Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNotes, Work PLANNER 1/9/2009 .' I ;City of Springfield. Development Services Department 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 SITE PLAN RI;:VIEW PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Project Name: Willamalane Lively Swim Park Expansion Project Proposal: Two-phased development to include 2 picnic shelters, restroom, playground, dog park, natural path, sand volleyball court, and additional parking. Case Number: PRE2008-00074 Project Address: 6100 Thurston Rd. Assessors Map and Tax Lot Number(s): 17-02-34-21 TL 400, 1200; 17-02-27-00 TL 1004, 1101 Zoning: Public Land Open Space (PLO) Overlay District(s): NjA Applicable Refinement Plan: NjA Refinement Plan Designation: NjA Metro Plan Designation: Parks Open Space Pre-Submittal Meeting Date: January 9, 2009 Application Submittal Deadline: July 8, 2009 Associated Applications: DRC2008-00077 (Tree-Felling Permit) CIWN~[QE:seIUNGFJel!DJDEYEl!!qRMENrr!iREYIEWI,:nEAM . 'Bill. ,'\ . . ...b,' POSITION . REVIEW OF NAME PHONE I Proiect Planner Land Use Planninq Mark Metzqer 726-3775 I Transportation Jon Driscoll 726-3679 I I Utilities Eric Walter 736-1034 I. I Sanitarv & Storm Sewer Eric Walter 736-1034 I Deputy Fire Marshal I Fire and Life Safety Gilbert Gordon 726-2293 I Community Services Manaqer Buildinq Dave Puent 726-3668 t~eeI!!IC~Nrr~SmEYEl!qef!'lENT"REY;]!EW!iIi.E;("it~~"'~~,lIIIIIB'IIIi",,*,,*,_ Owner I Applicant Applicant's Representative Willamalane Park and Recreation District Branch Engineering Rebecca Gershow, Planner Damien Gilbert, P.E. 250 South 32nd Street 310 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Springfield, OR 97477 736-4052 746-0637 Revised 10/25/07 .J0vV\ q) () '1 ~~t- MvT6) \-\\ p~ TENTATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST PLANNING o Application fee - discuss the applicable fees o Copy of the Site Plan reduced to 81f2"X 11" Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) ~ 8 V2" X 11" Copy of Site Plan o Copy of the deed and a preliminary title report issued within the past 30 days documenting ownership and listing all encumbrances. If the applicant is not the property owner, written permission from the property owner is required. Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) ~ Deed and Preliminary Title Report o . Brief narrative explaining the purpose of the development, the existing use of the property, and any additional information that may have a bearing in determining the action to be taken. The narrative should also include the proposed number of employees and future expansion plans; if known. Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) R'<l ~ III Brief Narrative o Site Plan Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) @ FiSiil.=' l!9U Prepared byan Oregon Licensed Architect, Landscape Architect, or Engineer Proposed buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area applicable to the parking requirement for the proposed use(s)), setbacks from property lines, and distance between buildings Location and height of existing or proposed fences, walls, outdoor equipment, storage, trash receptacles, and signs Location, dimensions, and number of typical, compact, and disabled parking spaces; including aisles, wheel bumpers, directional sighs, and striping Dimensions of the development area, as well as area and percentage of the site proposed for buildings, structures, parking and @ IJ @ IJ" .=. "':co @ FiSiil ~ @ II!l Revised 10/25/07 @ FiSiil ~ vehicular areas, sidewalks, patios, and other impervious surfaces Observance of solar access requirements as specified in the applicable zoning district On-site loading areas and vehicular and pe'destrian circulation Location, type, and number of bicycle parking spaces Area and dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for common open spaces, recreational areas, and other similar public and semi-public uses Location of existing and proposed transit, facilities , @ @ FiSiil ~ @ II!l @ II!l o Phased Development Plan Where applicable, the Site Plan application must include a phasing plan indicating any proposed phases for development, including the boundaries and sequencing of each phase. Phasing must progress in a sequence promoting street connectivity between the various phases of the development and aCcommodating other required public improvements, including but not limited to, sanitary sewer, stormwater management, water, and electricity. The applicant must indicate which phases apply to the Site Plan application being submitted. Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) ~, III Phased Development Plan. o Landscape Plan Complete Incomplete @ IM1 ~ 1I!l' . :=:. - See Planning Note(s) III Drawn by a Landscape Architect Location and dimensions of landscaping and open space areas to include calculation of landscape coverage Screening in accordance with SDC 4.4-110 Written description, including specifications, of the permanent irrigation system Location and type of street trees List in chart form the proposed types of landscape materials (trees, shrubs, ground cover). Include in the chart genus, species, common name, quantity, size, spacing and method of planting r:;::;7I 22SI II&'! I225J ~ II&'! lZ:BiI fiikiljJ ~ Ill". . =~: - 1Il- 'Wiiiili0ia :~, ~~, .m III o Architectural Plan Complete Incomplete ~ ijj See Planning Note(s) Exterior elevations of all buildings and Revised 10/25/07 II&'! ~ structures proposed for the development site, including height Conceptual floor plans o On-Site Lighting Plan Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) ~ ijj Location, orientation, and maximum height of exterior light fixtures, both free standing and ,attached III ~ 1 Type and extent of shielding, including cut-off ?'..;.