HomeMy WebLinkAboutNotice PLANNER 11/4/2008
~
RECE\VED
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
NOV 4 2008
.
STATE OF OREGON)
)ss.
County of Lane )
.
By:l~ ~
I, Karen LaFleur, being first duly sworn, do hereby depose and say as follows:
1. I state that I am a Program Technician for the Planning Division of the
Development Services Department, City of Springfield, Oregon.
2. I state that in my capacity as, Program Technici.an, I prepar.ed. and caNsed ~o br
mailed copies of SU B 2ool:~oo() '-If f7ftJ-' e. ~ !'\.MfAJA>f, - ?~ ~
(See attachment "A") on /1/ 4- . 2008 'ddressed to (see ~
Attachment B"), by causing said, letters to be placed in a U.S. mail box with
postage fully prepaid th~reon. '
4~R h1ttcVn~
~TATE OF OREGON, County of Lane
~ (5)/'1 AJAhu ~S , 2008. Personally appeared the above mimed Karen LaFleur,
Program Technician, who acknowledged the foregoing instrument to be their voluntary
act. Before me: '
---
OFF;CIAL SEAL
DEYETTE KELL V
NOTARY PUBLIC - OREGON
COMMISSION NO, 420351
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES AUG, 15, 2011
/v~'</J~
My Commission Expires: ? //s/I/
,
!city .of Springfield
, Development Services Department
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
LAND DIVISION TENTATIVE PLAN
Staff Report & Decision
Project Name: Cress Partitien
Project Proposal: Divide .one let (.47 acre) inte two parcels
Case Number:' SUB2008-00041 '
Project Location: 603 33rd Street
17-02-31-24 TL 2300
Zoning: Low Density Residential (LDR)
Overlay District(s): Drinking Water Protectien (DWP)
Applicable Refinement Plan: Mid-Springfield
Refinement Plan Designation: Lew Density Residential (LDR)
Metro Plan Designation: Low Density Residential (LDR) ,
Pre-Submittal Meeting Date: August 15, 2008
Application Submittal Date: September 10, 2008
DRC Meeting Date: September 30, 2008
Decision Issued Date: Nevember 5, 2008
Recommendation: Appreval with Cenditiens
Appeal Deadline Date: Nevember 25, 2008
Associated Applications: PRE2008"00054; PRJ2008-00051
POSITION REVIEW OF .
I Planner II Land Use Planning ,
Transportatien Planning,Engineer Transportation
Public Werks Civil Engineer I' Utilities, SanitarY & Storm
Sewer
I Fire and Life Safety
, SUB Electric Utilities
I Deputv Fire Marshal
I Engineering Technician
NAME
Lissa Davis
Jen Driscell
Eric;Walter
PHONE
726-3632
726-3679
736-1034
Gilbert Gorden
Guenter Matyszak
726-2293
736-3296
Owner/Applicant
Gary P Cress
460 West 25th
Eugene OR 97405
Engineer
Marvin Krushl Krush and Asseciates
607 Hwy 99 Nerth
Eugene OR 97405
SUB2008-00041
DECISION
This staff report and decision grants approval with conditions to the subject application, as of the date
of this decision, ,The standards of the Springfield Development Code (SDC) applicable to each criterion
of approval are listed herein and are satisfied by the submitted plans and notes (see Appendix A)
unless specifically noted in this decision with, findings and conditions necessary for compliance, The
plat, as well as the installation of public and private improvements, must conform to the approved
tentative plan or as conditioned herein, This is a limited land use decision made according to city code
and state statutes. Unless appealed, the decision is final. Please r!!ad this document in its entirety.
REVIEW PROCESS
This application has been reviewed under the procedures listed in SDC 5,1-130, Type II Applications,
and SDC 5,12-100, Land Divisions - Partitions and Subdivisions, This application was accepted as
complete on September 11, 2008, and this decision is issued on the 55th day of the 120 days permitted
per ORS 227,178,
COMMENTS RECEIVED
Applications for Type II limited land use decisions require notification of property owners and occupants
within 300 feet of. the subject property and any applicable neighborhood association, allowing for a 14-
'day comment period on the application per SDC 5.1-130. The property owner, applicant, if different,
and parties 'submitting written comments during the comment period have appeal rights and are mailed
a copy of this decision for consideration. In accordance with SDC 5.1-130, notice was mailed to the
property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the subject property on September 11, 2008,
The following written comments were received during the comment period:
'One comment was received from Dave and Andrene Everson, 583 33rd Street. The full text of the
Everson's comments are made a part of this record by reference here and are available for review upon
request. Mr, and Ms, Everson's concerns relevant to the partition criteria of approval include lot size,
dimension, and overall density.
