HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication APPLICANT 12/30/2008
.'
City of Springfield Date ReceIved:
Development Services Department
225 Fifth Street DEe 30 2008
Springfield, OR 97477
Development Issues Meeting (DI~iginaISubmittal.
SPRINGFIELD
~.,
'. .
. . .
Prospective
Applicant Name: S <:.-" fr t/ 7~r-
Company: -t: 7-r,.I'1 LL/'~ p~
I~~dress: ,~O I .v>/ .s ,4,.t:-e-l:",.i:zc: {f:n:':';-2:Jd:;.,.;;t'TY?
I Prospective I
Applicant's Rep.: Phone:
ICompany: IFax: ·
I'.A.; d.d r. ess: ....~....;... ......._................;.. .........
~ ,," ~K/<0y!~ .." ::;7\81tC<.,'"'~1'Ei'I:\0U'J'%'..";'li. '-;c"_:;;n"':,,~;.:;q'lX01i~-'^-" '; -2?\'R$;.(};" ';:"'-"t21ij}";i,!;,,Em!f;_.',E~(V'iJ.q:'.:;:., ,"'"",_, ,~, ,,""', ',,"', , ~.- "
/)
v
9'11777
IASSESSOR'S MAP ~6: 17-o.Y~::2-0'Zl hAX LOT NO(S): 171-0;2. - -,ucro - OO{~
1 Property Address: frO / Lf:2 J 5~e:r /In '':J.h:.. c./ Or? 9 7 L-/ 77
l~ize of pro~~~tY~'N."""r ~O,"''- Acres ~ Sauare Feet D I
I Description of If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application. .
Proposal: .:J:...p Ol"L\.~."<-'" --\-,.., ~u.;\.J. CA. r.>____~ c;;.~~l""" '''- ~\.... M....~~L.~R".-<-.
1 . . .'1 r + ~ , ~;s;~" Sl.......St... Po,d.
EXlstmg Use: v <l. L ... ~ J"
1# of Lots/Parcels: IAV9' Lot/Parcel Size:
I ",,' .:...~,,).;;r"-~';<;.""';,)"':.:'7'" .';;. ,>",,,,,"',,,,X;d""~:"' ,;",>:::;1/-' _.,. .l,iV/J":&,,;: "P"
Phone: S"lfj- ?If/- S--2lf<.
IFax: S~I/- 7'-(/- S-.:l4 0
/7'1 77
"....>":;,~:ir .'VI, "',
i
1
1
I
1
1
I
I
sf Density.:
:"''''''~"',L'''''''
du/acre
Prospective
Applicant:
s;g.a,::!JA ~
S~ '" iT A- VY''''-
Date:
/0/-2cmR"
Print
~equi~~<d P-;1oject:Information - .~~~ -- (City-Intake Staff: complete thi~,~~ction)
Case No.: _~~-~'-
C-/
Application Fee: $ '52/ ,6"\,)
Date: 12-hc/o'?)
ITechnical Fee: $0'
Reviewed by: -f7YL-
I Postaqe Fee: $0
TOTAL FEES: $
c;"2-1 ,(l\)
'C;"!.w.'S2L~, .~:'::6M'?::t_.-,- -_:'."'~--" - '_~'\'f
PROJECT NUMBER: PRSzwg-ocor I
If-;":;:'- :,"Y;\~'",---
~'YFOL<d:. ~ I!:4F:..~~T ~,-':~~-"", ~",..r;"
Revised 1{1{08 Molly Markarian
1 of 3
.
Development Issues Meeting Submittal Requirements"\:hecklist
o Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee
calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development Services
Department. The applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the
time of complete application submittal.
o Development Issues Meeting Application Form
o Five (5) Questions - list specific questions the applicant would like staff to answer
during the meeting. So that each question may be fully evaluated, the list is limited to five
questions.
~en (10) Copies of the Proposed Plan - suggested information valuable for staff to
,review the proposal is listed below. It is not necessary to include all of these items on
the site or plot plan. However, applicants are encouraged to address as many as possible
given that the level of information that will be derived from the meeting is, commensurate
with the level of detail provided in the application. '
Applicants are also encouraged to include additional information on the plan as listed in
the Springfield Development Code (SDC) 5.12-120, Land Divisions ~ Partitions &
Subdivisions - Tentative Plan Submittal Requirements or 5.17-120, Site Plan Review
Submittal Requirements.
~ /Drawn in ink on quality paper no smaller than 11" x 17~'
Q" Scale appropriate to the area involved and sufficient to show detail of the plan and
related data, such as 1" = 30', 1" = 50' or 1" = 100'
Q/ North arrow
~
o
o
o
Date of preparation
Street address and assess-or's rii~p a'rid t!'l~ lot nl,Jrri6e?
