The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutApplication APPLICANT 8/2/2007 I ,I I I I' I I *' , II I ,I; I' I I I , I I City of Springfield Development Services Department 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Site Plan Modification, (Minor) Type I '" Application To Be Modified Case Number DRC2005-00029 '. . Applicant Name: Company: Address: Williams Bakery 340 NE 11th Ave., Portland, OR 97232 APplicant;~ 'R~~.; r w~~r-;~;~~o~~en --- . ... ...-'- -. . Company: PNE Corporation Address: 1081 Columbia Blvd., Longview, WA 98632 p;operty ~wn~;;r ---- - .-. - -. -----.- Company: I United States Bakery Address: I 340 NE 11th Ave., Portland, OR 97232 .- -...-.' --1-.--.-.------ I Phone: 360.703.0444 IFax: I 360.578.3944 I I -j I I IPh~;;~:l IFax: I 503 _ 731. 5670 I -. -.. ---..-. 0-' __._~......--.J', TAX LOT NO(s): tji/JO/ g.DOI(3~~ 18-03-0'3-12- -n.. 700 c_ i" Acres ~ Square Feet D ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 18.03-03-11 Property Address: 2000 Nugget Way Size of Property: 14 F'.r::~p~s~.d.~~I1!.~of F'!oject: Williams Bakery Fuel Station Description of Proposal: Project consists of adding a new fueling facility to a recently approved and constructed site. This new fueling facility will only be for use bv Williams Bakerv delivery trucks. # of Lots/Parcels: Avg. Lot/Parcel Size: sf Density: ~ew Imp~ryio",~ .Surfi!.~e__Co'y~r~ge:_ 885 sf_~I.!Ig. Gr.oss Flo().r Area: -- - - ~.- dujacre sf Required Property Infor' (City Intake Staff: complete this section) Overlay District: Plan Designation: Urban Growth Boundary 0 Zoning: Applicable Refinement Plan: Location: City Limits 0 ~ssoc:iated AppJicatjon!: .- -- -- - ---,._. Pre-Submittal Case No.: _ _"' p~te: I t Case No.: OR.JdD[J-~e: ~P-/ 0 r Application Fee: $ I J,05 Technical Fee: $ r.,b. ~ s J"Q:r.ALfEE~~ _, $ l~ "'5,:1.5 12-8-2006 Brenda Jones Reviewed by: Reviewed by: Postage Fee: :l ttfAL $ I I II ,I I I I I '. I I " I I I I I I I I I 30 07 04:18p 07-30-'07 11:28 FRO~- p.9 T-B66 P004/0Jl f-~ll 23-2272944 I represent this application to be complete for submittal to the City, Consistent with the completeness check performed on this application at the Pre-Submittal Meeting, I affirm the inrormalion Identified by the City as necessary for processing the application is provided herein or the information will not be provided if not otl1erwise contained within the submittal. and the aty may begin processing the application with the information as submitted. This statement serves as written notice pursuant to the requirements of ORS 227.178 pertaining to a complete application Owner: ;1A-,.IV\.NV\.<."';:: 1/Vl ~ Signature l.) ~V'f\.~v1 f0GRe N:) Print \ 1- 30 r o--:r Date: 12.8-2006 Brenda Jones II I I I I' I I I I I. I I, I. I I ,I I ,t I 30 07 04: l8p 07-~0-.07 11:28 FRO~- p. 10 i-'ldld:.:s/~l] r-~lJ 23-2272944 T-obb Steps in the Process: 1. The Applicant Submits a Pre-Submittal Meeting Application The Pre-Submittal Application is mandatory. Please refer to the Springfield fee Schedule for the Pre-Submittal Application fee. The submittal package must .conform to the application completeness checklist attached to this form. Xou are required to submit nine (9) copies of the submittal requirements packet for pre-submittal review. Pre- submittal meetings will be conducted every Tuesday and Friday between 10:00 am and noon, We will strive to conduct the Pre-Submittal meeting within five to seven worKing days of receiving the application. 2. Applicant and the City conduct the Pre-Submittal Meeting We strongly encourllge you, the owner and design team to attend the Pre-Submittal meeting, The meeting will be held with representatives from Public Worl<s Engineering and Transportlltion, Community Services (Building), Fire Marshall's office, and the Planning Division. The meeting will be scheduled for 30 to 60 minutes, The Planner will provide you with II Pre-Submittal Checklist at the end of the meeting specifYing the items required to make the application complete-if it isn't already complete. You will then have 180 days to make the application complete for submittal and acceptance by the City. 3. Applicant Submits a Complete Application When you have addressed all of the items on the Pre-Submittal Checklist, please submit eighteen (18) copies of the complete application to the City. A fee will be collected at that tlme and the 120 day calendar review period will begin, When the Planner has prepared a draft land use decision, the draft will be mailed/faxed to the applicant/owner/design team for their review. At the applicant's request, the planner will schedule a meeting ta review the draft with appropriate staff if certain issues need resolution before the final land use decision Is issued. Owner's Signature This application will be used for both the required Pre-Submittal Meeting and subsequent complete application submittal. Owner's signatures are required at both stages in the application process. An application without the Owners signature will not be a........... ~...d. ' The undersigned acknowledges that the information in this application is correct and accurate for scheduling of the Pre-Submittal Meeting. Owner: ~JVYJ.I^-~ Signature 0 Date: -=+--3Dr Ot- ~Q.V'(\.VV\....( \('{'m ~ 8hf) Print \ 12.8.2006 Brc:nda Jones .....t) 225 Fifth Street Springfield, Oregon 97477 541-726-3759 Phone Job/Journal Number DRC2007-00052 DRC2007-00052 Payments: Type of Payment Check cRcccinl1 RECEIPT #: Description CTY Site Plan - Minor Mod + 5% Technology Fee Paid By PACIFIC NORTHERN ENVIRON ~ GLJ~~~.I..ELO -~ .... ...,:. '... 8iL- -~ . .i . . _____-c...._=c~ _, ,,:",'.-" - C,. of Springfield Official Receipt D~. dopment Services Department Public Works Department. 2200700000000001226 2:05:24PM Datc: 08/02/2007 Item Total: Check Number Authorization Received By Batch Number Number How Received Amount Due' 1,205.00 60.25 $1,265.25 Amount Paid emm 7751 $1,265.25 In Person Payment Total: $1,265.25 Page 1 of 1 8/2/2007 . :~'"""..." '- ~'.;;W'1'"._~.."!-. -. '.. ~"r'" ~Ianning .solutions ~nc. I Architecture Iterior Architecture andscape Architecture Land Use Planning IraPhiC Arts Development Consulting lerlified Arborist nvironmental Planning iUbliC Involvement I I I I laniel G. George. LA anaging Principal A 831, 10 16533 Christopher A. Baumann, LA linCiP3r and Director of ndscape Architecture , A 635, OR 354. CA 3434 'ark D. DiLoreto. AlA irectar of Architecture A 8809, OR 3086, 10 AR1657 _601 Broadway Street ancouver, WaShington 98663 hone: 360 750-9000 Fax: 360 750-9101 li@Ptanningsolulionsinc.com ww. planningsoluli cosine .com I Williams Bakery Fuel Station Type I Site Plan Modification City of Springfield Development Services ADDlicant: Williams Bakery Mr. Tomm~ Moreno 340 NE 111 Avenue Portland, OR 97232 503.731.5670 Contact: Mr. Chris Baumann 1601 Broadway Vancouver, WA 98663 360.750.9000 360.750.9201 Fax psi@plannin9solutionsinc.com I lanning "olutions 'nc. .rchitecture ~nterior Architecture .andscape Architecture land Use Planning Graphic Arts !Jevelopment Consulting ~ertified Arborist .nvironmental Planning I'ublic Involvement I I I I I Eanie' G. George, LA anaging Principal A 832. ID 18533 Christopher A. Baumann. LA ~rjnCIPal and Director of .andscape Architecture A 635, OR 354, CA 3434 lark D. Diloreto, AlA iretter of Architecture A 8809, OR 3086. ID AR2651 1601 Broadway Street lancouver I Washinglon 98663 Phone: 360 150-9000 Fa" 360150-9201 .51@planningSOlullonsinc.com rww. planningsolulionsinc.com I Williams Bakery Fuel Station Type I Site Plan Modification Table of Contents 1. Application Form 2. Stormwater Scoping Sheet 3. Narrative 4. Title Report 5. Geotechnical Investigation Attached Separately: 24" x 36" Plan Set I I I, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT I Engineering Division Phone: (541) 726-3753 Fax: (541) 736-1021 I I MARCH 5,2004 REQUIRED STORMWATER SCOPING SHEET USE POLICY: I I In October 2003, Springfield Public Works released a trial "stormwater scoping sheet," provided to help engineers and developers meet stormwater requirements in the Springfield Development Code (SDC) and Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual (EDSPM). After a five month trial period, it became apparent that users of the scoping sheet submitted much more complete applications than non-users. An added bonus was a decrease in the overall review time spent on the applications, resulting in quicker notice of decisions. As a result of the benefits of the scoping sheets, the City has decided to make their use a mandatory process. As of April 12, 2004, the use of storm water scoping sheets will be required for all applications which require development review. All applications submitted to the City shall provide four (4) copies ofa completed storm water scoping sheet with the application packet. Attached with this letter is the latest version of the scoping sheet, which refiects changes requested by the development community. I PLEASE NOTE: SUBMITTED APPLICATIONS WILL NOW BE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT A COMPLETED STORM WATER SCOPING SHEET, STORM WATER STUDY AND PLANS IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE SCOPE REQUIREMENTS DIRECTIONS FOR USING STORMWATER SCOPING SHEETS ARE AS FOLLOWS: I I J. Obtain scnping sheet frnm applicatinn packet, city website, or nther location 2. Fill out project information (top halfoffront sheet) prior to commencement of work on stormwater study (note: do not sign scoping sbeet until it is received from Ihe City with requiremenls checked). 3. Mail, fax, or email all pages 10: Cily of Springfield, Public Works Depl., Attn: Matt Slouder 4. Receive completed scoping sheet (filled out by the City) indicating minimum requirements for a complete stormwaler study 5. Include four (4) copies of complete scoping sheet (signed by engineer at the bottom of page 2), stormwater study and plans that comply with the minimum required scope with submittal of application packet. The scoping sheet shall be included as an attachmenl, inside Ihe fronl cover of Ihe slormwater sludy. I I I Stormwater scoping sheets can be found with all application packets (City website and the Public Works front counter) as well as on the Public Works webpage at either: www.cLsorin~field.or.us/Pubworks/whatsnew.htm or under the link for "fillable forms" at www.ci.sorin~field.or.us/Pubworks/Desi~nlslart.htm . Thank you in advance for working with the City of Springfield with this new process. Sincerely, I I I Matt Stouder, EIT City of Springfield, Public Works/Engineering Email: mstouder@cLspringfield.or.us Phone: (541) 736-1035 Fax: (541) 736-1021 I I 12.8-2006 Brenda Jones I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT / Engineering Division Fax: (541) 736-1021 STORMW A TER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SCOPE OF WORK -- (Area below this line filled out by Applicant) -- (Please return to Matt Stouder@Cit)'ofSp,ingfieltl Public Works Engineering; Fax # 736-1011. Phone # 736-1035.) - - I Project Name: Williams Bakery Assessors Parcel #: 18-03-03-11 Land Use(s): Project Size (Acres): 14 acres Approx. Impervious Area: 885 SF Applicant: Date: Phone #: Fax #: Email: Fuel Station PNE Corporation 8-1-07 360.703.0444 360.578.3944 marks@pnecorp.com - New Project Description (Include a copy of Assessor's map): Project consists of adding a new fueling facility to a recently approved and constructed site. This new fueling facility will only be for use by Williams Bakery delivery trucks. Drainage Proposal (Public connection(s), discharge location(s), etc. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary: Please see previously approved plans. Proposed Storm water Best Management Practices: Please see previously approved plans. I l__ - -=-7Area-below this line filled out bv the Cltv"';,d Returned to the Aoollcantl- (AI a minimum. all boxes checked by the City 011 the front and back of this sheel shall be submilled for an application 10 be complete for submit/al. allhough other requirements may be necessary.} - -- ... Draina!!e Studv Tvpe mDSPM Section 4.03.2): (Note. un mav he suhstituted for Rational Method) o Small Site Study - (use Rational Method for calculations) o Mid-Level Development Study - (use Unit Hydrograph Method for calculations) D Full Drainage Development Study - (use Unit Hydrograph Method for calculations) Environmental Considerations: D Wellhead Zone: D Wetland/Riparian: D Soil Type: Downstream Analvsis: ON/A D Flow line for starting water surface elevation: D Design HGL to use for starting water surface elevation: D Manhole/Junction to take analysis to: D Hillside Development: D Floodway/Floodplain: D Other Jurisdictions: Return to Mall Stouder (Q) City ofSprinetield. email: mSlouder(QJci.sprinetield.or.us, FAX: (541) 736-1021 12-8-2006 Brenda Jones I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I COMPLETE STUDY ITEMS 1_- - For Official Use Only: - -I * Based upon the itiformation prol'ided on the front of this sheet. the following represents a minimum of what is needed/or an application 10 be complele/or submiual wilh respect to drainage: hoU'e\'er. this list should nol be used in lieu of the Springfield Development Code (SDC) or the City's Engineering Design Afanual. Compliance wilh these requirements does not constitute site appro\'al; Additional site specific information may be required. Note: Upon scoping sheet submilla/, ensure completed/orm has been signed in the space prO\'ided be/ow: Interim Design StandardslWater Quality (EDSPM Chapter 3) Req'd NIA o 0 All non-building rooftop (NBR) impervious surfaces shall be pre-treated (e.g. multi-chambered catch basin w/oil filtration media) for stonnwater quality. Additionally, a minimum of 50% of the NBR impervious surface shall be treated by vegetated methods. o 0 Where required, vegetative stonnwater design shall be consistent with interim design standards (EDSPM Section 3_02), set forth by the Bureau of Environmental Services (BES) or Clean Water Services (CWS). o 0 for new NBR impervious area less than 15,000 square feet, a simplified design approach may be followed as specified by the BES for vegetative treatment. D D If a stormwater treatment swale is proposed, submit calculations/specifications for sizing. velocity, flow. side slopes, bonom slope, and seed mix consistent with either BES or CWS requirements. o 0 Water Quality calculations as required in Section 3.03.1 of the EDSPM o 0 All building rooftop mounted equipment, or other fluid containing equipment located outside of the building, shall be provided with secondary containment or weather resistant enclosure. Gener-t Study Requirements (EDSPJ\1 Section 4.03) o ] Drainage study prepared by a Professional Civil Engineer licensed in the state of Oregon. D ] A complete drainage study, as required in EDSPM Section 4.03.1, including a hydrological study map. D ] Calculations showing system capacity for a 2-year stonn event and overflow effects of a 25-year stonn event. o ] The time of concentration (Tc) shall be determined using a 10 minute start time for developed basins. Review of Downstream System (EDSPJ\1 Section 4.03,4,C) o 0 A downstream drainage analysis as described in EDSPM Section 4.03.4.C. On-site drainage shall be governed by the Oregon Plumbing Specialty Code (OPSC). o 0 Elevalions of the HGL and flow lines for both city and private systems where applicable. Design of Storm Systems (EDSPM Section 4.04) o 0 flow lines, slopes, rim elevations, pipe type and sizes clearly indicated on the plan set. o 0 Minimum pipe cover shall be 18 inches for reinforced pipe and 36 inches for plain concrete and plastic pipe materials, or proper engineering calculalions shall be provided when less. The cover shall be sufficient to support an 80,000 Ib load without failure of the pipe structure. o 0 Manning's "n" values for pipes shall be consistent with Table 4- I ofthe EDSP. All storm pipes shall be designed to achieve a minimum velocity of three (3) feet per second at 0.5 pipe full based on Table 4-1 as well. Other/Mise o D Existing and proposed contours, located at one foot interval. Include spot elevations and site grades showing how site drains D D Private stonnwater easements shall be clearly depicted on plans when private stonnwater flows from one property to another o 0 Drywells shall not receive runoff from any surface w/o being treated by one or more BMPs. with the exception of residential building roofs (EDSP Section 3.03.4.A). Additional provisions apply 10 this as required by the DEQ. Refer to the website: \I,'Ww.deo.state.or.uvwo/(lroundwafuichome.hcm for more infonnation. o 0 Detention ponds shall be designed to limit runofTto pre-development rates for the 2 through 25-year storm events "'This form shall be included as an attachment. in.dde the/ront cover, 0/ the stormwater stud)' -I . IMPORT ANT: ENGINEER PLEASE READ BELOW AND SIGN! -- - As the engineer of record, I hereby certifY the above required items are complete and included with the submined storm water study and plan set. Signature: Date: 12-8-2006 Brenda Jones Interior Architecture andscape Architecture .and Use Planning I>raphic Arts Development Consulting aertified Arborist 'nvironmentat Planning IUbliC Involvement I I I I 'aniel G. George. LA anag log Principal A 832, ID 16533 _hriSIOPher A. Baumann, LA rincipal and Director of andscape Architecture WA 635, OR 354, CA 3434 lark D. DiLoreto, AlA irector of Architecture WA 8809, OR 3086, ID AR2657 1601 Broadway Street Vancouver, Washington 98663 .hone: 360-750-9000 ax: 360-750-9201 si@planningsolulloosinc.com www.planningsolulionsine.com I August I, 2007 Linda Pauly, Planner City of Springfield Development Services 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Regarding: Williams Bakery Fuel Station (PRE2007-00039 IDRC200S-00029) Dear Ms. Pauly, Please find attached all required plans, documents, fees and applications for a Type I Site Plan Modification (Minor) for the proposed Fuel Station to be added to Williams Bakery, located at 2000 Nugget Way. The Applicant seeks to add a new fueling facility to their recently approved and constructed development. This new fuel station will be for the sole use of delivery trucks owned and operated by Williams Bakery. The proposed fuel station will add approximately 885010 square feet to the previously approved 383,08210 square feet of impervious surface, an increase of approximately 0.23%. This modification does not propose additional landscape areas, parking areas, or access ways. We respectfully request your approval of this minor modification to a previously approved and constructed project. P:\2Ol)7 Projectsll070-Wlli<ons Sakery\2.0 land Use Process\203 Prelininary land Use Review (Date)\2.03.01 PLR-S1 (08.07)\2.03.01.01 PLR-Sl DoclJllenlsll070 PLR 51 NarTative.doc _Sta~as~us_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _el_ _ Home View Case Status City of Springfield Status The information below summarizes the case you selected. Case Number: PRE2007-00039 Name: Application Date: Address: Activities Type Materials Submitted Print Meeting Info Engineer Assigned Print Meeting Info Meeting Complete Planner Assigned Status: Finaled UNITED STATES BAKERY 6/13/2007 11 :24:06 AM 12000 Nugget Way I Requested I I Scheduled I I 112/17/2007 I Fees Item CTY Site Plan Modify - Major Completed 6/13/2007 6/13/2007 16/13/2007 16/13/2007 6/19/2007 16/20/2007 I Fee Amount 1325.00 I Disp (done by) ITAJ I ITAJ I TAJ I TAJ ,LLP I ILLP Parcel Help [Notes I I I I ApP will be Site Plan Wod Minor. Type I per JD 6-20-07 I Pauly Fee Remaining 0.00 I Paid Date 16/13/2007 http://www.ci.springfield.or.usltm_binltmw_cmd.pl?tmw cmd=Status ViewCase&shl_ caseno=PRE2007 -00039&projectcasetag... 