Staff response: Springfield Development Code Section 3,2-215 states that standard parcels on north-
south streets in all residential zoning districts shall have a minimum lot area'of 5,000 fl2. The applicant
is proposing to create two lots of 5,589' and 7,314 fl2. The application meets the above requkements for
lot size and dimension, These lot sizes fall within the allowable density (up to 10 units per acre) in the
Low Density, Residential (LDR) districts. See page 3 for more information regarding lot size and density.
SITE INFORMATION
The subject property is a :29 acre (12,632 fl\ irregular-shaped lot on the east side of S, 33'd Street
between Main Street and E Street and is located inside City limits. The property is relatively flat, and
soils are mapped as Awbrig-Urbah Land Complex-6, Currently, the property contains one residence,
taking access from S, 33m Street. The property is zoned and'designated Low Density Residential, and
land immediately surrounding the property on all sides is zoned Low Density Residential.
LAND DIVISIONS - PARTITIONS AND SUBDIVISIONS - TENTATIVE PLAN CRITERIA
SDC 5.12-125 states that an application shall be approved or approved with conditions upon
determination that the criteria listed in SDC 5.12-125 A through J. have been satisfied and that if
conditions cannot be attached to satisfy the approval criteria, the application shall be denied.
Criterion 11SDC 5.12-125 AJ
The request conforms to the provisions of this Code pertaining to lot/parcel size and dimensions,
Finding: SDC 3.2-215 states that on standard parcels on north-south streets in all residential zoning
districts, the minimum area shall be 5,000 sq. fl" and the minimum street frontage shall be 60 fl. In,
SUB20Q8-00041
2
addition, it states that on panhandle parcels in all residential zoning districts, the minimum ,area in the
pan portion shall be 4,500 sq. ft., and the minimum street frontage shall be 20 ft, for a single panhandle.
Finding: The applicant proposes to create two parcels as follows:
I parcell ,Parcel Type Area Street Frontage
I 1 I Standard 5,589 'sq, ft, 82 ft,
I 2 I Bulb of Cul-De-Sac 7,314 sq. ft, 60 ft,
Street
Name
S 33m
E Street
Street Type I
North-South I
East-West I
Finding: This application meets the requirements of,SDC 3.2-215.
Conclusion: This application satisfies Criterion 1 (SDC 5.12-125 A.),
Criterion 21SDC 5.12-125 B.~
The zoning is consistent with the Metro Plan diagram and/or applicable Refinement Plan diagram, Plan
District map, and Conceptual Development Plan.
Finding: The subject property is zoned Low Density Residential and is designated
Low Density Res[dential by the Metro Plan diagram and the Mid-Springfield Refinement Plan, There
are no applicable Plan District maps or Conceptual Development Plans for this property, and no change
to the zoning designation or boufldaries is proposed, '
Conclusion: This application satisfies Criterion 2 (SDC 5,12-125 B,).
Criterion 31SDC 5.12"125 C.\
Capacity requirements of public and private facilities, including but not limited to water and electricity;
sanitary sewer and storm water management facilities; and streets and traffic safety controls shal/ not
be exceeded and the public improvements shal/ be available to serve the site at the time of
development, unless otherwise provided for by this Code and other applicable regulations, The Public
Works Director or a utility provider shal/ determine capacity issues. .
Finding: The Development Review Committee (DRC), including representatives from the City's
Development Services Department, Public Works Department, and Fire and Life Safety Department, as
well as the Springfield Utility Board (SUB) reviewed the application, and their comments have been
incorporated into the findings and conditions below, '
Finding: Criterion 3 contains two categories of development standards with sub-sections, The
application as submitted complies with any applicable sub-sections of the development standards
unless otherwise noted with specific findings and conditions, The development standards relating to
Criterion 3 include but are not limited to the infrastructure standards discussed in SDC 4.1-100, 4,2-
100, and 4.3-100: '
4,2-100 Infrastructure Standards-'
Transportation.