Dimensions (in feet) and size (either square feet or acres) of the development area
Location and size of existing and proposed utilities, including connection points
On-site drainage collection system and flow patterns, the size and location of drain
lines and catch basins, dry wells, and natural drainageways to be retained
Area and dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for
common open spaces
DIMs Related to Land Divisions
o
o Approximate location, number and dimensions of proposed lots
o How streets in the proposal area connect with existing streets
DIMs Related to Site Plan Review
o
o
D
Proposed and existing buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area),
setbacks from property lines, distance between buildings, and height
Area and percentage of the site proposed for buildings, structurJ;}fl~~wa~~~ed:
sidewalks, patios and other impervious surfaces
Parking and circulation plan
DEe 3 0 2008
Original Submittal
Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian
3 of 3
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, Oregon 97477
541-726-3759 Phone
Ci._ ,f Springfield Official Receipt
Developmcnt Services Department
Public Works Department
RECEIPT #:
3200800000000000811
Date: 12/30/2008
2:56: 12PM
Job/Journal Number Description.
ZON2008-00042 CTY Development Issues Mtg
Paid By
WILLIAM T CROXEN -IP
Item Total:
Check Number Authorization
Received By Batch Number Number How Received
tj 052529 In Person
Payment Total:
Amount Due
521.00
$521.00
Payments:
Type of Payment
CreditCard
Amount Paid
$521.00
$521.00
,
Date Received:
DEe 3 0 2008
Original Submittal
cRcccintl
Page I of I
12/30/2008
INTt:RNATIONALef)PA~ER
801 42ND STREET
SPRINGFIELD, OREGON 97478
T 541-741-5243
F 541-741-5240
scott.unger2@cbpr.ipaper.com
December 30, 2008
New Water Utilitv Pumo Station
,International Paper is proposing to design and construct a new water utility pumping system
which will reliably provide water to the IP containerboard mill.
The system will utilize the recently constructed water intake and fish screen structure on the
bank of the McKenzie River. We are proposing to buiid a new pump station between the bank of
the McKenzie River and State Highway 126, The, pumps would discharge into a buried 36"
pipeline that would run underneath the Kaiser Slough Bridge and adjacent to the Kaiser Slough
for 2000' and ultimately discharge into our existing river pump intake structure, The pump
station would be powered through our own self-generating utility. The power sub-station would
be on IP property and has already been approved as part of our original site development plan
review. The pump conductors and control wiring would travel to the pumps via aerial lines over
the Kaiser Slough and then travel underground adjacent to the buried 36" forcemain pipe.
International Paper has received contingent approval from the following entities:
1) ODOT - Oregon Department of Transportation
2) COE - The US Army Corps of Engineers
3) SUB - Springfield Utility Board - granted approval for IP to power this facility with the IP
self-generating utility.
The basis of the proposal resides in the fact that this past summer IP was unable to complete a
microtunnel underneath the Kaiser Slough and State Highway 126, CH2M Hill has been
commissioned to evaluate the tunneling attempt and their results indicate thai it is possible to
complete the tunnel but at great risk, IP is inherently risk averse. The costs associated with
implementing risk control measures has compelled IP to seek other options, If IP is
unsuccessful in getting approval for this alternative pumping system configuration, IP will be
forced to pursue a tunneling solution which will include but not be limited to seeking permits to
perforrn additional geotechnical investigations and implement ground stabilization measures
along the tunnel horizon which passes underneath the Kaiser Slough and State Highway 126.
We request sincere consideration of this proposal and are looking to identify 'any such
constraints or design limitations, IP would like to complete this project by August 2009.
R::LUIlY,
scott~! cr-
Project Manager
International Paper
Date Received:
DEe 3 0 2008
Original Submittal
DIM - Questions
1) Considering the proposed water utility infrastructure would be built within 75 feet
of the McKenzie River, what, if any, architectural modifications would the City
impose to maintain the pristine nature of the McKenzie River? ,
2) Considering IP is proposing to build a water utility structure on land owned by the
State of Oregon (ODOT), what involvement is required by the State to effect
approval for this project by the City of Springfield?
3) International Paper recognizes the sensitive nature of working adjacent to the
bank of the Mckenzie River and Kaiser Slough, During construction IP will have
a comprehensive spill prevention and erosion control plan to ensure construction
materials will nQt enter the water ways, With the e'xception of the pump station
structure and aerial power lines, our pipeline and power conductors will be
underground and out of sight and the land restored to original condition, What, if
any, land drainage considerations does the City have for IP?
4) Given the fact that the proposed water utility infrastructure is industrial'in nature,
will be built from non-combustible materials, and will not be designed fot
, continuous human occupancy, what, if any, access, parking, fire suppression, and
lighting improvements would the city require?
5) What pennits will the City require International Paper to obtain to enable the
expeditious design, construction, and operation of the proposed water utilility?
Date Received:
DEe 3 0 2008
Original Submittal
,":I'
'"'-'
Un~er, Scott
,
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Dean, BennyA Jr NWP [BennyADean@usace.army,mil]
Wednesday,'December 17, 200812:17 PM
Unger, Scott
Leighton. Loren; Hayward. Ruth; Campbell, Kent
RE: Internatinoal Paper Project
Hi Scott,
Sounds like you now have the project sufficiently covered. If you have any further
questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me. Have a great afternoon,
Benny A. Dean Jr.
