HomeMy WebLinkAboutPacket, DRC PLANNER 11/6/2006
......
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD - DEVEL\
,NT REVIEW COMMITTEE
.'
DISTRIBUTION DATE:. November 6. 2006
TO:
Current Planning Staff: G. K'arp, S. Summers,~J..,Oonovan, Liz Miller, M. Metzger,' Kitti G.ale,
"l. Pauly, Tara Jones, Andy LimbirdJDav~ Reesor.-~ .
*Matt Stouder, Engineering ~ Public Works Department
.... .Les Benoy, Engi,neer Group, Engineering/Public Works
.. Chuck Gottfried, Environmental Services
Brian Barnett. Traffic Engineer/PE. Public Works Department (agenda only 2/02)
.Gary McKenney, Transportation Planning Engineer, Public Works Department
" Gilbert Gordon, Deputy Fire Marshall, Fire & Life Safety Department
Melissa Fechtel. Fire Agenda only
*Ed Black, Maintenance Manager, Public Works Dept.
*Pat French, Planner, Willamalane Park and Recreation District
"Ed Head, Springfield Utility Board (Electric)
"Bart McKee, Springfield Utility Board (Water)
Jack Foster, Springfield Utility Board (Energy Conservation) .
Amy Chinitz. Springfield Utility Board (Drinking Water)
Jim Henry, Central Lane Communications 911 (Subdivisions, Street name changes) _
Dave White. U.S.P.S. (Growth Mgmt. Coordinator) .
Dave Shore, Northwest Natural Gas (needs full packets for Partitions/Subdivisions)
~Celia Barry, Lane County Transportation.
. Thomas Jeffreys. Emerald People's Utility District (EPUD)
Jim Mann', Lane County Land Management (Urban Transition Zone]
George Ehlers, Lane County Sanitarian [Urban Transition Zonel (if applicable)
Tim Hanely. Rainbow Water District(" only if in the,North Spfld area) (if applicable)
Ralph Johnston, Lane Regional Air Pollution Authority (if applicable)
Dale Ledyard, Operations Chief, McKenzie Fire ~istrict (if applicable)
Joe Chavez, Comcast Cablevision (if applicable)
Debbie Crampton. EWEB'(electric) (" If in Glenwood)
Dick Helgeson/Mel Damewood. EWEB (water) ("'f in Glenwood)
Steve Moe, Glenw90d Water District (-*If in Glenwood)
Bill Grile - Development Services Director (agenda)
John Tamylonis, Economic & Community Development Manager (agenda)
Cindie Mott. Code Enforcement Inspector (agenda)
.. Dave Puent. Building Official (agenda)
Lisa Hopper, Building Services Representative (agenda)
.. Greg Ferschweiler, Keith Miyata, Brian Conlon, Gene Butterfield, PW Dept. (agenda)
"Craig Fitzgerald, Maintenance PW Dept
Deanna Buckem, Engineering Assistant, Public Works Oept. (agenda)
Police Chief. Jerry Smith. Police Department (agenda)
.. John Pearson, Build.ing Plans Review Engine~r
'Will Mueller, L TO
Mitch Moore, Quest Corporation (agenda
Robert Heyman, OoOT, State Highway Division (agenda)
Steve Barrett, Asst. Superin. of Operations, Springfield School District (agenda)
William Lewis, Financial Services, Springfield School District ( agend~)
Jack Moran. Reporter. Eugene Register-Guard (agenda) INCLUDE WEEKLY LAND USE INFO
Joe Leahy, City Attorney
Dennis Ernst, City Surveyor
A request for land use action, as described on the attached agenda, has been received by the Dev~lopment
Services Office. Specific concerns of your division/department/agency should be addressed. If you have.
comments or requirements of this proposal, please send them in writing to Karen LaFleur, Program Technician,
Development Services Department, 225 Fifth Street. Springfield. OR 97477.
If your written comments are riot received by Friday, Nov. 17, 2006, specific. concerns of your
division/department/agency will not be. addressed unless you attend, the "meeting on Nov 21, 06. The
Development Review Committee holds staff review m~etings .on Tuesday @ 8:00 -10:00 a.m. You should also
plan to attend the staff meeting on Tuesday if you have specific concerns so that the Planning Manager's
representative can discuss them prior to meeting with the applicant. If the Planning Manager feels it is necessary
for you.to participate in the public meetings he/she will let you know on Tuesday.
.. will receive a full packet
..
