Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMiscellaneous PLANNER 3/21/2007 . I , , ANNEXATION DISTRIBUTION SHEET Affidavit by: Brenda Jones DSD- Planning. Division Name with Boundary Commission Annexation Number and/or Final Order Number: ~ EC SP 08-16(Expedited) Jackson; C SP 08-14 International Church of Foursquare Gospel EC SP 07-64 (Expedited) Evans/Betzl Oakdale Avenue EX S 07-61 (Expedited) Anderson LanefTrolter EC SP 07-60 (Expediled) Anderson LanefTrolter EC SP 07-44 (Expedited) Progress Inveslment Group LLC EC SP 07-35 (Expedited) Nepute C SP 07-34 Horton C SP 07-32 White EC'!3P 07~~2 ~Expedited) Crane Resolution #07-57 Final Order # 1332 Resolution #07-48 Resolution # 07-46 Resolution # 07-46 Resolution # 07-37 Resolution # 07-26 I Final Order # 1315 Final Order # 1314 Resolution # 06-3'9 Linda Pauly, CPR Supervisor, Planning Division Jim Donovan, UP Supervisor, Planning Division (Full Orioinal Packet) Brenda Jones, DSD (Original File Copy) Joe Leahy, City Attorney Bob Duey, Finance Department Jerry Smith, Police Department Dave Puent, Building Division Brian Conlon, Public Works Maintenance Tom Boyatt, Transportation Manager, Public Works Transportation Dennis Ernst, City Surveyor. AI Gerard, Fire and Life Safety Administration Mary Neuharth, Library Ken Vogeney, City Engineer Brandt Melick, GIS / Program Supervisor Deanna Buckem, Engineering Assistant, Environmental Services Division Connie Scolla, LCOG 99 E. Broadway, Suite 400, Eugene, OR 97401 Jim Henry, 911 Center . 1735 W. 2'" Ave., Eugene, OR 97402 ......\ ~ Pauly Limbird Hopkins Hopkins Hopkins Pauly Hopkins Limbird Limbird Donovan Paula Taylor,.Lane County Local Government Boundary Commission !'~99Eas(Broa~wiiY;\.s,l!i1e 400, Eugene, OR 97401 '3111 (acknowledgement Itr only) rilC~IJ ". .".. . , - Ann.ette Newingha'm; Lime County Elections (full packet) , ... . .. . . ~'.' 'II' 135E.6th Aveiil!6, Eugene, OR 97401 , , ' i,' .:.::. ; . ("'t' \ -,"'~'. r;': r;- :" t....r. . J:.. 'lJl, I;) , """..J { , I! ~ . ., .' . ,',- (,' .'^ ' 0[d~ ~ ~::SJ{ ~ y ".f~~t ~ LRP2007 -00095 LRP2006-00030 LRP2007 -00018 . LRP2006-00007 LRP2006-00007 LRP2007 -00003 LRP2007-00017 LRP2006-00025 LRP2007 -00016 LRP2006-00020 ' ,. Date Received MAR 2 1 200,.'1 \ Planner: BJ Mike Bloom,Oregon State Poiice 3620 Gateway Street, Springfield, OR 97477 Ray Maduna, Springfield Utility Board PO Box 300, Springfield, OR 97477 Tim Hanley, Rainbow Water District P.O. Box 8, Springfield, OR 97477 Greg Hyde, Willamalane Parks and Recreation .200 S. Mill Street, Springfield, OR 97477 Marlene Metcalfe, Springfield Utility Board 202 So. 18'h Street, Springfield, OR 9741'1 I I Debbie Williams .. 1 Lane County Tax Assessors, 125 East 8"' Avenue; Eugene, OR I ! I i I Owest 1801 California SI., Suite 2500, Denver, CO 802Q2 , Steve. Barrett, Springfield School District 525 Mill Street, Springfield, OR 97477 NW Natural; Account Services, Attn: Annexation Coordinator 220 NW. 2nd, Portland, OR 97209 ComCast Cable, Attention: Tom Henerty 2897 Chad Drive, Eugene, OR 97408 , . Annette Cardoza, Sanipac P.O. Box 10928, Eugene, OR 97440 .-:-:' ......Ij , ,_ "', \ ,,'.'if" , ,- - \\ .0 ..\' 'r_ ,. '4 \, \ ~ ""''It> rf '<.-,,;,;, , ~,ft ~':-'" ~ C.:.. ~J" :l. ''::..> ..f "'_ ~.), ~ 'Ion\. ,~: ~;\rli jones/annexatlon/drstllsU3-200B . ...../". , M-", ."~ie'"I,{-.' 1; .if ":':: ','::,1~: 47' 11 {I. ""'''\1\ . \1 ~1.!J\.",,~ ,,~,,~J ~f ..,l...~ .. 97401 J , . I 541-682-3736 "., _ _Date He,saiyed -~ -M~B~!1:Z0ri}. , - PlanQ~r:-BJ ''';'/ \ . -.......... Office of "the Secretary of State Archives Division MARY BETH HERKERT Director BILL BRADBURY Secretary of Slale 800 Summer SL NE Salem, Oregon 97310 (503) 373-0701 Facsimile (503) 373-0953 March 21, 2007 Lane County Local Government Boundary Commission .Paula L Taylor 99 East Broadway, Suite 400 Eugene OR 97401-3111 Dear Ms. Taylor: Please be advised that w~ have received and filed the follow~gAnnexation(s): Ordinance Number. Our File Number Date EC SF 07-02 C EU 07-05 (City of Springfield) (City of Eugene) AN 2007-0147 AN 2007-0148 3/07/07 3/07/07 Please verify the effective date(s) for these annexations through the .application of ORS 199519 Our assigned file number(s) are itlcluded" with the above infor'mation. Sincerely, c+ 0--) <- 13~-z Linda Bjornstad OfficiaI Public Documents cc: Lane County Clerk ODOT /Highway Division PRC/Population Research Center Revenue Cartography Section Date Received MAR 2 1 200n-' Planner: BJ .WWWServer-http://at:cweb.sos.state.or.us . IntemetE:mail- reference.archives@State.or.us "" Oregon ~nealogy Listserv - or-roots@archive14.sos.state.<?r.us ., Dregon Lane County LocaI Government Boundary Commission 99 East Broadway Suite 400 Eugene, OR 97401-3111 . (541)682-4425. FAX (541) 682-2635 , '11"\\ March 15,2007 .' TO: ~my Sowa, Recorder, City of Springfield l W FROM: Paula L Taylor, Executive OfficQJ().. . SUBJECT: EC SP 07 ~ 02 (Expedited Procedure) . ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD (Crane) By this correspondence, lei it be known Ihat: , I. A petition for annexalion of lerrilory to .Ihe Cily of Springfield-Iocaled in southeasl ' Springfield, north of Jasper Road, easl of S 42nd Street, and south of the Union Pacific Railroad tracks (TI8S R02W S05 Map 21 laX lot 8700}--was filed on December 15, 2006, with the Lane COUnIy Local Government Boundary Commission in accordance with ORS 199,466 and ORS 199,490(2)(a)(B). . 2. An analysis was prepared by the boundary commission slaffwith a recommendation of approval and was sent on January 2, 2007, to the Lane boundary commission members; Lane CoUnty commissioners; Lane Counly Land Management" Division; Lane County Environmental Health Division; City of Springfield; Willakenzie Rural Fire Protection. District;Willamalane Park arid Recreation District; Ted and Jeannine Crane; and Chris Nash at Poage Engineering. . 3. No requesl for public hearing was received by 5:00 p.m., January 9, 2007. 4. This annexalionproposal, described in attached Exhibit A and shown on attached map Exhibit B, is hereby approved and effective January 9, 2007 (ORS 199.466 and ORS 199.519). Please acknowledge receipl of this correspondence. NOTE: The annexation area is within the Willakenzie. Rural Fire Protection District and will automatically be withdrawn in accordance with ORS 199.51O(2)(a). In accordance with. ORS 199.S10(2)(c): the annexation area is. hereby part of the Lane County Metropolitan Wastewater Service District and the Willamalane Park and Recreation District. . . Date Received Attachmenls cc: Ted and Jeannine Crane WilIakenzie RUral Fire Protection District Willamalane Park and Recreation District MAR 2 1 ZOQ7, Planner: PBJ ~. i! n -l,l;"b.nr~."'-'F-:;{H U d ~P~Ff fWlJiD.o\D 1\/, ''1...'" -_.\_~~. .,. ~ --"":;"':;.j---+-.._-+ -+-- +--.. _,--:~",:_ -..;,.-- :::':=::':i"~.::;.. 1.~Olc.. ".~ 10~ .0' If- 700 1.701oC... . f(m'~ \J., G ,.. " " ......~..=. " ~= J;,.l 120~~ ;: cuo :(:)1- ~'~j' . i. . " .j' ~. '.' ,& "L:.-,<r J . ~ ~ - WU".".... L.,,,,.+,, 13110 Q.44N;. q \, , , , "0 i'o.~N:. ~i~ """. ..~- . "V''''-'I L ANNEXA nON AREA Includes 11. 8700,18-02-05-21 Owned by Ted and Jeannine Crane (EC SP 07 - 02) ., ... J , ! N ~CAk \.Lv.. kn...., .... .11 ~~ " REET / i 20~~ ,,;;.. ,. Qo~-- ~ ,~;, 1'..0 " <:;'" Y' ,.. ~ . .- . -'-'4:....-B.OAD '" ,.,. ;r .....- n , EC SP 07 - 02 Page 1 of 1 .,r~,,---,,~"'l:>IlILo--.____'_ .n~ f ..~ .11 : . ~,. I ,/\ I -i ~ I I I !. . "!: Ii, 6000 I .~:~ i.' 1 " 0-1 .: ill ; 6100 ~~ fr. I '"./oC. .~ .,i I , : -~~r .;~_-.:._-_--=:,~~-- I>I-~ --___-"'-"__~___U i ,__.. ...~ I 11 -. --'~ _ ,..- \ -.. I 6600 I' . &700 I I I I I I 1\- ..- ,-::. 1 I I. II I I I. "I l I ,; I 1\ k - I. I I' F. I; I 1 r I - II I I I I i. I I I , I. ,.I! · CO~N -',,-.:".,1 --'-~-o- OAD --- - I j,_ _J_~_ . _ 0300 ~" '" ( II.... , 8-400, ,. "... ~ -- ,,,"..one. ,: ~ ~1 " " ~. ~-+ . - ': "\J ,.._._;{!UJ ..- . ~ , ..!- rl1 . , -..- ~., . ~ ' r-'-......--__ ~,7:---:---..-~., ~.~-'_"~ . :::..~Lcounty w Rood ,.." No 49, . ~_ " __'c..__~ i'I~.,.--F--.-.--'-,,-.,.-1 ----- fl-~"'4 \ _ !.__",__ .000 9100 , "'-- J J:':-p~'[ , ""' 1 ,..~ ;: p MAR 2 1 200n -I I I I I . ~ . "r_JI' -i ..:.- --~...~......-.,. _u.-' .- Planner: BJ r~. EXHffiIT A Beg at a pt in ihe cen of Co Rd No. 287, sd pt being on ihe W Ii of ihe David Arthur DLC 47 Tl7S R02W WM 1,827.10 ft Sooo03'W ofihe NW corihereof; th S890 lO'E 35.00 fllo a pi on ihe E mar of Co Rd No. 287, sd pt being Ihe TPOB; Ih alg sd E mar Sooo03'W 300.00 n; ih leaving sd E mar S890IO'E 252.12 n; th Nooo03'E 300.00 ft; ih N890IO'W 252.12 n to ihe TPOB, all in Lane County, Oregon LCBC:LCOG: L\BClLEGALI2007lECSP0702 LGLDOC Last Saved: March 14. 2007 .. EC SP07 -02 . PageIofl , , .Date Received MAR 2.1 200n Planner: BJ , .. "- " -oregon. ./ January 2, 2001' LANE COUNTY LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION 99 East Broadway Suite 400 Eugene, OR 97401-3111 (541) 682-4425 FAX (541) 682-2635 TO: Boundary Commission Members; Lane County Commissioners; Lane County Land Management Division; Lane County Environmental Health Division; City of Springfield; Willamalane Park and Recreation District; Willakenzie Rural Fire Protection District; Ted and Jeannine Crane; and Chris Nash at Poage Engineering SUBJECT: Paula L Taylor, Executive Offie?~ rI-~ EC SP 07 - 02 (Expedited Procedure) ANNEXA nON OF TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD (Crane) FROM: I Enclosed is a copy of ihe staff analysis for this proposal. It is sent to you as required by pRS 199.466. Please read the analysis carefully. The proposal is recommended for aooroval without a oublic hearing or further staff study. I I There are two alternatives: I. If yo\! agree wiih this recommendation, you need do noihing. 