Regulatory Project Manager/Biologist
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Ph: (541)465,6769
Fax: (541)465,6888
-----Original ~essage----- t
From: Unger, Scott [mai1to:Scott,Unger2@cbpr,ipaper,com]
,Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2008 12:10 PM
To: Dean, Benny A Jr NWP
Cc: Leighton, Loren; Hayward, Ruth; Campbell, Kent
Subject: RE: Internatinoal Paper Project
Benny,
Thank you for the clarification. My current understanding is that a nCrossing" of the
Kaiser Slough will be regulated and if our conductor voltage is 480V, we will be required
to keep them at a minimum elevation of 35' above the OHWM. In addition, if we now chose
to aerial these lines across the slough, the placement of power poles below the OHWM would
trigger a "Consultation" which would bring NMFS, National Marine Fisheries Service, into
the review process. At this point IP will be required to submit all final design
documents for COE review. Upon COE review, a permit modification is the most likely
requirement but a new permit may be the only option.
Thank you for your time.
Regards,
Scott Unger
,,-.,Original Message",.,
From: Dean, Benny A Jr NWP [mailto:Benny.A.Dean@usace.army.mil)
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2008 10:17 AM
To: Unger, Scott
Cc: Leighton, Loren; Hayward, Ruth
Subject: Internatinoal Paper Project
Date Received:
DEe 3 0 2008
Hi Scott,
Original Submittal
Well I do have some clarification for you about details I mentioned I was not certain
about yesterday,
Number one is correct for waterways. Do keep in mind Section 404 jurisdiction may also
extend from the ordinary high water mark to the adjoining wetlands located along the
waterway.
I have looked up Kaiser Slough in our guidance on Section 10 waterways, I did not find
the slough, however in looking through our regulations and found the lateral extent of our
Section 10 jurisdiction extends with the ordinary high water mark into the slough since
the slough does affect the course/capacity of the navigable waterway, Also previous
determinations have reflected the slough has been.regulated as Section 10 in the past.
Therefore the pilings to hold up the concrete conduit for the electrical lines is
1
regulated. And there are height requirements for how high the electrical lines must be
over the waterway. Here is the measurement from the top of the ordinary high water mark
as it follows:
Nominal System Voltage, kV
115 and below
138
161
230
350
500
700
750,765
Minimum Additional Clearance (ft,)
Above Clearance Required for Bridges
20
22
24
26
30
35
42
45
So if you run a 480 volt line to the pumps, the line crossing over the slough must be 35
feet above the ordinary high water mark. In comparison to the cost of shooting concrete
to drill through, I still think this is a bit cheaper,
And since the Kaiser Slough is a Section 10 waterway, all crossings wou19 be regulated
since it may adversely affect navigation. So regardless of where the pier supports are
for the electrical conduit, the project would be regulated.
Pipelines in section 404 waters are considered structures unless they are of such a large
size that it has the effect of fill (an example is 10 foot diameter pipe would be
considered fill due to the size and associated impacts). A smaller pipe such as the '.
temporary pipes that have been placed would not have the effect of fill in a Section 404
water, however in a Section 10 waterway it is regulated due to the course and capacity
could be altered. And at., this po~nt since Kaiser Slough is a Section 10 water, a permit
or permit modification would be necessary for the proposed project.
And upon International Paper acquiring all of the necessary approvals, the Corps
understands all materials will be submitted' for our review.
Be sure in the application revision request to
to listed species when placing the pilings (if
isolating .the worksite,. etc. . .
outline measures taken to minimize impacts
in the waterway), such as silt screens,
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Have a great afternoon,
Benny A. Dean Jr.
Regulatory Project Manager/Biologist
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Ph: (541) 465,6769
Fax: (541)465-6888
-----Original Message-----
from: Unger, Scott [mailto:Scott.Unger2@cbpr.ipaper.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2008 9:20 AM
To: Dean, Benny A Jr NWP
Cc: Leighton, Loren: Hayward, Ruth
Subject:
Date Received:
DEe 3 0 2008
Hello Benny,
Original Submittal
Thank you for your time yesterday,
In summary of our meeting IP has the following understanding.
1) The extent of COE jurisdiction is the Ordinary High Water Mark: defined as the 1yr/2yr
flood level,
2) The Kaiser Slough is not a Section 10 ( Navigable) waterway.
3) Our proposed method for supplying power to the pumps which includes a pre,stressed
concrete beam spanning the slough is allowed given the following qualifications.
2
a) If the piers that support the beam are outside the OHWM, then no permit or
additional evaluation is necessary by COE.
b) If the piers that support the beam are inside the OHWM, then additional
evaluation by COE is necessary, a permit may be required, and the
extent of necessary pilings and structllre might be classified as "Fill"
material.. .which may then trigger. an additional review or evaluation.
4) Pipelines are classified as "structure".
5) Upon approval of the project by all vested parties, IP will submit final design
documents to the COE,
Please provide written acknowledgement in the form of a letter or a response to this e-
mail confirming your agreement with the above statements.
Regards,
Scott Unger
Engineering
International Paper
541-912'0370
Date Received:
DEe 3 0 2008
Original Submittal
3
Message
.