AGENDA
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
225 FIFTH STREET
Conference Room 615
Staff Review: November 21, 2006@ 8:00 - 10:00 a.m_
'1. '. SITE PLAN TENTATIVE #DRC2006-00085 THOMAS FOX/SKYVIEW 8:00-a.m.
Assessor's Map: 17-03-27-10 TL 3300
Existing Use: Vacant
Address: 104 West "Q" Street. .
.Applicant submitted plans to constructa:24,838 sq ft commercial center, Walgreen's (Parkway Center)
. Planner: DaveReesor . '. .
2. SUBDIVISION TENTATIVE #SUB2006-00062 RAKOCZY/R W HOMES 9:00 a.m.
Assessor's Map: 17 -03-25-23TL 1800, 1902 .
Existing Use: Vacant
. Address: "R" & 14th Streets
Applicant submitted plans to create a 7-lot duplex subdivision, Rakoczy Welker Village Subdivision
Planner: Linda Pauly
NOTE: THE FOllOWING AGENDA ITEM
SCHEDULED FOR. NOV14TH SHOULD BE
DRC2006-00083 Site Plan Tentative not the
case number SUB2006-00083
2. SITE PLAN TENTATIVE #SUB2006-00083 SIB DRC2006-00083 R KEEPERS 9:00 a.m.
Assessor's Map: 17-03-26-24 TL 1100
Existing Use: Residential/Vacant
Address: 1887 Second Street
Applicant submitted plans to construct (2) Commercial Bldgs with "B" occupancy and a second.
story apartment building. Total of buildings - 27.750 sq ft
Planner: Andy Limbird
1
City'of Springfield
'Development Services Department
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR'97477
Site Plan Application, Type I & II
. . .
Site Plan Review:
lZl
Site Plan Major Modification Type II: 0
,
. -.
.
Applicant Name: Bret Fox
Company: 'IThomas ,Fox Properties
Address: 1515 West Picket Circle, #400, Salt lake City, UT 84117
Applicant's Rep.; !Gary Reed Ip~one:1541-9571033
Company: IWeber Elliott Enqineers P.c. !Fax: .1541-9571033
Address: Ipo Box 10145 Euqene OR 97440
Property Owner: !Skyview, llC and South Plaza II llC !Phone: 1801-596771~
Company: '[Thomas Fox Properties ]Fax: . 1801-5967161
Address: 1515 West Picket Circle, #400, Salt lake City, UT 84117
Phone: 801-5967711 ext27
Fax: [801-5967161'
I
1-
1
I
1
Acres
[gJ'
I
1
]
I
o
TAX LOT NO(s): 3300
Sprinqfield OR 97477
ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17-03-27-10.
Property Address: 104 West Q Street
Size of Property: 2.19
. Proposed Name of Project: Parkway Center
Description of .
Proposal:
Square Feet
Development of a 24,838 square foot commercial center
# of Lots/Parcels: 1 Avg. Lot/Parcel Size: 95,391 sf Density: n/a du/acre
New Impervious Surface Coverage: 38,516 sf Bldg. Gross Floor Area: 24,838 sf
'I III
. -.
-. ." ..-
, . ~ -
Zoning: lMI/CC
Applicable Refinement Plan:
Location: City Limits [gJ
Associated Applications:
Pre-Submittal
Case No.: PRELax;- cxx510 Date:
Ca~e No.:D{LC.200li ---rtnKJ::~Date:
-;;
Application Fee: Postage Fee:
Page 1 of 10
Overlay District:
Plan Designation:
Urban Growth Boundary 0
I D-ll-Oc:'
10-2.7-06
Reviewed by:
(initials)
Reviewed by: . II' .
(initials) J:i...lA'_
Total Fee: 0
"
SO\~~6_ c'')- 11)/
I ;r te&1 .
<D"'';.. !ili:,~.._ .' . 'c...,.,.
..<-.L>.tI.r l-
'. . .;. 4300 j -I~ 1900 L<..t do
f ;-" . CITY- OF",Q,p~~I=IFI n 't 0-
, .. ~.;.;:::.:. '~~',:J; 20~!:~03:;~10~E-=~.300 -.1;.
-40 -N 8;'~1'e'D' 'W 1~19'- .r'p~.p.r'_.EAfr
J ,-,., -, ~T1iRIJ-2H6::t ~ 2000
.4200 ~ I '~ 1}"1
W.l (l). ~.
\108, Cu - I S 89"17'OO'.L .
