The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutNotes, Work PLANNER 10/24/2006 ,.' " ~. . ~-- . TYP'E II TENTATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW; PRE-SUB.MITTAL C.HECKLIST S.PR..IN~.""~ ,jL.lll1 .. ,::... .-.. Project Name: Parkway Cen.ter Project Proposal: Commercial center consisting of3 buildings Case Number:' PRE2006-00070 Project Address: 104 W Q Street Assessors Map and Tax Lot Number(s}: 17-03-27-10 TL 3300 Zoning: LMI Applicable Refinement Plan: Gateway Refinement Plan Designation: LMI Pre-Submittal Meeting Date: . October 24, 2006 . Application Submittal Deadline:. April 9, 2007 Associated Applications: ZON2003-00036, ZON2004-00023, PRE2006-00070 CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TEAM [ POSITION .1 Proiect Manaqer [Transportation Planninq Enqineer I Public Works Civil Enqineer [ Public Works EIT I Deputy Fire Marshall [ Community Services Manaqer , REVIEW OF ,Planninq Transportation Utilities Sanitary & Storm Sewer . Fire and Life Safety Buildinq . . . APPLICANT'S DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TEAM. .Applicant Bret Fox' Thomas Fox Properties 515 West Pickett Circle, '#400 Salt Lake City,UT 84115. . [ 0/24/06. [NAME David Reesor Garv McKenney Eric Walter Matt Stouder Gilbert Gordon . Dave Puent . Engineer' Gary Reed ' .." Weber Elliott Engineers p,c.. P.O. Box 10145 Euqene, OR 97440 i' ., " PHONE 726-3783 726-4585 736-1034 736-1035 726-2293 726-3668 ,[ SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST " PLANNING o Application Fee discuss the applicabl~ fees o One additional copy of the Site Plan reduced to 81h"x 11" Complete Incomplete See Notes 15ii'l,,0 ~ 8 V2" X 11" Copy of Site Plan o Copy of the deed and a' preliminary title report issued within the past 60 days documenting ownership an,d listing all encumbrances. ' If the applicant is not the property owner, written permissiof'! from the property owner is required. Complete Incomplete See Notes 15ii'l",' , 15ii'l!ll4~ I22J 1~b'1,1'~~ , o Site Plan Complete, Incomplete See Notes , ~ [gJ- . [gJ [gJ1iIfj] ~' ;;;;; "= . .. ~ l'!ifl, t..:::EJ ~ ~ [gJ1iIfj] ~ ~ 'co 10/24/06, , Deed and Preliminary Title Report Prepared by an Oregon Licensed Architect, Landscape Architect or Engineer ' Proposed buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross Aoor area applicable to the parking, , 'requirement for the proposed use(s)), setbacks from property lines, distance between buildings ,Location and height of existing oj- proposed fences, outdoor equipment, storage, trash receptacles, and signs' Location"dimensions and number of typical, compact and disabled parking spaces; including. , aisles, wheel bumpers, directional signs and striping . . Lot coverage calculations of all parking and vehicular areas On-site loading areas and vehicular and pedestrian circulation Location of on-site exterior lighting Location, type and number of bicycle parking spaces Location of existing and proposed transit facilities 2 .Ii , . ,.'. - Phased Development Whereapplicablei the Site Plan application must.include a phasing plan indicating any proposed phases for development, including the boundaries and sequencihg of each 'phase. Phasing must progress in a sequence promoting street connectivity between the various phases of the development and accommodating other required public improvements, including but not limited to sanitary sewer, stormwater ' managemeht, water and electricity. The applicant must indicate which phases apply to, the Site Plan application being submitted, . Complete Incomplete See Notes 15ii'l~ L2!!J~il r;G+l,if, I.@ o Landscape Plan Complete Incomplete' See Notes [jj]. ~"'., .~.. b;; ,Ij] Ij] Ij] Phased Development Plan Location and dimensions of landscaping and open' space areas to include calculati?n of landscape ,coverage . Vegetative screening in accordance with SDC . Section 31,160 Written description, including specifications of the perll)anent irrigation system' Location and type of street trees '. List in chart form the proposed types of landscape materials (trees, shrubs,. ground cover)" Include in the chart genus, species, common name, quantity, " size, spacing and method of planting Notes: ' . . A copy of the Title report was not submitted. This needs to be 'submitted with the application. proposed building (First Tech -,4564 SF) does not have front setback labeled. All building' setbacks need to be shown ontlie plan. The outer property line should be clearly marked and shown on the. legend. As presented, it is not clear where.the property line ends and " ,,:,herethe ROW begins. ' ' . /.!dditionalcomments not,related to ,the completeness of the application: . The engineer's stamp is not signed. A signature should be present when application is . submitted. See comments from Public Works. ' 10/24/06 , , 3 P~.r;;!