4,2-105 Public Streets'
4,2-110 Private Streets
4.2-115 Block Length
4,2-120 Site Access and Driveways
4.2-125 Intersections "
4.2-130 Vision Clearance
4.2-135 Sidewalks
4.2-140 Street Trees
4,2-145 Street Lighting
4.2-150 Bikeways
4.3-100 Infrastructure Standards-
Utilities
4.3-105 Sanitary Sewers
4,3-110 Stormwater Management
4.3-115 Water Quality Protection
4.3-120 Utility Provider Coordination
4.3-125 Underground Placement of Utilities
4,3-130 Water Service and Fire Protection
4.3"135 Major Electrical Power Transmission Lines
4,3-140 Public Easements
4.3-145 Wireless Telecommunications Systems Facil,ities
SUB2008-00041
3,
~l"';':;~
.~-.
4,2"155 Pedestrian Trails
4,2-160 Accessways
Public Streets
Finding: Abutting the subject property to the west is S. 33rd Street, a 24-foot wide asphalt-paved
two-lane local street within a 60-foot right-of-way. The street is not fully improved to urban standards
with curb, gutter, sidewalk, street trees, or street lighting, and average daily traffic along this section of
S, 43rd Street is estimated to be fewer than 300 vehicle trips per day, Abutting the property on the east
is the cul-de-sac bulb ending E Street at Tyson Park. The bulb is fully improved to urban standards
with curb, gutter, sidewalks, street trees and, lighting, and daily traffic along this section of E Street is
estimated to be fewer than 300 trips per day,
Finding:SDC 4,2-105 G, 1 states that whenever an existing street of inadequate width is abutting or
within a development area requiring development approval, additional right-of-way is required, SDC
4.2-105 C. states that street right-of-way widths are as specified in Table 4.2-1, unless otherwise
indicated in TransPlan, the Conceptual Local Street Plan, or where necessary to achieve right-of-way
,and street alignment. ' .
According to Table 4,2-1, the minimum right-of-way on S'. 33rd between Main Street and Commercial
Avenue shall be 50 feet and the minimum curb-to-curb width shall be 36 feet since this segment of S.
33rd Street is a local street less than 1200 feet in length with fewer than 100,0 vehicle trips per day, The
minimum right-of-way on E Street between 34th and the end of the cul-de-sac bulb is 83 feet and the
curb-to-curb width is 70 feet. The roadway east of the cul"de-sac bulb requir~s a minimum right-of-way
of 50 feet and a minimum curb-to-curb width of 36 feet for local streets with less than 15 percent slope,
less than 1,200 feet in length with fewer than 1,000 vehivle, trips per day.
Finding: The applicant shows an existing 60 foot right-of-way dedication along the S, 33rd Street and E
Street frontages of the property in compliance with SDC 4'f-105 G.1,
Conclusion: This application meets the requirements of SDC 4,2-105,G.
'I
Finding: Based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) land Use Code
210 (Single Family Detached), full development of Parcel 2 with single family detached dwellings would
generate 10 weekday vehicle trips and 1 afternoon peak-hour vehicle trip into the surrounding street
system. In addition, assumed development may generate pedestrian and bicycle trips. According to
the LCOG household survey from 1994, 12.6% of household trips are made by ,bicycle or walking and
1,8% are made via public transit. These trips may have their origins or destinations at a variety of land
uses, including the subject property, Pedestrian and bicycle trips create the need for sidewalks,
pedestrian crossing signals, crosswalks;bicycle parking, and bicycle lanes.
Finding: SDC 4,2-105 G.2, states that whenever a proposed land division or development will
increase traffic on the City street system and the development site has unimproved street frontage, that
street frontage shall be fully improved to City specifications in accordance with the criteria listed in SDC
4,2-105 G.2.a, through d, SDC 4.2-105 G,2, Exception i. states that in all cases other than a, through
d. of this section, an Improvement Agreement shall be required as a condition of development approval,
postponing improvements until the time that a City street ir:nprovement project is initiated,
Finding: SDC 4.2-105 G,2, Exception i applies to ,the su~ject property since 4,2-105 G,2,a, through d.
do not.
