Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNotes, Work PLANNER 12/9/2008 ~ / :City of Springfield Development Services Department 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 SITE PLAN REVIEW PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Project Name: Armed Forces Reserve Center/BLM Warehouse Expansion Project Proposal: Expand the existing BLM warehouse and offices by constructing a 12,300 ft2 two-story office and storage building. Case Number: PRE2008-00071 Project Address: 2022 31st Street . Assessors Map and Tax Lot Number(s): 17-02-30-00, TL 1000 Zoning: Light Medium Industrial (LMI) Overlay District(s): Drinking Water Protection (DWP) Applicable Refinement Plan: N/A Refinement Plan Designation: . Metro Plan Designation: Heavy Industrial (HI) Pre-Submittal Meeting Date:. lttAe ~], ~.QQS l:l<.c "', 2..oo~ __ . - ------ "- Application Submittal Deadline: I)<.c~ml-cr 10, 200S~ ~:r.::;2'/~oo~_:J Associated Applications: ZON2003-00044; PRE2004-00004; DRC 2004-00005; DRC2005- 00092; PRE2007-00010; DRC2007-00026 IClm,v.lQfJseItXN"GJi:I.E1!"P}PESleI!fOeMENiTdJtE.SlifEWIJt1iF~M..~_Jl:i11~JlIiIIIIIIlIi.'q I POSITION REVIEW Of NAME PHONE I I Proiect Planner Land Use Planninq Andy Limbird 726~3784 I I Transportation Planninq' Enqineer Transportation Jon Driscoll 726-3679 I I Public Works Enqineer in Traininq Utilities Clayton McEachern 736-1036 I I Public Works Enqineer in Traininq Sanitary & Storm Sewer Clayton McEachern I 736-1036 I I Deputy Fire .Marshal Fire and Life Safety Gilbert Gordon 1726-2293 I I Community Services Manaqer Buildinq Dave Puent 726-3668 I r~p.pUIC~Nn::"5JPESlatoeMENrr.JtESl:IEW.l!!l1E~M~.~JII!lII1lJL\~"~JI~ J]_LilL~_..J1 Applicant Owner Jim Thomas Oregon Military Dept. Wild ish Building Co. 1776 Militia Way P.O. Box 7428 P.O. Box 14350 Euqene, OR 97401 Salem OR 97309-5047 Revised 10/25/07 . Data Received:~/ .v'otf Planner: AL TENTATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST PLANNING o Application fee - discuss the applicable fees o Copy of the Site Plan reduced to 8'h"x 11" Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) Ii0'I ~ rii;l ~ 8 y," x.ll" Copy of Site Plan' o Copy of the deed and a preliminary title report issued within the past 30 days documenting ownership and listing all encumbrances. If the applicant is not the property owner, written permission from the property owner is required. Complete Incomplete See.Planning . Note(s) III ~ 1 Deed and Preliminary Title Report o Brief narrative explaining the purpose of the development, the existing use of the property, and any additional information that may have a bearing in determining the action to be taken. The narrative should also include the proposed number of employees and future expansion plans, if known. Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) ~ o Site Plan Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) 2, 3 Iiiiil ~ ~ IE ~ ~ 4,5 ~ ~ 6 ~ ~ [liThE y~~, ,",,"H Revised 10/25/07 Brief Narrative Prepared by an Oregon Licensed Architect, Landscape Architect, or Engineer Proposed buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area applicable to the parking requirement for the proposed use(s)), setbacks from property lines, and distance between buildings Location and height of existing or proposed fences, walls, outdoor equipment, storage, trash receptacles, and signs Location, dimensions, and number of typical, compact, and disabled parking spaces; including aisles, wheel bumpers, directional signs, and striping Dimensions of the development area, as well . as area and percentage of the site proposed for buildings, structures. ' parki~~~np Date Received: ~ 1/)t1pr . Planner; AL 1}:71 ~ 1}:71 ~ [II See Note vehicular areas, sidewalks, patios, and other impervious surfaces Observance of solar access requirements as specified in the applicable zoning district On-site lo.ading areas and vehicular and pedestrian circulation Location, type, and number of bicycle parking spaces Area and dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for common open spaces, recreational areas, and other similar public and semi-public uses Location of existing and proposed transit facilities '1i0'I IaiJ .1}:71 .~ ~ ~ IiWl Il!.0!J o Phased Development Plan Where applicable, the Site Plan application must include a phasing plan indicating any proposed phases for development, including the boundaries and sequencing of each phase. Phasing must progress in a sequence promoting street connectivity between the variol:Js phases of the development and accommodating other required public improvements, including but not limited to, sanitary sewer, storm water management, water, and electricity. The applicant must indicate which phases apply to the Site Plan application being submitted. Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) ~ [II Phased Development Plan o Landscape Plan Complete Incomplete ~ ~ [II See Planning Note(s) 7 Drawn by a Landscape Architect Location and dimensions of landscaping and open space areas to include calculation of landscape coverage Screening in accordance with SDC 4.4-110 Written description, including specifications, of the permanent irrigation system Location and type of street trees List in chart form the proposed types of landscape materials (trees, shrubs, ground cover). Include in the chart genus, species, common name, quantity, size, spacing and method of planting ~ ~ ~ Ij] [II+hi -.-'.~". ..". Ij] ~ 8 o Architectural Plan Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) 9 Exterior elevations of all buildings and . Data Received:~/~t7f Planner: AL ~ ~ Revised 10/25/07 .flJI l2fSI R'i:l I!!!!l structures proposed for the development site, including height Conceptual floor plans o On-Site Lighting Plan Complete Incomplete See Planning Note( s) ~ [f;I 10 /iJ ~ Location, orientation, and maximum height of exterior light fixtures, both free standing and attached Type and extent of shielding, including cut-off angles and type of illumination, wattage, and luminous area Photometric test report"for each light source [II ~ Planning Notes: . 