Page 1 of 3
Unger, Scott
From: HEYN Alfred H' AI [AI.H.HEYN@odot.state,or.usj
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 2:44 PM
To: Unger, Scott
Cc: KETCH Aaron J
Subject: RE: Pump Station PDF's
Scott,
, -
,I do not beJfeve that the embankment is actually_structural fill, but if you are approximately 20-
25 feet away from the bridge then it will be okay, Tlie bridge is supported on driven piling and
so there is no risk to the bridge of the foundation being undermined or losing support so I have
no-problem witli what you have proposed with regards to the bridge structure. '
AI Heyn, P.E.
Sr. Structural Design Engineer
ODOT.Aegion 2 Bridge/Geo-Hydro
455 Airport Rd, SE, Bldg, A
Salem, OR 97301-5397
Phone: 503-986-2774
Fax: 503-986.2622
al. h.heyn@odot.stale.or.us
From: Unger, Scott [mailto:Scott.Unger2@cbpr.ipaper,com]
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 10:34 AM
To: HEYN Alfred H * AI
Subject: FW: Pump Station PDF's
HiAI,
I appreciate your quick response.
Your requests will be easy to handle,
An additional question I have is once the pipeline exits from underneath the bridge going South, we are going to
need to hug the burm to stay above the ordinary high water mark. We have to keep our excavation above
elevation 472', The will require us to work within 25' of the bridge structure and dig into what is possibly structural
fill. What are the limitations in this case? One idea we have to to cut a 6'-8' path along the slope, shore up the
downside with a line of concrete geoblocks, dig a shallow trench, bed and drop in the pipe and cover with
compacted dirt or CDF, Thoughts?
Regards,
Scott
.1
From: KETCH Aaron J [mailto:Aaron.J.KETCH@odot.state.or.us]
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 8:54 AM
To: Unger, Scott
Subject: FW: Pump Station PDF's
Date Received:
DEe 3 0 2008
Original Submittal
12/29/2008
Message
$
Page 2 of 3
Here is AI heyns remarks for the pipe and his contact number and info,
-----Original Message-----
From: HEYN Alfred H * AI
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 20088:24 AM
To: KETCH Aaron J
Subject: RE: Pump Station PDF's
Aaron,
The installation shown looks pretty straightforward. Please have Scott Unger do the following:
. Stay away from the bridge interior bent (pillars) by at least 5 feet with all excavation work.
. Replace the riprap that is removed and put it back over the excavation or use controlled
density fill (CDF) to match the existing slope and not placed closer than 5 feet to the
bridge interior bent (pillars).
. headroom will be limited for equipment below the bridge, so may need to use special
equipment for the excavation work or possilbly some hand digging, Field verify the
vertical headroom distance to make sure, Do not impact the bridge superstructure with
any construction equipment.
Thanks,
AI Heyn, P,E.
Sr, Structural Design Engineer
ObOT Region 2 Bridge/Geo-Hydro
, 455 Airport Rd, SE, Bldg, A
Salem, OR 97301-5397
Phone: 503-986-2774
Fax: 503-986-2622
al.h.heyn@odol.slate.or.us
From: KETCH Aaron J
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2008 3:S3 PM
To: HEYN Alfred H * AI
Subject: FW: Pump Station PDF's
I know that you do not have anything to do with pages 1 &2 but page 3 is where I need your advice. Structure # is
09563E on hwy 227 mp 8.20
-----Original Message-----
From: Unger, Scott [mailto:Scott.Unger2@cbpr.ipaper.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2008 3:3S PM
To: KETCH Aaron J Date Received:
Subject: Pump Station PDF's
Aaron,
The pump station drawings are attached,
DEe 3 0 2008
Thanks for your time today,
Original Submittal
It has been determined by the COE that we cannot span a concrete conduit support beam across the siough.
Due to waterway regulations, we must keep our conductors a minimum of 35' above the water level.
12/29/2008
Message
.
Page 3 of 3
Consequently, we will be aerieling the power lines across the slough via power poles, Power pole placement is
flexible except that they must be placed outside the ordinary high water mark of 472',
Please forward me the State engineers contact information,
Regards,
Scott Unger
Engineering
International Paper
541-912-0370
12/29/2008
Date Received:
DEe 3 0 2008
Original Submittal
.
~
Unger, Scott
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
SPAETH Michael A [MichaeIASPAETH@odot.state,or.us]
Tuesday, December 30,20089:41 AM
Unger, Scott
KETCH Aaron J
RE: Pump Station
Hello Scot t,
I am in agreement of the coptingencies as "listed, once .add~ess will lead to an approved
ODOT permit,
Mike Spaeth
ODOT District 5 Manager
-----Original Message-----
From: Unger, Scott [mailto:Scott,Unger2@cbpr.ipaper,com]
Sent: Monday, December 29, 2008 1:56 PM
,To: SPAETH Michael A
Cc: KETCH Aaron J
Subject: Pump Station
Hello Mike,
Thank you for your time December 17, 2008 where we met to discuss the IP proposal to build
a pump station at the Kaiser Slough Point, IP proposes to build a Pump Station at the
Kaiser Slough Point. The Pump Station would be built on ODOT land and the 36" Forcemain
pipeline would travel underground underneath the State Highway 126 bridge that crosses the
Kaiser Slough. The pipeline would then cross over onto IP land and continue to our main
pumping station.