Condition 1: Prior to plat approval, the applicant shall execute and record an Improvement Agreement
for paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, and street lighting on 33rd Street and street lighting on "E" Street.
Conclusion: As conditioned above, this application meets the requirements of SDC 4.2-105 G.2.
SUB2008-00041 4
Street Trees
,
Finding: 4,2-140 B,1. states that existing trees, may meet the requirement for street trees (i.e. trees on
the City Street Tree List specified in the EDSPM) if excavation or filling for proposed development is
minimized within the dripline of the tree,
Finding: No trees are shown on the application for either the 33rd Street or E Street frontages.
Condition 2: Prior to final plat approval, street trees are required pursuant to conditions stated in the
EDSPM Section 6, If these street trees will bei located on private property, maintenance of the trees
shall be performed by the property owner as per SDC 4,2-140 C,2.
Conclusion: As conditioned above, this application meets the requirements fo SDC 4.2-140,
Sanitarv Sewers
Finding: SDC4,3-1 05 A. states that sanitary sewers shall be installed to serve each new development
within the city limits and to connect developments to existing mains,
Finding: The application indicates that the existing residence on Parcel 1 is currently served by an
existing 4 inch sewer line stemming from the '8 inch line located on the east side (E Street right-of-way)
that is to be relocated. The application shows a 4 inch sewer line along the north edge of proposed
Parcel 2, dropping to the southwest to join the existing c1eanout for Parcel 1,
The application does not indicate if the residence on Parcel 2 is also served by a sewer lateral.
Condition' 3: Prior to final plat approval, the applicant shall install the sanitary sewer service as shown
on plans that include extending a new 4 inch lateral in the new 5 foot private utility easement to serve
Parcel1,and removing the existing 4 inch waste water lateral over, the building area on Parcel 2 where
an existing easterly stubbed portion will remain to serve Parcel 2,
Conclusion: Is conditioned, the application meets the requirements of SDC 4.3-105 A.
Storm water Manaoement
Finding: SDC 4,3-110 B, states that development approval shall only be granted where the Public
Works Director has determined that adequate public and/or private stormwater management systems
provisions, consistent with the EDSPM, have ,been made.
Finding: SDC 4,3-110 D, states that run-off from a development shall be directed to an approved
stormwater management system with sufficient capacity to accept the discharge,
Finding: SDC 4,3-110 E, states that new developments are required to employ drainage management
practices that minimize the amount and rate of surface run-off into receiving streams and that promote
water quality, ,
Finding: Plans submitted indicate that existing roof drains for Parcel 1 to'drain to existing 3 inch and 4
inch storm pipes, then extends to an existing ,roadside ditch on 33'd Street. A new 6 inch storm pipe
lateral is being proposed on the southeast corner of Parcel 2 for accepting roof drainage for the future
house on Parcel 2.
Condition 4: Prior to Final Plat approval, the applicant shall obtain necessary encroachment permit for'
the .installation of the new storm pipe construction for serving Parcel 2 as shown within the public right-
of-way, '
Conclusion: As conditioned, the application meets the resuirements of SDC 4,3-110,
SUB2008-00041
5
.?
~
."7
..... 1";'<.-'"'"
Utilitv Provider Coordination
Finding: SDC 4.3-120 states that all utility providers shall be responsible for coordinating utility
installations with the City and the developer through the Development Review Committee or by
separate written correspondenCe and that the developer shall be responsible for the design, installation,
and cost of utility lines and facilities to the satisfaction of the utility provider.
Finding: The application indicates that the subject property is currently served by SUB Electric via
overhead lines the northeast corner of the property. The applicant has proposed serving Parcel 1 with
underground lines within the proposed 10 foot Public Utility Easement located on the east side of the
property.
Condition 5: Prior to plat approval, the applicant shall extend electric service to Parcel 2 as per SUB
Electric standards, Placement of such facilities shall be in the proposed seven-foot frontage PUE and
shall be underground as conditioned in the Underground Placement of Utilities section below.
Finding: The applicant has proposed a 10 foot utility easement along the east side of Parcel 2 to
accommodate new utility lines.
Condition 6: Prior to plat approval, the applicant shall record and document a '1 O-foot private utility
easment on the east line of Parcel 2.
Conclusion: .As conditioned above, Ihis application meet the requirements of SDC 4,3-120.
