HomeMy WebLinkAboutCorrespondence PLANNER 1/3/2001
--........-...
......,~._,
, -"'''1ll
",.,.. ,,~a9~1J
~~$~MMER$-ReDWP
From:
To:
Date:
Subject:
Mike KELLY
SUMMERS, Sarah
1/3/01 1 :21 PM
Re: DWP
Thanks
>>> Sarah SUMMERS 01103/01 10:07AM >>>
I didn't say ,anything about Rodriguez because the Council had asked for an update on the past effects of
Article 17 and the DWP Overlay District.
Here's what is happening;
SUB and the Health Division are in the process of evaluating the surface water influence to Weyco well
#3, A re-delineation of that wellhead may be made after the surface water influence is determined since
SUB may not be able to use the well in the same way if there is some influence, The final tests are
scheduled for Jan 8 & 9, It will take 2 weeks for the results, After they get the results, SUB and Health Div"
will decide on a course olaction, If there is surface water impact, they could 1) abandon the well, 2)
provide surface water treatment, or 3) use the well in a modified way, The course of action taken will
, impact the delineation, so any re'delineation will have to come after the decision is made regarding how to
use the welL This is the only well effected,
As an aside, Chuck Davis does not agree that the delineation was flawed but will abide by the Health Div,
decision,
lIthe delineation changes on this well, the City would have to adopt the new delineation,
>>> Mike KELLY 01/03/01 09:21AM >>>
Sarah: Goodmemo, Question: Dave'Rodriguez keeps hammering away at the "flaws" of our DWP Plan
around Weyerhaeuser, As I remember, he got one concession about 9 months ago from a State official
who agreed that the modeling was incorrect or ??? Where does this issue stand and does that need to
be part of your update?
RECEIVED
" I=-~- 0 /
By:~