7/25/2007 I I I I I I I I~~~ I ~/ I I. I I I I I I I I POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE 0R2026-47-0244275-2006.73\ 06-720 13365 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF OREGON SUBJECT TO THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE, THE EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE CONTAINED IN SCHEDULE B AND mE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS, CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF OREGON, an Oregon corporation, herein called the Company, insures, as of Date of Policy shown in Schedule A, against loss ,or damage, not exceeding the Amount of Insurance stated in Schedule A, susiained or incurred by the insured by reason of: 1. Title to the estate or interest described in Schedule A being vested other than as stated therein; 2. Any defect in or lien or encumbrance on the title; 3. Unmarketability of the title; 4. Lack of a right of access to and from the land. The Company will also pay the'costs, attorneys' fees and expenses)ncurred in defense of the title, as insured, but only to the extent provided in the Conditions and Stipulations. ..) " KEEP THIS POLICY' IN A SAFE PLACE __ :,-....;..._.l:oiJaster se.yice iinfuture' salesorloansonyour property / .. present this slip to. your brokeru',loan-co-mp""Y',,:Ou;,;;;g:-. CASCADE TITLE CO. PolicyNl' 0244275 . 0R2026 0244275 We appreciate your business andwillcontinlie giving yo. tlie best service p\,ssible: ... . . . Cascade Title Company 811 WiIlamette Street . CASCADE TITLE CO. . 811. Willamette Stree~ . Eugene, Oregon. 97401 Phone (541) 687-2233 Eugene, OR 97401-3189 Sf-101. Rev. 6/96 Reorder Fonn No. 9452 (Reprinted 02J01) AL TA Owners Policy (10-17-92) I, I I I I I I I I I I TRANS SI TYPE IND INF. IND CODE 106 CODE 50 CODE . CODE CODE CODE REISSUE AMOUNT ORDER NO_ POLICY NUMBER 024427S 73106-7201336S DATE OF POLICY JUNE 2, 2006 AT 3:S1 P;M. AMOUNT . $2,807,SOO.00 PREMIUM $7,989.80 OWNERS POLICY 11~lmm~llmllm~ S\..n,~d."",~E A Order No.: 0244275 Policy No.: 73106-720l336S Amount of Insurance: $2,807,SOO.00 . Premium: $7,989.80 Date of Policy: JUNE 2, 2006 AT 3:51 P.M, 1. Name of Insured: UNITED STATES BAKERY an Oregon corporation 2. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in Schedule C and which is covered by this policy is: Fee Simple' 3. Title to the estate or interest in the land referred to herein is at Date vested in: 'I.~~' ---.-----.-- -~ UNITED STATES BAKERY an-Ore~gbi1~coz:.po~"'at:bji-J.-----" I I I I I I I . 4 . The land referred to in this" pol'icy is described on the attached Schedule "e" and made a part hereof. , . I I I I I I I I I I I 1__6. 7. I I I I I I I Page No.2 . Order No. 0244275 Policy No. 73106-72013365 . SCHEDULE B , This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorney's fees or expenses) which arise by reason of. the" following: special Exceptions: 1. Easement, including the terms.and provisions thereof, granted the City of Eugen~, recorded December' 15; 1967, Reception No. 8194, Lane County Official Records. 2. Easements as shown on the recorded plat of wildish Industrial Tracts, except that portion of the railroad easement along the Westerly boundary of Block 2, vacated.by City of Springfield Ordinance No. 6139, recorded AprilS, 2006, Reception No. 2006- 023042, Lane County Official Records, 3. Easements for utilities over and across the premises formerly included within the boundaries of the. vacated railroad easement vacation by City of Springfield Ordinance No. 6139, recorded AprilS, 2006, Reception No. 2006-023042, Lane County Official ,Records, if any such exist, as reserved therein. Wildish Industrial Park Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions, incl~ding the t~rms and provisions ther~of (but omitting covenants or 'restrictions, if any, based upon race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, familial status, marital status, disability, handicap, national origin, ancestry" or source of income, as set forth in applicable state or federal laws, except to the extent that said covenant or restriction is permitted by applicable law) recorded February 29, 1996, Reception No. 9613731, Lane County Deeds and Records. 4. 5. peclaration of Easement for Access, Utilities and Provisions for Maintenance, including the terms and provisions thereof, recorded October 4,. 200S, Reception No. 2005-078938, Lane County Official Records. . Glenwood Urban Renewal Plan, including the terms and provisions thereof, recorded ~e:::~=_~:!7_!..o!.~2QJ)~,:_Reeep.tion No. 2004-095229, Lane County Deeds and Records. Modified Improvement Agreement Including Notice of Potential Assessment Lien, including the terms and provisions thereof, between the City of Springfield and Wildish Industrial Development corporation, recorded June 6, 2005, Reception No. 2005-040666, Lane County Official Records. 8, Public utility easement, including the terms and provisi~ns thereof, granted the city of Springfield, recorded June 6, 2005, Reception No, 2005-040668, Lane County Official Records. ,I 9. Public utility easement, including the terms and provisions thereof, granted the city of Springfield, recorded June 6, 200S, Reception No_ 2005-040669, Lane County Official Records. 10. Public utility easement,' including the terms and provisions thereof, granted the City of Springfield, recorded June 6, 2005,' Reception No. 200S-040670, Lane County Official Records. 11.. public util~ty easement, including the terms and provisions thereof, granted the City of Springfield, recorded June 6, 2005, Reception No. 200S-040671, Lane County Official Records. I I I I I I I I I I I I' I I I I I I I Page No.3 Order No. 0244275 Policy No. 73106-72013365 12. Public utility easement, including the terms and provisions thereof, granted to the City of Springfield,~ecorded February 14, 2006, Reception No. 2006-009942, Lane County Official Records. 13. Declaration of Easement for Access, Utilities and Provisions for Maintenance, including the terms and provisions thereof, recorded October 4, 200S, Reception No. 2005-078938, Lane County Official Records. 14. Public utility easement, including the terms and provisions thereof, granted to the City of Springfield, recorded May 5, 2005, Reception No. 2005-031288, Lane County Official Records. 15. Improvements located on' the land and further subject to all right, title and interest of the owner of the improvements. 16. Rail Access Easement, including the terms and provisions ther~of, between wildish Industrial Development Corporation, an Oregon corporation, and united States Bakery, an Oregon corporation, recorded June 2, 2006, Reception No. 2006-038523, Lane County Deeds and Records. The policy has been modified by the following endorsements: 116.1 - Survey Endorsement END OF SCHEDULE B . _.___.._ _~,___....a__---.....! , I I Page No.4 Order No. 0244275 ,'Policy No. 73106-72013365 SC.o.J.':o.IJ\,oO..:"E "C" II The land referred to in the Policy is described as follows: Land only described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of Lot 1, Block 2 of Wildish Industrial Tracts as platted and recorded in Book S6, Page 11 of the Lane County Oregon Plat Records; thence along the West line of said Block 2 South 000 02' .25" West 723.16 feet to the Southwest corner of Lot 4 Block 2 of said wildish Industrial Tracts; thence leaving said West line and runnin~ along the South line of said Lot 4, Block 2, South 890 S7' 35" East 183.25 feet to the Southeast corner of said Lot 4, Block 2, said point being in the Westerly margin of Nugget Way, 2S.0 feet from, when measured at right angles to, the centerline of Nugget Way;' thence leaving the South line of said Lot 4, Block 2 and running along the Westerly margin of Nugget Way South 00002' 25'~ West 166.26 feet and along the arc of a 70.00 foot radius curve left (the chord of which bears South 140 25' 45" East 34.98 feet) a distance .of 35.36 feet to the southeast corner of Lot 5, Block 2 of said Wildish Industrial Tracts; thence leaving the West;erly ~argin"of Nugget Way and running along the South line of said Lot 5, Block '2 South 610 06; 00" West 152.59 feet to the Southwest corner of said Lot 5, Block 2; thence reaving said South line and running South 360 06' 25" West 273.98 feet to a point on the Northerly boundary of the Ashland Line of the southern Pacific Railroad right of way, said point being 30.0 feet Northerly of, when measured at right angles to the centerline of the Ashland Line of the Southern Pacific Railroad right of way; thence along said Northerly boundary of the Ashland Line of the Southern Pacific Railroad right of way North 530 54' 33" West 148.48 feet to a point marking the intersection of the Northerly boundary of Ashland Line of the Southern Pacific Railroad right of way and the East line of the C.B. Sweet D.L.C. No. 38 in.Township 18 South, Range 3 West of the Willamette Meridian; thence along the East line of the C.B. Sweet D.L.C. No. 38 North 000 10' 26" East 71.66 feet to a point marking the intersection of the East line of the C.B. Sweet D.L.C. NO. 38 and a line parallel to and 88.0 feet Northerly ~f the centerline of the Ashland Line of the Southern Pacific Railroad right of way; thence leaving the East line of said C.B. . --,-~'-.s".::e=~-:!),.:!..:-J~ ._!-!~__3~_~!!d_~'_:!!l-!'i.:n9'_;:;!J.n;'H:~_the_Nor_ther_lv__line qf said ,.Ashland Line of the Southern.Pacifi'c Railroad right.ofw~y North 530 5.41 3311--W~;t~-25n.40 feet to a ,point which is 75.0 feet Easterly of when measured at right angles to the "y'Line" of the South Pacific Railroad; thence along a line parallel to and 75.0 feet Easterly of, the centerline of the 'Y Line" of the Southern Pacific Railroad along the arc of a 500.00 foot radius curve right (.the chord of which bears North 20 52' 21" West 777. 5S feet) a distance of 890.76 feet to a point marking the intersection of the Easterly margin of the "Y Line" of the Southern Pacific Railroad and the South margin of County Road No. 443, said point being 30..0 feet Southerly of, when measured at right angles to, the centerline of County Road No. 443 as said centerline is established in C.S.F. NO. 27798; thence leaving the Easterly margin of the "Y Line~' of" the Southern Pacific Railroad and running along the Southerly margin of , County Road NO. 443 North 890 59' 02" East 277.32 feet to a point ~arking the intersection of said Southerly margin and the East line of the C.B. Sweet D.L.C. No. 38 in Township 18 South, Range ,3 West of the Willamette Meridian; thence along the East line of said C.B. Sweet D.L.C. No. 38 North 000 10' 26" East 6.77 feet to a point marking the intersection of the East line of the C.B. Sweet D.L.C. NO, 38 and the South margin of County Road No. 443, said point being 30.0 feet Southerly of when measured at right angles to the centerline of County Road No. 443 as said centerline is established in the plat of Wildish Industrial Tracts, as platted and recorded in Book 56, Page 11 of the Lane County Oregon Plat Records; thence leaving the East line of the C.B. Sweet D.L.C. No. 38 and running along the South margin of County Road No. 443 North 640 41' 10" East 243.99 feet to the point of beginning all in Lane County Oregon. continued- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I PARCEL A: I. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page No.5 Order No. 0244275 Policy No. 73106-72013365 property Des~r~pt~on continued- PARCEL B, Beginning at Northwest corner of Lot 1, Block 2 of Wildish Industrial Tracts a~ platted and recorded in Book 56, Page 11 of the Lane County Oregon plat Records; thence along the West line of said Block 2 South 00. 02' 2S" West 426.66 feet to the true pchnt of beginning; thence North 890 20' 24" East 183.26 feet to a point on the West mafgin of Nugget Way, said point being 25.00 feet from when measured at right angles to ~he centerline of Nugget Way; thence along the West margin of Nugget Way South 000,02' 25" West 298,74 feet to the Southeast corner of Lot. 4, Block 2 of said wildish Ind~strial Tracts; thence leaving the West margin of Nugget Way and running along the SouFh boundary of said Lot 4, Block 2 North 890 57' 35" West 183.25 feet to the Sout~west corner of said Lot 4, Block 2; thence North 000 02' 25" East 296.S0 feet to the true point of beginning, all in Lane County, Oregon. ! I Excluding from said parcels A and B, buildings, structures and all other improyements located on and permanently annexed to said land. PARCEL C, Beginning at the Southeast corner of Lot S, Block 2 of Wildish Industrial Tracts as platted and recorded in Book 56, Page 11 of the Lane County Oregon Plat Records; thence along the South line of said Lot 5, Block 2 South. 610 06' 00" West IS2.59 feet! to the Southwest corner of said Lot 5, Block 2; thence leaving said South line and running South 360 06' 2S" West 273.98 feet to a point on the Northerly boundary of the! Ashland Line of the Southern Pacific Railroad right of way; said point being 30.0 feet; Northerly of, when measured at right angles to the centerline of the Ashland ~ine of the Southern Pacific Railroad right of way; thence'along said Northerly bounda~ of the Ashland Line of the Southern Pacific Railroad right of way South 530 54' 33" iast 506.26 feet to a point marking the intersection of the Northerly boundary of bhe Ashland Line of the Southern Pacific Railroad right of way and the southwesteily __~;;:=~:;e=t:_i~~_!:'f_t:~e-!-?'="!:t.he:'.:.ly_bou~da_rv_of Lot 11, Block 2 o'f said wildish Industrial Tracts; thence leaving the Northerly boundary of said railroad right of way a~d runn~ng along the Northerly boundary of said Lot 11, Block 2 North 360 06' 25" East 2~4.96 feet to the corner common to Lot 7, Lot 8 and Lot 11 in Block 2 of said Wildish Industrial Tracts; thence along the common boundary between Lot 7 and Lot 8 in Block 2 of said wildish Industrial Tracts North 290 07' 10" East 169.35 feet to a point on th~ Southerly margin of Nugget Way, said point being 25.00 feet from, when measur~d at right angles to, the centerline of Nugget Way; thence along the Southerly margin of Nugget Way North 60. 52' SO" West 385.97 feet and along the arc of' a 70.00 fo6t radius curve right (the chord of which bears North 44. S3' 2S" West 38.57 feet) a di~tance of 39.07 feet to the point of beginning, all in Lane County, Oregon. i i Excluding from said Parcel C, buildings, structures and all other on and permanently annexed to said land. i improvement $ , located I I I I I I I I I I I 'I-,m_. I. I I I I I I Page No.6 Order No. 0244275 Policy No. 73106-72013365 SURVEY ENDORSEMENT Attached to Policy No. 73-106-72013365 Office File No. 0244275 Issued by CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF OREGON Dated: AUGUST 17,2006 AT 8:00 AM Premium: $50.00 The Company insures the Insured that:, 1. The land is the'same as that delineated on the plat of a survey made by Poage Engineering & Surveying Inc., Jonathan A. Oakes, Surveyor, revised on August"] 7, 2006, Drawing No. 3144, which is attached hereto and made.a.part hereof. . The Company hereby insures the Insured against loss which the insured shall sustain in the event that the assurances of the Company herein shall prove to be incorrect. . This endorsement is made a part of the policy and is subject to all the terms and provisions' thereof and of any prior endorsements thereto. Except ~o the extent expressly stated, it neither modifies any of the terms and provisions of the policy and any prior endorsements, nor does it extend the effective date of the policy and any prior endorsements, nor does it increase the face amount thereof. CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF OREGON _.O~..____ c....~_._~- d=__ ~ ..,..___.._.,..____. _T_.~~-=......~."______-.. ---.---=~ -~ Endorsement No.] 16.1 lIIiI - SCALE r ,";""" c 50 100: -.',, .'