The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutNotice PLANNER 6/19/2008 : '11~ IL- RECEIVED AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE . JUN 192008 By:T)M~1J ~ STATE OF OREGON) )ss. County of Lane ) I, Karen LaFleur, being first duly sworn, do hereby depose and say as follows:. 1. I state that I am a Program Technician for the Planning Division of the Development Services Department, City of Springfield, Oregon. 2. I state that in my capac;ity as, Pro{!ralp Technician, I prepared and caused to be / mailed copies of ~H'-,.(',. "B tJ~/I'-"/~ - Dfl.e200?-CJC!033 - DLUP/ p.lQ.(L/JL~ - (See attachment nAn) on ~/19 _,2008 addressed to (see 1'~ Attachment Bn), by causing said letters to be placed in a U.S. mail box with postage fully prepaid .thereon. s';fl))tA ~fL~ ~JN LaFLEUIR /) t STATE OF OREGON, County of Lane ~1J't.L Jq .2008. Personally appeared the above named Karen LaFleur, ~ram Technician, who acknowledged the foregoing inst~ument to be their voluntary act. Before me: .. . ~ ~ OFFICIAL SEAL DeVETTE KELL V NOTARY PUBLIC. OREGON COMMISSION NO. 420351 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES AUG. 15. 2011 : /\""iIL~ ~ u i? 115/// . f My Commission Expires: .i" Notice of Decision -Drinking Water Protection Overlay Project Name: Pathology Consultants Project Proposal: Tenant improvement for a medical laboratory. Case Number: DRC2008-00033 Project Location: 123 International Way Base Zone: Campus Industrial 'Overlay District(s): Drinking Water Protection Overlay (1-5 yr TOTZ) Application Submitted Date: May 12, 2008 Decision Issued Date: June 18, 2008 City Staff: Steve Hopkins Owner: Phil Farrington, PeaceHealth, 123 International Way, Springfield OR 97477 . Applicant: Joyce Siamon, Pathology Consultants PC, 755 E 11th Ave, Eugene OR 97401 Representative: Matt Matthews, TBG Architects and Planners, Inc. 132 East Broadway, Suite 200, Eugene OR 97401. Review Process:'This application is reviewed under Type I procedures listed in SDC 5.1-125, and the Drinking Water Protection Overlay regulations in SDC 3.3-200. SDC 3.3-235 (B): 1-5 YEARTOTZ STANDARDS FORAPPROV AL 1) The storage, handling, treatment, use, application, or production or otherwise keeping on premises of more than 20 gallons of hazardous materials that pose a risk to groundwater in aggregate quantities not containing DNAPLs shall be allowed only upon complianc'e with containment and safety standards set by the most recent Fire Code adopted by the City. Finding: The property lies within the 1-5 year Time of Travel Zone to the Sports Way wellhead. In accordance with SDC 3.3-220 C(3), the property will be governed by the standards of the 1-5 year TOTZ. Finding: The HMMP submitted with the application adequately addresses product and container labeling, provision of spill kits, spill prevention, and spill clean-up procedures. 2) Unless exempted, all hazardous materials that pose a risk to groundwater shall be stored in areas with approved secondary containment in place (Uniform Fire Code Articles 2 and 8003.1.3.3) Finding: Section 5.1 of the applicant's HMMP adequately addresses the secondary containment requirement. Hazardous materials in storage will be stored in hazardous mat~rials cabinets or commercial, plastic secondary containment devices (as dictated by NFP A hazardous materials storage rules). The secondary containment in the cabinets or cOIIlII!ercial plastic devices will include adequate volume to ensure 110% of the volume in Pathology Consuhants Case No, DRClOOB-00033 the largest container. Hazardous materials in use in the laboratory will be contained by sealing the laboratory floor according to the specifications described in the HMMP and by the secondary containment floor plan submitted to the SUB Water Quality Protection Coordinator on June 11, 2008 by Matt Matthews of TBG Architects. 3) All new use of DNAPLs are prohibited. Finding: The HMIS submitted with the original application included three DNAPL- . containing products: (1) KrystaIon, Toluene 56.3% Butyl Benzyl PhthlIate 7% (DNAPL is butyl benzyl phthalate); (2) Toxi-tubes A; and (3) Toxi-tubes B. Thes" products were removed from an updated HMIS submitted to the SUB Water Quali~, Protection Coordinator over e-mail on June 12, 2008, by Ken Taylor of KTA asscciates. None of the other products on the updated HMIS were found to contain DNAPL;. Finding: To prevent reintroduction to the inventory, it is important to maintain a current list of all DNAPL products that have been reviewed and/ or eliminated from the HMIS. Finding: Procedure 2 in Annex C of the HMMP outlines a HazardmlH Material Review Procedure designed to evaluate new chemicals for DNAPLs before they are purchased. Conditions of Approval: 1. Chemicals used/ stored on-site must be consistent with those .listed on the HMIS submitted on June 12, 2008. 