Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAIS PLANNER 7/7/2008 _ AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY Meeting Datlo. Meeting Type: Department: Staff Contact: Staff Phone No: Estimated Time: July 7, 2008 Regular Meeting Development Services Andy Limbird 0..1-;Jl1-: x3784 ~ 15 minutes SPRINGFIELD . CITY COUNCIL ITEM TITLE: ACTION REQUESTED: ISSUE STATEMENT: ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF SPRlNGFlELD (57'" St Prop LLC - Case Number C SP 2008 - LRP2008-00001) Conduct a public hearing and adopt/not adopt the following ordinance: AN ORDINANCE MODIFYING AND APPROVING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF SPRlNGFlELD, LANE COUNTY METROPOLITAN WASTEWATER SERVICE DISTRICT, AND WlLLAMALANE PARK AND RECREATION DISTRICT; AND WITHDRAWING THE SAME TERRITORY FROM THE WlLLAKENZlE RURAL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. The property owner has requested annexation of a 1.51 acre parcel located at 725 South 57'" Street (Map 18-02-04-11, Tax Lot 4600). As submitted by the owner, the annexation area comprises a single tax lot and contains a single-family dwelling. The purpose of the annexation is to allow connection of the existing house to City sewer and water, and to facilitate future development although no specific development plans have been submitted at this time. The attached Staff Report (Attachment 1) includes an analysis of the annexation request and recommended Council actions. Maps of the annexation area, as submi1!ed, are included with the Staff Report (Attachment2). 'r ....... "" The annexation area can be served with the minimum level of key urban facilities and services as required in the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan. Services. are immediately available at the property frontage, and for this reason it is the determination of staff that an Annexation Agreement is not required. The west property line of the annexation area is separated from the City limits by an unincorporated, IO-foot wide segment of South 57'" Street. To the north and south of the property, the entire street right-of-way for South 57'" Street is inside the City limits. It is recommended that this segment of South 57'" Street be included in the annexation to eliminate the potential for a remnant portion of unincorporated street right-of-way surrounded by the City limits. The Director's recommendation to the City Council is to (a) modifY the annexation area to include the 10-foot wide strip of South 57'" Street adjacent to the subject property, (b) approve the annexation of territory, as modified, to the City of Springfield, Lane County Metropolitan Wastewater Service District, and Willamalane Park and Recreation District; and (c) withdraw the same modified annexation area from the Willakenzie Rural Fire Protection District. Staff Report and Recommendation Area, Vicinity and Site Maps Ordinance with Exhibits Exhibit A: Map and Legal Description Exhibit B: Owner Consents and Application Exhibit C: Staff Report . The City Council is authorized by ORS Chapter 222 and SDC Article 5.7 to accept, process, and act on annexation requests from property owners (Attachment 3, Exhibit B). Without an Emergency Clause, the annexation will become effective the day following the next election cycle (November 5, 2008), consistent with SDC 5.7-155 and ORS 222.040, 222.180, and 222.465. Based on this method of initiation, an election on the question of annexation is not allowed. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment I: Attachment 2: Attachment 3: DlSCUSSIONI FINANCIAL IMPACT: A 10-foot wide portion of existing South 57'" Street right-of-way is recommended to be included in the annexation area. The annexation area, as modified, includes one residential unit and is located inside the urban growth boundary (UGB). The current City limits run along three sides of the site. Annexation is being requested in order to facilitate future development. Lane County Assessor's records attribute a 2007 assessment value of $305,945 to the property. As new development occurs, the assessed value will increase and additional revenue will be added to the City's tax base. File Name: 57th StPropLLC Annexation " "-, TYPE IV -ANNEXATION STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Own~r(s)/Applicant(s): Chanlin McCown OJi behalf of 57U, St Prop LLC Case Number: C SP 2008 - LRP2008-00001 Proposal Location: East of and adjacent to South 57th Street, and west of Bob Straub Parkway. Municipally addressed as 725 South 57th Street (Assessor's Map 18-02-04-11, Tax Lot 4600). Staff recommended annexation area includes a portion of South 57th Street right-of-way along the property frontage. ' Existiu'g Zoning:' Low Density Residential (LDR) with an Urbanizing Fringe Overlay (UF-I0) Zoning After Annexation: Low Density Residential (LDR) Metro Plan Designation: Low Density Residential Application Submittal Date: April 8, 2008 Associated Applications: ZON2007-00054 (Development Issues Meeting) CITY OF SPRINGFIELD'S DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE 1 POSITION' 1 Project Manager 1 Transportation Planning Engineer 1 Public Works Civil Engineer I Deputy Fire Marshal 1 Community Services Manager REVIEW OF Planning Transportation Systems Streets and Utilities, Fire and Life Safety . -Building NAME Andy Limbird Jon Driscoll 1 Eric Walter 1 Gilbert Gordon 'I Dave Puent PHONE 726-3784 726-3679 736-1034 726-2293 . 