The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutNotes, Work PLANNER 12/23/2005 v , I '1 .~' . TYPE II TENTATIVt: LAND DIVISION, PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST' Project Name: ' La'Url2n E?tates Project Proposal: 12-lot subdivision Case Number: PRE2005"00084 Project Address: South 56th Sfreet .Ii: Assessors Map and Tax Lot Number(s): 18-02-04-11 TL4800, 4900, 5000, 5200 Zoning: LDR Applicable Refinement Plan: Refinement, Plan Designation: Pre-Submittal Meeting Date: December 23, 2005 Application Submittal Deadline: June 23, .2006 Associated Applications: Property, Line Adjustments?? CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TEAM' I POSITION I pro;ect Manaqer I Transportation Planninq Enqineer I Public Works Civil Enqineer . I Public Works EIT . I Deputy Fire Marshall I Community Services .Manaqer REVIEW OF Planning Transportation Utilities Sanitary & Storm Sewer Fire and Life Safety Buildinq APPLICANT'S DEVELOPMENT REVIEW'TEAM Owner . '. , Don Horton, 780 South' 57th Street, ,Springfield, OR 97478 12/22/05 . NAME Sarah Summers Gary McKenney Matt Stouder Matt Stouder Gilbert Gordon Dave Puent PHONE \ 726-4611 726-4585 . I 736-1035 I' 736-1035 726-2293 726-3668 , Engineer Poage Engineering, 990,Obie Street, Eugene, OR 97402 . Marve Krush, 54 Centennial Loop, Eugene 97478 ! I. TENTATIVt lANDDIVISION.!PlICATION '.' PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST PLANNING o Application Fee discuss the applicable fees o One additional copy of the Land Division Plan reduced to 8'h"x 11:' Complete Incomplete See, Notes ~ ~ ~ 8 'I2"x 11" Copy of Land Division Plan o Copy of the deed and a preliminary title report issued within the past'(=;O days documenting ownership and listing all encumbrances. If the applicant is not the property owner, written permission from the property owner is required. ' ' Complete,' Incomplete See Notes fiiiiJ l.2f!I ~ ~ o Tentative ,Land Division Plan Complete, Incomplete See , Notes [8] ~ ~ " ~ [8] ~. ~' r<;l L.2EJ ~ ~' ~ /;;:::J ~ ~ ,/;;:::J,' ' Ei::J ,~ ~'~' ~ r<;l ~ [8], , ' ,~ ~, ,12/22/05 Deed and Preliminary Title Report Prepared by a'n Oregon Licensed Land Surveyor in accordance with, ORS 92 All existing and proposed easements Dimensions ,and size of each parcel and the approximate dimensions of each building site indicating the top and toe of cut and fill slopes to scale , " Location, widths and names of all existing and proposed streets, alleys, dedications or other right-of- w?-ys withih .or adjacenUo the' proposed land division Location.of existing and required traffic control devices, fire hydrants, power poles, transformers, , neighborho()d'mailbox units and similar public facilities Location and width of all existing and propos'ed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways and bike trails' , . ~'. Location, size and type of plantings and street trees in any required planterstrip , 2 ' ~ .~ ~ " ~ Location and size of eXisting and proposed utilities on and adjacent to thesite,including sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV. Indicate the proposed connection points o Phased Development Plan required if redivision is proposed. The plan must include the boundaries'and sequencing of each proposed redivision. Any redivision must progress in a sequence promoting street connectivity between the various phases of the development and accommodating other required public improvements. ' Complete Incomplete' See Notes ~ ~ Phased Development Plan ~ Notes: , All utilities are 'not shown. Need a vicinity map. It,is difficult to ,find the original lots on these drawings. Please submit a plan that shows the tax lot boundaries and numbers, , The tax map does not correspond to the plat Additional comments: , Submit ,on at least 18" x 24" sheets. Show City and/or UGB boundaries, location and outline to scaie of all existing structures and driveways to remain on property and the setbacks from property lines, soil types, % of slopes where 15% or more, .. " , " J, " 12/22/05 .: , 3 p,~z,~f"~ - 000 e>4 IIote'fl'JN q. /4'7f'E#IVG)" 1z,../z3/~ TENTATIVE LAND DIVISION APPLICATION PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST " TRANSPORTATION o Right-of-Way Approach Permit application must be provided where the property has frontage on an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) facility. Complete Incomplete See Notes II',.' " ~, ;, Copy of ROW approach