Underaround Placement of Utilities
Finding: SDC 4.3-125 states that wherever possible, all utility lines shall be placed underground,
Finding: The application indicates that power currently serves the subject property via above-ground
lines from an existing utility pole on the southeast corner of the property.
Condition 7: Prior to plat approval, all utility lines to serve Parcels 1 and 2 shall be placed
underground,
Conclusion: As conditione<;l above, this application meets the requirements of SDC 4.3-125.
Water Service and Fire Protection
, , '
Finding: SDC 4,3-130 states that each development area shall be provided witli a water system having
sufficiently sized mains and lesser lines to furnish an adequate water supply: to the development and
that fire hydrants and mains shall be installed by the developer as required by the Fire Marshall and the
utility provider.
Finding: The application shows an 8 inch water line on 33'" Street and a 6 inch water line on E Street.
Condition: Prior to plat approval, Parcel 2 shall be serviced with a private water lateral from the water
main in the right-of-way east of the subject property and a water meter located, as per SUB Water
standards, NOTE: Plumbing permits are required to install this private water lateral.
Finding: Springfield Fire Code (SFC) 508 states that an approved water supply capable of supplying
the required fire flow for fire protection shall be provided to premises upon which a residence will be
constructed where any portion of that residence is more than 600 feet from an existing fire hydrant.
Finding: The nearest fire hydrant is located 15 feet north and 79 feet west of the northwest property
line. , '
Condition 8: As conditioned, this application meets the requirements of SDC 4.3-110.
SUB2008-00041
6
Public Easements '
Finding: SDC 4,3-140 A. states that the applicant shall make arrangements with the City and each
utility provider for the dedication of utility easements necessary to fully service the development or land
beyond the development area. This policy dictates that the minimum width for Public Utility Easements
(PUE) adjacent to street rights-of-way, as well as all other PUEs, shall be'seven feet, unless otherwise
specified.
Finding: The applicant has proposed a 7 foot public utility easement along the frontage of 33'd Street,
satisfying Section 4,3-140,A of theSDC, Additionally, an existing 10 foot public sanitary easement is
being shown on the plan on the east side of Parcel 2 for the existing 8 inch public sanitary line,
Additionally, a 5 foot irrevocable private sewer easement has been proposed .over Parcel 2 to benefit
Parcel 1,
Finding: The applicant is proposing Parcel 2 access via a driveway from "E" Street. The driveway is
being proposed in the existing public right-of-way adjoining ttie "E" Street cul-de-sac, The City right-of-
way may be used for drivewC!y access; however ft will be the responsibility of Parcel 2 property owner
to maintain the driveway and side yard adjoining adjoining. driveway within this City right-of-way.
Condition 9: Prior to approval of the Final Plat, the applicant shall enter into a maintenance
agreement with the City of Springfield for long term maintenance of the public right-of-way area used
for driveway access. The Agreement shall address maintenance and' use including, but not limited to,
landscaping, paving, and parking.
Condition 10: Prior to Final Plat approval, the applicant shall obtairi approval by the City Suriteyor and
record all said easements as shown on the plans,
Conclusion: As conditioned above, this application ,meet the requirements of SDC 4.3-140 A,
Conclusion: This application satisfies Criterion 3 (SDC 5.12-,125 C.) as conditioned herein.
Criterion 4 ISDC 5.12-125 D.I
The proposed land division shall comply with all applicable public and private design and construction
standards contained in this Code and other applicable regulations.
Finding: ,Criterion 4 contains four categories of development standards and requirements. As such,
the application must comply with the development standards of SDC Chapter 4 not addressed by
Criterion 3, as well as the development standards for the applicable zoning district not addressed by
Criterion 1. In addition, the application must comply with the requirements of any applicable overlay
district andlor refinement plan. The application as submitted complies with the applicable development
standards and requirements unless otherwise noted, with specific findings and conditions, The
development standards and requirements relating to Criterion 4 include but are not limited to the
following: '
Landscaoina.'Screenina & Fence Standards
Finding: SDC 4.4-105 D. states that all required setback areas shall be landscaped. SDC 4.4-105 E.
states that at least 65% of ,each required planting area shall be covered with living plant material.
Finding: There is some landscaping 'in conjunction with the existing residence on 33m Street.