The following is a summary of our meeting where we discussed the conceptual drawings.
ODOT( Oregon Department of Transportation) has granted contingent approval to IP
(International Paper) to build and operate the "Proposed Pump Station II at the Kaiser
Slough Point,
The contingencies are:
AI That the Final Design of the Pump Station does not materially differ from the proposed
"concept" drawings.
B) That the Final Design of the 36" Forcemain pipeline be approved by. and built within any
criteria stipulated by the.appointed State of Oregon Bridge Engineer.
Al Heyn, P,E,
Sr. Structural Design Engineer
ODOT Region 2 Bridge/Geo'Hydro
455 Airport Rd, SE, Bldg, A
Salem, OR 97301,5397
Phone: 503,986,2774
Fax: 503,986,2622
al.h,heyn@odot,state,or.us
C) That a long term lease agreement can be agreed upon by both parties,
Please respond to this e-mail to confirm your agreement and or to make any corrections or
clarifications.
Regards,
Scott Unger
Project Manager
Engineering
Date Received:
DEe 3 0 2008
1
Original Submittal
'iW
International Paper
Springfield, Oregon
541'912,0370
Scott.unger2@cbpr,ipaper com
Date Received:
DEe 3 0 2008
, Original SubmittaL
2
I
.'
,1
~
50" x 40"
12.5 sq. ft.
~
~
u
r
~
40" x 30"
8.3 sq. ft.
,.,.~
55" x 35"
12.4 sq. ft.
60" x 41"
14.75 sq. ft.
.~
",,' .
~
46" x 38"
9.39 sq. ft.
50"wx46"
15.5 sq. ft.
.'(1~
~
j",
., ,
'''-' ,/
, .-'i-
t" ............., ':.-:
:,1'"
2JWil
Efate1TeeOI'J9G1:
58"wx46"
10.5 sq. ft.
t
fIlP ~
-
-""
58" x 46"
8 sq.ft.
, . ~ . ,': :.. . ''f':'~~;<
r . . .,;~'f' J....-.~ .. /.~_
.... -, 'I'. ~ &....-
- '.., ,~"........_-,<",.:
.' ~ '. "#"., . -:'~
. ;, .. \::": ..:J . . -t~
.. ~J. .-. _.,.o.~ ....
~~
,
,..~
~
41" x 50"
12.3 sq. ft.
~
44" x 34"
6.9 sq. ft.
Date Received:
DEe 3 0 2008
Original suomittal-
54" x 36"
11.8 sq. ft.
<.
:1
..:~
EflP m
, '\I -- :r-" , jJ
j, - ~' - ,.r,'
~....\~;>-:~\ ", J..
I,....., ~,~ .
I ". , ' , , . .'
55" x 35"
11.8 sq. ft.
~,
l-
ffP21ill;J
57" x 35"
12.3 sq.ft.
- ..........:.....-
r
,
fJlfJm
,.,~
..'
40" w x48"
12.3 sq.ft.
'~
. /,?
>.'~ ff.
'\ ":.l7j1'~<'"~.,,~
. .)'l;;.
, . : I ~ ,'....
\ -.....-
.1 ~ \ ........
J ..':.,
)"" ....
I
I
j
l
"
P: 314.524-2040
..~
47" x 95"
31 sq. ft.
fX1JJ ~
78" x 96"
43 sq.ft.
-
D.~
52" x 86"
22.5 sq. ft.
"
,~
~-
}J t .
.
..
~
~....
}
Date Received:
DEe 3 0 2008
Original SUbmlltal_
^
P: 314-524-2040
iSESSMENT
TAXATION
)NLY
SEC. 29 T.17S. R . W.M.
LANE COUNlY
SCAtE I' _ 400'
SEEIU.P170220
.' -
..,J;.'",:,:;;':;::'
.:"1
~
-~
~ .:' 800' c~...
..L.LOT<-'.t:-......~.~::.~
-,7.."'.'>1)-,..""7--1(--____ .
,
"
SEEl.IM> 17'02-29-1-2
'1
~
,
,
,
,
,
,
11
O~9~O~ 1
,
'\ ' :
- ,~----'~'~--r--- ,;~--,,~
'.,--......1... I
I
,
,
"
: /". ~
J :
_.!.'';:''!f'::'>L_ "
- .~- I =:;:
,
000010"
,
,
LOT"
n.'"
LOT I~
II."
-:;":_f'~...~
'I /........
2'303 =0,
17900>l:.Alf"
PCI,.' J?t,.- LOG POND
'IJ,@@'iJ; O~9~O
~.."" i
, / '0-
f _I6DQTm?_~_~2!~ ".
.,..,.,..,..' .u;:~1702 J2 J3
,
,
,
,
-----..-..:......-----,-;.-.;;:";~;;;,_;;-{;i;;_.;;J---... .
SEElAAP1702J2
--".
.4
17'02 29
NAD 83/91
~
,-
,~,
,,~
,~
'*
,~,
,~
,~
,~
,~
,,~
,~
,~
-
,,~
2\01
".