()()/-p(;()fjB ,r:~K PlE'o/"EfetlG-S ..5/n=: Pt-AN , ) /P/~4/()~' 1157,.A{?keNNIiTj/ , , SITE/PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST TRANSPORTATION t-l. ~ /Ri9ht-of-Way Approach Permit application must be provided where the property has / frontage on an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) facility. ' Complete Incomplete See Notes ~ ~ III Copy of ROW approach Permit Application o Traffic Impact Study-four copies of a study prepared by a Traffic Engineer in accordance with SDC Section 32.020(1)(c}. Traffic Impact Studies (TIA) allow the City to analyze and evaluate the traffic impacts and mitigation of a development on the ' , City's transportation system. Ih general, a TIA must explain how the traffic from a given development affects the transportation system in terms of safety, traffic' operations, access and mobility, and immediate and adjoining street systems. A TIA must also address, if needed, City, metro plan and state land use 'and transportation policies and objectives. Complete Incomplete See Notes 1iI ~ ~ o Site Plan Complete Incomplete See Notes ~ m ~ Traffic Impact Study Access to streets, alleys and properties to be served, including the location and dimensions of existing and proposed curb cuts and curb cuts proposed to be closed o Improvement and Public, Utilities Plan Complete Incomplete See Notes ~ 1i\!l ~ LiII Pi'iil ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ 1!m 7/21/04 Location and type of existing and proposed street lighting Location, widths and names of all existing arid proposed streets, alleys, dedications or other right-of- ways within or adjacent to the proposed development Location of existing and required traffic control devices 4 SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST PUBLIC WORK~,E~GINEERING o Site Assessment of Existing Conditions Complete Incomplete See Notes Ij] ~,M! / ... @&-(, wi iJ'>6~ ~~ 10/23106 ~o~~ 1ii71,'""', l!l!l!lI ~?~ I5ii'l lli!ill ~, Ij] Prepared by an Oregon, licensed Landscape Architect o~,'Engir]eer Vicinity Map The name, location and dimensions of all existing site features including buildings, curb cuts, trees and impervious surface, areas, clearly indicating what is remaining and what is being removed Required setbacks to the proposed new property lines for existing structures to remain on site The name, location, dimensions, direction of Aow and top of bank of all watercourses and required riparian setback that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map on file in the [)evelopment Services Department The 100-year Aoodplain and Aoodway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment or Letter of Map Revision The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in Article 17 of the Springfield Development Code and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map ,on file in the Development Services Department Physical features including, but not limited to trees 5" in diameter or greater when' measured 4 V2 feet, above the ground, significant clusters of trees and shrubs, riparian areas, wetlands and rock outcroppings Soil types and water table information as mapped and specified in the Soils Survey of Lane County. IS. Geotechnical Report prepared by an Engineer must be submitted concurrently if the Soils Survey indicates the proposed development area has unstable soils and/or a high water table 6 o Improvement and Public Utilities Plan must be in compliance with the regulations of SDC Articles 31;and 32 and must include the following information: .'_" Complete' 'Incomplete"-See ' "iJI">:':.";.'~:_:i';~;.a "Prepared by an Oregon Licensed Civil Engineer , ldi1i8.. c. .-" .,....~l."-"'-':.----,-::.::-.... ldi1i8" ~ ~ ~ o Grading and Paving Plan Complete Incomplete See Notes 10/23/06 ldi1i8 ~ ~ ~ ~ r:::x1,",', ~ ~*'- -~"~, "''',"' Ij] {;p,;;;f, ~ . All existing and proposed easements Location of existing and required power poles, transformers, neighborhood mailbox units and similar public facilities Location and width of all existing and proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways and trails Location and size of existing and proposed utilities on and adjacent to the site including sanitary sewer. mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV. Indicate the proposed connection points Prepared byan Oregon Licensed Civil Engineer , Planting plan prepared by an Oregon Licensed Landscape Architect where plants are proposed as part of the storm "Yater management system Roof drainage patterns and discharge locations Pervious and impervious area drainage patterns The size and location of stormwater management systems components, including but not limited to: drain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention ponds; stormwater quality measures; and natural drainageways to be retained Existing and proposed spot elevations and contours , lines drawn at 1 foot intervals (for land with a slope over 10 percent, the contour lines may be at,5 foot intervals) Amount of proposed cut and fill 7 . '.+ ~-. o Storinwater Management System Study-four copies of a study with the completed ,_..'..,.._' Stormwater,ScopingSheet attached, The plan, supportiRg calculations and.. ',,", '" ,docu~entation must be consistent with the Engineering Design Standards and , "";":'~''''''YPrOi:edures Manual. ' , '.'.. - .:!;....,. " .~ . . . ,>'; ~ ._~.,~~ ,~~ .:1+,"" ..;u~~1 _ .'- ." " Complete Incomplete See Notes ~.:. ,,~ .. .~,.' . P("r);';";'-'" ~' Scoping Sheet and attached Stormw~ter" Management System Study '...... ..,. Notes: 1. Engineer's stamp needs EOR signatures. 2, Provide dimensions for building and setbacks on site assessment plan. 3. Clearly show all existing and proposed utilities. Clearly specify / name utilities.. Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application: , 10/23/06 g Page 1 of 1 "'.. REESOR David From: GORDON Gilbert Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 8:30 ~M To: REESOR David Cc: GERARD Alan; FECHTEL Melissa Subject: PRE2006-q0088 Parkway Center: Dave, , I will be attending the Oregon Fire Marshals Association/Oregon State Fire Marshal , Conference and Roundtable at Canby on Tuesday, October 24th and will miss the DRC and Pre-Submittal meetings, . Here are my comments for this project: ' PRE2006-00088 Site Plan Tentative Thomas Fox/Parkway Center.. ' ,Address: 104 West Q Street' . . Existing Use: Vacant Proposal: Construct 24,838 square foot Parkway commercial center. Planner: Dave Reesor ' . Fire Department Comments: Plans complete, Access and water supply are shown., Heads up comments for DRC: 1. Reloc~tethe FDC c1~ser to the fire hydrant (10"20 feet). Would it be possible to run the FDC underneath the driveway apron connecting to Pioneer Parkway? I'm hoping that if this is possible, we won't be blocking additional fire apparatus by avoiding having to lay a hose line across the apron for the connection from the hydrant tO,the puin'per to the FDC. 2. Pavement surfaces shall supportan 80,000 lb. load (2004Springfield Fire Code section 503,2.3 and SFC Appendix section D1 02.1) . , , I , Gilbert R. Gordon Deputy Fire Marshal Springfield Fire and Life Safety 225 Fifth Street ' Springfield, Oregon 97477 , 541-726-2293 aaordon@ci,sorinofield.or,us , 10/19/2006 ANY REQUIRED ADDITIONAL MATERIALS, APPLICATIONS OR PERMITS , ' ,IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL STANDARDS/APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, THE APPLICANT 'SHOULD CONSIDER UTILIZING EITHER THE DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING OR THE PRE- APPLICATION REPORT FOR MORE DETAILED INFORMATION: Applicable Not ' Applicable ~ ~ ~ ~ Proposed deed restrictions and a draft of.any Homeowner's, Association Agreement' Additional plans and documenta,tion for submittal of a Cluster Subdivision proposal as specified in SDC Section 16.100(3) , , ,Riparian'Area ProteCtion Report For'properties .Iocated within 150 'feet of the top of b'ank of any Water Quality Limited 'Watercourses'(WQLW) or within 100 feet of the top of bank of any direct tributaries of WQLW ' ' A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be submitted concurrently if there are unstable soils and/or a high , water table present Where the development area is within an overlay district applicable, address th'e additional,standards of the overlay " district .' If five or more trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling Permit as specified in SDCArticle 38 [;:;;;;j l.3!tl I5ii'l l1:2SJ ~ ~. ~ r;::7,1 I22J "'~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "" A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon Division of State Lands must be submitted concurrently where there is a wetland , on the property :.. , Any required federal or state permit must be submitted , concurrently or evidence the permit application has been submitted for review ' , Where any grading, filling or excavating is proposed with the development, a Land and Drainage Alteration permit must be submitted with the land 'use application' : . Where applicable, any Discretionary Use, Va~iance or ' . MO,dification of Provisions as spe\=ified in SDC Article 10 or 11 "~ ~ 150'1. IL.'2J Ij] [;:;;;;j' L::!:J. ~ , 10/24/06' 12 ,. ,.." THIS APPLICATION IS: o COMPLETE FOR PROCESSING ~ INCOMPLETE AND NEEDS MISSING INFORMATION NOTED ABOVE ~,'",,~/CZd~ City Plarlner It:? ~ z...'1 - oC: , Date . , This is not a decision on your application. Springfield Development Code Sections 3,050(3)-(6) and Oregon Revised Statutes 227.178 require the City take final action on a limited land use decision within 120 days after the application is deemed complete. The 120- . day processing pej-iod for this application begins when 'all the missing information is 'submitted or when you request that the City proceed without the information. You must indicate by either signing this form or by submitting a written response to. the City within seven days of the date of this form asserting your intentions regarding the provision of the missing information, If you.indicate herein or in your written response the missing information will be submitted, then you have 180 days from the date the application was submitted for Pre-Submittal Reviewto provide the City with the missing information, If you refuse to submit the missing information, then upon receipt of the full application packet and processing fee, the City Will deem the application complete for purposes of starting the 120- , day clock and begin processing the application. No new information may be submitted after the start of the 120-day period unless accompanied by a request for an extension of the 120~day processing time, Upon receipt of a request for extension; the City may extend the 120'-day period for a reasonable period of time. The City may also require additional fees if 'the new information is submitted after the Notification to Surrounding Property ,Owners is sent out and a second notification is required or if the new information substantially affects' the application proposal and additional review is required, I, the owner/applicant, intend to submit all missing Items indicated herein 'to the City within the lSO-day timeline. _ ~/~. ~?"j -5J~lIli;-.-t.t-;J/f~ Own~r/ Applicimt's S'ignature I()-vl-('J~ , 10/24/06 13