726-3668 APPLICANT'S DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TEAM 1 POSITION I Owner I Applicant's Representative I Consulting Engineer NAME Chanlin McCown 57th St Prop LLC N/A PHONE 912-6118 I MAILING. ADDRESS 362 42"0 Street Springfield OR 97478 I I N/A , C SP 2008 - LRP2008-0000 1 (57" St Prop, LLC) Page 1 of8 Review Process (SDC 5.7-115): The subject annexation application is being reviewed under Type IV procedures, without Planning Commission consideration. Development Issues Meeting (SDC 5.7-120): A Development Issues Meeting (DIM) IS required Qf all annexation applications. Finding: A Development Issues Meeting (DIM) was held on January 24, 2008 (Case ZON2007- 00054) to explain the new process for annex<1tion effective January 1,2008, following adoption of the City's Annexation Ordinance now codified in Article 5.7 of the Springfield Development Code (SDC). Conclusion: The requirement in SDC 5.7-120 is met. Annexation Initiation and Application Submittal (SDC 5.7-125): The City of Springfield received written consents' from the property owners (Donald McCabe, Cheryl McCabe and Chanlin McCown on behalf of 57th St Prop LLC) initiating the annexation consistent with SDC 5.7-125. As initiated, the annexation area includes one tax lot; staff are recommending inclusion of a portion of South 57th Street right-of-way (Attachment i). Finding: The method of initiation meets the requirements of SDC 5.7-125.B.2.b.i and ORS 222.170(1), which requires written consents from more than. half of the owners of land in the territory to be annexed, who also own more than half of the land in the contiguous territory and of the real property therein representing more than half of the assessed value of all real property in the contiguous territory. Finding: The applicant submitted the necessary annexation application forms as required in SDC ,5.7-125.5 - 15 and the application was determined to be a complete filing on April 8, 2008. Conclusion: The application requirements in SDC 5.7-125 have been met. Site Information: The annexation area, as submitted, includes one tax lot with an estimated total area of 1.51 acres, and is contiguous with the Springfield City limits on three sides. The west boundary. of the subject site is separated from the City limits by a IO-foot wide strip of South 57th Street right-of-way. Staff are recommending inclusion of the 10-foot wide strip of right-of-way to ensure that all of this fully improved street is within the City limits. Finding: The owner is not proposing to develop the site at this time. The area requested for annexation is developed with one single-family residence and a barn, and services ar~ provided as follows: police (Oregon State Police, Lane County Sheriff), schools (Springfield School District 19), roads (City of Springfield), and Fire (Willakel)Zie Rural Fire Protection District , contracting with the City. of Spoogfield). There is no established water district within the area, and the property is served by a private well system. Upon 'lJ1I1exation, the property owner can request connection to the Springfield Utility Board (SUB) water system. , C SP 2008 - LRP2008-0000 1 (57~ St Prop, LLC) Page 2 of8 Notice Requirements (SDC 5.7-130): Consistent with SDC 5.7-130, notice was provided as follows: . I' .J Mailed Notice. Notice of the annexation application was mailed June 20, 2008,which is at least 14 days prior to the public hearing date, to the affected property owner(s) (the annexation areas are public facilities and not in private ownership); owners and occupants of properties located within 300 feet of the perimeter of the affected territory; affected neighborhood groups or community organizations officially recognized by the city that includes the affected territory; (including, but not limited to, Southwest Thurston Association, Washburne Neighborhood Association, East Alton Baker Association, and the Game Farm Neighbors Association); affected special districts and all other public utility providers; and the Lane County Land Management Division, Lane County Elections, and the Lane County Board of Commissioners. Newspaper Notice. Notice of the July 7, 2008 public hearing was published in The Register-Guard on June 18, and June 25, 2008. Posted Notice. Notice of the July 7, 2008 public hearing was posted in four public places in the City [in two locations in the area of the annexation; at the Springfield City Hall Development Services Division; and on the City of Springfield websiteJ on June 23, 2008, for