1. Provide a recent title report with the submittal. The submitted title insurance is 5 years old and does not contain the necessary information shown on a title report. 2. All professional stamps on the submitted plans have expired. The submitted plans must be stamped by the engineer and architect of record, as appropriate. 3. There should be one site plan that conveys all necessary i1iformation instead of multiple sheets with differing' information (ie. Site Plan, Sheet A-l01WA & Site Plan, Sheet L-200). 4. Show the property line setback dimensions for the proposed building addition on the site plan. 5. Show the location and property line setback dimensions for the proposed radio equipment building. 6. Show the location and property line setback dimensions for the proposed antenna on the site plan. 7. The landscape plan should incorporate all proposed changes to the site and must be stamped by the project landscape architect. 8. Provide an updated landscaping plan that shows the building footprint of the proposed expansion area, and incorporates all changes to the bioswale and adjacent landscaping. List the vegetation to be removed and vegetation to be replaced/added on the landscaping plan and provide an updated planting list for the site. 9. Provide an elevation detail for the radio equipment building, including proposed height and building materials. 10.Provide written confirmation thatsite lighting plan will not be affected by proposed changes. . Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application: o Some of the sheets in the submittal are redundant or not necessary. for the site plan review. Staff can explain what plan sheets will be required for the review, and what sheets could be submitted later for the building permit review. o Please bind all required plan sheets into a single submittal for ease of review. o Ensure the bicycle parking requirements for the BLM Warehouse and the proposed addition are satisfied with the covered bicycle racks. o A waiver or update to the Drinking Water Protection Permit for the BLM warehouse will be required (Case DRC2908-00071). . /9A Revised 10/25/07 Date Received:~ '7)<Jtl j' Planner: AL TENTATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Engineer: Clayton McEachern Case#: 02-00071 \ PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING o Site Assessment of Existing Conditions Complete Incomplete See PW Note(s) ~ rr;;;;n t:=J Prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect or Engineer Vicinity Map The name, location, and dimensions of all existing site features including buildings, curb cuts, trees and impervious surface areas, clearly indicating what is remaining and what is being removed. For existing structures to remain, also indicate present use, size, setbacks from property lines, and distance between buildings The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and top of bank of all watercourses and required riparian setback that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map on file in the Development Services Department The 100-year floodplain and floodway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment" or Letter of Map Revision The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3-200 and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file in the Development Services Department Physical features including, but not limited to trees 5" in diameter or greater when measured 4 V, feet above the ground, significant clusters. of trees and shrubs, riparian area~, wetlands, and rock outcroppings Soil types and water table information as mapped and specified in the Soils Survey of Lane County. A Geotechnical fl-eport prepared by an Engineer must be submitted concurrently if the Soils S~rvey indicates the proposed development area has unstable soils and/or a high water table ~ ~ rr;;;;n.", E:2J f0l...... L5J ~ r;;J lEJ ~ ~ ~ Ri:l L!J ~ ~ ~ ~ Revised 10/25/07 Data Received' i;"/tf~,r Planner: AL I I , , o Improvement and Public Utilities Plan must be in compliance with the regulations of SDC Sections 5.17-100, 4.1-100, 4.2-100, and 4.3-100 and must include the following information: Complete Incomplete ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W'l.... W See PW Note(s) .1 2,3 Complete Incomplete o Grading and Paving Plan r;;;l. ~ ~ ~ r;;;:t lE!1 ~ ~ ~ fi'jEl ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ Iilli]] rgJ See PW Note(s) 1 5 Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer Location and width of all existing and proposed easements Location of existing and required power poles, transformers, neighborhood mailbox units, and similar public facilities Location and size of existing and proposed utilities on and adjacent to the site, including sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV. Indicate the proposed connection points Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer Planting plan prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect where plants are proposed as part of the stormwater management system Roof drainage patterns and discharge locations Pervious and .impervious area drainage patterns The size and location of stormwater management systems components, including but not limited to: "drain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention ponds; stormwater quality measures; and natural drainageways to be retained Existing and proposed spot elevations and contours lines drawn at 1 foot intervals (for land with a slope over 10 percent,-the contour lines may be at 5 foot intervals) . Amount of proposed cut and fill o Stormwater Management System Study - provide four (4) copies of the study with the completed Storm water Scoping Sheet attached. The plan, calculations, and documentation must be consistent with the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual. Complete Incomplete f'3B'l ~ [jj . Revised 10/25/07 See PW Note(s) 4 Scoping Sheet and attached Stormwater Management System Study Date Received:~~Of Planner: AL PW Notes: 1. Appears that the civil engineer stamp is expired, missing or marked preliminary 2. Is there a concurrence letter from EWEB .for the change to their easement? 