Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNotes, Work PLANNER 8/8/2006 ,,"p 1 ), ~ ,,,.., ."..:"'"t....~ TYPE II TENTATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW, PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Case Number: PRE2006-00070 Project Address: 104 W Q Street Assessors Map arid Tax Lot Number(s): 17-03-27-10 TL 3300 'Zoning: LMI (11414'7/ '-t%) Applicable Refinement Plan: Gateway Refinement Plan Designation: LMI (W7/~~-'V i-{sE) Pre-Submittal Meeting Date: August 8, 2006 Application Submittal Deadline:' January 15, 2007 Associated Applications: ZON2003-00036, ZON2004c00023 CITY OF SPRINGFIELD pEVELOPMEN.T REVIEW TEAM: I POSITION I Project Manaqer I Transportation Plarininq Enqineer I Public Works Civil Enqineer 'I Public Works EIT l Deputy Fire Marshall ' " I Community Services Manaqer , REVIEW OF Planninq Tra nsportation Utilities Sanitary & Storm Sewer '\ Fire and, Life Safetv Building 'NAME David Reesor Garv McKenney Eric Walter Matt Stouder Gilbert Gordon Dave Puent I PHONE 726-3783 726-4585 736-1034 736-1035 726-2293 726-3668 APPLICANT'S DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TEAM Applicant Bret Fox Thomas Fox Properties 515 West Pickett Circle, #400 . ' Salt Lake City,' UT 84115 Engineer Gary Reed Weber Elliott Engineers P.c. P.O. Box 10145 Eugene, OR 97440 .J 8/8/06 ':1 SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION 'PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST PLANNING o Application Fee discuss the applicable fees o One additional copy of the Site Plan reduced to 8'h"x1.1.'~ Complete Incomplete See Notes ~ 8'12" x 11" Copy of Sit~ Plan o Copy of the deed and a preliminary title'report issued within the past 60 days documenting ownership arid listing' all encumbrances. If the applicant is notthe property owner, written permission from the property owner is required. , . Complete Incomplete ~ See Notes ~..q:r4ll j."'.0EF- -'"'~ o Site Plan Complete Incomplete See Notes 8/8/06 ~ ~ r;;;1 1.:1 ~, ~ ~ ~ /Pi;] ~ ~ Deed and Preliminary Title Report Prepared by an Oregon Licensed Archite'ct, Landscape Architect or Engineer . Proposed buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area applicable to the parking requirement for the proposed use(s)), setbacks from property iines, distance between buildings Location and height or'existing oj- proposed fences, outdoor equipment, storage, trash receptacles, and signs Location, dimensions and number of typical, compact and disabled parking spaces; including , aisles, wheel bumpers, directional signs and striping, . Lot'coverage calculations' of all parking and " vehicular areas ' On-site loading areas al'!d vehicular arid pedestrian circulation Location of on-site exterior lighting - . . Location, type and number of bicycle parking spaces Location: of existing and proposed transit facilities 2 Phased Development Where,appiicable, the Site Plan application must include a phasing plan indicating anY proposed phases for development, including the boundaries and sequencing of each phase. Phasing must progress in a sequence promoting street connectivity between the various phases of the development and accommodating other required public improvements, including but not limited to sanitary sewer,stormwater management, water and electricity. The applicant must indicate which phases apply to the Site Plan application being submitted. , Complete Incomplete Iiii'l ~ See Notes ~,~mYiL1 ,,," uc,,",4;jjj .;YH~~ Phased Development Plan o Landscape Plan Complete Incomplete See Notes ~ Location and dimensions of landscaping and open spa'ce areas to include calculation of landscape coverage . Ijj1 ~ ~ Ijj1 ~ ~ 'Notes: A title report was submitted butnot'a copy of the 'deed. Th'e narrative indicated that it was submitted - but it did not appear'to be in the file. ' The Site Plan needs to list outwhatthe setbacks are and the distances between buildings. As noted in the traffic section, a complete revised traffic study needs to be submitted with the appiication. Page 27 o(the Gateway refinement Plan indicates that commercial uses in the subject zone must have all traffic issues resolved in order for the LIse to be permitted. Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application: 8/8/06 3 ~ ?.&eF,u;rr(p-, (k>O 70 PO X' - W,41- ~ ~j()~ j" tJA. /VJ&;k€NNEY , SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST " , TRANSPORTATION N I ~Ri9ht-of-Way APpro~ch Permit application must, be provided where the property has / frontage on an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) facility. Complete Incomplete See Notes [11, m liJ' Copy of ROW approach Permit Application o Traffic Impact Study-four copies of a study prepared by a Traffic Engineer in accordance with SDC Section 32.020(1)(c);,Traffic ImpaCt Studies (TIA) allow the City to analyze and evaluate the traffic impacts and mitigation of a development on the City's transportation system. In general, a TIA must explain how the traffic from a given development affects the transportation system in terms of safety, traffic' operations,access and mobility, and immediate and adjoining street systems. A TIA must also