\ 200 100 'fD.5'e'IlE~R l"'s.ooP.. 'HllO' .._-1\ _._--... V IOO.........-----.~- ~~/f\.....-' ~ " "",,'lO' f') '~. 'R(B,:,R . WI C~ i!.-.MPt, 518' REB,.,R 'GU~\~'PIM:4:~, ~, - lItf.-4 SEW[Nl CD @ - c " ~~ ':~:~~~~~~o+!;i ~ ,.uelL A '0 .. -;.....\~ w ' ,,;' \\\b ". ;.~ \.' .. .. IIob t:Dr.(~J'C' .;.,.-:: ,-__ go PAIJ ~...7~ t....\ ,,', '!.Z: ....~"/ 1>.rif$.'lrl . . ..... rD. P,I<' UAoll " . .KY ,\..).y I \ /#. LI2.W4P-'\" ~:.... ~ ,s 89'!I9'30' E 1HWlll[f. 2 /" ,/ ~_ ,--'lI&P.__ _ _.....!_ _ '11"".".. ..~~ IH8I'1&.'1I'( 1ol1.J1'IIlEf.', / -""""'--tH 1"~J1NUl!_~:--~-~""'""",,~~),' HU''5011'ol'[ 141.Z~, ~_--1!_J...dI- _" '~("".J'" ,.~,;",,-,~,-,,~,,,,,-;.t;;05\n~/'; .1 ;"''@---~;:I:~;:O;;-1HH~1'''~;: I' 6.1'~.'26'[ E 697161RU .. ./~ / ~ ~ ?1~ I ~ /.~ ~ : 9 ':J. ' 1 Q o'\) / ' /" o~ .~~ I' /. '-i-~" \,," l~~ - 0\)'\ "'~_\10~' / i /'. ,,\~ ."'~\" / I I " I' , I \ \ Addillona\ cout!les! CHORO BEARING SW2S"1jB'( ';44'51'i:,"( CHORO 0151 ANeE -----: 34.VS' .18,51' - - ~ 70.00' 1\1.00' - .t!:.:- ~ 3'LW 311.07' 2S'56'i:5' 11'58'50' '... ~ \ /, , CEtliEflllij \ 1'> QfRA.lI,ROA.D9Y , SPl{1,0{,,~HE \ - - - rlCIA.AliOPOSlllOti THE NW COllrl[R D"tt1Ell.lC~('l' Ole N~ '1 / PER REF . I ' I I I . tl HO,II) '/fOOS' \ ~ \ ~\ Ii :l ,~ \ ,\~ i '\\ , , , \ . \ n' \., I" 0' \\ I \ ~i "'; . r"~'. '-i';'I'11 , 8: .. , ,... g ~"'lIllltll\ I g. '" jC( AlDlIc;, \ ~ - PROPERTllllll \ ~! - - -N -;'1~'i4:( 1~-3~26~ I ~ \ 3 . 1.1 i : :. 1-.111' # l~\l 'iri9;~Fi~r["iai"is~' \ ~ \ \ 'PARCEL 8 ~ j \~ i\ (VACANT) 0\...\ t ,...... . g \~ ~' .!::: 1'-' ~~ ~.ll~1 Q'i LZI ,~ ,R ~ 1<:' ~lO"'i!'W t IA11~'1--t,i, ! H-:7'. .- CI1AltlLlNK ". /WaiE ALONG PROPERt'l' L~E ~ :...... - ~ ~ ~. ~ <> !::l.... <> . 0 , ~ .~ ~ o g ~. .;~ Q" '" <l- 2 :.... . . ,j ~ " ; , \ie : 2 ., .0 '. . .N 2"snrw m_s~' AL,.19076'IIAO,'SOO,o u.IU'04'14' .,;: ~ :.1 d .' , , TaUI 'OINt ~ .,GINNING 'Al.CI\.' \ 1 ell "'s"i~;sns'E 11144' (n. ,; . c" .' '- ~f ~'Ib . ~ .....5 ~:::! \/1('iTllt1E : uT,lOl14 : Cl[N~IOOO p....Rl( \ PER ~~F, 4 , 1 ~: 3: g I = I N ~ o c, " ~ '" " "~ ';"? ~8 .. ~ ^ '''' - - - - - - - - - - ,. .,-' ..--- ..,. ,) - (!) /@ -@ /. @ @ ,. - l Notei CorrupondJn.e: to Title Exreotions 1 (j) flAlERlINE EI.$Eut:IH Itlf.:....Of!(lr TH[ CltT Of EUGENE C::iA"TEOBr ANlNSlIlUlAWT D[CHleER1~.19"1 RECE~ll(1N 110. B19~ tAHf.'COlRlIY OIl[CCIIl OlEO R(COROS AflOSHOWNr(REON. <D (l.'iEI<i(N1SI.SSI'lOWNONTl1ERECQRO(DptllorVIILMIt INDUSTRIAL TRACTS, BOOK 56. PC ~l.N[ C{lUNhOllECON ptATIlECOlltlS,r_C[PT1HA1POlllI0HorlH[UlROAO [I.SEMfN'AlOIIC1H[W{SIERtT&OUNIlI.RTOr8tOCKi ",ACHEDBl :HT or SPllltlcrUllOf!Drt-I...,.CC HO,61l' UCO~D[O "Pllll 5.10116 REtEP. NO. 20116.0210~2 LAliE COU'H~ OIlECOI<I ornel"t RECORDS, [I.S[I,l[NTfORUTlllTI[SOV[IlAIlO.CIlOSSTII[PR[IllSES rOIl~\[Rl y IOItttlOED WlIKH 11<<: BOUND_liltS or UtE 'H.C.UEQ 1l...\t.AO.w[...m.q:NI"'SRtStRV[D'lNV"C.~llONOROINAtlt[ItQ,6119 RECOROED t,PRll S,2~1)!,'R[C[P. NO. lOIl6'OH042 lANE COIINTY ORECONomW,LRCCOIlDSlI'ANYSUCHHIST,1l0SIK:HL1TI.lTI(SlXISI. Q) G> III( PRoP(1l1'l' IS Stl8J1:CT TO ,~( COVENANTS, COII[.111ONS AND II(Sl1l1C11011S fOR WlDISH ~I[lUSTrd'" TRAC1S AS R{CO~O(D HHIlUM!'I' 19, 1~96 RtCEP. UD. 96.13131 LAN( CllUtllf OflE[;llH D[[OIl[COROS (l) J60 rOOl YiIDC JOINT AC(tSS AIIl' Utllll'l' [~swtlll ANO \,IAN~lENANC( AGR((I.lENl MCOllrD OCT08!1l4. 100S REC[P. "0, lOOs.ol~..n LAli[ COONTYOR(CON OHlCIAl RECQR9S AND SHOWN H[IIEOU. 1.0 rOOl PlJ8llC UTllll'! (ASWUll ChlHEDBY AN JlSlRUllEH1,IlECORl'rD.NI1E6,'00511[CEP.1l0, loj)S.O~0661 LAN( COlIilY ORECON,OI'fICI~l IlEtOliOS AND SNOWN.t(.RHlH 10fOcTPUIlLICUIILIHEAS(ur.t;1':;IlAN1EOa'l'Atl INSTIl~I.l!J+1Il[C/jIlOEO JIJ-lE 6, )005 IlE[(P. NO. lODS.04Dfo69LJ.Ht COUlI1'l' ORWJIfOrnCIALfI[COROS. ANDSHOII'NH[R[~' . 1S.0 f~l)T PUBLIC UIlI,llY [AS[lI(l+1.M<AJiTEO BY AN ql'ilRU~ItT "[CCRDED Jl~lt 6,1(005 RECEP. tlO. 2MS.040610lAtl[ COUllT'l' ORtGONOffICIAlRECOP,nS '.l.ND SHOWN I<E~EON . t'lO fOOl F1JIlUC UIllllV CJ;,~Et.l(lll r.P.A'~T[D 6'1' Atl lHSIJI\M'H1R[CCIlOEOJUlIE6,ZClllSpt';EPNO i(10~.~~067IlMiE COUHTt OR{GCW I;Jff/l;Mi. RH.ORDS. AND ~~(lYlN HEREOll VJ;,RIAIlE WIOTI1 "'JRIC Ullun E.I.~W[UT GRANI[[l B'l' AN ~lSIIlIftl(1H RECORDED fUI'lUAn'l' l~, 100" /IECEF. NO, ltlD6.00'9~llAN[ CQUlHY O/IECOIl orflClAl RECOIIUS .4,10/0 SHOWN Ii{REON @ It>O 1001 WIDE JOINT ~(tESi "1.QUIIU1'l' [.I.,EM[NI AllO",All'l1[NAIM Ar,GWltNHf[COREO OCl06;:/I ~, ~005 /IEc(P. 110 lU05.0a9311 lAH(CQUliI'YIl/l({;ONorrIClAlP[C~(lSANI)SHOWNnEnEON. @) l'iO fOOT i'UBllC UJ1I.I1'l' E..I.SCIl{ll! r.RANI(D BY AN ~sm~EHI REr.O~tll.O w'! S. ~OO~ REeEp, 110 ?GO~.(Il1)U l.l.llf rOtllll~ f1REGC'N OffICIAl. RECORDS AtItl SOlOWN HEREON RAL ~rcrss USEMtNT,lNCU,Ill!lC THE 1[111.15 .l.tlOPIlOVI'illlNS HttR(OI', eE"~lEN WlI.DIStllNIJlJ'ilRIAl O('1[LOPll[llj CORPORATION AN OHtGOlICORPOF!A1IOH AtII1l1l~TEO SII.HS BAKEl", AN,')R(GOH CO/lP~AIIO" REC()ROED JUN( 6. lG(lb. REc(P11GH NO. 2006.03AS1~ lMlf. ,OOHT,)' OREGON ornclAl R(EOllOS AND SHOYIN HtREON. @ - - - - - "- \ \ " \ ". \ " . '''.''. "" .", " It".. S u'O":~' {lll,!n-t \ IP:~O. . In.l~ _L ' 14PlI "- \ 16' Jl'11.0' , '\ ~ g g' , .. '~',' .,. '- pA.len IlNDUJUIAL IUNDIA A tAkUYI , ;':ONnIUCTltlNI 0, jl " ....f, PA' \ \ \ '.(.P'IIII;;AN ~101lAC( . "'PEllAtI'. Zoning Data 20r/lIG CL,~SSf'ICATIQN lIE p~OfeRn tS ZON(D U1ILIGHHt:DlJN UJJlJSlklAl USB l HNCTUIIE$- CUlIP.\:...TLf TIE P~!lI'EAl'l' IS VACA...T. A 8Af.e~y F~Cllh ~l~~~~~~~~ TIESllE ltHICH f! A fEAtl1TEOU~E IlIlttN TtIUrt ZOIUl{, LOI ~REA " l~mllltL 11-1: tltUUlLOl idEA St-lAll BE 10(10(1 SWARE HE' ~~A:'W~~Jr~T~Rrm~6s~g~EflE't~~E~:i~n~e l~ FEEl. UE lNltlfEOUl.A1K11l5'1IEREIS^'lAMTEOltollfOUTOtll.llUKiSiTllI\CKREOI."eDALGllli THE HOtll ~AIID SIREET SIlE YAAO ..I.I(IINROUr.H lOl t.HR 'I'/\IlD AMI ~, nMlIEll ~,CRU~i~:A~~~fO;:\~~;;\~l~Il^RSel~lf~~~WRro~:~,c:'e.~~O,"tn~ fS' ^ TI-IlUIiilU'T.W11I11tAlltZG/fIt\iClASWICATIOH, 'He~E t,Rf NO &Ullltl[; HEl(iHT~E5TalCl<<ll11 \1'HN A ll1 2llllES EXCEP' illlERE THE A~ufr~t~:t~Tz~8~~~:::;~ ~ONO: ~ Ifr:~~rsER1Y, IIESl4iACT fWEU, _"',~~~~~~l'UI_"'GE~e_fORl~U1 I I I - Statement of Encroachm l!I Pll8l.1C SIOlIuWAIERPiF[ CIlQSSE'ilr€SIJBLC1P"0I' II( 8ENfrn or A PUfLlC EAS(~(ij'. - - -- - - - IIiI - - ~,/- " -- .. .. .; .. < 00 ic/ll_- NO ~O .- -;;; . . - Surveyor's Certification / Th IdulilU4 hu., Ulliflu 'I Wildl.1I Idull,l.' lh!nl I C Villi" ...,., I.h,,' c....., III' Cuudo Till .'1111 III,ofllln, Ih1l'1 Ih'ICIIIIHI 'cu"h' hull, ,.. lee.II.: Cl".'.t, Ihl Ibl, III,n, ~orr'cllr ._'lll,rOUlllnl1.-llIu,Id.lhrcol -tU"u I _ I II ,f 11IlIIllI.II,I. IIUtlll" u, Ilh, ,ulrlcUOII ad 1..llIIhnu: oalll :I~ID to ~ I,ll-of."., ....-.Il-.,hl.nuouhilull.-~'-- 1II"nl,.... lIul lit wllibl. 01 lIu ~fC:i~..1 :, ~~'.~I::: I.'''',:::,.~"''''' '10 llac Tbe 1\lIIJlel "IIPIII, "PUTI.I PIMA Co I .. .rr.elln 'IU It ,...~Z "99 . ....... I IIl1lU I, "..11'0. 410J9C1I41.p hill,. ubjnl III 1....'110. b, flo~' -""II::' I. .011,',',",,",1,''',. I Ih", Zn. X lIlIlell I' "."Ulol. I h..lly urllr,lhlrllll ""'J "'1"11 d II" Ill'" It Icctl'nn ,,1111 "IIlt,II11I/11 'l"':r~' 'IIJ. :::I~" A. O;ku ud ..1 ALTAlACSM LU6 TI.l. SU"'I', "1111, 'l\I"illld .:4,..~::::. ~r AUA ,,4 ~C$M I. lU't "'Inl,... '''Ilur "nlfl.. rhl '1'0,., 11.'4 ' .,... .".. 1.11'.....1.11.., "' "''lUI. '"'~" .III....I-w". '..;1.,.. ~ .Ir"~." ullln. rtll/.1I1 CDIlI,ar,.I. II llull DlIlI... III I" 'MI.ill'lI ., . 1111" 114 CI.I... ..,.IflauII 'er ..,.., Mu,,"....tl W.lcll CUllo' L... .......1.1 '0' ALTAlACU4 L... Till. h'..,..' T... lun, II hu6... Proliralu" Till. .'p.'1 No O1HZU . II CU'.d. Till. Coap..y ... bnrl'l II .lfullu '.I~ of .... :~':;~:. ' 1,~'fI.....Lo{L J....... A. o.t.. 11...1111111.. H., UOI wlIU. ,Ilt Stall of Off. III D.1e .1 hu.,: M'IIIl;'UOS D'II 01 'If II Prill: 101., 10, lOO' D," 0' LIII IlIilln: AII'~." JI. 2006 Leund o . PROPERTy C\l~tER COtIPUTEO'OiNJ!lUIIOMJIIEIIT ~T llo\TERY^lVE FIREHYDRAfIlJ" ....rERt'ElER o ~ !;> III OJ OJ ...- O"'S'I"UE .AJU(llllNBOX POiliERFo)lE ... ~.....~ .' ~~~>~ ~'M.~~ - - - - - - - Lega' Description J '<&nu. -ltiiiil.,llliir.-;ili.ii;I,".....-;;,~i-~rL.ll lI.d a ,~.W:--._------.-------_._----..._. '.leI IIca,'1d I. lDok J6 PI.. II of n ~ C 0 Il'bll 11'''''1.1 TUCII It ,bll.d ,I. weai -It" ., ill' Il~C. J Sui. 'D"'I'I:: . 'YI:I, Ou... ,j.1 "cod.; I..... alGo, L'tI 4, II.d 201.." WII.IIIIII"III1.jll1' ..i11UI6hIlIGI....II.....1 '''.cr of Irlli ".,..llIliel.f "l' L.I. II." 2'~1I, llll.~. Ilulo. Iii" ....Iii.. illS nllil. '/III.'1If '''1'''' IIi' LOI. 11'" "1.ll"'Sl')l'I!II'I'USIU'11 ,It. , , DC ,.. pelll..,.....1I . ",.y, 11.0 hll h.., willa D.illl" II ,1,.1 II III' I . ~nlcrl, "II,,, 0' Hillin 11.,... I,nil.llll 10.." lIuo, 11'''LIlI. I"k 2 0. 11.....""..., HIIIII W.,; 01 N'II" .., .Il11ll OO'OJ'U.. 1""'" Ie II' r.nll, .1... I.. "'lCd, ralll" " .. . "'II"lloe.'b, f 1fI ",'" I.,. (I.. dll' ., w~I.1l ""I 'nill 14'a,'t,. I ,e 0 . , ,~'.Il ,.dI" hlllo I" "'I.uil '"olo.'of.Loi I til .1' . u~ JU' h.l) I dOlllln.f H.36 1,'lWIII, 1111 .mlll, au,i. 01 Nu 'I '1/.' . I." vm4l," IIbllll.1 TI....: 11l1a11 5,tlt... a'01li. 41'0&'00" WClIIJ~~'" ..6 'u..I..ll........"I.".I., ..I" LIII J;l,...., 11101., u.4 I'''. 11.1 II"U:::I~' ;::I:o;;~;~::.':::I'l":J:I~ La. U'oc. 11.1111 1011111,1, ."I'or, of... "'1111." L . . .1111. ,.1111 .t" I.1d pollI.It"., JOO h.1 10Ultort; of 11111 If I" $.ulh,. 'ulIl. IIIlrlld,1,11I " n:"..1I1I I' lito AIIII1I4 LIII ., Ill. IIllI~": ~:,~~;-;u' II '!p.llil.. II ,.. u;4 II/Ihrl, .U~'"' .11. AI~II" Lilt" III S ,U,", '1'~I. .f I.r; lh.n 1111. N"" U"I'U' ""I It' U fa ..' 111."1 '"clII. '''1,." '1.111 .t w,y ..'...." 0' AI..... LI~. 01 ;~ I~ . :'11. ;I'Uca I.. hllm",llo. 0' I" IOr....I, ofllh C.I. SWill D.L.C. H.. JJ '11 ;~II:~I I;:'~D .:IIIOI4.II.l, ., w., .... lilt .11.1 li.t :;,:Id;~:~I:'1C1 .ltII. ,". ...1 Ii". .f .111 'C.I.be:'1 'D~~.~~rH~.~;I~::I:.:O'~:.~~~lu. DJ.C, ~. J~d.~:1 ~;lrll .""11, Ih 1'lt."I1IIOl' ,f lh .111 HI' ,f. Ilu C....$Iil~1I ~ . I II '."11.11.... 1t.0 fill .Ol'"arl, of I" UIII,Ii f ~~11':.~.L;::c;' :~. ~O"lh" 'uIU'llll.D.lIll,.l of II') Ib.n II_Ifllloi.: .~~,' Ii.. ., 0'['11. '~1""0 ~'~Uk ~:il::I;':'.I.:I::.~I':O:~,::' ';:;:~;'."W~II a~I::'" A..III' Li.~' .....11..15.0,111...,1111;., II - . III'....... "{Ui. i.il'.Id; fIl..c. .'II.."n:: :.::~:tll'. :.III...11l1l11ll'Y LIlt' 01 11le_1ll1l" III';'Y Li... 0'1.. SII'h" '''ilic ..".... :1:. 1':~Olh.IIIIIIII'.ell.. "1l1C/IlI" of ''',II I III. .h" of wlli,~ b.." fl'"~a'n'll' WI'I 711;; ,'" SOO.OO 1111 ..Il~. IUn, hili.. ,.il. .1 t. C ., ..1 ,. dlllUU 0' 1t0.76 S ", .." .. I I '"ulull...f 1111 'Uhl', '"1.1'..' Ih'Y Li . f 01.111' 'ullle Itdl,..d "' Ih 'O~I. D"".of C.u. .. 0 I" 10.11 fill IIlllhEl,of, WIlIl*"IIUldll.I.1 ' 101' Ht.IU,lIi"fIIi.1 ..ill, N._14IJu ..i"UIIlIl..11..llblil....'I.CS;..'"..,IIl..IIIIIIIIDI of COlDlr 1014 D,I,I. I' ,., 'Y Lin' ., '" I . , '" It.. 271,., I...n Ilnl.. .be '111111, ;.. ..1111 '1111,1111,..,.. I. . 1I'~'i. .f COUI., I,., No, 141 HOrl~ "'S911Z' B I Ill.. I' .1.., I.. .DUI"", t.lrrtuU" ot 11/4 1I'llllt"l, '"1.1., I' .__I~I znn hll _I, I pol.t III1U.. .11. . roo}...'!. I' SDIIIII. ..... J Wtll .. :.. ~ I UII .... ,f 1111, C.Il, hUI D.L.C. No. J' III 0' ;'Id C.II. Swill D.L.C. No. 11 tt..lli OO'I~~~~~'~I' N..I"..: I~C"C .101, lh 1111 1111 101l1llelloo ,f Ill. ""1101 of I. -c. S III 6.1P 'UIIO, '"11 D.."I..',.. C.I',I, I... N. 44) '. .. wocl D.L.C. Ifo. ]I U' I~. 10~III IOUIII .f ..,'u I. tll, CI~IIlII'.:'~~ ~~:~I II~~:~.JO~O ':'IIOII..rlr 01 .blD lIIU1~II' .1 rl,b! ,I.ill Wildh' 104nlll.l TnCII' III d" :J II hl4.,Clllull..l. .11."11....1.1111 en'lI, 0"... '1IIluI14.' 'II'~: '".:,', ','. .ec."."'I.lt-Ok J6, "._11 of ,.. LII, l' .'. 'I'lIlhOlDfl.,CIS DI.C '~'~~Q' ,ruoo}.. Iloe'.11It IOIl~ lOu.ll.f elUII, lald_H..tt) N~I~b :~:~I'~"I!' No. ~, '111 I.. Ih 1011I..f .'....101111.11 Lau CIUI, 0'".... "' 1 1 ! '1 I I I - - - - - - 'e';I~T= PR0~ES:'t L"'_"ti) 'j1.'R --....J"'>H~ [ ''''0", "-e'rll - - ":")l'l.~ Tn..N-." ~I'..~ ~.""~i DE, E".; r ~~'I PE"ISt.)~ :HT" , 1,'8'1i'; I ~'l''',;''.- a.I].._,.,: l >- Q., l.Ll .... a > U I>: ::l ...; <Il <:; '" l.Ll E >oJ Q., f- a - OJ f- > '" 0 " Q Z 0 .. <( '" >oJ .;: - ~ IJ> , ::l , <Il "" , U c:: <( - -- ..c:; <( IJ> ,- f- "" ..J - <( ~ - - " - - - l, ,,~ ';~~"f . ~ "'~;~~ I 001~~~K4 ~.~ .o'''1l( 1~"!'U:' II 16 ,~ t,~"F ~~~~ ~..~:XZ~' ~~;;:;, ' .~<>... "'4,.....' %.';1, 1"'..... " of,: ] - - - -PId_ - G -'-- .,,,....~..,~,, .oc.u ''''''I;''~ JflJIi:tll PRES1lAlESE'IEAHArI UG. tlArVll~L GAS "AUII$lZE AS HOTED1 U.G,'^TUtlAllll:l11EAsrIOIEOJ O'lEllHEAl)l'(lllEA,TELEPHotlE"_V.CAllLE II(jlELEPHONECOtlDl" -w_ - -011',__ -,. References C.S,F.U..3J4'O GUILE .'196 2. CSF. No. 2ng, 'AH!"Il)GE _1'117 WILOlSIlIHOVSTR1ALTRA'TS 800KSli,P^GE'U LM/ECClUIHYOIlEGIlHnATIlECOAr.S ~ (,51'. No. no'. Ill/RUESS '941 s.c,s.r.t1o.36'i2f1 OAKE:i lOOI OEC"A""nOIl or PROPER" lIN( An s R[~ORCEDH81'10^~ns, 21)01 __ JU fUENr DOI,;!JNElirN".200IoOllH12 tIoNCCOIJNTYQJlECOHOrrtc'I'\LRECCR05 i'.GLE"IIWOOOPMilc; YliLUHET,PAGEUI L"!-IE CDUNn OIlE(iGH Pl"" RE~OAOS I. BI\fIC....INAtIO'^LE DEED RECORDEOAUGUSII6.I'lln AEEI.US,rlSTAUf1ENTHO 21110 LM,E COUNTY OREGON O~EO RECO~OS - - - - I ........j...'.IIU.,.I....I.'lHO' I' . u".,I,., ., N'lIel W.J; III . I II ,.. ..... 1I.lIn".1 '1,.. 11,1," .. ... Wel. IIlH h.1 I. ,.. .:..,:~: I ..".. Wilt ...,,1. .f N.U" w., k... OO'OI'U' T I I. c.,." of LIl 4 II.~. I of I t' w,'"" 'UII'''.".I.nlllll'. ."'III1I"fll" . I' Idg."l.1 ...."", ., II~ Lal 4. It'd: 1 II.~.. ".s~::' W., .." n..111 II.., It" I.g" . u"" ~., .... ta. 4. Ita.. 2; "ou. H.... OO'O~;;~ In.n hilI. ... _,h'I" " I.,hll"'; .11 I. LII. C"'" . ,1"1 ltUll 'nl,,1' ... T,u 'alll I ' , '~Ia.. .~~~'_'~~Il~ U' Icru .".., 1," 1.....-.--.-......-.- _..-- '-- . '."'..-. WW~ . ..,1..;;'1 ~, .... UW.il..1I ~~Ir' rI t~ I ttul I . ""II',""" I. .....t '6. ,.,. 'II "' I~I L:.. CIUIII" \VUII.. ,'.lhll'ri., Tllel. II ,f""",, Ih 'oul,~ 'i..., 111.4 tl. S. II..., 1"1.111 ll'06'oo! OUI'II PI" 1..lIlfl;....co 'In. .a""_'1 flfl L.. 'Ikld 2' " I " Wn' UUt lUll. I', ",g'II...., W... 2iltl hll I. : ,.1.1 :. ;:.tC.,,:::I'~I:11 ~'u" 11111", Inai., SIll' ),'ea'u' '1'11'"'1; ",if" 1,111... d,llI "' w'J":~: .::; lOr " III. ,h~I.., Lilt 0' Ih DUIIIII) 'I d", ..,,.. .. ." .....dl.. of · ~ k'., '0.0 tnl ""h.ll .f, wh. .Ill.....'f....f ...,_ "uel fl.... ",,- ' : ~ AI"'" Liu of ... 10...... 'ulfi. ......ri ''.'Ifl~'hll:'o' ,i"lo' .., 5.::~1 :;.:,.~~'d'" ~"I~. "'~Iod Llu .1 I" "1I~1',I"1 1'lmlellOl af ,.. ..Ilk I~ d 'Bill :III'.1l fie, 10' ,.iol '.d'i. 11,'lra., ,I,kl.' woy ....111 .f, :1. .'J If Ih ",'llId Li...,... Sotl'"O .f L.l II, Bluk J It IIld W(I.I.I','-1U ~"I.rl, ".....1.. 91.,. 1I'''.fI, "'va'", k......,J~., ul. '.1111" ri.":' I 1111,1. 'ft. I'; Ihu. ICIYII, III. ."llIlIly L.l II. (II., J ~"I' "''''U' e..:-:.:::;1..1I, .1ao~lb "flkI,l, ......111 of IIi. .d Loa:"I. Bladl t of Ill, WU"""~"II;:~ '; "e,."'" 10111111 I. L., J, 1.'1' , Irllll'.',-, hl_"1 LOI 1 ... lIl.111 . 0 'UIIl Ihll~~ Iln, Ih e.III1.. U'O"IO'I!IU 1l9.JJ Inl I.. 01.. ..II c~ 1 If "I' .II~II' 1.'III.i,1 f,UlI 1t.,.1l ..i., lS~DO '111 "'.. .... .~.IUld Illll,~ :~~IIII' ..'1'. .f 1f',,1I ....,. I.i. ,.ial Ihn. 1101'_ 1111 '"IIr"ly ."111 f H . '" 10. 11r. ~e"C1l1.. .1 IfIUII W.,. II.., .11,' .,e 01. 111110 ""1 'I~i' ..... ,,,,,Hull 6Il'U'SII" Will In.'' "II .... Will Ja.:'1 filii. dl.;.tul.f J,,;I f"l~e"I:~. l~" c..~. _'f ..~(.. ""1 H.... 44'5}'21' 0...... ! '. ~II.".. fOlall of "'11:~:J:,.1I10 Ln. COUO'1. C..lli.I'~f ',U 11111 11111 I' II" I - I t i I - - - - - - u'" z - t:l Z - "->0<" .., > 0:: .- :::> 0 . '" , , 2 ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ (;l ~ ~ ~ Z :il 0 ..; - 6 2 0:: .: ~ ~ .., " " .., ~ Z - (;l Z '"" '"" (;l .<<: 0 <>-,'" ;I1EET m:--- ^LT^/^CSM SURVEY SIfEET l~) OF - - I. I EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE ThefoUowingmatW'sare expressly excluded from thecovemgeoftbis policy and the-Company will Dot paymordamage,rosts,attomeys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, onlinanc:r: or governmental reguIition (mducting but not limited to building and zoning laws., ordinanas, or rqul:ations) restricting, rqulatiog, prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy,- use, or enjoymEnt of the land; (ii)' the character, dim~nsioD5 or locapon of any Improvement now or bere:Jflerereded on ~land; (Hi) a separation in uwnenhip ora change iDtbc .-: - .., or area oftbeland orany parcel ofwbicb the land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, o.r IIle effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, e:lcept to the extear that a Dotice of the enforcement thereof or a notiCe! of a defect, licD or eueumbrance nsutling&om a violation or alleged violation aff'ming tbelaod bas been rcmrdecJ in the publit m::onts atDateofPo1icy. (b)AJJy b" .,.. ." ...- po!iceJiowa'oDtexdudal by(a)abow.crcq:Jttoftltertarttbs1aDlltitzcftheexertkelbelmf'o.ranotil:e.Dfa dried, lienormamlbr:am:eremltingfromaviobmnoralkgtdViobltml afrediDg the land bas be:D. m:nnlecl in tbepubtit'reconls at DateofPoIicy. 