2. If you feelihat a public hearing is needed, you must request, in writing by January 9, 2007; ihat a hearing should be set. The request must be in the commission's office by 5:00 p_rn., Januarv 9th. You must use ihe form ihat is provided at ihe end of the staff analysis to request a hearing. For units of government, iheform should be signed by the chairman/mayor or other authorized person. If you or your unit of government requesls a public hearirig, ihe boundary commission asks , ihat you attend ihe requested public hearing. If a hearing is requested, it will be set for ihe next available' boundary commission public h~aring_ IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THE PROPOSAL OR PROCEDURE, PLEASE CONTACT OUR OFFICE (541-682-4425). " ; , Attachments . pl-- LCRC: L:IBC\EXPIMEMO\2007\ECSP0702 MEMDOC Last Saved: November 9. 2006 Date Reeeived MAR 2l200~1. Piann~r: BJ .' EXPEDITED PROCEDURE - STAFF ANALYSIS LANE COUNTY LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION Annexation of Terntol'Vto the (:itv ofSnrimdield (Crane) 1. BC File EC SP 07 - 02 . , Initiated by Resolution. 06-39 of the City of Springfield with property ()Wner/elector. consents ',I. Action under ORS 199,466 and I 99,490(2)(a)(B) of the boundary commission law Received December 15, 2006 " Public hearing requests required by January 9, 2007 pescrintion . The ~exation area includes' one full tax lot located. in southeast Springfield, no~ of Jasper Road, east of S 42nd Street, and south of the Union Pacific Railroad tracks Property owners: Ted and Jeannine Crane (885 S 42"" s,;..., Springfield) Tax lot: 8700, T18S R02W S05 Map 21 Acres: or 1.71 Estimate of existing population: 5 (one single family residential unit) ExistyIg land use: Residential ' Existing zoning in Lane County: LDR/UF-lO, low-density residential with urb!iIpzing fringe overlay district Applicable comprehensive plan: Eugene_Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan (acknowledged August 1982 and as subsequently amended) Existing public services to the property: Police (Oregon State Police/Lane County , . Sheriff), schools (Springfield School District 19), r~ads (Lane County, qty of Springfield), fire (Willakenzie Rural fire Protection District contracting with the City of Springfield) Reason for Ann.exation 'The annexation is being requested by the owners to prepare the property for future { .residential deve10pment Annexing the property will facilitate the provision of 'kban services when they are needed as required by the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan, Area General Plan.. This annexation proposal was filed with the boundary commission on December 15, 2006, in accordance with ORS 199,490(2)(a)(B), initiated by the City of Springfield with the consents from the property owners and electors. Prior to initiating the annexation, the City of Springfield received written consent to the annexation from the property owners (Ted and Jeannine Crane) and a majority of the eligible electors. At the time the annexation was initiated by thb. city council, there were two electors registered within'the annexation area.and written consents':were rlc:,\pi),c1ix~iJ,. :tt.~Vl;~otp electors (Ted and Jeannine Crane). The statutory provision to receive cdnsent . v. Ffrorrf2bwnets'-of more than one-half the land area and a majority 1lIltEtlfftJee1fed .11')'.'. . \' ",'" of T.j'l -,. 'lgl~j. LCLGBC Staff Analysis (EC SP06-57)- January 2,2007 ," "'T:\ 11 d:'~'" . , 1:~' . Page..l"0f'9AiQ-. . t /I~: :: t....J-lb !it ~'.. '''/~ I MAR U 20B"f' "'1..--' :i. Planner: BJ 199.490(2)(a)(B)] is met. The city, as the applicant, requested that the provisions of ORS 199.466 ( expedited procedure) be used in processing ~s annexation request. ( . . I" . ORS 199.466 authorizes ~pproval of annexations without a public hearing or adoption of a final order if requested by the principal .petitioner. Undq-the expedited procedure, the boundary commission executive officer. must prepare an analysis of the proposal within 15 days from its receipt. If, after 25 days from the filing date (in this c~se, January 9th), no written objections are received from direct recipients of this staff analysis, tpe request is approved. However, if any direct recipient of this staff analysis does object, . the proposal is scheduled for the next regular boundary commission public hearing. The direct recipients of this staff analysis are 'the individuals eligible to request a public hearing and <ire listed below under the first boundary commission standard. I. . The proposed annexation involves one tax lot (refer tolMaps No.1 and 2) kId is developed with one single-family residence occupied. The annexation area is within the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area G~eral Plan (Metro Plan) urban drowth boundary (U'GB), which is located about 900 feet to the south. The annexation area is zoned LDR/UF-IO, low-density residential with urbanizing fringe overlay, in Lane County. Upoh the effective date of the annexation, the UF overlay,will lapse and the annexation area will be zoned LDR in Springfield. 