~ !il ~ 1 . fS1, l3!!!l '~ 2,3 "," -..... JS}::f>..' ~ ~ Ii;i;1 ~ projected streets as shown on the Metro Plan, TransPlan, Conceptual Development ~Ian, or Conceptual Local Street Map Location of existing and required traffic control devices Transportation Notes: 1. The sidewalk along the frontage is required and needs to be shown, (See # 2. Full street improvements (36' paved) with sidewalk, curb and gutter will need to be added in keeping with SDC 4.2-105 (GYG-):(?>) 3. Show the dimensons for the street ROW along G St and for its existing paving. 4. Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application: o Proposed driveways will need to meet Code requirements (e.g" and wings be contained within the extended property/easement lines,) o The access easment needs to be labeled irrevocable. 'Revised 10/25/07 , Oate Recelved:~I2.0 oq Planner: AL .. . ~ 'r:"_.~.:\j~4' , <. t .. .;q . .,/ ~ ~ fii1 ~ projected streets as shown on the Metro Plan, TransPlan, Conceptual Development Plan, or Conceptual Local Street Map Location of existing and required traffic control devices Transportation Notes: 1. The sidewalk along the frontage is required and needs to be shown, (See # 2. Full street improvements (36' paved) with sidewalk, curb and gutter will need to be addea in keeping with SDc 4.2-105 (G)(?)6:>) 3. Show the dimensons for the street ROW along G St and for its existing paving. 4. Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application: o Proposed driveways will need to meet Code requirements (e,g" and wings be contained within the extended property/easement lines,) o The access easment needs to be iabeled irrevocable, Revised 10/25/07 Oate 1!16ceived:-4/.z.,of Planner: AL , TENTATIVE LAND DIVISION APPLICATION 'PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECK~IST Deputy Fire Marshal: Gilbert Gordon' , Case #: PRE2008-00076 FIRE . , o Tentative Land Division Plan . Complete Incomplete See Fire Note( s) ~ ~"" $!A" _At. Locatio'n, widths 'and names of all existing and proposed streets, alleys, dedications or other right-of- ,!,ays within or adjacent to the proposed I~lnd division Location of existing and required fire hydrants ~!il Fire Notes: 1. Additional comments not related to the complete'Jess of the application: o Fire apparatus access roads shall be a minimum of 20 feet in clear width (2007 Springfield Fire Code 503.2.1) and capable of supporting an 80,000 lb. imposed' load (SFC 503.2.3 and SFC Appendix D102.1). The cross section of the driveway shown on Plan Sheet C2.0 is less than 20 feet with a further restriction of 18 feet due to the extcuded curb. , .')Nu ?~L'j -Fire-Lv..:' ~/JY74J"- ....e,J;:.-eJ Revised 9/24/07 Date Received: Ih~;, Planner: AL ' J '/" ANY REQUIRED ADDITIONAL MATERIALS, APPLICATIONS OR PERMITS IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL STANDARDS OR APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE APPLICANT SHOULD CONSIDER UTILIZING EITHER THE DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING OR THE PRE- APPLICATION REPORT FOR MORE DETAILED INFORMATION: Applicable Not Applicable ~ IiiliI ~ , Proposed deed restrictions and a draft of,any Homeowner's Association Agreement Additional plans and documentation for submittal of a clus~er Subdivision proposal as specified in SDC 3.2-230 Riparian Area Protection Report For properties located within 150 feet of the top of bank of any' Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WQLW) or within 100 feet of the top of bank of any direct tributaries of WQLW ' A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be submitted concurrently if there are unstable soils and/or a high water table present Where the development area is within an overlay district' applicable, address the additional standards of the overlay district If five or more trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling Permit as specified in SDC 5.19-100 A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon Division of State Lands must be submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the property Any required federal or state permit must be submitted 'concurrently or evidence the permit application has been submitted for review Where any grading, filling or excavating is proposed with the development, a Land and Drainage Alteration permit must be submitted prior to development Where applicable, any Discretionary Use or Variance as specified in SDC 5.9-100 and 5.21-100 IIJ ~ N/i1 ~ IiiliI l!eJ Ii] ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f,'5?I ~ !il'~. ''''',;' iE'^). ~ ~ I0i%1 l.=.J !il ~ J , Oattl Received:.f Planner: AL 4 1/8/09 " THIS APPLICATION IS: o COMPLETE FOR PROCESSING ~ INCOMPLETE AND NEEDS MISSING INFORMATION NOTED ABOVE tL4 ' a/ /'l/.h?&9 'Date This is not a decision on your application. Springfield Development Code Section 5.4- 105 and Oregon Revised Statutes 227.178 require the City take final action on a limited land use decision within 120 days after the application is deemed complete. The 120-day processing period for this application begins when all the missing information is submitted or when you request that the City proceed without the information. You must indicate by either signing this form or by submitting a written response to the City within seven days of the date of this form asserting your intentions regarding the provision of the missing information. If you indicate herein or in your written response that the missing information will be submitted, then you have 180 days from the date the application was submitted for Pre- Submittal Review to provide the City with the missing information. If you refuse to submit the missing information, then upon receipt of the full application packet and processing fee, the City will deem the application complete for purposes of starting the 120-day clock and begin processing the application. No new information may be submitted after the start of the 120-day period unless accompanied by a request for an extension of the 120"day processing time. Upon receipt of a request for extension, the City may extend the 120-day period for a reasonable period of time. The City may also require additional fees if the new information is submitted after the Notification to Surrounding Property Owners is sent out and a second notification is required or if the new information substantially affects the application proposal and additional review is required. ' I, the owner/applicant, intend to submit all missing items indicated herein to the City within the ISO-day timeline,. ' ~//~. Ownerf Applicant's Sigw.fture - J '. . . Oat€! Received: / /" / )#P'1 Planner: AL ~ 1/8/09 5