1. Rigttts of eminent domain unles5 nol:ice ofibe exercise thereofhas beeP remnkd ill the public remrdS at DalE of Policy, but not exduding frum coverage aD)' takillg wtlkb bas oa:umd prior to DalE of Po I icy whicb wouldbebim!ingontherigtItsofapun:f:laserforwJuewitbout knowledge. I' 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or otheriDatters: a) en!atm,sutren:d, assumed or agreed to by the insurtd ~t; b) ootkoowD In theCompan;r, DOt n:corded in the public: remrdsatDateofPolicy, but known to tbeinsured claimant and DotdisdOSal in writingtotheCompany by the irtsi1red claimant priorto lbedaretheinsured daimantbecuDean in:sumI WJderthis polity; c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy; or e) muffing in lossordamagewbidJwould not have bcaJsusmined if'the insUmI daimant had paidwluefortbeestateorinterest insured by this policy. <lADy daim,whidl arisesoutoflbe"., . vmingiD thelnsured~eststeorinten!Stirisured by this policy. by reasonofdJeopenltionoffederalbankrupll.'y,stafeimolvcncy,orsinillarCreditOrs' rights laws, that is based on: (i) tbetraDs3dionaatingtbeestafeorintmstiDsurtdby tbis policy beingdc:ant.dafraudulmlconveyam:eorfraudulenttmmfer;or (u) be _.._..........:....1 CRatiDg the <<State or mlm5t insUmJ by this policy being deemed a preferential tnnsfer es:a:pr where the prefemttial transfer reSults from tbe failure:: (a) to timely record tbe Instrument of transfer; or (b) oCsuch recordation to impart notite to a purchaser forvatue or a judgmenl or lieD creditor. I 1 I 1 I I CONDITIONS AND STIPULA nONS I. DEFINITION OF TERMS the rigIn of Ihe insured ID objc:a fur reasomble cause) to represenl the insured as to those stated 1 The following lerms when used in tbis policy mean: causes of action and shall not be 'liable: for andwiU not pay the fees of any other counsel. (a) "insured': the insured named in Schedule A, and. subject 10 any rigtds or The Company will oot pay any mcs. oostS orcxpens:cs incurred by thc,instmI intre defense of those defenses the Company would have had against tbe named insured, Ihosewhosuc:ceedtothe intere:stofthc causes of action which allege matters not insured against by this policy. .~ insum:l.by operalion of law as disringuisfEd fiom purdlase incIuiing. 00t nOt Iimilfd to. bcUs, (b) Th: CoptmnY-shall hlIve ~ rigti, at its 0W1'I cost, 10 irNiIuIe and Jl'DSCcute any action or distnbulees, devisees, survivors, personal representativ,es, next of kin. or corporate or proceeding or to do any other act which in its opinion may be neces;ary or desirable to estatlish fiduciary succe~sors. the title to thecstl1e or interest, as insured. or 10 pn:vent or rem.:e loss or damage to the insum:J. The Com- 1 (b) "insured claimant": an insured claiming loss or damage. pany may ~ ID1.Y -';0"....-..":...... action undcr the telm50flhis policy. 'Whether or nol it shall be liable (c) "knowledge" or "known": actual, knowledge, not constrUctive knowledge or hereunder. and shan not thereby concede liability or waive any provision of this policy. If the notkoe which may be imputed to an insured by reason of the public records as defined in Company shaD exen:iseits rights under this paragrap~, it shall do so diligently. this policy or any other records which impart constructive notice of matters affecting (c) Whenever the Company sball have brought an action or interposed a ddCIse as tbe land . , . required.()f"~ bytheprovisionsoflhis (IOli~, ~.Company may pursue any litigation to final I (d) "land": the land described or referred to in Schedule A, and impmVC1lJClU5 detc~mah~n by a.court ofcompdent Juns~lction and expressly reserves the rigbt, in its affixed therc:W which by law consriMe i'eaI pro~. The tl:nn "land" does nol include any property sole dlscrehon, to appe~ f~m any ~dve1'!eJ~dgmenr or order. . beyond the hoes of1he mea desl:ribe.d or refem:d to m Scbednle A. nor any right, title, imetest, CStll!C or (d) In all cases ~ this policy peanuts or r:qmn:s the Company to prosecute or prOVide for tbe ~t~~streets,~s,avfl.lucs,aDeys.lanes,waysorwalenwys,butoolhingbcreinshall defense of any BctlO~ or proceed~ng. the I~sured shall se~ure to the Company the ~ght to mochlY or limit the extenl to whiCh a ngl1t ofacces:s to and. from the land is insured by this so. pr?sccute or prOVide defense m the action or proceeding, ,and all appeals therein, and policy. . penrot the Companybuse,atilsOJDoo.;knameofthelmmdfurthispuzpose. Whcneverrequested by l-ifi~;'j;TI~'i.";;;;J',~'7:J:;d~'is~~t\ii~~~~~~~;'~~~,';i~i'~ri;':;';;~i:'~1;;;';;i:iiie~...c.:~~'mth; -'-"~U:::'..::"~ :~:'.:~~~o:~~':.~~"'J:~.~~~:o~;:::- purpose of imparting consrruct:ive notice of~ relating to" rcaI propcrtyto pwchasca forvatue and the ac!i~n or proceeding, or effecling settl.ement, and (ii) in any other lawfuJ act wbich in wilhout knowledge. With resped to Section I(a) (iv) of the Exclusions From Co~ ~public the.oplDlOn of.the Company may;bc necessary or desirable to establish the tille to the estate records~ sbaIl also include environmental protection liens filed in the records of the clerk of or Intere~t as lDsured.. Iftbe Company is pr~judiced by the failure of the insured to furnish the United Statcsdisll'ictcourtforthedisrrict in which the landisIOC8led.. ~he, r~qUlred ~oopc:ratlon, t~e C.ompany's obllgaDons to the inswtd lBldcr the IXIlicy shalJ ttiminate. I (g) ~unmarketabiIity of the title": an alleged or apparen} maner affecting the title to iJdu:ting any liability or obligation t.o. defend, prosecul~ or continue any litigation, with '!te land, not excluded or excepted from coverage, which would entitle a purchaser of the regard 10 (he mailer or matters n:qulnng such cooperation. e~tate or interest descri~~d in S~~dule A t~ be releaSed from the obligation to purchase by 5. PR~OFLOSSORD~GE , vlftUcofacontracnJal condiuonrcqulrIng the dc:llvery of marketable title. ~ additicm to and after the ootx:cs tcqUin:d under Section 3 oftbcse Conditions and Stipulations have been provided the Company, a proof ofloss ordarrnge signed arrl5\WRlto by the insured cl2irmnt shaD lie 12. CONTINUATION. OF I~SURANCE .AF:T~R CONVEYANCE OF TITLE fimshedto the Company within 90 days after the insured claimant shall ascenain the facts giving ~he coverage of thiS policy S.?a11 conllnu7 In force as of ~ate o~ POh.CY in favor of rise to the loss or damage. The proof of loss or damage shall describe the defect in. or lien ~n Insured only so long as the msured rellllDS ~ estate or mlen::Sl m the '.and. ~ holds an or encumbrance on the litle, or olhermatter insured against by this policy which constitutes the indcbIc:dnesssecuredbya~moneymo~ga~e given by a purchaser from lbe Insured, basis of loss ardamagtandshall 5tJte.lDthccxtenl posslble,1bebasisofCllcullllingthe amount of the loss ?r only ~o long as rhe insurrrl shall baveliability by reason ofcovenanlsofWBmlI'lty made by!he or damage. If the Company is prejudiced by the failute oflhein5un:dclaimamlo providcthe~ msw:ed I~ any tIm:'sfer or conveyance of the estate or interest. This policy shall not proofoflossordamage, the Company's obligations to the insured under the policy shalllerminatc.. I~onllnue. In force In favo.~ of a~y purchaser from the insured of either (i) an estate or d~any liahiIi1yoroliigaDontodefcnd. poser;:ut:,oroontinuemyliliB:ttion. with regard to the m;;~ I~terest 1O ~e land, or (n) an mdebtedness secured by a purchase money mortgage ormattcrsrcq. uiringsilchproofoflossordamage. . given to the Insured.. J_nadditio"?, the insured cl~mant may reasonably be required 10 subrzlilto examination underoadl by 3. NOTICE OF CLAIM TO BE GIVEN BY INSURED CLAIMANT any authorized _'-""01_''"'"''""'. oflhe Company :m.sbaII Jmb::efor _"'-__~....insp:ctiooa1dlXlP.fing.al The ins.ured ~hall norify l~e .Company promptly in writing (i) in case of any Htigalioo su:b ~.bmes and places as may be Oeslgnaled by any.authorizcd .-1"......-.......:,'- or the I~SCff:nthm~O?4(a)beIcrw,(U)Dlcase .~....' '.-vshaD romctocminslaro~ofmydaimof Company, ail R:ClIrds. books, l~ers, ~hecks,l;Omspo~ence and memoranda, whe~er bearmg a litIeorUIlm:sl~ISa:fva3etolhetideto1heest3teorinter5, as insured; and which mightC8llSeloss or date befo':C or after Date ~fPohcy, which rea'iOfl!bIy.pertalnto~mordamage. Fmthtr, ifrcqtX:SlCdby damage for winch the Company may be liable by virtue ofrhis policy or(iiz)iftidelOthe ~ ~rizcd representa!Jvt oftbe Co~any, the inSured c1allnant shall gtant its pennission. in eslalC: or inltrest,as ~ is n:~ ~ unrrlaJtdaI:lle.lf prompt notice shall nOt be given to the wntmg, for ~y aUlhorutd representative of the Co~~ to examine. inspect and ~opy all Compqny, then a;; lD the insuztd a1! I~ihty of !he Company shaU ~ with regard 10 the ma1tc1" or recl?rds, books.led~, checks.. -'.~r-'---- ~ ;"-'.,:,.-.-l!' the custody or ~I ofa lhiz:d JIlIlY. maIlers for w~lch prom~t ~t!ce ~s iequllcd; prOVided, however,that railure to l1)til)rthe Wh.ICb,~pcJtlmIlDlhtlossordmmge.AU ..".....'..:.' ck:sigrmcd85:ronfidenti.al by the I~ ICompanyshall U1noc:ase~tethcngh1soranyinsurcdamderthispolicyW1lcssthCCompanyshall be claJmant p'rovlded,1o the Company pursuant to lIDS Sectionsfnll 001 re disclosed to ottm lIlfess mire pn:judit:ed by1hefiu1urcandthenonly to the extent of the prejudice.. ~nable~udgmemofth.e Company, i! is necessary in the adminiSlmtion of the claim. Failure of the . DEFENSE AND PROSECUTION OF ACTIONS; DUTY OF INSURED insun:d cl~ to submit for _.~.....~.l urderoarh, pmdzr.e Olher~ reqI.IlStM informalion or CLAIMANT TO COOPERATE grant 1""...~,u..IO secure. ~~Iy necessaJ}' information from third parties as required in this paragr.Iph (a~ Upon wri.nen re~~est by the. insured and subject to tbe options contained in shall terz.nmate any liability of the Company under this policy as to that claim ectlon 6 of tbese CondItions and Stipulations, the Comparzy, at its own cost and without 6. OPTIONS ~ PA Y O~....i. ~...1SE SETI1..E a.AIMS; TERMINATION OF UABn.ITY ~easonabJe delay, shall. provide for.the defense of an insured in litigation in which any In case ofadaimurxkrlhis polICy, the Compmy shall have tbefullowingadditional options: hlrd pany.assens.3 claim adve~se to the title or tmrresr as insured, but only as to those staled (a) To Pay or Tender Payment orthe AmouDt orID5ul1Ince. . of.achOD allegmg a defect, lien or encu~brance or other matter insured against by To pa~ or lender paymeD! o~the amollllt of insurance under Ihis policy together with any costs. thiS pohcy. The Company shall have the fight to select counsel ofit:schoicc(~ealO attorneys fees and ~:rcpenses mcwredd')' the insured claimant, which were authorized b the Company. up 10 the time ofpaymenl or lender ~. r'"~ m.... and which the Company is obligated 10~. 1 I Upon the exercise by the Company of this option, all lia~h;Y and obliga.tions t.o the ,insured lion involving dIe-51: rights or remedIes. . '., under this policy; other than to make the payment reqUired.. ~ha!1 termmate, 1n~ludmg any Ifa payment on account of a claim does not fully. cov~r t~e IDssof_lh~ msu~ed "Jalmant. th~ 1 liability or obl.iganon to defend; prosecute, or continue ID1)' litiganon, and the polICY shall be Company shall be subrogated 10 thes~ rights and, remedies m the JI'OPOJtWn which the Co~ S l_~ ~_tc>theComp:anyforcancellatJon payrnentbearslOfheMloleamount of the loss. . hall "dlh- (b) To Pay orOtba'wise SdtIeWiIh Partie5()tbe:r1bantbelDsUrm ClrWitb thelnsural lf10ss slDuld n:sul\ from any acl of1he insured claimant. ~ staled abo~, that act s nOI VOl IS Claimant. ' poli~. but ~ Comp~y, in, that ev,ent, sha.11 be. requued to pay only I,hat part of any losses (i) to payor otherwise settle with olher parties for or in the name ofan insurtd clai:nant Insured agaUlst by thiS pol~cy :whu~h sh~1l excc:ed Jhe amount l.r a~y.. IDS! to lhe I my daim insured against uncb"tlUS policy, togedler \Wthany costs, attorneys' 1etsand apemes incurred Company by reason .0fh:..._~"".~~_by~inslmI,d~of1bc~sngtu~.~..~.~_-,- by the insuredtlaimant wbich~autborimtbythcCompmyupto Ihetimeofpaym:ntiIJ'IJ which the (b) Tbe Compaar's ~Igbts Against N.on~Jasu~ Obligpn:.. . Company is obligated to pay;,or , The CO!flpany.s',ng.ht of su~rogatlQn a$alnsr non;msure.d. obhgors~ball Clu5l~. sball (u)topayarothelwisesetdewiththcinsureddaimantthelossordmrageprovided for und~r this ~ludc, without'lmutatto!l- the ~gh1s of the Insured ~ .lDdenuub~ ~cs'. oth:r policles.of policy, together with any costs, aIIomcys' fees and expenses incurnd by the insured claunanl ~ or bonds'.no~ any tcnns .or .,_.:-,_....> contained m those ln$UUmCnts which I which were authorized by the Company up to the time of payment and which the Company is proVIde forsubrogatlon nghts by reason ofthls policy. obligatcd to pay. 14. ARBITRATION . Uponthecx~by.theCompanyofeithcrofthc~providcdfu~inpar8graphs(b)(i)or(i1), Unless prohibited by applicable law. either the Company or the insure~ may de~d the Company's o~hgations to the msured Ilrn:'erthl;s poh~ or1he. cl~m lossor.~ othcrthan arbitration pursuant 10 the ,Title Insurance Arbitratio~ ~ules of the Amencan A.rbitnlti~n the paymerrts requited to be made, shall tmnmaJc, iD;luding any liability OT obl'B'WOO to defend, Association. AroirzabJe meUm may include. but arc not hmned to, any controversy or claim prosecute or continue any litigation. . between the Company and the insured arising oul of or relating to this policy, any service of I ,. DETERMINATION, EXTENT OF LIABILl1Y AND COINSURANCE . the Company in connection with its issuance or the breach of a policy provision or olher This policy is a contract of indemnity against actual monetary lollS or damage sustaIned obligation. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of InslB3nCt is $1,000.000 or less shall be or incurred by the insured claimant who has suffered lem or damagl: by reason ofmattcrs imuIm arbitrated ar the option of either the Company or the. insured. All arbitrable matters when agamtbythispolicy aJXIonIyto the extent herein dcs.cribcd. tbe Amount of Insurance is in excess of $1,000.000 shall be arbitrated only when agreed to (a) The liability of the Company undcr this p:lIicyshaII ootcx=dtheleastof: by both the Company and the insured, Arbitration pursuant to this policy and under the I (i) the Amount of Insurance stated in SchcduleA; or, Rules in effect on the date the, demand for arbitralion is made or, at the option of the (ii) lhc difference between the value of the insured estate or interest as insured and the value insured, the Rules in effect at Date of Policy: call be binding upon, the parties, The award of the 'insured estlte oritm:n:st suijed 10 thedcfi::ct, lien or encumbrance insured.agains( by [his may incl~c attorncys' fees only if the laM oftbe stale in which the land is localed permit policy. . a couCt to award attorneys' fees to a prevailing pasty. Judgment upon the awanJ rendered by the (b) In the ~ the Amount oflmulance stated in Schedule A 81 the om: ofPoticy is less than 80 AJbitraf01(S) may be entered in any courl havin'gjurisdiction thereof. pertO'IIoftbcvalueoftheinsured c:sttteorinlcre:Sl:orthc full __~,..;.~_.....:...._ paid for thc IID1 whichc:'Io'eris The law of the silus of the land shall apply to arbitration under the Title Insurance 1 less. or if subsequent to the Dale of Policy an impmvemcnl is erected on lhc: land wbich inarases the Arbitration Rules. . value of the insured estate or interest by alleast20 percent over the Amount of InsUrance A copy. oflhe Rules may beobtainc:d from the Company upon request. stated in Schedule A, then this Poky is subject to the rollowing: . . IS. LIABILITY LiMITED TO THIS POLICY;' POLICY ENTIRE CONTRACT (i)...mcreno~u'-r:'-' _..__hasbea:i~aslDanypartiaJloss.~CompanyshallODly (a) This policy togelherwitball ~~:'__",___,~""J<-, if any, attached hereto by the Company isthc p:ryrhelosiJll.1'mtamthe~tba1thcamountofl~a1 DatcofPobcy bcars to the total entire'policy IlfId contnlCtbetwecn the'insUred and the Company. In interpreting any provision 1 vaI~eofthe Insured estate or IDterot at Dale of Po hey; or . of this policy, tlUs policy shall be construed as a whole. (u)whe:rea~_....._, _n_..' ~becn~astolll1ypmialloss, Ihe Company shaH o~y (b) Any claim of loss or damage, whether or not based on negligence, and which arises pay the loss pro rata ID the proportion tha1120 percent of the Arnowt of Insurance staled lt1 out of the statuS of the title 10 the estate or intemstcovercd hereby or by any action asserting such claim, Schedule A bc~ to the sum of the Amount oflnsunmce staled in SchtduIe A and the amount ex- shall be restricted to this policy. pc:ndcd forl.h~ Improve!f1Cnt . (c) No amei1dmc~1 of or endorsement to this policy.can be made except by 8 writing ~e provlSlons of .tI'll~ pamgraph s~1 f!Ol apply to costs, attomtys' fees ~ expenses for endorsed hclQJn or attac:hcd hereto signed by either the President, a Vice PresidenL, the Secretary. I' w~ch the ComJ?allY IS hable under thIS policy, and shall only apply 10 that porllon of any loss an Assistant SC<:tctary. or validating officer or authorized signatory or the Company. which exceeds, ID the aggregate, 10 percent or the Amounl of Insurance stated in Schedule A. 6 SEVERABILITY .' (c)TheCompallywiDpayonJylhoserosts,~.ftc:landc:xpensesinculTCdinaJ:cordance 1. ,. .... ..~.. . with Section 4 of these Conditions and Stipulations In the event any provIsIon of the- policy JS held Invahd Or unenforceable under applicable 8. APPORTIONMENT . . law, ~he.policy shall be deemed not to include that provision and all other provisions sbl!1I If the landdescrilJed in SchoduleA consists of two orrJlOlt pan:ds which me not used as a single sire, remaln:m full force and effect. 1 IIId a loss is esl8bIisbcd aJre:cting on: oonore of the parcels but not all. the loss shall be compUted 17. NO'J.1CE5, ~HERES~NT . . ..' . and settled on a pro rata basis as ifthe amount ofimurance under this policy was divided pro All nobCCS ~ to be gwen Ihc Co~ and any statemcm m wntmg required 10 be furnished rata as 10 the value on Date of Policy ofeacb separnre parcellD the whole, exclusive of any theCompanyshaJlinclwiethcnumberofthispohcyand shan be addressed 10 the Com.pany at: improvements made subsequent to Date of Policy, unless a liability or value has otherwise been agreed upon as to each pan::eJbythcCompanyandthcinsuratarthetimcoftheissumceof 1 thispolicyanjslmmf:!yanc;qm:ssstm:m:ntorbym~att:ichedl?lhispolicy. .. '~ 9. UMlTATIONOFLIABILITV '. OUoagoTdIe"""'-Comp;myofOngon (a) If the Company establishes the tide, Of l'\m1OVCS thc alleged defect, lien or Claims ~ encumbrance, or cures the lack of a right of access 10 or from the land, or Cures the claim P.o.1kix218 ofunmarkctability ofritle, all as insured, in a reasonably diligcrtt manner by any method. incIlding Pordaad,On:gon'f111m litigation and the completion ofany appeals lI1crethIm. il shaII have fully pcrlOnnecI its obligations with '1'__'" 0,...1.... _......