ad~ress, if needed,City, metro plan and state land use and transportation policies and objectives. ' ' Complete Incomplete See " Notes 'fil cO ~ 'l\SiI laSt o Site Plan Complete Incomplete, See Notes fj} I*l ~ Traffic Impact Study ,Access to streets, alleys anq properties to be served, including the location and dimensions of existing and propose'd curb cuts and curb cuts proposed to be closed o Improvement and Public Utilities Plan Complete Incomplete See Notes ~ ~ ~ r&I 1m Ii .. , Location and type of existing and proposed street lighting , Location, widths and names of all existing and proposed streets, alleys, dedications or other right-of- ways within or adjacent to the proposed development " ~ ~ I~I (1-) Location.of existing and required traffic control devices (J) -r.:c .6 '12E ((u 11Ut.D 7121/04 ~) Q.\-o\l-l 11Z~o s em ':5 ( 9 N. M- . f:2l;;i\ll S l D No S 4 SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION PRE~SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST' PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING o Site Assessment of Existing Conditions Complete Incomplete See Notes IIlI IIlIIIII 'Prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect or Engineer 8/8/06 - llilliill IIlI IIlI Ijj1 l!lliJ - ~ IIlI ~O'~'," .'7*,",,,. ;yx IIlI Vicinity Map The name, location and dimensions of all existing site features including buildings, curb cuts, trees and impervious surface areas, clearly indicating what is remaining and what is being removed Required setbacks to the proposed new property , lines for existing structures to remain on site The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and top of bank of all watercourses. and required riparian setback that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map on file in the Development Services Department The 100-year floodplain and floodway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment or Letter of Map Revision The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in Article 17 of the Spririgfield Development Code and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file in the . Development Services Department Physical features including, but not limited to trees 5" in diameter or greater when measured 4 V2 feet above the ground, significant clusters of trees and shrubs, riparian areas, wetlands and rock outcroppings Soil types and water table information as mapped and specified in the Soils Survey of Lane County. A Geotechnical Report prepared by an Engineer must be submitted concurrently if the Soils Survey indicates the proposed development area has unstable soils andjora high water table 6 o Improvement and Public Utilities Plan must be in compliance with the regulations of SDC Articles 31 and 32 and must include the following information: Complete Incomplete See Notes UiI ~_ Prepared by an Oregon Licensed Civil Engineer ~ All existing and proposed easements Location of existing and required power poles, ,transformers, neighborhood mailbox units and similar'public facilities Location and width of all existing and proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways and trails Location and size of existing and proposed utilities on and adjacent to the:site including sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power,' gas, telephone, and cable TV. Indicate the proposed connection points 1ii00I, l!!!!ll o Grading and Paving Plan Complete Incomplete See' Notes ~.UiI 8/8/06 Iiii'l ~ Iiii'l ~ UiI Prepared by an Oregon Licensed Civil Engineer Planting plan prepared b'y an Oregon Licensed Landscape Architect where plants are proposed as part of the stormwater management system Roof drainage patterns and discharge locations Pervious and impervious area drainage patterns The size and location of stormwatermanagement systems components, including but not limited to: drain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention ponds; stormwaterquality measures; 'and natural drainageways to be retained , Existin'g and proposed spot elevations and contours lines drawn at 1 foot intervals '(for land with a slope over 10 percent, the contour lines may be at 5 foot intervals) Amount of proposed cut and fill, 7 .. o ,Stormwater Management System Study-four copies of a study with the completed Storm water Scoping Sheet attached. The plan, supporting calculations and documentation must be consistent with the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual. Complete Incomplete See Notes iji)1 ~ Scoping Sheet and attached Stormwater Management System Study Notes: I. Please provide and specifY a 7-foot PUE'along frontage of Pioneer parkway arid "Q" Street. Indicate size and type of all existing private and public easements on plans, 2. Please submit a signed copy oftbe revised stoimwaterscoping sheet, and comply witb all the pertinent check boxes, 3, Proposed swale does not meet City standards for vegetative stormwater treatment. To meet pretreatment requirements, an oil/filtration insert shall be placed in tbe outlet catch basin oftbese swales, The proposed french drain below bioswale does not meet standards, Please refer to tbe Portland Design Standards, Additional Comments not related to the completeness of the application: ], The size oftbe existing public storm and sanitary sewer pipes should be shown on tbe plan set. 2, Please note tbe existing tiGL problem in,tbe public storm system may affect tbis site (i.e. - surcharge of private system, , etc,), Tbe existing public system is known to surcharge; tberefore, the on-site design oftbis property should account for tbis, 8/8/06 8 G;lfc~v+Govk, ' p~E7c;o{rCC070 Tj,IO~5>Fo,..