,..._.~:.. '. ':;ilI 2117 w 2 "<",.,. "'-- ""-1-"6'-7" . \
I I)i~ .1.02 AG. ~~ 2122 i;~;(~lB)",. ~'- "
cl > w, g ni 0.50 AG. -'3 ni I. .... "'\ t.
t. .' 1 g ~ . 0 ~ ,8 ."\
'II- j/"l .'.' 0 N 89"29'01" '[0 ,...: 2119 \
. 2 ~ S B.., roo' E 22339'z ~~ 176.60' z ._~~"2 .'. \
11 ::. 15 ~ . 2121 . ~-i>''' 116.60' 60.00' 4:" 1.28 AG. '" .
d 0 z ~ 061 AG "",.@;<. b 2120 b . bl", S.351E2...:. ' \
'01 U ~" - . "~~SciO"32AC~ci:~ C'<~~ \
~1f" ].Pil-h7fl1lls,,;r 2en9J: ~ ~ l)h~~'/ ~ -1N;2~1~.&~!.33',,;J, '\
,~ <:I .- / VEST, 63\''1 - .
, '" ~ EAST; ~. EA;T ~. 2200. ~%..
, <{I in~---J~L_. -_____ _______-"_"-1>>J, r-J41J_P-S:-,-- __..;;,"
. '2300 .1200' 0 ---.-
~ ~ +t .' NDRTH'. ~. . '~
. .0:::1,'-.1.23 AG. ",,'j."" "JR' '6
-, =>:':! )'6' 240D)'.;P~,. .~l L1 ,.')...o~"f- <.~
c:;:( ., 1 AC. IJ_ 1".\1'10" [
Jj ,'~ ' O"~ VrST" 373';; ~. ~_B~~l~~~: N .~,,1_~::~;::. :'""::. .
, J "J'~~~~J~~~~i~.ii\~l .
".._ ~ I /-: ;,:;..' '"".:::~,:,:J"t;i,,1li';"''''':;;;':r'''';'':'~l':;:~::;;::::;,,;,!~'iJ:'";';'!':i ~ ~~.
C""/.:5lJ.?'f'- ""'2T/."",,'. ~~ I -'- 2600 ~~_~?~__._ u.l
7800 , 770.0 :" '.. - BOO .A",T_ ,'-49.1' Z . :x:-
i( . '.~" 2800 ="'_G',o.,.. i':'- ~
~ ' . ~C\.3p . . : \: I ~ .-J
2 ~. /:~;I 1 -, ~ t-'. ' .. ...we.T- 7ICl.99' . _~,. 0
f~J' *\ ~7'r~ t ~ 2900" ~I~ 30~~ ..~ ~ .~ ' (J1
~ E T. . .' .._____. . ~ f- ;- - - _ ~ ~ ~ ~
-r- /...;':""31,) ,,-.>.</,'. ~ ~4 L 1 O/G-f;;.f?Lth2. I"'.~I
I .' a:.~~"'.E /., '-*""." ~--" E4~-t'-~.~
I 9200 L .~....~?U ' 1 ~ 3200 . .
L', ...-..9300 ," . ~. ~ i ' .
IJR '}~J' ~ L ~i~~~~~~ '0 ~~' ~~ . r:;;~ 3500
j f: .~~ It! . 2- q1.:J 1) ~" ~ ~ >="-W'_'-:':" ~ g 3802 ~
I ~ II " ;..~ ' .' '.' ~... tW'F'r~~n1" l' "~-~'
I ~~'. '" J~ I '. .' t 3902 . I /YoUr i. Of21)
2. 'J 38)21. .' <;In
-~-..
, "".
~ ~f'i
.. 'i
.. .:.
q'
,
,...,......." b I.. ~
~, i....l. ,
l..~t('1.'1 ...
To-l't
,.. iq:.,,' /2-- z..,1..
0V&
.
'/ PLA SCi
SIiI3.2.oCi'i'
~~
.-r' -c;.--,,",,_ I
~~. J'~' .
""'~....,'~
. ---<"..
. . j-<r:s-..._
~ '. ..~.
~.~.:.
~4" . I'
#; ~....,' ,
~a.$ ~: .
3899
! ~
, IlIli "
.' 'N ~ ;
" .
.~. ~ SITE"
~ - -!!is-*;' ~ ~rL ~
I 3400' h",'j ,
. z
IE~L' {t
l~l.'
1il/'
, ~.
*
~ " ~
.... ."C
E..s/.
s,,'
17 03 27
. .. . ~f
.
",,;<.'..},
~~
M
~
~
""
~
','J
1:
::.'.'~--.,-....~~
~ '
--,~
;
,-
i
"()" .
