HomeMy WebLinkAboutComments PLANNER 4/11/2008
Page I of2
L1MBIRD Andrew
From: DONOVAN James
Sent: Friday, April 11 , 2008 8:49 AM
To: TAYLOR Paula L; L1MBIRD Andrew; BAN'~S Megan H
Cc: JONES Brenda
Subject: RE: New Annexation Applications
Lets all meet together,and chart a course, The two apps Andy will have are hold overs from the old process, have
been through DIMs, completeness (such as it is) and fees, One already has a City Annexation Agreement and the
other doesn't need one, We will be doing a mock up of the DRC process using existing info and jumping into staff
reports, I may add the city initiated bridge project for al DRC run but these others need to move forward, We may
back into the DRC process a bit?! '
JD
From: TAYLOR Paula L [mailto:PTAYLOR@lcog.org]
, Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 12:17 PM
To: UMBIRD Andrew; BANKS Megan H
Cc: DONOVAN James; JONES Brenda
Subject: RE: New Annexation Applications
Andy,
Thanks for thinking of us! I can certainly meet with you (and others) to go through the
I '
application and set'some tentative dates, jWe still have process details to iron out and
having some guinea pigs will be helpful (and lots of fun),
, , ' I '
Jim - How would you like to proceed? With one bigger meeting with all of us there to
work through the details? Work through ~he details with the smaller group (JD, BJ, MB,
PT) and then work directly with Andy? How much time do we have to check the
applications for completeness (the sooner the better no doubt)?
pt
From: UMBIRD Andrew [mailto:alimbird@ci.springfikld.or.us]
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 11:02 AM
To: BANKS Megan H; TAYLOR Paula L
Cc: DONOVAN James
Subject: New Annexation Applications
Megan/Paula: I have the first two "City" annexation requests and I'd like to schedule a viable date on the City
Council public hearing docket (tentatively May 19), I ;would like to meet with you to discuss the staff report
requirements and to confirm that we have,all required information in-hand, Please let me know if you are
available to meet sometime next week to review the files - either here or at LCOG offices, Both annexations are
contiguous with the City limits, and one has an execl"ted Annexation Agreement (the other didn't require an
agreement), Thanks
Andy Limbird
DatEll Received:__J/!/1c03
Planner: AL I
4/11/2008
:
Page 1 of2
L1MBIRD Andrew
From: TAYLOR Paula L [PTAYLOR@lcog,org]
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 12:27 PM
To: JONES Brenda; L1MBIRD Andrew; BANK; Megan H
Cc: DONOVAN James
Subject: RE: New Annexation Applications ,
Brenda,
Just to be clear, I can meet anytime I don"t have something else scheduled - like not
being here on Fridays (except, of course, ~hen I am). '
I vote to schedule something with us four land Andy, because we now have applications.
We will end up working ~hrough the detail~ with these new apps, ,
pt
From: JONES Brenda [mailto:bjones@Ci.springfield.okus]
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 12:21 PM I
To: TAYLOR Paula L; UMBIRD Andrew; BANKS Megan H
Cc: DONOVAN James
Subject: RE: New Annexation Applications
Hi. All,
JLvv.. Ls LII\. supervLsor TrClLvi.LII\.g tVte rest of toGlClkj, I wLll be out of tVte office
, tovv..orrow CIS well CIS PClulCl? I tVtoug~t. WVtkj GlOII\.'t we sCVteGlule sovv..etVtLII\.g
lI\.t.xt weeR. oVer Vtere for us four ClII\.Gl ~II\.Glkj. oll\.ce we VtClve tVte process GlOWIl\.,
tVtell\. I tVtLII\.R. we SVtoulGl Glo tVte lClrge~ group. WVtClt Glo kjou tVtLII\.R.?, IF '.
everkjoll\.e Ls 011\. bOClrGl wLtVt tVtClt, I wLVl sCVteGlule tVte Hvv..e. TVtClII\.R.s f;rell\.GlCl
I
I
From: TAYLOR Paula L [mailto:PTAYLOR@lcog.org] I
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 12:17 PM
To: UMBIRD Andrew; BANKS Megan H
Cc: I?ONOVAN James; JONES Brenda
Subject: RE: New Annexation Applications
Andy,
Thanks for thinking of us! I can certainlY,. meet with you (and others) to go through the
application and set some tentative dates. We still have process details to iron out and
, . .,., , '~IVed.~/O ';04'
O-;UI,...) l ,\;J...."" . / ~ 0
Planner: AL
4/10/2008
!
Page 2 of2
having some guinea pigs will be helpful (and lots of fun).
, ,
Jim - How would you like to proceed? With one bigger meeting with all of us there to
I
work through the details? Work through the details with the smaller group (JD, BJ, MB,
PT) and then work directly with Andy? Holw much time do we have to check the
applications for completeness (the sooner I~he better no doubt)?
pt
I
From: UMBIRD Andrew [mailto:alimbird@ci.springfield.or.us]
Sent: Thursday, April, 10, 2008 11:02 AM
To: BANKS Megan H; TAYLOR Paula L
Cc: DONOVAN James
. Subject: New Annexation Applications
Megan/Paula: I have the first two "City" annexation requests and I'd like to schedule a viable date on the City
Council public hearing docket (tentatively May 19), I would like to meet with you to discuss the staff report ,
requirements and to confirm that we have all required information in-hand, Please let me know if you are
available to meet sometime next week to review the i les - either here or at LCOG offices, Both annexations are
contiguous with the City limits, and one has an execu ed Annexation Agreement (the other didn't require an
agreement), Thanks
Andy Limbird
City of Springfield
4/1012008
Data Received: '1ltofp,;/
Planner: AL /