~.. angles and type of illumination, wattage, and luminous area III ~ 1 Photometric test report for each light source Planning Notes: 1. Do existing luminaires have full cut-off optics? New exterior lighting fixtures must have full cut-off optics. This should be reflected in the Lighting Sheet notes and or include a cut sheet showing the lighting type. Additional comments not related to ,the completeness of the,application: o Please be aware of the new SDC and application forms. Revised 10/25/07 ANY REQUIRED ADDITIONAL MATERIALS, APPLICATIONS OR PERMITS, IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL STANDARDS OR APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE APPLICANT SHOULD CONSIDER UTILIZING EITHER THE DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING OR THE PRE- APPLICATION REPORT FOR MORE DETAILED INFORMATION: Applicable Not Applicable II!l ijj II!l r;;t. ~ II!l II!l II!l II!l II!l Il II!l ijj II!l Il II!l II!l Il Revised 10/25/07 Where a multi-family development is proposed, any additional materials to demonstrate compliance with SDC 3.2-240 Riparian Area Protection Report for properties located within 150 feet of the top of bank of any Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WQLW) or within 100 feet of the top of bank of any direct tributar.ies of WQLW ., A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be submitted concurrently if there are unstable soils and/or a high water table present Where the development area is within an overlay district, address the additional standards of the overlay district If five or more trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling Permit as specified in SDC 5.19-100 A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon Division of State Lands must be submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the property Any required federal or state permit must be submitted concurrently or evidence the permit application has been submitted for review Where any grading, filling or excavating is proposed with the development, a Land and Drainage Alteration permit must be submitted prior to development Where applicable, any Discretionary Use or Variance as specified in SDC 5.9-100 and 5.21-100 An Annexation application, as specified in SDC 5.7-100, where a development is proposed outside of the city limits but within the City's urban service area and can be serviced by sanitary sewer THIS APPLICATION IS: o COMPLETE FOR PROCESSING o INCOMPLETE AND NEEDS MISSING INFORMATION NOTED ABOVE City Planner Date This is not a decision on your application. Springfield Development Code Section 5.4- 105 and Oregon Revised Statutes 227.178 require the City take final action on a limited land use decision within 120 days after the application is deemed complete. The 120"day processing period for this application begins when all the missing information is submitted or when you request that the City proceed without the information. You must indicate by either signing this form or by submitting a written response to the City within seven days of the date of this form asserting your intentions regarding the provision of the missing information. If you indicate herein or in your written response that the. missing information will be submitted, th~n you have 180 days from the date the application was submitted for Pre-Submittal Review to provide the City with the missing information. If you refuse to submit the missing information, then upon receipt of the full application packet and processing fee, the City will deem the application complete for purposes of starting the 120" day clock and begin processing the application. No new information may be submitted after the start of the 120-day period unless accompanied by a request for an extension of the 120-day processing time. Upon receipt of a request for extension, the City may extend the 120-day period for a reasonable period of time. The City may also require additional fees if the new information is submitted after the Notification to Surrounding Property ,Owners is sent out and a second notification is required or if the new information substantially affects the application proposal and additional review is required. I, the owner/applicant, intend to submit all missing items indicated herein to the City within the ISO-day timeline. Owner/Applicant's Signature Date Revised 10/25/07 TENTATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Engineer: Eric Walter Case#: PRE2008-00074 PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING o Site Assessment of Existing Conditions Complete ~ @ @ @ @ ~ @. @ Revised 10/25/07 Incomplete See PW Note(s) lEiiiI UEil lEiiiI l.eJ Il ~' FiSiil ~ ~ ~ ~"fu .' ~ " Prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect or Engineer Vicinity Map The name, location, and dimensions of all existing site features including buildings, curb cuts, tree's and impervious surface areas, clearly indicating what is remaining and what is being removed. For existing structures to remain, also indicate present use, size, setbacks from property lines, and distance between buildings The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and top of bank of all watercourses and required riparian setback that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map on file in the Development Services Department The 100-year floodplain and floodway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment or Letter of Map Revision The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3-200 and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file in the Development Services Department " Physical features including, but not limited to trees 5" in diameter or greater when measured 4 V2 feet above the ground, significant clusters of trees and shrubs, riparian areas, wetlands, and rock outcroppings Soil types and water table information as mapped and specified in the Soils Survey of Lane County. A Geotechnical Report prepared by an Engineer must be submitted concurrently if the Soils Survey indicates the proposed development area has unstable soils and/or a high water table o Improvement and Public Utilities Plan must be in compliance with the regulations of SDC Sections 5.17-100, 4.1-100, 4.2-100, and 4.3-100 and must include the following information: Complete Incomplete See PW Note(s) ~ ~ FiSiil," ~. Il ~ Iiii2'! l!!!ll ~ Iiii2'! ~ o Grading and Paving PI~n Complete Incomplete See PW Note(s) ~ Iiii2'! . 