C::TR TI' Ji"T'
\
\
,
,
r,!O.tVlP;iENT'SIGN
5h'/.N'D {~tn!-i ,~lPSI
".,,.,
t,n'/;:
:):JUP
'i'b:'ti/1i\ITS
/
\
\
\
\
..
~ ~
"''''''''''''"'
Bll(EPAlll
CROSS WID
<i=
,'., '
/
Parkway. Center Site Plan Approval (Complete Submittal)
. October 27, 2006 '.' .
,
'1/Application fee of$14750.25,
"
" 2/Copy of the deed and preliminary title report,
A copy of the deed and preliminary title repOli are en~losed.
The owners of the property are Skyview, LLC, a Utah limited liability company, as to
a 50% interest and Soutn Piazall, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company, as to a
50%.interest, as'tenants in common, . .
3/copy of the site plan in 8 \/2' x II".
Copies ofth~ design plans have been reduced and incorporated with this submittal.
, ','" - '. -
. .
, .
, 41 The right of, way permit application is not applicable as there are two driveway
appro'aches existing on Q Street, one ofwhich will be closed and one enlarged,.
51 The Stormwater Manage~ent Sy;temStudy has not been provided as we have
been informed it is not required in the.case ofthis development. The, drainage design;
utilizing a swale/detention system, reduces the intensity of runoff from this site from
predevefopment levels, Calculations ofthe intensity and depth of runoffin the
bioswales, 'compared to predevelopment levels have been included in'this submittal. .
, The Storm water Scoping sheet, prepared by The City of Springfield, is attached,
Hydrographs have been prepared for the Water Quality, 2 year and is 'year storm
events, The'maximum intensity predevelopment runoffs from the site are i.4 cfs and
2.18 cfs for the 2 yr. and25yr, respectively, The maximum intensity runofffrom the
. post, . . . 'i"
developinent site.are 1,25 Cfs and 1,88 cfs respectively,
','
.'.
A study' of the' existing st~rrri water syste~ is being submitted withthisapplic~tion,
.. It is in a spreadsheet format and is titled "Downstreanl capaci,ties of the Storm
System in Q Street" It has been acknowledged that, because of existing design
'circUmstances, the systein in Q Street surcharges from time to time and the system for
,'the Parkway Center has been designed with thjs fact in mind: '
. ." .... - , ..
Storm water from the building downspouts wilrbe piped directly to'Sioswales Aand.'
R StOrITlwater from the ,parking lot areas will generally'sheet flow at a I % grade to .
the drainage swales where it will proceed to the ditch inlets and the connection to the
30" sewer main,along Q Street.
Not all storm runoff from the parking areascan.be directedto the'bioswales, but
" about 86% dm be collected in this way. ' '" ", .
.-
2 ,
.
In the worst cilse.scenario,.if alLthe systems are overwhelmed, storm water will flow
from the site to thesuITounding'streets without flooding the building sites,
. ,- ,
This design meets the criteria of the Springfield stormwater management plan in the
following ways:
a) It minimizes the demand on the City's system and alleviates future costs oftrea:ting
the discharge by'reducing tpe flow from that which naturally occurs.
b) It promotes water quality by treating the discharge with vegetative treatment in the
bioswales or filtration' through the.catchbasins.
c) It preserves groundwater in that ai much runoff as possible in encouraged to
percolate into the ground.
d) It reduces the peak storm flow:
e) It minimizes the potential public and private losses due to flood conditions. .
t) It minimizes the stormwater discharge impacts on water quality and quantity by
reducing the peak flows. "
6/A revise'd Traffic Inipact Study is,being'submitted with this,application.
7/Eighteen copies of all the plan sefs~re being submitted.
. Existing Conditions: .' ,
A site assessment of,existing conditions has been prepared including a vicinitymap.
All existing site'fe~tUres except for two trees havebeen removed to prepare for the .
proposed development.
There are no watercourses shown'on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map'
that apply .to t1)is site. .' .
..
The 100 year floodplain and floodway boundaries do not apply to this site.
. The site isin the FEMA zone X which is outside the 500 year flood plain. .
The s,ite is outside th~ SUB zone of 20 year till?e of tr~vel.,
The soil types are indicated on the map and include soil types 19, Brenner Silty Clay
. Loam; type 34, Courtney Gravelly Silty Clay Loam; and type 119, Salem Urban Land'
Complex. "
. Site Plan: , .
A site plan has been prepared which shows the proposed buildings with locations,
dimensions, size and setbacks and distances between buildings.
There-is no fencing proposed. .
2
3
. . '
A prop~sed pylon siin h~s been proposed for the South East comer of the site 'and is
indicated on the paving and grading site plan, A monument sign is proposed for the
north side of the connection 10 Pioneer Parkway,
. . .