Condition 11: Prior to final occupancy, all setback areas on Parcels 1 and 2 shall be landscaped in
accordance with SDC 4.4-105. ' '
SUB2008-00041
7
>~~.
l~ '""?'" .,*"",.".
.....~J:r~...
Vehicle Parkina. Loadina. & Bicvc/e Parkina Standards
Finding: SDC 4.6-125 states that a minimum of two off-street parking spaces are required for single-'
family and duplex dwellings. ' .
Finding: The application indicates that the existing residence on Parcel 1 is currently served by an
asphalt driveway, The application proposes that Parcel 2 take access via a new driveway to be
constructed within the right-of-way on E Street.
Finding: SDC Chapter 6 defines a parking space as a' permanently maintained paved surface with
proper access for one standard size or compact vehicle. "
Condition 12: Future development of Parcel 2 will require off-street parking in conformance with SDC
4.6-125,
Finding: Existing facilities, as well aS,the above condition, are adequate to meet the requirements of
SDC 4,6-125. "
Conclusion: This application satisfies Criterion 4 (SDt 5,12-125 D.) as conditioned herein.
Criterion 6/SDC 5.12-125 F.~
Parking areas and ingress-egress points have been designed to: facilitate vehicular traffic, bicycle and
, pedestrian safetyto avoid congestion; provide connectivity within the development area and to adjacent
residential areas, transit stops, neighborhood activity centers, and commercial, industriatand public
areas; minimize driveways on arterial and collector streets as specified in this Code or other applicable
regulations and comply with the ODOT access management standards for State highways.
Finding: The DRC, including representatives from the City's Public Works Department, reviewed the
application, and their comments have been incorporated into the findings and conditions below.
Finding: Installation of driveways on a street increases the number of traffic conflict points, The
greater number of conflict points increases the probability of traffic crashes. Therefore, SDC 4.2-120
A.1, states that all developed parcels shall have an approved access to a public street or alley along
the frontage of the property, a private street that connect!? to the public street system, or a publiC street
by an irrevocable joint use/access easement serving the subject property.
8002008-00041
8
, ,
Finding: SDC 4,2-120 C. states that driveways shall be.designed to allow safe and efficient vehicular
ingress and egress as specified in Tables 4.2-2 through 4,2-5, the City's EDSPM, and the Public Works
Standard Construction Specifications, According to Table 4.2-2, single~family and duplex dwellings
must conform to a one-way driveway minimum and maximum width of 12 feet and 16 feet, respectively,
SDC 3,2-220 5.a, states that the paving standards for panhandle driveways are 12 feet wide for a
single panhandle driveway from the front of the property line to a distance of 18 feet, where there is an
unimproved street.
Finding: The application indicates that existing access to 1 is via a 12-foot wide existing"driveway onto
33'" Street. and the applicant has proposed keeping this access for Parcel 1. The application proposes
the construction of a 16 foot driveway through the right-of-way at the end of the E STreet cul-de-sac
bulb, The application does not indicate what material shall be used for the proposed driveway..
,
Condition 13: Future development of Parcel 2 will require paved driveways.
, ' ,
,
Finding: Existing facilities, as well as the above condition, are sufficient to 'meet the requirements of
SDC 3,2-220 B. and SDC 4.2-120 C, ' ,
Finding: SDC 4.2-130 A. states that all parcels shall maintain a clear area at each 'access to a public
street in order to provide adequate sight distance for approaching traffic,'
Finding: SDC 4,2-130 B, states that no screen or other physical obstruction is permitted between two
and a half feet and eight feet above the established height of the curb in the triangular area. SDC 4.2-
130 C, states that the triangular area for driveways is ten feet along each property line.
Condition 14: Vision clearance areas shall be maintained at each access to a public street as per
SDC 4.2-130.
Finding: As conditioned above, this application meets the requirements ofSDC,4.2-130.
Conclusion: This application satisfies Criterion 6 (SDC 5.12-125 F.) as conditioned herein,
Criterion 7 (SDC 5.12-125 G:\ ,
Development of any remainder of the property under the same ownership can be accomplished as
specified in this Code.