~ ....A .....~II ~'I.B 1:~"'I_ r,..r......l.......,... ....-..- ......................1... .-TbY'I~ U;'event Of. ~. 'iitigation:'-in~i~ingljtigati~~bY-th. e c~-~pany or wilh the Company's consent, the Company shall hav~ no liability for loss or damage until there has . been a finafdclcmlination by a court of ........,.__.. jurisdiction, and disposifian of.aY appeals therefrom, adVerSe to the tide as insured. I (c) T~e co. mpany shall not be liable for loss .0' damagclo any insured for liability vo]untanlyassumed by the insured in settling any claim or suit without the: prior written consent ofthc Company. 10. REDUCTION OF INSlJRANCE;: REDUcnONOR TERMINATION OF LIABllJTY ADpa.ymcnlSmdcrthispo1icy,~paymenlSrnadcfurcosts,altmnC)'S'fees and expenses, I shall .reduce the aroo'unt .Of the insurance pro tanto. II. LIABILITI' NONCUMUlATIVE . It is expn::ssly lDlderstood that the: amount of insurnnce under this policy shall be reduced by any amoWlt thcCompany may pay under any policy imuring a rmrtgage to ~ch exception is taken in Sckdulc B or to v.iricli the inslifed has agreed, assumed. or takcn subject, or whiCh is lhereafter excculed by an insuml and which is a charge or lien on the estate or intcrestdescribed orrctCned IOmScheduJeA,and thcanXlllDtso paidshaU be deemed a payment under this policy to the insured O\V11er. . .' 12. fA YMENT OF LOSS (a)Nopa~shaU be mOOcwitholf producingthrl policy for~ofd1c-paym:m Uldess the IPO]icy has been losl or destroyed, in which case proof of loss or destruction shall be furnished to lhe satisfaclion oCthe Company. ' (b) Wb~~ liability. and .the exlcnl oflo55 or dmnage bas been definitely fixt:d in-.-....:...M_ with ItI:seCanditimsandS~llbons,1helossordmnagcsball be payable withinJO days thereafter. 13. SUBROGATIONlJPON PAYMENT OR SET11.EMENT (a) lbeCompany'sRigbtofSUbrog;1tion. ~~ the Company shlII have scl:IIcd BOO pOO a claim under this policy. aD righl of subrogalion I vestm tbeCompauy unaffccted by anylU:1 of the insured claimant. . The Co.mpany sllaIl be subrog~ed to and be entitled to aU rights and rmr:dies whicfI the insured claimant \WWd have had agamst any pctson Of. property in respect to the claim had this policy not been issued. Ifrequested by the Company, the insured claimant shall transfef to the f. '"I"" ry afl rights ~d rcmc?ics agai~ any person o~ propcny necessary in ."i1.. ". 10 pe rfect sngbtofsu~gahon. -T~elDsurcdclalmantsbaIl pennfldECompllllyfoStle .., '....'.. ",":.: orsetde the name of the insured cIaimarn ml to use the name ofw InSured daimmlt in any tmnsaCtion or 1i1i~ ._-.--'...--~-.- ~- 1 I.'n"';~ ,---. i?D3.J\}-\f= 1100,$ 12111) J* 3(,ril, . 4"3W>,--f" .3qclO, "If''f0110 '3'1t.~7()i) . I I I . . I . . I I I . . I AFTER RECORDING. RETURN TO: UNTIL A CHANGE IS REQUESTED, SEND ALL TAX STATEMENTS TO: Jeffrey H. Keeney, Esq. Tonkon Torp LLP 1600 Pioneer Tower 888 SW Fifth Avenue Portland, OR 97204-2099 United States Bakery PO Box 14769 Porthind, OR 97293-0769 WARRANTY DEED WILDISH INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, an Oregon cv.pv".lion, Grantor, conveys and warrants to UNITED STATES BAKERY, an Oregon Cv.pv".;';'on, Grantee, an undivided 48.39 percent interest in that certain real pwp...;f located in Lane County, Oregon, and more particularly described on Exhibit A attached hereto, free of all liens and encumbrances except those set forth on Exhibit B attached hereto. The true consideration for this conveyance is $1,019,816, (i) paid from proceeds of a tax -deferred exchange under Section 1033 of the Internal ReVenue Code, and (ii) paid to a qualified accommodator as part of a .tax-deferred exchange under Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON TRANSFERRING FEE TITLE SHOULD INQUIRE ABOUT THE PERSON'S RIGlITS, IF ANY, UNDER ORS 197.352. THIS INSTRUMENT DOES NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCill' llI~G TillS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES, TO DhlhKMINE ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ORs 30.930 AND TO INQUIRE ABOUT THE RIGlITS OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY OWNERS, IF ANY, UNDER ORS 197.352. DATED this 1st day of June, 2006. GRANTOR: wiLDISH INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, an Oregon corporation .)iViSiOn of Chief Depuly Clerk. _~"e Counly Deeds and Records 2006-038519 By Q~ /7 //jJ!LJ ~s A. Wildish, President . ,,,,1111111111111111111 1 JlIII II ''''1111111'' $51.00 08119002006003851~906~~ . 06/0212006 03:51 :41 PM tPR-DEED Cnl=l Sln=9 CASHIER 04 :30,00 $11.00 $10.00 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I STATE OF OREGON ) ) ss. County of Lane . ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on the 1st day of June, 2006, by James A. Wildish as President ofWildish Industrial Development Corporation, an Oregon corporation. . 0FRaAI.SfAl. UNDA L HEIIIE IfOTARY I'IIlIlJC -lIl8lOll COMMISSION 110. 3!l14lill MY ~ EllPtRElI 0CIlIllER29, 2lI09 ~~Jd,JP{~ ~~rZ;~blic for oregon My commission expires: '<3/2 Cj / t:J q . . I 000632\00194\681021 VOOI . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -, ./,.,,:.... ,. . , . . EAnUloII A . Legal Description oCParcel A Beimmng at the northwest comer of Lot 1, Block 2 ofWildish Industrial Tracts as platted and rec9rded in Book 56, Page 11 of the Lane County Oregon Plat Records; thence along the west lin~ of said Block 2 South 00"02'25" West 723.16 feetto the southwest comer of Lot 4, Block 2 of $id Wtldish Industrial Tracts; thence leaving said west line and running along the south line of said Lot 4, Block 2 South 89"57'35" East 183.25 feet to the southeast comer of said Lot 4, B1dck 2, said point being in the westerly margin of Nugget Way, 25.0 feet from, when measured at rj-ght angles to, the centerline of Nugget Way; thence leaving the south line of said Lot 4, Blopk 2 and fnnning along the westerly margin of Nugget Way South 00"02'25" West 166.26 feet and along the arc of a 70.00 foot radius curve left (the chord of which bears South 14"25'45" ~ 34.98 feet) a distance of35.36 feet to the southeast comer of Lot 5, Block 2 of said Wi1dish Indhstrial Tracts; thence leaving the westerly margin of Nugget Way and running along the south lin~ of said Lot 5, Block 2 South 61"06'00" West 152.59 feet to the southwest corner of said Lot 5, $lock 2; thence leaving said south line and nmning South 36"06'25" West 273.98 feetto a poiPt on the northerly boundary of the Ashland Line of the Southern Pacific Railroad right of way, said point being 30.0 feet northerly of, when measured at right angles to the centerline of theiAshland Line of the Southern Pacific Railroad right of way; thence along said northerly boUndary the Ashland Line of the Southern Pacific Railroad right of way North 53"54'33" West 14$.48 feet to a point marking the intersection of the northerly boundary of Ashland Line of the Sotithern Pacific Railroad right of way and the east line of the C.B. Sweet D.L.C. N~. 38 in To~hip 18 South, Range 3 West of the Willamette Meridian; thence along the east line of the c.B. Sweet D.L.C. No. 38 North 00"10'26" East 71.66 feet to a point marking the intersection of . theieast line of the C.B. Sweet D.L.C. No. 38 and a line parallel to and 88.0 feet northerly of the centerline of the Ashland Line of the Southern Pacific Railroad right of way thence leaving the east line of said C.B. Sweet D.L.C. No. 38 and running along the northerly line of said Ashland Lrn'e of the Southern Pacific Railroad right of way North 53"54'33" West 291.40 feet to a point which is 75.0 feet easterly of when measured at right angles to the "Y Line" of the South Pacific Railroad; thence along a line parallel to and 75.0 feet easterly of the centerline of the "Y Line" of the'Southem Pacific Railroad along the arc of a 500.00 foot radius curve right (the chord of which bears North 2"52'21" West 777.55 feet) a distance of 890.76 feetto a point marking the in~rsection of the easterly margin of the "Y Line" of the Southern Pacific Railroad and the south mal-gin of County Road No. 443, said point being 30.0 feet southerly of,. when measured at right an@es to, the centerline of County Road No. 443 as said centerline is established in C.S.F. No. 27798; thence leaving the easterly margin of the "Y Line" of the Southern Pacific Railroad and flIl1I1ing along the southerly margin of County Road No. 443 North 89"59'02" East 277.32 feet to . a wint marking the intersection of said southerly margin and the east line of the C.B. Sweet D.Le_ No. 38 in Township 18 South, Range 3 WestoftheW.il1amette Meridian; thence along the'east line of said c.B. Sweet D.L.C. No. 38 North 00010'26" East 6.77 feet to a point marking thd intersection of the east line of the C.B. Sweet D.L.C..N~. :38 and the south margin of County , . .1. Rotul No. 443, said point being 30.0 feet southerly of when measured at right angles to the ce~terline of County Road No. 443 as said centerline is established in the plat of Wildish Industrial Tracts as platted and recorded in Book 56, Page 11 of the Lane County Oregon Plat I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Re<iords; thence leaving the east line of the C.B. Sweet D.L.C. No. 38 and rllnnine along the soulh margin of County Road No. 443 North 64041 '10" East 243.99 feetto the point of beginning all in Lane County Oregon. Legal Description of Parcel B I Beginning at the northwest comer of Lot 1, Block 2 ofWildish Industrial Tracts as platted and rec~rded iIi Book 56, Page II of the Lane County Oregon Plat Records; thence along the west lin~ of said Block 2 South 00"02'25" West 426.66 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence Nofth 89"20'24" East 183.26 feet to a point on the west margin of Nugget Way, said point being 25.00 feet from when measured at right angles to the centerline of Nugget Way; thence along the we$! margin of Nugget Way South 00"02'25" West 298.74 feet to the southeast corner of Lot 4, BIdek 2 of said Wildish Industrial Tracts; thence leaving the west margin of Nugget Way and runhing along the south bowulary of said Lot 4, Block2North 89"57'35" West 183.25 feetto the soUthwest corner of said Lot 4, Block 2; thence North 00"02'25" East 296.50 feet to the True Pofut of Beginning, all in Lane County, Oregon. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I EAnInI.l B Permitted Exceptions. 1. Easement, inCluding the terms and provisions thereof, granted the City of Eugene, recorded December 15, 1967,.Reception No. 8194, Lane County Official Records. 2. Easements as shown on the recorded plat of Wildish Industrial Tracts, except that portion of the railroad easement along the Westerly bOlmdary of Block 2, vacated by City of Springfield Ordinance No. 6139; recorded April 5, 2006, Reception No. 2006-023042, Lane County Official Records. . 3. Easements for utilities over and across the premises formerly included within the boundaries of the vacated.railroad easement vacated by City of Springfield Ordinance No. 6139, recorded April 5, 2006, Reception No. 2006-023042 Lane County Official Records, if any such exist, as reserved therein. 4. Wildish Industrial Pm Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions, inCluding the terms and provisions thereof (but omitting covenants or restrictions, if any, based upon race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, familial status, marital status, disability, handicap, national origin, ancestry, or source of income, as set forth in applicable state, or federal laws, except to the extent that said covenant or restriction is permitted by applicable law) recorded February 29,1996, Reception No. 9613731, Lane County Deeds and Records. 5. Declaration of Easement for Access, Utilities and Provisions for Maintenance, including the terms and provisions thereof, recorded October 4, 2005, Reception No. 2005-078938, Lane County Official Records. . . . 6. Glenwood Urban Renewal Plan, including the terms and provisions thereof, recorded December 14, 2004, Reception No. 2004-095229, Lane County Deeds and Records. 7.. Modified Improvement A&",,-=ent InCluding Notice of Potential Assessment Lien, . including the terms and provisions thereof, between the City of Springfield and Wildish Industrial Development CO.1M..;';on, recorded June 6, 2005, Reception No. 2005-040666, Lane County Official Records. 8.' Public utility easement, inCluding the terms and provisions thereof, granted the City of Springfield, recorded June 6, 2005, Reception No. 2005-040668, Lane County Official Records, 9.' Public utility easement, including the terms and provisions thereof, granted the City of Springfield, recorded June 6, 2005, Reception No. 2005-040669, Lane County Official Records. 10.' Public utility easement, inCluding the terms and provisions thereof, granted the City of Springfield, recorded June 6, 2005, Reception No. 2005-040670, Lane County Official Recmds. . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 11. Public utility easement, including the terms and provisions thereof, granred the City of Springfield, recorded June 6, 2005, Reception No. 2005-040671, Lane County Official Records. 12. Public utility easement, including the tenus and provisions thereof, granted the City of Springfield, recorded May 5, 2006, Reception No. 2006-031288, Lane County Official Records. . ,..,. ,".". . ''',' I,' .'F()ti~d,atioh'~ngin~~tihg~ 'I.nc~. -.. .- I I I I I I I I I I I- I I I I I I I Geotechnical . In"vestig'ati6n' .. .'~. '. .... '. '. '. .,.' ".' ..' ~-' " " ,..'.. .,.,-, . '. ., I.. ." ,," ,,,..1.. ........ ...",.,.. .. ..........,.. ;...~. ".",;,..... "'~'''.' , . nJl.. "'-'. ",,' ".;... ..~" '''''' I, . ...."...., ......., ......." ",.". ....."..~ .........., ...""..... ""', ...,. ,III ."" ...... - . " - . . , ..... .... .. ~.. .:;. -. ,.'"' .- - . ".,,'.. -". '-. . . ", ,'; ,.\ "Williams BakerY'lv\;!b:C Site}' ..-, "c." : . , . , .' . - , . Sp.riri~field I.OrefjQn " . ""'. . Prepar~'d.fo~: < ~....- --~-~._- -. : '. '. ". ". :. '. .... YVildishjConstr~~ti()I{ ..Co~~arnl.~ EUQEH~eiOre$QM' ,". , ~ '. . :! " ; :: .: .. . - ".-- . ,~ '" '. :.," .., "r' ~: ' , . " . . '. . ". ." ., ' ,M~y,i'7;~005" .': ."\ . ,. '.' . '. ..... ' " ; .' .. .. ." . . -'. , .' ""'." ..... ,,:_:,.'::,:,,'- '.','.: ~.: I,. I, I I I I 1 I I I I I "'C'.I. )H\ :lfl ~!J; llliU) Foundation Engineering, Inc. Professional Geotechl1ical Services . . Randy H(edik . .. Wild ish C?nstructibri Company' P,Q. Box7428~.., '. . .'. Eugene, OR 97401-0428. ' ." '.' " "." , ..' .May 17., 20.05 Williams.Bakery.(WiCDSitel q ~oteclinic<ll;Jnvestig~tio~ Sptirigfi~Jcl,dregQn' .' Project20Sl023 ,'.. ..',..' D.ea"r Mr.' Hledil<.: We.haVe, completed' t~~. re~ues~edfoun.dationinvestigation for the . new. Wiiliams Bilkeryjil Springfield,oregon; -', . " t. '. . . ,', . -". '. .', , , Ourreport'jficludes .adesc;-iptkin of our work;.adiscussion of the site conditions, '.a su";'marycif labor~t~ry:.testing' Clri(j.a .qiscu~sion' of ehgine~hng:~halyses, ',',- -. ..... . - . ," '. >. "." ,I" ",. ". Recdrruneild<itions : for site ,prep!Jration, 'seis'mic design,.fouridationdesjgn and. coristni6ti~n;. arid: constructio~'()fpilverTjen'ts.areencldsed~ . . It'ha~beena ;pleasur~ assisting you .With thi.s jjhasl3 ~f yo~tpro'je<;:t., pieClse do not hel';itafe to contClct risifyd~ haveahYquestiof)s or if'you require furtl")er a~sistance. . " . . - '"". , . - i Sincerely;' , . . I" .-. -~OUNDA TION ENGINEERING;I~~~- -,--. .' .'. -', '.- -' " '....' '. .' I I I. I I I I .()~ J j? : . .' , .. L' . . ;Mj:..'....,.........../ . . 'fU~' . . ',,", " .,' . .-'. ,'-, . .-", , : . .' .. " ' . .. - . - , ..' '.. . . -. " . . .. . Me!. McQracken,P,E; . . '" c.. .. ...., - Proje.cLMana,ger . ....; . ( ~fJ:. . , ..,. Jon':lthan c: H~ffmili1 .' S~aff'~nginee-r.' ., ." , JGHIMJM/cs, enclosure .!-' '. 'EXf'IRES:i?!3fl;)/~, ,..'/ '., -- " .' . Popland . Corvallis 820 l'JW Cornell Avenue. Corvallis, Oregon 97330-45\7. Bus. (541) 757-7645. Fax (54\) 7.57-7650 .. I I I I I I I I I I '1-. I I I I I I I GEOTECHNICAL INVESTlGA TION WILLIAMS BAKERY (WIDC SITE) SPRINGRELD,OREGON BACKGROUND Williams Bakery plans to build a new facility in Springfield, Oregon, The site includes several parcels southwest of the intersection of 19th Avenue and Nugget Way. The :t 20-acre property is currently undeveloped and includes Tax Lots 1100, 1200, 1300, 3600, 3700, 3800, 3900 and the southern half of 4000. Foundation Engineering, Inc. previously conducted geotechnical investigations of the northern portion of the site for Wildish Industrial Development Corp, The findings of those investigations were summarized in two separate geotechnical reports. The northwest portion of the site is addressed in a report for Wildish Industrial Park North Site (Site A) dated February 7, 2001. The northeast portion of the site is addressed in a report for Wild ish Industrial Park North Site (Site B) dated January 19, 2001, We also prepared a brief memorandum dated September 28, 2004, summarizing geotechnical considerations for the feasibility of the project. The proposed development includes a :t 120,000 SF industrial building and associated parking and truck loading/unloading areas. The building will have a finished floor elevation (FFE) of 440.5 feet and will include dock-high walls at several locations, The foundations are expected to include perimeter strip footings and spread footings, We understand that some of the equipment will be supported on mat foundations. The design effort is being lead by Thompson Viavoda & Associates Architects (TVA). The parcel was owned by Wildish Building Co, (Wildish) who is conducting the preliminary site grading and building pad preparation, Foundation Engineering, Inc. was retained by Wildish to provide geotechnical services through the design phase. FIELD EXPLORATION We dug 8 exploratory test pits on February 16, 2005, using a conventional backhoe. The approximate locations of the test pits, as well as the previous exploration at the site, are shown on Figure 1 A (Appendix A). The test pits extended to maximum depths of :t 6 to 11 feet. Disturbed soil samples were obtained for possible laboratory testing, Undrained shear strength measurements were made on the test pit side walls using a Torvane shear device where it was possible, however, the soil was typically too friable to obtain representative test results. The soil profile, sampling depths and strength measurements are summarized on the appended test pit logs (Appendix B). Williams Bakery (WIDe Site) Geotechnical Investigation Springfield, Oregon 1. May 17. 