two successive weeks prior to the hearing date. Finding: Upon annexation of the subject property to the City the site will retain its Low Density Residential zoning, but the Urbanizable Fringe Overlay District (UF-lO) will no longer apply. Due to this change, the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) was notified in writing of the annexation proceedings more than 45 days prior to the public hearing. Conclusion: Notice of the public hearing was provided consistent with SDC 5.7-130. Recommendation to City Council (SDC 5.7-135): The Director shall forward a written recommendation on the annexation application to the City Council based on the approval criteria specified in Section 5.7-140, which are provided as follows with the SDC requirements, fmdings, and conclusions. The Director's recommendation follows SDC 5.7-140, Criteria. Criteria (SDC 5.7-140): The application may be approved only if the City Council fmds that the proposal conforms to the following criteria: . A. The affected territory proposed to be annexed is within the City's urban growth boundary; and is 1. Contiguous to the city limits; or 2.' Separated from the City only by it public right of way or a stream, lake or other body of water. Finding: The subject annexation area is located within the ackpowledged urban growth boundary (UGB) of the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan (Metro Plan). The UGB is C SP 2008 - LRP2008-0000 1 (57ili stProp, LLC) Page 3 of8 locatecj approximately 2,500' feet southwest of the annexation, area. The annexation area is contiguous to the Springfield city limits along the northern, eastern and southern sides. The western boundary is separated from the Springfield City limits by a lO-foot strip of South 57th Street right-of-way, which is part ofthe modified annexation area. Conclusion: The proposal meets.this criterion. B. The proposed annexation is consistent with applicable policies in the Metro Plan and in any applicable refinement plans or Plan Districts; Finding: The Metro Plan was acknowledged by the Limd Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC) in August, 1982 and has been subsequently amended. The annexation area is located within the acknowledged UGB of the Metro Plan. Territory within the UGB ultimately will be within the City of Springfield. ' Finding: The Metro Plan recognizes that ultimately, all territory within theUGB will be annexed to an existing city (Policy #10, page II-C-4; l'olicy #16, page II-C-5; and Policy #21, page II-C- 6). Springfield is the unit of government identified in the Metro Plan to provide urban services to annexed territory. Finding: The Metro Plan recognizes that as annexations to the City occur, existing special service districts within the UGB will be dissolved (Policy #18, page II-C-6)., The continued annexation of properties t~ the City of Springfield is consistent with the Metro Plan, which will result in the elimination of several special districts within the urbanizable area. Finding: The annexation area is within the WiIlakenzie Rural Fire Protection District (RFPD). The fire district contracts with the City of Springfield for fire services within its boundaries. After the public hearing and if determined by the City Council that withdrawal is in the best interest of the City, the annexation area will be withdrawn from the'RFPD consistent with ORS 222.510, 222.520, and 222.525 and the City will provide fire services directly to the annexed I property. Finding: After the public hearing and if deteimined by the City Council that annexation is in the best interest of the City, the annexation area will be annexed into the Lane County Metropolitan Wastewater Service District as authorized by an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) between the City of Springfield and Lane County. This special district was formed to provide the financing for the regional wastewater treatment plant serving wastewater users within the City of Springfield. Finding: After the public hearing and if determined by the City Council that annexation is in the best interest of the City, the annexation area will be annexed into the WiIlamalane Park and Recreation District as authorized by an intergovernmental agreement between the City of Springfield and Lane County. The park district provides .park and recreation facilities and services to territory within the City of Spril!gfield. Conclusion: The proposal meets this criterion. C SP 2008 - LRP2008-0000 1 (57" St Prop LLC) Page 4 of 8 C. The proposed annexation will result in a boundary in which the minimum level of key urban facilities and services as defined in the Metro Plan can be provided in an orderly efficient and timely manner, and Finding: The Metro Plan recognizes annexation as the highest priority for extending the minirimm level of key urban facilities and services to urbanizableareas (Policie~ #8 and # 10, page II-C-4).' Finding: The annexation area Will take advantage of urban service