1!iI ~ 1 ~ @ ~ Il Ijij1 w I?j71 rEf:!J ~ 1iii2'!,','" ~ Il Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer Location and width of all existing and proposed easements " Location of existing and required power poles, transformers, neighborhood mailbox units, and similar public facilities Location and size of existing and proposed utilities on and adjacent to the site, including sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV. Indicate the proposed connection points Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer Planting plan prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect where plants are proposed as part of the stormwater management system Roof drainage patterns and discharge locations Pervious and impervious area drainage patterns The size and location of stormwater management systems components, including but not limited to: drain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention ponds; stormwater quality measures; and natural drainageways to be retained Existing and proposed spot elevations and contours lines drawn at 1 foot intervals (for land with a slope over 10 percen't, the contour lines may be at 5 foot intervals) Amount of proposed cut and fill o Stormwater Management System Study - provide four (4) copies of the study with the completed stormwater scoping Sheet attached. Th<e plan, calculations, and documentation must be consistent with the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual. Complete Incomplete 1}V1I,' ' ~ See PW Note(s) Scoping Sheet and attached Stormwater Management System Study , III Revised 10/25/07 PW Notes: 1. A storm water management plan was submitted; however, the storm water plan should include a proposed seed mix (or existing planting) for the water quality bioswale showing conformance with City of Springfield Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual Chapter 3 for Storm Water Quality. Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application: o Revised 10/25/07 TENTATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW APpLICATION PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Transportati.on Engineer/Planner: Jon Driscoll Case#: PRE2008-0007.1f Applicant: Splash Lively Park and Swim 'Center TRANSPORTATION o Right-of~Way Approach Permit application must be provided where the property has frontage on a Lane County or an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) facility. Complete Incomplete See Transportation Note(s) ~ III Copy of ROW Approach Permit Application o Traffic Impact Study - four (4) copies bfa study prepared by a Traffic Engineer in accordance with SDC 4.2-105 A.4. Traffic Impact Studies (TIS) allow the City to analyze and evaluate the traffic impacts and mitigation ofa development on the City's transportation system. In general, a TIS must explain how the traffic from a given development affects the transportation system in terms of safety, traffic operations, access and mobility, and immediate and adjoining street systems. A TIS must also address, if needed, City, Metro Plan and state land use and transportation policies and , objecti~es. . Complete Incomplete II&'! ~ o Site Plan 51 ~ See Transportation Note(s) See question on Additional comments. Complete Incomplete See Transportation Note(s) II&'! I22SJ Ill, ".,,-' ~,--' ,0 Improvement and Public Utilities Plan Complete Incomplete See Transportation Note(s) ~ II!l ~ Revised 10/25/07 fiikiljJ ~ !Z! ~ 1 2,3 Traffic Impact Study Access to streets, alleys, and properties to be served, including the location and 'dimensions of existing and proposed curb cuts and curb cuts proposed to be closed Location and type of existing and proposed street lighting Location, width, and construction material of all existing and proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways, and trails Location, widths (of paving and right-of- . ..~ fj:jiij l!!ll1 way) and names of all existing and, proposed streets, alleys, dedications, access easements or other right-of-ways within or adjacent to the proposed development, including ownership and maintenance status, if applicable Location of existing and required traffic control devices 1" .~~ r'. ~I Transportation Notes: 1. The existing gravel access road that connects the existing parking lot to the dog par k area needs a width dimension. 2. The note "Match existing Pavement" on the 20' path in the upper right corner of Sheet C5 conflicts with the "Proposed AC Parking" statement on the parking lot. . ,Please clarify if this is existing or proposed. 3. Pleas~ add dimensions to the length and width of the parking stalls as well as to the aisle widths. 4. 5. Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application: o How many trips a day do you expec~ the new site. to generate--vehicular and pedestrian? o The Pedestrian Crossing Study was not requested; rather a crossing was suggested. /' ......", , Revised 10/25/07 'TENTAtIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION , 'PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Deputy Fire Marshal: Gilbert Gordon Case #: PRE2008-00074 :1 ." FIRE o Site Plan Complete Incomplete See Fire Note(s) IX'11l I!!!!S! , I'iiiil, .1.!:W1ji On-site vehicular circulation o Improvementj'and Public Utilities Plan , Complete Inc9mplete See Fire :, Note(s) '~, ~ Location of existing and required fire hydrants and similar public facilities Fire Notes: 1., " , jl: . . Additional coinments not related to the , completeness of the, application: ' No furthef-fire ',d€!pElrtmen~ '::;:';, u, ;c;;l CL LI;I" L;" ,e; , ~[ocA~ FH ~ 'cl{;7,~ ~ {& ,,-c.I!;;.vlLC ~&f.e ~ ' j'. . " " ' .",', Revised 9/24/07 ' i~ .