2005 Proiect 2051023 WlJdish Construction Company I. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DISCUSSION OF SITE CONDITIONS Site Topoqraphvand Veqetation The site is relatively flat with ground surface elevations ranging from :t Ei. 437 to 440 over most of the proposed development area. The site also includes fill that appears to have been end-dumped in piles at various locations across the site. The fill .is comprised of various soils and construction debris. The northern portion of the site slopes up slightly to the adjacent road (19th Avenue E). Vegetation across the site is limited to grass and short brush, Scattered trees occupy the northern edge and western border of the property. Subsurface Conditions Subsurface conditions vary with location, The general soil profile encountered during our exploration includes: Fill. Stockpiled fill was noted along the southern and western portion of the site above native grades. However, our exploration at the northern half of the building area encountered fill material at various locations below the existing vegetated ground surface. The consistency of the fill varies with location and includes granular mixtures of sand, gravel, silt and clay. The fill material consists of sand, silt or clayey silt, similar to the surficial alluvium at some locations, Therefore, the contact between fill and native alluvium was not always able to be clearly identified. Topsoil. A topsoil layer was encountered in most of the test pits with the exception of TP-1 and TP-2, which contained surficial fill. The topsoil is ---typicaiiy-:t-j-to-2-reet-thick-and"'"consists-'or-uark-brown~iuw-tu-meuium-- -- - ... - plasticity silt to. clayey silt with some organics, The topsoil was damp and soft to medium stiff at the time of our exploration, Silt. The topsoil is underlain by medium stift," low to medium plasticity silt to clayey silt. The thickness of the silt varies, across the site from :t 1 ,5 to 6.5 feet, with depths as great as :t 7,5 feet encountered at the northern extent of our exploration (TP-3). This stratum typically grades to sandy silt within the . bottom :t 1 to 2 feet of the layer. The silt was damp at the time of our exploration, Sand, The sandy silt transitions to medium dense, fine to medium coarse sand below a depth of :t 3 to 7 feet. The thickness of the sand ranges from :t 1 to 2,5 feet and extends to depths ranging from :t 4 feet (TP-8) to 10 feet (TP-1). The sand was damp at the time of our exploration, Gravel. The sand and silt are underlain by dense to very dense, sandy gravel and cobbles. The gravel and cobbles are rounded to subrounded and fine to coarse. Cobbles as large as :t 10 inches in diameter were noted, The gravel and cobbles extend to the limits of our exploration (:t 11 feet), Williams.Bakery (WIDe Site) Geotechnical Investigation Springfield. Oregon 2. May 17, 2005 Proiect 2051023 Wlldish Construction Company .. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Ground Water Ground water was encountered in TP-l and TP-2 at depths of :t 9.8 and 1 0.5 feet, respectively. Based on our observation, we believe that the ground water table was located close to a depth of :t 10 feet throughout the site during our exploration. The water likely fluctuates seasonally and with periods of wet weather. FIELD AND LABORATORY TESTING In-situ Permeability Tests In-situ infiltration tests were performed at the site on July 19, 2004, to estimate the relative permeability of the soils within :t 1 to 2 feet of the .ground surface. The tests were conducted at two locations (P-l and P-2), The approximate test locations are shown on Figure 1 A. A :t 3-inch ID PVC pipe was installed in each test hole with the tip at or slightly below the desired test depth. The pipes were filled with water to saturate the soil at the test depth and the tests were subsequently conducted by recording the change in the water level over time. The soils encountered at the test depth in the explorations typically consist of medium stiff silt to clayey silt. These soils are consistent with the soils encountered in the other test pits throughout the site. The test data suggests an in-situ permeability of:t1.7xlO'4 cm/s at P-' and :t2.8xl0.3 cm/s at P-2, Based on the variability of the silt, we recommend assuming a nominal permeability of :t 1.0xl 0-5 cm/s for the silt which is expected in the upper :t 5 feet of the soil -profiie. Laboratory Testing Laboratory testing was limited to index testing .including natural water contents and Atterberg limits on selected soil samples to classify the soils and estimate their overall engineering properties. The test results suggest the surficial fine-grained soils consist of low plasticity silt and clay. Results of the laboratory testing are summarized on Table' C (Appendix C). DISCUSSION OF GEOTECHNICAL ISSUES Excavation Conditions The bulk of the site preparation has recently been' completed. Excavation is being conducted during wet weather months and exposing medium stiff silt and clay alluvium over much of the building pad, It will not be practical to compact these soils, therefore, the work has included measures to minimize soil disturbance throughout construction. The excavation work will require the use of a tracked excavator equipped with a smooth bucket operating outside the excavation area. Williams Bakery (WIDe Site) Geotechnical Investigation Springfield. Oregon May 17. 2005 Project 2051023 Wildish Construction Company 3. I I I I I I I I I I I ,- I I I I I I I The exposed subgrade will be susceptible to disturbance including softening due to exposure to wet-weather and rutting and pumping under construction traffic. Therefore, it will be critical to cover the excavated subgrade soils as soon as practical and to prevent construction traffic on the subgrade, Our exploration suggests that the soft surficial topsoil extends to depths of :!: 12 to 24 inches below grade. Therefore, we have assumed a nominal stripping depth of 12 inches will be required over the entire building pad area, We understand that this material along with the fill stockpiles will be hauled from the site. The stripping depth may be adjusted at isolated locations depending on the depth of the building pad fill, organic content of the soil, and consistency of the exposed soil. However, this determination will have to be made in the field at the time of construction. Our current and previous work encountered deeper fill deposits on the northern portion of the site, Therefore, approximately the north half of the building will require deeper excavations to mitigate the existing fill. Our exploration did not encounter extremely soft or organic deposits within the fill areas. However, the material is variable and does not appear to have had consistent compactive effort applied during initial placement. Therefore, we believe that it is prudent to remove the upper portion of the fill and construct a thickened building pad in this area. For purposes of preliminary grading, we believe that it is prudent to assume that the northern portion of the building pad excavation will extend to :!: EI. 435 to mitigate the existing fill. We anticipate that the actual depth required to remove unsuitable fill materials will vary over the excavation area. Therefore, excavation of the northern portion of the building will require continuous geotechnical oversight to evaluate the required depth of excavation to mitigate the fill material. Construction Access A c.::innifif"':::lnt \fnlllrTl&:l nf ....nn~tnl,...tinn t,.~ffir- ic ~;u7't;it:"in~t;Qrl_rl..lrin"_I"\r;oli........i~,=,r",,_<:,i+o__. ..__.~_~ -. --.-.----.v.... .', "':-..'. .-,,_. _.'.'. -'~' .,;....-- _.-.- ~.'-- ~'._".-'_.'-""',-,-....-..... .........,........"........ ..............::;lI ,...' ......... '" ...... 1 ......v grading to import the building pad fill and remove the existing fill materials from the site. Construction access in areas to be used for future pavements or structures may include a built up haul road to minimize disturbance to the underlying silt and clay subgrade. We anticipate that construction access will require a minimum of 2.5 feet of granular fill material over a geotextile fabric constructed over the stripped ground surface. Buildin.q Pad Section and Construction The building pad should be constructed as the work progresses to minimize the exposure of the subgrade to wet weather conditions, A subgrade geotextile fabric should be utilized to provide separation between the silt and clay subgrade and imported granular fill. We have assumed that 6-inch minus, bar-run gravel will be used to construct the lower portion of the building pad fill. The bar-run gravel may become overly wet and impractical to properly compact during periods of heavy rainfall. Therefore, work may have to be suspended during extended wet weather, Alternatively, a higher quality, crushed gravel or angular quarry rock may be used during periods of sustained heavy rainfall. Williams Bakery (WIDe Site) Geotechnical Investigation Springfield. Oregon 4. May 17. 2005 Proiect 2051023 WiJdish Construction Company I I I I I I I I I I I We recommend placement and compaction of a thickened initial lift of granular fill to minimize disturbance to the subgrade. The initial lift of gr~mular fill (bar-run gravel) should be placed in a loose lift, :!: 18 inches thick and compacted. Construction traffic on the initial lift of fill should be limited to compaction equipment and minimal truck traffic to continue placement of fill. Areas of repeated truck traffic should be built up to provide a minimum of 2.5 feet of granular fill over the subgrade. Additional lifts of granular fill should be placed and compacted in :!: 12-inch thick, loose lifts as needed. Adequate compaction of the bar-run gravel should be documented by periodic observation of the compaction procedure and proof-rolling of the gravel surface using a loaded 10 yd.3 dump truck or other suitable piece of construction equipment. The granular fill should be capped with a nominal 12-inch thick lift .of crushed % or 1-inch minus gravel. The crushed rock should be compacted to 95% relative compaction (ASTM D 698). ENGINEERING ANALYSIS We understand that the building is expected to have relatively light foundation loads, however, some portions of the structure may be required to support moderate equipment loads. It is assumed that the building area will be raised slightly above the surrounding ground surface to facilitate surface drainage. Bearinq Capacity We estimated the bearing capacity of conventional (i.e., spread or continuous) footings placed :!: 18 inches below the ground surface, on granular fill underlain by native soil. Torvane measurements were difficult to obtain due to the friable nature of the soil. One Torvane measurement was taken in the clayey silt and indicated an I Ilnrl"!:lIincrl eh.o-=a,. e+rcnl"l+h n-f ('1___1 +....f. 1')r:-:";.....':"-:-I_.........rl.~""7'-:-I..":';....-:--:l_....h~........_....+...,..O':".....+t...,.._...___ .-- . - --~~~i;;;~;~d-i~'~;;~;;. ;;"~'~~;;~i~~-;~~I~;;;~b~ ub~uarT~;' ~~'~;;u;~'~'''O:': "~~~~~a;;;~; suggest an allowable bearing pressure of :!: 2,500 psf with a typical factor of safety of 3 is appropriate for the new structure. This analysis assumes that the continuous (wall) footings will have a nominal width of 18 inches and will bear on a minimum of 12 inches of compacted granular fill. Spread footings should have a minimum width of 24 inches and be underlain by a minimum of 12 inches of compacted granular fill. In addition, we assumed that the granular fill will extend a minimum of 12 inches outside the footprint of the footing. Similar assumptions were made for isolated mat foundations. I I I I I I I Settlement We did not perform a formal analysis of foundation settlement because of the relatively modest foundation loads, the observed stiffness of the fine-grained soils and the presence of shallow gravels. We recommend assuming nominal values for total and differential settlements of :!: 1 inch and Y, inch, respectively, if site preparation and foundation design recommendations provided in this report are followed. Williams Bakery (WIDe Site) Geotechnical Investigation Springfield, Oregon 5. May 17. 2005 Proiect 205' 023 Wildish Construction Company I. I I I I I I I I 1 I Our analysis indicates that the new parking lot should have a minimum flexible pavement section consisting of a nominaL 3 inches of AC over 12 inches of base rock consisting of Select Fill. The base rock may be reduced to 9 inches in ancillary I' -.--'-ai'ive aisles and parking spaces, wnere larger venicies are not permitted. I I I 1 I I I Pavement Analysis , We conducted analysis for the truck driveway/loading dock and parking lot areas. The base rock sections in these areas' were constructed concurrent with the building pad over an uncompacted subgrade. We also conducted analysis to account for additional truck traffic on 19th Avenue. We understand that U.S. Bakery estimates for truck traffic include 21 triple-trailers (105,000 Ib/GVW) per day. We assumed a nominal 100 route trucks (12,000 Ib/GVW) per day would be used for delivery. Our analysis suggests that a section consisting of a minimum 5 inches of asphaltic concrete (AC) over 6 inches of base aggregate (Select Fill) and 18 inches of subbase (bar-run gravel) will be appropriate for the truck driveway and loading dock areas. If a rigid pavement is preferred, we recommend using a minimum thickness of 7 inches of Portland cement concrete (PCC). The PCC should be underlain by a minimum 2 to 4 inches of base leveling course over 18 inches of subbase, Based on the size of the proposed parking lot, we estimated a daily traffic of 400 cars and light pickup trucks and 2 medium size delivery trucks (36,000Ib/GVW). We also estimated 1 to 2 heavy trucks (80,000 Ib/GVW) per month to represent extreme loading condition (e.g. fire truck). An M, value of 10,000 psi was assumed for analysis based on our observation of sandy gravel subgrade material in the parking lot area. This M, value assumes that any soft to medium stiff silt soils would be removed. Analysis for a pavement overlay on 19th Avenue was based on the assumed traffic including the additional truck traffic generated from the new bakery. Our evaluation used traffic data for 19th Avenue provided by David Evans and Associates. The projected increase in traffic volumes suggests that the structural number of the pavement section would need to be increased by 0.43 to accommodate the additional traffic expected on 19th. Therefore, an overlay thickness of 1 Yz inches would be adequate to accommodate the increase in traffic at the current level of performance for the pavement. A 20-year design life was assumed for the analysis. However, a nominal 2-inch overlay should be planned at about 12 years, The Asphalt Institute (TAl) recommends overlaying flexible pavements when 60% of the structure life is used. Research has shown that overlaying pavements at that time is more cost-effective than a full-depth repair after the pavemet;lt has failed. The pavement should be inspected by an experienced engineer every 5 years to determine its condition and need for rehabilitation. Williams Bakery (WIDe Site) Geotechnical Investigation Springfield. Oregon May 17. 2005 Proiect 2051023 Wildish Construction Company 6. I I I I I I I I I I I .- ----- - I I I I I I I Retaininq Wall Design We understand that the proposed building will inciude dock-high walls that will aCt as retaining structures. Lateral earth pressures for these walls were estimated assuming at-rest (Ko) conditions. An equivalent fluid density of 55 pet is recommended for retaining wall design based on the assumed rigidity of the wall and the method of backfill compaction. This value assumes that the walls will be backfilled with Select Fill. Drained conditions were also assumed. We have assumed a minimum uniform surcharge' of :t 300 psf will be acting on the building slab adjacent to the retaining walls. Therefore, we recommend a nominal uniform lateral pressure of :t 1 30 psf be considered acting on the wall. RECOMMENDATIONS Material Specifications and Compaction Reauirements 1. Select Fill as defined in this report should consist of 1 or o/.-inch minus, clean (i.e., less than 5% passing the #200 U.S, Sieve), well-graded, crushed gravel or rock. We should be provided a sample of the intended fill for approval, prior to delivery to the site. 2. Granular Site Fill should consist of 6-inch minus sand, gravel or rock, or mixtures of the above that are free of plastic clay, organic matter or construction debris. It should' be understood that the use of sandy fill with rounded particles (i.e., bar-run gravel) may delay construction during wet weather if it cannot. be adequately compacted. We should be provided a sample of the intended fill for approval, prior to delivery to h . I t e site. . 