Permit Application II !Ii o Traffic Impact Study-four copies of a study prepared by a Traffic Engineer in accordance with SDC Section 32.020(1)(c). Traffic Impact Studies (TIA) allow the City to analyze and evaluate the traffic impacts and mitigation of a development on the City's transportation system. In general, a TIA must explain how the traffic from a given development affects the transportation system in terms of safety, traffic operations, access and mobility, and immediate and adjoining street systems. A TIA must also address, if needed, City, metro plan and state land use ,and transportation policies and objectives. Complete Incomplete See Notes ~ Ii2fii1 Traffic impact Study Iiii:liiI 11m,','~ lISt- ~ o Tentative Land Division Plan' ' Complete Incomplete See Notes 111 Q) Location and type of existing and proposed street lighting M mEl I fa t;,;;1 ~ Iiml, IEf Location, widths and names of all existing and proposed streets, alleys, dedications or other right-of- , ways within or adjacent to the proposed land division' II 11"..,", :>'!' ;::,~;\J e ~ Location of existing and required traffic control devices Notes: (!1:h1!.a:rr t.tqPrtN ~ W/(...(, 17~ /l.l?'fJf1t(U!O. 7/21/04 4 , , ' T~NTATl\fllANDDi:VISIONfpPLI~~TION PRE-SUBMITTAL, CHECKLIST' .. " / PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING, "-J, :' ~ i~ ~, , " o Site Asse~s~ent of Existing Conditions ,"" Complete, Incomplete :See Notes, Ijj1 lliZ!tl .. .~ jjj, Ijj1 '~ Ijj1 ~ ~, ~ f'i/,l illt ~> @ fiiiiJ ,~ fE'l .~ ~ 'fiiiiJ -~ jjj ~, ~ jjj ~ fiiiiJ t3 " ~ " jjj'" , "":!, .--"'" . ,,=, fiiiiJ .~ is'1 ~ ~ I%'J . kS8J 12/23/05 c . '.' , , ' h ., Prepared by an Oregon lice[lsed'Landscap~ Architect" or Engineer ' , 'Vicinity Map . ' ..' The n'~m~, location and dim'ensions~f ~II existing site features including buildings, 'curl;> cuts; trees,:and :' , impervious surface areas, dearly indicatingwhatis', remaining and what is being removed ' .. . Co", ",' Require,d s~tbacks to' the proposedriev... property" lines for eXisti,ng structure? tp'rerria!n On site.. ' - -.' -( , . The name, location, dimensions, direction of f10~ and top of bank of all watercourses and ,required riparian ' setback that are shown on tl:1e Water Quality Limited ' Watercourse Map on file'in the Development Services Department, (. . . . - . The 100-year floodplain and f10pdway bo'undaries, on the site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEM,lI. approved Letter of Map Amendment or Letter of Map Revisipn, ,,' " '., .. , . :. . _;. 'C. I . , The Time of Travel Zones; as specified in Article 17 of the Springfield Development Code and delin'eated on theWe'lIheadProtection Areas Map on file in the pevelopmen~':servic~s Qepa,rtment' ',:,' " PhysiCal features including, but not limited t~ trees 5" , in diameter or greater when measured 4 V, feet above the ground" significant clusters of trees and , shrubs, riparian areas, wetlands"and rock ,: outcroppings' , , ." Soil types and water table information as mapped and specified inthe Soils Survey of Lane County. A G.eotechnical Report prepared by an Engineer must' be submitted concurrently if the Soils Survey" indicates the proposed devt!lopment area ha!;! unstable soils and/or a high water table 5 o ,: Tentative Land' Oivb..m' Plim ,,' , Complet~ rwl' ~ ~ ~ '~ ~' ~' Ii0 ~ RYl,' ~ rw1 ~ ... . ~ " " , , , Incomplete See' , , Notes, [~l ',Ii]," .fiiiiJ l!!!J ,Ia ' ~. 1iJ' rw1 ~ la' ~. - ~. ~ .,'q ~ iUi' ,.~. [j] IiJ , Ia,H,' , ,@JEJ ,>' , .. fiiiiJ . "'\.Ililiill '."," IiJ .,,', iUi ' ,. L:!illill' iii '.. o Grading and Paving ,Plan . .' . :' '.' Complete '@i'J ~ @i'J' ~ ,12/23/05 ' P,repared by an o'regon Licensed Land Surveyor in , accordance with ORS 92 , ' >"", , ' . ,. . ;..., , , , , ' , " All existing and proposed ea,senlents" ,Dimensions and size of each parcel and the approximate dimensions of each building site' indicating th,e top and toe of cut and fill slopes to scale '. '.. .;. - I.' , Location arid type :of existing and proposed street lightingq , - . . .'