3. The eweb easement is not clearly marked 4. Appears that there is no substantial change to runoff characteristics from previous approved site plan . 5. amount of cut/fill is not listed for the demolition/construction of the BLM building addition 6. Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application: . In the original plans that field to the east adjacent to the Irving Slough is marked as being part of a future phase. With this modification it is marked as being used for vehicle storage in phase 2. Will this area be surfaced before being used for vehicle storage? Revised. 10/25/07 Date Received: /;;/9/,;.oOr Planner: AL TENTATIVE SITE. PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST' Deputy Fire Marshal: Gilbert Gordon' Case #: PRE2008-00071 FIRE o Site Plan . Complete Incomplete See Fire Note( s) ~ II On-site vehicular circulation o Imjnovemen't and Public Utilities Plan Complete Incomplete. See 'Fi~.e . Note(s) . ~ [II Location of existing and required fire hydrants and similar public facilities Fire Notes: 1. . Additional comments not. related to the completeness of the application: Date R6ceived:~/ ~"'f' Planner: AL Revised 9124/07 / ANY REQUIRED ADDITIONAL MATERIALS, APPLICATIONS OR PERMITS IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL STANDARDS OR APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE APPLICANT SHOULD CONSIDER UTILIZING EITHER THE DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING OR THE PRE- - . APPLICATION REPORT FOR MORE DETAILED INFORMAT~ON: Applicable Not Applicable ~ ~ (gJ t:Yl ~ ~ RiI ~ fiii1 ~ Iiiiil.-.. .UE!J. ~ ~-... ,,~~, ."'Ii'. ~ ~-_.- EG'J ';;0' ~ ~ Iruil U!:ill 'ijil Jl:i!I ~ ~ ~ Revised 10/25/07 Where a rJ:Iulti-family development is proposed, any additional materials to demonstrate compliance with SDC 3.2-240 Riparian Area Protection Report for properties located within 150 feet of the top of bank of any Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WQLW) or within 100 feet of the top of bank of any direct tributaries of WQLW A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be submitted concurrently if there are unstable soils and/or a high water table present Where the development area is within an overlay district, address the additional standards of the overlay district If five or more trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling Permit as specified in SDC 5.19-100 , A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon Division of State Lands must be submitted concurrently where there is a'wetland on the property Any required federal or state permit must be' submitted concurrently or evidence the permit application has been submitted for review Where any grading, filling or excavating is proposed with the development, a Land and Drainage Alteration permit must be submitted prior to development ' Where applicable, any Discretionary Use or Variance as specified in SDC 5.9-100 and 5.21-100 An Annexation application, as specified in SDC 5.7.-100, where a development is proposed outside of the city limits but within the City's urban service area and can be serviced by sanitary' sewer Date Received:~/i"""'J" Planner: AL . THIS APPLICATION IS: o COMPLETE FOR PROCESSING ~INCOMPLETE AND NEEDS MISSING INFORMATION NOTED ABOVE IlL :;:;/ ~~C~ This is not a decision.on your application. Springfield Development Code Section 5.4- 105 and Oregon Revised Statutes 227.178 require the City take final action ona limited land use decision within 120 days after tre application is deemed complete. The 120-day processing period for this application begins when all the missing information is submitted or when you request that the City proceed without the information. You must indicate by either signing this form or by submitting a written response to the City within seven days of the date of this form asserting your intentions regarding the provision of the missing information. If you indicate herein or in your written response that the missing information will be submitted, then you have 180 days from the date the application was submitted for Pre- Submittal Review to provide the City with the ,missing information. If you refuse tosubmit the missing information, then upon receipt of the full application packet and processing fee, the City will deem the application complete for purposes of starting the 120-day clock and , begin processing the application. No new information may be submitted after the start of the 120-day period unless accompanied by a request for an extension of the 120-day processing time. Upon receipt of a request for extension, the City may extend the 120-day period for a reasonable period of time. The City may also require additional fees if the new information is submitted after the Notification to Surrounding Property Owners is sent out and a second notification is required or if the new information substantially affects the application proposal and additional review is required. It the owner/applicant, intend to submit all missing items indicated herein to the City within the iSO-day timeline. \0 ~ I L, Owner/Applic~nt's SigrAature J t"'R ~T'Tc.... l:>C3> Date Date f-<eceived: /.2-;f/>>t?/ Planner: Al Revised 10/25/07