delivery systems that are already in place to serve this area. Because the required urbari utilities are immediately available to the site in the public street frontage along' South 57th Street, the City's Public Works Department determined that an Annexation Agreement was not required. In addition to urban utilities, the following facilities and services are either available or can be extended to this annexation area: Water -SUB Water provides water service to developed properties in this area of south Springfield. There is an existing 6-inch water line located in South 57th Street. Upon annexation, water service to the existing house and new development within the subject area can be provided by this water line consistent with SUB standards. Electricity - SUB Electric provides service to developed properties in this area of Springfield. Upon annexation, electrical service to the existing house and new development within the subject area can be extended from the existing electrical system. Police Services - Springfield Police Department currently provides service to other properties in this general area already inside the City. After annexation, this area will receive police services on an equal basis with properties inside the City. Infill annexations and development in this area will increase the efficiency of service delivery to this area. Fire and Emen!encv Services - Fire protection is currently provided to the annexation area by the Willakenzie Rural Fire Protection District. This 'special district contracts with the City of Springfield for fire services to territory within the district's boundaries. Springfield fue stations are located near Pheasant Avenue and Hayden Bridge Way, South 47th Street and Main Street, th . and South 68 Street and Main Street. Concurrent with annexation to the City of Springfield, the annexation area will be withdrawn from the rural fire district in accordance with ORS 222, if the City Council determines that withdrawal is in the best interest of the City. Emergency medical transport (ambulance) services are provided on a regional basis by Eugene, Springfield, and Lane Rural Fire/Rescue to central Lane County. The annexation area will continue to receive this service consistent with the adopted ambulance service area (ASA) plan. Mutual aid agreements have been adopted by the three regional ASA providers to provide backup coverage for each other's jurisdictions. . C SP 2008 - LRP2008-0000 I (57ili Sl Prop LLCi Page 5 of8 Parks and Recreation - Park and recreation services are provided to the City of Springfield by the Willamalane Park and Recreation District. Indoor recreation facilities, such as the Willamalane Park Swim Center, Lively Park Swim Center, Memorial Building Community Center, and Willamalane Adult Activity Center will be available to residents as new development Oc.curs. The park district offers various after-school and other programs for children at schools and parks throughout the cOmlnunity. Also available are pathways and several categories of parks, including community parks, sports parks, special use parks, and ,natural area parks. Bluebelle Park, a 2.58-acre neighborhood park located at South 50th Place and Bluebelle Way, and Volunteer Park, a 4.4"acre neighborhood park on Holly Street at South 43rd Street, are located in the vicinity. A new neighborhood park also has been developed in the Jasper Meadows subdivision on South 57th Street near Mt. Vernon Road. Concurrent with annexation to the City of Springfield, the subject area will be annexed to the Willamalane Park and Recreation District consistent with City policy, if the City Council determines that annexation to the special district is in the best interest of the City. Schools - Springfield School'District 19 serves this area. Existing schools-Mt. Vernon elementary, Agnes' Stewart middle, and Thurston high-serve this neighborhood and can accommodate students resulting from new development occurring within the annexation area. Sanitary Sewer - The western portion of the subject property can be served by an existing 8-inch public sanitary sewer line in South 57th Street. If further development of the property is proposed in the future, it will be the responsibility of the property owner/developer to review the site for specific sewer design requirements and verifY capacity in the public system. Concurrent with annexation to the City of Springfield, the annexation area will be annexed to the Lane County Metropolitan Wastewater Service District, if the City Council determines that annexation to the special district is in the best interest of the City. Stormwater - An existing stormwater management system in located within South 57th Street, and consists of a l2-inch diameter pipe which is adequate to serve the property. Any further development or redevelopment in the 'annexation area will require appropriate stormwater management techniques in accordance with City standards. Streets - The subject property