3. Fine-grained Site Fill should consist of approved soil that is free of organics, construction debris or expansive clay. Unless approved by us, silts or clays should not be placed under foundation areas or under settlement-sensitive structures. 4. 2 % passing 5. Drain Rock should consist of 2-inch minus, clean (less than the #200 sieve), open-graded gravel or rock. The Separation Geotextile should have Mean Average Roll Value (MARV) strength properties meeting M 288-2000 Class 2 geotextile~ the of AASHTO requirements an The geotextile shall have MARV hydraulic properties meeting the requirements of AASHTO M 288-2000 (geotextile for separation) with a permitivity greater than 0.05 sec:' and an Apparent Opening Size (AOS) less than 0.6 mm. I Williams Bakery (WIDe Site) Geotechnical Investigation Springfield. Oregon 7. May 17, 2005 Proiect 2051023 Wildish Construction Company .' I I . I I I I I I I I' I I I I I I . 6. Filter Fabric should consist of a non-woven geotextile with a grab tensile strength greater than 200 lb., an apparent opening size (AOS) of between #70 and 100 (US Sieve) and a permitivity greater than 0,1 sec-', 7, Compact the subgrade, where recommended, and all imported fill to 95% relative compaction, The maximum dry density of ASTM D 698 should be used as the standard for estimating the relative compaction, Efficient compaction of predominately fine-grained' materials (j,e" subgrade) will require the use of a padfoot or kneading roller, Fine-grained soils may also require 'moisture conditioning prior to compaction to adjust the natural moisture content to within :t 2 % of its optimum value, Moisture conditioning may include ripping and aeration for soils too wet of optimum or ripping and wetting if the soils are too dry of optimum, Efficient compaction of granular fills will require a smooth drum, vibratory roller. Field' density tests should be r.un frequently to confirm adequate compaction of the subgrade and imported fills, Granular fills should be proof-rolled using a loaded, 1 O-yd3 dump truck or other approved vehicle, Efficient compaction of the section should be evaluated by an FEI representative. Areas of pumping or deflection observed beneath the truck wheels may be reworked, or overexcavated and replaced with compacted Select Fill and proof-rolled again, 8, Place and compact all imported granular fill in loose lifts not exceeding 12 inches to the standard specified above. Thinner lifts may be required if liqht or hand-operated equipment is used, An initial thickened lift is recommended for construction of the building pad fill over uncompacted subgrade. 9, Overexcavate all test pits that extend under buildings and pavements, Replace the test pit backfill with Select Fill placed in maximum 12-inch thick loose lifts and compacted as specified above, 10. Provide contractors with a copy of this report to review recommendations for wet weather site preparation and foundation construction, and the soil and rock conditions encountered in the test pits. We should be provided an opportunity to meet with the contractor prior to construction to discuss the site conditions and the contractor's approach to site preparation, Williams Bakery {WIDe Site) Geotechnical Investigation Springfield. oregon May 17. 2005 Project 2051023 Wildish' Construction Company 8. .' I I . . I . I I . I . I I . I I I I Site Preparation (Buildinq) Site preparation will occur during wet weather., Prepare the building area as follows: 11. Strip the existing ground as required to remove all topsoil. The stripping depth should accommodate a minimum 36-inch thick building pad. Dispose of all strippings outside of construction areas. 12, Overexcavate all test pits and replace the test pit backfill with compacted Select Fill. 13. . Excavate for utilities to the required grade, Inform contractors that water infiltration may be encountered at shallow depths during the winter months, based on the infiltration encountered in the test pits. Trenches should be pumped dry prior to placing the backfill. Trench backfill that extends beneath the new building, pavements and hardscapes should consist of Select Fill placed and compacted as specified above. Shore all excavations to protect workers from sloughing or caving soils according Oregon OSHA requirements for Type C soils. 14. Stripping during wet weather should be completed in sections with a hoe equipped with a smooth bucket to minimize exposure to weather and disturbance of the subgrade. The excavator should operate from outside of the 'excavation or from a thickened rock section extending into the excavation. Do not expose more subgrade than can be covered with granular fill the same day and do not compact the subgrade. Do not permit vehicles or construction equipment on the subgrade unless -tha'y'-Qle-S\JPPGited-vil-Ci-liI in; Iii i.;.i1h-cf-2 4~;ilche:;-G f-cGiTipacted-gi a il;;;~ oi-- ---.~..- fill . 1 5. Place a Separation Geotextile on the prepared subgrade that meets the requirements specified above, The geotextile should be laid smooth, without wrinkles or folds in the direction of construction traffic. Overlap adjacent rolls a minimum of 3 feet, Pin fabric overlaps or place the building pad fill in a manner that will not separate the overlap during construction. Seams that have separated will require removal of the building pad fill to establish the required overlap, 16, Place a minimum of 36 inches of granular fill to construct the building pad. If desired, the bottom of the pad may consist of Granular Site Fill capped with a minimum of 12 inches of Select Fill. Initial loads of rock should be placed by end-dumping adjacent to the excavation and spreading the rock onto the fabric u.sing a light dozer. Subsequent loads may be spread from a thickened access ramp that extends onto the fabric. The initial lift should be :t 18 inches thick and compacted using a large vibratory roller. Do not allow continuous construction traffic on the rock section until a minimum of 24 inches of rock is placed. Williams Bakery (WIDe Site) Geotechnical Inyestigation Springfield. Oregon 9. May 17. 2005 Proiect 2051023 Wildish Conslruction Company I. I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I Foundation Oesiqn and Construction 17. Design all continuous wall footings, isolated column footings, and mat foundations using an allowable bearing pressure of 2.5 ksf. This value may be increased by one-third for analysis using temporary live (wind and earthquake) loads, 18. Assume that all the buildings could experience total and differential settlements of :t 1 inch and :t Y, inch, respectively, if the footings are designed and built as specified herein. 19. Provide a minimum footing width of 18 inches for all continuous footings and 24 inches for all isolated column footings. Place at least 12 inches of compacted granular fill beneath all footings. The fill under the foundation (if not continuous) should extend at least 12 inches beyond the edges of all footings, Place the base of all footings at least 18 inches below the subgrade, except for thickened slabs or turned-down slab edges. 20. Design the building assuming the seismic parameters provided in- Table 1. These values are based on IBC 2003 (Section 1615), The corresponding response spectrum for the IBC 2003 General Procedure (Section 1615.1) is shown in Figure 2A (Appendix A), The response spectrum is based on the most recently updated USGS maps. The liquefaction potential of the foundation soils is negligible because the stiffness and plasticity of the fine-grained soils and density' of the underlying sands and gravels. ~-_.~-- - -- --- -- -- ----....Cii.Jit:-1-:-iBC--.2GGS~St:isi_._.h:;-Dt:si9n-r&i'&rrit:it::rs Site Class I Ss 5, F. F. ~I SMS SMl 50S SOl C I 0.65 0.32. 1.14 1.49 I 0.74 0.47 0.49 0.31 Notes: 1. 55.and 5, were established using USGS 2002 maximum considered earthquake spectral acceleration maps for 2 % probability of exceedence in 50 years. 2. F. and F. were established based on [BC 2003, Tables 1615.1.2(1) and 1615.1.2(2) using the selected 5s and'S,. values. . 3. 50S and 501 values include a 2/3 reduction on SMS and SM1 as discussed in IBe 2003 Section 1615. 21. Excavate for footings using a hoe equipped with a smooth bucket to reduce subgrade disturbance. The excavations should be deep enough to accommodate a minimum of 12 inches of compacted granular fill beneath the footing. Excavations terminating in native silts should have a minimum undrained shear strength of 0.4 tsf that should be verified by an FEI representative. Williams Bakery (WIDe Site) Geotechnical Investigation Springfield, Oregon 10. May 17,2005 froiect 2051023 Wildish Construction Company I I I I I I I I I I I 'Ih. I I I I I I I 22. Overexcavate any. fill encountered in footing excavations. The .overexcavation sho,-!Id extend to native silt or sand. Backfill the overexcavated areas using compacted Select Fill. 23. Dewater the excavations prior to placing backfill. This' may require the use of temporary sumps to keep the excavation dry during backfiHing. 24. Use a modulus of subgrade reaction, ks, of 250 kef for floor slab design. This value assumes that the slabs will be supported on a minimum of 12 inches of compacted granular fill underlain by undisturbed subgrade. Reinforce all floor slabs to reduce cracking and warping. 25. Provide a suitable vapor barrier under the slab that is compatible with the proposed floor covering and the method of slab curing. The type and placement of the vapor barrier depends on the method of slab curing and schedule for installing the floor surfaces.. Therefore, this item should be reviewed by the flooring manufacturer, contractor and project engineer and/or architect. 26. Provide a minimum of 12 inches of compacted select fill under all other isolated concrete slabs and sidewalks. Drainaqe for Buildin.qs and Loadinq Docks 27. Install foundation drains along the perimeter of the building, The drains should consist of 3 or 4-inch diameter, perforated or slotted, PVC pipe wrapped in a Filter Fabric. The flowline of the pipe should be set at least 18 inches below the ground surface. The pipe should be bedded in at least 4 inches of Drain Rock and backfilled to within 6 inches of the ground surface with-DrainRock. The entire mass ot-DrainRockshoula- be wrapped in a similar filter fabric that laps at least 12 inches at the top. 28, Provide subslab drainage under the deepest portion of the loading dock I pavement. The drainage system should consist,of two or more trenches running the width of the pavement. The trenches should be at least 12 inches wide, 24 inches deep, lined with Filter Fabric and bac~filled with Drain Rock. The top of the trench backfill should extend to the bottom of .the base rock. A 3-inch diameter, slotted or perforated pipe should be placed in the bottom of the trench and bedded in at least 4 inches of Drain Rock. 29, Provide clean-outs at appropriate locations for future maintenance of the .drainage systems. 30. Discharge by gravity flow into the. nearest storm drain. If necessary, discharge the water into a common sump and pump it into the nearest storm drain. Williams Bakery (WIDe Site) Geotechnical Investigation . Springfield. S'regon. May 17. 2005 Proiect 2051023 Wildish c;on~truction Company 11. I I I I I I I I I I I I-- I I I I I I I Retaininq Walls The following recommendations are appropriate for the design and construction of retaining walls: 31, Use an allowable bearing pressure of 2,500 psf for the design of retaining wall footings. 32, Provide a minimum of 12 inches of compacted Select Fill beneath the footing of retaining walls. 33. Provide drainage for the retaining walls as discussed in.ltem 27, Drains should be placed behind the face of the retaining wall, above the footing. 34. Use compacted Select Fill for the balance of the wall backfill. 35. Use an equivalent fluid density of 55 pcf to represent lateral earth pressure for retaining wall design. 36, Assume an additional uniform lateral load of 130 psf to account for surcharge loads acting on the retained soil. 37. Use an allowable coefficient" of friction of 0.45 to estimate the sliding resistance betWeen the retaining wall footings and underlying Select Fill. Subqrade Preparation and Pavement Construction (Wet Weather) The subgrade preparation for the truck driveway/loading area and the parking area will occur when the subqrade is too wet for compaction and to sUI2Port construction traffic without a thickened base rock section. We recommend subgrade preparation and pavement construction be completed as follows: 38. Strip the existing ground :t 6 inches, or as required to remove roots and sod. Dispose of all strippings outside of construction areas. 39. Excavate to the required subgrade elevation using a hoe equipped with.a smooth bucket. The excavation should extend to the depth required to provide a minimum of 24 inches of base rock and subbase. Overexcavate areas of plastic clay, organic soils, or materials that are soft or have been disturbed by construction traffic, Do not expose more subgrade than can be covered with the geotextile and base rock the same day. 40. Do not attempt to compact the subgrade. Haul trucks and other construction traffic should be staged from a thickened access ramp to protect the subgrade from disturbance. Williams Bakery (WIDe Site) Geotechnical Investigation Springfield, Qregon 12. May 17. 2005 Project 2051023 WiJdish Construction Company .' I I I I I I I I I I I' I I I I I I I 41. Place a Separation Geotextile on the prepared subgrade that meets the requirements specified above. The geotextile should be laid smooth, without wrinkles or folds in the direction of construction traffic. Overlap adjacent rolls a minimum of 2 feet. Pin fabric overlaps or place the building pad fill in a manner that will not separate the overlap during construction. Seams that have separated will require removal of the base rock to establish the required overlap. 42. In the truck driveway/load dock, place a minimum of 6 inches of base rock and 18 inches of subbase, The rock should be end-dumped from a thickened access ramp and spread using a light dozer. The initial :!: 18-inch thick lift (subbase) may consist of Granular Site Fill and the final 6-inch lift (base rock) may consist of Select Fill. Alternatively, the entire section may consist of Select Fill. 43. The employee parking area will consist entirely of Select Fill. Place a minimum 12 inches for the base rock section. 44. Proof-roll the base rock prior to paving using a loaded 10 yd. dump truck. Overexcavate and replace any areas observed to be pumping. Do not allow loaded trucks or heavy construction equipment on the finished base rock prior to paving. 45, Provide a minimum flexible pavement section of 5 inches of AC for truck driveway and loading areas. 46, Provide a minimum flexible pavement section of 3 inches of AC for the employee parking areas. 47. Provide a minimum pavement overlay of 1 Y:z inches of AC for 19th Avenue, 48. Compact the asphalt ce'ment pavement to a minimum of 91 % relative compaction according to the theoretical maximum density calculated from the Rice specific gravity. CONSTRUCTION OBSERV A TION/TESTlNG We should be provided the opportunity to review all drawings and specifications that pertain to site preparation, foundation construction and pavements. Site preparation will require field confirmation of excavation depths and mitigation of site fill. Mitigation of any subgrade pumping will also require engineering review and judgment. That judgment should be provided by one of our representatives. Frequent field density tests should be run on all engineered fill, subgrade and base rock, We recommend that we be retained to provide the necessary construction observation and testing. Williams Bakery (WIDC Site) Geotechnical Investigation Springfield. Oregon 13. May 17. 2005 Proiect 2051023 Wildish Construction Company I I I I I I I I I I I I- I I I I I I I VARIATION OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS, USE OF THIS REPORT AND WARRANTY The analysis, conclusions and recommendations contained herein are based on the assumption that the soil profiles and the ground water levels encountered in the test pits are representative of the overall site conditions.. The above recommendations assume that. we will have the opportunity to review final drawings and be present during construction to confirm assumed foundation conditions. No changes in the enclosed recommendations should be made without our approval. We will assume no responsibility or liability for any engineering judgment, inspection or testing performed by others. This report was prepared for the exclusive use of Wild ish Construction Company and their design consultants for the new Williams Bakery in Springfield, Oregon. Information contained herein should not be used for other sites or for unanticipated construction without our written consent. This report is intended for planning and design purposes. Contractors' using this information to estimate construction quantities or costs do so at their own risk. Our services do not include any survey or assessment of potential surface contamination or contamination of the soil or ground water by hazardous or toxic materials, We assume that those services, if needed, have been completed by others. Our work was done in accordance with generally accepted soil and foundation engineering practices. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. _.___ _.____.._~_ .__. _'...... __c_______-__...___ ._........,. -._._ - ------ ._.- ~ _... Williams Bakery (WIDe Site) G eo techni call nvest igat ion Springfield, Oregon 14. May 17. 