Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNotes, Work PLANNER 1/26/2007 ; r " " , TYPE II TENTATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW, PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST ' Project Name: Oregon Urology Institute Project, Proposal: New radiation center building Case Number: PRE2007-00002 Project Address: 1457 'G' Street (. J Assessors Map and Tax Lot Number(s): 17-03-36-22 TL 6800 Zoning: GO Applicable Refinement Plan: Refinement Plan Designation: Pre-Submittal Meeting Date: January 26, 2007 Application Submittal Deadline: July, 16th, 2007 Associated Applications: ZON2006-00063 CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TEAM I POSITION ' I Proiect Manaqer I Transportation Planninq Enqineer I Public Works Civil Enqineer Public Works EIT I Deputy Fire Marshall I Community Services Manaqer REVIEW OF Planninq Transportation Utilities ' Sanitarv & Storm Sewer Fire and Life Safetv , Buildinq , APPLICANT'S DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TEAM, Applicant Oregon Urology Institute 2400 Hartman Lane ' Springfield, OR 97477 Owner: 'G' Street Urology Center LLC ' 1457 'G' Street Sprinqfield, OR 97477 1/25/07 NAME David Reesor Garv McKenney Jesse Jones Matt Stouder Gilbert Gordon Dave Puent Project Manager Terry Fitzpatrick G Street Urology Center LLC , 1457 G Street Springfield, OR 97477, f": . 'PHONE 726-3783 726-4585 736-1034 736-1035 726-2293 726-3668 ,\ ~ " SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST PLANNING, o Application Fee discuss the applicable fees ,'0 One additional copy of the Site Plan reduced to 81fz"?, 11", Complete Incomplete See Notes fjI,fjliIIJ 8 V2" x 11" Copy of Site Plan o Copy of the deed and a preliminary title report issued within the past 60 days' documenting ownership and listing all encumbrances. If the applicant is not the property owner, written permission from the property owner is required. ' Complete Incomplete, , ' Iiiiii1 ~~ See Notes liiilm- ~!W_. , 0' Site Plan Complete Incomplete "~ ,";' ,,' ...., .' , , 1ZfJ_ ~"" . ..... . , .~ . .'- - "it.. . , ' .' 1/25/01' r: .' ~ See Notes '1ii1l~ .If!!!J~ 'ren [1!f Iii1l ,l!!1 ,~.,." ", .,' ~"@ -!X;/ ~, ren ~ . '. ," ';; >'. ~ 1m! [ji " , . .,. '. ". ,. ""-. -' "'." ", Deed, and Preliminary Title Report Prepared ~y an Oregon Licensed Architect, Landscape Architect or Engineer Proposed buildings: location, dimensions, size . (gross floor area applicable to the parking' 'requirement for the proposed use(s)), setpacks from property lines, distance between buildings , ' Location and height of existing or proposed fences, outdoor equipment; storage, trash receptacles, and ~gns, _ , Location, dimensions and number of typical, compact anddisabled parking ,spaces; including aisles, wheel bumpers, directional signs and striping , Lot coverage calculations ,of all parking and, vehicular areas ' ' , ' , On-site loading areas and vehicular and pedestrian' , circulation Location 'of ,cin~site exterior lighting, Location, 'type and number of bicycle parking spaces 'Location of existing and proposed transit facilities ......: ' 2 . <.". Phased Development Where applicable, the Site Plan application must include a phasing plan indicating any proposed phases, for development, including the boundaries and sequencing of each phase. Pha?ing must progress in a sequence promoting street connectivity between the various phases of the deyelopment and accommodating other required public improvements, including but not limited to sanitary sewer, stormwater management, water and electricity. The applicant must indicate which phases apply to the Site Plan application being submitted. Complete Incomplete See Notes ~ o Landscape Plan Complete Incomplete ~- ~',;;;'S\l ' ,J:i.-~;;""" , i1~:.:--' IV,' I .:~ ~i:-"m..~ ,l6J~1!il ~- Notes:, ' [jI" _.A;;~ ,. See Notes 1110D1_321 ~~ Phased Development Plan Location and dimension's of landscaping and open space areas to include calculation of landscape coverage , , Vegetative screening in accordance with SDC Section 31.160 Written description, including specifications of the permanent irrigation system Location and type of street trees List in chart form the proposed types of landscape materials (trees, shrubs, ground cover). Include in the chart genus, species, common name, quantity, size, spacing and method of planting '" Additional comments not .related, to the completeness of the application: 1/25/07 I}il ~ IFJI,"t~, JE;=.J~~7 ~ ~ 1iiiii1~ @tJ~ ~ IjiW ~ 1iiiii1,~ ~~ f&,ii'l'_ t!fJJ,. . 3 I ?KBZt7D7- 0 OOOZ ~l?e6p# u,ept,..()(f'y /j2.