2. On an annual basis, provide SUB with an updated HMIS that highlights all products added since the last submittal. 3. Maintain a .current list of all DNAPL products that have been reviewed and/ or eliminated from the HMIS. Include the product name, manufacturer, and DNAPL components. The log should include Krytalon, Toxi-Tube A, ;md Toxi-Tube B. For procedure 2 of Annex C of the HMMP, include a sample of th~ log that includes these three products. , 4. Prior to occupancy, an inspection to verify physical aspects and processes of the site is required. Please contact Amy Chinitz at 744-3745 to schedule this inspection. 4) Any change in the type of use or an increase in the maximum daily inventory quantity of any DNAPL is considered a new use and is prohibited. See Section (3) above. 5) The following certain types of facilities or changes in chemical use and/or storage of hazardous materials that pose a risk to groundwater are prohibited': a. Hazardous material product pipelines used to transport the hazaJ:dousmaterial off of the tax lot where it is produced or used; b. Injection wells, except dry wells for roof drainage; c. Solid waste landfills and transfer stations; d. Fill materials containing hazardous,materials; . Pathology Cansuhants Case No. DRClOOB-00033 2 e. Land uses and new facilities that will use, store, treat, handle, and/ or produce DNAPLs. Finding: The applicant has not proposed any of these activities. 6) Requirements found in Uniform Fire Code Appendix II-E Section 3.2.6 for a monitoring program and in 8003.1.3.3 for monitoring methods to detect hazardous materials in the secondary containment system shall be met for all amounts of hazardous materials that pose a risk to groundwater unless exempted. Findings: Section 11.0 of the HMMP describes the facility's policy for monitoring secondary containment areas. 7) Requirements found in Uniform Fire Code Appendix II-E Section 3.2.7 for inspection and record keeping procedures for monthly in-house inspection and maintenance of containment and emergency equipment for all amounts of hazardous materials that pose a risk to groundwater shall be met.unless exempted. Finding: Sections 11.0 and 12.0 of the HMMP describe the facility's policy for inspection and record keeping procedures. Finding: The HMMP follows the standard procedure for notification of a hazardous material release in Spiingfield, to call 911, which dispatches information to SUB. Following this procedure is important because SUB needs to be notified as soon as possible if a chemical release has the potential to contaminate our well(s). DETERMINATION: Based on the evidence in the record. the Director determines the DroDosal comDlies with SDC 3.3-200. subiect to the Conditions of ADDroval. SUMMARY OF CONDITIONS 1. Chemicals used/ stored on-site must be consistent with those listed on the HMIS submitted on June 12, 2008. 2. On an annual basis, provide SUB with an updated HMIS that highlights all products added since the last submittal. . 3. Maintain a current list of all DNt\PL products that have been reviewed and/ or eliminated from the HMIs.' Include the product name, manufacturer, and DNAPL components. The log should include KrytaIon, Toxi-Tube A, and Toxi-Tube B. For procedure 2 of Annex C of the HMMP,include a sample of the log that includes these three products; 4. Prior to occupancy, an inspection to verify physical aspects and processes of the site is required. Please contact Amy Chinitz at 744-3745 to schedule this inspection. ,Pathology Consuhants Case No. DRClOOB-00033 3 ~ "'" '. Additional Information: The application, all documents, and evidence relied upon by the applicant, and the applicable criteria of approval are available for free inspection and copies are available for a fee at the Development Services Department, 225 Fifth Street, Springfield, Oregon. Questions: Please call Steve Hopkins iri the Planning Division of th~: Development Services Department at (541) 726-3649. Prepared by: Steve Hopkins, AICP Planner II Development Services - Urban Planning Division Pathology Consultants Case No. DRClOOB-00033 4 . SPRONGP'RD~ 1J1I,'-';f,j,;f.'1.i1:rtI'I"";/~It/Nil");I.:i'tM~ -- . DEVELOPMENT SERVICES . . tI!i PLANNING DEPARTMENT 225 FIFTH STREET ' SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 Philip Farrington Pee.ceHealth ' 123 International Way Springfield, OR 97477 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING DEPARTMENT 225 FIFTH STREET SPRINGFIELD,OR 97477 ....tI!i~ Joyce Siamon Pathology Consultants PC 755 E 11th Ave Eugene, OR 97401 . , Matt Matthews TBG Architects and Planners, Inc. 132 E Broadway, Suite 200 Eugene, OR 97401 ~~8