1 Resolution No. 06-39, unanimously approved by the Springfield city council on September 18, . , 2006, indicated that the annexation area can be provided with key urban services and requested that the resolution be forwarded to the boundary commission. Following is a brief analysis of each of the bOl!ndary Jmmission standards. . I . I Provide an impartial forum for resolution of local.jurisdictional questions. Consider the effects of the boundary change on other units of governments. ORS 199.410(1)(b) and 19~410~)~) i I This annexation request was filed in accordance with provisions in ORS 199 and was determined , to be a valid filing in accordance with OAR 191-06. (adopted administrative rule on boundary commission filing requirements). The petitioners req4ested the proposal be processed u,sing the expedited procedure. This staff analysis was sent to the following directr recipients: Lane boundary commission members, Lane County commissioners, Lane County ~and Management Division, Lane County Environmental Health Division, Willamalane Park and Recreation District, City of Springfield, Willakenzie Rural Fire Protection District (RFPD), Tbd and Jeannine Crane, and .Chris Nash at Poage Erigineering. 'I . I The annexation area is within the Willakenzie RFPD, which contracts with the City of Springfield for fire services. After the effective date of the. annexation, fI\~~eari:illbe. ed' withdrawn automatically from the fire district in accordance'with ORS 199.5IO~tUe necelY :'.",. O<.l'i'<<". u-,l: {~;;I!"\>:: ; . I .":C'" '~'J,"l1{'-1!. IY:". ... . . . MAR 21 20lllT ,.j rnnt ~ t AfJ;l ' ! LCWBCStaffAnalys.is (EC SP 06- 57) - January 2, 2007j , Planner", 8J . Page 2 of9 :{~ , .,... , ,.~."'" ~ '. ~__I'''''"'/"'t~ J .~ :~...~,~. ~~.?:' ::~ ';./'\' Upon the annexation effective' date, the area wilI be annexed automatically to the Lane County Metropolitan Water Service District and the Willamalane Park and Recreation District [ORS 199.510(2)(c)] because the city is a part of both these special districts. The Lane County Metropolitan Wastewater Service District was formed to provide the financing for the reliional wastewater treatment plan serving wastewater users within the cities of Eugene and Springfield. This request is consistent with this standar~1. ,j Consider the orderly determination and adjustment of local government boundaries to best meet the ne.eds of Lane County and Oregon. Consider alternative solutions Ji:here intergovernmental options are identified and make decisions based on the most effective long- range option among identified alternatives. ORS 199.410(1), 199.410(2), and 199.410(3}(a) ~~ - :1 The annexation area is located within the acknowledged UGB of the Metro Plan. TeITitory ~ithin the UGB ultimately will be within the City of Springfield. The annexation area is ,contiguous to the City ofSpririgfield. This annexation is consistent with boundary comrmsslOn administrative rule implem.enting policies (1), (2), (5), and (7) which recognize annexation to an existing city as the preferred method of servicing urbanizable land. II (1) This policy recognizes cities as the logical providers of urban levels of service within urban growth boundaries when consistent with the comprehensive plah_ , .!! (2) This policy expresses the commission's preference for providing urban seivices through annexatioI?- to a city in order to provide urban services to urbanj,zable lands. (5) This policy encourages provision of urban levels of service within urban gi-owth boundaries. (7) '. This policy expresses the commission's preference for annexation to an ex'isting city over all other alternatives as a means of extending services to urbanizable lands. ' Implementing policy (3) recognizes that in order to meet the long-term objectives of annexing out to an acknowledged urban growth boundary, short-term boundaries are created which are logical within the context of the future service boundary. The proposed anitexation is a logical extension of the city limits since it i~ in an area which is totally surrounded by the City of . . Springfield. . This proposal to annex territory to ~.<. " _ sq~i~sion P,9!jqes and this standard. . I , . .\I~'-.' Y,,-,tl'-"':: ,:,"1 ~"!'\. ..-' .~ I"...!J..,., ......'1, !l '>";.'.t~~...~..,_....." the City of Springfield. IS consistent with boujJdary Date ReQeived GGn) i .