Finding: No property under the same ownership remains, Therefore, Criterion 7 is not applicable,
. "
Conclusion: This application satisfies Criterion 7 (SDC 5,12-125 G.),
, ,
Criterion 81SDC 5.12-125'H.\
Adjacent land can be develop~r;I or is provided access that' will alloVli its development, as specified in this
Code. '
Finding: Adjacent land is currently developed with residential dwellings and has access to public
streets by way of direct frontage,
Conclusion: This application satisfies Criterion 8 (SDC 5.12-125 H.)
Criterion 9 (SDC 5.12-1251.\
Where the Partition of properly that is outside of the city limits but within the City's urbanizable area and
no concurrent annexation application is submitted, the standards specified in SDC 5.12-125/.1. and 2.
shall also apply. '
Finding: The subject property,is located inside the city limits, Therefore"Criterion 9 is not ap'plicable,
Conclusion: This application satisfies Criterion 9 (SDC 5.12-1251.),
SUB2008-0004 I
9
."~,!-._,,,,~.::!',
~~
Criterion 10 ISDC 5.12-125 J.\
Where the Subdivision of a manufactured dwelling park or mobile home park is proposed, the approval
criteria in SDC 5.12-125 J. 1 through 7 apply.
Finding: The application does not propose the subdivision of a manufactured dwelling park or mobile
home park, Therefore, Criterion 10 is not applicable.
Conclusion: This application satisfies Criterion 10 (SDC 5.12-125 J,).
SUMMARY OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL'
NOTE: This summary of the conditions of approval is provided as a courtesy to the applicant. The
applicant should, however, carefully read the decision 'in its entirety to understand the basis for each
condition. In addition, as stated earlier, the applicant must comply with the entire decision, and the plat,
as well as the installation of public and private improvements, must conform to the approved tentative
plan or as conditioned herein.
1. Prior to plat approval, the applicant shall execute and record an Improvement Agreement for
for paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, and street lighting on 33rd Street and street lighting on "E"
Street.
2, Prior to final plat approval, street trees are required pursuant to conditions stated in the EDSPM
Section 6. If these street trees will be located on private property, maintenance of the trees
shall be performed by the property owner as per SDC 4.2-140 C,2,
3. Prior to final plat approval, the applicant shall install the sanitary sewer service as shown on
plans that include extending a new 4 inch latera) in the new 5 foot private utility easement to
serve Parcel 1 and removing the existing 4 inch waste water lateral over the building area on
Parcel 2 where an existing easterly stubbed portion will"remain to serve Parcel 2:
4. Prior to Final Plat approval, the applicant shall obtain necessary encroachment permits for the
installation of the new storm pipe construction for serving Parcel 2 as shown within the' public
right-of-way. '
5. Prior to plat approval, the applicant shall extend electric service to Parcel 2 as per SUB Electric
standards. Placement of such facilities shall be in the proposed seven-foot frontage PUE and
shall be underground as conditioned in the Underground Placement of Utilities section below..
,
6. Prior to Final Plat approval, the applicant shall record and document a 10-foot private utility
easement on the east line of Parcl 2,
7, Prior to Final plat approval, all utility lines tq serve Parcels. 1 and 2 shall be placed
underground, '
8, Prior to Final Plat approval, Parcel 2 shall be serviced with a private water lateral from the
water main in the right-of-way east of the subject property and a water meter located as per
SUB Water standards. NOTE: Plumbing permits are required to install this private water lateral
9. Prior to Final Plat approval, the applicant shall enter into a maintenance agreement with the
City of Springfield for long term. maintenance of the public right-of-way area 'used for driveway
, ,
access,
10. Prior to Final Plat approval, the applicant shall obtain approval by the City Surveyor and record
all easements as shown on the plans.
8002008-00041
10
.
.'-' ';;.....'~.~:;-" -~:'\I'/...'- p-..jt.
11, Prior to final occupancy, all setback areas on Parcel 1 and 2 shall be landscaped in accordance
with SDC 4.4-105.
12, Prior to Final Plat approval, off-street parking shall be constructed in conformance with SDC
4,6-125.
13, Future development of Parcel 2 shall required a paved driveway
14, Vision clearance areas shall be maintained at each access to a 'public street as per SDC 4,2-
130.
CONCLUSION
The application, as submitted and conditioned herein, complies with the ten criteria listed in SDC 5,12-
125 A, through J, The tentative plan approved as submitted and conditioned herein may not be
substantively changed during the platting process without an approved modification application in
accordance with SDC 5,12-145,
WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE?