2005 Proiect 2051023 WiJdish Construction Company .' . . . I . . . I . . ..1'.__.__ . . . . . . . Professional Geotechnical Services I Jill I fun Appendix A Figures .....- ~....~._-_._--~--- ---,~ - -~----,---_.-- Foundation Engineering, Inc. 1 -I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I '..... -.'::: - HJ;~,::f/ n; _ ~'~Lf::,Gt:;,'1':'::A~ '. "0J+- ' . ..' .. 4 .. q CHAIN L1..!M' r,.;/" i. '" 'i.~ /.:-- ~ --.ll~'" '=, -, = . , , ._....;...~..--_. P:l!Q): 1> , III ._ .~ .-<_Ii ,.,.."Jc::.=:J= L~_I ~:nm' ~ : ..........~I ...l.,.,_>~"-,_.:_ J". ;; ., ,! w..... .,.r::~- TP-4 ~'--'--'---- / .... " -~<~~"",,,' ,~ TP.3- ..._~~/ , I I \ -~r:;/ '~ TP-5 ~ w '" i/ ); ...<. ~",\. +> - ,~_.,.~ "~~Iii :~\ !) I) '\,.-- '--.--li-J4 - s' ~\~ ,1': ~ ,:Ii, ./" I \'\ J// ~ \: '\ " ; j \~, :;;.,...,i-- r/ , .. '.. .. '. NOTES 1 TEST PIT lOCATIONS WERE ESTABliSHED BY PACING AND ARE APPROXIMA TE ONLY 2 SEE REPORT FOR A DISCUSSION OF SUBSURFACE CO~IDITIONS. 3. BASE MAP WAS PROVIDED BY THOMPSON V/>,iVODA '" ASSOCI/ITES, ARCHI TECTS INC. , ~. FOUND A nON ENGINEERING INC. PROFESSIONAL GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES "i1 .. '>" ",/' Hi 1---- --.- ----- ;: 3'1.7JTC 39.2~ '0": ,t:;; ~ '" r0 l'<~ ~ " .31~ 6] BC n9.sa AC /"iiI TP-8 ~39.ea..l.C 438.74 BC\ 439JL.!.C: 1I38.6<1 BC ... .". /"iiI TP-3 III T-1 @ P-1 ., / '-,:., '" ~ LEGEND TEST PIT lOCATION AND NUMBER TEST PIT lOCATION AND NUMBER (PREVIOUS) PERMEABILITY TEST lOCATION AND NUMBER ,<~ II ., SCALE: 1" 120' ,60 120 240 DATE _2Il!i OWN. .JCt:!....- APPR. REVIS PROJECT NO. 20S1Q2J 'I SITE LA 'lOUT I AND TEST PIT L:OCATIONS WilLIAMS BAKERy'I(WIDC SITE) SPRINGFIELD, OREGON Ii 820 NW CORNELl. AVENUE CORVAUJS. OR 97330-4511 BUS (541) 757_7645 fAX (54!) 757-7550 FIGURE NO 1 '/ I Foundation Engineering, Inc. Williams Bakery Project 2051023 I 0.6 . 0.5 , , , . - - - - - - - '- - - - - - - - - - - - - -;- - - -- , ,. , , , , , , __.___6______________________ . .' , , , , , , ~ Cl - 0.4 c o :;: ell .. Q) , ! 0.3 I/------C------: ------,-------,-------.-------,------------ - " -"-- --..._~ J-. a; I I I Cl. 0.2 -------,-------,-----.- en , _ _ _ _ _L _ __ , , I I I I , I __._______._______,_______1_______,_______1____._ I I , I , I , , , , 0.1 , ____1_______ , , ,. , -+"-, ~_. " , ---,-------,-------,-------,------- , , , , , , , . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- , , , , , , 0.0 o 0.5 1 1.5 Period 2 2.5 (seconds) 3 3.5 4 Notes: 1. The Factored Design Response Spectrum is based on IBC 2003 using the following parameters: Site Class: C Ss ~ Damping = 5% F, ~ Section 1615 0.652 1.49 8,,; SMS = '0.315 0.74 Fa;: 1.14 SM. ~ 0.47 2. The Ss and S, values were established based on the USGS 2002 mapped maximum considered earthquake spectral acclerations for 2% probability ofexceedence in 50 years. Figure 2A. Design Response Spectrum Based on IBC 2003. Williams Bakery (WIDC Site) Springfield, Oregon < I. I I I I .' I I I -- _.- I I I I I I I I I I I ~ I~ Professional Geotechnical Services ! Appendix B . I Test Pit Logs .. _...:..- .__.._._..4 ~____.~__~ .,____. Foundation Engineering, Inc. I I I I I I I I ( , DISTINCTION BETWEEN FIELD LOGS AND FINAL LOGS A field log is prepared fl)r each boring or test pit by our field representative. The log contains information concerning - sampling depths and the presence of various materials such os gravel, cobbles. and fill, and observations of ground water. It also contains our interpretation of the soil conditions between samples. The final logs presented in this report represent our interpretotic-n of the contents of the field logs and the results of the laboratory examinations and tests. Our (ecommendotio~s orf~ based on the contents of the fino I logs and the information ~ontojned therein and not on the field logs. VARIATION IN SOILS BETWEEN TEST PITS AND BORINGS The finol log and related information depict subsurface conditions only at the specific location and on the dote indicated. Those using the information contained herein should be aware that soil conditions at other locations or on other dotes may differ. Actual foundation or subgrode conditions should be confirmed by us during construction. TRANSITION BETWEEN SOIL OR ROCK TYPES The lines designating the interface between soil, fill or rock on the final logs and on subsurface profiles presented in the report ore determined by interpolation and ore therefore approximat~. The tronsition between the materials may be abrupt or graduol. Only at boring or test pit locations should profiles b~ considered os reasonably accurate and then - ~--- . -.::::-:~i'-~:::-~~;:-~;:~:.:.::;-i""Ij:i:ic~-::''''-~:-'c-,-,0~.:5-~;'',:I-':0(,. I I I I I I I I I I I SAMPLE OR TEST SYMBOLS SH-3-4 i r L-Somple Number Boring or Test Pit Number Sample Type Top of Sample Attempt S - Grob Samples S5 - Standard Penetration Test Sample (split-spoon) SH - Thin-walled Shelby Tube Sample C Core Sample CS - Continuous Sample ~ Recovered Portion Unreccwered Portion (large circle indicates no recovery) Bottorn of Sample Attempt .A Standard Penetration Test Resistance equals the number of blows 0 140 lb. weight falling .30 in. is required to drive o standard split-spoon sampler 1 f1. Practical refusal is equal to 50 or more blows per 6 in. of sampler penetration. . Waler Contenl (%). ~ UNIFIED SOIL ClASSIFICATION SYMBOLS ,f' ..._._--~ FIELD SHEAR STRENGTH TEST G - Gravel S - Sand fA '- S;1l C - Cloy Pt - Peat W - Well Groded P - Poorly Groded L - Low Plosticity H - High Plasticity o - Org.onic Shear strength measurements on test pit side walls. blocks of sailor Shelby tube samples ore typically mode with T orvane or pocket penetrometer devices. !I -- II ( ! TYPICAL SOIL/ROCK SYMBOLS Lm Sane! ~ Silt .,.;. >...~ ~ Cloy ~ Grovel ...~ ~ m .' Basalt Siltstone -- I ('/~OOJ WATER TABLE 1 Water TobIe Location Dote of Measurement ;11 ~ Piezometer Tip Location (;/ used) .\ , / . , . ,'111111 11111', FOUNDATION ENGINEERING INC. d!lIl!IJ . PROFESSIONAL GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES SYMBOL KEY AND TEST PIT LOGS 820 HW CORNELL A~ CORV,I"WS. OR 97330-4St7 BUS. (541) 757-7645 FAX (541) 757-7650 BORING I I " , , I Explanation of Common Terms Used In Soil Descriptions ~eld - "~I i Cohesive Soils I Granular Soils Identification SPT I Suo e tsf) Term SPT I Term 1 I Easily penetrated se~erol inches o - I < 0.125 Very Soft I o - 4 I Very Loose by fist. I ! Easily penetrated severol inches 2 - 4 I 0.125-0.25 I Soft I 5 - 10 I Loose I I by thumb. I I Con be penetrated several inches - 8 I Medium St;ff I 11 - 30 I Medium I by thumb with moderate effort. 5 0.25 - 0.50 (Firm) Dense I Readily indented by;thumb but g - 15 0.50 - 1.0 I Stiff I 31 - 50 I Dense , I penetrated only with: great effort. I "Readily indented by, thumbnail. . 16 - 30 I 1,0 - 2.0 I Very Stiff I > 50 I Very Dense II Indented with difficulty by 31 - 60 I > 2.0 I Hard 1 1 I thumbnail. , I I r I I ----- I I l I I I I I I I I i ,. Undrained shear strength Term Dry Domp Moist Wet "I I I Soil Moisture Field Description Absence of moisture. Dusty. Dry to the touch. Soil has' moisture. Cohesive soils ore below plastic limit and usually moldable. ~----- Grains appear darkened. but no visible water. Silt/clay will clump. Sand will bulk. ore often at or near plastic limit. Visible water on larger grain surfaces. Sand and cohesionless silt exhibit dilatancy. Cohesive silt/clay con be readily remolded. Soil leaves wetness on the hand when squeezed. "Wet" indicates that the sail is wetter than the optimum moisture content above the plastic limit. SoilS ond .-1 .. -.. .--- r Term PI I Plasticity Field Test I Nonplastic 10 - 3 I Cannot be rolled into a thread. ~ Low Plost;city 3 - 15 I Can be rolled into a thread with some difficulty. I Medium Plasticity 1,5 - 30 L Eosily rolled into threod. l High Plasticity ;> 30 I Easily rolled ond rerolled into threod. -~ , i 1 1--~-;;i1Structu~-C~iteria I Alternating layers at least 1 inch thickl - describe variation. I Alternating layers at less than 1 inch thick - describe variation. I I I I Contains sheors and partings olong' planes of weakness." , r Term Soil Cementation Criteria 1 I Weok Breaks under light finger pressure. I' Moderate Breaks under hord finger I pressure. I, Strong Will not break with finger ) pressure. = ...--.--. r Term I Stratified ! Lominoted I I I [ Lensed ". Fissured Slickensides Blocky Partings appear glossy or striated. Break.s into lumps - crumbly. I / Contains pockets of different soils - describe variation. ., , ~ . I , ,111111 lilli', FOUNDA nON ENGINEERING INC. . . PROFESSIONAL GEOTECHNICAL SERYlCES COMMON TERMS SOIL DESCRIPTIONS I 820, Io!w CORNELL AVE. CORVAWS. OR 97330-"51' BUS. (5..1) 757-76"5 FAX (5..1) 757-7650 . . , .. . ~ . . a [ .. ~ - . ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ c. . ; ~ i E 0 . ~ ~ . c . 0 ;:; <5 ~ ~ 1. 5-2.1 2- 5-2-2 3~ 4- 5-2.3 5- 6- 8-2-4 7- 8- 9- 10- 11- I I ~ ~ ~ c. . c Comments - Surface; short grass, trace, fill. 1- I 2- 3- 4~ I 5- I 6- 7- I 8~ 9- , Ground water encountered at :1:9.8 feet. 10- I I 11- 12- I Project No.: 2051023. I , , Surface Elevation: 438.0 fe~t (Approx.) , I Date ofTest Pit: February 15, 2005 I I Comments - Surface: grass. I I I I I Ground water encountered at t1 0.5 feet. 12- I I J Project No.: .2051023\ , Surface Elevation: 438.0 fee;t (Approx.) Date of Test Pit: February: 15, 2005 I I .. . ~ a E ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ c. . .. ~ g . ~ . ~ ~ ;:; <5 5-1-1 . 5-1-2 . S~1-3 I -; ~ [ ~ Soil and Rock Description ~J~ 1 Dense, silty GRAVEL, some sand and clay; brown to grey, o':al;.~<{ damp, some high plasticity clay, fine to coarse, angular to ~iY~~ ro~~~~r~~,~~._ _ _ _ _ ____ ___ _ _ _____ Medium stiff SILT, trace gravel, cobbles and clay; brown, damp, low to medium plasticity, (possible fill). - :~':. -MedTu;o de;s;: SiltY SAND; fight brown. dam~ finet; medium -- "".~~I::."\ 0Q..8!]e_s'!.nQ, @llY'd..u!!!L _ _ _ ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ ro;&'?J'; Dense to very dense, sandy GRAVEL and COBBLES; grey, wet, ~ coarse sand, fine to coarse, rounded to subrounded gravel, \( alluvium ). I BOTTOM OF TEST PIT Test Pit Log: TP-1 WIDC Site Springfield, Oregon .. ~ E ~ ~ Soil and Rock Description f Stiff, clayey SILT; Itght brown, damp, medium plasticity, (fill) " .---------------------------- ~>.:::?;:'...:: Loose to medium dense SAND, trace sill; light brown, damp, fine ::.':"..:.;\/:::')1 to medium coarse sand, (fill). f?o~:;;,~oJ Med~m de;;-se: ;a;;-dy GRAVEL; grey to brown, damp, fine to -- ~~i"~ coarse sand, fine to coarse, rounded 10 subrounded gravel, (fill). :::'::::\?:::':::;:'::,:,j Mectlum de~se SAND; light brown:- damp~ finelo medium Coarse - ,""_~'."..". ~!:Ln~ @1!!:!v..!...u!!!L__________________ _ ~ ?2f:$:.~' Dense to very dense, sandy GRAVEL to COBBLES; grey, wet, f.:'@f: fine to coarse sand, fine to coarse, rounded to subrounded ;,6~ gravel, (alluvium). .4, f< o~ ~n-:;';~ BOTTOM OF TEST PIT Test Pit Log: TP-2 WIDC Site Springfield, Oregon I ii ~ " " . o I Comments - Surface: grass. 1- 1 2- 3- I 4- 5- I 6- 7- 8- g- 10-' 11- 12- I No ground water encountered to the limit of excavation. ; I I Project No.: 2051023: I Surface Elevation: 437.0 feet (Approx.) , Date oITest Pit: February' 15, 2005 I ;; . ~ ~ . I. " " Comments " E . . 0 ~ Surface: grass. 1- 5-4-1 I 2- 3- S-4~2 I 4- 5- 6- I 7- 8- I No ground water encountered to the 9- limit of excavation. : 10- I 11- 12- 1 i Project No.: 2051023 : , I Surface Elevation: 438.5 feet {Approx.} Date of Test Pit: February :15, 2005 I I 0 , g . . ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ " . . ~ ~ . ~ ~ . ~ u U 5-3-1 - $-3-2 . 0' ~ c ~ .!! ~ ~ 1; . ~ u . ~ . 0 u u ~ ~ OAO <; ~ ~ Soil and Rock Description ~ { > ~ ';'1 Soft to medium stiff, clayey SILT; dark brown, damp, medium to - _', I i lo~ Qf~t1fi~,ltQP~i!1_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ ,',' Medium stiff to stiff, clayey SIL T;light brown, damp, medium : " plasticity, (alluvium). ., . , '.)1 -j, Becomes sandy below ::1::6.5 feet. _ rL___________________________ ? ..:_;;'~J Dense to very dense, sandy GRAVEL, some cobbles: grey, wel, r'ei:~ fine to coars~ sand, fine to coarse, rounded to subrounded j8~. gravel, (allUVIum). BOTTOM OF TEST PIT Test Pit Loq: TP-3 WIDC Site Springfield, Oregon <; ~ E ~ ~ Soil and Rock Description ~ Soft, clayey SILT; dark brown, damp to moist, low to medium plasticity, (topsoil). -Medium stiff. clayey SiLT;li9htb~,;;,:-damp, medlUm P1a'Stidty, - (alluvium). Becomes sandy below :t3.5 feet. Medium dense'SAND; light brown, damp, fine to medium coarse sand, (alluvium). ~y~~ Denseto-ve-rydense:-Sandy GRAVEL to -COBBLES;grey~w--eC- ~ne to coarse sand. fine to coarse, rounded to subrounded I ravell {alluvium1. . BOTTOM OF TEST PIT Test Pit Log: TP-4 WI DC Site Springfield, Oregon I "0 " D . . c t ~ . .. ~ ~. "ii " . Comments "ii E " . " . . 0 G 0 ~ ~ Surface: grass. ~ 1- $.5-' 2- 5-5-2 3- $-5-3 , 4- 5- 5-54 . No ground water encountered to the 6- limit of excavation. 7- 8- 9- lO- ll. 12. I I I I I I I Project No.: 2051023 I Surface Elevation: 439.0 feet (Approx.) Date oITest Pit: February 15, 2005 I " . ~ " 1i . o "0 D . c E ~ . .. ~ "ii " . E " . . 0 . ~ ~ G 5-6-1 . I Comments Surface: grass. I 1- 2- 3- $-6-2 . I 4- 5, I 6- 7- 8- 9- I No ground water encountered to the limit of excavation. 10- I 11- 12- I Project No.: 2051023 I Surface Elevation: 439.0 feet (Approx.) Date of Test Pit: February 15, 2005 I ~ ~ ~ u "0 D t ~ Soil and Rock Description 'I' .' Soft, clayey srL T: dark brown, damp to moist, low to medium : .'. plasticity, (topsoil). ;, :;' -M~dTum ;tiff. dayey SiCT,trace sand;Tightbrown,da-mp, lOw - - . ,'. plasticity, (alluvium). : '. < ....B~cQm~~s~n.QyJlEl!.o~ !.2li.@~._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ _ _ __ .. .... "~": Medium dense SAND; light brown, damp, fine to medium coarse :/:'./:;...-; -s~nQ.. (gI1~vlu!!!L _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _...... r./Y '.':I?"~ o~.. - -.- Dense to very dense, sandy GRAVEL to COBBLES; grey, moist JJ:,~,:: 10 ..yet, fine to coarse sand, fine to coarse. rounded to ~;6~. subrounded grave~, (alluvium). ~Q,'tl BOTTOM OF TEST PIT Test Pit Loq: TP-5 WIDC Site Springfield, Oregon ~ ~ ~ u "0 D ;. Soil and Rock Description ~ Soft, clayey SILT; dark brown, damp, low plasticity, (topsoil). Medium stiff, clayey SILT; light brown, damp, low;to medium plasticity, (alluvium). ;j , " ........... J~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ __ _ __ ~ _ _ ~ _ ___ ~;:::}? '.:-:_:.'.:-' Medium dense SAND; light brown, damp, fine to medium coarse ;.:.;:.::.;: ~:.>, sand, (alluvium). . .-,,":. ."... ..,....':..::; . '!.' ~,": 9;Y~\S)j Dense tovery dense:-sandy GRAVEL to COBBLES; grey~mofst - ~ Ito wet, fine to coarse sand. fine to coarse, rounded to I \e..ubrounded "cravel. (alluvium\. BOTTOM OF TEST PtT Test Pit Log: TP-6 WI DC Site Springfield, Oregon .' . Comments Surface: grass. . . . . No ground water encountered to the limit of excavation. . . Project No.: 2051023 Surface Elevation: 440.0 feet (Approx.) . Date of Test Pit: February 15, 2005 . . Comments Surface: grass. . . . No ground water encountered to the limit of excavation. . I I Project No.: 2051023 I 7c 8- 9- 10-- 11- 12- February 15, 2005 Surface Elevation: 440.5 feet (Approx.) Date of Test Pit: I o . ~ ~ .. . c "0 . ~ ~ ~ ~ .S! . . ~ ~ 0. ;; . . ~ . u . ;; 0 u ~ ~ J $-7-1. . $-7-2 . 5-7.3 . 1- 2c 3- 4- 5- 6- 7c 8- 9- 10- 11c 12- . . ~ ~ .. . c "0 ~ E ~ ~ = . u - . 0. E . ~ 1- 2- $-B-l ~ 3c 5-8-2 4- 5- 6- ~ 00 ~ '-' "0 ~ ~ 00 Soil and Rock Description Soft to medium stiff, clayey SILT, some gravel;.dark brown, damp to moist, low plasticity, (possible fill). F' Medium stiff 10 stiff, clayey SrL T; light brown, damp, low plasticity, (alluvium). . . ~ , " : J Grades to sandy silt below :t4 feet. , , .:_~J ____________________________ <..:;:;:.~-t.:;:.::;..I:Medium de~se SAND; fight brown, damp, fine to medium coarse ;'/:.;.i??::~.~ sand, (!3lluvlum). :,::-..:::-::/.... ~;:~: Oense to ~ery dense~sandy GAAVEi to COBBLES;grey-:- moist - \to w.e!.. fine to coa.rse. sand, fine to coarse, rounded to I ~u_b(9.u_l1de~ gC~~~IJ_(~lIuvium). bUllUM UI'- tt=::il t-'IT Test Pit Loq: TP-7 WIDC Site Springfield, Oregon ~ 00 ~ '-' "0 ~ E ~ 00 Soil and Rock Description , Medium stiff to stiff, clayey SILT, some gravel; dark brown, , f' " damp, low plasticity, fine to coarse, rounded to subrounded ...,: ..9@~IJ~~i~E!Ji!!}._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Stiff, sandy SILT to silty SAND; light brown, damp, low plasticity, fine'sand, (alluvium). rO.:_:b-.~ -Oen;eto~ery -dense:-sandy GAAVEL;grey'" molSt-:- fineto-coa;:$e- t.:,:~9....:,...~:::':.~.; sand, fine to coarse, rounded to subrounded gravel, (alluvium). .:~tl..'?..'P,1 ' I BOTTOM OF TEST PIT Test Pit Log: TP-8 WIDC Site Springfield, Oregon .' · uillll ~ . I . . . . --'-~ --. --- . . I I I I I I I . Professional Geotechnical Services I Appendix C . " .. ,,,. I Laboratory Test Results Foundation Engineering, Inc. I' I Foundation Engineering, Inc. . Williams Bakery (WIDe 5ite) Project 2051023 I Table 1C. Natural Water Contents and Atterberg limits - --- -~--..,--- ------- I 5ample 5ample Natural Water U5C5 Number Depth (ft) Content (percent) LL PL PI Classification I 5-1-1 1.0 - 1.5 15.1 5-1-2 3.5 - 4.0 15.8 I 5-1.3 10.0 - 11.0 23.4 5-2-1 0.5 - 1.0 27.7 I 5-2-2 2.0.- 2.5 27.7 _._- .-.-~--- ---.- --~-_.. ------ ~- 5-2-3 4.0 - 4.5 4.9 I 5.2-4 6.0 - 6.5 23.9 I 5-3-1 0.5 - 1.0 33.4 5-3-2 3.0 - 4.0 32.9 47 27 20 CL I 5-4-1 1.0 - 1.5 29.2 5-4-2 2.5 - 3.0 32.7 I 5-5-1 0.5 - 1.0 30.4 44 28 16 ML 5.5-2 2.0 - 2.5 31.1 I 5-5-3 3.0 - 3.5 24.3 I 5-5-4 4.5 - 5.0 3.0 5-6-1 0.5 - 1.0 29.5 I 5-6.2 3.0 - 3.5 32.3 44 25 19 CL 5-7-1 0.5 - 1.0 22.2 I 5.7-2 2.5 - 3.0 32.0 5-7-3 4.5 - 5.0 29.4 I 5-8-1 1.0 - 1.5 27.1 I 5-8-2 2.5 - 3.0 23.1 I