~ \li,:~ LCLGBC StaffAIl.alysis (EC SP 06 - 57) - January 2, 2007 ~ \.dPage'3,of;9"f..~:A;,,' . ' il t/ if ...,";;:.j" 'I" 1.'\"'1\!. '. I .;,t~;J\>:,tI,;..: t. t.I;,.JliJ , Iii .....-.. " MAR 21 2007" ': ~- Planner: 8J Make boundary commission determinations which are consistent with acknowledged local comprehensive plans. Assure an adequate quality and quantity of public services required in the comprehensive plan to meet existing and future growth. For major boundary changes, there must be assurance that the proposed unit oj government is financially viable. ORS . 199.410(1)(d), 199.410(3)(b) and (d). ,. The Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan is the applicable comprehensive plan and was acknowledged by the Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC) in August 1982 and has been subsequently amended. Th:e Metro Plan recognizes annexation as the highest priority for extending the minimum range of~rban services to urbanlzable areas (policy #8 and policy #10, page ll-C-4) and recognizes that' ultimately, all territory within the urban growth boundary will be annexed to an existing city (p~licy #] 6, page ll-C-5). . . , The annexation area is designated low-density residential in the Metro Plan, Upon the effective date of the annexation, the. annexation area will be zoned LDR, low-density residential, ~~~h~~~~ I ' , . I The following services are either available or can be eitended to the annexation area. .., '. Water - Springfield staff indicates that the Springfield Utility Board (SUB) will be the water provider and is in support of the annexation, A ] 2-inc~ water line located in S 42nd Street serves the existing house and can serve new development when needed, .. I I , I Electricitv - Springfield staff indicates that the annexation area is provided electrical service by SUB. N.ew development canbeprovided electric service after annexation occurs..- Police service - The Springfield police department carl provide police protection to the area after , annexation without jeopardizing service in other parts of the city. Police protection and response to priori,tYcalls C!lll be provided to the annexatiori area consistent with service protection throughout the city. Fire and emerQ:encv services - The annexation area ~ is within the Willakenzie RPFD, which provides fire se0ces within its. boundaries throughl a contract with the City of SpringfieId. Following the annexation effective date, the territory 'will be withdrawn automatically from the . , . fire district in accordance with ORS ]99.510(2)(a). After annexation, the City of Springfield will provide service directly. City fire stations are located!near S.47th Street and Main Street, and S th ' . . 68 Street and Main Street. \. E~ergency medical transport (ambulance) services ar~ provided on'a regional basis by Eugene, Springfield, and Lane Rural Fire/Rescue to central LaAe County, including the south Springfield .area. The annexation area will continue to receive I this service cOllsistent with the adopted ambulance service area (ASA) plan. Mutual aid agI:eements have been adopted by the three re~onal A~A p:o~~ers to provide backup coverage fot each other; s jurisdicti<JN' t R . . d ,\.:r.~"I":!~)~~-<: f)J,~C)\ . u8 e ecelve BQOS 1 If P.M~ . ,LCLGBC Staff Analysis (EC SP 06 - 57) - January 2, 2007 . It .......... ' h~'"1 I , 'P' ..4-."9'--'....'.""" , ..i age '01: ,11.,,,,,1 H. ' ' \:" '':''':''':<; ;t- l:'~ i ..ae 1:...._... . , I i MAR 21 200'"C Planner: BJ Parks and Recreation -The annexation area is not within the Willamalane Park and Recreation District and will automatically annex t? the district upon ~exation to the city. The city of Springfield is part of the park district and city residents receive park and recreation serVices;,from the district. The district operates two aquatic centers, a community center, an adult activity center, and 3 I parks containing a variety of outdoor recreational amenities. The closest pa{ks to the annexation area are Volunteer Park and Douglas Garden Park. Parks system developplent charges will be issued for new residential development occurring within the annexation ar~a:, !i Schools - Springfield School District 19 currently serves this area. Existing schools serving this neighborhood-Mt. Vernon elementary, Agnes Stewart middle, and Thurston high-will ~erve the annexation area. City staff notes that the school district provides service to residc;:ntial development on a district-wide basis_ ., Wastewater - Springfield staff indicates that an S-inch wastewater lateral line has been extended from the. S-inch. public main in S 42nd Street to serve the annexation area. It has suffiCient capacity to serve existing and new development within the ~l!lexation area, . i: , " Stormwater - City