There will be nostoragdrreas or outdoor equipment.
Trash containers are indicated on the plan.
The required parking spaces have been calculated to be 83' and there are 85 spaces
shown on the plan. The typical space is shown to be 9', x 19'.
Directional signs and striping are shown,
Six disabled'parking spaces are indicated on the plan along with the required aisles
between spaces, '
, Loading areas for the commercial us~rs will be from the fr~nt of the buildings., '
Existing curb cuts.on QStreet are shown on the pian. The most Easterly of the curb
cuts will beciosed and the most Westerly will be modified as shown on,the plan.
, ..
There wiIJ.bestreet conn'ectioncoiistructed on the eastern boundary of the site to
access Pio'neer Parkway and modifications will be made to the'existing roadway to
provide a full access to Pioneer Parkway. ' ,
'v
Exterior lighting is shown on the plan (Sheet II).
,Ten bicycle parking,spac,es are required. Fourteen covered bicycle.parking spaces are
shown, on the site plan. ' " " , .
, "
, ';'
,. . .-.' , . '-'
, Transitfacilities are iocated about 400 feet East ~f Pioneer.. Lane C,ounty Transit has
an East~Westline (rflutes#18'and #19) along Q Street... ' '. '
, .... ',,' ,,: A
, A BRT station' is proposed for Pioneer Parkway, north ofthe Q Street intersection but
it has not been shown on ~he plan. ..' ' '
." ., . r,'
~. ."
. The Walgreens Building"will b~ constr~~t~d with Phas~ One. The clrive,thr6ughbank,
and strip center will be constructed as Phase Two, ..,.,,' " , '
" . , "
f....
A utilities plan has been'prepared showing'the connections to the sanitary and storm",
systems that are required for the development. .. ' , ' .. '
,The proposed access and changes to the access along Pioneer Parkway are shown on
the plans (Sheet 5).' " ','
-I:
, ,
The existing street lighting is shown on the site assessment plim, There are no
additional street lights proposed,' ' ,
3
, '
4 '
, '
Traffic control devices are shown and indicated as being relocated as required (Sheet
5).
Location of power poles, transformers and similar public facilities are shown on the
site assessment plan.. ' ,
Hydrants serying the 'area have been located and shown on the site assessment plan.
There are five hydrants capable' of serving the development that are within 500 feet.
One additional hydrant is proposed fo'r the northwest comer of the intersection with
Pioneer Parkway. It will be connected to the existing 16': main located on the west
side of Pioneer Parkway,
Sidewalk on the public right of way (on Pioneer Parkway) abutting the site is
proposed and is connected to the pedestrian system on the development site as shown
'on the plans,. ,
, Location and'sizing of the proposed private utilities is shown on the plans.
Comiection to the existing sanitary 'sewer is shown in the extremeSW comer of the
, property to' an existing stub which has not yet been physically located,
The storm sewer will be connected to existing stubs located on Q Street as shown,
, One remaining storm stub adjacent to Pioneer Parkway will not be used.
, Connections to the electric system, gas, telephone and cable systems have been
indicated where known~ '
, Grading and Paving Plans:
The grading plans 'have been prepared and show the roof drainage patterns and
, collection'system, All roof drainage will be collected and piped to the bioswales.
Surface drainage from the parking areas will also be collected via sheet flow in the
,bioswales and all drairiage'will be discharged to the:30" diam, storm main aLa rate"
which is reduced from the predevelopment runoff rates,
. . ., .
,',
Existingcontour lines are shown on the site assessment plan at a one half foot
intervaL
Spotelevationsare available but are not shownas they simply confuse thedrawirig.
The estimated fill required for the development is about 818 cubic yards,
, Landscape Plans: ' , ,
A landscaping plan has been prepared by Michael Minder, LandscapeDesign'
Professional arid has been included with this submittal. "
Architectural Plans:
4
"
, Architectural plans have been prepared by Mark McKechnie, AlA, and we include
the building elevations and perspectives with this submittal.
, .
Other: '
The development area iSBot within an Overlay District.
As grading and filling are proposed, a Land and Drainage Alteration Permit will be
~~~ '
A zoning report is included that shows the existing zoning for the Laura-Q Street
area. "
" .' .
A Bioswale calculation spreadsh~et is also included to show that the ,minirhum ,
contact time for sheet flow runoff is greater than the nine minute minimum required:
: .
. .,:
'. .'
\,
. ~,
, .'
",
-', "
, "
5
,',
:... _ .1
.5