SDC 5.12-140 A. states that for partitions, a plat pre-submittal meeting shall be held within one year of
the tentative plan approval. Therefore, the applicant has up to one year from'the date of this decision
to meet SDC standards and the conditions of approval contained herein and to submit a plat application
for pre-submittal. SDC 5,12-140 A, also states that the applicant shall submit the mylars and
application fee within 180 days of the pre-submittal meeting, If, however, the applicant has not
submitted the plat application within these timeframes, the tentative plan approval shall become null
and void and re-submittal is required. Please refer to the plat application packet available at the
Development Services Department, as well as 5.12-135 through 5.12-150, for more detailed
information on the platting process,
Please note that the plat, as well as the installation of public and private improvements, must conform
to the approved tentative plan or as conditioned herein. In addition, please note that no individual
parcels may be transferred and no building permits will be issued until the plat has been recorded at
Lane County and the applicant has submitted five (5) recorded, rolled paper copies of the plat and three
(3) copies of required documents to the Development Services Department.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The application, all documents, and supporting evidence are available for free inspection (copies are
available for a fee) at the Development Services Department. .
,
APPEAL
This decision is considered a Director's Type II decision and as such, may be appealed to the
Planning Commission. SDC 5,3-115 states that only the property owner, applicant, if different, and
those persons who submitted written comments within the 14-day comment period have standing to
appeal this decision: SDC 5,3-115,also states that an appeal application in accordance with 5,3-100
, ,shall be filed with the Development Services Department within 15 calendar days of the Director's,
decision (the date of this decision). In accordance with this policy and the Oregon Rules of Civil
Procedures, Rule 10(c), the appeal period for this decision expires at 5:00pm on October 15, 2008,
QUESTIONS
Please call Lissa Davis in the Development Services Department Planning Division at 726-3632 or
email heratldavislalcLsorinafield.or.usif you have any questions.
SUB2008-00041
11
;"-<.-
'1'
,,'.
..
':-:..
",:-
,....'
~
,
.
I
;"',
, '5'0&- "',-~,..~,,",
" r, """"r ... f1;l.~ ,'," ..ft ",,'.t"f'~ 'lR~ 4#,.
-t ,,'. '" 11 ~ h ",,",""'~'f'" N''1,t.j>.;N ,..~\"iP1: ."f~\..,''1'",,'
, - \ 00; ,. .. .. ~":jJ;'f1 )"~ ~ 'tf.;<l" ...' I~'""" ,
, '..., ..::' ~ <' ~,v"-,~:I.,,','\ 'Li'i' ",~~ ; ~ . ," , {\~h\
. h ! _ ..J'<>;"i.\fa>' ii, '~~', "1.)-11' tr.. .tv,pt.
::>":.<~ITYQ~>SP~tf;JQ~IF~9;~j~ ..
DEVELOPMENT,SERVICES'DEPARTMENT'
, ",t' ','. ..'; ,". ,- . , .' _ ."~,,
, ".~,' 2255thiST:,; ;.-,
- '," ...,.' ,iI',", ""'" "
,SPRINGFIELD 'OR 97477":';.
,. " . " ',; '~,!:' :;' '~~,;':l\::r.t~:,JI;~t"r-
'.: ,~;, ,S,,;,\~._""~' 'Ni~'t;\'~', r'&,'::
, .".., ",' --. ' n
~, . '
,..1101
Gary P Cross
460 West 25th
Eugene, OR 97405
.
.
:
.j,
'~",:"..---,..,...~ ..._ ;.011.......
; "', . ".". .;:"~?,~~;.' "~::"1:;"':i~~;~';r',\~~~~~t~;
,CITY OF SPRiNGFIELD ,;\,t;if
" "", " , ' .. , " ,,,,,,,.., ,~,'
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMEN
- ."" :,;~: '," "2"25' 5't'h'S' T' '),f,.::;:~1'"',':~:::'~,~;
'1 '."., .- .- ....,' ~),' J .".;1. ...,
SPRINGFIEUi':OR 97477 ~f.~.~
\ ri!-. . . .l....":'.,;;'~
';',;'1( .,"'(
Marvin Krush
Krush and Associates
607 Hwy 99 North
Eugene, OR 97405
," D--,
,V,