{,1 7 ;t:,. M&K€N/oIE)" SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST . ~ " TRANSPORTATION ~9ht-of-WaY Approach Permit application must be provided where the property has frontage on an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) facility. Complete Incomplete See Notes ~ Copy of ROW approach Permit Application ~ [jI I ,A yTraffic Impact Study-four copies of a study prepared by a Traffic Engineer in fJ,,/" accordance with SDC Section 32.020(1)(c). Traffic Impact Studies (TIA) allow the City to analyze and eyaluate the traffic impacts and mitigation of a development on the . City's transportation system. In general, a TIA must explain how the traffic from a given development affects the transportation system in terms of safety, traffic. operations, access and mobility, and immediate and adjoining street systems. A TIA must also address, if'needed, City, metro plan and state land use and transportation policies and objectives. Complete Incomplete See Notes ~ Traffic Impact Study ~ ~ o Site Plan Complete Incomplete See Notes ~ ~ ,~ Access to streets, alleys and properties to be served, including the location and dimensions of existing and proposed curb cuts and curb cuts proposed to be closed o Improvement and Public Utilities Plan Complete Incomplete See Notes ~ ~ ~ Location and type of existing and proposed street ;~ lighting ~ ImI mID Location, widths and names of all existing and proposed streets, alleys, dedications or other right-of- ways within or adjacent to the proposed development ~ ~ 1iI Location of existing and required traffic control devices 0'iJ 7/21/04 4 r, , Office of the Fir' Marshal 225 5" SIr .oel (541) 726-3737, Fa. (541) 741-2214 Alternate Materials and Methods Request Date: Facility Address: Representative Requesting Change: Title: Represented Co,/Person: ' I Phone: The alternate must meet the spirit(intent) of the code an1 be equivalent to the ;rescription of the code in quality, strength, effectiveness, fire resistance, durability; and safety, ' Attach plans, drawings, s;ecificaiion'sheets, iechnical rdports, etc, to clarify and s~pporiyour proposal, I l/we request the following alternate to the fire code requirements, I Pertinent code section(s): Proposed Alternate: Reason foraltemalt'; method and materials: Supporting documents attached: Yes No Signature: Date: SFMO Office Use Below This Line Applicable Codes/Procedures: Approved Disapproved, Signature · (DFM) (FM) Title Date , Note: This decision is specific 10 this alternate request only and is based solely on Ihe facts included herein, · Asupervisor signature is required, Conditions of Approval: Justification: SOP 6,02,01 12/16105 G/'(~6~L fJ!<E:rC07-COCO;Z 0. f ,:7 ~ G ff ,{.. iln1 LfVC>_~11 ~fL4J r)"'e-I~ , F/s'l (;, '9f~ SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICAf:ffiN-.Jt;-w-;Zc" :?cvr- II~ PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST FIRE o Site Plan ,Complete Incomplete ~ ~ See Notes [jI, lEA .- On-site vehicular circulation o Improvement and Public Utilities Plan Complete Incomplete See Notes ~ Location of existing and required fire hydrants and similar public facilities J&l ~ Notes: Heads Up ORC Comments: A Landscaping: A 3 foot clear, space shall be maintained around the circumference of fire hydrants (2004 SFC 508,5.5), - . _ B. Landscaping: Immediate access to fire department connections shall be maintained at all times and without obstruction by fences, bushes, trees, walls or any other'objecUor a minimum of 3 feet (2004 SFC 912,3), . , C, Provide an Aiternative Methods and Materials sub~ittai for the deletion of sprinkler protection in the "High Energy Clinac" room, SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING o Site Assessment of Existing Conditions Complete Incomplete See Notes ~' -~. :-' t'l " "::: l;'~. 1i:SJ~~'1 1"',,1 \"',"'7\ ~~ ~~, ,';,'+,;'i;~j _ ?:,~y."'.<. 1""1'" ~'f'I LC:iJdi",:~~', IXI"''',~ , ~\".~~ IVI~J ~" "" I?SJ' ~-'- ' ',,':?L':..: ~'?"";:*~ 1/25/07 Vicinity Map The name, location and dimensions of all existing site features including buildings, curb cuts, trees and impervious surface areas, clearly indicating what is remaining and what is being removed Required setbacks to the proposed new property lines for, existing structures to remain on site The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and top of bank of all watercourses and required riparian setback that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map on file in the Development Services Department The 100-year floodplain and f100dway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment or Letter of Map Revision The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in Article 17 of the Springfield Development Code and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file in the Development Services Department Physical features including, but not limited to trees 5" in diameter or greater when measured 4 V2 feet above the ground, significant clusters of trees and shrubs, riparian areas, wetlands and rock outcroppings [jI~":~"~ Soil types and water table information as mapped and specified in the Soils Survey of Lane County. A 'Geotechnical Report prepared by an Engineer must be submitted concurrently if the Soils Survey indicates the proposed development area has unstable soils and/or a high water table I0i1 ll:!::J fii'l L::!I fiiiiI ~ ~\'~~J" D~-,~-. ~ ~'"'-''' i9'" ;; ,0Ji~,~"" =:s~' '0in;:; ~ ~'~"" :;;:,"",;',q;\;;n.:! .!:bi''fu,A c ~ ~ 11>!'1:"~"~ O~:'i-' Iiiiiil,' li:::2J r;;:JiI;;::~ 1!!J~i,''';" ~ ~-0"rc'il ,"'~, ',.R,., ",.,; ~'T ~" .