,,~
,~
,,~
,~,
,~
=
,~
,.,
,.,
,~
~,
*
~,
~
.~
~
"
a
c
~
~
Date Received:
Original SUbmittai_.___
DEe 3 0 lU08
17 02 29
LAFLEUR Karen
Subject:
Location:
ZON2008-00042 De\(elopment Issues Mtg (Int Paper) Andy
_SP _ConfRm616
Thu 1/15/2009 1:30 PM
Thu 1/15/20092:30 PM
Start:
End:
Recurrence:
(none)
Meeting Status:
Required Attendees:
Meeling organizer
Resources:
L1MBIRD Andrew; DRISCOLL JON; Krueger Kristi; MCEACHERN Clayton; PERRY Richard;
STOUDER Matt; Walter Eric; Lynn Detering (Iynn.detering@odot.state.or.us); PUENT David;
WALKER George; GOTTFRIED Charles; DRISCOLL Jon; GORDON Gilbert
_SP _ConfRm616 '
A Development Issues Meeting has been scheduled for Thursday, January 15, 2009 @ 1.:30 - 2:30 p.m. in
DSD 616. The planner assigned to this application is Andy Limbird. The applicant submitted plans to discuss
construct of a new water utility pumping system to provide water to the International Paper containerboard mill.
The new pump station would be located between the bank of the McKenzie River and State Highway
126/Kaiser Slough Bridge area. Please confirm your attendance at this meeting.
,
\;
Date Received:
DEe 3 0 2008
Original Submittal
1
. ,
f;+' ~.ti '1
?o~<"
~~ 'i'-.t-- '}
KIZER SLOUGH
,.10'
.24'
Date Received:
DEe 3 0 2008
Original Submittal
'-\/~
EL. 482 - 500
EL. 480 :: YEAR
EL ~ :: 600 YEAR
EL, 468 : ri'?ISNARY HIGH WATER
EL, 464 = DESIGUNMMER WATER
LOW WATER
PUMP HOUSE
WITH WET
WEll BELOW
\
\
\
\
\
\
)..to f ~
-
.,7'"
OPTION "G"
fHIS LOCATIO
OF BANK. N IS g':!; FROM TOP
THE 60" 0 HEADER
TO THE END OF THPEIPE IS CONNECTED
PIPE. EXISTING 60"0
~
......
BRESHEARSITHOR I....I'!
HOGINEER'r;(; NTON
~126e .;"yg9E. PO 3T COOlSUlT..,.rs U1
Fa~'(~~3";:=OO2 Ph(~16~'3<
PRELIMINARY
~NA.TIONAI... PAPER
PUMP NGFlELD, OREGON
ICtUo 1/0"."-</'..... HOUSE AREA PLAN
~fIf; _ oon: 1--
"'" ,- ,- -.'
PLOT ',.".... 1- 0 08. 706-'P 1 p,
."" W>>/>X """ 'SOWJj"'" ...
CADNQ: oe---~ _ IN'TE:R1AnoNAl.. -.
,~1 lILLWIlIDI -
~101 _...--::::-'
0M00IC,"47t
GMJ owe .
- DO NOT EDIT MANl>>J.LY
\
\
1~'_4'
AIR COIolPRESSOR
ROO"
I ~
il\
4- _ubI--
I '1m n.
i .in,
---t;::' - - - .
I .~~.
ru
I
l::::'~': .::: : .
I'~~~..
~mn+_m:r-- _no -
"'''T''''-
I
!
I
II
!.
~
i
,
I
iT
'z,
'-I
:;1
:0.
i~ I
,0 ,
:~ I
'.
:",. ,
'..::1 i
;0
14"_0"
111"_0'
"AN
DETAIL
SCALE: 1/4"."-'-
C6
,
,
>
~
,
~
"
~
~
SHEET I.lETAl ROOF WIlli
WITH 4/12 ROOf SlOPE
ROOF FRAMING AND CONDUIT
RACK SlJPPORT FRAJ.lING
o PRECAST PANEl--.......
ff Ct.lU (OPTION) ......
STAIRS rnIS AREA (NOT SHOWN) \
\1
311. FORCED J.lAIN
c
,
"
!
1
36'. PIPE (5) PlACESJ\'
FlOWAIllE fILl--, i
/ '
1
,
I
-.j--
,
PIPE BEDDING
~ROOF H.6.TCH ...T EACH PlIMP
(~
I
,
1
i
!
~
:...L
cb
I '.-. ({;-;)t~
, I
I '
, 1
(+, '" i
\J..) I
I i
,
'58 I
I
I,
"1
,
<OJ ,
L-j
r
SECTION THRU PUMP HOUSE
~~~~-.1'-'- ~
.
,
"
.
,
~
482 (500 YEAR FlOOO)
48~ (lH 'T{AR FlOOD)
c
,
"
477:i: rIN GRADE
-;:.;' · t'"!!~ ',,"," ;A..- ( . ( ;,
, " ...~.'-\~ _).\C{nr'\;"-" -- ~-
, ~: ,\ .~'0;:/'~) '~'Y()>.'~.. .,t-rjt.'J, ~,
1P"~J1,.<F;,..q>'B', ~'t'
::fl~l~:~.s:~4t, .,_" :y,~{ G': ~ \
. -~-'''0"'I.r't.- ;" ,__>- "i 1\,. ~? r..: ~...