staff indicates that a public IS-inch stormwater line has been extended to the annexation area from the 24-inch line located in S 42nd Street. The public system has adequate capacity to accommodate existing and new development within the annexation area. ' Streets - Springfield staff indicates that S 42nd Street is annexed to the city and was impro~ed to full city standards during City Street Project P20347 last summer. The annexation afea is adjacent to S 42nd Street. New street development and access issues will be addressed duiing a future development process. " Solid waste management - Private firms and individuals collect and transport solid waste to the Lane County administered landfilL Community facilities.- Various providers offer both wire and wireless communication s~ces in the Eugene-Springfield metropolitan area. Land use controls - The property is within Springfield's portion of the Eugene-Springfield metropolilan urban growth boundary. Through an intergoverrunental agreement between :'Lane County, the city already has planning and building jurisdiction for this property. The citY will continue to administer land use controls after annexation. The minimum level of required services are either immediately available or can be provided within a reasonable future time frame as needed, This request is consistent with this standar~L Consider the comprehensive pl~n 's economic, demographic, and sociological.trends.' and projections and its environmental policies, pertinent to the proposaL ORS 199.410(3)(d) and . .,~~?i~..2P)~;'-I'. I !j,.,J l~.. .....j. \l~:,...I,-,! L;.'~tt~t".~,:. .,t ,/'l-:":,,.,.~.~j!f ". ':.r.u.r..:f\~. Dale ReceNed "ffil.'~' C = .fA" <~\1IJ...1 ".' l\i~ " ..!lmI'll I: -- ;1 ': iC--nLCLGJ?G;,Staff A:iJ,alysis (EC SP 06 - 57) - January 2, 2007 i. "'''' .-"J . \,(... '" ' \~ tl,; \i' :1 .='Page'50f9". ..'" . PBnrim: BJ ~ The annexation proposal is consistent' with the Metro Plan, which is an incremental step in implementing the long-range plan for this area. The urban growth boundary, land uses, and policies in the Metro Plan were developed to meet the future needs of the metropolitan community, The proposed use and plan designations are .consistent with the long-range plans for the area. This request is consistent with this boundary commission standard, Recommendation The boundary corru:i1ission staff recommends tHat the. proposed. annexation to the City of Springfield (EC SP 07 - 02) be approved without the hearing and staff report as required by ORS 199.466.. . ,. . .. ,I . . . If a public hearing is requested, the proposal will be heard at the next available public hearing. If - , none is requested it will be approved and effective January 9, 2007 (ORS 199.466 and ORS . . I 199,519). ' . . I. ### , ., I I .f11p.' i 1J QA'" ' IlJl...\. fJ. .IH Date Ralvtd MAR IllOOryJ Plannar:BJ ,. .,. tOO, * If' ....,-....,.,;'l~......... I~';;'. j /r" a::;" /' . 'l- ," ,';\.b1" '...,..I -..". ~ - , 01 : . :~..:: ,~i!!~{':{\...;I~~~~, 'V.E. }\\....l ',: ~:ji J.:.etGBe\Staff,Analysis (Ee SP 06 - 57) - January 2, 2007 ,-,,'11,.. . -." 'L,,-,j}:1 ll" .T'l,.:JI, f-' - .C'. .Pag;'{(6.0'f9' h . Sign and return this form to the boundary commission office ONLY if you desire that a public hearing be held. Office: 99 East Broadway, Suite 400, Eugene, Oregon 97401-3111 Pursuant to ORS 199.466, I REQUEST THAT A PUBLIC HEARING and STAFF. . STUDY be conducted on an armexation of territory to the City of Springfield (Crane, 'EC SP 07 - 02), as required by ORS 199.46I. This form must be filed in the commission office no later than 5:00 p.m., Januarv 9.2007, . Reason for public hearing: Date Signature Title Representing Note: If you or your agency request a pubIic hearing, the commission asks that you attend the requested hearing. pr.. Lcse L..\BClEXPI2007IECSP0702 SNDOC Last Saved: December 28,2006 ., . /!'" . tl I' 'iDl' 0" , ,- .. .. !.t;. ~f gt;l'~l~\i;"; :"'. .t.r;; /" I 'p' ".I.:,J'''I'':-'./ r ,~j,I'''''\, ' :!--. ....~ Date Received. MAR 2 1 200'1.1. Planner: BJ '81"- , . I,';i\: ,- (I './. :,. . . r:CLGBC "Staff AnalysIs (EC SP06 - 57) - January 2, 2007 Ii ~~" n 7 f9 .j /)( rt.age). fB. '- r r;-'" l.n,._",,~ '- !!i;:-iJill;.ry~,.V.i ... .,nl:,:,<:-,t:: : ~1'( \. / !"': ~~~ ;{.? .. .....,,., -". '1 ',. r 'j;'" :;-"; ~\.' II G'1f!l):\' 'I : .: fl;,~:'''<':r.:' ~.I " ~~5.t..;j~~J . .,..,. JI1.!.J1 .. ~ ~ :" n:j'Ur;, ," }',;.' . AJl ~ ." p j. I I I ~~ I ~: (~: ,~ :"(~:. I~~ ". cBCIJ3B"(,';:StaffArialysis (Ee SP 06- 57) - January 2,2007 I I; lJ~.t) UI. '.t.:....." Page 8 of9 \ I I~ H ll.-' ) MAP No.1 VILmu r MAP . Annexation to Springfield (Crane) EC SP 07 -02 , u H Oat MtlR 21 ZOO1J p\anner:'. BJ' MAP No.2 SITE MAP Annexation to Springfield (Crane) ECSP07-02 REET r i. d~ i 20<~205" ~_ ' ~, 00;- ~ 20~ : 3 I.~ ,-" <fJ 'r ',,' ~'~ -...