frC!nts South 57th Street on the west and Bob Straub Parkw~y on the east. There is no provision for direct access from the property onto Bob Straub Parkway. Along the property frontage, South 57th Street is not developed to full urban standards and lacks curb, gutter, sidewalk, street trees and a defined bike lane. Full street improvements will be required with future development or redev~lopment .of the property, and will, need :to be constructed or bonded prior to approval of a Final Plat or Final Site Plan. Additionally, with future development or redevelopment or the annexation area, a 7-foot wide Public Utility Easement (PUE) will be required along the property frontage to accommodate extension of public utilities to serve the subject area and adjacent properties. As submitted, the annexation area only includes Tax Lot 4600. Staff review of the annexation has determined that a lO-foot wide strip of South 57th Street along the frontage of the subject C SP 2008 - LRP2008-0000 r (57~ St Prop, LLC) Page 6 of8 . property is not within the City limits. Staff propose a modification of the annexation area to include the small segment of public street right-of-way (totaling approximately 0.05 acres) to ensure that all of South 57th Street along the property frontage is within the City limits. This will also eliminate the. potential creation of an unincorporated "island" area for the 10- foot wide by 235-foot long segment of South 57th Street. The City's Public Works Department supports the modified annexation despite not having a fully-improved public street along. the property frontage. Solid Waste Manal:!ement - The City and Sanipac have an exclusive franchise arrangement for garbage service inside the City limits. Upon annexation, Sanipac will serve this property. Communication Facilities - V'arious providers offer both wired and wireless communication services in the Eugene-Springfield metropolitan area. Existing providers and those entering the market have the capability to provide service to future development in this area. Land Use Controls - The annexation area is within Springfield's portion of the urban growth boundary. Through an intergovernmental agreement between Lane County and the City of Springfield, the City already has planning and building jurisdiction for this property. The City will continue to administer'land use controls after annexation. Finding: The minimum level of key urban facilities and services, as defined on page V-3 of the Metro Plan, are either immediately available or, can be provided within a reasonable future time frame as needed. Conclusion: The proposal meets this criterion.' D. Where applicable fiscal impacts to the City have been mitigated through an Annexation Agreement or other mechanism approved by the City Council. Finding: Staff have determined that existing utility infrastructure and necessary services are readily available to the annexation area, and therefore no Annexation Agreement was required. An Improvement Agreement for future street improvements will be required and, upon development or redevelopment of ' the site, the public street frontage must meet the applicable standards of the Springfield Development Code and the City'~ Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual. Conclusion: The proposal meets this criterion, DIRECTOR'S RECOMMENDATION: Modify the annexation area to include a 10-foot wide section of South sib Street right-of-way along the' frontage of Tax Lot 4600; approve . the modified annexation of territory to the City of Springfield, Lane County Metropolitan Wastewater Service District, and Willamalane Park and Recreation District, and withdraw the modified annexation area from the Willakenzie Rural Fire Protection District. City Council Decision (SDC 5.7-145): C;ity Council approval of the annexation application shall be by Ordinance. C SP 2008 - tRP2008-0000 I (57" St Prop, LLC) Page 7 of8 Finding: Without an Emergency Clause, the annexation will become effective the day following the next election, which is November 5, 2008, The applicant's annexation requesfwas submitted to the City in February, 2008. Finding: The City Council held a Public Hearing on July 7, 2008 for the subject annexation request. Based on the staff analysis and recommendation, ,and on testimony provided at the Public Hearing, the City Council approved the annexation area (Map 18-02-04-11, Tax Lot 4600 totaling approximately 1.51 acres; and a segment of South 57th Street right-of-way totaling approximately 0.05 acres) per Ordinance No. . totaling approximately 1.56 acres. Zoning (SDC 5.7-150): The annexation area is designated Low Density Residential in the Metro Plan and is currently zoned LDR/UF-I0 (Low Density Residential with Urbanizing Fringe Overlay District). Finding: Upon the effective date of the annexation, the UF-1O overlay is automatically removed and the subject property is zoned consistent with the Metro Plan designation. Effective Date and Notice of Approved Annexation (SDC 5.7-155): If the annexation is approved by the City Council on JuIy 7, 2008 ,with an Emergency Clause, the Ordinance will become effective upon adoption by the City Council and execution by the Mayor. Finding: City Council gave second reading to Ordinance on . 