.. -~i~~~')~',~{_: . X'l -r \.
.,,-'{ )'
!--I..~
.
,
"
~
~
fJ_ 459'-6'
l
PRELIMINARY
Y0~7
C'
1'1
Jt~:~ ~:"'""";"'''
"r"..' ,;':
:--'>' ...
)j! ':
_1<
...-~.
Date Received:
DEe 3 0 2008
Original Submittal
IMoJ IIE'o'aOIl 11)AK1~
BRESHEARSITHORNTON
ENO....EEIlINOC~SUlTNHS.l..
11lMH..,~~,PO 310,""""",01197002 Pll{5(U167$-l<1:>o
F.'1503)6~
INTERNATIONAL PN>ER
SPRINGF1ElD. OREGON
PUMP HOUSE PlAN AND SECTION
=;n:.rr~ ''::'j -~ I ill
CiiCiiib. D08108-IP .....
m.'....... SHm'JlO7
P\.DT IW[: QDI" INTER .lAne 1-I.&M:Jl -
_ lA.l.MlDtIlft'O'
CAD DWG - DO NOT EDIT IrL'.NUALlY CAD NO: Oll7O&-jp-(107....p, ~I _ IT. ~ ~ t'14~
. .
. .
I I I I
, i i i i
......-"-'--u--.-"-u-..-.--"-u1-.-'--"-,.-..-.--"-"-",.---.-..-"-,.-..-.,--.-"-----'-1.-"-'.-..--'-"-"-'--"1:--"-"--'----'--'--"-"-'--'--
, -r -- 1 --'--'----'---...--+--.....------ i
'I ~ u_u_u t~."ICH..iiR'OO'.,i...--.-u-.._u-h-..-..l1-~-n-u-u--.- \X r
I ~ \llAlDl I..EIIEL ' I . >.Y
"''''_u____ ,_u_u_u_u_u__.__,-,l I "_"_.._n_U_"_"_U_ j "_h_no 1.__.._..____.._u_.._.._.._n_.._
- I T L. I
+ ~ i t
-"'..'-u--.-"-..-u-u-..----"----t"-,--..--.-"-"--.-..-,- '--.--- .--t,-,.----,:::..--,--,--u-h-t.,--.-..-..-,,-,,-,,-..-u-.._.....
i i i i
i i i i
, SECTION (C'\, ,
1 I ~\ftr-r-.,. ~ I I
~1Jf__________
.'
l
~
~'
I
DETAJl
SCNJO
2 ~, mcmIc:....
ITS%'4
IlEl.OW Gll.<<.
CUlFROlolPlPE
C()f(IH()L DOISITY rILL NlOUNO
PtPEOIlREPLla:EX.RIPlW>
36'"'PIF'E
c5~fHD
I
Date Received:
DEe 3 0 2008
~
~
~
~
~
~
'''1__' p-I~ ~
NJ IllWIOIl rllol.1f:.,. ~
BRESHEARSITHORNTON ~
!;.f<af<l;.EIl.It<lCOOWll.>.NTS,lOl ~
l'ltieH..y99E,PQHO_..........OR91I)OlPt,~)61&-.lU4 [I'
F"ISOJIG7~ ~
HT'ER*llONAl. PN'ER go
SPRlNGFlfl.O, OREGON 13
_ WATER fW,y SECTlON A: DUAL _ ~
::t"!! iji- D~;'-" Iii. ;
Ta.tE: G2:.X>>'Y ,-. ... SHEET 004 ~
PI..OT o.o.TE: 12/O1~ 1= l~.... ~APER ~
CAONO: ~.olDI!Ii.QNIU......_ Q
Original submittal
PRELIMINARY
CAD OWG - 00 NOT EOfT MANUAl.l..Y
I-~'
J
...
-~-:; L-.!
~
~
I
"I _1__ ^
i-' ". .,. I_~ -/ "::.
C~ IrJirl IT::::= - -t"
Wrrt'~t~ .~ ~- ~ ~J ~ _
~Ir-
I.J!:
""';
~:~xy~,^..~.
:~ XX 1\\
, X X X~yYy~
X XXXV<.fXX
i'<' 1
~ 'X
\X X X >(' X,
~~ X; c'
'" MXYYx.!
~),'{XI '. [_
:J I- IT
1-'1l
~~
,
'-
~u "it -.
~t-f:f y I ~
Lj:: f:j l!
L f~ r--II\
6:: t=f-
-, f-- :=
III- -
'~~-r 1~t3
~/ b h n=:U!
/ ~IDJ ~
~ j~ ,1' ii
?;:=]) " 11:1'':J
-=::J:::
. ). \.' 'I
i\=f r, r;0t' r
I;'>., . ( _I
. r~
"1Jii3~ l
~~lJJ
f.L
I
,
~
Fr II
'"
-n
""
.,j illl'" ill]
I Ii
;jll" I' ....
H+ H. .1.(-'1/
w,s-~tfr :
I
" "
hll
c"
'J 1,)
1111 'II'
1111111)",(\11'
, I I IJY A P""
~_ \ -J I r r,""L
I ,(I II:: ~.
i I! II I :::
=
;
t!, ~. IF
rr/I 1(, - -I!:!L
lft' \I!~=j
,If ;::
LL' ,rn
ffi: ill I
~~~'
;-
17h..LII'
/lfrll
=\.