~'::. .Jf'.L. ,-...---- -1 I * l I. J--. ...---.. ~ =- _ _ 'I,. ... ~.._. [...W-I1fF." ...;,:.;.~.... ~::';"~ ..A1i~.. ..#-..~.. ,I.",,:, ~l ; .20' ~;O~T~~J. - '-"BOOTH"-";;~F~~"-" t _. -,................- 701 :;:-r....;;::::;;r-..1.:".. 1.0Il ~ - ,""" -.."'- .. - 700 t.7DN:.. - (I , I , I I :1 1 I. I I ._L \..: _Q,,1- = -J~~ ..i --1' ,1" 8>00 '-""'. , 0.11". 1200 ="'- -12.~..~. Q.JO .-. "'," ~:'" 'l~' "it I q. 'L;;.,{j- Jff 'a-l'f I.,...;tr. 1300 Q.<HN::. n I ~ . , . :. . J 1111 JJ;:;-" 1:301 II o.<I1,e . o ," ~H~" I"~ . '" ~. ~ . I ,- :f, .u..." ~i~ 9000 9100 ~V-.:.:...!l- ANNEXATION AREA Includes TL 8700, 18-02-05-21 Owned by Ted and Jeannine Crane (ECSP 07 - 02) .~~ .e! ,. .-. I .,. .', ;< . ! ! N ~C4k Lt."-kl'l<o........ ,:;'m. ""', ;{_'_r..I~!!" .-. ., ,..". J"'~_ Ii5DO 0402 , , , . . =~,-.-BOAD' '" .",. " ,...- /-", ,"... ~ ~-+ ~n - ,;;." ~~.. P. 6-\00 ~ . . ~...~ I; IUII.c. l. b' . '~'-- .'-<1 !".I '. ~ -- ~ 1 ,- :' : ,-- f'..:-., : -I - . . .""'-" 0iiiT___ t7'iJ:"- ~-----=:~ -.- -'o-'U' ". . . COOnty Road . No. 49. . '" , _ _ ':.. _ En RQtO ~ ..~;.. -.1 i'\'" ---"--/f .. -,-=r-,lf ~..r If" f' -;;., __ !.__oa__ , ~1 )i , ( . .tCLGBC Staff Analysis (EC SP 06 - 57) - January 2, 2007 Page 9 of.9 Planner: BJ ;-; RESOLUTION NO 06-39 A RESOLUTION INITIATING ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRiTORY TO THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD AND REQUESTING THAT THE LANE COUNTY LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION APPROVE THE ANNEXATION BY EXPEDITED PROCESS WHEREAS, the Co=on Council is authorized by ORS 199.490(2)(a)(B) to initiate annexation upon receiving consent in writing from a majority of the electors registered in the territory proposed to be annexed and written consent from owners of more than half the land in the territory proposed to be annexed; and, WHEREAS, one hundred percent of the property owners of the territory signed the consent to annex petition (Exhibit 1); and, WHEREAS, one hundred percent of the registered voters within the territory signed the attached consent to annex petition; and, WHEREAS, the territory to be annexed is within the Eugene-Springfield Urban Growth Boundary and can be provided with UIban services. NOW THEREFORE THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: ~ection 1: The Co=on Council of the City of Springfield does hereby reco=end approval of the expedited annexation of the. subject territory to the City by .the Lime County Local Go"emment Boundary Commission, Lane County, Oregon, said territoi)' being described as follows: Township 17 South, Range 2West, Section 05, Map 21, Tax Lot 8700, more particularly described ill Exflibit 2 of this Resolution. ~ection 2: The Council furth~ requests that the Lane County Local Government Boundary Commission approve the proposed annexation authorized by ORS 199.466 without the study, . public hearing and adoption ofa final order required by ORS 199.461. . $ection 3; This Resolution shall take effect upon approval by the Council and approval by the Mayor. ADOPTED by the Common Counciloffue City of Springfield this 18thday of September 2006, by a vote of 6 for and O. against. . APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Springfield ibis 18thday of September, 2006 Date Received, ATTEST: -/:L MAR 21 2007 i . . ~- .~~ City Recordet{) '--' Mayor Planner: BJ R~Il'1S"",\~ fu.>\) t'l1' i'~~UE\) A~ \\:> I"..~v... . -:3 ",,~.I'\ :> ~P""'j () f'-i"'~ ~ Of'- cr<'-I l'\"'\\"~1-"'5o-f 9.11'> IcE. ~c City of Springfield, Oregon CERTIFIED lRUE COPY . .~Mvn.-. city 1(Jcorder ., -; FORM #1 PETITION ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD . EXHIBIT 1~1 TO: LANE COUNTY LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION , . we, the undersigned, constitute the owners oht least one-half of the land area of the property described in the . attachment marked "Exhibit A AND . ' '. ~ We desire to be annexed to the City of Springfield. A map is attached marked'''Exhibit B,howing the affected territory and its relationship to the present city .limit boundaries. The annexation c.onstitutes a minor bounclary change under the Boundaiy Commission Act and should therefore be considered by the Boundary Commission and, after study", a Final Order should be entered by the Boundary . Commission. . - By . ~/;:/., 11 .. Date ';~Hv~~' ~ ~A, .C-~N-.....;: l:!<13S C, AZ~'7f. ~NL\FI ~t.91 DR . MJO-..JYuru.~,,--^- if ~,. Date 9 Lj- alp .::r~Nl'\\NC;: S. ~I\..