HomeMy WebLinkAboutComments COUNTY 9/15/2008
-'I
L1MBIRD Andrew
From: TAYLOR Paula L [PTAYLOR@lcog.org]
Sent: Monday, Septe(nber 15, 2008 12:28 PM
To: L1MBIRD Andrew
Subject: RE: Consent to Annexation Forms
Page 1 of 1
It will be more fun than anything else I have to do today. And I'm into fun these days....
From: LlMBIRD.Andrew [mailto:alimbird@ci.springfield:or.us]
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2008 11:59 AM
To: TAYLOR Paula L
Subject: RE: Consent to Annexation Forms
PT :AP: If you've got the time, that would be great! Thanks
Andy
From: TAYLOR Paula L [mailto:PTAYLOR@lcog.org]
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2008 11:59 AM
To: LlMBIRD Andrew; BANKS Megan H
Cc: JONES Brenda
Subject: RE: Consent.to Annexation Forms
Hi Andy,
The form is still applicable, but should be modified to reflect how it will be used
consistent with past practices and current code. Given f,he circumstances you describe
below, a Consent to Annexation form is still needed.
Want me to take a first crack at revising the existing form?
APpt
From: LlMBIRD Andrew [mailto:alimbird@ci.springfield.or.us]
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2008 11:45 AM
To: BANKS Megan H; TAYLOR Paula L
Subject: Consent to Annexation Forms
APs: I'm-trying to recall whether we decided to modify or discontinue u$e of the "Annexation Agreement" forms
used for land use decisions affecting urban fringe properties (see attached). The City is in receipt of a final
partition plat application for a property in the urban fringe south of Jasper Road. A condition of the partition
approval required the owner to sign a Consent to Annexation form (which was standard practice before the
LCLGBC was abolished), Is this form still applicable? If so, can it be updated simply by inserting new Code
references? Please let me know so I can respond to the applicant. Thanks
Andy
9/15/2008
Dat", ((0ceived' r~.f'
Planner: AL