~. fiiia ~ Prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect or Engineer 6 Notes: Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application: \/25/07 5 o Improvement and Public Utilities Plan must be in compliance with the regulations of SDC Articles 31 and 32 and must include the following information: Complete, Incomplete See Notes Ivr"",~ ~<""'h;" ~"l1llid!1'" , . d'; ~i;;'{%6TI , '"lm.. R71,~,"',','" ~~ l2Q"-=' j , "~','Si5S$'* , >,':$.-"""= ~ r;;;;;] ~ ~~' ,*" A4, lr;f]"~,, f' <:: 7E..""-- .".; t_"----~~ ',,"'..;'" ~ ~ I!'ln'" J &t'~~~- ~ I""I-:~:I ~~;'S=,{. o Grading and Paving Plan Complete Incomplete See Notes ~~.._' , ":;;-,'21r' . ,r:=c.__ ~~.,'tJ . . '.>'f_"-;-< .. ..:-::t- ~,,,,.'E ,- ,~''''" 'n!~-i$ -, ,".--...$8;b: l~lti~ ~k"""d!l' .-, '-' i I'<M~-+'" "~ 1/25/07 I\iiill' L!:1I ~-" ,"F',,", .:q 1',,"'...',:::1 t:r:j~" ~ ~ Ii; I:;!:;>~';~ L::2.I'4+b;~ . f'iiiil ~ Iiiiii1 ~ [jI 1f!1-- ,:: -~ "'" '4, ;0,,*"'_ -"'"" ~"" ""'z -,.,.," ".- r;7';l".~ L:ilill~ Prepared by an Oregon Licensed Civil Engineer All existing and proposed easements Location of existing and required power poles, transformers, neighborhood mailbox units and similar public facilities Location and width of all existing and proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways ,and trails ' Location and size of existing and proposed utilities on and adjacent to the site including sanitarY sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV. Indicate the proposed connection points Prepared by an Oregon Licensed Civil Engineer Planting plan prepared by an Oregon Licensed Landscape Architect where plants are proposed as part of the stormwater management system Roof drainage patterns and discharge locations Pervious and impervious area drainage patterns The size and location of stormwater management systems components, including but not limited to: drain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention ponds; storm water quality measures; and natural drainageways to be retained Existing and proposed spot elevations and contours lines drawn at 1 foot intervals (for land with a slope over 10 percent, the contour lines may be at 5 foot intervals) Amount of proposed cut and fill 7 o ' Stormwater Management System Study-four copies of a study with the completed Stormwater Scoping Sheet attached. The plan, supporting calculations and documentation must be consistent with the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual. Complete Incomplete See Notes ~,,,-,',,,",. ",,'+.' I' ,'.', ""d " , Scoping Sheet and attached Stormwater Management System Study Iiiiii1 ~ Notes: Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application: The unknown utility vault to remain on Sheet Ll.O appears to be underneath new building footprint. 1/25/07 8 . o Site Plan, SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Complete Incomplete' o Site Assessment of Existing Conditions , Complete, Incomplete See' Notes [jj~- , " [jI '~III' [jj ~~,' " I}il ~~ .~. BUILDING (IV~ ~~-; pW/t--VffV6 vt"PT) ,~iI<-'l Soil, types and water table information as mapped and specified in the Soils Survey of ,Lane County. A Geotechnical Report prepared by an Engineer must be submitted concurrently if the Soils Survey indicates the proposed 'development area has unstable soils and/or a , high water table ' Proposed buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area), setbacks from property " lines, distance between buildings, and height Location, dimensions and number of typical; , compact and disabled parking spaces; including aisles,landscaped areas, wheel bumpers, ' directional signs and striping , On-site loading areas and vehicular and pedestrian circulation ' . .< ; 0," Grading, Paving '.and St~rl11water Manag:ment Plan' , Complete, Incomplete See Notes ~ ' 1:".:"" " ",B " 1/26/07 '~", I..!!I ..- ~,'" I.ffiill [jj ,,' ,,' , .., . ~ ,. '". .:' . ... Roof drainage patt~rns anddisch~rge locations \' . .. , ' , , ' Existing and proposed spot elevations and contours lines drawn at, lfoot intervals (for land with a slope over 10 percent, the contour lines may be at 5 foot intervals) , '".' , , Amount of proposed cut and fill ' ',. . ., ;".