\~ \395~'tZ.!:!907, '7pe.Ir-lL\fl~D OK By Date By MAP# \ 0- 02.. -OS- 2-1 . LOT# 0100 MAP#. LOT# .0 Date With the above signature, I a+n verifying that I have the authority to consent to the annexation on my own behalf or on behalf of my firm, agency or trust. Rcvisc:d 12128/00 Date Received . MAR21 200[) REsoLf~gnflI~ BJ -:. Exhibit "A" Legal Description of Property to be Annexed Assessor's Map I8-02-05-21.,Tax Lot 8700 EXHIBIT 2;;'1 Beginning at a point in the cehter of CO)lIlty Road No. 287, said point being on the west line of the David Arthur Donation Land Claim No, 47 in Township 17 South, Range 2 West of the Willarhette MeridiaiJ., 1827.1 feet South p003' West of the Northwest comer thereof; thence from said beginning point run South 89010' East 35.00 feet to a point on the east margin of County . Road No. 287. Said point being the true point of beginning. Thence along the east margin of . County Road No. 287 South OC03' West 300.00 feet thence leaving said east margin and iunning South 89010' East 252.12 feet Thence North OC03' East 300.00 feet. Thence North 89cIO' West 252.12 feet to the true point of beginning, all in Lane County, Oregon. Date Received MAR 21 2001; Planner: BJ RESOLUTION NO. 06-39 .I-j-I <011.' _. I ~~n,1;r.i1 ~"" 1 ::' ~fiil " 4~,::. . =j;""' ~. -r "'::~,,;:.-:.. Q'!;J ton :1DlIl ma :4ClI} ~lQ 3 'I ~~ 1J ; l~. 't:; 1. ~'t-'- ... Nil .... n. : ~.J,,~-~_ r'= ...- ----~.. '. - .;..... " I ..J -; r~" 8iC1 .. ~~~. ii: -~ i",f!.11 f.~ -- :tOO -'Ie', ........... - F----:~-_~ . ''"=:' JOO I.u;.....,-l~ ...,. ~. ~ :fr-'j~; :~.f:',.. 'lBCe 7700.2600 \ ; .::iDO...e!l ~Il. __ .:: ,. I I' IIi ,. " ... 0 ... ..:~~ .-.....-=:_.."'... ~.. ...... JOC Z - ~ N .,. . "-""-- . =rim-'~~I'~~ . r "----~-._-_.__.,__. l' ~~-'* lOOi. l....k, " . ,.,r ''''V'' . I ... ~ .or . ...- ..... ,~OQ i . II I a,Jcc , ,_ 1\ " :'UIl lJ I It l.ioJ-<- I. ,~.I'.c.'" . I I .." . ,- ., ., I' .. :'\' -~.~ - : j -.... -w..:' ~!... , I' -'-~:~:,: ---mld[ I II "-""ElI~" OR.- --' - ~ t . . -I-II' 1a1i2 ! p...-:nJ,._ ...- ;,t11 ~'3.~~ ~t Q.l!K. " I J. /' :....- g-,:.....oC., II":: ~ .., . \i . , -~. -:' -$- ~ 11 / ~BOI .... ~ "I ....",0.- -:-S._ J -~ . I I . .., ,,-. 1,' _. r. ""'( . .n I 11 __"..I ~'lU~1f.-IJ\\J I I I 1201 . .. I ~ ~ ,.,:~;.fr..-~.='_ . I I I CUlIl...c. ' 1 '_ I~ .~tt_y ,,:.'"':.:. . p .- -r."1"", ."il"';'~' .... ~ - l.!!: '''' 1, 'i, ~! (-!:-1:/ I '---~:"'-~--.;;;~lIo ~~~~.~'I.'.:'~l'~'---.;.. ~ .-'." J - -! r ,..>...-- - tz1.::;;( I:!r>" --,-- - ':'_c_ . ',.:~~~:-l- . ~ :;'=f: ,;~~'"': ~ii-~ 1..;, ..r.~; f[7r~~ t~::',~ I :~T~, ,",1_._. ~ ';.,f! '" - ---. l ~'~ I U. ~ ''.';P., ~ .)e.. c':''!o;", ~~400- ~ ~:t~~~.:,~;i';~~:~;U2!j.~~ '900 '''''!-' ---:;;.-' .,,,,., 1"",~ c:: I.t .-.,,,'. \{ !' I~I ~ ~""--'=-~":......;+-;rf-l'~--- '-r ....... !' . u '11~.'.10iU-:: ~1P',a,-~'!\'~~ '000 I " . . l' ~I.."'i;-~,~~,,~~'! 'I~ ] i -.1 "l -':~'. I I"t" . -'- ,.!~ _-i._ -r- "'--_' . . ~"'_ . J~;~~::;;~;"?;~;~~r "'t'D ,,00 IAI. :~~.~~i~t~g~ ;~,~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ;o~. '", -. ~~~. '""'~-"'"~ ,. ;, .....~.~~,...:.Ill. ....oJ. ~"'::,,;t I ~ I t ~;{:;}'./"\r~L~~oi i :: I .100 ~~~;fdt~L~)l~k~:____~___~ o.'~ I u...oc.. I ~-:-s!9 . ,i . .1 i ' " H . . -.~ I , ot"~f----7~-----'---:--:1:1 ,;;'; -r I'. Ir! I' I if-r~J: ,:%.;~' ~ ;~T:;: Ir 11 i i .. l, . I I I l " ;, . ~!. I I I) 0.;1 ,", __.;: p. I. I I' . t ~ ,"",0 I'. I,' I , Plannera a! ~ L ,t.."" l ~' I RE$CL1IJTION NO. 06,-39 '--/I.' 4 \ '" t: -.. 1 I I ..__h _ _ \.._:... ~..:-...:!!../ f:" 'I ...w.:~~r ~jl :r::-:t I I I ! .. ~ - . _ ilji1]i!JI,~----n)n ~p'N FA?).c "'..I"'..", '.\...':" ~i- .1: "Oo,. --";";:";'+---+-"--... ~.- ........~~'~,Ji,....;..... ~.~: -...~+-o.:-..._-!-_. ' -:;,.,...... ....- - ...-. . .....::..;...>:<:- -+-- ... . ;;:~r":::'''.. 1.:1:.. ICOJ,. : ~a..~~oc.. <I>" ~~ 1.D'''' . -""" a..lJloC. 'Q , -.... ., '1 .......,....... 100 .1.711'<' ~ '! ~4.n . I' " ,- '. '. "'-~l c.:.;' !~C::'- J. .It ~I - Ji,.t .,:. i l ...:" \~ .,'oc ,~ -,.... '~'.- . 'I '200 . -- T~_"' 1\'- ":."''1'" 1:~1.;,"'I1 .ij."I'--.'I=.: 1'\;1 ~~ L j) . \l,r..: '''VI q i~ s.z"'.. !',:](I). -li1ifjr VUJ l""o.'.:,.,-. StE M I'! 111 02. C,:D I. =0[]BJtcl]~rtftiStY~ " -o:..l"'~1 11- ., : \ 100 \U71C. .., ." , ISTREET I. .~l !. :j'+r~ it ~ ,~ Date Received MAR 2 1 20011 >04 . 'lO~ .:.. " .::-' ~ OJ ~,~ i 206' lOll ~ 0' /~, " q<:) ,. , .. .... ~.: ; , \ r _. , '. '7~.~1\."/! ,''Z:Ji:rc., ....-\~,.::::. ." ../, '" Be.<:. ::,:.- . Jr... '. ~?::~. '''''' .. l' ~,.P2. t.c;.~ .__ 1':. UDO ~ ';l4CO~. 1.'"OO . f'+~ .::..--:::.:. -.... ;;': l:I :L :~." J i~~'Ji.~'" ~ ~'-;:' ;~. ,: . .~ .....- - . .' . ..... ,~ 2lI ~ %:I" %II : :If &:'~-':: I ., .. ...- - - .,. . 'I_SOUTH_ ",~'F' ~fQ. ~~ -_.~- .'-.. .._.1~~~.:~ .. '" .r.-~ 1;sQQ.:'i 12~ "oo~. ltllXl 1110 r;C;; . . .~ i. : .: l. I : ,. I. : J' 11 ~ '.' ~ I II I. '6 .-.>-....-' , . ~l . ".- --. - "":,.,:}.oT., ~:t-:;;.... ...:'..~~.. ",;1';;:;... ,...,........ ...._.'; ----;:/.;- -~."'f;f=-----=f)-:---. ...........'. ......-..- .....-. ".~'."'-"KE . .f. SOOTH . eOUTHERNT - _.,...:::;. .., a:2.01. PACIFIC II I I I I il I ~)L'-':.~ -. ...-"...."" '\ ,,00- ~ "