. . , ' Location, widths and names of all existing and proposed streets, alleys, dedications or other right-of- , w,ays wi,th!n?r adja,c,ent ~()the proposed land division Location of existing and required traffic control' " " . , ' , devices; fire, hydrants, power poleos, transformers, " , neighborhood mailbox unitsand sirnilarpublic facilities " , " Location arid width of all existing and' proposed ,": sidewalks; sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways and bike.trails " " . .. ,..,' Location;size:and type of plantings and street trees in any, required plante'r.strip" ' Lo~ation ,and size of existing andp~~pos~d utilities on .. ' hand adjacent to the site' including,sanitary sewer' mains, stormwater management !?ystems, water mains, power, gas; telephone, and cable TV., Indicate, the propos~dconnection points ,"" ,.-;t. "." .>".. " .-:".;" ",.'./ :' - .J. ";.'. Incomplete' See Notes iii. ~, ~, , " " /!iiiiI ,',~ ~ , .' IiJ .,' .... " ~ -' . " ,"'.<. Prepared by~anciregon' Licensed Civil Engineer" , .' '. ".:'.:' ~ ...- . -.... ;.~ '." Planting plan'prepared by an Oregon Li'censed ;, , Landscar>:e ,Architect 'where plants are proposed a's.., part ofthe'storrrwoiater management system, , ~,," y , Roofdrain~ge patterns and discharge location~ " ,. ,'i'.',. , . Pervious and impervious an;a drainagep.atterns ", . . .' . -" ",'. " ,. ,',. " 6" , " "'h .,~' " , ~ '~ '~ The size and location vI' stormwatermanagement" ~ ' , systems components, including but not limited to: drain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention ponds; stormwater qu?-lity meas,ures; and natural drainageways to be retained ~' ~ ,~ Existing and proposed spot elevations and contours H0'f . . . . ,lines ,drawn at 1 foot intervals (for land with a slope, , , over 10 percent; the contour lines may be at 5 foot . .-... . '. , intervals) '~ " ~ ~ '0' . :,,'+ Amount of proposed cut and fill ' o Stormwater M'anagemerit System S~udy provide four (4) copies of the'study with the completed Stormwater Sc:oping Sheet attached. (See attactled for.5tormwater Scoping,Sheet), The plan, caiculations and documentation must,beconsistent with the Engin~ering Design Standards and Proced.ur~s Manual. ' ' , , ' ,Complete, Incomplete' See' ':Notes fiiiiJ ,rli!J ". . ~i' . ' , '.' " ~ , " Scopirig Sheet and attacheclSi:orm~ater 'Management System Study,:, '.' ,';.-- > ,. " No~es:, ' " , ",", '"" L A yicinity, map need!? to be provided:on the plans, " "/" 2: The ~ite as'sessme~tof e~isting c~riditio~sdoes not'j-etiect the actuaiexisfi~g/ 'conditions, Please show the existing tax lots as they exist, ,and eliminate the' ' proposed lots from ,the ,site assessment of existing conditions. Please only show', ' the "exis'ting co'n~litions" on t~e site assessment sheet, .' " ' . . .. ,'. -. ,- ,--' .... -. " .' '.:. " 3. There' was' no water quality component id~ntifiedwith the proposed subdivision, ' " As required per code ,and: referenced in previous development issues meetings;' pre-treatment of stormwaterwill be required (sedimentation manhole liKe '.., ' Baysaver, etc.), Installation at a downstream location (Le>.57th and 'Glacier St. " intersection) maybe a possibility." : ' .' ' " , A, No turnarou~d (hammer head or Cul-de-Sac) was proposed atth~ end of SOiJth 56th Street,' Refer to Fire and Transportation conimentsfor more 'detail. ", ',. , _': ' _ . -._ :". . n '.. .", . '. . : .. .'" I!':( c. . ' . . .. " 5. The proposed utilities (storm, 'sanitary, water, etc.)'shoLJld be located, 01) a pl?-n .. st;3mped by ~heCivil Engineer.' ,,.",.," .', ," '. ',' ,', ",',,: ,",' , : " '" . ," " . ,~ .. . , Additional comments not related to the completeness 'of t~e application:' , ." . ,.." ' - " -,",- , .,'" :-'. - . ~ . " 7 ] 2/23/05 , ' , ' " 6; ?ome cut and , ,,( willbe required, due to 'consi:ructl~rl:of the fl,!ture roadway, " ,'7, More inf~rmatiori is needed for the proposed roa'd~ay (r~gardingcontours). ~ . - . 'Please identify additional proposed contours along the new roadway" ' , ~ 8, 'The s~ir types on sitea~e indicated in the storm drainage study, Please identify , ,these soil types.on the site assessment sheet as identified in the Springfield Development Code.,' , ..'.,' , ,',., ~/ :, ' . ",' , ", ' " 9. Please provide ri~ and flow line elevation 'data for the proposed storm and sanitary sewe~systems ' ", " :', '. ", ;'-~: , ,,' ," .' " ., " ,', - ;, , " " " :'.. " " , ",'" ..', .' >'-', ~ ,::...:; (;. . '; -,;'~ ~ - ". , " ,; , " ,\" ", ";'" .h., ;." 1",'"";' " .1,' ...." ., . .X .. ~.', .... .f. "I' " . ,i '. '" .,.... .;., .' ". . '" ,.' ~ " , " ',' .' '. t' ., " ..' "j' ,',. , " 12/23/05 '. 