- . , , , /'. 9 "f' . , o Architectural Plans: Complete , :;"'~'~i J&J~"'4' I 1/>:I~"'7iffl 6ii~:^!,,:. / IJ/';I~~i4)il }:11' '," Notes: Incomplete r;;;;l,' 8:::J ~ Iiiiii1 1B2J' See Notes ~"'~~'l ." ,~~,.. w..l.j"',i H""I<";J!1~'i ~r;Af:;l Exterior elevations of all buildings and structures proposed for the development site Conceptual floor plans Type, height and area of exterior lighting Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application: 1/26/07 10 " ANY REQUIRED ADDITIONAL MATERIALS, APPLICATIONS OR , " PERMITS' , IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL STANDARDS/APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE APPLICANT SHOULD CONSIDER UTILIZING EITHER THE DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING OR THE PRE- APPLICATION ,REPORT FOR MORE DETAILED INFORMATION: Applicable Not. Applicable fi!iI 'I.Z!EJ ~ Proposed deed 'restrictions and a draft of any Homeowner's Association Agreement Additional plans and documentation for submittal of a Cluster 'Subdivision proposal as specified in SDC Section 16.100(3) " Riparian Area Protection Report For properties located within 150 , feet ofthe top of bank of any Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WQLW) or within 100 feet of the top of bank of 'any dir:ect tributaries of WQLW [jI ~ ~ [jI ~ ~ k:2SJ .. .-' ". " '" A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must.be submitted concurrently if there are unstable soils and/or a high water table present, ' Where-the deyelopment,area is within an overlay district , 'applicable, address the additional standards of the overlay district - , If ftveor more trees are proposed to be remolied; aTree Felling , , Permit as specified in' SDC Article 38 " 'A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon Division of State' , Lands, must' be submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on.the property , _' ' , , ,~ ~ '~,- ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ Iiiiiil,'''' Il!!!iJ rQ1 , ' l2a:Y ',.-', : . > . . , Any required federal or state permit must be submitted , concurrently or evidence the permit application has been submitted for review' ' . , ',' '-".' , Where imy grading; filling, 'or excavating is proposed with the development, a Land and Drainage Alteration permit must be submitted with the land use application ' Where applicable, any Discretionary Use, Variance or Modification of Provisionsas specified in SDC Article 10. or 11 ' ~ ~ . -[jI "'";' .,: [jI , ,~" ", ," . . .... .ie-.'" J , ',. . .. '.~ 1/25/07 , 12, .... . '>'. ~ " THIS APPLICATION IS: ]gCOMPLETE FOR PROCESSING ' D INCOMPLETE AND NEEDS MISSING INFORMATION NOTED ABOVE 9~~- City Planner /-"26-07 Date' This is not a decision on your application. Springfield Development Code Sections 3.050(3)-(6) and Oregon Revised Statutes 227.178 require the City take final action on a limited land use decision withih 120 days after the application is deemed complete. The 120- day processing period for this application begins when all the missing information is ' submitted or when you request that the City proceed without the information. You must , indicate by either signing this form or by submitting a written response to the City within , seven days of the date of this form asserting your intentions regarding the provision of the: missing information. ,If you indicate herein or in your written response the missing, , 'information will be submitted, then you have 180 days from the date the application was ,submitted for Pre~Submittal Review to provide the City with the missing information,' If you refuse to submit the missing information, then upon receipt of the full application packet and processing fee, the City will deem the application complete for purposes of starting the 120- 'day clock and begin processing the application. No new information may be submitted after " the start of the 120-day period unless accompanied by a request for an extension of the , 120-day processing time: Upon receipt of a request for extension, the City may extend the 120-day period for a reasonable period of time. The City may also require additional fees if the new information is submitted after the Notification to Surrounding Property Owners is sent 'out and a second notification is required orifthe new information substantially affects' the application proposal and additional review is required., " I, the owner/applicant, intend to submit alrmissing items indicated herein to the City within the 180-day tirr.eline. ' _ ' " '" ' ~' 0 D'~~ Owner/ Applicant:s Signature, ... ,- ~./ - , , ,..- . .": " ",.' 'I . .~. ..- - , ' ,..., " '" . ' ><.. . , , " , , " ' " " , . - l', .-,."', . , 1/25/07 . - , - 13 ".> "'l " . ~,'