~
\
~
----
... --
'.
/
, . ~
! "
...--... ~ ='
c:~ 11
,
, ,,\
!
i
".. ...,..",..",
,~J '.-...!l'"
'"
u ~1
,
?
- --
,
~
,
~~
~\
...~.. .f'!..
L ~ ~ ,
~ ~
-f
17
j
v
~
~~
.y C
c1
.
-
1,
,
, ,
~l ~
= r
i3~
r~ ~~~
I' H
19;b:1 t:iJ~ YJ:),= IJ' ''''''ST ~A f
I rrR +H:=
V!z ..n
" ':!:' '~._j / ...'c I
11-'\11'1-'11'1' ~
" IlIfllj~.1 / / ~'
m13H',1 E:B.,:JY. "..hi;:::
ITR .,.tW/-.{ IlrUt''+-! I
tlH3~,tv A F'i
~ ~h,\\I"JI',.V --.
"'ttff'ilJ IE F.",,!, Efh:='>
- I
'df:!UJ_
1= H II IIffIR I LI II 1fJ.Cr " _
,= 'T::J{i',J./ 1/
'- III '[]fCi;~'1'i
~ a::g n - "'~III\!::i i
~I~~~; ~'L..u I II ._
-=E- -,- rl -..
.-= =~ '~~ .L_
1= i: ==
11= _ Jj-::J _ ~
i
.
I.~
.\~
Ln ~
~~I
.'t.Zi;~' ~~~"''''':}';''''~'''-'~~''~'''7:':~''''~'
I
, II'
!':YO...... -i
\
..
,
[
r \'
\ J-l,
l~ j
J F11'" l
- ~=::rIr
.,
o
ij'
5'
!!!..
(h 1:7
6- ~.
;L;___~
6t =
r ~
,.4-,,-
!
:i?
iil
':no
0)
fJ
~.
Ie.
I"
rl
I
I
J
--A
,
,
I
,
,
r7
"
r-;
"
J
~~
*-:-
I
.
t
!
\ --~ - '"i~", .'.
~tfJ
_ _ _ !lIIl
'\
Z rri'J ~~
~\::r~~?JP
~ ~(:(y
frvr
~
AJNk{
. :t:~
Date Received: .
DEe 3 0 2008
Original Submittal
~"
FOR ASSESSMENT
AND TAXATION
ONLY
SEC.
29 T.17S. R.2W. W.M.
LANE COUNTY
SCALE I" - .00'
SEE MAP 17 02 20
~', 't.";-:-wz'I:&'m\""" ,~?0: I
00.U1, '^~J"" - .c..,..
~"'~jf .....-...,.."......., '..''''----l
=-= L' ..../~I" :~,
'::::::: -, ",,' 'Il>~
0]9-00
o
19
-.
~o~".
. 600
-l- _ r.."_~~,1:.".....--,.~o<..,
- .h.O.!....~2:.7~__/r-_...!.f!!"'!.-_
(.-"...._" .F-I/'" 'T
,
/ ",~..........I
O-<T~
-.
-'
I
'-'-'#0>
-I
il
-::;..... 700
"::'-w-
",u.._u~~
-U'.,u
SEE I.olAP 17-02-29-1-2
019-01
::-/....../'f/.
'l
"
I'
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
,
!,
"
"
,
I
,
'\ ; :
-~.J--I--+--~1
...____........ I
I
I
I
!I
...- .- ~l
....... ~I
~..-.. / ,
.~ I
1--"') II
_ _ ~/'~~:4'~~ _ _ :::;:\_
- ,r...'" t -r
I
I
0000100
I
LOT II
39.80
019=01
!1c
::>
w
w
en
LOT 13
21.91
~
,'\
.'
0'-
~'ii E:.!:.'~'._.i__
I ~- 1l'K:-_.
.. 'I' ~ 'I'''''''''''' __........ '
' r'fi:J#'. t .no.., ~ ...;;;-....... l
~ -- } ..., , -~ '.r_'. 0 () n 0 0 0 0 .
...-----...- , .... '.. '....... ~-. 00 ,
'." /~G!':'" .'
" Ij'rr=___ , I
/ ~,~ ~4\...:-............ ~~,
...."... r ,-, ,,'0 .....0
-'. ........~ ~
/0"'---.....
oJ _.
>-...
~....
0_"'<:-0<
_",u ""
.....,.,,'"
2903
179.00 AC.
peL1
POND
"""rgf(f"
"lJ;.0S.0
SEE MAP 17 02 32
17 02 29
NAD 83/91
CANCEu.ED
1000
1001
1100
1200
1Joe
1501
1502
1503
1505
1600
1700
1600
'.00
2000
2100
2101
2102
210J
2200
2J<l0
2J<l1
2400
2500
2600
2601
2602
2700
2801
Joe
'0'
J<l2
.00
500
.,
OJ
OJ
o
,...
~
w
w
V>
Date Received:
DEe 3 0 2008
Original SUbmittal
17 02 29