8 ' '< " , ' ::pe6-ZOC5-0C08 'f , , l::k- , , ' ' '60 S .S,7 --- 81- TENTATIVE lAND DIVISION APPLICATION . PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST FIRE o Tentative Land Division Plan Complete Incomplete See Notes fiiiiJ ~. Location, widths and names of all existing and proposed streets, alleys, dedications. or other right-of- ways within or adjacent to, the proposed land division " ~ ~. ~ , ", '''!;.;;;iI l8Sl " ~ Location,ofexisting and required fire hydrants Notes: Additional Comments not related to the completeness of the application: S~~W~'tC'L+t ~ ~. ',~ '-fv \2---~' q. ;'.x.' --- \~ .~~ . DD ,UVV lb loa....d ~n' w~?vzAl, ~~ '. ' 4/6104 I I I , '9 ANY REQUIRED" A'oDITIONALMATERIALS, APPLICATIONS OR , PERMITS . IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL _ , STANDARDS/APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, THE APPLICANT SHOULD CONSIDER UTILIZING EITHER THE DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING OR THE PRE- APPLICATION REPOI3.T FORMORE DETAILED INFORMATION: ' Applicable Not Applicable ~ ~ ~ Proposed deed restrictions and a draft of any Homeowner's Association Agreement Additional plans and documentation for submittal of a Cluster Subdivision proposal as specified in SDC Section 16.100(3) Riparian Area Protection Report For properties located within 150 feet of the top of bank of, any Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WQLW) or within 100 feet of the top of bank of ',any direct tributaries of WQLW A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be submitted concurrently if there are unstable soils and/or a high water table present' ". Where the development,area is within an overlay district , applicable, address the additional standards of the overlay . district ,/;;:::J . U!ID [8] ~ ~ [8] Iih'l IBJ [8] ~ [8], ~ ~ , ' , If five or more trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling Permit as specified in SDC Article 38 ' ' , A wE!tland delineation approved by the Oregon Division of State La'nds must be submitted concurrently where there is a wetland, on the pmperty Any required federalor,state permit must be submitted concurrently or evidence the permit application h,!s been submitted for review ' , , [8] I!iil l3.:!lI ~ [8] ~ ts:lJ [8] Where any grading, filling or excavating is proposed with the development, a Land and Drainage Alteration permit must be submitted with the land use application , Where applicable, 'any Discretionary Use, Variance or Modification of Provisions as specified in SDC Article 10 or 11 ~, ~ ,- .,' , 12/22/05 " 10 " -".' - " ',,-- THIS APPLICATION IS: o COMPLETE FOR PROCESSING , [8] INCOMPLETE AND NEEDS MISSING INFORMATION NOTED ABOVE ~dALI~ / //c7:l /6.s-- / D,ate City Planner -.1" This is not a ,decision on your application. Springfield Development Code Sections 3.050(3)-(6) and Oregon Revised Statutes 227.178 require'the City take final, action on a limited land use decision within 120 days after the application is deemed complete, The 120- day processing period for this application begins when all the missing information is submitted or when:vou request that the City proceed without the information. You must indicate by either signing this form or by submitting a written response to the'City within seven days of the date of this form asserting your intentions regarding the provision of the missing information, If you indicate herein or in your written' response that'the missing information will be submitted, then you have 180 days from the date the application was submitted for Pre-Submittal, Review to provide the City with the missing information. If you refuse to submit the missing information, then upon 'receipt of the full applicatioripacket and processing fee,'the City will deem the application complete for purposes of starting the 120- day clock and begin processing the application. No new information may be submitted after , the start of the 120-day period unless accompanied bya request for an ,extension of the 120-day processing time. Upon receipt of a request for extension, the City may extend the 120-day period for a reasonable period of time. The City may also require additional fees if the new (nformation is submitted after the Notification to Surrounding Property Owners is sent out and a second notification is required or if the new information subsfantially affects the application proposal and additional review 'is required, I, the owner/applicant, intend to submit all missing items indicated herein to the City within the 180-daytimeline. ' , . .~....... " )'VI. --'\\. Owner/Applicant's Signature I' I..........:. ---- 12/22/05 II' , _\