2008. The Ordinance became effective consistent with SDC 5.7-155 and ORS Chapter 222 on 2008. Withdrawal from Special Service Districts(SDC 5.7-160): Withdrawal from special districts may occur. concurrently with the approved annexation Ordinance or after the effective date of the annexation of territory to the City. The Director shall recommend to the City Council for consideration of the withdrawal of the annexed territory from special districts as specified in ORS 222. In determining whether to withdraw the territory; the City Council shall determine whether the withdrawal is in the best interest of the City, Notice of the withdrawal shall be provided in the same manner as the annexation notice in Section 5.7-150. Finding: The annexation area is within .the Willakenzie Rural Fire Protection District. Consistent with SDC 5.7-160, notice was provided, a public hearing was held, and the City Council determined that withdrawal from the Willakenzie Rural Fire Protection District was in the best interest of the City. The withdrawal decision was codified in Ordinance No. ; 'EX-hi bit: [J '8! Assessor's Map showing strip of road right-of-way recommended for annexation C SP 2008 - LRP2008-0000 I (57~ St Prop, LLC) Page 8 of8 ATTACHMENT 1 - Extract from Assessor's Map 18-02-04-11 -, .1 t , : ~ i ~ - ~ Q) Q) I ... - en ~ ..<: , .... ..... ~ II) ~ = , :J . ) 0 en,; ./' ~~, ~I , .~I' ~ 1:)' ~I ~ 1 :~ ) Note: Map Not To Scale I;; u '-~ " , '-' v (1-'--- .~. ':~ 4600 ~ ~~ ~~~; , , ~~ , , ~ I Springfield City Limits o )i"Hd/3 0 , ~ III 11{ SITE 10"footwide strip of South 57th Street right-of-way recommended for inclusion in modified annexation area . N , Bob Straub Parkway m >< ::I: OJ ~;r~ . 40.0' li~' ---3. €--€)I. fl., LJ. Ii~ ~i' I.!J . Springfield City-Limits - d-(::" 0 -i J;. g. 13 )> I "t:I ~ Subject Area Sprlngfiold, OR A r ~. I " I ,r " " ~ ,,," ,;- , ,./~=-;;;-~.,. ~'NOAELD iiij There are no warron1ies that accompany this produc' Wii: Users ossume o' ,..sponSiJJll~ fOr any. ~ss ~ damage JAA.. snsmg f10in any etror, omlsstO/1 or positional Inaccuracy ..... at this product. L~ C:J Springfie~ City Umits 1'.0""'008 t !J.;;..J o 0.5 1 Miles Subject Neighborhood I J I I Daisy SI ~. \ \::j i j I I 1 1 ~ r 1111111' / ,~IILJeJI~ ,- I I II I) I ., I I I ' 1- I \ I, 1 \ ~ =i .~~' ~ ______ J I 1 \ . .-1' ~ I r , I... "' I~ I~ , ) I ~I .firZ . , " , , " I " " , , . 19\\\ -L \ tidle JJ ) ~llr~ .c _t:. ",- Mt. Vernon Rd J f'--. en - ---- ----:.-=-- " Springfield, OR \~ \v/ ~ N : I LV" i r~--' <\ \ I .----..::...........,...... ~ ......... ...; .... \ . I r I I I I I I ( \',- <l' 'ls ~ l <$ -0 ~ ~ ~ ,----, '" L 1---" --- L-.J ax ots 1 O' .-=-=II __..I ulslde of City U 't C>c.dI UGB 1---1 ml S 1__..1 IMlhin City Limits o 200 SPRINGFIELD '~" 01. There are no . Users warranties that accom . ......- ~ ., assume all responsibild ; pany this product. ~ 'lr4I7 ~?~7; ;:::u"c':y errar, amiss:" ~~ :~~:aIO:damage , . Inaccuracy 400 I Feet Subject Site Springfield, OR 6) \ ( \ J / \ J <\ \ I -.J Glacier Dr --'---, I 1 ) - Ul .l: - .... It') Ul \. \ ~ '~ ~ .,." (S -0 ~ \ ?l , Ridge Ct " '\ (' D Tax Lots 1~~;:J Outside of City Umits e UGB :::;:J WIthin City Limits . There are no warranties that accompany this product Users assume an responsibility for any loss or damage arising from anyenur, omission or positional inacx;uracy of this product. o 50 100 ,__Feel /' , ~ ~ .~ . , j.. , ~ ~ - ~ Q) ~I CI) II " , .c - ..... U) ; , :J, O. CI)" ~~, ~I ~I . ' I \:)' <:-.1 "\' . ATTACHMENT 1 - Extract from Assessor's Map 18-02-04-11 . N ~ ~ ~.) L U J el-- '- d'I.' 4600 ,~1 ~' I (I (I ~~~ 'i , " ~~ ... ~f L (~i '<l, ,J:k.... ~t~1u ~S:: , ~ ~~ " ~~ " .t1 ~ .~ ~~. . ~ ~, .Q , o ~~ i1(~, ~~ ~(I '" ~ (~ " 3t6 Springfield City Limits' o ',;;', [-l....... 0 :::e" 0:'1''' A..J " SITE BOb Straub Parkway r - 1'O-foot wide strip of South 57th Street right-of-way recommended for inclusion in modified annexation area , ------ ~ 3T~.'lf..O' &0 ; e €> .G" sp;r"gfie'71ci~qimitP ,..7. g G ..DG(5G i NOlO: Map Not To Scale " ~ ~ /' " d"o "t, .. :~ ~~.~ ~; ~ t~~ ( ~,:~' '~~- ( ~" f~ ~ :~ ~~ (&" ~~ .... ~~ \,. (~.~ .... -~;' ~ (~ ~, (I; ,{;! ~, .s (~ .... ~ ~ ;:;' ~ ~. · ~(i ~I ~c1 "I ~'1j ;~~-~ , ~ ~ ..... \ CI) ~I en r .<: .... t-- 10 .!: - ::J o en" ,~, . . ~J EXHIBIT A Part 1012 ~ 1< Springfield City Limits O~H;38 ., , ., ~ 4600 SITE 1 O-foot wide strip of South 57th Street right-of-way included in modified annexation area . N Bob Straub . Parkway '~:J 0~r ~3;;.#. "f!:P' r. r r.'l , 0' ,;.:.,\ ,~ -tJ 1 'i:.;) <1;,' Springfield City Limits g, &. .