~ DefiA~ r:;;;...e 11M!? ~c. ( /tJ'-/ kJ,{j ,ff'02-f- /"-Vwe>y , SITE PLAN'REVIEW APPLICATION PRE-SU ~MITT AlCH ECKLIST FIRE o Site Plan Complete Incomplete, See Notes ~ ijj] ijj] On-site vehicular circulation o Improvement and Public Utilities Plan Complete Incomplete See Notes ~ Location of existing and required fire hydrants and similar public. facilities ~' ~, Notes: Additional Comments not related to the completeness, of the appliciltion: P~~~Jf~aq s-oi{(;O'/hkefr , ' :JOOL( 3fVi~f!e(j h~ d 503, 7.3 ~ 8fZC It/~J< DIO~.I, X-?(~ +~Vvt VU.J;i' -;1?S #d'r-r ;4f!~J;'I'- jJ, )d&e'&1/ w~~'- i7K~~Z. . " cr r_ ;J /__.~:&:. ,I ? ().~"<-'\.~. JfVZd{, +~ ~;-.J ~ _ , /l-~/_'7~,,_" ..".../J4 17,";J /J L ,A,,~. ._~~.."...~~(U~~~ ,~~J', " 4/6/04 11 . . .' - ANY REQUIRED ADDITIONAL MATERIALS, APPLICATIONS OR PERMITS IT IS THE APPLICANTS RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL STANDARDS/APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE APPLICANT SHOULD CONSIDER UTILIZING EITHER THE DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING OR THE PRE- APPLICATION REPORT FOR MORE DETAILED INFORMATION: Applicable Not Applicable ,!iil ~ ~ , ' , Proposed deed restrictions and a draft of any Homeowner's AssociatiQn Agreement ' Iiil ~ ~ , , ' Additional plans and documentation for submittal of a Cluster Subdivision proposal as,specified in SDC Se'ction 16.100(3) Ijj1 Ulli1] ~' , ' , " Riparian Area Protection'Report For properties located within 150 feet of the top of ,bank of any Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WQLW) or within 100 feet of the top of bank of any direct tributaries of WQLW, ' A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be' submitted concurrently if there are unstable soils and/or a high water table present ' Where the development area is within an overlay di'strict " applicable, address the additional standards of the overlay district Ijj1 ~ ,~ ~ ~y,_. f...-"!Z t0~ ~ ~ ... i405 ~ ~ ''''''" , ~ ~ ,,'-"-, ' ( If five or more trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling , Permit as specified in SDC Article 38 A wetland delineation ap'proved by the Oregon Division of State Lands must be submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the property . Any required federal or state permit must be'submitted concurrently or evidence the permit applic:ation has been submitted for review U\m ~ Where any grading, filling or excavating is proposed with the development, a Land and Drainage Alteration permit must be submitted with the land use application Where applicable, any Discretionary Use, Variance or Modification of Provisions as specified in SDC Article 10 or 11 , ~ Iiii'l ~ 8/8/06 12 . .' " THIS APPLICATION IS: D COMPLETE FOR' PROCESSING , ~ INCOMPLETE AND NEEDS MISSING INFORMATION NOTED ABOVE L~I1~N_;/~ ~ City Planner (J - 6' - 0(; Date ,This is not a decision on your application. Springfield Development Code Sections 3:050(3)-(6) and Oregon Revised Statutes 227.178 require the City take final action on a limited land use decision within 120 days after the application, is deemed complete. The 120- , day processing period for ,this application begins when all the missing information is subr.nitted or when you reque!?t that the City proceed without the information. You must indicate by either signing this form or 'by submitting a written response to the City, within seven days of the date of this form asserting' your intentions regarding the provision of the missing information. If you indicate,herein or in your written response the missing' , "information will be submitted, then you have 180 days from the 'date the application was submitted'for Pre-Submittal Review to provide the City with the miSSing-information. If you , refuse to submit the missing information, then upon receipt of the full application packet and processing fee, the City will deem the application complete for purposes of starting the 120- day clock and begin processing the application. No new information, may be submitted after the start of the 120-day period unless,accompanied by a request for an extension of the 120-day processing time. Upon,receipt of a request for extension, the, City may extend the' 120-day period fora reasonable period of time, The City may also require additional fees if the new information is submitted after the Notification to Surrounding Property Owners is sent otJt and a second notification is required or if the new information substantially affects the application proposal and additional review.is required. I, the owner/applicant, intend to subm'it all missing items indicated herein to the City within the 1.80-day timeline: ' ,Owner/Applicant's Signature , , 8/8/06, 13 .'