[;;. Note: Map Not To Scale (il, u EXHIBIT A Part 2 of2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Beg at a pt in the cent of Co Rd No. 452 (aka South 57th Street), sd POB being on the W Ii DLC No. 61 Tl8S R02W WM 1,580.00 ft N of the SW cor thereof; th due E 20.00 ft to an iron pipe on the edge of the Co Rd r/w; th due E 374.40 ft to an iron pipe; th N35035'W 298:00 ft to an iron pipe; th due W 206.90 ft to an iron pipe on the edge of Co Rd r/w; th due W. 20.00 ft to the c/li of Co Rd No. 452; th due S alg the c/li ofsd Co Rd and the W Ii ofDLC No. 61 235.00 ft to the POB,in Lane CountY, Oregon. J -'--, -. --- -..- .. ,EXHIBIT B City of Springfield Development Services Departm,ent 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 . Annexation Application Type IV,. ... -...- LAa/7/~' ~COGJ/I Applicant Name: Company: Address: 3('" ...z. ",'/ -J #. t;/2 ~S'r' ~/6' .s'V/ 9/2-(('//8 1 13-VI Fax: 9'F,P- 96'81 HQ/J! 0--- 97V7,r Applicant Signature: Property Owner: Company: Address: 1 Owner Signature: I, I whe .-k"1 ~ 51'+)., $f.. "P...ol><'h'.J,;,s LLc Phone: Fax: ~ ~~c:: --- ASSESSOR~S MAP NO: / P -o?- -0 <./ -1/ TAX LOT NO(S): </COO Property Address: "7:Z~7 s .,j- 7 ~, S'..j. _ P~7jJ~/~ 0,.... q 7 C/7"L' I. Area of Request Square Feet: ..,j-;:?ool' ,Acres: 1...1/ I ~"..N~ ~'.;;;;;'''~'^''''^.........~~...~..._...",,,",,,,,.,,,,-,,-,.,,,''';;;;'''.'''m",,=..,^,""",,,,,,,,"''''''''_''''='''4*"",'_''''"""'''-"'~''k<'''''~",'''',,",,",""''''''''''''_,,,,,~=,''''~''''''~_~.M.-.>."~""",""""'=_C~""~,,,,",""'."",",,,",~__'o/';~"'-',"'_"""""'-'~"_"'~"'u_,,"='_""".~I Existing Use(s) of Property: J;~'rh / ,~/;{. / /!pc/at:", /"'c J Proposed Use of Property: . j .A/O //V~ as' e.f' nkve/d;h'H1e~/,J-- ,,;t,./- /-/'':1 ,.l,--,.. F Reviewed By: Case No.: LRP Zoo~ _ 0000 I Date: f'.,?/l..lL a, 7.<Jo~ (initials), Ap lication Fee:1> 5 151. L. L' Postage Fee: *2- Sq \HT;t; Ac...L Uai€l i'/aeGllled: Pfai1f1~1 At. '1/ilzooJ I I Application #: C SP :2008 - For City Use Only FORM 1 PETITION/PETITION SIGNATURE SHEET Annexation by Individuals We, the following property own'ersjelectors, consent to the annexation of the following territory to the City of Springfield: 11'~/~4~ Date Residence Address Signed Print Name mldlv (street, city, zip code) - ------ / .5 C L <./ <;or,,;? ""'" .rr- l//z//Jr' ,--,,(....~;.. dc;;,W;1 l6'il... 17'/.;( o,~ ~'7'i?' 2'lliO ) 0 3/:/ "7l r L I ""(.~,JU c.n....o \r ~ /J /17/01' A--!or".....I.>t. ,Vl1 <r4J,.-". r--t/,,~~~'?.o n___ 3. ~/~ 1/11(';;0 ilior Chery / /Ylpfl:i,,_ >" ' , . 4. (J h y- S7i:-'1 5',1 ?rr:r' LL-C-- Signature Map and Tax Lot Number (example: 17-04-03-00-00100) /Ir-oz-ov-// 0/',,"00 y" ,/ Land Reg Acres Owner Voter (qq I ./ /' /.~/ I ,/ ./ " I ./' ,/ " I I (Attach evidence of such . , .. ,5. 'Note: With the above signature(s), I am attesting t lat I have the- authority to consent to annexation on my own behalf or on behalf of my firm or agency. authorization when applicable.) I, ~ ~~ _,~k ~ (printed name of circulator), hereby certify that every person who signed this sheet did so in my presence. , X f~ .4d~--- - (cig""tyre of circulator) , CERTIFICATION OF OWNERSHIP The total landowners in the proposed 'annexation are..3 (qty). This petition reflects that .:3 (qty) landowners (or legal representatives) listed on this petition represent a total of IOe) (%) of the landowners and /00 (%) of the acres as determined by the map,and tax lots attached to the petition. A& T is not responsible for subsequent deed activity that may not yet be reflected on the A& T computerized tax roll. ~~.~ Lane County Department of Assessment and Taxation </-/1-03' . Date Signed and Certified CERTIFICATION OF ELECTORS The total active registered voters in the proposed annexation are .3 .I hereby certify that this petition includes .3 valid signatures representing _ /00 (%) of the total active registered voters that are registered in the proposed annexation. Lane County Clerk or Deputy Dat$ Received: 'I~'&<> p Planner: AL --;r== Date Signed and Certified ELT - 45047 Page I of 1 Legal Description Beginning at a point in the center of County Road No, 452, said Point of Beginning being on the West line of Donation Land Claim No. 61, Township 18 South, Range 2 West of the Willamette Meridian, and 1580.0 feet North of the Southwest coiner thereof; thence due East 20.0 feet to an iron pipe on the edge of the County Road right-of-way; thence due East 374.4 J feetto an iron pipe; thence North 35035' West 289.0'feet to an iron pipe; thence due West 206.9+eet to an iron pipe on the edge oftjJ.e County Road right-of-way; thence due West 20.0/ feet-to the centerline of County Road No. 452; thence due South along j;?e centerline of said County Road and the West line of Donation Land Claim No. 61,235,0 feet to the Point of Beginning, in Lane County, Oregon; EXCEPT that portion described in Deed to Lane County, a political subdivision of the State of Oregon, Recorded June 9,1966, Reception No. 50258, Lane County Oregon Records. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM that portion conveyed to Lane County, by instrument Recorded July 31, 2000, Reception No. 2000-043640, Lane County Oregon Records, Date ReceiVed:-r/fOd6' Planner: AL FORM 3 SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (Complete all the fo/lowing questions and provide a/l the requested information. Attach , any responses that require additional space, restating the question or request for information on additional sheets.) Contact Person: E-mail: ~,,/,;' Ac..k- ~"/;;"h?,,.~ /~ /I!f?~ .A~~. Supply the following information regarding the annexation area. o Estimated Population (at present): c ~ o Number of Existing Residential Units: / o Other Uses:' ,,/ if o Land Area: /. ? I (. S I total acres o Existing Plan Designation(s): 5JA7!i/c. !J,.,,%., aJ/:-ft--,h'r; / o Existing Zoning(s):' ~ r/;"~j<; NSJA.,17.: / llA r o Existing Land Use(s): "/;"1 /r7_ ~A>~1- /'t'3/;;h.,.h'4/ ,hi//<? .,6"cf o Applicable Comprehensive Plan(s): "../ if ~ PCa-I" o Applicable Refinement Plan(s): A/ /.4 o Provide evidence that the annexation is consistent with the applicable comprehensive plan(s) and any associated refinement plans. . c.~ ,1.1t:J",.,,,1r o Are there development plans associated with this proposed annexation? Yes No 1>( If yes, describe. o Is the proposed use or development ,a~owed on the property under the current, plan designation and zoning? /I/' /.1- ' Y~s No 2/15/08 DatEl Received" iI!e/';fKJ/ . . ,Planner: AL Page 9 of 15 . Does this application include all contiguous property under the same ownership? Yes, !X No " If no, state the reasons why all property is not included: . Check the special districts and others that provide service to the annexation area: IJ Wi /l&.;yr~ p~, ~- fb.u Dh '0 Glenwood Water District 0 Rainbow Water and Fire District o Eugene School District 0 Pleasant Hill School District ~ Springfield School District 0 McKenzie Fire & Rescue o Pleasant Hill RFPD .l(willakenzie RFPD o EPUD iii, SUB~ Kl Other ~/!eltI FJn. J- /;te. S..te-I-; ~No . Names, of persons to whom staff notes and notices should be sent, in addition to applicant(s), such as an agent or legal representative. ' C#;";,-,, ~c;.t;e ~am~ ~am~ -3C,l ....v. ""~~ Srt- (Address) (Address) J/}~/}d/ Or 9'?V76' (city) . (Zip) (City) (Zip) (Name) , (Name) (Address) (Address) (City) . (Zip) (City) (Zip) 2/15/08 Date. Received' ;,/00dJ Planner: AL Page 10 of 15 3(s/o8 ru f>.-V f' A- .\. <'~ -e ~ ' -.... ' L --\.-l.... 7">-,...1 \..v{ L~ ~ lA.. -+-0, ' ~~-C I ~,<, ~ '""'~..,.--, G \ , , , Q --L:: +G.-e C \'~ cd, <;~r,'~ h<? (<0 ~~^P~~ .' ~ .~ ~ l tc.. w ('-.L~,'.A.. 4-l<<- S~r^c'-1 t=:.,. ,c..9 U,J' L'r"'- C;:::..-v~~ l6o<-<.,,,D.~~, ,'-:r.. 'I') AI~ ~J./'T((~ S~rv-c",-~",c9 b~ ~:~ ~~r--".--I-~Q..s, /0.. ( , ~' rv' ( c. -e) Afl...Q C "LA. r roe '" --\- \~ .: ~ ~ (~""- . 't l.:;>...~ LN, \1 L-e. h....o ,'FtS <.>9- ( \~r'''l .~+s ll><\-\. .,A..:r e.. F<cr j/Jr-- rp" + ?"\- (" "-f- (;, f ...)...(.~~ ' Lv '-- lu~ iJ) I J-,-I' A->c '^" ~~ --h ~ 'U If'" ,,~ l "zm ~-\ C0 ~', (' o<-<...l.o' . < ""'- \ rv v ~ ~ 4/\Q-A. ~ t ~ ~ lJ((! -4 ~ : 9- t> II JQ.. v-";, . -+v -.+-. ~ ,-,' ~, -t" ~ ~~ ^ ~ '""'(j' '^" u"- "",,---:-p,. ~\~ . ~ ---- lJ~.JQ L , lk.:C.C -J___ ' Date Received: '1/ rOil! Planner: AL FORM 2 ' OWNERS AND ELECTORS WORKSHEET (This form is NOT the petition) , (Please include the name and address of ALL owners and electors regardless cif whether they signed an annexation petition or not. This information will assist in determining the appropriate initiating method and for notification purposes.) OWNERS ~ - - ~ - ------ I Property Designation Assessed Imp, Signed 'Signed II (Map/lot number) Name of Owner Acres Value Y / N Yes No ~/B.:o Z.~6<( -11-</t5'IJ:, C~- /,;.. d~ ~ /.-> .I //."S 000 ...---- I II l.t?o..",lal ,#/'~be L1/ .. ....- 'I I' kA'......../ .IJkc...!.e ,/.3/ . . -- I I / I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I I 1 I. 1 I 1 1 1 i I 1 I , I I I, I 1 I I r I I 1 I I I 1 1 I I ,I I .1 I I 1 I 1 1 I I I I 1 I -I 1 I I I 1 I I 1 I 1 ,I I' I I I 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I 1 I I I 1 t . I . 1 1_- TOTALS:I/.J/ 165;~ ~ I ----- DatE! Received; l//Pbo~,{' Planner: Al -f7 FORM 2 (continued) ELECTORS II I I I Signed Signed II Yes No Name of Elector (Please print or type) Address of Elector I I I I I I I I I I I I I I, I I I , I I- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ , TOTALS: , [ 2/15/08 Date Received;-;f.30dl. Planner: AL' , Page 7 of 15 1 I I I I I ' I I FORM 2 (continued) SUMMARY TOTAL NUMBER OF ELECTORS IN THE PROPOSAL NUMBER OF ELECTORS WHO SIGNED PERCENTAGE OF ELECTORS WHO SIGNED TOTAL ACREAGE IN PROPOSAL ACREAGE SIGNED FOR PERCENTAGE OF ACREAGE SIGNED FOR . Application initiated by (for an explanation of the initiating methods, refer to pages 2 and 3 of this packet): o A - All OwnerslMajority Electors [ORS 222.125] . Oll.B -'Majority Owners/ArealValue [ORS 222.170(1)] b'c - Majority Electors/Area [ORS 222.170(2)] 2/15/08 DawReceived:-I4J;(}tJR Planner: AL . , /..3/ /,..>/ /00%' Page 8 of 15 I I EXHIBIT C (A copy of the final Staff Report will be appended to the recorded Ordinance) "